The present disclosure relates generally to mechanical couplings and, more particularly, to hinge mechanisms and systems useful primarily in swinging doors.
Swinging doors (as opposed to sliding doors) are typically mounted on hinges that permit the doors to pivotally swing as the door opens and closes. Double-acting doors, in which the door can swing open in two directions, both inwardly and outwardly, have a limited opening angle. In other words, double-acting doors typically do not open to a full 180 degrees in both directions. Rather, the angle at which the door can open is generally significantly limited by the door making physical contact with the jamb. The limited angle results in inefficient use of space by limiting or otherwise impeding traffic flow in many applications. For instance, opening a conventional double-acting door in areas with significant traffic will present an obstruction to cross-traffic and otherwise impede the efficient flow of traffic in the general area of the door.
In addition, typically the door panels, hinges and jambs of conventional doors frequently have potentially damaging loads placed on them. For example, when a conventional door is opened and makes physical contact with the jamb, thus limiting its travel, force typically continues to be applied to the door, resulting in a potentially damaging load being placed on the door panel, the hinges and the jamb.
Further, the door, hinges and jambs of conventional double-action and other doors undergo considerable stress when a door at rest is subjected to a sudden hard impact, thus placing a potentially damaging load directly on the door, hinges and the jamb. Accordingly, the door, hinges and jamb of a conventional door, which lacks a mechanism to effectively absorb the force of such impacts, are subject to significantly greater stresses than a comparable door possessing such an impact absorbing mechanism. Naturally, the cumulative effect of the increased loads caused by, e.g., sudden impacts and loads resulting from attempts to push the door open beyond its limited opening angle, can cause failure, malfunction or otherwise significantly shorten the useful life of the door, hinges and jamb.
In view of these deficiencies, a need exists in the art for a hinge-mechanism which allows a door to swing open to a full 180 degrees, and a particular need exists for a hinge-mechanism which allows a double-acting door to open a full 180 degrees in both directions. A further need exists in the art for a hinge mechanism capable of eliminating, cushioning or absorbing the potentially damaging loads that are regularly placed on doors, door hinges and door jambs during the course of their everyday use.
The present invention provides improvements over conventional double-acting traffic doors and door mounts in that its design allows for a door, including a double-acting door, to open a full 180 degrees in both directions. The design of the present invention also functions to cushion or absorb potentially damaging loads which are regularly placed on doors, including double-acting doors. Other advantages will be disclosed and/or apparent from the following disclosure.
The present invention provides a dual-hinge or “double-knuckle” spine/hinge system which allows a traffic door to open a full 180 degrees in both directions from its closed position. This permits the door to be flush with a wall that is adjacent to the door, thereby minimally obstructing hallways and/or other traffic areas into which the door opens. Accordingly, the present invention significantly increases the efficient use of limited space.
The unique hinge mechanism of the present invention also effectively provides a cushion against sudden impacts on the door. For example, when the door experiences a hard impact while it is closed, the dual-hinge mechanism gives way momentarily, effectively absorbing or cushioning the forces of the impact. This cushioning can reduce or eliminate any damage that may normally occur in the absence of such a dual-hinge mechanism.
Moreover, it is well known that the hinge and jamb sections of a conventional door are common failure points. The dual-hinge mechanism of the present invention reduces the stresses from loads that are commonly placed on the door and jamb due to frequent opening and closing, including attempts to open the door further after it has made contact with the jamb. The reduced stress results in less frequent failures at the hinge and/or jamb, since these loads are now distributed over two hinge mechanisms.
Specifically, the present invention provides a mechanism for mounting a door comprising a door and a means for pivoting the door up to about 180 degrees in either direction from the closed position. In one embodiment of the present invention, the pivoting means includes a primary spine element having a first end, a second end, a top and a bottom, the primary spine being pivotally coupled at one end to a jamb; a secondary spine element having a first end, a second end, a top and a bottom, the secondary spine being pivotally coupled at the first end to the primary spine, and coupled at the second end to a door.
In operation of a particular embodiment of the present invention, the primary spine element pivots about the bracket until the primary spine element makes physical contact with the door jamb. The physical contact between the primary spine element and the jamb prohibits further pivoting of the primary spine element. Once the primary spine element is prohibited from further pivoting about the bracket, additional force on the door results in the door pivoting around the top and bottom hinges, thus allowing the door to pivot to a full 180 degrees from its closed position.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the mechanism of the present invention is used to mount a double-acting or swinging door.
The design and operation of the present invention, as well as its advantages, will be more fully appreciated upon reference to the following detailed description having reference to the accompanied drawings.
Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. All of the components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Referring to
At the jamb end 510, the top 530 includes an upper bracket 520a while the bottom 535 includes a lower bracket 520b. The upper bracket 520a and the lower bracket 520b permit mounting of the spine 505 to a door jamb (not shown in
Similarly, at the door end 515, the top 530 includes an upper hinge 525a and the bottom 535 includes a lower hinge 525b. The upper hinge 525a and the lower hinge 525b permit mounting of a door (not shown in
While the pivot angle of the spine 505 with reference to the jamb is limited, and the pivot angle of the door with reference to the spine 505 is also limited, the combined pivot angles permit the door to swing open at a full 180 degrees in either direction with reference to the jamb. In other words, the aggregate of the pivot angles (i.e., the combination of spine 505 and the jamb, as well as the door and the spine 505) provides a mechanism by which the door can swing open to a 180-degree angle, either inwardly and/or outwardly, from its fully closed position.
To illustrate the operation of such a hinge mechanism, a top view of the hinge mechanism is provided with reference to
For clarity of illustration, the jamb 605 is specifically drawn as an 8 inch jamb. However, it should be appreciated that the dimensions of the jamb 605 can be altered without detrimental effect on the operation of the dual-hinge mechanism.
The remaining drawings (
The dual-hinge mechanism, as described above, permits a door to open to a full 180 degrees in either direction from its closed position. This permits the door to be flush with a wall that is adjacent to the door, thereby minimally obstructing hallways and/or other traffic areas into which the door opens.
Additionally, the hinge mechanism, as described above, effectively provides a cushion against sudden impacts on the door. For example, when the door experiences a hard impact while it is at rest in the closed position, the dual-hinge mechanism gives way momentarily to absorb or cushion the impact. This cushioning can reduce any damage that may normally occur in the absence of such a dual-hinge mechanism.
Lastly, as is known, the hinge and or jamb part of a conventional door is a common failure point. The dual-hinge mechanism, as described above, reduces the stresses that are commonly placed on the door and jamb due to frequent opening and closing. The reduced stress results in less frequent failures at the hinge and or jamb, since this load is now distributed over two hinge mechanisms.
Although exemplary embodiments have been shown and described in detail for purposes of clarity, it will be clear to those of ordinary skill in the art from a reading of the disclosure that various changes in form or detail, modifications, or other alterations to the invention as described may be made without departing from the true scope of the invention in the appended claims. For example, while specific dimensions for a hinge mechanism and a door are shown, it should be appreciated that changes to the dimensions of the hinge mechanism and/or the door will not detract from the inventive concept. Accordingly, all such changes, modifications, and alterations should be seen as within the scope of the disclosure.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/675,560, filed on Apr. 27, 2005, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60675560 | Apr 2005 | US |