Embodiments of the present invention are generally related to band clamps that include a buckle for interconnection to a band wherein a portion of the band is threaded through the buckle and secured thereto to bundle items together or to affix one item to another.
Band clamps are widely used in a variety of applications. Band clamps generally include a band which is formed into a loop around an object, such as a pole or other object, and a buckle that receives the opposing end of the band. The band and buckle cooperate to lock the band in a fixed position relative to the buckle. Tools are employed to tighten the band around one or more objects, secure or lock a free end of the band relative to a buckle or locking member, and cut any excess portion of the band. Typically, these tools grasp the free end of the band after it has passed through the buckle and apply a force to the free end of the band while simultaneously maintaining the position of the buckle to tighten the band around one or more objects. Once an appropriate tension is applied to the band, the tool will create the desired locking geometry in the band and/or buckle and shear the portion of the free end of the band extending beyond the buckle. Typically, a blade performs the shearing or cutting operation.
Tools that perform the tightening, locking and cutting functions are primarily manual, pneumatic or electric in nature. In the case of pneumatic or electric tools, limited or reduced physical effort is required by the operator as compared to most manual tools. Band tightening tools that are pneumatic or electric are usually semiautomatic in that the operator of such a tool is required to perform some, but not all, of the tasks or functions associated with providing a band clamp about an object. Manual tasks that remain may include locating the band, or tie as it is sometimes called, about the object and inserting or otherwise locating the band clamp relative to the tool so that the tool can perform one or more of its tightening, locking and cutting functions.
Band clamps of the prior art have certain drawbacks. For example, there is a need for improving loop tensile force (the force required to break the band or the lock) other than by simply increasing the physical size of the band and buckle. Also, there is a need for improving the percentage of retained force (the residual force in the band after forming the lock). Stated differently, there is a need to reduce or eliminate the tensile load that is lost following formation of the lock and release of the band by the tool. For a number of reasons, including tolerances and imprecise metal forming techniques, once the tool cuts the free end of the band, a portion of the band tends to slip back through the buckle expanding the circumference of the band. As a result, a portion of the retained tensile load is lost and the percent retained force decreases. The formed lock may also relax or loosen over time, causing the band circumference to expand, particularly if the outward force applied on the band by the constrained objects is large or if the band and buckle are subjected to external forces such as vibration or other motion causing relative motion of the band and buckle. Still further, there is a need in some applications to increase the clamping force (the maximum force reached just prior to the band tightening tool cutting off the excess end of the band). The clamping force is related to the retained force. Typically, the higher the clamping force, the higher the retained force.
In addition to the foregoing problems, other considerations are relevant in designing a band clamp. First, the band clamp should have a high tensile strength to resist the outward tensile force exerted thereon by the constrained object or objects. Second, the band clamp should be inexpensive to manufacture. Band clamps are used in a variety of applications where cost is a concern. Thus, simply increasing the physical size of the band clamp does not address all of the design considerations, including cost constrictions. A physically larger band clamp will have a greater loop tensile force, but it will cost more. In addition, the band clamp should be simple in design and easy to use.
It is one aspect of the present invention to provide a band clamp that is comprised of a band and a buckle and that employs a dual locking feature. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention employ a lip lock and a dimple lock to secure the band around an object or objects. “Lip lock” as used herein refers to a system of bending a portion of the band around an edge of the buckle, thereby fixing the band relative to the buckle. “Dimple” or “Dimple lock” as used herein refers to a system wherein a portion of the band is deformed into an aperture formed in a different portion of the band to maintain the circumference of the band. One of skill in the art will appreciate that the deformation may also interface with the buckle to fix the band relative to the buckle. Traditionally, a lip lock or dimple lock is used exclusive of the other. Embodiments of the present invention combine these two locking methods to yield a band clamp with enhanced performance related to retained force, maximum clamping force, average loop tensile force, etc.
It is another aspect of the present invention to control retaining force, strength and long term reliability of a band clamp described herein by adjusting the depth and/or location of the dimple relative to the portion of the band that receives the dimple and relative to the buckle.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide a band clamp that allows for visual inspection of the dimple quality. In one embodiment, a dimple lock is formed by forcing a punch through an aperture in the buckle to deform the band positioned within the buckle and to create the dimple that locks the band relative to a different portion of the band and relative to the buckle to generally fix the circumference of the band as well as prevent substantial movement of the band relative to the buckle. However, if any or all of the punch, band or buckle are mispositioned, the dimple may be misformed, which can reduce the quality or performance of the dimple lock. Thus it is contemplated that the punch used to form the dimple in the band include an outwardly extending shoulder such that when a dimple is properly made, a ring, visually flat surface or other indicator will be formed in the band adjacent to at least a portion of the perimeter of the dimple. For example, a ring formed completely around the perimeter of the dimple provides a visual indication that the dimple was formed to a proper predetermined depth and at a proper angle relative to the band.
It is yet another aspect of the present invention to provide a locking system that is stronger than the band material. More specifically, the failure mode of prior art band clamps exposed to an expansive force is typically associated with the locking feature of the buckle. For example, band clamps generally fail when the locking lip yields which allows the band to slip relative to the buckle. Alternatively, in the case of a dimple lock, the dimple may simply rupture or shear off also enabling the band to slacken. This can happen because the overlapping layers of band material separate, because the metal forming the dimple is too thin, for both of these reasons, or for other reasons known to those of skill in the art. Embodiments of the present invention include an enhanced locking feature wherein the dimple and lip lock are used in combination to provide an interlocking mechanism that is stronger than the band. Thus the integrity of the locking scheme is enhanced such that the band will deform or fail before the locking features. This failure mode is very predictable since the yield and ultimate stresses of the band are well known. Slackening of the band or complete release due to dimple failure and/or lip deflection is less predictable. However, the visual indicator of dimple quality, referenced previously, will improve prediction of dimple failure.
Often thieves and vandals wish to remove band clamps in order to obtain the items the band clamps are constraining or supporting. For example, often band clamps secure signage, lights or other objects onto poles. These items are often pilfered to later be used as decorations or sold. The lip lock of embodiments of the present invention possess a redundant locking scheme wherein if one lock is circumvented, the other lock will retain the band clamp.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide a buckle that allows for reduction in friction during integration of the band into the buckle. More specifically, as will be apparent to one skilled in the art, synching of a band within a buckle often places side edges of the band in contact with side portions of the buckle. As the band is transitioned through the buckle friction will result, thereby wasting energy that would alternatively be associated with tightening the band. In addition, the band may scrape the inner portion of the buckle as it is synched which may create metal filings that could harm individuals and damage tools. Thus, embodiments of the present invention employ a buckle having a slot formed between a pair of legs wherein the slot and the space between the edges of the buckle legs is increased to a dimension wider than the width of the band. The added space reduces contact and friction between the band and the buckle during tightening. In one embodiment of the present invention a tool is used to create an offset in an upper portion of the buckle wherein material is pushed downwardly to force the legs outwardly to provide the additional space.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide a cable tie that has decreased friction to further increase the efficient use of energy during tightening and clamping. More specifically, bands of embodiments of the present invention are coated with a lubricant, preferably polyethylglycol (PEG). The preferred lubricant is environmentally friendly, as opposed to oil that is generally used. Lubricant influences the interaction between layers of a wrapped band. For example, the less lubrication, the greater the loop tensile force due achieved to the interaction of adjacent band layers that resist motion that would tend to relax the wrapped band. Lubrication, however, PEG also increases the clamping force, retained force and performance repeatability associated with the cable tie by facilitating band/buckle interconnection. Lubrication will reduce energy-wasting frictional interactions between the band and buckle during tensioning and cutting the band. That is, decrease in friction between the band and the buckle translates into more energy that can be applied to clamping force. Lubrication, such as PEG, also extends the shelf life of the band clamps compared to oil-based lubricants that evaporate over time.
It is also an aspect of the present invention to provide a buckle that increases the locking performance of the lip lock. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention include a buckle having a generally 90° edge that engages the portion of the band that forms the lip lock. In this way, the interface between the buckle and the band is a linear edge of the buckle that increases the retaining force compared to band clamps without this feature. Preferably, a “slit-edge” is employed, i.e., an edge that has not been deburred or otherwise machined. Such edges are sharp and dig into the lip to facilitate locking.
It is also an aspect of the present invention to provide a band clamp that possesses a combination of strength, longevity and cost effectiveness by optimizing materials used. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention employ galvanized carbon steel, stainless steel or any alloy.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide a low profile buckle shape that easily fits in to tight spaces.
It is another aspect of the present invention to provide a band clamp that maintains retained force. More specifically, the band relaxation generally associated with the formation of a lip lock is greatly reduced by the presence of the dimple lock. To form a lip lock the band must be cut while under tension. In one embodiment, the blade that severs the band forms the curl or lip by bending the band as part of the cutting operation. In the time between these two actions, which may be very small, the band is able to move relative to the buckle. The presence of the dimple greatly reduces this slackening effect.
The accompanying drawings which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with a general description of the invention given above and the detailed description of the drawings given below, serve to explain the principles of invention.
While the following disclosure describes the invention in connection with those embodiments presented, one should understand that the invention is not strictly limited to these embodiments. Furthermore, one should understand that the drawings are not necessarily to scale, and that in certain instances, the disclosure may not include details which are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention, such as conventional details of fabrication and assembly.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The shoulder 50 will form an indentation in the outer surface of the band that extends around at least a portion of the outer surface of the dimple 62 which provides a visual indication of the proper punch depth and orientation. Preferably, the indentation forms a continuous ring 54 defined by a ridge 56 formed around the punched area 58 and above the lowest portion 59 of the deformation 58. The ridge signals a well-formed or quality dimple. Alternatively, still other embodiments of the present invention may employ a plurality of shoulders, (see
Referring now to
In operation, a band 6 having a buckle 10 associated therewith is positioned adjacent to a light pole 64 or other items being bundled. The buckle 10 is captured by obstructions or nests 14 that are positioned a slight distance apart on the same side of the band to maintain the position of the buckle on the band. Examples of such nests may be found in FIG. 10 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,792. The end 18 of the band is positioned adjacent to the light pole 64 wherein a first wrap 6a is created around light pole. There after, at least one other wrap 6b is positioned around the initially placed wrap 6a. In this example, however, a third wrap 6c is wrapped around the first wrap 6a and second wrap 6b of the band. While the band 6 is under tension, a tool deforms 58 a portion of the band to form a dimple 62 and to also cut and bend 76 the band, as described above. The punch forms a dimple 58 in the third wrap 6c that also deforms the underlying second wrap 6b into the aperture 22 formed in a portion of the first layer of band, thereby locking the circumferential dimension of the band. Depending on the desired dimple depth, a portion of the third wrap 6c may also be deformed such that it extends into the aperture 22. The dimple 62 may also be formed through an aperture 30 of the buckle that is positioned beneath the aperture 22 of the band 6a. In some cases both wraps have portions that are positioned within the aperture 30 of the buckle. In addition, one will appreciate that a single wrap may be formed wherein a greater portion of that wrap is positioned within aperture 30 of the buckle.
With respect to the lip lock, the buckle 10 is locked relative to the band by way of an interaction between the bend 76 and a face 78 of the nest 14. More specifically, expansive forces applied to the inner-diameter of the wrapped band are counteracted by compressive forces acting on the band that are generated by the bend 76 and the face 78.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The foregoing discussion of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the invention to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing description for example, various features of the invention have been identified. It should be appreciated that these features may be combined together into a single embodiment or in various other combinations as appropriate for the intended end use of the band. The dimensions of the component pieces may also vary, yet still be within the scope of the invention. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed invention requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Moreover, though the description of the invention has included description of one or more embodiments and certain variations and modifications, other variations and modifications are within the scope of the invention, e.g. as may be within the skill and knowledge of those in the art, after understanding the present disclosure. It is intended to obtain rights which include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted, including alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps to those claimed, whether or not such alternate, interchangeable and/or equivalent structures, functions, ranges or steps are disclosed herein, and without intending to publicly dedicate any patentable subject matter.
The present invention, in various embodiments, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, subcombinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present invention after understanding the present disclosure. The present invention, in various embodiments, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and\or reducing cost of implementation. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate preferred embodiment of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/985,142, filed Nov. 2, 2007, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 5,483,998, issued Jan. 16, 1996, U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,792, issued Jan. 18, 2000, U.S. Pat. No. 5,123,456, issued Jun. 23, 1992, and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0084022, filed Oct. 17, 2005, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
19709 | Olmstead | Mar 1858 | A |
25125 | Knowles | Aug 1859 | A |
43494 | Hanvey | Jul 1864 | A |
51214 | Quant | Nov 1865 | A |
134052 | Gurley | Dec 1872 | A |
155413 | Boisseau | Sep 1874 | A |
188669 | Pollard | Mar 1877 | A |
193946 | Hamilton | Aug 1877 | A |
204965 | Gilman | Jun 1878 | A |
296686 | Gresham | Apr 1884 | A |
356083 | Schrader et al. | Jan 1887 | A |
359686 | Noyes | Mar 1887 | A |
196432 | Chapman | Oct 1887 | A |
980700 | Swafford | Jan 1911 | A |
997186 | Flora | Jul 1911 | A |
1000083 | Flora | Aug 1911 | A |
1277076 | Ireland | Aug 1918 | A |
RE14762 | Springer | Nov 1919 | E |
1330705 | Herrick | Feb 1920 | A |
1482247 | Nowland | Jan 1924 | A |
1555819 | Baruch | Oct 1925 | A |
1565865 | Ragona | Dec 1925 | A |
1600833 | McChesney | Sep 1926 | A |
1649363 | Parsons | Nov 1927 | A |
1772678 | Newton | Mar 1928 | A |
1670201 | McGary | May 1928 | A |
1712037 | Halter | May 1929 | A |
1849784 | Birch et al. | Mar 1932 | A |
1887732 | Pagel et al. | Nov 1932 | A |
1948719 | King | Feb 1934 | A |
1973823 | Monten | Sep 1934 | A |
1989669 | Harvey | Feb 1935 | A |
1990820 | Flader | Feb 1935 | A |
2007002 | Porter | Jul 1935 | A |
2046634 | Johnson | Jul 1936 | A |
2075720 | Hoffmann | Mar 1937 | A |
2087655 | Prestwich | Jul 1937 | A |
2115736 | McAneny | May 1938 | A |
2118158 | Ott | May 1938 | A |
2192979 | McAneny, Jr. | Mar 1940 | A |
2208114 | Campbell | Jul 1940 | A |
2208134 | McAneny | Jul 1940 | A |
2210510 | Sutton | Aug 1940 | A |
2214110 | Ott | Sep 1940 | A |
D123270 | Mahn | Oct 1940 | S |
2312400 | Govanus | Mar 1943 | A |
2312575 | McKee | Mar 1943 | A |
2318946 | Kass | May 1943 | A |
2324609 | Watt et al. | Jul 1943 | A |
2349608 | Bramble | May 1944 | A |
2426731 | Elliot | Sep 1947 | A |
2536536 | Childress et al. | Jan 1951 | A |
2551384 | Middleton et al. | May 1951 | A |
2643687 | Schlage et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
2837494 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 1958 | A |
2870503 | McAneny | Jan 1959 | A |
2871738 | Abbiati | Feb 1959 | A |
2882934 | Gerrard | Apr 1959 | A |
2928434 | McAneny | Mar 1960 | A |
2967550 | Rosenberger et al. | Jan 1961 | A |
2998629 | Smith | Sep 1961 | A |
3015865 | Rapuzzi | Jan 1962 | A |
3061302 | Dennis | Oct 1962 | A |
3067640 | Lodholm | Dec 1962 | A |
3014256 | Derrickson et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3112496 | Drtiz | Dec 1963 | A |
3117812 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3152621 | Meier | Oct 1964 | A |
3197829 | Caveney et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3241579 | Partridge | Mar 1966 | A |
3242542 | Tako | Mar 1966 | A |
3261062 | Scarborough, Jr. | Jul 1966 | A |
3344815 | Lawson et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3552450 | Plunkett | Jan 1971 | A |
3596686 | Blumenfeld et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3610296 | Kabel | Oct 1971 | A |
3653099 | Hoffman | Apr 1972 | A |
3660869 | Caveney et al. | May 1972 | A |
3682030 | Harris | Aug 1972 | A |
3735784 | Obuch et al. | May 1973 | A |
3748697 | Marchese et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3754303 | Pollock | Aug 1973 | A |
3782426 | Morgan et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3833969 | Hollingsworth et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3837211 | Gress et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3909884 | Weckesser | Oct 1975 | A |
3964133 | Wasserlein, Jr. | Jun 1976 | A |
4015311 | Curtis | Apr 1977 | A |
4041993 | Angarola | Aug 1977 | A |
4047545 | Paradis | Sep 1977 | A |
4056128 | Konrad | Nov 1977 | A |
4083086 | Oetiker | Apr 1978 | A |
4091511 | Reddy | May 1978 | A |
4106799 | Oetiker | Aug 1978 | A |
4128919 | Bulanda et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4222155 | Oetiker | Sep 1980 | A |
4272870 | McCormick | Jun 1981 | A |
4333210 | Burnett | Jun 1982 | A |
4366602 | Conlon et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4390047 | Kaneko | Jun 1983 | A |
4399592 | Chopp, Jr. et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4418448 | Sauer | Dec 1983 | A |
4450032 | Wehr | May 1984 | A |
4473925 | Jansen | Oct 1984 | A |
4492004 | Oetiker | Jan 1985 | A |
4507828 | Furutsu | Apr 1985 | A |
4567626 | Kimbrough | Feb 1986 | A |
4570340 | Shaw | Feb 1986 | A |
4607867 | Jansen | Aug 1986 | A |
4631782 | Gecs | Dec 1986 | A |
4646393 | Young | Mar 1987 | A |
4646591 | Jansen | Mar 1987 | A |
4696327 | Wolcott | Sep 1987 | A |
4726403 | Young et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4733701 | Loisel et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4747433 | Dixon | May 1988 | A |
4765032 | Fortsch | Aug 1988 | A |
4793385 | Dyer et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4887334 | Jansen et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4896402 | Jansen et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4901404 | Mizukoshi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4928738 | Marelin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4934416 | Tonkiss | Jun 1990 | A |
4947901 | Rancour et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4997011 | Dyer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5000232 | Wolcott | Mar 1991 | A |
5007465 | Tonkiss | Apr 1991 | A |
5024149 | Kato | Jun 1991 | A |
5123456 | Jansen | Jun 1992 | A |
5127446 | Marelin | Jul 1992 | A |
5129350 | Marelin | Jul 1992 | A |
5146847 | Lyon et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163482 | Wolcott | Nov 1992 | A |
5203786 | Vernick | Apr 1993 | A |
5251360 | Putz | Oct 1993 | A |
5291637 | Meyers | Mar 1994 | A |
5293668 | Tibiletti | Mar 1994 | A |
5303571 | Quinn et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5322091 | Marelin | Jun 1994 | A |
5452523 | Jansen | Sep 1995 | A |
5483998 | Marelin et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488760 | Jansen | Feb 1996 | A |
5533235 | Fukuda | Jul 1996 | A |
5566726 | Marelin | Oct 1996 | A |
5628348 | Scott et al. | May 1997 | A |
5644819 | Lyons | Jul 1997 | A |
5647563 | Gantner et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5732446 | Blanks | Mar 1998 | A |
5743310 | Moran | Apr 1998 | A |
5850674 | Jansen | Dec 1998 | A |
6014792 | Marelin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038967 | Chak et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041581 | Huber | Mar 2000 | A |
6122804 | Gamaggio-Schafer | Sep 2000 | A |
6302157 | Deschenes et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6457212 | Craig | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6615879 | Kurmis | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6668427 | Bulanda et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
7373695 | Caveney et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7484274 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7650680 | Stillings et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7866007 | DeBerry et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20060266230 | Vereschagin | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272133 | Ingalls et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070084022 | Stillings | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20090114308 | Marelin | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
658135 | Feb 1963 | CA |
1177515 | Nov 1984 | CA |
594821 | Jan 1978 | CH |
663995 | Jan 1988 | CH |
1268077 | Feb 1962 | DE |
19805062 | Aug 1999 | DE |
0174410 | Mar 1986 | EP |
0479602 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0479623 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0687528 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0758616 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0806349 | Nov 1997 | EP |
1231140 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1359357 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1537800 | Jun 2005 | EP |
932116 | Jul 1963 | GB |
1025811 | Apr 1966 | GB |
1030707 | May 1966 | GB |
1068993 | May 1967 | GB |
7408399 | Dec 1975 | NL |
WO 8202035 | Jun 1982 | WO |
WO 9627526 | Sep 1996 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Operators Manual Repair Parts List Automatic S350 Auto Air Tool”, Band-it, A Unit of IDEX Corporation, 1999, pp. 1-38. |
IDEX Corporation, “Automatic Air Tool S350”, p. 15, 2000, Band-It The Clamping Experts, Jul. 2000, pp. 1-4. |
“IT9000 Bench Mounted Electric Tool Specifications”, BAND-IT, The Clamping experts, date unknown, pp. 1-8. |
“Simple Solution to a Complex Problem: Electro Adapter, Inc. Introduces CBS Calibrated Banding System”, Electro Adapter, Inc. pp. 1-4. |
“Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow Sunbank Meets the Challenge”, Sunbank Electronics, Inc., pp. 1-4. |
International Search Report for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US08/82271, mailed Dec. 29, 2008. |
Written Opinion for International (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US08/82271, mailed Dec. 29, 2008. |
Hogan, “Ball-Locking System secures stainless steel tie”, Design News, Apr. 6, 1981, pp. 1-2. |
“Scru-Band Scru-Seal™ Clamps Clamp-Pak™”, BAND-IT® Catalog, pp. 18-19. |
“Multi-Lok Ties: Self-Locking Multi-Lok Ties”, p. 8. |
Strapping, Stretch Wrapping and Tape Protection Packaging Systems Catalog, Signode, May 8, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
“Steel Strapping, Seals and Tools”, Certified Slings and Supply website, as early as 2006, available at http://www.certifiedslings.com/catalog/8-SteelStrappingSealsTools.shtml, printed on Apr. 16, 2009, pp. 1-2. |
“Steel Strapping, Seals and Packaging Tools”, Modern International Corporation website, as early as May 5, 2002, available at http://www.moderninternational.com/strapping/steel.htm, printed on Jun. 28, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for (PCT) Patent Application No. PCT/US08/82271, mailed May 14, 2010. |
Official Action for New Zealand Patent Application No. 585144, dated Jul. 7, 2011 2 pages. |
Search Report for European Patent Application No. 08843376.8, mailed Nov. 24, 2011 8 pages. |
Official Action with English translation for Russia Patent Application No. 2010122309/02(031735), dated Nov. 21, 2011 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090144947 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60985142 | Nov 2007 | US |