To accommodate weather observation and air surveillance requirements concurrently, the MPAR has been proposed as a solution. Since each function demands precise features, radar components are being upgraded to meet stringent requirements such as matched co-polarization patterns, highly-isolated dual polarization, and low cross-polarization level over the entire frequency bandwidth.
Dual linear-polarized antennas have been introduced as an appropriate solution to meet the aforementioned requirements and are undergoing significant developments. Microstrip patch antennas, owing to their low profile and ease of fabrication, make up a large percentage of such proposed dual-polarized antennas. Based on their feeding techniques, they can be categorized into different types: microstrip-fed, probe-fed, and aperture-coupled antennas. The highest isolation reported in microstrip-fed and probe-fed antennas is 30 dB. Feedline parasitic interference and stimulation of higher-order modes degrade the polarization purity in microstrip-fed and probe-fed antennas. Aperture-coupled antennas sacrifice some antenna features such as gain, simplicity, and low back lobe radiation to achieve a high level of isolation. Various aperture configurations have been suggested and up to 35 dB port-to-port isolation has been reported. To further enhance isolation and cross-polarization levels, differential feed methods have been studied. However, the implementation of two differential feeds in a single layer is challenging and it often results in gain loss, larger antenna area, or bulky multilayer structures.
Similar orthogonal structures such as cross dipoles and cross slots form another category. One proposed non-planar cross dipole provides 34 dB port-to-port isolation. However, due to a high sensitivity to fabrication tolerances, the antenna cross-polarization is severely degraded. In contrast, an easy-to-fabricate printed dipole with 35 dB port-to-port isolation was reported to suffer from collocation of co- and cross-polarization peaks in radiation pattern.
Thus the design of a dual-polarization antenna with high isolation between ports has always been a challenge to antenna designers. The novel antenna configurations of the present disclosure address the deficiencies of the previously proposed antenna designs.
Several embodiments of the present disclosure are hereby illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted however, that the appended drawings only illustrate several embodiments and are therefore not intended to be considered limiting of the scope of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure is directed to a dual linear polarized dipole antenna (and arrays of such antennas) having high isolation between ports. The antenna comprises, in a non-limiting embodiment, a pair of crossed (collocated) bent (angled) dipole antenna elements which are excited by a unique dual-polarized feeding structure. The antenna elements may be printed. Stripline feeding along with substantially symmetrical and substantially identical radiative (e.g., “radiating”) elements results in high level of port isolation. Sub-ground planes positioned about the stripline on both sides of the balun block, limit, or reduce parasitic stripline radiation, thereby improving polarization purity (e.g., resulting in pure polarization). Polarization purity is additionally reinforced by the principal ground plane which isolates the radiative elements from the baluns. In certain embodiments, the crossed dipole antennas described herein have a match between parameters S11 and S22, high port isolation over a wider bandwidth, and a high match between corresponding E-plane and H-plane patterns. Due to substantially identical radiating structures (e.g., radiative elements), similar co-polarization patterns are achieved, which is an appropriate feature for weather applications. The antennas may be constructed using inexpensive printed circuit board (PCB) technology. The antennas and antenna arrays of the present disclosure may be used for weather observation and air surveillance in non-limiting embodiments.
Before describing various embodiments of the present disclosure in more detail by way of exemplary description, examples, and results, it is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited in application to the details of methods and compositions as set forth in the following description. The present disclosure is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. As such, the language used herein is intended to be given the broadest possible scope and meaning; and the embodiments are meant to be exemplary, not exhaustive. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting unless otherwise indicated as so. Moreover, in the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, it will be apparent to a person having ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments of the present disclosure may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, features which are well known to persons of ordinary skill in the art have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessary complication of the description.
Unless otherwise defined herein, scientific and technical terms used in connection with the present disclosure shall have the meanings that are commonly understood by those having ordinary skill in the art. Further, unless otherwise required by context, singular terms shall include pluralities and plural terms shall include the singular.
All patents, published patent applications, and non-patent publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art to which the present disclosure pertains. All patents, published patent applications, and non-patent publications referenced in any portion of this application are herein expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual patent or publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
As utilized in accordance with the methods and compositions of the present disclosure, the following terms, unless otherwise indicated, shall be understood to have the following meanings:
The use of the word “a” or “an” when used in conjunction with the term “comprising” in the claims and/or the specification may mean “one,” but it is also consistent with the meaning of “one or more,” “at least one,” and “one or more than one.” The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or when the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and “and/or.” The use of the term “at least one” will be understood to include one as well as any quantity more than one, including but not limited to, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, or any integer inclusive therein. The term “at least one” may extend up to 100 or 1000 or more, depending on the term to which it is attached; in addition, the quantities of 100/1000 are not to be considered limiting, as higher limits may also produce satisfactory results. In addition, the use of the term “at least one of X, Y and Z” will be understood to include X alone, Y alone, and Z alone, as well as any combination of X, Y and Z.
As used herein, all numerical values or ranges include fractions of the values and integers within such ranges and fractions of the integers within such ranges unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Thus, to illustrate, reference to a numerical range, such as 1-10 includes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, as well as 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, etc., and so forth. Reference to a range of 1-50 therefore includes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, etc., up to and including 50, as well as 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, etc., 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, etc., and so forth. Reference to a series of ranges includes ranges which combine the values of the boundaries of different ranges within the series. Thus, to illustrate reference to a series of ranges, for example, of 1-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-75, 75-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-250, 250-300, 300-400, 400-500, 500-750, 750-1,000, includes ranges of 1-20, 10-50, 50-100, 100-500, and 500-1,000, for example. A reference to degrees such as 1 to 90 is intended to explicitly include all degrees in the range.
As used herein, the words “comprising” (and any form of comprising, such as “comprise” and “comprises”), “having” (and any form of having, such as “have” and “has”), “including” (and any form of including, such as “includes” and “include”) or “containing” (and any form of containing, such as “contains” and “contain”) are inclusive or open-ended and do not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.
The term “or combinations thereof” as used herein refers to all permutations and combinations of the listed items preceding the term. For example, “A, B, C, or combinations thereof” is intended to include at least one of: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC, and if order is important in a particular context, also BA, CA, CB, CBA, BCA, ACB, BAC, or CAB. Continuing with this example, expressly included are combinations that contain repeats of one or more item or term, such as BB, AAA, AAB, BBC, AAABCCCC, CBBAAA, CABABB, and so forth. The skilled artisan will understand that typically there is no limit on the number of items or terms in any combination, unless otherwise apparent from the context.
Throughout this application, the term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the inherent variation of error. Further, in this detailed description, each numerical value (e.g., temperature or time) should be read once as modified by the term “about” (unless already expressly so modified), and then read again as not so modified unless otherwise indicated in context. As noted, any range listed or described herein is intended to include, implicitly or explicitly, any number within the range, particularly all integers, including the end points, and is to be considered as having been so stated. For example, “a range from 1 to 10” is to be read as indicating each possible number, particularly integers, along the continuum between about 1 and about 10. Thus, even if specific data points within the range, or even no data points within the range, are explicitly identified or specifically referred to, it is to be understood that any data points within the range are to be considered to have been specified, and that the inventors possessed knowledge of the entire range and the points within the range. The use of the term “about” may mean a range including ±10% of the subsequent number unless otherwise stated.
As used herein, the term “substantially” means that the subsequently described parameter, event, or circumstance completely occurs or that the subsequently described parameter, event, or circumstance occurs to a great extent or degree. For example, the term “substantially” means that the subsequently described parameter, event, or circumstance occurs at least 90% of the time, or at least 91%, or at least 92%, or at least 93%, or at least 94%, or at least 95%, or at least 96%, or at least 97%, or at least 98%, or at least 99%, of the time, or means that the dimension or measurement is within at least 90%, or at least 91%, or at least 92%, or at least 93%, or at least 94%, or at least 95%, or at least 96%, or at least 97%, or at least 98%, or at least 99%, of the referenced dimension or measurement (e.g., length).
As used herein any reference to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular element, feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
The following abbreviations apply:
CPPAR: cylindrical polarimetric phased array radar
dB: decibel(s)
ECC: envelope correlation coefficient
GHz: gigahertz
HFSS: high-frequency structure simulator
MHz: megahertz
MIMO: multiple-input and multiple-output
m: meter(s)
mm: millimeter(s)
mm2: squared millimeter(s)
MPAR: multi-function phased array radar
PCB: printed circuit board
SMA: SubMiniature version A
VSWR: voltage standing wave ratio
Ω: ohm(s).
Returning to the detailed description, in one non-limiting embodiment of the antenna, a balun comprising parallel feed lines is designed for MPAR in the frequency bandwidth of (but not limited to) 2.7-3 GHz. To increase or maximize the polarization purity of the antenna and to reduce, limit, or eliminate the parasitic radiation of the balun, the radiating element is isolated from the balun by a set of ground planes (principal ground plane and sub-ground planes). A return loss exceeding 10 dB and a measured port-to-port isolation of 52 dB, over the whole bandwidth, are achieved. The cross-polarization pattern remains 40 dB below the co-polarization peak in the principal planes. The peak of the co-polarization coincides with the null of the cross-polarization with a difference of 50 dB, which makes it a good (or an ideal) solution for weather applications and array performance. High isolation along with low ECC enable the antenna to perform appropriately in MIMO applications as well.
Having a compact geometry, a plurality of the disclosed antennas can readily be extended to form a linear array having dual polarization. In one embodiment, the crossed dipoles comprise an angular bend (e.g., 30° deflection from a horizontal line) for achieving a wider scan element pattern. The antenna maintains an active VSWR less than 2:1 at 2.7-3 GHz while scanning up to ±45° in E-plane. A unique configuration of elements may be employed in the linear array, reducing the cross-polarization in principal planes down to −40 dB below the co-polarization peak while scanning up to ±45° in the E-plane. In one non-limiting example, a linear array of eight antenna elements was fabricated for simulation studies.
The inventive concepts of the present disclosure will now be discussed in terms of several specific, non-limiting examples. The examples described below, which include particular embodiments, will serve to illustrate the practice of the present disclosure, it being understood that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of particular embodiments of the present disclosure only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be a useful and readily understood description of construction procedures as well as of the principles and conceptual aspects of the inventive concepts.
Theory and Design
In at least one embodiment, the total balun length of the balun 32 is unequal to the total balun length of the balun 72. In an alternate embodiment of a crossed-dipole antenna with a different balun configuration, the total balun length of the first balun is equal to the total balun length of the second balun, e.g., see
An implementation of a design of one non-limiting embodiment of an example of a crossed-dipole antenna of the present disclosure is illustrated in
In Table 1, L represents the length of the dipole (e.g., the length of the radiating arms 22, 24 of the first dipole element 20), W represents the width of the dipole (e.g. the width of the radiating arms 22, 24), LG represents the length of the principal ground plane (e.g., the principal ground plane 55 of
To illustrate how the crossed-dipole antenna can achieve a high level of isolation, the major contributors to the cross coupling between the dipoles (e.g., between the first and second dipole elements 20, 60), Saa, Sbb, and Sab, are shown in
Decreasing each of these three coupling components (i.e., Saa, Sbb, Sab) enhances the port-to-port isolation (S12). To implement each of the baluns, the stripline structure is employed. As shown in
Simulation and Measurement Results
Having a group of key parameters, the disclosed crossed-dipole antenna shows versatility to match various frequency range with desired bandwidth. Among them, the length (L) of the radiating arm of the dipole element, its width (W), and its bend angle (Ψ) play the dominant roles.
It has been demonstrated that a theoretical crossed-dipole configuration could be oriented so that the ECC is identically zero. However, the ECC for a physically implemented crossed-dipole is subject to degradation regarding the isolation between dipoles. The higher isolation is achieved, the lower ECC results. To examine the independency between two dipole radiation patterns in the presently disclosed design, the simulated ECC in Ansys HFSS using a far-field-based method with a frequency resolution of 10 MHz and the angular steps of 1 degree was computed and depicted in
To verify the simulation results, the antenna in
The S-parameters of the fabricated antenna was measured using an N5225A network analyzer from Agilent Technologies, calibrated using an E-Cal module.
The antenna pattern was measured in the far field anechoic chamber at the Advanced Radar Research Center of the University of Oklahoma, and the measurement set-up is shown in
The measured and simulated radiation patterns in the E and H principal planes at frequencies of 2.7 GHz, 2.85 GHz, and 3.0 GHz are illustrated in
As noted MPAR is an amalgamation of weather observation and air surveillance radars. CPPAR was introduced for implementation in the MPAR project. Major advantages of CPPAR are azimuthal scan invariant beam and orthogonal polarization. A CPPAR demonstrator comprising a 2 m diameter cylinder populated by 96 columns of frequency scan patch antennas was designed and built. While it is a cost effective solution, the frequency scanning of the apparatus does not allow for full control of the array. Furthermore, different coupling mechanisms between horizontal (H) and vertical (V) ports result in a mismatch between corresponding H- and V-radiation patterns. Finally, the surface wave excited along the grounded dielectric deteriorates the array's functionality.
To improve the performance of the CPPAR, individually excited elements such as a linear array of the crossed-dipole antennas as described herein can be used. Examples of linear arrays of the presently disclosed antennas are shown in
Antenna Design
An isolated dual-polarization array requires an isolated dual-polarized element such as described in detail above in
The parallel transmission lines are attached to differential ports through a cross-shaped slot cut in the principal ground plane. The balun is positioned below the principal ground plane, which blocks the balun's spurious radiations. Further suppression of the balun's parasitic radiations is achieved through utilizing the stripline structure to implement the baluns. That is, a pair of sub-ground planes on both sides of each balun blocks their parasitic radiation and isolates the baluns from each other. Above the principal ground plane, two polarizations also remain isolated owing to orthogonal identical dipoles and parallel transmission lines. Simulated and measured S-parameters of the isolated antenna were discussed and shown in
The element parameters are readjusted and optimized to operate in an array with an active VSWR≤2 from 2.7 to 3 GHz while scanning up to ±45° in E-plane. The balun includes two branches of different lengths, which may be optimized at the center frequency to provide a differential signal to the dipole. Therefore the phase imbalance of the balun is set to zero at 2.85 GHz and increases monotonically up to ±9° toward the beginning and the end of the frequency bandwidth. As such, the peak of the dipoles' co-polarizations at their corresponding E-planes are tilted by ±0.5° and their cross-polarizations increase at these frequencies. In addition to the balun's phase imbalance, its amplitude imbalance along with fabrication tolerances can also impair the symmetry of the dipole radiation pattern in E-plane. Assuming a linear array of the disclosed crossed dipoles, it is problematic for vertical (V) elements in their corresponding E-plane. Accordingly, in order to return the symmetry to a linear array antenna and compensate for the elements' beam tilt, the array may be configured as represented in
Mirrored arrangements of elements in array configuration, though beneficial to cross-polarization reduction, are accompanied by undesirable side lobe problems. Such a problem can appear in some configurations of dual linear polarized patch antenna arrays. The properties of patch radiation patterns which cause such problem are identified and related to the asymmetry of the probe location with respect to the center of the patch antenna. The requirement of the element radiation pattern to avoid the increased side lobe is calculated. Radiation patterns of a symmetrical crossed-dipole antenna which meet the above-mentioned requirement were utilized to form planar arrays with different configurations. It was demonstrated that a simple crossed-dipole array 1420, arranged in mirrored configuration such as shown in
Fabrication and Measurement
To implement the crossed-dipole antenna as illustrated in
The vertical and horizontal radiation patterns of the 8-element linear array antenna at 3 GHz are depicted in
In the embodiment of the antenna shown in
In an alternate embodiment shown in
While the present disclosure has been described in connection with certain embodiments so that aspects thereof may be more fully understood and appreciated, it is not intended that the present disclosure be limited to these particular embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended that all alternatives, modifications and equivalents are included within the scope of the present disclosure. Thus the examples described above, which include particular embodiments, will serve to illustrate the practice of the present disclosure, it being understood that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of particular embodiments only and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of procedures as well as of the principles and conceptual aspects of the presently disclosed methods and compositions. Changes may be made in the structures of the various components described herein, or the methods described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 62/534,062 filed on Jul. 18, 2017 by The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and titled “Dual-Linear Polarized Highly Isolated Crossed Dipole Antenna and Antenna Array,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This application was supported by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under Grant NA11OAR4320072. The government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4686536 | Allcock | Aug 1987 | A |
5280297 | Profera, Jr. | Jan 1994 | A |
6034649 | Wilson | Mar 2000 | A |
20120081259 | Regala | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000151268 | May 2000 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Bao, Zengdi, et al.; “Design and Discussion of a Broadband Cross-Dipole with High Isolation and Low Cross-Polarisation Utilising Strong Mutual Coupling”; IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation; vol. 8, Iss. 5; 2014; 8 pages. |
Croq, Frederic, et al.; “Millimeter-Wave Design of Wide-Band Aperture-Coupled Stacked Microstrip Antennas”; IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation; vol. 39, No. 12; Dec. 1991; 7 pages. |
Gou, Yanshan, et al.; “A Compact Dual-Polarized Printed Dipole Antenna with High Isolation for Wideband Base Station Applications”; IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation; vol. 62, No. 8; Aug. 2014; 4 pages. |
Herd, J., et al.; “Advanced Architecture for a Low Cost Multifunction Phased Array Radar”; IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium; 2010; 4 pages. |
Huynh, T., et al.; “Crosspolarisation Characteristics of Rectangular Patch Antennas”; Electronics Letters; vol. 24, No. 8; Apr. 14, 1988; 2 pages. |
Lindmark, Bjorn; “A Novel Dual Polarized Aperture Coupled Patch Element with a Single Layer Feed Network and High Isolation”; IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium; 1997; 4 pages. |
Mirmozafari, Mirhamed, et al.; “An Overview of Dual Polarized Isolated Antennas”; IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI); 2016; 2 pages. |
Mishra, Prashant K., et al.; “A Review of Broadband Dual Linearly Polarized Microstrip Antenna Designs with High Isolation”; IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine; vol. 56, No. 6; Dec. 2014; 14 pages. |
Rao, Sadasiva M., et al.; “Electromagnetic Radiation and Scattering from Finite Conducting and Dielectric Structures: Surface/Surface Formulation”; IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation; vol. 39, No. 7; Jul. 1991; 4 pages. |
Vaughan, Rodney G., et al.; “Antenna Diversity in Mobile Communications”; IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology; vol. VT-36, No. 4; Nov. 1987; 24 pages. |
Wong, Hang, et al.; “Design of Dual-Polarized L-Probe Patch Antenna Arrays with High Isolation”; IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation; vol. 52, No. 1; Jan. 2004; 8 pages. |
Zhang, Guifu, et al.; “A Cylindrical Polarimetric Phased Array Radar Concept—A Path to Multi-Mission Capability”; IEEE International Symposium on Phased Array Systems and Technology; 2013; 4 pages. |
Zhong, Shun-Shi, et al.; “Corner-Fed Microstrip Antenna Element and Arrays for Dual-Polarization Operation”; IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation; vol. 50, No. 10; Oct. 2002; 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190140364 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62534062 | Jul 2017 | US |