Patent Grant
7449092
The field of the invention relates to an exhaust gas oxygen sensor used in engines of mobile vehicles to reduce emissions during a wide range of operating conditions.
Engine exhaust systems utilize sensors to detect operating conditions and adjust engine air-fuel ratio. One type of sensor used is a switching type heated exhaust gas oxygen sensor (HEGO). The HEGO sensor provides a high gain between measured oxygen concentration and voltage output. The HEGO can provide an accurate indication of the stoichiometric point, but provides air/fuel information over an extremely limited range (other than indicating lean or rich).
Another type of sensor used is a universal exhaust gas oxygen sensor (UEGO). The UEGO sensor can operate across a wide range of air-fuel ratios, for example from 10:1 (rich) to pure air (lean). However, as a result, the voltage to oxygen concentration has a lower gain. Furthermore, the UEGO sensor may not provide an indication of stoichiometry as precise as the HEGO sensor, especially under widely varying temperature conditions.
The inventors herein have recognized that when an oxygen sensor is used in a post catalyst position, the precise indication of stoichiometry given by the HEGO sensor provides advantageous results, but the limited bandwidth degrades the capability of the control system to provide fast convergence to desired operating conditions. Likewise, using an UEGO sensor can provide advantageous information when operating away from stoichiometry, however, catalyst efficiency when operating about stoichiometry can degrade due to the imprecise measurement of the stoichiometric point.
One approach to try and correct for the UEGO sensor inaccuracies near stoichiometry is described in U.S. Publication 2001/0052473. Here, the power supply to the pump current is cut off, and a correction value is then determined. However, the inventors herein have also recognized a disadvantage with such an approach. For example, the power supply can be turned off only in limited conditions, such as deceleration fuel shut-off, and thus an accurate reading of stoichiometry is only available under select conditions. Furthermore, the select conditions typically do not include operation at stoichiometry under feedback control. As such, the measurement comes at an inappropriate time and is not available when needed most. Further, errors due to variations in temperature can change depending on engine conditions, and as such even if this correction is used, errors persist.
To overcome these disadvantages, and harness the respective advantages of the above sensors, the following approach can be utilized. Specifically, in one aspect, a sensor is used that comprises: a first reference cell having a reference voltage; a second pumping cell having a pumping current, and a circuit configured to pump current in the pumping cell in a first direction to prevent the reference voltage from increasing higher than a first voltage limit; and to pump current in the pumping cell in a second direction to prevent the reference voltage from decreasing lower than a second voltage limit. In one example, when the circuit pumps current in the pumping cell in the first direction to prevent the reference voltage from increasing higher than the first voltage limit, the circuit allows the reference voltage to decrease lower than the first voltage limit. Likewise, when the circuit pumps current in the pumping cell in the second direction to prevent the reference voltage from decreasing lower than the second voltage limit, the circuit allows the reference voltage to increase higher than the second voltage limit.
In this way, the reference voltage can be driven by chemical reactions to equilibrate and provide an accurate indication of stoichiometry, similar to a HEGO sensor. Likewise, outside of stoichiometry, the reference voltage is controlled in a one-sided fashion via positive and negative pumping current at respective voltage limits to provide an indication of air-fuel ratio over a wide range.
An advantage of such operation is the ability to provide a signal that is both accurate at stoichiometry and indicative of air-fuel ratio over a wider range. Such operation leads to more accurate feedback air-fuel ratio control at stoichiometry with high gain sensing, while still providing air-fuel feedback information outside of stoichiometry, such as for lean burn operation.
In another aspect, a method is provided for sensing an air-fuel ratio of exhaust gasses from an engine using a sensor having a pumping cell and a reference cell. The method comprises:
pumping current in the pumping cell during at least a first set of operating conditions;
reducing said pumping during at least a second set of operating conditions;
providing a signal from said sensor during at least said first and second operating conditions; and
adjusting at least one of a fuel injection amount and an air amount into the engine to maintain a desired air-fuel ratio based on said signal during at least said first and second operating conditions.
As such, the method advantageously uses a sensor that both (1) pumps current in the pumping cell during at least a first set of operating conditions (such as to provide an indication of air-fuel ratio over a wide range), and (2) reduces said pumping during at least a second set of operating conditions (such as about stoichiometry to allow chemical equilibrium to drive a reference voltage). In this way, by using a signal from the sensor in both circumstances to provide feedback air-fuel ratio control, accurate control can be obtained both about stoichiometry, and away from stoichiometry. Increased catalyst efficiency and reduced emissions can also be obtained.
The advantages described herein will be more fully understood by reading example embodiments in which the invention is used to advantage, referred to herein as the Description of Embodiment(s), in which like reference numbers indicate like features, with reference to the drawings wherein:
Direct injection spark ignited internal combustion engine 10, comprising a plurality of combustion chambers, is controlled by electronic engine controller 12 as shown in
Intake manifold 44 is shown communicating with throttle body 58 via throttle plate 62. In this particular example, throttle plate 62 is coupled to electric motor 94 so that the position of throttle plate 62 is controlled by controller 12 via electric motor 94. This configuration is commonly referred to as electronic throttle control (ETC), which is also utilized during idle speed control. In an alternative embodiment (not shown), which is well known to those skilled in the art, a bypass air passageway is arranged in parallel with throttle plate 62 to control inducted airflow during idle speed control via a throttle control valve positioned within the air passageway.
Exhaust gas oxygen sensor 76 is shown coupled to exhaust manifold 48 upstream of emission control device 70. In this particular example, sensor 76 provides signal EGO, which indicates whether exhaust air-fuel ratio is either lean of stoichiometry or rich of stoichiometry. Signal EGO is used to control engine air-fuel ratio as described in more detail below. In an alternative embodiment, sensor 76 provides signal UEGO to controller 12, which can convert signal UEGO into a relative air-fuel ratio λ (air-fuel ratio relative to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, so that a value of 1 is the stoichiometric, with a value less than one indicating rich, and a value greater than one indicating lean). Signal UEGO is used to advantage during feedback air-fuel ratio control in a manner to maintain average air-fuel ratio at a desired air-fuel ratio. Further, sensor 76 can be a sensor as described below in
Conventional distributorless ignition system 88 provides ignition spark to combustion chamber 30 via spark plug 92 in response to spark advance signal SA from controller 12.
Controller 12 causes combustion chamber 30 to operate in either a homogeneous air-fuel ratio mode or a stratified air-fuel ratio mode by controlling injection timing. In the stratified mode, controller 12 activates fuel injector 66 during the engine compression stroke so that fuel is sprayed directly into the bowl of piston 36. Stratified air-fuel ratio layers are thereby formed. The strata closest to the spark plug contain a stoichiometric mixture or a mixture slightly rich of stoichiometry, and subsequent strata contain progressively leaner mixtures. During the homogeneous mode, controller 12 activates fuel injector 66 during the intake stroke so that a substantially homogeneous air-fuel ratio mixture is formed when ignition power is supplied to spark plug 92 by ignition system 88. Controller 12 controls the amount of fuel delivered by fuel injector 66 so that the homogeneous air-fuel ratio mixture in chamber 30 can be selected to be substantially at (or near) stoichiometry, a value rich of stoichiometry, or a value lean of stoichiometry. Operation substantially at (or near) stoichiometry refers to conventional closed loop oscillatory control about stoichiometry. The stratified air-fuel ratio mixture will always be at a value lean of stoichiometry, the exact air-fuel ratio being a function of the amount of fuel delivered to combustion chamber 30. An additional split mode of operation wherein additional fuel is injected during the exhaust stroke while operating in the stratified mode is available. An additional split mode of operation wherein additional fuel is injected during the intake stroke while operating in the stratified mode is also available, where a combined homogeneous and split mode is available.
Second emission control device 72 is shown positioned downstream of device 70. Devices 70 and 72 can be various types of emission control devices. As shown in
Controller 12 is shown in
Controller 12 is shown receiving various signals from sensors coupled to engine 10, in addition to those signals previously discussed, including: measurement of inducted mass air flow (MAF) from mass air flow sensor 100 coupled to throttle body 58; engine coolant temperature (ECT) from temperature sensor 112 coupled to cooling sleeve 114; a profile ignition pickup signal (PIP) from Hall effect sensor 118 coupled to crankshaft 40 giving an indication of engine speed (RPM); throttle position TP from throttle position sensor 120; and absolute Manifold Pressure Signal MAP from sensor 122. Engine speed signal RPM is generated by controller 12 from signal PIP in a conventional manner and manifold pressure signal MAP provides an indication of engine load.
In this particular example, temperatures Tcat1 and Tcat2 of devices 70 and 72 are inferred from engine operation. In an alternate embodiment, temperature Tcat1 is provided by temperature sensor 124 and temperature Tcat2 is provided by temperature sensor 126.
Fuel system 130 is coupled to intake manifold 44 via tube 132. Fuel vapors (not shown) generated in fuel system 130 pass through tube 132 and are controlled via purge valve 134. Purge valve 134 receives control signal PRG from controller 12.
In one example, exhaust sensor 140 is a second EGO type exhaust gas oxygen sensor that produces output signal (SIGNAL1). In an alternative example, sensor 140 can be a UEGO sensor. Finally, in still another example, sensor 140 is a sensor as described below with regard to
While
Those skilled in the art will recognize, in view of this disclosure, that the methods described below can be used to advantage with either port fuel injected or directly injected engines.
Note also, that in one example, devices 70 and 72 are three-way catalysts.
Referring now to
For example, when a sensor is used in a post catalyst position, the precise indication of stoichiometry given by the HEGO sensor is useful, but the limited bandwidth limits the capability of the control system. Further, the limited range of accurate information also limits use away from stoichiometric operation (such as during feedback lean air-fuel ratio, or rich air-fuel ratio, control).
To overcome at least some of these disadvantages, in one example, a method for controlling a sensor having at least two cells to provide a HEGO-like signal at stoichiometry and a UEGO-like signal at air fuel ratios away from stoichiometry is described. For example, as described in more detail below, by turning the pumping current off at stoichiometry and providing a signal that blends the output of both the reference and pumping circuit, such a result is possible.
Referring now to
Reference cell 304 is formed via substrate 316 comprised also of a solid electrolyte material such as zirconia (ZrO2) having electrode pair 330. Air is introduced via hole (or reference cavity) 318, and an electrode pair 330 is also shown. A porous diffusion passage 314 is coupled between substrate 310 and 316, creating the hollow reference chamber (or detection cavity) 312. A reference voltage 322 is provided via the electrode pair 330. Note that a heater 340 for heating the sensor can be added, if desired.
As shown, the detection cavity is exposed to the exhaust gasses via the diffusion passage. In this system, in a first range, the a dual cell sensor measures the air-fuel ratio via the oxygen pumping current required to maintain a stoichiometric air fuel ratio in the cavity 312 inside the sensor as measured by an internal reference voltage 322. Specifically, the sensing cell reacts to the air-fuel ratio of the detection cavity and is used to control the pumping cell that will then pump oxygen in or out of the detection cavity. By controlling the pumping cell such that the reference cell maintains a constant voltage (typically 0.45) the pumping current will then correlate to the air fuel ratio of the exhaust gasses. For example, an interface circuit that measures the pumping current and creates a signal that can be measured by a powertrain control module (see
However, rather than using the pumping cell to hold reference cell to a fixed voltage under all conditions, the pumping cell is used to keep the reference cell voltage from exceeding pre-determined upper and lower limits in a one-sided control fashion. When the reference cell is within these limits, the reference voltage is used as an accurate, high gain air/fuel indication. At the limits, when the pumping is active, the pumping current is used to indicate the air fuel ratio across a significantly wider range.
Thus, rather than controlling the reference cell to a fixed voltage and relying on the measurement of the pumping current to indicate air fuel ratio under all conditions, one of the example methods described herein allows the reference cell to float within some range and uses both the reference cell voltage and pumping current (when active) to indicate the air-fuel ratio. This provides both the high accuracy and high gain of the HEGO sensor at stoichiometry and the wide range capability of the UEGO sensor into a single output signal.
One reason for this increased accuracy is that when the pumping cell is not active, i.e., the reference voltage is within selected limits, the output signal is driven my chemical equilibrium reactions, and thus has reduced sensitivity to external factors, such as exhaust temperature, etc. However, when the pumping cell is active to maintain the reference voltage at either the upper (lean) limit or the lower (rich) limit, an indication of air-fuel ratio over a wide range can be achieved.
The circuit is shown coupled to electrodes 330 and 332 and sensor 140. The output of the internal electrode of 332 is coupled to ground 434. The outer electrode of 332 is coupled to resister 414 and generates voltage output (Vp) across it. In addition, operational amplifier 410 is shown with the negative terminal coupled to the inner electrode 330. The positive terminal of amplifier 410 is coupled to ground 418 via the 0.7 volt source. The 0.7 volt source represents an example upper voltage limit, which is set as the lean limit in this example. However, various other voltage levels can also be used, including a variable voltage level changing based on operating conditions. The output of operational amplifier 410 is coupled through a diode 412 to resistor 414.
Continuing with the circuit shown in
Various other circuits can be used to perform the desired acts and operations, or add additional signal conditioning and modification.
This shows an example outline of the proposed control circuit. When the reference cell voltage is between the 0.2 volt and 0.7 volt limits, neither of the control circuits will supply pumping current (or will supply a reduced current), and the reference cell voltage (Vr) can be used as the sensor output. When the reference cell voltage reaches 0.2 volts (indicating a slightly rich mixture), the lower amplifier will be able to provide the pumping current necessary pump oxygen into the detection cavity to hold the reference cell at 0.2 volts. This is an example of one-sided control since the circuit will not prevent the voltage from increasing past 0.2 volts. The air fuel ratio measurement would then be derived from the pumping current output (Vp). Conversely when the reference voltage reaches the 0.7 volt limit, the upper amplifier will generate the required pumping current to maintain the reference voltage at 0.7 volts. However, this is also an example of one-sided control (although in the opposite direction) since the circuit will not prevent the voltage from decreasing below 0.7 volts.
As shown above, the circuit has two separate outputs, Vp and Vr. An alternate implementation would mix the two voltages to provide a single output similar to the example graphed in
It can be seen from
In this way, it is possible to control a dual cell UEGO sensor to provide a HEGO like signal at stoichiometry, while at the same time to provide a UEGO like signal at air-fuel ratios away from stoichiometry by turning the pumping current off at stoichiometry and providing a signal that blends the output of both the reference and pumping circuit.
As such, in one example, only a single signal is advantageously used to provide both high resolution and wide range air-fuel signal. Such an approach is advantageous relative to a system that, for example, uses two signals to provide such information. For example, the single signal approach requires fewer wires between the sensor and controller, as well as fewer A/D converters and less potential degradation.
The circuits described above with regard to
This block diagram of
If the reference cell output is less than 0.2, the upper portion of the control circuit will generate a positive pumping current and control the reference cell to 0.2. The saturation block 624 blocks the output of the lower portion of the circuit. Conversely when the reference cell voltage reaches 0.7 volts, the lower portion of the circuit will generate negative pumping currents to control the reference cell voltage. When the reference cell voltage is between 0.2 and 0.7, the outputs from both of the controllers will be blocked by their saturation blocks and no pumping current will flow; yet, the reference voltage will be driven by the oxygen concentration of the measurement exhaust gas.
As indicated above, two output signals can be used (Vp and Vr) to provide a high gain output signal (Vr) and a wide range output signal (Vp). However, in an alternative embodiment, these two separate outputs can be combined into a single output signal as indicated by block 632 in
Thus, while the reference cell voltage and a voltage that correlates to the pumping current could be output independently, in this example the above circuit combines them into a single output to reduce the number of inputs circuits required to read the sensor output.
Referring now to
Alternatively, when the answer to step 818 is yes, the routine continues to step 824 to select a first set of control gains for PID controllers used to feedback control both the downstream and upstream air-fuel ratio to the desired values. Alternatively, when the answer to step 820 is yes, the routine continues to step 826 to select a second set of gains for the PID controllers. In other words, a first set of control gains is used for the high gain sensor output of sensor 140 in the stoichiometric region, whereas a second set of control gains is used for the wide range signal output from sensor 140 away from stoichiometry.
Then, in step 828, the routine calculates a desired fuel injection amount based on errors between the desired air-fuel ratios and the values from sensors 76 and 140, respectively. This fuel injection calculation is determined using the selected gains for the current operating conditions in a proportional interval derivative (PID) feedback control system.
In this way, it is possible to advantageously utilize the multi-purpose signal output from sensor 140, as shown by
Note that while the above approach modifies the desired fuel injection amount to control the air fuel ratio, alternative approaches can be used. For example, when using an electronically controlled throttle plate (e.g., via an electric motor controlled by the controller) it can be desirable to modify the air flow to control air fuel ratio. In other words, rather than scheduling an air flow as a function of the driver demand (and setting fuel to achieve the desired air fuel ratio), one can schedule a fuel flow based on the driver demand (or other engine torque request) and calculate the required air to provide a desired air-fuel ratio. Further, feedback can be used to modify the desired airflow to obtain the target air fuel ratio using information from the sensor described above. Such an approach can provide accurate air-fuel ratio control with less torque disturbances. Still another alternative approach would be to modify both air and fuel based on the sensor.
Referring now to
Note that, in the event the pumping circuit degrades (but the reference cell is still operating appropriately, failed, the sensor can still provide a limited output similar to a HEGO, which can be used during default operation. If, however, the pumping call or circuit degrades, default operation is selected to be carried out with open-loop fuel control.
In this way, it is possible to determine degradation of a sensor having an output that has both a high gain near stoichiometry, and a wide range air-fuel ratio output, as well as schedule default operation.
Referring now to
Mode 10 includes lean closed loop feedback air-fuel ratio control at a desired lean air-fuel ratio value, where feedback is obtained from sensor 140 providing an indication of the degree of leanness in the exhaust gas. The control transitions from Mode 00 to Mode 10 when the sensor voltage (Vs) is greater than a lean limit value (0.7 volts in this example). Further, the control transitions from Mode 10 to Mode 00 with the pump cell current (Ip) is less than a threshold value (designated Upper Limit in this example).
Mode 01 includes rich closed loop feedback air-fuel ratio control at a desired rich air-fuel ratio value, where feedback is obtained from sensor 140 providing an indication of the degree of richness in the exhaust gas. The control transitions from Mode 00 to Mode 01 when the sensor voltage (Vs) is less than a rich limit value (0.2 volts in this example). Further, the control transitions from Mode 01 to Mode 00 with the pump cell current (Ip) is greater than a threshold value (designated Lower Limit in this example).
In this alternative method for the sensor 1140 for detecting air-fuel ratios, Mode 00 may be an open-loop, “HEGO-like” mode, using only the voltage reference cell to detect air-fuel ratios near stoichiometry, with greater sensitivity. And Mode 10 can use the sensor in a lean feedback manner (“UEGO-like”, with the pumping cell enabled, to detect air-fuel ratios away from stoichiometry.
If the air-fuel mixture becomes lean, Vs quickly exceeds 0.7 volts, the comparator labeled “Vs > Lean Limit” sends an output to the dual mode control logic. The pumping cell is then enabled, Vs is held at 0.45 volts, and the pumping cell current (Ip), as measured by the sense resistor (Rs), is passed through an amplifier(s) to the output terminal. The sensor is now in the Lean “UEGO-like” state (Mode 01).
If the air-fuel mixture then becomes rich enough, Ip will decrease to a value that causes the comparator “Ip < Upper Limit” to send an output to the dual mode control logic. Ip is disabled and the sensor is in Mode 00 again.
If the mixture continues to become richer, Vs decreases below 0.2 volts, the comparator “Vs < Rich Limit” sends an output to the dual mode control logic. Ip is enabled, Vs is held at 0.45 volts, and Ip, measured across Rs, is passed through amplifier(s) to the output terminal. The sensor is now in the Rich “UEGO-like” state (Mode 01).
If the mixture then becomes lean enough, Ip will increase to a value that causes comparator “Ip > Lower Limit” to send an output to the dual mode control logic. Ip is disabled and the sensor is in Mode 00 again.
The paragraphs above show the state transitions that can occur, as illustrated by the attached logic state diagram. The specific values for Ip Lower Limit or Ip Upper Limit can be selected as desired based on the application. The optimum values can be determined empirically.
Referring now to
Specifically, this alternative embodiment shows sensor 1140 with a pump current cell 1102 and a voltage reference cell 1104. The figure also identifies the direction of exhaust gas flow at 1106 and the porous diffusion passage(s) at 1108. Gas detection cavity 1110 and O2 reference electrode 1112 are also indicated on the sensor. Further, a ceramic heater 1114 is shown for heating the sensor 1140.
The output of the circuits is shown coupled to various amplifiers and circuitry. Specifically, the output voltage to the heater 1114 is fed to a sample and hold amplifier 1116, receiving command controls from a heater voltage supply circuit 1118 (which can be controlled via control logic to be selectively activated based on engine and exhaust gas operating conditions). In this example, control signals are generated from the control logic at 1150, which may includes the logic of
Continuing with
Another set of amplifiers, including a chopper circuit and resistors, 1132, is shown for measuring the pump current via resistor Rs at 1134. Comparators 1136, 1137, 1138, and 1139 are also shown for providing control input signal to block 1150. Also, control logic for the chopper circuit, and test logic, may be contained in block 1142. Both block 1150 and 1142 receive input from a clock generator (1144).
In general, the above circuitry can be referred to as: heater control, feedback circuitry for stable operation of the sensor, Ip driver, Icp for controlled leakage into Vs, chopper amplifier to minimize output errors and drift, and Z test to determine cell readiness for operation.
This concludes the description of the invention. The reading of it by those skilled in the art would bring to mind many alterations and modifications without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims. Further, the following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations regarded as novel and nonobvious. These claims may refer to “an” element or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof. Such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. Other combinations and subcombinations of features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or through presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such claims, whether broader, narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also are regarded as included within the subject matter of the present disclosure.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4384935 | De Jong | May 1983 | A |
| 4718999 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4915080 | Nakaniwa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5209206 | Danno et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5340462 | Suzuki | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5391284 | Hotzel | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5413683 | Murase et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5474665 | Friese et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5833836 | Takami et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5972200 | Kim | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6018945 | Nakagawa | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6482310 | Detwiler et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 20010052473 | Ohkuma | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020020393 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050133381 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
