This application claims the priority benefit of Italian Application for Patent No. 102019000003331, filed on Mar. 7, 2019, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety to the maximum extent allowable by law.
The description relates to power management circuits such as voltage regulators. Low dropout (LDO) linear voltage regulators are exemplary of circuits to which embodiments described herein may apply.
Low dropout regulators (LDOs) provide a simple, inexpensive way of regulating an output voltage derived from a higher voltage input. The designation “dropout voltage” applies to the lowest (minimum) voltage across the regulator for which regulation can be maintained satisfactorily. For instance, an input voltage of (at least) 5.5 V applied to a 5 V regulator corresponds to a dropout voltage of 0.5 V.
An area of increasingly extended use of such voltage regulators is the automotive field. For instance, off-board sensors and small current off-board modules for automotive applications may benefit from systems where both protection and output accuracy is provided for power supplies in arrangements where the power is delivered through a long cable from a main board.
Also, the ability to keep a low voltage tracking tolerance between a power supply for off-board sensors (auxiliary supply) and a main power supply (for supplying microcontroller units—MCUs and/or analog-to-digital converters—ADCs, for instance) facilitates integrity of voltage signals and thus represents a desirable feature. Low tolerances in tracking systems (that is, systems where an auxiliary supply “tracks” the voltage from a main power supply) facilitate robust driving operation.
A conventional approach in addressing these issues may involve a single voltage tracker LDO or a dual arrangement where an auxiliary voltage regulator “tracks” a main voltage regulator. Practical implementations of that approach may involve an external integrated circuit (IC) to track the primary regulated voltage, which may have a negative impact in terms of cost and space.
Despite the extensive activity in this area, further improved solutions are desirable.
One or more embodiments may provide a dual LDO voltage regulator with independent output voltage selection and the capability of providing voltage tracking selectively.
In one or more embodiments, tracking mode operation may start when the input values for the desired output voltages are the same for a main and an auxiliary voltage regulator. That is, in one or more embodiments, two regulated outputs can be configured to be different and in that case voltage tracking operation is avoided.
If an overvoltage event is detected on the main regulated voltage, tracking mode operation is avoided (that is, not enabled or discontinued) with the second (auxiliary) voltage regulator operated independently of the main voltage regulator. Not enabling tracking mode operation may be helpful, for instance, in the case of a power up operation accompanied by an output overvoltage. Discontinuing tracking mode operation may be helpful, for instance, in the case of an output overvoltage with two LDOs configured to provide a same output voltage.
In both cases a negative impact on the auxiliary voltage regulator can thus be avoided by via such a “de-tracking” action.
One or more embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the annexed figures wherein:
In the ensuing description, one or more specific details are illustrated, aimed at providing an in-depth understanding of examples of embodiments of this description. The embodiments may be obtained without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other cases, known structures, materials, or operations are not illustrated or described in detail so that certain aspects of embodiments will not be obscured.
Reference to “an embodiment” or “one embodiment” in the framework of the present description is intended to indicate that a particular configuration, structure, or characteristic described in relation to the embodiment is comprised in at least one embodiment. Hence, phrases such as “in an embodiment” or “in one embodiment” that may be present in one or more points of the present description do not necessarily refer to one and the same embodiment. Moreover, particular conformations, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any adequate way in one or more embodiments.
The references used herein are provided merely for convenience and hence do not define the extent of protection or the scope of the embodiments.
As shown by way of example in
As shown by way of example in
As shown by way of example in
This may occur, for instance, according to an exemplary table reproduced below.
In the table reproduced above, SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 (with x=1, 2, or 3) indicate possible binary values (“0” or “1”) applied to the pins SEL1_LDO1, SEL2_LDO1, SEL3_LDO1 and SEL1_LDO2, SEL2_LDO2 and SEL3_LDO2.
It will be appreciated that in one or more embodiments the number of output voltage selection pins SELx (x=1, 2, . . . , n) may be different from the number three (n=3) exemplified herein. In general, 2n different values can be provided for the output voltages at the output pins OUT_LDO1, OUT_LDO2 with the value of the output voltage at each voltage regulator output OUT_LDO1, OUT_LDO2, . . . being selectable via a combination of the binary values applied to a respective set of selection pins SELx.
Such binary values can be applied to the selection pins SELx, for instance by coupling resistors such as R1, R2 to “pull” the selection pins to a voltage selected between a reference voltage Vs (logic “1”) and ground voltage (logic “0”).
Also, while two output voltages Vo1, Vo2 and two output pins OUT_LDO1 and OUT_LDO2 are exemplified for the sake of simplicity, a multi-output voltage regulator 10 as exemplified herein may in fact provide regulated output voltages in excess of two.
The exemplary representation of
These pins exemplified in
A dual voltage regulator 10 as exemplified herein (taken as exemplary of a multi-output voltage regulator) may thus be regarded—at least notionally—as including at least one first voltage regulator LDO1 and at least one second voltage regulator LDO2.
In one or more embodiments, in providing their output voltages Vo1, Vo2 at the outputs OUT_LDO1 and OUT_LDO2 as a function of the (binary) values applied to the output voltage selection pins SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2, these regulators LDO1 and LDO2 may operate in at least two different modes as schematically represented in
One or more embodiments are primarily related to the possibility of facilitating operation of a multi-output voltage regulator 10 in (at least) two different modes, namely:
For instance, by referring to the table reproduced in the foregoing, assuming that the same digital value or configuration (for instance “111”) is applied to both sets of selection pins SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2, in the tracking mode of operation the output voltage Vo2 from LDO2 will “track” the 5 V voltage Vo1 from LDO1.
The block diagram of
In the block diagram of
The logic driver 12 can be configured (as further discussed in the following) to identify a condition of identity of the binary configurations applied to the two sets of output voltage selection pins SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 and to activate a differential stage such as an operation amplifier (briefly OpAmp) 14 via an activation signal VCC_OP1.
The differential stage 14 receives at its inverting/non-inverting inputs the voltages Vo1, Vo2 expected to be provided at the output pins OUT_LDO1, OUT_LDO2 which can be generated (in any manner known to those of skill in the art) to be equal insofar that—in the case considered—the binary voltage selection values applied to the two sets of output voltage selection pins SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 are assumed to be identical. The output from the differential stage 14 can thus act (via a separation diode 14a, for instance) on an output switch 16 (a power MOSFET transistor, for instance) so that the voltage Vo2 provided at the output pin OUT_LDO2 merely “tracks” the (identical) voltage Vo1 provided at the output pin OUT_LDO1.
Such a “tracking” mode of operation corresponds to the mode of operation which is adopted in the voltage regulator in the condition exemplified in
Tracking mode operation facilitates uniformity of signal levels (within an electronic control unit, for instance, by avoiding possible misinterpretation of information acquired by a microcontroller, for instance). As discussed herein, tracking mode operation may be adopted when the LDOs involved are configured to provide a same output voltage level.
Tracking mode operation may be exposed to the risk that an overvoltage event affecting the voltage Vo1 at the output pin OUT_LDO1 may correspondingly affect the (identical) voltage Vo2 resulting from the tracking action and provided at the output pin OUT_LDO2.
In one or more embodiments, that risk may be countered by providing an overvoltage sensor (for instance, an overvoltage warning generator 18, of any type known to those skill in the art) which is sensitive to the voltage Vo1 at the output pin OUT_LDO1 and is configured, as a result of detecting an overvoltage event at LDO1, to issue an overvoltage signal OV1 towards the logic driver 12.
In one or more embodiments, the logic driver 12 is configured to act in such a way as to avoid tracking mode operation if occurrence of such an overvoltage event is detected by the sensor 18—even in those cases where the configurations of binary values applied to the two sets of output voltage selection pins SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 are identical.
This may occur by an activation signal VCC_OP2 being issued towards a differential stage 20 (again an OpAmp, for instance) which is configured to act, for instance via a separation diode 20a, on the power switch 16 in such a way that the output voltage Vo2 is provided at the output pin OUT_LDO2 by the differential stage 20 independently of—that is without tracking—the differential stage 14.
As exemplified herein, this may occur as a function of a reference voltage VREF and a desired value for the output voltage VO2 as received, for instance, via a potential divider (DIV) 22.
Such an “independent” mode of operation (a mode of operation where the output voltage VO2 is provided via the differential stage 20, for instance) corresponds to the mode of operation adopted in the voltage regulator in the condition exemplified in
If such an “independent” mode of operation is adopted, overvoltage events affecting the output voltage Vo1 at the output pin OUT_LDO1 will not affect the (otherwise identical) output voltage Vo2 at output pin OUT_LDO2.
As exemplified in
In embodiments as exemplified herein, issuance of the signals VCC_OP1 and VCC_OP2 may be due to either one of the switches SW1 or SW2 being brought to a conductive, “on” state by the driver 120, thus coupling the respective stage 14 or 20 to a supply source Vcc which may correspond to Vbat in
In embodiments as exemplified herein, the switching driver 120 is sensitive to the (binary) output voltage selection values applied to the selection pins SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 and to the signal OV1 from the overvoltage sensor 18.
As discussed previously, this latter signal may be indicative of an overvoltage event detected at the first voltage regulator LDO1 (voltage Vo1 at the output pin OUT_LDO1).
The diagram of
In one or more embodiments, the driver 120 may comprise a memory circuit block 1202 configured as a look-up table (LUT) wherein the binary values or combinations applied to the output voltage selection pins SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 are stored. The look-up table 1202 is coupled to a power module 1204 which controls the switches SW1, SW2 via activation signals SW1_DIG and SW_DIG2.
In one or more embodiments, the activation signal SW1_DIG (activation of the differential stage 14) for the switch SW1 may be issued via an overvoltage control circuit 1206 sensitive to the signal OV1 from the sensor 18.
In one or more embodiments, the activation signal SW2_DIG (activation of the differential stage 20) for the switch SW2 may be issued via an activation (ACT) block 1208 possibly coupled (also) to the overvoltage control circuit (OCC) 1206 in order to facilitate coordination of switching the switches SW1 and SW2 between conductive and non-conductive states in order to avoid undesired simultaneous activation of the stages 14 and 20.
Operation of an arrangement as exemplified herein may be along the lines of the flowchart of
In that flowchart, the block 1000 is generally exemplary of the (dual) voltage regulator 10 being activated, while the block 1002 is exemplary of the digital inputs SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 (x=1, 2, 3) being checked for identity/non-identity (at the LUT 1020, for instance).
If the binary combinations supplied to SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 are found to be different (negative outcome N of block 1002), in an act as represented by block 1004, independent operation of the two voltage regulators LDO1, LDO2 (see
If the binary combinations supplied to SELx_LDO1 and SELx_LDO2 are found to be identical (positive outcome Y of block 1002) in an act as represented by block 1006, a check is made as to whether monitoring the output of the first voltage regulator LDO1 (Vo1 at OUT_LDO1) has revealed any overvoltage event, with a corresponding signal OV1 issued by the sensor 18, for instance.
A negative outcome of such action (negative outcome N of block 1006), indicative of no overvoltage events detected at the first voltage regulator LDO1 (Vo1 at OUT_LDO1), leads to tracking mode operation of the two voltage regulators LDO1, LDO2 (see
This type of operation may be maintained until new sets of output voltage selection binary values SELx_LDO1 and SEL_x LDO2 are checked for identity/non-identity at block 1002.
As exemplified herein, a positive outcome of the act of checking for the occurrence of overvoltage events at LDO1 (positive outcome Y of block 1006, which is exemplary of an overvoltage event detected by the sensor 18 with a corresponding signal VO1 sent towards the switching driver 120) results in tracking mode operation being avoided, with the switch SW2 closed by the switching driver 120 so that the signal VCC_OP2 is issued towards the differential stage 20 to produce “independent” operation of the two voltage regulators LDO1, LDO2 as exemplified in
In that way, as discussed previously, negative effects on the voltage regulator LDO2 can be avoided by via such a “de-tracking” action.
The flowchart of
It will be appreciated that in or more embodiments the occurrence of an overvoltage event as detected at 1006 may lead to tracking mode operation being avoided—by disabling—tracking mode operation already entered into.
This alternative approach may correspond to operation where (as an alternative to the flowchart shown in
A circuit (for instance, 10) as exemplified herein may comprise:
at least one first voltage regulator (for instance, LDO1) having a first output voltage selection pin set (for instance, SEL1_LDO1, SEL2_LDO1, SEL3_LDO1), the at least one first voltage regulator configured to receive a first digital signal at the first output voltage selection pin set and activatable (suited to be activated) to produce a first output voltage (for instance, Vo1 at OUT_LDO1) which is a function of the first digital signal received at the first output voltage selection pin set,
at least one second voltage regulator (for instance, LDO2) having a second output voltage selection pin set (for instance, SEL1_LDO2, SEL2_LDO2, SEL3_LDO2), the at least one second voltage regulator configured to receive a second digital signal at the second output voltage selection pin set and activatable (suited to be activated) to produce a second output voltage (for instance, Vo2 at OUT_LDO2) which is a function of the second digital signal received at the second output voltage selection pin set,
wherein the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator are operable (see for instance block 1008 in
an overvoltage sensor (for instance, 18) configured to detect overvoltage events occurring at the at least one first voltage regulator, and
control circuitry (for instance, 12) coupled to the overvoltage sensor, the control circuitry configured to avoid (see for instance, 1004) operation of the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator in the voltage tracking mode as a result of an overvoltage event (for instance, OV1) detected (for instance, 1006) at the at least one first voltage regulator.
In a circuit as exemplified herein, with operation in the voltage tracking mode avoided (for instance, 1004), the at least one second voltage regulator may be configured (see, for instance, 20, 20a, VCC_OP2) to produce said second output voltage which is a function of the second digital signal received at the second output voltage selection pin set independently of the at least one first voltage regulator.
In a circuit as exemplified herein:
the control circuitry may be coupled to the first output voltage selection pin set in the at least one first voltage regulator and to the second output voltage selection pin set in the at least one second voltage regulator,
the control circuitry may be configured to avoid operation of the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator in the voltage tracking mode:
a) as a result of the first digital signal received at the first output voltage selection pin set and the second digital signal received at the second output voltage selection pin set having different values (for instance, negative outcome N of 1002 in
b) as a result of an overvoltage event detected (for instance, 1006) at the at least one first voltage regulator with the first digital signal received at the first output voltage selection pin set and the second digital signal received at the second output voltage selection pin set having a same value (for instance, positive outcome Y of 1002 in
In a circuit as exemplified herein, the control circuitry may comprise:
a power supply node (for instance, Vcc),
a first switch (for instance, SW1) configured to be switched to a conductive state to couple the at least one first voltage regulator (for instance LDO1, stage 14) to the power supply node, and
a second switch (for instance, SW2) configured to be switched to a conductive state to couple the at least one second voltage regulator (for instance, LDO2, stage 20) to the power supply node.
A circuit as exemplified herein may comprise:
a memory circuit block (for instance, 1202) configured to store the first digital signal received at the first output voltage selection pin set of the at least one first voltage regulator and the second digital signal received at the second output voltage selection pin set of the at least one second voltage regulator,
switch control circuitry (for instance, 1204, 1206, 1208) coupled to the memory circuit block and the overvoltage sensor (for instance, 18), the switch control circuitry configured to switch to a conductive state the first switch and the second switch as a function of the first digital signal, the second digital signal stored in the memory circuit block and an overvoltage signal being received from the overvoltage sensor circuitry as a result of an overvoltage event occurring at the at least one first voltage regulator.
A method of operating a circuit as exemplified herein may comprise:
checking (for instance, 1002) for identity the first digital signal at the first output voltage selection pin set and the second digital signal at the second output voltage selection pin set,
as a result of a negative outcome of said checking for identity, enabling (for instance, 1004) independent operation of the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator, wherein the at least one first voltage regulator produces a first output voltage which is a function of the first digital signal received at the first output voltage selection pin set, and wherein the at least one second voltage regulator produces a second output voltage which is a function of the second digital signal received at the second output voltage selection pin set,
as a result of a positive outcome of said checking for identity, checking (for instance, 1006) said overvoltage sensor for the occurrence of an overvoltage event at the at least one first voltage regulator, and
a) if checking said overvoltage sensor indicates an overvoltage event at the at least one first voltage regulator (for instance, positive outcome at 1006), avoiding voltage tracking mode operation of the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator by enabling (for instance, again 1004) independent operation of the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator, wherein the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator produce a first output voltage and a second output voltage which are a function of the mutually identical first digital signal at the first output voltage selection pin set and the second digital signal at the second output voltage selection pin set,
b) if checking said overvoltage sensor fails to indicate an overvoltage event at the at least one first voltage regulator (for instance, negative outcome at 1006), enabling (for instance, 1008) voltage tracking mode operation of the at least one first voltage regulator and the at least one second voltage regulator, with the second output voltage of the at least one second voltage regulator tracking the first output voltage of the at least one first voltage regulator.
The claims are an integral part of the technical disclosure of the embodiments provided herein. Without prejudice to the underlying principles the details and embodiments may vary, even significantly, without departing from the scope of protection.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6201375 | Larson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6894470 | Umemoto | May 2005 | B2 |
7274114 | Wong | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7276885 | Tagare | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7336058 | Lo | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7723969 | Li | May 2010 | B1 |
20020135339 | Tang | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040070276 | Liu | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20080278124 | Aiura et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20140223205 | Muthukaruppan | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20180188753 | Derman | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180198416 | Hur | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190372460 | Cuenca | Dec 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202009418 | Oct 2011 | CN |
108427462 | Aug 2018 | CN |
109298744 | Feb 2019 | CN |
3015943 | May 2016 | EP |
Entry |
---|
IT Search Report and Written Opinion for IT Appl. 102019000003331 dated Nov. 27, 2019 (9 pages). |
First Office Action and Search Report for co-pending CN Appl. No. 202010151991.9 dated Jul. 9, 2021 (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200285259 A1 | Sep 2020 | US |