Dual operation mode all temperature filter using superconducting resonators with superconductive/non-superconductive mixture

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6731960
  • Patent Number
    6,731,960
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 5, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 4, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A dual operation mode all temperature filter is provided. The dual operation mode filter is provided with a housing defining at least two cavities, an input port and an output port. It is also provided with a non-superconducting resonator disposed in a first one of the cavities and a superconducting resonator disposed in a second one of the cavities. The second resonator comprises a superconducting material containing 8-15% silver. The dual operation mode filter filters at a relatively high level at temperatures below a threshold temperature and at a lower, conventional level, at temperatures below the threshold.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The invention relates generally to filters, and, more particularly, to a dual operation mode all temperature filter using superconducting resonators.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Radio Frequency (RF) filters have been used with cellular base stations and other telecommunications equipment for some time. Such filters are conventionally used to filter out noise and other unwanted signals. For example, bandpass filters are conventionally used to filter out or block radio frequency signals in all but one or more predefined band(s). By way of another example, notch filters are conventionally used to block signals in a predefined radio frequency band.




The relatively recent advancements in superconducting technology have given rise to a new type of RF filter, namely, the high temperature superconducting (HTSC) filter. HTSC filters contain components which are superconductors at or above the liquid nitrogen temperature of 77K. Such filters provide greatly enhanced performance in terms of both sensitivity (the ability to select signals) and selectability (the ability to distinguish desired signals from undesirable noise and other traffic) as compared to conventional filters. However, since known high temperature superconducting (HTSC) materials are only superconductive at relatively low temperatures (e.g., approximately 90K or lower), and are relatively poor conductors at ambient temperatures, such superconducting filters require accompanying cooling systems to ensure the filters are maintained at the proper temperature during use. As a result, the reliability of traditional superconducting filters has been tied to the reliability of the power source. Specifically, if the power source (e.g., a commercial power distribution system) fails (e.g., a black out, a brown out, etc.) for any substantial length of time, the cooling system would likewise fail and, when the corresponding superconducting filters warm sufficiently to prevent superconducting, so too would the filters.




To prevent systems serviced by such filters from failing during these power outages, additional circuitry in the form of RF bypass circuitry was often needed to switch out the failed filter until a suitably cooled environment was returned. Such bypass circuitry added expense and complexity to known systems.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a filter is provided. The filter includes a housing defining at least two cavities, an input port, and an output port. It also includes a first non-superconducting resonator disposed in a first one of the cavities; and a first superconducting, resonator disposed in a second one of the cavities.




Preferably, the superconducting resonator comprises a superconducting material including 8-15% silver by weight.




In some embodiments, the filter is further provided with a second superconducting resonator disposed in a third cavity and a second non-superconducting resonator disposed in a fourth cavity. In such embodiments, the first cavity may optionally define an input cavity and the fourth cavity may optionally define an output cavity.




In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a combination comprising a dual operation mode filter and a conventional filter cascaded with the dual operation mode filter is provided. The dual operation mode filter provides a first level of filtering at temperatures below a threshold temperature and a second level of filtering at temperatures above the threshold temperature. The first level is higher than the second level.




In some embodiments, a low noise amplifier is coupled between the dual operation mode filter and the conventional filter. In other embodiments, an isolator is coupled between the dual operation mode filter and the conventional filter.




In some embodiments, the dual operation mode filter comprises a bandpass filter.




Other features and advantages are inherent in the apparatus claimed and disclosed or will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and its accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of a dual operation mode all temperature filter constructed in accordance with the teachings of the instant invention.





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional view of the filter of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a schematic illustration of a second dual operation mode all temperature filter constructed in accordance with the teachings of the invention.





FIG. 4

is a schematic illustration of a circuit employing the dual operation mode filter.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A dual operation mode all temperature filter


10


constructed in accordance with the teachings of the invention is shown in FIG.


1


. As discussed below, the filter


10


provides a first level of filtering when its temperature is maintained at a temperature below a threshold temperature, and a second level of filtering which is less than the first level when its temperature exceeds the threshold value. More specifically, when maintained in a cooled environment, the filter


10


produces the enhanced level (high rejection and low insertion loss) of filtering expected of HTSC filters, but when exposed to a non-cooled environment (e.g., due to a failure in the cooling system), the filter


10


delivers filtering at a level (high rejection with some insertion loss) expected of conventional (non-HTSC) RF filters. Thus, the disclosed filter


10


provides enhanced performance as compared to conventional filters and enhanced reliability as compared to prior art HTSC filters. Specifically, it provides enhanced filtering levels in most instances and ensures acceptable levels of filtering are maintained in adverse circumstances such as during power interruptions.




Although the disclosed filter


10


is particularly well suited for use with wireless telecommunication systems and will be discussed in that context herein, persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that the teachings of the invention are in no way limited to such an environment of use. On the contrary, filters constructed pursuant to the teachings of the invention can be employed in any application which would benefit from the high performance filtering and enhanced reliability it provides without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.




For the purpose of defining a chamber to contain, direct and filter electromagnetic signals, the filter


10


is provided with a housing


12


(see FIGS.


1


and


2


). As shown in

FIG. 1

, the housing


12


includes a pair of end walls


14


, an upper wall


16


, a lower wall


18


, and a pair of side plates (not shown) secured via conventional fasteners such as screws or the like to the end wall


14


, the upper wall


16


, and/or the lower wall


18


.




To divide the housing chamber into a plurality of resonant cavities


20


, the housing


12


is further provided with an inner partition wall


22


(see

FIGS. 1 and 2

) and a plurality of inner walls


24


. As shown in

FIG. 1

, the inner partition wall


22


and the inner walls


24


together define two parallel rows of resonant cavities


20


. To couple the rows of cavities


20


, the inner partition wall


22


defines a coupling aperture


28


.




In order to input electromagnetic signals into the housing


12


and to retrieve filtered signals from the housing


12


, an end wall


14


of the housing


12


respectively defines an input aperture


30


and an output aperture


32


. As shown in

FIG. 1

, the input and output apertures


30


,


32


are defined at an end of the housing


12


opposite the coupling aperture


28


. Thus, an electromagnetic signal delivered to the filter


10


via the input aperture


30


will travel down the first row of resonant cavities


20


, pass through the coupling aperture


28


, and return up the second row of resonant cavities


20


and out the output port


32


.




The thickness of the inner partition wall


22


is preferably selected to accommodate the requirements of the coupling mechanism employed to deliver electromagnetic signals to the filter


10


. The two resonant cavities


20


located adjacent the end wall defining the input and output apertures


30


,


32


form an input cavity


36


and an output cavity


38


which respectively receive at least a portion of a conventional input coupling mechanism and a conventional output coupling mechanism (not shown). In the disclosed embodiment, the input and output cavities


36


,


38


are separated by a thickened section


42


of the inner partition wall


22


. This thickened section


42


has approximately twice the thickness of the remainder of the inner partition wall


22


. As will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art, the precise dimensions of the thickened section


42


of the inner partition wall


22


are selected based upon the frequency and loading conditions the filter


10


is expected to accommodate.




As is conventional, the input and output coupling mechanisms are connected to respective RF transmission lines (not shown) that carry RF signals to and from the filter


10


. In general, each coupling mechanism includes an antenna (not shown) for propagating (or collecting) electromagnetic waves within the input and output cavities


36


and


38


. The antenna may include a simple conductive loop or a more complex structure that provides for mechanical adjustment of the position of a conductive element within the cavity


36


,


38


. An example of such a coupling mechanism is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,269, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.




For the purpose of tuning each cavity


20


to remove an undesirable frequency or range of frequencies from the RF signal being processed, each resonant cavity


20


is provided with a resonator


46


. (For simplicity of illustration, only two resonators


46


are shown in

FIG. 1.

) Although persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that resonators of various types can be employed in this role without departing from the scope or the spirit of the invention, in the preferred embodiment, the resonators


46


are each preferably implemented as a split-ring, toroidal resonator. The resonators


46


are each located within their respective resonant cavity


20


as shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. Each resonator is individually adjustable within its respective cavity. By selecting its orientation, the degree and type of coupling between each resonator


46


and the electromagnetic signals in its cavity can be adjusted as is known to those skilled in the art. Each resonator


46


is secured to the lower wall


18


by a dielectric mounting mechanism generally indicated at


48


in FIG.


2


. The mounting mechanism


48


is secured to the lower wall


18


via conventional fasteners (not shown) such as screws or the like that extend through apertures (not shown) defined in the wall


18


. Further details on exemplary mounting mechanisms may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,871, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. Another suitable dielectric mounting mechanism is described and shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,448, the disclosure of which is also hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.




For the purpose of individually tuning the cavities, each cavity is provided with a tuning disk


52


(FIG.


2


). The tuning disks


52


are the primary mechanism for tuning the resonant cavities


20


. As most easily seen in

FIG. 2

, each tuning disk


52


projects into its associated resonant cavity


20


near a gap


54


(best seen in

FIG. 2

) in the resonator


46


. Preferably, each tuning disk


52


is coupled to a screw assembly


56


(

FIG. 2

) that extends through an aperture


58


(

FIG. 1

) defined in the upper wall


16


. Such a mechanism for tuning split-ring resonators is well known to those skilled in the art and will not be further described herein. Further details, however, may be found in the disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,871, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.




For the purpose of facilitating transmission of electromagnetic signals between respective pairs of the resonant cavities


20


, the inner walls


32


disposed between adjacent coupled resonant cavities


20


of the RF filter


10


define coupling apertures


60


(see FIGS.


1


and


2


). The size and shape of the individual coupling apertures


60


may vary greatly, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. For instance, as shown in

FIG. 2

, the coupling apertures


60


are generally rectangular. In contrast, other adjacent resonant cavities


20


are coupled together by larger and/or differently shaped apertures (e.g., T-shaped apertures.




In order to further tune the RF filter


10


and to thereby establish a particular response curve for the device, adjustment of the coupling between adjacent resonant cavities


20


can be further effected via coupling screws (not shown) disposed in bores (also not shown) in the upper wall


28


, as is conventional, the bores are preferably positioned such that each coupling screw projects into a respective coupling aperture


60


.




The housing


12


of the RF filter


10


is preferably made of silver-coated aluminum, but may be made of a variety of materials having a low resistivity.




In accordance with an aspect of the invention, at least one, but not all, of the resonators


46


is made from a high temperature superconducting (HTSC) material which is doped with 8-15% silver. This high level of silver doping (conventional levels are on the order of 1-2%) enables the HTSC material to maintain a reasonable level of conductivity at temperatures above the superconducting threshold (i.e., to have a reasonably high Q factor at normal ambient temperatures).




At least one of the resonators


46


in the filter


10


is not made from an HTSC material. Instead, these resonators are made of a conventional conductive material such as copper. The copper resonator(s), therefore, exhibit conventional levels of conductivity at higher environmental temperatures such as room temperature.




More specifically, in a preferred embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

, a four pole filter


100


comprising four resonant cavities


20


, and four resonators


46


(see

FIG. 1

) is provided. In the disclosed embodiment, the resonators


46


in the input and output cavities


36


,


38


are implemented as copper toroids with no high temperature superconducting properties. The remaining two resonators


46


are also toroids. However, these last two resonators


46


are made out of an HTSC material doped with approximately 10% silver. As a result, when the filter


100


is cooled below a superconducting threshold temperature (typically to approximately 77K), the superconducting toroids


46


will exhibit their superconducting properties and the filter


100


will enjoy the enhanced filtering associated with HTSC filters. In the event of a failure in the cooling system (e.g., a power failure), the filter


100


will continue operating at the enhanced filtering level for some dwell time (typically on the order of several hours) until the filter


100


warms above the superconducting threshold. Once such warming has occurred, the high silver doping of the HTSC resonators


46


ensures that the HTSC resonators


46


will still conduct at conventional levels (i.e., not at superconducting levels). As a result of this property of the HTSC resonators


46


and as a result of the presence of the conventional (non-HTSC) resonators


46


, the filter


100


automatically switches to a conventional filtering mode of operation wherein the filter


100


filters signals as if it were a conventional (i.e., non-superconducting) filter. Upon returning to the super cooled state (e.g., upon resumption of power to the cooling system), the filter


100


automatically switches into its ultra-high performance mode where it performs filtering at the enhanced level typical of HTSC filters. Filters constructed in accordance with the teachings of the invention exhibit very low insertion loss. For example, the four pole filter


100


shown in

FIG. 3

exhibited an insertion loss of 2-5 dB at room temperature and an insertion loss of 0.2 dB at 77K.




As will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art, the ability of the dual operation mode filters


10


,


100


to automatically switch between operating modes renders the filter


100


operational at all temperatures, thereby removing the need for the RF bypass circuitry and/or temperature control circuitry associated with prior art HTSC filters. The elimination of this circuitry reduces the size and cost of the filter


100


. The filter


100


is, thus, less expensive, more reliable and smaller than conventional HTSC filters.




A process for manufacturing HTSC resonators


46


is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,347, which issued on Aug. 4, 1998 and which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. The '347 Patent, however, discloses the use of 2% by weight of silver powder in the HTSC material. The HTSC resonators


46


used in filters constructed in accordance with the present invention can be manufactured pursuant to the process disclosed in the '347 Patent with silver doping levels increased to 8-15% by weight. Although silver doping in the range of 8-15% is presently believed to be acceptable, at the present time doping at approximately a 10% level by weight is preferred. In addition, although the HTSC resonators described above can be made of heavily silver doped HTSC material, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other approaches can be taken without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For example, the HTSC resonators


46


can be made of stainless steel toroids coated with HTSC material which is heavily silver doped in accordance with the ranges specified above without departing from the teachings of the invention.




Persons of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that, although the preferred embodiment uses high silver doping to increase the ambient temperature conductivity of its HTSC resonators


46


, other conductive doping materials can be used in this role without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will further appreciate that although the filters disclosed herein are low order filters having six or fewer poles, filters with other numbers of poles can be constructed in accordance with the teachings of the invention. However, filters with four to six poles are presently preferred.




The filters


10


,


100


shown in

FIGS. 1 and 3

, respectively, are bandpass filters (i.e., filters designed to pass frequencies in a predetermined range and to block signals in frequencies higher and lower than that range). However, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the teachings of the invention are not limited to such filters. For example, a notch filter (i.e., a filter designed to block frequencies in a predetermined range) can be constructed pursuant to the teachings of the invention. Unlike the bandpass filters


10


,


100


described above, such notch filters employ HTSC resonators


46


whose HTSC material is not doped (in order to completely decouple at room temperature). Also like the bandpass filters


10


,


100


described above, the notch filter filters at an enhanced level typical of HTSC filters when maintained at a temperature at or below the superconducting threshold. However, when the notch filter is warmed above the threshold level, it acts as a pass through filter within the predetermined range (i.e., it stops blocking signals in the predetermined range). As a result, if the cooling system associated with the notch filter fails, the notch filter will permit signals having frequencies in the predetermined range to pass through without impediment, and, thus, will not prevent the serviced telecommunication device (e.g.; a base station) from operating. The notch filter achieves this result because, at ambient temperatures, the notch range will shift to a different range. Accordingly, at ambient temperatures a different range of frequencies will be blocked than at superconducting temperatures. The filter designer should consider this shift to ensure that desirable signals are not blocked at ambient temperatures.




An exemplary HTSC notch filter is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,843,871, which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. The notch filter described in this document is constructed like the notch filter described in the above-referenced '871 patent, but with the resonator modifications described above (and preferably limited to 6 or fewer poles). Accordingly, the interested reader is referred to the above-referenced '871 patent for a detailed discussion of the implementation details of HTSC notch filters.




In order to enhance the filtering performance of the dual operation mode filter


10


,


100


, the dual operation mode filters (bandpass or notch)


10


,


100


, may be cascaded with one or more conventional filters


50


as shown in FIG.


4


. By using cascaded filters


50


, it is possible to achieve high performance filtering typically associated with high order filters while using only low order pole filters. A detailed discussion of the virtues of cascading filters is provided in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/130,274, filed Aug. 6, 1998, which is still pending in front of the USPTO, and which is hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference.




As shown in

FIG. 4

, the conventional filter


50


is preferably connected to the dual operation mode filters


10


,


100


, via either a low noise amplifier


52


or an isolator


54


. A low noise amplifier


52


would be used in applications where it is desirable to amplify the filtered signal output by the dual operation mode filters


10


,


100


, prior to filtering by the conventional filter


50


. The isolator


54


would be used in applications where low loss transmission between the filter


10


,


100


, and


50


is desired, but where it is undesirable to permit operation of the conventional filter


50


to effect the operation of the dual operation mode filter


10


,


100


. A cascaded filter implemented with a dual operation mode, 4 pole bandpass filter


100


, an isolator


54


, and a conventional, high refection filter


50


, experienced increased insertion loss as compared to the statistics quoted above, but was tuned while achieving more than 20 dB/1 MHz rejection.




Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the RF spectrum is divided into A, B, A′ and B′ bands. The B band separates the A and A′ bands. The A′ band separates the B and B′ bands. Such persons will further appreciate that it is often desirable to broadcast in the A and A′ bands without broadcasting in the B band and/or to broadcast in the B and B′ bands without broadcasting in the A′ band. Prior art systems solved this problem by using two bandpass filters in parallel and multiplexing the outputs of the parallel filters.




By using a bandpass filter (either conventional or dual operation mode) cascaded with a notch filter (either conventional or dual operation mode), the same result can be achieved without requiring multiplexing. For example, if the bandpass filter is designed to pass signals in the A, B and A′ bands and the notch filter blocks signals in the B band, an A, A′ band filter is achieved. Alternatively, if the bandpass filter is designed to pass signals in the B, A′ and B′ bands and the notch filter is designed to block signals in the A′ band, a B, B′ band filter is achieved.




Although certain examples of the teachings of the invention have been described herein, the scope of coverage of this patent is not limited thereto. On the contrary, this patent covers all instantiations of the teachings of the invention fairly falling within the scope of the appended claims either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.



Claims
  • 1. A filter adapted to automatically switch between first and second acceptable operational modes based on a temperature of the filter, the filter comprising:a substrate; a conductive coating disposed on the substrate, the conductive coating comprising a mixture of a superconducting material and a non-superconducting material, wherein the superconducting and non-superconducting materials are in contact with the substrate and the conductive coating causes the filter to operate in the first acceptable operational mode when the temperature of the filter is below a critical temperature of the superconducting material and causes the filter to automatically operate in the second acceptable operational mode having more insertion loss than the first acceptable operational mode when the temperature of the filter is above the critical temperature of the superconducting material.
  • 2. The filter of claim 1, wherein the superconducting material comprises a high-temperature superconducting material.
  • 3. The filter of claim 1, wherein the non-superconducting material comprises a metallic material.
  • 4. The filter of claim 3, wherein the non-superconducting material comprises silver.
  • 5. The filter of claim 1, wherein the conductive coating comprises the superconducting material doped with the non-superconducting material.
  • 6. The filter of claim 1, wherein the conductive coating comprises a thick film of high-temperature superconducting material mixed with silver.
  • 7. An electromagnetic resonator comprising:a substrate; and a conductive coating disposed on the substrate, the conductive coating comprising a mixture of a superconducting material and a non-superconducting material, wherein the conductive coating causes the electromagnetic resonator to exhibit a first acceptable conductive property when the conductive coating is maintained at a temperature that is below a critical temperature of the superconducting material and wherein the conductive coating causes the electromagnetic resonator to exhibit a second acceptable conductive property lower than the first acceptable conductive property when the conductive coating is maintained at a temperature that is above the critical temperature of the superconducting material.
  • 8. The electromagnetic resonator of claim 7, wherein the superconducting material comprises a high-temperature superconducting material.
  • 9. The electromagnetic resonator of claim 7, wherein the conductive coating comprises the superconducting material doped with the non-superconducting material.
  • 10. The electromagnetic resonator of claim 7, wherein the conductive coating comprises a thick film of high-temperature superconducting material mixed with silver.
  • 11. The electromagnetic resonator of claim 7, wherein the non-superconducting material comprises a metallic material.
  • 12. The electromagnetic resonator of claim 11, wherein the non-superconducting material comprises silver.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/158,631, filed Sep. 22, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,309.

US Referenced Citations (35)
Number Name Date Kind
3737799 Stander Jun 1973 A
3911366 Baghdady Oct 1975 A
3988679 Clarke et al. Oct 1976 A
4476575 Franke et al. Oct 1984 A
4609892 Higgins, Jr. Sep 1986 A
4668920 Jones May 1987 A
4679248 McKeown Jul 1987 A
4733403 Simone Mar 1988 A
4742561 Tipton May 1988 A
4903257 Takeda et al. Feb 1990 A
4907291 Yamamoto Mar 1990 A
4922509 Tresset et al. May 1990 A
4972455 Phillips et al. Nov 1990 A
5020148 Bonato May 1991 A
5083236 Chason et al. Jan 1992 A
5157364 Pond et al. Oct 1992 A
5222144 Whikehart Jun 1993 A
5244869 Billing Sep 1993 A
5324713 Shen Jun 1994 A
5339459 Schiltz et al. Aug 1994 A
5355524 Higgins, Jr. Oct 1994 A
5357544 Horner et al. Oct 1994 A
5412339 Takano May 1995 A
5490173 Whikehart et al. Feb 1996 A
5493581 Young et al. Feb 1996 A
5537680 Bruno Jul 1996 A
5616540 Lithgow et al. Apr 1997 A
5629266 Lithgow et al. May 1997 A
5640698 Shen et al. Jun 1997 A
5697087 Miya et al. Dec 1997 A
5789347 Button et al. Aug 1998 A
5804534 Zaki Sep 1998 A
6041245 Mansour Mar 2000 A
6187717 Wikborg et al. Feb 2001 B1
6314309 Abdelmonem Nov 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2235828 Mar 1991 GB
17701 Jan 1990 JP
224110 Aug 1998 JP
10224110 Aug 1998 JP
10224269 Aug 1998 JP
WO 9642118 Dec 1996 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Horowitz, et al., The Art of Electronics, Cambridge University Press, 2d ed., pp. 35-42, 263-272 (1989).
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/158631 Sep 1998 US
Child 09/874725 US