The present invention relates to fuel cells and more particularly to carbon monoxide removal from a reformate stream.
Fuel cells have been proposed for many applications that include electrical vehicular power plants to replace internal combustion engines. In a particular type of fuel cell, namely a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, hydrogen is used as the fuel and is supplied to an anode of the fuel cell and oxygen (such as air) is the oxidant and is supplied to a cathode of the fuel cell. A typical fuel cell is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,316,871 to Swathirajan, et al.
The hydrogen (H2) used in the fuel cell can be extracted from the reformation of methanol or other organics (e.g. hydrocarbons). Unfortunately, the resulting reformate includes undesirably high concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO) which can quickly poison the catalyst of the PEM anode, and therefore, must be removed. For example, in gasoline autothermal reforming steam (H2O), air (O2) and gasoline are reacted in a fuel processor that contains two reaction types. An inlet section promotes a partial oxidation (POX) reaction, which provides the thermal conditions required to promote steam reforming (SR) in an exit section.
These reactions are accomplished heterogeneously within a chemical reactor that provides the necessary thermal energy throughout a catalyst mass and yields a reformate gas comprising H2, carbon dioxide (CO2), CO and H2O. Because the CO (about 5-10%) contained in the H2-containing reformate stream exiting the reformer poisons the PEM anode, the CO must be removed or reduced to a non-toxic concentration.
It is known that the CO level of the reformate can be reduced by utilizing a water-gas shift (WGS) reaction. To achieve this, a WGS reactor is provided, within which H2O (as steam) is added to the reformate exiting the reformer, in the presence of a suitable catalyst, to lower its temperature and increase the steam to carbon ratio therein. A lower temperature and higher steam to carbon ratio serve to lower the carbon monoxide content of the reformate according the following ideal shift reaction: CO+H2O→CO2+H2.
However, some CO still survives the WGS reaction. Depending upon the reformate flow rate and the steam injection rate, the CO content of the gas exiting the shift reactor can be as low as 0.5 mole %. Hence, the shift reactor reformate comprises H2, CO2, H2O and some CO. As a result, the WGS reaction does not sufficiently reduce the carbon monoxide content of the reformate to stack grade (i.e. to below about 20 ppm).
Therefore, it is necessary to further remove carbon monoxide from the hydrogen-containing reformate stream exiting the shift reactor, and prior to supplying it to the fuel cell. It is known to further reduce the CO content of H2-containing reformate exiting the WGS reactor by a so-called preferential oxidation (PrOx) reaction effected in a suitable PrOx reactor. The PrOx reactor comprises a catalyst bed operated at a temperature that promotes the preferential oxidation of the CO by air, in the presence of the O2 but without consuming substantial quantities of the H2. The PrOx reaction is: CO+½O2→CO2.
Often, the O2 required for the PrOx reaction will be about two times the stoichiometric amount required to react the CO in the reformate. If the amount of O2 is excessive, then excessive consumption of H2 results. On the other hand, if the amount of O2 is not more than the stoichiometric amount needed, insufficient CO oxidation will occur. The PrOx process is described in a paper entitled, “Methanol Fuel Processing For Low Temperature Fuel Cells” published in the Program and Abstracts of the 1988 Fuel Cell Seminar, Oct. 23-26, 1988, Long Beach, Calif. and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,271,916 to Vanderbourgh and U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,415 to Mester, iner alia. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,637,415 and 5,316,871, which are each incorporated herein by reference.
One particular area of concern for WGS and PrOx reactors is start-up, or light-off, during which an unacceptably high amount of CO makes it through the WGS and PrOx reactors to the fuel cell stack. This is due to the fact that during this initial time period, the WGS and PrOx reactors have not achieved an operating temperature (approximately >100° C.), whereby the catalyst material is active for catalyzing the CO oxidation reaction.
Therefore, it is desirable in the industry to provide improved WGS and PrOx reactors for reducing CO concentration within a fuel reformate. The PrOx reactor should enable quicker light-off during start-up to limit unacceptable levels of CO being released from the PrOx to the fuel cell stack.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a preferential oxidation reactor (PrOx) for reducing a carbon monoxide content of a reformate stream. The PrOx includes a substrate support assembly having a plurality of substrate support members configured for providing a plurality of flow channels, a sorption material operatively attached to each of said substrate support members and a catalyst operatively attached to each of said substrate support members. The sorption material reduces the carbon monoxide content when the PrOx is operating within a first temperature range and the catalyst reduces the carbon monoxide in conjunction with the sorption material when PrOx is operating within a second temperature range.
The first temperature range is generally defined as the light-off temperature, being approximately <100° C. The second temperature range is generally defined as the “normal” PrOx operating temperature, being approximately >100° C., whereby the catalyst is able to catalyze a CO oxidation reaction.
The present invention provides a first advantage by enabling quicker start-up of the PrOx, resulting in a cleaner reformate stream being supplied to the fuel cell stack. A second advantage of the present invention is the easy transition between start-up of the PrOx and normal operation.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
With reference to
The PrOx 8 includes a main reactor section 10 having an inlet conduit 12 conveying the reformate flow into the PrOx 8 and an outlet conduit exhausting the reformate flow from the PrOx 8. The reformate stream entering the PrOx 8 is mixed with oxygen (i.e. air) injected into the stream ahead of the PrOx 8 via a controllable valve 16 and exits the PrOx 8 having a significantly lower CO content. It will be appreciated that the control valve 16 may be replaced by other means, such as a pulsed air injector. The main reactor section 10 further includes a coolant inlet 18 and a coolant outlet 20 that enable respective conveyance and exhaust of a coolant medium for extracting heat from the main reactor section 10 with the reactor section stream flowing therethrough. The PrOx 8 facilitates both CO sorption in the presence of a sorption material, such as, but not limited to hopcalite and zeolite, as well as selective oxidation of CO in the presence of a catalyst, such as an Ir-catalyst. Further, through the cooling medium, the PrOx 8 maintains the main reactor section 10 temperature within a desired range for efficient operation.
With reference to
With particular reference to
With particular reference to
It will be appreciated that the substrate 24 of
In operation, prior to activation (i.e. during a start-up period), the PrOx 8 is initially at a rest temperature, well below 100° C. During this period, the catalyst 42, 46 is inactive, inoperable for reacting the reformate stream to remove CO. However, during the start-up period, the CO-sorption material 40, 44 is active and absorbs CO from the reformate stream as it flows over the substrate 24 and contacts the CO-sorption material 40, 44. Eventually, the PrOx 8 heats to above 100° C., thereby activating the catalyst layer 42, 46, representing the end of the start-up period and the beginning of the normal operation period. During normal operation, the catalyst 42, 46 enables reaction of the reformate stream with oxygen supplied therein, as described above, to reduce the CO count of the reformate stream. Concurrently, heat from the catalytic reactions enable desorption of the CO that had been previously absorbed by the CO-sorption layer 40, 44 for reaction with the oxygen. In this manner, the CO-sorption material 40, 44 is effectively “cleaned” of CO, and further CO-sorption during a subsequent start-up period is enabled.
The description of the present invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3067002 | Reid | Dec 1962 | A |
3939062 | Sinfelt et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4172817 | Yates et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4303552 | Ernest et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4377495 | Tse | Mar 1983 | A |
4417083 | Bernard et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4447551 | Fung et al. | May 1984 | A |
4514284 | Wairegi et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4517076 | Boyle et al. | May 1985 | A |
4518708 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 1985 | A |
4537839 | Cameron | Aug 1985 | A |
4994247 | Tooley et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5009872 | Chuang et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5017357 | Kolts et al. | May 1991 | A |
5114901 | Tsang et al. | May 1992 | A |
5200375 | Dessau | Apr 1993 | A |
5202299 | Symons et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5238670 | Louise et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5248566 | Kumar et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5271916 | Vanderborgh et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5316871 | Swathirajan et al. | May 1994 | A |
5482680 | Wilkinson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492679 | Ament et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5518705 | Buswell et al. | May 1996 | A |
5609832 | Mieville et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612012 | Soma et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5637415 | Meltser et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5702838 | Yasumoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6162558 | Borup et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6245214 | Rehg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6528032 | Nojima et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6576203 | Abe et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6692545 | Gittleman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6964692 | Gittleman et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969505 | Tonkovich et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 764 466 | Mar 1997 | EP |
53109874 | Sep 1978 | JP |
25611295 | Oct 1995 | JP |
10130398 | Apr 1998 | JP |
26142598 | Sep 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040148861 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |