Dual-mode camera

Abstract
A dual camera system uses a single lens and no moving parts in the optical path. A single lens directs a desired scene to a partially reflective beamsplitting mirror, thence to a pair of image sensors. For day/night operation, one sensor may be optimized for nighttime sensitivity, while the other is optimized for daytime operation. Alternatively, one optical path may have greater magnification, thus allowing electronic zooming with no resolution loss. The system may be enhanced with an image intensifier for nighttime operation; digital sensors for improved resolution, or orthogonal gyroscopic accelerometers for image stabilization. Additionally, the monochrome and color images may be produced simultaneously and ‘fused’ algorithmically, yielding an improvement in sensitivity and color resolution compared with a conventional color camera.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The subject Invention is generally related to cameras and sensors and is specifically directed to a camera design that may use multiple imagers for day/night imaging, or for variable zoom. The design overcomes deficiencies of prior-art cameras wherein moving parts were required in the optical path, or wherein electronic zooming reduced image resolution. The cameras described may be either analog or digital.


2. Discussion of the Prior Art


Video cameras have become commonplace in modern life. Improvements in process technology have resulted in cameras offering high performance at steadily decreasing prices. While early cameras universally used vacuum-tube technology, modern cameras are solid-state devices using CMOS or CCD technology.


CCD and CMOS image sensors are typically organized into a planar array of photosensitive cells in orthogonal axes. When gated ON, each cell accumulates incident photons, yielding a net electrical charge in the cell. At the end of a defined exposure time, the accumulated charges are sequentially transferred from the exposed cells via switched-capacitor techniques.


Since the individual cells are merely accumulators of photons, they offer little or no inherent discrimination between various wavelengths of light. Indeed, such sensor arrays are often used for imaging using near- or far-infrared illumination. As a result or this broad-bandwidth behavior, such cameras are useful to produce monochrome video.


The overall dynamic range of such image sensors is limited. The top end of the dynamic range is limited by the cell's maximum-voltage capacity. That is, once the cell voltage has reached some specified maximum value (typically in the range of 1 to 5 volts), the cell is unable to retain any additional photon-induced charges.


The bottom end of the cell's dynamic range, which defines its sensitivity to low lighting conditions, is limited by imperfections in the array. There are two primary mechanisms. First, cell-to-cell nonuniformities exist in cell geometry, dark current, and sensitivity. These nonuniformities result in a fixed-noise pattern superimposed on images produced by the camera, even in the presence of a uniform illuminant. Second, thermal noise directly creates dynamic cell-to-cell voltage inequalities, which appear as ‘snow’ in rendered scenes. These two sources of noise limit the ultimate sensitivity of the system at low levels of illumination, since the effective signal-to-noise ratio decreases as illumination decreases.


A further reduction in sensitivity results if the array is configured to render color images. To render color images, the front surface of the array is overlaid with a color filter array such that adjacent cells are sensitive to different colors. A variety of such color filter schemes exist, including RGB, YCrCb, and Bayer patterns. While this enhancement does provide the array with a means to render color imagery, it reduces the overall sensitivity of the array. This reduction in optical sensitivity is due both to the non-ideal transmissivity of the filter to the desired wavelength, as well as to the elimination of energy at the remaining (non-desired) visible wavelengths.


Due to the ongoing advancement of digital techniques, a trend towards image sensors of ever-increasing resolution is evident. When the primary market for cameras was in television-related fields, there was not much demand for cameras to exceed the traditional 350 TV lines/480 scan lines common to broadcast television. Since then, a variety of video applications have emerged, driven by the emerging interne, digital still photography, and HDTV technologies. As a result, higher-resolution image sensors are in demand and are increasingly available. These higher-resolution imagers aggravate the problems of low-light sensitivity due to both their smaller cell geometries, and to the (typically) shorter exposure times they employ.


Many visual surveillance applications demand superior performance under very subdued illumination, such as night imaging with moonlight or even starlight as the ambient illuminant. While some progress has been made in improving the sensitivity of monochrome CCD imagers, such as the Watec 902H, the imagers remain insufficiently sensitive for moonlight or starlight operation. Conventional CCD or CMOS imagers are unable to produce usable video under these conditions. This problem has been remedied by the use of image intensifier technologies. These devices typically use a thin wafer of microscopically perforated opaque photoelectric material, biased by a strong electric field. Photons incident on the front of the plate produce an avalanche of photoelectrons through the microscopic pore, and energize a phosphor coating on the rear of the wafer. Currently available devices may exhibit luminous gains of perhaps 0.1 Foot-Lambert per foot-candle, which is enough to allow their use under starlight-illuminated conditions. Various night vision scope, or the commercial OWL products produced by B. E. Meyer.


These image-intensifier devices have several operational limitations. First, the devices may be damaged if operated at ‘normal’ illuminations, such as daylight. Recent ‘gated’ and ‘filmed’ designs largely eliminate this problem. Also, these image-intensifier devices are not capable of rendering color scenes and are thus used in monochrome systems only.


As a result of the foregoing, separate cameras are generally required for operation under very low illuminations and for normal-to-low conditions. Prior-art systems not only use two image sensors; they use entirely separate optical paths including lenses. While this approach has utility, a significant weight and size penalty is incurred by the duplication of the lenses. This is particularly the case with night-vision cameras, which necessarily use very large lenses (160 mm and 310 mm lenses are commonplace) to increase the photon capture aperture of the system.


Another approach used in the prior art is the use of movable mirrors in the optical path. In this approach, a pair of mechanically linked mirrors is used to selectively pass the optical flux through one path, which includes an intensifier, or through a second path, which does not have in intensifier. While this approach has merit in it's elimination of a redundant lens, it is not without drawbacks. One deficiency is in the difficulty of establishing precise physical positioning of the mirrors after they have been moved. This may be a serious deficiency if the system is used with a high magnification lens with a correspondingly small field of view, or if the system is used as a weapon sight. Another deficiency of a moving-mirror system is the mere presence of moving parts, which inevitably reduces the ruggedness and reliability of the system.


A related problem entails the need for image stabilization within the camera. Hand-held cameras are subject to the unavoidable vibration and tremors of the human hand. This problem is exacerbated when long-range telephoto lenses are employed; the viewed image is increasingly unstable as the magnification is increased. A variety of image stabilization techniques have been applied commercially. Typically, an orthogonal pair of gyroscopic sensors are disposed parallel to the image plane. The respective acceleration outputs are twice-integrated, then are used to correct the image position. An electronic technique, used in the Hitachi VM-I-181 camcorder, offsets the image sensor array scanning clocks so as to compensate for instantaneous image displacement. An electromechanical approach is used in some lens adapters, manufactured by Canon. In this technique, a planar, optically transmissive object is placed in the optical path, and is mechanically articulated to displace the optical path as necessary to maintain a constant image position in the image plane. While useful, these approaches have their disadvantages. The optical method adds illumination levels. The electronic method necessarily sacrifices a bordered area at the top and sides of the image, sufficient to cover the peak angular excursions of the image. This effectively reduces the overall resolution of the rendered image.


SUMMARY THE INVENTION

The subject invention is directed to a multi-imager camera, which is operable under extremes of illuminations, without the need for multiple optical paths. A single-lens system is employed, and a partially-reflective beamsplitting mirror is disposed to direct incoming images simultaneously to two or more sensors, respectively optimized for two different conditions, such as day/night operation or variable-zoom operation. This effectively overcomes the size and weight penalty incurred in a multiple-lens solution.


Beamsplitting mirrors are well-known optical devices. Such mirrors have been employed in a variety of optical systems over the years, including color cameras. Early color cameras used two beam splitting mirrors to trisect the optical path, optical filters for the three primary colors, and three monochrome sensor tubes. Beamsplitting mirrors are also used in a variety of other optical systems, such as interferometry. As a result, such mirrors are well-known, and are commercially available in a variety of sizes and transmittance/reflectance ratios.


Since the transmittance and reflectance of such mirrors are well controlled, it is possible to optimize a single-lens, dual-path system for dynamic range. For example, the daylight/color camera is used when illuminant levels are high. It is thus possible to select a mirror that diverts a small percentage of the incident light towards the daylight color camera, while diverting a large percentage of the incident light towards the low-light monochrome camera and/or intensifier.


The addition of an image intensifier enhances the sensitivity of the device under conditions of low illumination. The intensifier is placed in the optical path at a point beyond the beamsplitting mirror, and in whichever path the mirror ‘favors’. For example, if the selected mirror is 90% transmissive and 10% reflective, then the intensifier is located behind the mirror where it can receive the preponderance of the incident optical energy. Conversely, if the mirror is 90% reflective and 10% transmissive, then the image intensifier is positioned to capture the reflected light from the mirror. In either case, the front surface of the intensifier must necessarily be located in the image plane of the lens, as extended or displaced by the beamsplitting mirror.


Image sensors and image intensifiers tend to have somewhat limited dynamic ranges. At high light levels, the devices may saturate or suffer physical damage. At very low light levels, the image produced by the device may become noisy, as previously discussed. This difficulty may be optical energy reaching the intensifier under high illumination.


In an alternative embodiment, digital image sensors are advantageously employed to increase the overall system resolution. Moreover, multiple digital sensors may share a common address and/or data bus, and may be selectively enabled. The selection may be automatic based on scene illumination, or may be manual.


In another enhancement, stabilization of the image produced by a digital sensor is effectuated by measuring and twice integrating the angular acceleration in two orthogonal axes parallel to the sensor's axes. Such instantaneous position information is then used to temporally offset the camera's scan timing signals, thus yielding a stable image. Alternatively, the instantaneous position information may generate an address offset in the read addresses used to access the imager array or its buffer, also yielding a stable image.


In yet another enhancement, the individual optical paths may use relay lenses of different magnifications. It is thus possible to selectively ‘zoom’ a desired scene by selecting one imager or the other. This allows zooming without moving parts in the optical path. It also allows the scene to be zoomed without loss of image resolution, as is the case in prior-art systems which zoomed by scanning a subset of a scanned image.


It is, therefore, an object and feature of the present invention to provide a dual day/night camera without the use of dual lenses.


It is an additional object and feature of the subject invention to provide such day/night operation through the use of a partially-reflective beamsplitting mirror.


It is another object and feature of the present invention to enhance the low-light performance of the day/night camera through the use of an image intensifier device.


It is another object and feature of the subject invention to employ digital image sensors, with the aim of providing enhanced image resolution.


It is another object and feature of the subject invention to effect digital imager selection by enabling or disabling one or more digital image sensors that share a common bus.


It is another object and feature of the subject invention to provide a means for selectively magnifying an image, without moving optical parts and without sacrifice of image resolution.


It is yet another object and feature of the subject invention to stabilize the captured images by sensing angular movements of the sensor and adjusting the scan timing or read addresses thereof. Other objects and features will be readily apparent from the accompanying drawings and detailed description of the preferred embodiment.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts prior-art day/night cameras, which use dual optical paths and sensors. electrical switch to select the desired camera output.



FIG. 2 depicts a day/night camera according to an embodiment.



FIG. 3 depicts the day/night camera of FIG. 2, with an additional controlled-iris mechanism to provide increased dynamic range.



FIG. 4 depicts the day/night camera of FIG. 2, with the addition of an image-intensifier device to extend the low-light sensitivity of the system.



FIG. 5 depicts the day/night system of FIG. 4, with the addition of controlled irises to extend the dynamic range of the system, and to protect the image intensifier mechanism.



FIG. 6 depicts a multi-imager camera using digital imagers.



FIG. 7 depicts the day/night camera of FIG. 2, using digital image sensors.



FIG. 8 depicts the digital day/night camera of FIG. 6, with the addition of an image-intensifier device and dual irises.



FIG. 9 depicts the use of the invention to selectively zoom an image



FIG. 10 is an example of a handheld embodiment of the system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to FIG. 1, a prior-art system is depicted, which uses two lenses and sensors to span the desired range of ambient illumination. Daylight operation is accomplished using daylight lens 2 and color image sensor 4. Nighttime scenes are captured by lens 6 and image sensor 8, which is a monochrome area sensor optimized for high sensitivity. Typically, the overall ambient illumination is detected by, as an example, a photodiode 3. The resulting signal is buffered by buffer 9, compared with a reference value by comparator 5, and used to drive a video source selection relay 7.


The disadvantages of such a typical system are readily apparent. The overall size, weight and cost are dramatically increased by the inclusion of the additional lens.


An enhanced system, subject of the present invention, is depicted in FIG. 2. A single lens 10 is used to direct a desired scene onto the sensor optics, consisting of beamsplitting mirror 12, sensitive monochrome sensor 16 and color sensor 14. The relative positions of the respective sensors 14 and 16 may be exchanged, if necessary, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The beamsplitting mirror 12 is partially reflective, in some proportion designed to optimize the desired optical behavior. For example, if absolute nighttime sensitivity is the highest goal of the design, then the beamsplitter may be 5 percent reflective and 95 percent transmissive, so as to maximize the amount of optical flux that reaches the nighttime sensor. The appropriate sensor output is selected by switch 18. Note that switch 18 could be automated as sensor output signal 22 is optionally displayed on viewfinder 20.


In FIG. 3, the basic system of FIG. 2 is enhanced with a driven iris, which serves to limit the amount of incident light that arrives at the monochrome sensor 16 or, indeed, at the color sensor 14. The overall output video signal 22 is sampled by diode 72, filtered by capacitor 68, given a time constant via resistor 70, and applied to iris driver 66. The iris driver, in turn, drives the iris actuator 64 and the iris 60, so as to limit the output signal 22 if it increases to some predetermined level. This serves to limit and stabilize the amount of light incident on the sensors 14 and 16.



FIG. 4 depicts the basic system of FIG. 2, as supplemented by the inclusion of an image intensifier 24. Since the image on the rear surface of the image intensifier is a simple planar image, a relay lens system 26 may be necessary to transfer the image from the rear surface of the intensifier 24 to the monochrome sensor 16. Other techniques may also be employed to transfer the image, such as the fusion of fiber optic bundles between the intensifier and imager, or direct bonding of the intensifier to the imager.



FIG. 5 depicts an enhancement to the system of FIG. 4. In FIG. 5, a second iris 80 is added, immediately in front of the monochrome sensor 16. This second iris is used to limit the amount of illumination reaching the sensitive monochrome sensor 16, preventing it from suffering from saturation when the intensifier output image is bright. The output signal from the monochrome sensor 16 is sampled by diode 90, filtered by capacitor 86, given a time constant by resistor 88, buffered by buffer 84, and drives the iris 80 via actuator 82. This effectively stabilizes and limits the output signal from the monochrome sensor 16. This approach frees the first iris 60 to control the overall output from the system, as depicted earlier in FIG. 3.



FIG. 6 depicts a multiple-imager version of the system. Multiple digital imagers 100, 102, and 104, share a common address bus 108 and data bus 106. A camera selection signal 110 is applied to multiplexer 112, which thereupon selects one of the sensors via enable lines 114, 116, and 118. This method allows the selection of a desired camera. The individual cameras 100, 102, and 104 may share a common optical path, as in previous examples which use a two-way beamsplitting mirror. The individual cameras 100, 102, and 104 may separately optimized for different purposes, such as day vs. night, 1× zoom vs. 2× zoom, etc.



FIG. 7 depicts an enhancement to the basic system of FIG. 2, wherein the analog sensors are replaced with high-resolution digital sensors 14 (color) and 16 (monochrome). As before, a image sensors 14 and 16. Images captured by these digital sensors are transferred to a suitable signal processor 30 with associated program/data memory 32. The processor 30, among other tasks, controls the scanning of the selected image sensor 14 or 16, and produces a corresponding output signal 22 in a desired signal format, such as NTSC, PAL, or a digital format such as D-1. A pair of orthogonal gyroscopic accelerometers 34 and 36 is disposed in a plane parallel to the image plane of the monochrome sensor 16. Angular accelerations detected by sensors 34 and 36 are twice-integrated by processor 30, to derive a knowledge of the instantaneous angular position of the device. This information is then used to temporally offset the image sensor scanning signals produced by the processor 30, effectively stabilizing the image position. Alternatively, the instantaneous position information previously described may be used to variably offset the read addresses driven to the imager or it's bugger, again effectively stabilizing the image. A variety of user input pushbuttons 38 are provided to allow user control of various camera parameters, for instance brightness, stabilization on/off, day/night mode, power on/off, etc.


An additional benefit of the dual-digital-sensor system of FIG. 7 is the ability to scan the imager in reverse-pixel or reverse-line order. This ability overcomes the optical problem imposed by the inclusion of the mirror; images that have been reversed vertically or horizontally by the mirror may be “re-reversed” electronically.


An additional benefit of the dual-digital-sensor system of FIG. 7 is the ability to ‘fuse’ the two images. The monochrome sensor 16 is used to provide scene luminance information, while the color sensor 14 is used to provide chrominance information. Note that, since luminance information is provided by camera 16, it is possible to use non-traditional color filters on color sensor 14 to increase its resolution and sensitivity. For example, a simple CrCb filter could be used on color sensor 14, with no pixels wasted for detecting luminance. This effectively increases the color resolution by one-third. The processor 30 may be used to scale and merge the two information streams into one signal. This method is not possible in prior-art systems, which used movable mirrors.



FIG. 8 depicts an enhancement to the digital system of FIG. 7, wherein the dual-iris arrangement of FIG. 5 is used to optimize the dynamic range of the system. As before, incident light reaching monochrome sensor 16 is controlled by iris 80, as driven by actuator 82 under processor control. This effectively prevents the sensitive monochrome imager from suffering saturation or overload. The intensifier 24 is protected by iris 60, driven by actuator 64, also under processor control. This iris serves to protect the intensifier device from excessive illumination. The dynamic range of both imagers may also be improved by the inclusion of automatic gain control, used in conjunction with the irises. without moving optical parts and without reduction of image resolution. While the example in FIG. 9 depicts a pair of digital imagers, analog imagers could be used to the same effect. A lens captures a desired scene and passes it to an optional image intensifier 24. The image thereupon passes to a beamsplitting mirror 12, thence to a pair of imagers 140 and 146 via relay lenses 142 and 144 respectively. The relay lenses are selected to have differing magnification ratios. In the example shown, relay lens 142 exhibits a magnification of 1:1, while relay lens 144 exhibits a magnification of 2:1. Imager 140 or imager 146 may be selected via CAM SELECT signal 152 and inverter 148. This effectively allows selection of a desired image, or selection of the same image with different magnification. As an example, lens 140 and imager 142 may render a scene 154, of some given angular field of view. When lens 144 and imager 146 are selected, a smaller field of view 156 is rendered, but at the same resolution as the previous, larger image.



FIG. 10 depicts a preferred embodiment a handheld version of the device. A housing 46 contains a lens 10, user controls 38, eyepiece 42, battery compartment access panel 46, and carrying strap 44.


While certain features and embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein it should be understood that the invention includes all improvements, modifications

Claims
  • 1. A camera, comprising: a single lens system adapted to direct a beam, the single lens system providing a directed beam;an iris adapted to limit an amount of the directed beam, the iris providing a limited amount of the directed beam;a mirror adapted to receive and distribute the limited amount of the directed beam, the mirror providing a first portion of the distributed beam and a second portion of the distributed beam;a first digital image sensor adapted to receive the first portion of the distributed beam;a second digital image sensor adapted to receive the second portion of the distributed beam;an image intensifier adapted to receive and intensify at least one of the following: the limited amount of the directed beam,the first portion of the distributed beam, andthe second portion of the distributed beam;a processor adapted to receive an output from at least one of the first image sensor and the second image sensor, the processor being adapted to provide an iris driver control signal to an iris driver;a multiplexer adapted to merge characteristics of output provided by the first digital image sensor and the second digital image sensor;an iris driver adapted to operate the iris, the iris driver receiving the iris driver control signal; andwhere the iris driver control signal is provided to establish the limited amount of the directed beam to prevent overexposure to at least one of the following: the image intensifier,the first digital image sensor, andthe second digital image sensor.
  • 2. A camera according to claim 1 and further comprising: the processor being operable to control a scanning of the first digital image sensor and the second digital image sensor,the processor being adapted to receive scanned output of the first digital image sensor, the processor being adapted to receive scanned output of the second digital image sensor, the processor being adapted to produce an output.
  • 3. A camera according to claim 1 and further comprising: the processor being further adapted to twice integrate the angular accelerations to derive an instantaneous angular position of the camera; andthe processor being further adapted to temporally offset the scanning, thereby stabilizing the output based on the instantaneous angular position.
  • 4. A camera according to claim 1 and further comprising: the first digital image sensor being a color image sensor providing chrominance information;the second digital image sensor being a monochrome image sensor providing luminance information; andthe processor being operable to control a scanning of the chrominance information and the luminance information;the processor being operable to scale the chrominance information and the luminance information; andthe processor being operable to merge the chrominance information and the luminance information.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 11/398,508 filed on Apr. 4, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,551,279 and entitled “Duel-Mode Camera.” The present patent application is a divisional of, and claims the benefit of, patent application Ser. No. 09/593,901 filed on Jun. 14, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,057,647 titled “Dual-Mode Camera,” the entire contents of which are enclosed by reference here-in.

US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
4163283 Darby Jul 1979 A
4179695 Levine et al. Dec 1979 A
4197526 Levine Apr 1980 A
4516125 Schwab et al. May 1985 A
4646140 Bailey et al. Feb 1987 A
4831438 Bellman, Jr. et al. May 1989 A
4845629 Murge Jul 1989 A
4857912 Everett, Jr. et al. Aug 1989 A
4891650 Sheffer Jan 1990 A
4910692 Outram Mar 1990 A
5027104 Reid Jun 1991 A
5027114 Kawashime et al. Jun 1991 A
5091780 Pomerleau Feb 1992 A
5109278 Erickson Apr 1992 A
5111291 Erickson May 1992 A
5166746 Sato et al. Nov 1992 A
5218367 Sheffer et al. Jun 1993 A
5243340 Norman et al. Sep 1993 A
5243530 Stanifer et al. Sep 1993 A
5268698 Smith, Sr. et al. Dec 1993 A
5283643 Fujimoto Feb 1994 A
5321615 Frisbie et al. Jun 1994 A
5334982 Owen Aug 1994 A
5341194 Haneda et al. Aug 1994 A
5400031 Fitts Mar 1995 A
5408330 Squicciarini et al. Apr 1995 A
5432838 Purchase et al. Jul 1995 A
5440337 Henderson et al. Aug 1995 A
5440343 Parulski Aug 1995 A
5448243 Bethke et al. Sep 1995 A
5463595 Rochall et al. Oct 1995 A
5469371 Bess Nov 1995 A
5497149 Fast Mar 1996 A
5508736 Cooper Apr 1996 A
5509009 Laycock Apr 1996 A
5530440 Denzer et al. Jun 1996 A
5553609 Chen et al. Sep 1996 A
5557254 Johnson et al. Sep 1996 A
5557278 Piccirillo et al. Sep 1996 A
5598167 Zijderhand Jan 1997 A
5612668 Scott Mar 1997 A
5627753 Brankin et al. May 1997 A
5629691 Jain May 1997 A
5636122 Shah et al. Jun 1997 A
5642285 Woo Jun 1997 A
5666157 Avid Sep 1997 A
5670961 Tomita et al. Sep 1997 A
5677979 Squicciarini Oct 1997 A
5689442 Swanson Nov 1997 A
5712679 Coles Jan 1998 A
5712899 Pace, II Jan 1998 A
5714948 Farmakis et al. Feb 1998 A
5742336 Lee Apr 1998 A
5751346 Dozier May 1998 A
5777551 Hess Jul 1998 A
5777580 Janky et al. Jul 1998 A
5793416 Rostoker et al. Aug 1998 A
5825283 Camhi Oct 1998 A
5835059 Nadel et al. Nov 1998 A
5850180 Hess Dec 1998 A
5867804 Pilley et al. Feb 1999 A
5917405 Joso Jun 1999 A
5926210 Hackett et al. Jul 1999 A
5933098 Haxton Aug 1999 A
5938706 Feldman Aug 1999 A
5974158 Auty et al. Oct 1999 A
5983161 Lemelson et al. Nov 1999 A
5995141 Hieda Nov 1999 A
5999116 Evers Dec 1999 A
6002427 Kipust Dec 1999 A
6009356 Monroe Dec 1999 A
6067571 Igarashi et al. May 2000 A
6069655 Seeley May 2000 A
6078850 Kane et al. Jun 2000 A
6084510 Lemelson et al. Jul 2000 A
6092008 Bateman Jul 2000 A
6100964 De Cremiers Aug 2000 A
6133941 Ono Oct 2000 A
6154658 Caci Nov 2000 A
6157317 Walker Dec 2000 A
6181373 Coles Jan 2001 B1
6195609 Pilley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6226031 Barraclough et al. May 2001 B1
6246320 Monroe Jun 2001 B1
6259475 Ramachandran et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275231 Obradovich Aug 2001 B1
6278965 Glass et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282488 Castor et al. Aug 2001 B1
6292098 Ebata Sep 2001 B1
6356625 Castellani et al. Mar 2002 B1
6385772 Courtney May 2002 B1
6424370 Courtney Jul 2002 B1
6462697 Klamer et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476858 Ramirez Diaz et al. Nov 2002 B1
6504479 Lemons Jan 2003 B1
6522352 Strandwitz et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525761 Sato et al. Feb 2003 B2
6549130 Joso Apr 2003 B1
6556241 Yoshimura et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570610 Kipust May 2003 B1
6628835 Brill Sep 2003 B1
6633333 Spencer Oct 2003 B1
6646676 DeGrace Nov 2003 B1
6662649 Knight et al. Dec 2003 B1
6675386 Hendricks et al. Jan 2004 B1
6698021 Amini Feb 2004 B1
6720990 Walker et al. Apr 2004 B1
7113971 Ohi et al. Sep 2006 B1
20030071899 Joso Apr 2003 A1
20050055727 Creamer et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050138083 Smith-Semedo et al. Jun 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (21)
Number Date Country
220752 May 1987 EP
232031 Aug 1987 EP
532110 Mar 1993 EP
209397 Jul 1993 EP
613109 Aug 1994 EP
613110 Aug 1994 EP
613111 Aug 1994 EP
744630 Nov 1996 EP
785536 Jul 1997 EP
6-301898 Oct 1994 JP
9-282600 Oct 1997 JP
HEI-10-66058 Mar 1998 JP
A-10-155040 Jun 1998 JP
9-251599 Apr 1999 JP
11-160424 Jun 1999 JP
WO9004242 Apr 1990 WO
WO-9005426 May 1990 WO
WO9527910 Oct 1995 WO
WO9612265 Apr 1996 WO
WO9737336 Oct 1997 WO
WO9852174 Nov 1998 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070182840 A1 Aug 2007 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09593901 Jun 2000 US
Child 11398508 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11398508 Apr 2006 US
Child 11617368 US