Dual pump VFD controlled motor electric fracturing system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11939852
  • Patent Number
    11,939,852
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 19, 2022
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 26, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
The present invention provides a method and system for providing on-site electrical power to a fracturing operation, and an electrically powered fracturing system. Natural gas can be used to drive a turbine generator in the production of electrical power. A scalable, electrically powered fracturing fleet is provided to pump fluids for the fracturing operation, obviating the need for a constant supply of diesel fuel to the site and reducing the site footprint and infrastructure required for the fracturing operation, when compared with conventional systems.
Description
BACKGROUND
1. Field of Invention

This invention relates generally to hydraulic stimulation of underground hydrocarbon-bearing formations, and more particularly, to the generation and use of electrical power to deliver fracturing fluid to a wellbore.


2. Description of the Related Art

Over the life cycle of a typical hydrocarbon-producing wellbore, various fluids (along with additives, proppants, gels, cement, etc. . . . ) can be delivered to the wellbore under pressure and injected into the wellbore. Surface pumping systems must be able to accommodate these various fluids. Such pumping systems are typically mobilized on skids or tractor-trailers and powered using diesel motors.


Technological advances have greatly improved the ability to identify and recover unconventional oil and gas resources. Notably, horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracturing have led to the emergence of new opportunities for natural gas production from shale formations. For example, more than twenty fractured intervals have been reported in a single horizontal wellbore in a tight natural gas formation. However, significant fracturing operations are required to recover these resources.


Currently contemplated natural gas recovery opportunities require considerable operational infrastructure, including large investments in fracturing equipment and related personnel. Notably, standard fluid pumps require large volumes of diesel fuel and extensive equipment maintenance programs. Typically, each fluid pump is housed on a dedicated truck and trailer configuration. With average fracturing operations requiring as many as fifty fluid pumps, the on-site area, or “footprint”, required to accommodate these fracturing operations is massive. As a result, the operational infrastructure required to support these fracturing operations is extensive. Greater operational efficiencies in the recovery of natural gas would be desirable.


When planning large fracturing operations, one major logistical concern is the availability of diesel fuel. The excessive volumes of diesel fuel required necessitates constant transportation of diesel tankers to the site, and results in significant carbon dioxide emissions. Others have attempted to decrease fuel consumption and emissions by running large pump engines on “Bi-Fuel”, blending natural gas and diesel fuel together, but with limited success. Further, attempts to decrease the number of personnel on-site by implementing remote monitoring and operational control have not been successful, as personnel are still required on-site to transport the equipment and fuel to and from the location.


SUMMARY

Various illustrative embodiments of a system and method for hydraulic stimulation of underground hydrocarbon-bearing formations are provided herein. In accordance with an aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method of delivering fracturing fluid to a wellbore is provided. The method can comprise the steps of: providing a dedicated source of electric power at a site containing a wellbore to be fractured; providing one or more electric fracturing modules at the site, each electric fracturing module comprising an electric motor and a coupled fluid pump, each electric motor operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power; providing a wellbore treatment fluid for pressurized delivery to a wellbore, wherein the wellbore treatment fluid can be continuous with the fluid pump and with the wellbore; and operating the fracturing unit using electric power from the dedicated source to pump the treatment fluid to the wellbore.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the dedicated source of electrical power is a turbine generator. A source of natural gas can be provided, whereby the natural gas drives the turbine generator in the production of electrical power. For example, natural gas can be provided by pipeline, or natural gas produced on-site. Liquid fuels such as condensate can also be provided to drive the turbine generator.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric motor can be an AC permanent magnet motor and/or a variable speed motor. The electric motor can be capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 rpms and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque. The pump can be a triplex or quintiplex plunger style fluid pump.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the method can further comprise the steps of: providing an electric blender module continuous and/or operatively associated with the fluid pump, the blender module comprising: a fluid source, a fluid additive source, and a centrifugal blender tub, and supplying electric power from the dedicated source to the blender module to effect blending of the fluid with fluid additives to generate the treatment fluid.


In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a system for use in delivering pressurized fluid to a wellbore is provided. The system can comprise: a well site comprising a wellbore and a dedicated source of electricity; an electrically powered fracturing module operatively associated with the dedicated source of electricity, the electrically powered fracturing module comprising an electric motor and a fluid pump coupled to the electric motor; a source of treatment fluid, wherein the treatment fluid can be continuous with the fluid pump and with the wellbore; and a control system for regulating the fracturing module in delivery of treatment fluid from the treatment fluid source to the wellbore.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the source of treatment fluid can comprise an electrically powered blender module operatively associated with the dedicated source of electricity. The system can further comprise a fracturing trailer at the well site for housing one or more fracturing modules. Each fracturing module can be adapted for removable mounting on the trailer. The system can further comprise a replacement pumping module comprising a pump and an electric motor, the replacement pumping module adapted for removable mounting on the trailer. In certain illustrative embodiments, the replacement pumping module can be a nitrogen pumping module, or a carbon dioxide pumping module. The replacement pumping module can be, for example, a high torque, low rate motor or a low torque, high rate motor.


In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a fracturing module for use in delivering pressurized fluid to a wellbore is provided. The fracturing module can comprise: an AC permanent magnet motor capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 rpms and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque; and a plunger-style fluid pump coupled to the motor.


In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method of blending a fracturing fluid for delivery to a wellbore to be fractured is provided. A dedicated source of electric power can be provided at a site containing a wellbore to be fractured. At least one electric blender module can be provided at the site. The electric blender module can include a fluid source, a fluid additive source, and a blender tub. Electric power can be supplied from the dedicated source to the electric blender module to effect blending of a fluid from the fluid source with a fluid additive from the fluid additive source to generate the fracturing fluid. The dedicated source of electrical power can be a turbine generator. A source of natural gas can be provided, wherein the natural gas is used to drive the turbine generator in the production of electrical power. The fluid from the fluid source can be blended with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source in the blender tub. The electric blender module can also include at least one electric motor that is operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power and that effects blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric blender module can include a first electric motor and a second electric motor, each of which is operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power. The first electric motor can effect delivery of the fluid from the fluid source to the blending tub. The second electric motor can effect blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source in the blending tub. In certain illustrative embodiments, an optional third electric motor may also be present, that can also be operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power. The third electric motor can effect delivery of the fluid additive from the fluid additive source to the blending tub.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric blender module can include a first blender unit and a second blender unit, each disposed adjacent to the other on the blender module and each capable of independent operation, or collectively capable of cooperative operation, as desired. The first blender unit and the second blender unit can each include a fluid source, a fluid additive source, and a blender tub. The first blender unit and the second blender unit can each have at least one electric motor that is operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power and that effects blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source. Alternatively, the first blender unit and the second blender unit can each have a first electric motor and a second electric motor, both operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power, wherein the first electric motor effects delivery of the fluid from the fluid source to the blending tub and the second electric motor effects blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source in the blending tub. In certain illustrative embodiments, the first blender unit and the second blender unit can each also have a third electric motor operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power, wherein the third electric motor effects delivery of the fluid additive from the fluid additive source to the blending tub.


In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, an electric blender module for use in delivering a blended fracturing fluid to a wellbore is provided. The electric blender module can include a first electrically driven blender unit and a first inlet manifold coupled to the first electrically driven blender unit and capable of delivering an unblended fracturing fluid thereto. A first outlet manifold can be coupled to the first electrically driven blender unit and can be capable of delivering the blended fracturing fluid away therefrom. A second electrically driven blender unit can be provided. A second inlet manifold can be coupled to the second electrically driven blender unit and capable of delivering the unblended fracturing fluid thereto. A second outlet manifold can be coupled to the second electrically driven blender unit and can be capable of delivering the blended fracturing fluid away therefrom. An inlet crossing line can be coupled to both the first inlet manifold and the second inlet manifold and can be capable of delivering the unblended fracturing fluid therebetween. An outlet crossing line can be coupled to both the first outlet manifold and the second outlet manifold and can be capable of delivering the blended fracturing fluid therebetween. A skid can be provided for housing the first electrically driven blender unit, the first inlet manifold, the second electrically driven blender unit, and the second inlet manifold.


Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A better understanding of the presently disclosed subject matter can be obtained when the following detailed description is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view of a traditional fracturing site;



FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of a fracturing site in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;



FIG. 3 is a schematic perspective view of a fracturing trailer in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;



FIG. 4A is a schematic perspective view of a fracturing module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;



FIG. 4B is a schematic perspective view of a fracturing module with maintenance personnel in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;



FIG. 5A is a schematic side view of a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;



FIG. 5B is an end view of the blender module shown in FIG. 4A;



FIG. 5C is a schematic top view of a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein;



FIG. 5D is a schematic side view of the blender module shown in FIG. 5C;



FIG. 5E is a schematic perspective view of the blender module shown in FIG. 5C;



FIG. 6 is a schematic top view of an inlet manifold for a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein; and



FIG. 7 is a schematic top view of an outlet manifold for a blender module in accordance with certain illustrative embodiments described herein.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The presently disclosed subject matter generally relates to an electrically powered fracturing system and a system and method for providing on-site electrical power and delivering fracturing fluid to a wellbore at a fracturing operation.


In a conventional fracturing operation, a “slurry” of fluids and additives is injected into a hydrocarbon bearing rock formation at a wellbore to propagate fracturing. Low pressure fluids are mixed with chemicals, sand, and, if necessary, acid, and then transferred at medium pressure and high rate to vertical and/or deviated portions of the wellbore via multiple high pressure, plunger style pumps driven by diesel fueled prime movers. The majority of the fluids injected will be flowed back through the wellbore and recovered, while the sand will remain in the newly created fracture, thus “propping” it open and providing a permeable membrane for hydrocarbon fluids and gases to flow through so they may be recovered.


According to the illustrative embodiments described herein, natural gas (either supplied to the site or produced on-site) can be used to drive a dedicated source of electrical power, such as a turbine generator, for hydrocarbon-producing wellbore completions. A scalable, electrically powered fracturing fleet is provided to deliver pressurized treatment fluid, such as fracturing fluid, to a wellbore in a fracturing operation, obviating the need for a constant supply of diesel fuel to the site and reducing the site footprint and infrastructure required for the fracturing operation, when compared with conventional operations. The treatment fluid provided for pressurized delivery to the wellbore can be continuous with the wellbore and with one or more components of the fracturing fleet, in certain illustrative embodiments. In these embodiments, continuous generally means that downhole hydrodynamics are dependent upon constant flow (rate and pressure) of the delivered fluids, and that there should not be any interruption in fluid flow during delivery to the wellbore if the fracture is to propagate as desired. However, it should not be interpreted to mean that operations of the fracturing fleet cannot generally be stopped and started, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.


With reference to FIG. 1, a site plan for a traditional fracturing operation on an onshore site is shown. Multiple trailers 5 are provided, each having at least one diesel tank mounted or otherwise disposed thereon. Each trailer 5 is attached to a truck 6 to permit refueling of the diesel tanks as required. Trucks 6 and trailers 5 are located within region A on the fracturing site. Each truck 6 requires a dedicated operator. One or more prime movers are fueled by the diesel and are used to power the fracturing operation. One or more separate chemical handling skids 7 are provided for housing of blending tanks and related equipment.


With reference to FIG. 2, an illustrative embodiment of a site plan for an electrically powered fracturing operation on a onshore site is shown. The fracturing operation includes one or more trailers 10, each housing one or more fracturing modules 20 (see FIG. 3). Trailers 10 are located in region B on the fracturing site. One or more natural gas-powered turbine generators 30 are located in region C on the site, which is located a remote distance D from region B where the trailers 10 and fracturing modules 20 are located, for safety reasons. Turbine generators 30 replace the diesel prime movers utilized in the site plan of FIG. 1. Turbine generators 30 provide a dedicated source of electric power on-site. There is preferably a physical separation between the natural gas-based power generation in region C and the fracturing operation and wellbore located in region B. The natural gas-based power generation can require greater safety precautions than the fracturing operation and wellhead. Accordingly, security measures can be taken in region C to limit access to this more hazardous location, while maintaining separate safety standards in region B where the majority of site personnel are typically located. Further, the natural gas powered supply of electricity can be monitored and regulated remotely such that, if desired, no personnel are required to be within region C during operation.


Notably, the setup of FIG. 2 requires significantly less infrastructure than the setup shown in FIG. 1, while providing comparable pumping capacity. Fewer trailers 10 are present in region B of FIG. 2 than the trucks 6 and trailers 5 in region A of FIG. 1, due to the lack of need for a constant diesel fuel supply. Further, each trailer 10 in FIG. 2 does not need a dedicated truck 6 and operator as in FIG. 1. Fewer chemical handling skids 7 are required in region B of FIG. 2 than in region A of FIG. 1, as the skids 7 in FIG. 2 can be electrically powered. Also, by removing diesel prime movers, all associated machinery necessary for power transfer can be eliminated, such as the transmission, torque converter, clutch, drive shaft, hydraulic system, etc. . . . , and the need for cooling systems, including circulating pumps and fluids, is significantly reduced. In an illustrative embodiment, the physical footprint of the on-site area in region B of FIG. 2 is about 80% less than the footprint for the conventional system in region A of FIG. 1.


With reference to the illustrative embodiments of FIG. 3, trailer 10 for housing one or more fracturing modules 20 is shown. Trailer 10 can also be a skid, in certain illustrative embodiments. Each fracturing module 20 can include an electric motor 21 and a fluid pump 22 coupled thereto. During fracturing, fracturing module 20 is operatively associated with turbine generator 30 to receive electric power therefrom. In certain illustrative embodiments, a plurality of electric motors 21 and pumps 22 can be transported on a single trailer 10. In the illustrative embodiments of FIG. 3, four electric motors 21 and pumps 22 are transported on a single trailer 10. Each electric motor 21 is paired to a pump 22 as a single fracturing module 20. Each fracturing module 20 can be removably mounted to trailer 10 to facilitate ease of replacement as necessary. Fracturing modules 20 utilize electric power from turbine generator 30 to pump the fracturing fluid directly to the wellbore.


Electrical Power Generation


The use of a turbine to directly drive a pump has been previously explored. In such systems, a transmission is used to regulate turbine power to the pump to allow for speed and torque control. In the present operation, natural gas is instead used to drive a dedicated power source in the production of electricity. In illustrative embodiments, the dedicated power source is an on-site turbine generator. The need for a transmission is eliminated, and generated electricity can be used to power the fracturing modules, blenders, and other on-site operations as necessary.


Grid power may be accessible on-site in certain fracturing operations, but the use of a dedicated power source is preferred. During startup of a fracturing operation, massive amounts of power are required such that the use of grid power would be impractical. Natural gas powered generators are more suitable for this application based on the likely availability of natural gas on-site and the capacity of natural gas generators for producing large amounts of power. Notably, the potential for very large instantaneous adjustments in power drawn from the grid during a fracturing operation could jeopardize the stability and reliability of the grid power system. Accordingly, a site-generated and dedicated source of electricity provides a more feasible solution in powering an electric fracturing system. In addition, a dedicated on-site operation can be used to provide power to operate other local equipment, including coiled tubing systems, service rigs, etc. . . . .


In an illustrative embodiment, a single natural gas powered turbine generator 30, as housed in a restricted area C of FIG. 2, can generate sufficient power (for example 31 MW at 13,800 volts AC power) to supply several electric motors 21 and pumps 22, avoiding the current need to deliver and operate each fluid pump from a separate diesel-powered truck. A turbine suitable for this purpose is a TM2500+ turbine generator sold by General Electric. Other generation packages could be supplied by Pratt & Whitney or Kawasaki for example. Multiple options are available for turbine power generation, depending on the amount of electricity required. In an illustrative embodiment, liquid fuels such as condensate can also be provided to drive turbine generator 30 instead of, or in addition to, natural gas. Condensate is less expensive than diesel fuels, thus reducing operational costs.


Fracturing Module


With reference to FIGS. 4A and 4B, an illustrative embodiment of fracturing module 20 is provided. Fracturing module 20 can include an electric motor 21 coupled to one or more electric pumps 22, in certain illustrative embodiments. A suitable pump is a quintiplex or triplex plunger style pump, for example, the SWGS-2500 Well Service Pump sold by Gardner Denver, Inc.


Electric motor 21 is operatively associated with turbine generator 30, in certain embodiments. Typically, each fracturing module 20 will be associated with a drive housing for controlling electric motor 21 and pumps 22, as well as an electrical transformer and drive unit 62 (see FIG. 3) to step down the voltage of the power from turbine generator 30 to a voltage appropriate for electric motor 21. The electrical transformer and drive unit 62 can be provided as an independent unit for association with fracturing module 20, or can be permanently fixed to the trailer 10, in various embodiments. If permanently fixed, then transformer and drive unit 62 can be scalable to allow addition or subtraction of pumps 22 or other components to accommodate any operational requirements.


Each pump 22 and electric motor 21 are modular in nature so as to simplify removal and replacement from fracturing module 20 for maintenance purposes. Removal of a single fracturing module 20 from trailer 10 is also simplified. For example, any fracturing module 20 can be unplugged and unpinned from trailer 10 and removed, and another fracturing module 20 can be installed in its place in a matter of minutes.


In the illustrative embodiment of FIG. 3, trailer 10 can house four fracturing modules 20, along with a transformer and drive unit 62. In this particular configuration, each single trailer 10 provides more pumping capacity than four of the traditional diesel powered fracturing trailers 5 of FIG. 1, as parasitic losses are minimal in the electric fracturing system compared to the parasitic losses typical of diesel fueled systems. For example, a conventional diesel powered fluid pump is rated for 2250 hp. However, due to parasitic losses in the transmission, torque converter and cooling systems, diesel fueled systems typically only provide 1800 hp to the pumps. In contrast, the present system can deliver a true 2500 hp directly to each pump 22 because pump 22 is directly coupled to electric motor 21. Further, the nominal weight of a conventional fluid pump is up to 120,000 lbs. In the present operation, each fracturing module 20 weighs approximately 28,000 lbs., thus allowing for placement of four pumps 22 in the same physical dimension (size and weight) as the spacing needed for a single pump in conventional diesel systems, as well as allowing for up to 10,000 hp total to the pumps. In other embodiments, more or fewer fracturing modules 20 may be located on trailer 10 as desired or required for operational purposes.


In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can include a electric motor 21 that is an AC permanent magnet motor capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 rpms and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque. Fracturing module 20 can also include a pump 22 that is a plunger-style fluid pump coupled to electric motor 21. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have dimensions of approximately 136″ width×108″ length×100″ height. These dimensions would allow fracturing module 20 to be easily portable and fit with a ISO intermodal container for shipping purposes without the need for disassembly. Standard sized ISO container lengths are typically 20′, 40′ or 53′. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have dimensions of no greater than 136″ width×108″ length×100″ height. These dimensions for fracturing module 20 would also allow crew members to easily fit within the confines of fracturing module 20 to make repairs, as illustrated in FIG. 4b. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have a width of no greater than 102″ to fall within shipping configurations and road restrictions. In a specific embodiment, fracturing module 20 is capable of operating at 2500 hp while still having the above specified dimensions and meeting the above mentioned specifications for rpms and ft/lbs of torque.


Electric Motor


With reference to the illustrative embodiments of FIGS. 2 and 3, a medium low voltage AC permanent magnet electric motor 21 receives electric power from turbine generator 30, and is coupled directly to pump 22. In order to ensure suitability for use in fracturing, electric motor 21 should be capable of operation up to 1,500 rpm with a torque of up to 20,000 ft/lbs, in certain illustrative embodiments. A motor suitable for this purpose is sold under the trademark TeraTorq® and is available from Comprehensive Power, Inc. of Marlborough, Massachusetts A compact motor of sufficient torque will allow the number of fracturing modules 20 placed on each trailer 10 to be maximized.


Blender


For greater efficiency, conventional diesel powered blenders and chemical addition units can be replaced with electrically powered blender units. In certain illustrative embodiments as described herein, the electrically powered blender units can be modular in nature for housing on trailer 10 in place of fracturing module 20, or housed independently for association with each trailer 10. An electric blending operation permits greater accuracy and control of fracturing fluid additives. Further, the centrifugal blender tubs typically used with blending trailers to blend fluids with proppant, sand, chemicals, acid, etc. . . . prior to delivery to the wellbore are a common source of maintenance costs in traditional fracturing operations.


With reference to FIGS. 5A-5E and FIGS. 6-7, illustrative embodiments of a blender module 40 and components thereof are provided. Blender module 40 can be operatively associated with turbine generator 30 and capable of providing fractioning fluid to pump 22 for delivery to the wellbore. In certain embodiments, blender module 40 can include at least one fluid additive source 44, at least one fluid source 48, and at least one centrifugal blender tub 46. Electric power can be supplied from turbine generator 30 to blender module 40 to effect blending of a fluid from fluid source 48 with a fluid additive from fluid additive source 44 to generate the fracturing fluid. In certain embodiments, the fluid from fluid source 48 can be, for example, water, oils or methanol blends, and the fluid additive from fluid additive source 44 can be, for example, friction reducers, gellents, gellent breakers or biocides.


In certain illustrative embodiments, blender module 40 can have a dual configuration, with a first blender unit 47a and a second blender unit 47b positioned adjacent to each other. This dual configuration is designed to provide redundancy and to facilitate access for maintenance and replacement of components as needed. In certain embodiments, each blender unit 47a and 47b can have its own electrically-powered suction and tub motors disposed thereon, and optionally, other electrically-powered motors can be utilized for chemical additional and/or other ancillary operational functions, as discussed further herein.


For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, first blender unit 47a can have a plurality of electric motors including a first electric motor 43a and a second electric motor 41a that are used to drive various components of blender module 40. Electric motors 41a and 43a can be powered by turbine generator 30. Fluid can be pumped into blender module 40 through an inlet manifold 48a by first electric motor 43a and added to tub 46a. Thus, first electric motor 43a acts as a suction motor. Second electric motor 41a can drive the centrifugal blending process in tub 46a. Second electric motor 41a can also drive the delivery of blended fluid out of blender module 40 and to the wellbore via an outlet manifold 49a. Thus, second electric motor 41a acts as a tub motor and a discharge motor. In certain illustrative embodiments, a third electric motor 42a can also be provided. Third electric motor 42a can also be powered by turbine generator 30, and can power delivery of fluid additives to blender 46a. For example, proppant from a hopper 44a can be delivered to a blender tub 46a, for example, a centrifugal blender tub, by an auger 45a, which is powered by third electric motor 42a.


Similarly, in certain illustrative embodiments, second blender unit 47b can have a plurality of electric motors including a first electric motor 43b and a second electric motor 41b that are used to drive various components of blender module 40. Electric motors 41b and 43b can be powered by turbine generator 30. Fluid can be pumped into blender module 40 through an inlet manifold 48b by first electric motor 43b and added to tub 46b. Thus, second electric motor 43a acts as a suction motor. Second electric motor 41b can drive the centrifugal blending process in tub 46b. Second electric motor 41b can also drive the delivery of blended fluid out of blender module 40 and to the wellbore via an outlet manifold 49b. Thus, second electric motor 41b acts as a tub motor and a discharge motor. In certain illustrative embodiments, a third electric motor 42b can also be provided. Third electric motor 42b can also be powered by turbine generator 30, and can power delivery of fluid additives to blender 46b. For example, proppant from a hopper 44b can be delivered to a blender tub 46b, for example, a centrifugal blender tub, by an auger 45b, which is powered by third electric motor 42b.


Blender module 40 can also include a control cabin 53 for housing equipment controls for first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b, and can further include appropriate drives and coolers as required.


Conventional blenders powered by a diesel hydraulic system are typically housed on a forty-five foot tractor trailer and are capable of approximately 100 bbl/min. In contrast, the dual configuration of blender module 40 having first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b can provide a total output capability of 240 bbl/min in the same physical footprint as a conventional blender, without the need for a separate backup unit in case of failure.


Redundant system blenders have been tried in the past with limited success, mostly due to problems with balancing weights of the trailers while still delivering the appropriate amount of power. Typically, two separate engines, each approximately 650 hp, have been mounted side by side on the nose of the trailer. In order to run all of the necessary systems, each engine must drive a mixing tub via a transmission, drop box and extended drive shaft. A large hydraulic system is also fitted to each engine to run all auxiliary systems such as chemical additions and suction pumps. Parasitic power losses are very large and the hosing and wiring is complex.


In contrast, the electric powered blender module 40 described in certain illustrative embodiments herein can relieve the parasitic power losses of conventional systems by direct driving each piece of critical equipment with a dedicated electric motor. Further, the electric powered blender module 40 described in certain illustrative embodiments herein allows for plumbing routes that are unavailable in conventional applications. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the fluid source can be an inlet manifold 48 that can have one or more inlet crossing lines 50 (see FIG. 7) that connect the section of inlet manifold 48 dedicated to delivering fluid to first blender unit 47a with the section of inlet manifold 48 dedicated to delivering fluid to second blender unit 47b. Similarly, in certain illustrative embodiments, outlet manifold 49 can have one or more outlet crossing lines 51 (see FIG. 6) that connect the section of outlet manifold 49 dedicated to delivering fluid from first blender unit 47a with the section of outlet manifold 49 dedicated to delivering fluid from second blender unit 47b. Crossing lines 50 and 51 allow flow to be routed or diverted between first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b. Thus, blender module 40 can mix from either side, or both sides, and/or discharge to either side, or both sides, if necessary. As a result, the attainable rates for the electric powered blender module 40 are much larger that of a conventional blender. In certain illustrative embodiments, each side (i.e., first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b) of blender module 40 is capable of approximately 120 bbl/min. Also, each side (i.e., first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b) can move approximately 15 t/min of sand, at least in part because the length of auger 45 is shorter (approximately 6′) as compared to conventional units (approximately 12′).


In certain illustrative embodiments, blender module 40 can be scaled down or “downsized” to a single, compact module comparable in size and dimensions to fracturing module 20 described herein. For smaller fracturing or treatment jobs requiring fewer than four fracturing modules 20, a downsized blender module 40 can replace one of the fracturing modules 20 on trailer 10, thus reducing operational costs and improving transportability of the system.


Control System


A control system can be provided for regulating various equipment and systems within the electric powered fractioning operation. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the control system can regulate fracturing module 20 in delivery of treatment fluid from blender module 40 to pumps 22 for delivery to the wellbore. Controls for the electric-powered operation described herein are a significant improvement over that of conventional diesel powered systems. Because electric motors are controlled by variable frequency drives 63, absolute control of all equipment on location can be maintained from one central point. When the system operator sets a maximum pressure for the treatment, the control software and variable frequency drives 63 calculate a maximum current available to the motors. Variable frequency drives 63 essentially “tell” the motors what they are allowed to do.


Electric motors controlled via variable frequency drive 63 are far safer and easier to control than conventional diesel powered equipment. For example, conventional fleets with diesel powered pumps utilize an electronically controlled transmission and engine on the unit. There can be up to fourteen different parameters that need to be monitored and controlled for proper operation. These signals are typically sent via hardwired cable to an operator console controlled by the pump driver. The signals are converted from digital to analog so the inputs can be made via switches and control knobs. The inputs are then converted from analog back to digital and sent back to the unit. The control module on the unit then tells the engine or transmission to perform the required task and the signal is converted to a mechanical operation. This process takes time.


Suitable controls and computer monitoring for the entire fracturing operation can take place at a single central location, which facilitates adherence to pre-set safety parameters. For example, a control center 60 is indicated in FIG. 2 from which operations can be managed via communications link 61. Examples of operations that can be controlled and monitored remotely from control center 60 via communications link 61 can be the power generation function in Area B, or the delivery of treatment fluid from blender module 40 to pumps 22 for delivery to the wellbore.


Comparison Example

Table 1, shown below, compares and contrasts the operational costs and manpower requirements for a conventional diesel powered operation (such as shown in FIG. 1) with those of an electric powered operation (such as shown in FIG. 2).









TABLE 1







Comparison of Conventional Diesel Powered


Operation vs. Electric Powered Operation








Diesel Powered
Electric Powered


Operation
Operation





Total fuel cost (diesel)-
Total fuel cost (natural gas)-


about $80,000 per day
about $2,300 per day


Service interval for diesel engines-
Service interval for electric motor-


about every 200-300 hours
about every 50,000 hours


Dedicated crew size-
Dedicated crew size-


about 40 people
about 10 people









In Table 1, the “Diesel Powered Operation” utilizes at least 24 pumps and 2 blenders, and requires at least 54,000 hp to execute the fracturing program on that location. Each pump burns approximately 300-400 liters per hour of operation, and the blender units burn a comparable amount of diesel fuel. Because of the fuel consumption and fuel capacity of this conventional unit, it requires refueling during operation, which is extremely dangerous and presents a fire hazard. Further, each piece of conventional equipment needs a dedicated tractor to move it and a driver/operator to run it. The crew size required to operate and maintain a conventional operation such as the one in FIG. 1 represents a direct cost for the site operator.


In contrast, the electric powered operation as described herein utilizes a turbine that only consumes about 6 mm scf of natural gas per 24 hours. At current market rates (approximately $2.50 per mmbtu), this equates to a reduction in direct cost to the site operator of over $77,000 per day compared to the diesel powered operation. Also, the service interval on electric motors is about 50,000 hours, which allows the majority of reliability and maintainability costs to disappear. Further, the need for multiple drivers/operators is reduced significantly, and electric powered operation means that a single operator can run the entire system from a central location. Crew size can be reduced by around 75%, as only about 10 people are needed on the same location to accomplish the same tasks as conventional operations, with the 10 people including off-site personnel maintenance personnel. Further, crew size does not change with the amount of equipment used. Thus, the electric powered operation is significantly more economical.


Modular Design and Alternate Embodiments

As discussed above, the modular nature of the electric powered fracturing operation described herein provides significant operational advantages and efficiencies over traditional fracturing systems. Each fracturing module 20 sits on trailer 10 which houses the necessary mounts and manifold systems for low pressure suctions and high pressure discharges. Each fracturing module 20 can be removed from service and replaced without shutting down or compromising the fractioning spread. For instance, pump 22 can be isolated from trailer 10, removed and replaced by a new pump 22 in just a few minutes. If fracturing module 20 requires service, it can be isolated from the fluid lines, unplugged, un-pinned and removed by a forklift. Another fracturing module 20 can be then re-inserted in the same fashion, realizing a drastic time savings. In addition, the removed fracturing module 20 can be repaired or serviced in the field. In contrast, if one of the pumps in a conventional diesel powered system goes down or requires service, the tractor/trailer combination needs to be disconnected from the manifold system and driven out of the location. A replacement unit must then be backed into the line and reconnected. Maneuvering these units in these tight confines is difficult and dangerous.


The presently described electric powered fracturing operation can be easily adapted to accommodate additional types of pumping capabilities as needed. For example, a replacement pumping module can be provided that is adapted for removable mounting on trailer 10. Replacement pumping module can be utilized for pumping liquid nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or other chemicals or fluids as needed, to increase the versatility of the system and broaden operational range and capacity. In a conventional system, if a nitrogen pump is required, a separate unit truck/trailer unit must be brought to the site and tied into the fractioning spread. In contrast, the presently described operation allows for a replacement nitrogen module with generally the same dimensions as fractioning module 20, so that the replacement module can fit into the same slot on the trailer as fractioning module 20 would. Trailer 10 can contain all the necessary electrical power distributions as required for a nitrogen pump module so no modifications are required. The same concept would apply to carbon dioxide pump modules or any other pieces of equipment that would be required. Instead of another truck/trailer, a specialized replacement module can instead be utilized.


Natural gas is considered to be the cleanest, most efficient fuel source available. By designing and constructing “fit for purpose equipment” that is powered by natural gas, it is expected that the fracturing footprint, manpower, and maintenance requirements can each be reduced by over 60% when compared with traditional diesel-powered operations.


In addition, the presently described electric powered fracturing operation resolves or mitigates environmental impacts of traditional diesel-powered operations. For example, the presently described natural gas powered operation can provide a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions as compared to diesel-powered operations. In an illustrative embodiment, a fractioning site utilizing the presently described natural gas powered operation would have a carbon dioxide emissions level of about 2200 kg/hr, depending upon the quality of the fuel gas, which represents an approximately 200% reduction from carbon dioxide emissions of diesel-powered operations. Also, in an illustrative embodiment, the presently described natural gas powered operation would produces no greater than about 80 decibels of sound with a silencer package utilized on turbine 30, which meets OSHA requirements for noise emissions. By comparison, a conventional diesel-powered fractioning pump running at full rpm emits about 105 decibels of sound. When multiple diesel-powered fractioning pumps are running simultaneously, noise is a significant hazard associated with conventional operations.


In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric-powered fractioning operation described herein can also be utilized for offshore oil and gas applications, for example, fracturing of a wellbore at an offshore site. Conventional offshore operations already possess the capacity to generate electric power on-site. These vessels are typically diesel over electric, which means that the diesel powerplant on the vessel generates electricity to meet all power requirements including propulsion. Conversion of offshore pumping services to run from an electrical power supply will allow transported diesel fuel to be used in power generation rather than to drive the fracturing operation, thus reducing diesel fuel consumption. The electric power generated from the offshore vessel's power plant (which is not needed during station keeping) can be utilized to power one or more fracturing modules 10. This is far cleaner, safer and more efficient than using diesel powered equipment. Fracturing modules 10 are also smaller and lighter than the equipment typically used on the deck of offshore vessels, thus removing some of the current ballast issues and allowing more equipment or raw materials to be transported by the offshore vessels.


In a deck layout for a conventional offshore stimulation vessel, skid based, diesel powered pumping equipment and storage facilities on the deck of the vessel create ballast issues. Too much heavy equipment on the deck of the vessel causes the vessel to have higher center of gravity. Also, fuel lines must be run to each piece of equipment greatly increasing the risk of fuel spills. In illustrative embodiments of a deck layout for an offshore vessel utilizing electric-powered fractioning operations as described herein, the physical footprint of the equipment layout is reduced significantly when compared to the conventional layout. More free space is available on deck, and the weight of equipment is dramatically decreased, thus eliminating most of the ballast issues. A vessel already designed as diesel-electric can be utilized. When the vessel is on station at a platform and in station keeping mode, the vast majority of the power that the ship's engines are generating can be run up to the deck to power modules. The storage facilities on the vessel can be placed below deck, further lowering the center of gravity, while additional equipment, for instance, a 3-phase separator, or coiled tubing unit, can be provided on deck, which is difficult in existing diesel-powered vessels. These benefits, coupled with the electronic control system, give a far greater advantage over conventional vessels.


While the present description has specifically contemplated a fracturing system, the system can be used to power pumps for other purposes, or to power other oilfield equipment. For example, high rate and pressure pumping equipment, hydraulic fracturing equipment, well stimulation pumping equipment and/or well servicing equipment could also be powered using the present system. In addition, the system can be adapted for use in other art fields requiring high torque or high rate pumping operations, such as pipeline cleaning or dewatering mines.


It is to be understood that the subject matter herein is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or illustrative embodiments shown and described, as modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. Accordingly, the subject matter is therefore to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A system for hydraulically fracturing underground formations, comprising: one or more transportable electric turbine generators;an electric motor electrically connected to the one or more turbine generators;one or more fracturing fluid pumps, wherein the one or more fracturing fluid pumps are configured to receive one or more conduit to deliver a fracturing fluid into a wellbore;an electric blender system, operatively associated with a dedicated electric power source, capable of providing a blended fracturing fluid to a fracturing pump for delivery to a wellbore operation, comprising:a blender tub;a fluid additive system;a fluid addition source hopper;an inlet electric motor configured to drive an inlet pump, in communication with a fluid additive source and cable of pumping the fluid additive source into and out of the blender tub.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising one or more variable frequency drives in communication with one or more of the electric motors, wherein the variable frequency drives are configured to control the speed of the one or more electric motors.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a control system in communication with one or more of the electric motors and the one or more generators.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the control system is configured to monitor a fracturing fluid pressure of the first fracturing fluid pump.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the control system is configured to monitor a fracturing fluid pressure of the first fracturing fluid pump, the second fracturing fluid pump, or both fracturing fluid pumps.
  • 6. The system of claim 3, wherein the control system is configured to monitor and control the one or more turbine generators.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, further comprising a control system configured to communicate with one or more variable frequency drives to provide fracturing fluid to the wellbore at a constant pressure.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, further comprising a control system configured to communicate with one or more variable frequency drives to provide the fracturing fluid to the wellbore at a constant flow rate.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, further comprising an electrical transformer in electrical communication with the one or more turbine generators.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the electrical transformer steps down a voltage from the one or more turbine generators to a voltage appropriate for at least one of the electric motors.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more turbine generators are powered by natural gas.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more turbine generators are powered by condensate liquid fuel.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more of the electric motors, the one or more turbine generators, and one or more fracturing fluid pumps are located on a transportable trailer.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, further comprising a transformer.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, further comprising one or more variable frequency drives and a control system.
  • 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the turbine generator provides a dedicated source of electrical power for fracturing operations at the wellbore.
  • 17. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more fracturing fluid pumps are capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 RPM and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque.
  • 18. The system of claim 1, wherein one or more fracturing fluid pumps are capable of operating at 2500 hp during fracturing operations.
  • 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises a liquefied petroleum gas.
  • 20. A method of delivering pressurized fluid to a wellbore to be fractured, comprising: providing one or more transportable electric turbine generators; providing an electric motor electrically connected to the one or more turbine generators;providing one or more fracturing fluid pumps configured to receive one or more conduits to deliver a fracturing fluid into a wellbore;providing an electric blender system, operatively associated with a dedicated electric power source, capable of providing a blended fracturing fluid to a fracturing pump for delivery to a wellboreoperation, comprising:a blender tub;a fluid additive system;a fluid addition source hopper;an inlet electric motor configured to drive an inlet pump, in communication with a fluid additive source and capable of pumping the fluid additive source into and out of the blender tub.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, further comprising providing a variable frequency drive in communication with one or more of the electric motors, wherein the variable frequency drive is configured to control the speed of the one or more electric motors.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, further comprising providing a control system in communication with one or more of the electric motors and the one or more generators.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the control system is configured to monitor a fracturing fluid pressure of the first fracturing fluid pump.
  • 24. The method of claim 22, wherein the control system is configured to monitor a fracturing fluid pressure.
  • 25. The method of claim 22, wherein the control system is configured to monitor and control the one or more turbine generators.
  • 26. The method of claim 22, further comprising mounting a transformer, one or more variable frequency drives and a control system on the trailer.
  • 27. The method of claim 22, further comprising a platform structure mounted to the trailer and from which at one or more fracturing fluid pumps are accessible by operations personnel.
  • 28. The method of claim 20, further comprising providing a control system configured to communicate with one or more variable frequency drives to provide fracturing fluid to the wellbore at a constant pressure.
  • 29. The method of claim 20, further comprising providing a control system configured to communicate with one or more variable frequency drives to provide the fracturing fluid to the wellbore at a constant flow rate.
  • 30. The method of claim 20, further comprising providing an electrical transformer in electrical communication with the one or more turbine generators.
  • 31. The method of claim 30, wherein the electrical transformer steps down a voltage from the one or more turbine generators to a voltage for the electric motors.
  • 32. The method of claim 20, wherein the one or more turbine generators are powered by natural gas.
  • 33. The method of claim 20, wherein the one or more turbine generators are powered by condensate liquid fuel.
  • 34. The method of claim 20, further comprising mounting the one or more turbine generators on a trailer, and the one or more fracturing fluid pumps on a trailer.
  • 35. The method of claim 20, wherein the turbine generator provides a dedicated source of electrical power for fracturing operations at the wellbore.
  • 36. The method of claim 20, further comprising supplying a fracturing fluid to the one or more blender systems.
  • 37. The method of claim 36, further comprising introducing a fracturing fluid from the one or more blender systems into one or more fracturing fluid pumps.
  • 38. The method of claim 37, further comprising pumping the fracturing fluid from the one or more fracturing fluid pumps into one or more underground formations.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 16/933,939 filed Jul. 20, 2020 which is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/086,829 filed Mar. 31, 2016 which is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 13/441,334 filed Apr. 6, 2012 and granted as U.S. Pat. No. 9,366,114 on Jun. 14, 2016 which claims the benefit, and priority benefit, of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/472,861 filed Apr. 7, 2011, titled “MOBILE, MODULAR, ELECTRICALLY POWERED SYSTEM FOR USE IN FRACTURING UNDERGROUND FORMATIONS,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (392)
Number Name Date Kind
1740587 Greenfield Dec 1929 A
1753050 Hughes Apr 1930 A
1869859 Morrow Aug 1932 A
1907721 Booth et al. May 1933 A
2272169 Granberg Feb 1942 A
2484321 Stubau Oct 1949 A
2554228 Walker et al. May 1951 A
2814254 Litzenberg Nov 1957 A
2824434 Stern Feb 1958 A
3113620 Hemminger Dec 1963 A
3113621 Krueger et al. Dec 1963 A
3147144 Wilhelm Sep 1964 A
3187958 Swart Jun 1965 A
3525404 Kelly Aug 1970 A
3533605 Futty et al. Oct 1970 A
3722595 Kiel Mar 1973 A
3764233 Strickland Oct 1973 A
3773438 Hall et al. Nov 1973 A
3782695 Sandiford Jan 1974 A
3791682 Mitchell Feb 1974 A
3801229 Henderson Apr 1974 A
3837179 Barth Sep 1974 A
3842910 Zingg et al. Oct 1974 A
3893655 Sandiford Jul 1975 A
3901313 Doniguian Aug 1975 A
4060988 Arnold Dec 1977 A
4100822 Rosman Jul 1978 A
4159180 Cooper Jun 1979 A
4272224 Kabele Jun 1981 A
4311395 Douthitt Jan 1982 A
4341508 Rambin, Jr. Jul 1982 A
4460276 Arribau Jul 1984 A
4471619 Nolley, Jr. Sep 1984 A
4526633 Lawrence et al. Jul 1985 A
4538221 Crain Aug 1985 A
4538222 Crain Aug 1985 A
4557325 Gall Dec 1985 A
4694907 Stahl et al. Sep 1987 A
4779186 Handke Oct 1988 A
4840292 Harvey Jun 1989 A
4850702 Arribau et al. Jul 1989 A
4850750 Cogbill Jul 1989 A
4854714 Davis Aug 1989 A
4916631 Crain Apr 1990 A
5095221 Tyler Mar 1992 A
5184456 Rumford et al. Feb 1993 A
5247991 Polcer Sep 1993 A
5248005 Mochizuki Sep 1993 A
5334898 Skybyk Aug 1994 A
5441340 Cedillo Aug 1995 A
5445223 Nelson Aug 1995 A
5512811 Latos Apr 1996 A
5517822 Haws et al. May 1996 A
5582250 Constien Dec 1996 A
5611732 Tirumalai Mar 1997 A
5778657 Ohtomo et al. Jul 1998 A
5899272 Loree May 1999 A
5907970 Havlovick et al. Jun 1999 A
5975206 Woo Nov 1999 A
6007227 Carlson Dec 1999 A
6024170 McCabe Feb 2000 A
6056521 Leu et al. May 2000 A
6059539 Nyilas et al. May 2000 A
6060436 Snyder May 2000 A
6120175 Tewell Sep 2000 A
6142878 Barin Nov 2000 A
6161386 Lokhandwala Dec 2000 A
6167965 Bearden et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193402 Grimland Feb 2001 B1
6265786 Bosley et al. Jul 2001 B1
6286986 Grimland Sep 2001 B2
6298652 Mittricker et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306800 Samuel Oct 2001 B1
6325142 Bosley et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334746 Nguyen Jan 2002 B1
6398521 Yorulmazoglu Jun 2002 B1
6495929 Bosley et al. Dec 2002 B2
6644844 Neal et al. Nov 2003 B2
6765304 Baten et al. Jul 2004 B2
6773238 Sprakel Aug 2004 B1
6907737 Mittricker et al. Jun 2005 B2
6979116 Cecala et al. Dec 2005 B2
7114322 Yamanaka et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128142 Heathman et al. Oct 2006 B2
7562708 Cogliandro et al. Jul 2009 B2
7563076 Brunet et al. Jul 2009 B2
7581379 Yoshida et al. Sep 2009 B2
7589379 Amaratunga et al. Sep 2009 B2
7608935 Scherzer Oct 2009 B2
7669657 Symington et al. Mar 2010 B2
7677316 Butler et al. Mar 2010 B2
7681647 Mudunuri et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683499 Saucier Mar 2010 B2
7717193 Egilsson et al. May 2010 B2
7819181 Entov et al. Oct 2010 B2
7819209 Bezner Oct 2010 B1
7828057 Kearl et al. Nov 2010 B2
7832257 Weightman et al. Nov 2010 B2
7836949 Dykstra Nov 2010 B2
7841394 McNeel et al. Nov 2010 B2
7845413 Shampine et al. Dec 2010 B2
7908230 Bailey et al. Mar 2011 B2
7921914 Bruins Apr 2011 B2
7926562 Poitzsch et al. Apr 2011 B2
7958716 Zeigenfuss Jun 2011 B2
8025099 Mesher Sep 2011 B2
8056635 Shampine et al. Nov 2011 B2
8083504 Williams Dec 2011 B2
8171993 Hefley May 2012 B2
8253298 Saban et al. Aug 2012 B2
8474521 Kajaria et al. Jul 2013 B2
8632320 Palomba et al. Jan 2014 B2
8789591 Smith Jul 2014 B2
8882336 Wolford Nov 2014 B1
8899823 Oldham Dec 2014 B2
8936097 Heijnen et al. Jan 2015 B2
8951130 Neufelder et al. Feb 2015 B2
8997904 Cryer et al. Apr 2015 B2
9068506 Eleftheriou et al. Jun 2015 B2
9103193 Coli Aug 2015 B2
9121257 Coli Sep 2015 B2
9316216 Cook et al. Apr 2016 B1
9322595 Shinn Apr 2016 B1
9366114 Coli Jun 2016 B2
9395049 Vicknair Jul 2016 B2
9410410 Broussard et al. Aug 2016 B2
9435175 Chong et al. Sep 2016 B2
9452394 Weinstein et al. Sep 2016 B2
9534473 Morris et al. Jan 2017 B2
9556721 Jang et al. Jan 2017 B2
9562420 Morris et al. Feb 2017 B2
9611728 Oehring Apr 2017 B2
9650879 Broussard et al. May 2017 B2
9829002 Crom Nov 2017 B2
9945365 Hernandez Apr 2018 B2
9995218 Oehring et al. Jun 2018 B2
10030579 Austin et al. Jul 2018 B2
10076733 Morris et al. Sep 2018 B2
10107084 Coli Oct 2018 B2
10107085 Coli Oct 2018 B2
10167863 Cook et al. Jan 2019 B1
10221668 Coli Mar 2019 B2
10227855 Coli Mar 2019 B2
10374485 Morris et al. Aug 2019 B2
10378326 Morris et al. Aug 2019 B2
10385669 Hodgson et al. Aug 2019 B2
10415332 Morris et al. Sep 2019 B2
10502042 Coli Dec 2019 B2
10518229 Morris et al. Dec 2019 B2
10519730 Morris et al. Dec 2019 B2
10544753 Filippone Jan 2020 B2
10563490 Ladron de Guevara Rangel Feb 2020 B2
10648312 Coli May 2020 B2
10689961 Coli Jun 2020 B2
10718194 Coli Jul 2020 B2
10718195 Coli et al. Jul 2020 B2
10724353 Coli et al. Jul 2020 B2
10724515 Cook et al. Jul 2020 B1
10774630 Coli et al. Sep 2020 B2
10794165 Fischer et al. Oct 2020 B2
10837270 Coli Nov 2020 B2
10851634 Coli Dec 2020 B2
10876386 Coli Dec 2020 B2
10895138 Coli Jan 2021 B2
10962305 Morris Mar 2021 B2
10982521 Coli et al. Apr 2021 B2
11002125 Coli May 2021 B2
11070109 Morris Jul 2021 B2
11073242 Morris Jul 2021 B2
11118438 Coli Sep 2021 B2
11187069 Coli Nov 2021 B2
11255173 Coli Feb 2022 B2
11359462 Morris et al. Jun 2022 B2
11391133 Coli Jul 2022 B2
11391136 Coli Jul 2022 B2
11434763 Morris et al. Sep 2022 B2
20010000996 Grimland et al. May 2001 A1
20010052704 Bosley et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002101 Hayashi Jan 2002 A1
20030057704 Baten et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030079479 Kristich et al. May 2003 A1
20030161212 Neal Aug 2003 A1
20030178195 Agee et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040008571 Coody Jan 2004 A1
20040011523 Sarada Jan 2004 A1
20040042335 Cecala et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040104577 Alger et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040141412 Midas et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040179961 Pugnet et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040188360 Armstrong et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040219040 Kugelev et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050017723 Entov et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050029476 Biester Feb 2005 A1
20050103286 Ji May 2005 A1
20050196298 Manning Sep 2005 A1
20050248334 Dagenias et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060042259 Marushima et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060054318 Sarada Mar 2006 A1
20060060381 Heathman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060065400 Smith Mar 2006 A1
20060080971 Smith Apr 2006 A1
20060175064 Yuratich Aug 2006 A1
20060225402 Kierspe et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228233 Cook Oct 2006 A1
20060254281 Badeer et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060260331 Andreychuk Nov 2006 A1
20060278394 Stover Dec 2006 A1
20070029090 Andreychuk et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070099746 Hahlbeck May 2007 A1
20070125544 Robinson et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070132243 Wurtele et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070201305 Heilman et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070203991 Fisher et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070204991 Loree et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070256424 Briesch et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070256830 Entov et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277982 Shampine et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080006089 Adnan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080017369 Sarada Jan 2008 A1
20080029267 Shampine et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080044298 Laski Feb 2008 A1
20080048456 Browning et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080064569 Baxter et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066911 Luharuka et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080203734 Grimes et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080217024 Moore Sep 2008 A1
20080236818 Dykstra Oct 2008 A1
20080264625 Ochoa Oct 2008 A1
20080264640 Eslinger Oct 2008 A1
20080264641 Slabaugh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080264649 Crawford Oct 2008 A1
20080267785 Cervenka et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090068031 Gambier et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090084558 Bloom Apr 2009 A1
20090090504 Weightman et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090092510 Williams Apr 2009 A1
20090093317 Kajiwara et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090095482 Surjaatmadja Apr 2009 A1
20090101410 Egilsson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090120635 Neal May 2009 A1
20090145660 Johnson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090194280 Gil et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090308602 Bruins et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100000221 Pfefferle Jan 2010 A1
20100032663 Bulovic et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100038077 Heilman et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100038907 Hunt et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100048429 Dobson, Jr. Feb 2010 A1
20100051272 Loree Mar 2010 A1
20100068071 Bowden Mar 2010 A1
20100071561 Marwitz et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071899 Coquilleau et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100089126 Sweeney Apr 2010 A1
20100089589 Crawford et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100132949 DeFosse et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100310384 Stephenson et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100326663 Bobier et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100329072 Hagan et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110024129 Turakhia Feb 2011 A1
20110030951 Irvine et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110036584 Weightman et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110067882 Yeriazarian et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067885 Shampine et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110073599 Nieves Mar 2011 A1
20110085924 Shampine et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110175579 Mazumdar Jul 2011 A1
20110179799 Allam et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110185702 Bilton et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110198089 Panga et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110206537 Simpson Aug 2011 A1
20110236225 Leugemors et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110247334 Alexander Oct 2011 A1
20110272158 Neal Nov 2011 A1
20110286858 England et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110303323 Ding et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120006550 Shampine et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120067568 Palmer et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120085541 Love et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120181015 Kajaria et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120223524 Williams Sep 2012 A1
20120255734 Coli et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120312531 Eslinger Dec 2012 A1
20130045117 Wishart Feb 2013 A1
20130098619 Shampine et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130150268 Oldham Jun 2013 A1
20130161016 Loree et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130306322 Sanborn et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140000899 Nevison Jan 2014 A1
20140010671 Cryer et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140027386 Munisteri Jan 2014 A1
20140039708 Curtis et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140048253 Andreychuck Feb 2014 A1
20140060774 Motakef et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140069651 Shampine et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140102127 Yum et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140124208 Loree et al. May 2014 A1
20140147291 Burnette May 2014 A1
20140205475 Dale Jul 2014 A1
20140219824 Burnette Aug 2014 A1
20140238683 Korach et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140251623 Lestz et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140255214 Burnette Sep 2014 A1
20140262292 Joseph et al. Sep 2014 A1
20150036453 Wolford Feb 2015 A1
20150068724 Coli Mar 2015 A1
20150068754 Coli Mar 2015 A1
20150083235 Larson Mar 2015 A1
20150114652 Lestz et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150129082 Murphy et al. May 2015 A1
20150162427 Lee et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150204173 Shampine et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150240996 Kapoor Aug 2015 A1
20150300291 Yamanaka et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160061061 Ekanayake et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160102612 Kaufman Apr 2016 A1
20160175793 Granados Jun 2016 A1
20160177675 Morris Jun 2016 A1
20160177678 Morris et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160208593 Coli Jul 2016 A1
20160208594 Coli Jul 2016 A1
20160248230 Tawy et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160258267 Payne et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160273328 Oehring Sep 2016 A1
20160326854 Broussaed Nov 2016 A1
20160326855 Coli Nov 2016 A1
20160348479 Oehring et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160369609 Morris Dec 2016 A1
20170016433 Chong et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170036178 Coli Feb 2017 A1
20170037718 Coli Feb 2017 A1
20170104389 Morris Apr 2017 A1
20170129338 Cryer et al. May 2017 A1
20170145918 Oehring et al. May 2017 A1
20170218727 Oehring et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170218843 Oehring et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170222409 Oehring et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170259227 Morris Sep 2017 A1
20170284484 Bickmann, III et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170302135 Cory Oct 2017 A1
20170322086 Luharuka et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180007173 Wang et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180044307 Sathe et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180075034 Wang et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180080377 Austin et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180156210 Oehring et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180202356 Godman Jul 2018 A1
20180299878 Cella et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180339278 Morris et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180363434 Coli Dec 2018 A1
20180363435 Coli Dec 2018 A1
20180363436 Coli Dec 2018 A1
20180363437 Coli Dec 2018 A1
20180363438 Coli Dec 2018 A1
20180374607 Hernandez Marti et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190003272 Morris et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190003329 Morris et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190055827 Coli Feb 2019 A1
20190063341 Davis Feb 2019 A1
20190112908 Coli Apr 2019 A1
20190120024 Oehring et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190169971 Oehring et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190203572 Morris et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190204021 Morris et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190211661 Reckels et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190271218 Coli Sep 2019 A1
20190277125 Coli Sep 2019 A1
20190277126 Coli Sep 2019 A1
20190277127 Coli Sep 2019 A1
20190277128 Coli Sep 2019 A1
20190353303 Morris et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190356199 Morris et al. Nov 2019 A1
20200040705 Morris et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200040762 Boyce et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200040878 Morris Feb 2020 A1
20200087997 Morris et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200109616 Oehring et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200109617 Oehring et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200208565 Morris Jul 2020 A1
20200318467 Coli Oct 2020 A1
20200347710 Coli Nov 2020 A1
20200347711 Coli Nov 2020 A1
20200347725 Morris et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210025324 Morris et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210025383 Bodishbaugh et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210062631 Coli Mar 2021 A1
20210102531 Bodishbaugh et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210140295 Coli May 2021 A1
20210215440 Morris Jul 2021 A1
20210363869 Coli Nov 2021 A1
20220056794 Coli Feb 2022 A1
20220056795 Coli Feb 2022 A1
20220356792 Coli Nov 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (78)
Number Date Country
103159 Nov 2017 AR
103160 Nov 2017 AR
087298 Dec 2017 AR
092923 Dec 2017 AR
104823 Dec 2017 AR
104824 Dec 2017 AR
104825 Dec 2017 AR
104826 Dec 2017 AR
2015364678 Mar 2019 AU
2017229475 May 2020 AU
2019200899 Sep 2020 AU
2279320 Apr 2000 CA
2547970 Dec 2006 CA
2514658 Mar 2007 CA
2653069 Dec 2007 CA
2678638 Nov 2008 CA
2684598 Feb 2009 CA
2639418 Mar 2009 CA
2700385 Apr 2009 CA
2679812 Mar 2010 CA
2955706 Oct 2012 CA
2773843 Jan 2016 CA
2835904 Feb 2017 CA
2845347 May 2018 CA
2900387 Sep 2018 CA
2970542 Sep 2018 CA
2970527 Aug 2019 CA
201461291 May 2010 CN
102171060 Aug 2011 CN
102602323 Jul 2012 CN
103016362 Apr 2013 CN
102602322 Apr 2014 CN
107208557 Sep 2017 CN
207194878 Apr 2018 CN
105937557 Jul 2018 CN
ZL201580074219.9 Sep 2019 CN
110513155 Nov 2019 CN
19707654 Aug 1998 DE
1574714 Sep 2005 EP
2904200 Aug 2015 EP
3025019 Feb 2018 EP
3444431 Feb 2019 EP
3447239 Feb 2019 EP
2726705 Mar 2019 EP
3444430 Mar 2019 EP
3444432 Mar 2019 EP
3453827 Mar 2019 EP
3456915 Mar 2019 EP
3234321 Feb 2020 EP
3719281 Oct 2020 EP
3426888 Apr 2021 EP
976279 Nov 1964 GB
2351125 Dec 2000 GB
2404253 Jan 2005 GB
6415748 Oct 2018 JP
10-1948225 Feb 2019 KR
10-1981198 May 2019 KR
358054 Aug 2018 MX
362628 Jan 2019 MX
8103143 Nov 1981 WO
2001094786 Dec 2001 WO
2007011812 Jan 2007 WO
2007096660 Aug 2007 WO
2007098606 Sep 2007 WO
2007141715 Dec 2007 WO
2008117048 Oct 2008 WO
2009070876 Jun 2009 WO
2010141232 Dec 2010 WO
2011070244 Jun 2011 WO
2012137068 Oct 2012 WO
2013170375 Nov 2013 WO
2014053056 Apr 2014 WO
2014102127 Jul 2014 WO
2018044307 Mar 2018 WO
2018071738 Apr 2018 WO
2018075034 Apr 2018 WO
2018204293 Nov 2018 WO
2021021664 Feb 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (141)
Entry
TB Wood's Altra Industrial Motion; Flexible Couplings; May 2021; 104 pages.
Wadman, Bruce W.; 2000 HP Gas Turbine Fracturing Rig; Diesel and Gas Turbine Process; XP008074468; Aug. 1966; pp. 36-37.
Grynning, Audun et al.; Tyrihans Raw Seawater Injection; Offshore Technology conference; 2009; 18 pages.
Overli, Jan M. et al.; A Survey of Platform Machinery in the North Sea; The American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1992; 10 pages.
Frei, Arno et al.; Design of Pump Shaft Trains Having Variable-Speed Electric Motors; Proceedings of the Third International Pump Symposium; pp. 33-44; 1986.
TB Wood's Dura-Flex Couplings for Mobile Hydraulic Fracturing Pump System; May 20, 2013; 5 pages; https://www.tbwoods.com/newsroom/2013/05/Dura-Flex-Couplings-for-Mobile-Hydraulic-Fracturing-Pump-System.
ENG Tips; Finding Motor with Two Shaft Ends and Two Flanges; Oct. 20, 2012; 2 pages; https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=332087.
European Patent Office; Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 13843467.5; Jul. 13, 2021, 13 pages; Europe.
Argentinian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection with P180100424; dated Dec. 21, 2021; 5 pages; Argentina.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC; dated Oct. 7, 2021; 4 pages; Europe.
Brazilian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR112013025880-2; dated Nov. 18, 2021; 6 pages; Brazil.
Schlumberger; JET Manual 23: Fracturing Pump Units, SPF/SPS-343; Version 1.0; Jan. 31, 2007; 68 pages.
Mexican Institute of Industrial Property; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/000776; dated Feb. 16, 2022; 4 pages; Mexico.
Mexican Institute of Industrial Property; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/009488; dated Jun. 23, 2022; 4 pages; Mexico.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025435-1; dated Apr. 28, 2022; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025423-8; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025434-3; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 16 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025416-5; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025438-6; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 21 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025438-6; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025428-9; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025428-9; dated Aug. 31, 2022; 13 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025420-3; dated Apr. 27, 2022; 15 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025420-3; dated Aug. 31, 2022; 13 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025441-6; dated Apr. 29, 2022; 15 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025441-6; dated Sep. 30, 2022; 13 pages; Brazil.
European Patent Office; Brief Communication, issued in connection to application No. 13843467.5; dated Feb. 10, 2022, 11 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Decision to Refuse a European Patent Application, issued in connection to application No. 13843467.5; dated Mar. 31, 2022, 21 pages; Europe.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025337-1; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025337-1; dated Jul. 11, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025361-4; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025361-4; dated Jul. 11, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025350-9; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025342-8; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025357-6; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025369-0; dated Jul. 11, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025369-0; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025374-6; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC; dated Jun. 2, 2022; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC; dated Jul. 21, 2022; 4 pages; Europe.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection with application No. 3112566; dated May 24, 2022; 9 pages; Canada.
Notice of Related Applications; filed in connection to U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,553; dated May 22, 2019; 7 pages; US.
The International Bureau of WIPO; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued in connection to PCT/CA2013/000845; dated Apr. 7, 2015; 8 pages; Canada.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT counterpart Application No. PCT/IB2012/000832 dated Sep. 13, 2012, 12 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/IB2012/000832 dated Sep. 13, 2012, 12 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT counterpart Application No. PCT/CA2013/000845 dated Jan. 8, 2014, 12 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/CA2013/000845 dated Jan. 8, 2014, 12 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US15/66133 dated Mar. 2, 2016, 10 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US15/66114 dated May 25, 2016, 8 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US16/49777 dated Nov. 21, 2016, 10 pages.
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US17/21181 dated May 25, 2017, 10 pages.
Int'l Search Report filed in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/039982 dated Sep. 11, 2018, 8 pages.
Int'l Search Report filed in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/039976 dated Nov. 5, 2018, 12 pages.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion issued copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/068103 dated May 7, 2019, 11 pages.
Int'l Search Report & Written Opinion received in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US19/32645, dated Jul. 15, 2019, 10 pages.
Int'l Search Report received in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/043982 dated Oct. 9, 2019, 8 pages.
Int'l Search Report received in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/043303 dated Nov. 12, 2019, 13 pages.
PCT/US2019/66907 Int'l Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, 12 pages.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/030306 dated Jul. 28, 2020, 14 pages.
Int'l Search Report dated Oct. 8, 2020, issued in the prosecution of patent application PCT/US20/43583, 19 pages.
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/055592; dated Jan. 21, 2021: pp. 1-15.
Argentinian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection with P180100416; dated Nov. 4, 2019; 5 pages; Argentina.
National Institute of the Industrial Property of Argentina, Second Office Action, issued in connection to application No. 20160102674; dated Feb. 2, 2021; 4 pages; Argentina.
Industrial Property Review of Brazil, Office Action, issued in connection with application No. BR112015007587-8; dated Feb. 18, 2020; 5 pages; Brazil.
Foreign Communication from a related counterpart application; Canadian Application No. 2,835,904; Canadian Office Action; dated Jan. 19, 2015; 4 pages; Canada.
Foreign Communication From a Related Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2,835,904 Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2015, 4 pages.
Foreign Communication From a Related Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2,845,347 Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2015, 4 pages.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2829422; dated Feb. 26, 2019; 5 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2829422; dated Feb. 26, 2019; 1 page; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2955706; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 3 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2955706; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 1 page; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2966672; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 3 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2966672; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 1 page; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2900387; dated Apr. 25, 2017; 4 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2900387; dated Apr. 17, 2017; 1 page; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to CA2955706; dated Jul. 12, 2019; 3 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to CA2955706; dated Mar. 4, 2020; 3 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner Report, issued in connection to application No. 3060766; dated Jan. 6, 2021; 4 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner Report, issued in connection to application No. 3087558; dated Aug. 31, 2020; 4 pages; Canada.
European Patent Office, Supplemental Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2016 for Application No. EP12767292.1, 8 pages.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP13843467.5; dated Nov. 28, 2016; 8 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP12767292.1; dated Mar. 10, 2016; 8 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18188786.0; dated Feb. 14, 2019; 7 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189394.2; dated Nov. 19, 2018; 7 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189396.7; dated Feb. 8, 2019; 11 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189400.7; dated Nov. 19, 2018; 7 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189402.3; dated Jan. 7, 2019; 7 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18194529.6; dated Dec. 19, 2018; 7 pages; Europe.
EPO Search Report filed in EP counterpart Application No. 15870991.5 dated Oct. 15, 2018, 13 pages.
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP13843467.5; dated Jun. 14, 2018; 7 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in conneciton to EP18189396.7; dated May 13, 2019; 10 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP18189396.7; dated Apr. 9, 2020; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. EP18189402.3; dated Jul. 31, 2020; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18189396.7; dated Dec. 11, 2020; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18194529.6; dated Nov. 17, 2020; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18189402.3; dated Feb. 24, 2021; 5 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18189400.7; dated Apr. 8, 2021; 4 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. EP18189400.7; dated Jul. 27, 2020; 4 pages; Europe.
EPO Search Report received in copending EP Application No. 17763916 dated Oct. 16, 2019, 8 pages.
Extended Search Report for European application No. 20156440.8 dated Sep. 3, 2020, 7 pages.
Mexican Patent Office; Official Action, issued in connection to MX/a2018/000772; 1 page; Mexico.
Mexican Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/000772; dated Jul. 20, 2020; 7 pages; Mexico.
Mexican Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2019/001247; dated Jan. 12, 2021; 4 pages; Mexico.
Mexican Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/000772; dated Mar. 18, 2021; 6 pages; Mexico.
Gardner Denver, Inc., Outline-Bare Unit, Nov. 2011, 1 page, Tulsa, OK USA.
C-2500 Quintuplex Intermittent Duty Performance Ratings Displacement at Pump RPM—Well Stimulation and Intermittent Application; Bulleting: WS: 08-02-0801: www.gardenerdenver.com; 2 pages; retrievd from: http://gardenerdenverpumps.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/1050-c-2500-quintuplex-well-service-pump.pdf on Dec. 7, 2018.
Podsada, Janice. The Hartford Courant. “Pratt & Whitney Celebrates Completion of 50th FT8 MobilePac Power Generator.” Jul. 18, 2011.
Powerpoint presentation: TM2500 & TM2500+ Mobile Gas Turbine Generator; retrieved Oct. 9, 2014 from www.scawa.com/files/SCA_TM2500.pdf.
Toshiba G9/H9 Adjustable Speed Drive Engineering Specification: ASD Applications and Marketing. Feb. 13, 2008.
Gardner Denver, Inc., GD-2500 Quintuplex Well Service Pump, 2003, 2 pages, USA.
Gardner Denver, Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000 Quintuplex, Power End Parts List, 300FWF997 Rev G, Apr. 2007, 15 pages, Tulsa, OK USA.
Gardner Denver Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000, GD0-25000-HD, Quintuplex Pumps; GWS Fluid End Parts List, 302FWF997 Rev H, Jul. 2008, 39 pages, Tulsa, OK USA.
Gardner Denver, Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000 Quintuplex, Operating and Service Manual, 300FWF996 Revision F, Apr. 2011, 50 pages, Tulsa, OK USA.
Gardner Denver, Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000, GD-25000-HD, Quintuplex Pumps, Standard Fluid End Parts List, 301 FWF997 Rev J, Jul. 2011, 40 pages, Tulsa, OK USA.
“The Application of Flexible Couplings for Turbomachinery”, Robert E. Munyon, John R. Mancuso and C.B. Gibbons, Proceedings of the 18th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 1989, pp. 1-11.
Frac Water Heater, www.alliedoilfield.com, Oct. 18, 2017, 3 pages.
Frac Tank Heating, McAdaFluidsHeatingServices, mcadafluidsheating.comffrac-tank-heating, Oct. 18, 2017, 2 pages.
Firestream Water Heaters for Fracking, www.heatec.com, Oct. 18, 2017, 4 pages.
Kraken Tri-Fuel Superheater Technology, Aggreko, Oct. 18, 2017, 2 pages.
Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary entry for “triplex pump”, accessed Apr. 9, 2021 via www.glossary.oilfield.com; 1 page.
National Oilwell Varco; Reciprocating Plunger Pumps: Installation, Care and Operation Manual; Revised Sep. 2, 2010; 30 pages.
MC Technologies; Operation and Maintenance Manual, Pump Assembly Operating Manual, Well Service Pump, Doc. No. OMM50003255, May 26, 2015, 98 pages.
National Oilwell Varco; Installation, Care and Operation Manual; 29 pages; www.nov.com.
Argentinian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection with P180100424; dated Jun. 16, 2021; 4 pages; Argentina.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to application No. 3081005; dated Jun. 7, 2021; 3 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to application No. 3081010; dated Jun. 8, 2021; 3 pages; Canada.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to application No. 3080744; dated Jun. 7, 2021; 4 pages; Canada.
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in connection to application No. 21150745.4; dated May 20, 2020; 7 pages; Europe.
Brazilian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR112013025880-2; dated May 19, 2021; 6 pages; Brazil.
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP18188786.0; dated Jul. 22, 2021; 3 pages; Europe.
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP18194529.6; dated Jul. 23, 2021; 3 pages; Europe.
Brooksbank, David; Coupling Types for Different Applications; Altra Industrial Motion; Dec. 17, 2011;6 pages.
Altra Industrial Motion; Altra Couplings offers the largest selection of Industrial couplings available from a single souce . . . worldwide; May 23, 2013; 1 page.
Sulzer Pumps Finland Oy; MPP High Performance Multi-Phase Pump; Jun. 2004; 12 pages.
Moore, Jesse C.; Electric Motors for Centrifugal Compressor Drives; General Electric Co.; Dec. 31, 1973; pp. 74-83.
Grimstad, Haakon J. et al.; Subsea Multiphase Boosting—Maturing Technology Applied for Santos Ltd's Mutineer and Exeter Field; SPE88562; Oct. 18, 2004; 10 pages.
Pettigrew, Dana et al.; Use of Untreated Subsurface Non-Potable Water for Frac Operations; SPE162102; Oct. 30, 2012; 13 pages.
Wang, Renguang et al.; One Electric Motor System for Steering Hydraulic Pump and Braking Air Pump in HEV BuS; Mar. 15, 2012; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.; vols. 490-495; pp. 910-913.
Dean, Alan; Taming Vibration Demonds with Flexible Couplings; Jun. 2005; World Pumps; pp. 44-47.
Mancuso, Jon; And You Thought All Felxible Pumps Couplings Were the Same; Apr. 2004; World Pumps; pp. 25-29.
Johnson, C.M. et al.; An Introduction to Flexible Couplings; Dec. 1996; World Pumps; pp. 38-43.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220356791 A1 Nov 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61472861 Apr 2011 US
Continuations (5)
Number Date Country
Parent 16933939 Jul 2020 US
Child 17868762 US
Parent 16423091 May 2019 US
Child 16933939 US
Parent 16110794 Aug 2018 US
Child 16423091 US
Parent 15086829 Mar 2016 US
Child 16110794 US
Parent 13441334 Apr 2012 US
Child 15086829 US