This invention relates generally to hydraulic stimulation of underground hydrocarbon-bearing formations, and more particularly, to the generation and use of electrical power to deliver fracturing fluid to a wellbore.
Over the life cycle of a typical hydrocarbon-producing wellbore, various fluids (along with additives, proppants, gels, cement, etc. . . . ) can be delivered to the wellbore under pressure and injected into the wellbore. Surface pumping systems must be able to accommodate these various fluids. Such pumping systems are typically mobilized on skids or tractor-trailers and powered using diesel motors.
Technological advances have greatly improved the ability to identify and recover unconventional oil and gas resources. Notably, horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracturing have led to the emergence of new opportunities for natural gas production from shale formations. For example, more than twenty fractured intervals have been reported in a single horizontal wellbore in a tight natural gas formation. However, significant fracturing operations are required to recover these resources.
Currently contemplated natural gas recovery opportunities require considerable operational infrastructure, including large investments in fracturing equipment and related personnel. Notably, standard fluid pumps require large volumes of diesel fuel and extensive equipment maintenance programs. Typically, each fluid pump is housed on a dedicated truck and trailer configuration. With average fracturing operations requiring as many as fifty fluid pumps, the on-site area, or “footprint”, required to accommodate these fracturing operations is massive. As a result, the operational infrastructure required to support these fracturing operations is extensive. Greater operational efficiencies in the recovery of natural gas would be desirable.
When planning large fracturing operations, one major logistical concern is the availability of diesel fuel. The excessive volumes of diesel fuel required necessitates constant transportation of diesel tankers to the site, and results in significant carbon dioxide emissions. Others have attempted to decrease fuel consumption and emissions by running large pump engines on “Bi-Fuel”, blending natural gas and diesel fuel together, but with limited success. Further, attempts to decrease the number of personnel on-site by implementing remote monitoring and operational control have not been successful, as personnel are still required on-site to transport the equipment and fuel to and from the location.
Various illustrative embodiments of a system and method for hydraulic stimulation of underground hydrocarbon-bearing formations are provided herein. In accordance with an aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method of delivering fracturing fluid to a wellbore is provided. The method can comprise the steps of: providing a dedicated source of electric power at a site containing a wellbore to be fractured; providing one or more electric fracturing modules at the site, each electric fracturing module comprising an electric motor and a coupled fluid pump, each electric motor operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power; providing a wellbore treatment fluid for pressurized delivery to a wellbore, wherein the wellbore treatment fluid can be continuous with the fluid pump and with the wellbore; and operating the fracturing unit using electric power from the dedicated source to pump the treatment fluid to the wellbore.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the dedicated source of electrical power is a turbine generator. A source of natural gas can be provided, whereby the natural gas drives the turbine generator in the production of electrical power. For example, natural gas can be provided by pipeline, or natural gas produced on-site. Liquid fuels such as condensate can also be provided to drive the turbine generator.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric motor can be an AC permanent magnet motor and/or a variable speed motor. The electric motor can be capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 rpms and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque. The pump can be a triplex or quintiplex plunger style fluid pump.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the method can further comprise the steps of: providing an electric blender module continuous and/or operatively associated with the fluid pump, the blender module comprising: a fluid source, a fluid additive source, and a centrifugal blender tub, and supplying electric power from the dedicated source to the blender module to effect blending of the fluid with fluid additives to generate the treatment fluid.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a system for use in delivering pressurized fluid to a wellbore is provided. The system can comprise: a well site comprising a wellbore and a dedicated source of electricity; an electrically powered fracturing module operatively associated with the dedicated source of electricity, the electrically powered fracturing module comprising an electric motor and a fluid pump coupled to the electric motor; a source of treatment fluid, wherein the treatment fluid can be continuous with the fluid pump and with the wellbore; and a control system for regulating the fracturing module in delivery of treatment fluid from the treatment fluid source to the wellbore.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the source of treatment fluid can comprise an electrically powered blender module operatively associated with the dedicated source of electricity. The system can further comprise a fracturing trailer at the well site for housing one or more fracturing modules. Each fracturing module can be adapted for removable mounting on the trailer. The system can further comprise a replacement pumping module comprising a pump and an electric motor, the replacement pumping module adapted for removable mounting on the trailer. In certain illustrative embodiments, the replacement pumping module can be a nitrogen pumping module, or a carbon dioxide pumping module. The replacement pumping module can be, for example, a high torque, low rate motor or a low torque, high rate motor.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a fracturing module for use in delivering pressurized fluid to a wellbore is provided. The fracturing module can comprise: an AC permanent magnet motor capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 rpms and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque; and a plunger-style fluid pump coupled to the motor.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, a method of blending a fracturing fluid for delivery to a wellbore to be fractured is provided. A dedicated source of electric power can be provided at a site containing a wellbore to be fractured. At least one electric blender module can be provided at the site. The electric blender module can include a fluid source, a fluid additive source, and a blender tub. Electric power can be supplied from the dedicated source to the electric blender module to effect blending of a fluid from the fluid source with a fluid additive from the fluid additive source to generate the fracturing fluid. The dedicated source of electrical power can be a turbine generator. A source of natural gas can be provided, wherein the natural gas is used to drive the turbine generator in the production of electrical power. The fluid from the fluid source can be blended with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source in the blender tub. The electric blender module can also include at least one electric motor that is operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power and that effects blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric blender module can include a first electric motor and a second electric motor, each of which is operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power. The first electric motor can effect delivery of the fluid from the fluid source to the blending tub. The second electric motor can effect blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source in the blending tub. In certain illustrative embodiments, an optional third electric motor may also be present, that can also be operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power. The third electric motor can effect delivery of the fluid additive from the fluid additive source to the blending tub.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric blender module can include a first blender unit and a second blender unit, each disposed adjacent to the other on the blender module and each capable of independent operation, or collectively capable of cooperative operation, as desired. The first blender unit and the second blender unit can each include a fluid source, a fluid additive source, and a blender tub. The first blender unit and the second blender unit can each have at least one electric motor that is operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power and that effects blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source. Alternatively, the first blender unit and the second blender unit can each have a first electric motor and a second electric motor, both operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power, wherein the first electric motor effects delivery of the fluid from the fluid source to the blending tub and the second electric motor effects blending of the fluid from the fluid source with the fluid additive from the fluid additive source in the blending tub. In certain illustrative embodiments, the first blender unit and the second blender unit can each also have a third electric motor operatively associated with the dedicated source of electric power, wherein the third electric motor effects delivery of the fluid additive from the fluid additive source to the blending tub.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed subject matter, an electric blender module for use in delivering a blended fracturing fluid to a wellbore is provided. The electric blender module can include a first electrically driven blender unit and a first inlet manifold coupled to the first electrically driven blender unit and capable of delivering an unblended fracturing fluid thereto. A first outlet manifold can be coupled to the first electrically driven blender unit and can be capable of delivering the blended fracturing fluid away therefrom. A second electrically driven blender unit can be provided. A second inlet manifold can be coupled to the second electrically driven blender unit and capable of delivering the unblended fracturing fluid thereto. A second outlet manifold can be coupled to the second electrically driven blender unit and can be capable of delivering the blended fracturing fluid away therefrom. An inlet crossing line can be coupled to both the first inlet manifold and the second inlet manifold and can be capable of delivering the unblended fracturing fluid therebetween. An outlet crossing line can be coupled to both the first outlet manifold and the second outlet manifold and can be capable of delivering the blended fracturing fluid therebetween. A skid can be provided for housing the first electrically driven blender unit, the first inlet manifold, the second electrically driven blender unit, and the second inlet manifold.
Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
A better understanding of the presently disclosed subject matter can be obtained when the following detailed description is considered in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein:
The presently disclosed subject matter generally relates to an electrically powered fracturing system and a system and method for providing on-site electrical power and delivering fracturing fluid to a wellbore at a fracturing operation.
In a conventional fracturing operation, a “slurry” of fluids and additives is injected into a hydrocarbon bearing rock formation at a wellbore to propagate fracturing. Low pressure fluids are mixed with chemicals, sand, and, if necessary, acid, and then transferred at medium pressure and high rate to vertical and/or deviated portions of the wellbore via multiple high pressure, plunger style pumps driven by diesel fueled prime movers. The majority of the fluids injected will be flowed back through the wellbore and recovered, while the sand will remain in the newly created fracture, thus “propping” it open and providing a permeable membrane for hydrocarbon fluids and gases to flow through so they may be recovered.
According to the illustrative embodiments described herein, natural gas (either supplied to the site or produced on-site) can be used to drive a dedicated source of electrical power, such as a turbine generator, for hydrocarbon-producing wellbore completions. A scalable, electrically powered fracturing fleet is provided to deliver pressurized treatment fluid, such as fracturing fluid, to a wellbore in a fracturing operation, obviating the need for a constant supply of diesel fuel to the site and reducing the site footprint and infrastructure required for the fracturing operation, when compared with conventional operations. The treatment fluid provided for pressurized delivery to the wellbore can be continuous with the wellbore and with one or more components of the fracturing fleet, in certain illustrative embodiments. In these embodiments, continuous generally means that downhole hydrodynamics are dependent upon constant flow (rate and pressure) of the delivered fluids, and that there should not be any interruption in fluid flow during delivery to the wellbore if the fracture is to propagate as desired. However, it should not be interpreted to mean that operations of the fracturing fleet cannot generally be stopped and started, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
With reference to
With reference to
Notably, the setup of
With reference to the illustrative embodiments of
Electrical Power Generation
The use of a turbine to directly drive a pump has been previously explored. In such systems, a transmission is used to regulate turbine power to the pump to allow for speed and torque control. In the present operation, natural gas is instead used to drive a dedicated power source in the production of electricity. In illustrative embodiments, the dedicated power source is an on-site turbine generator. The need for a transmission is eliminated, and generated electricity can be used to power the fracturing modules, blenders, and other on-site operations as necessary.
Grid power may be accessible on-site in certain fracturing operations, but the use of a dedicated power source is preferred. During startup of a fracturing operation, massive amounts of power are required such that the use of grid power would be impractical. Natural gas powered generators are more suitable for this application based on the likely availability of natural gas on-site and the capacity of natural gas generators for producing large amounts of power. Notably, the potential for very large instantaneous adjustments in power drawn from the grid during a fracturing operation could jeopardize the stability and reliability of the grid power system. Accordingly, a site-generated and dedicated source of electricity provides a more feasible solution in powering an electric fracturing system. In addition, a dedicated on-site operation can be used to provide power to operate other local equipment, including coiled tubing systems, service rigs, etc. . . . .
In an illustrative embodiment, a single natural gas powered turbine generator 30, as housed in a restricted area C of
Fracturing Module
With reference to
Electric motor 21 is operatively associated with turbine generator 30, in certain embodiments. Typically, each fracturing module 20 will be associated with a drive housing for controlling electric motor 21 and pumps 22, as well as an electrical transformer and drive unit 62 (see
Each pump 22 and electric motor 21 are modular in nature so as to simplify removal and replacement from fracturing module 20 for maintenance purposes. Removal of a single fracturing module 20 from trailer 10 is also simplified. For example, any fracturing module 20 can be unplugged and unpinned from trailer 10 and removed, and another fracturing module 20 can be installed in its place in a matter of minutes.
In the illustrative embodiment of
In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can include a electric motor 21 that is an AC permanent magnet motor capable of operation in the range of up to 1500 rpms and up to 20,000 ft/lbs of torque. Fracturing module 20 can also include a pump 22 that is a plunger-style fluid pump coupled to electric motor 21. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have dimensions of approximately 136″ width×108″ length×100″ height. These dimensions would allow fracturing module 20 to be easily portable and fit with a ISO intermodal container for shipping purposes without the need for disassembly. Standard sized ISO container lengths are typically 20′, 40′ or 53′. In certain illustrative embodiments, fracturing module 20 can have dimensions of no greater than 136″ width×108″ length×100″ height. These dimensions for fracturing module 20 would also allow crew members to easily fit within the confines of fracturing module 20 to make repairs, as illustrated in
Electric Motor
With reference to the illustrative embodiments of
Blender
For greater efficiency, conventional diesel powered blenders and chemical addition units can be replaced with electrically powered blender units. In certain illustrative embodiments as described herein, the electrically powered blender units can be modular in nature for housing on trailer 10 in place of fracturing module 20, or housed independently for association with each trailer 10. An electric blending operation permits greater accuracy and control of fracturing fluid additives. Further, the centrifugal blender tubs typically used with blending trailers to blend fluids with proppant, sand, chemicals, acid, etc. . . . prior to delivery to the wellbore are a common source of maintenance costs in traditional fracturing operations.
With reference to
In certain illustrative embodiments, blender module 40 can have a dual configuration, with a first blender unit 47a and a second blender unit 47b positioned adjacent to each other. This dual configuration is designed to provide redundancy and to facilitate access for maintenance and replacement of components as needed. In certain embodiments, each blender unit 47a and 47b can have its own electrically-powered suction and tub motors disposed thereon, and optionally, other electrically-powered motors can be utilized for chemical additional and/or other ancillary operational functions, as discussed further herein.
For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, first blender unit 47a can have a plurality of electric motors including a first electric motor 43a and a second electric motor 41a that are used to drive various components of blender module 40. Electric motors 41a and 43a can be powered by turbine generator 30. Fluid can be pumped into blender module 40 through an inlet manifold 48a by first electric motor 43a and added to tub 46a. Thus, first electric motor 43a acts as a suction motor. Second electric motor 41a can drive the centrifugal blending process in tub 46a. Second electric motor 41a can also drive the delivery of blended fluid out of blender module 40 and to the wellbore via an outlet manifold 49a. Thus, second electric motor 41a acts as a tub motor and a discharge motor. In certain illustrative embodiments, a third electric motor 42a can also be provided. Third electric motor 42a can also be powered by turbine generator 30, and can power delivery of fluid additives to blender 46a. For example, proppant from a hopper 44a can be delivered to a blender tub 46a, for example, a centrifugal blender tub, by an auger 45a, which is powered by third electric motor 42a.
Similarly, in certain illustrative embodiments, second blender unit 47b can have a plurality of electric motors including a first electric motor 43b and a second electric motor 41b that are used to drive various components of blender module 40. Electric motors 41b and 43b can be powered by turbine generator 30. Fluid can be pumped into blender module 40 through an inlet manifold 48b by first electric motor 43b and added to tub 46b. Thus, second electric motor 43a acts as a suction motor. Second electric motor 41b can drive the centrifugal blending process in tub 46b. Second electric motor 41b can also drive the delivery of blended fluid out of blender module 40 and to the wellbore via an outlet manifold 49b. Thus, second electric motor 41b acts as a tub motor and a discharge motor. In certain illustrative embodiments, a third electric motor 42b can also be provided. Third electric motor 42b can also be powered by turbine generator 30, and can power delivery of fluid additives to blender 46b. For example, proppant from a hopper 44b can be delivered to a blender tub 46b, for example, a centrifugal blender tub, by an auger 45b, which is powered by third electric motor 42b.
Blender module 40 can also include a control cabin 53 for housing equipment controls for first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b, and can further include appropriate drives and coolers as required.
Conventional blenders powered by a diesel hydraulic system are typically housed on a forty-five foot tractor trailer and are capable of approximately 100 bbl/min. In contrast, the dual configuration of blender module 40 having first blender unit 47a and second blender unit 47b can provide a total output capability of 240 bbl/min in the same physical footprint as a conventional blender, without the need for a separate backup unit in case of failure.
Redundant system blenders have been tried in the past with limited success, mostly due to problems with balancing weights of the trailers while still delivering the appropriate amount of power. Typically, two separate engines, each approximately 650 hp, have been mounted side by side on the nose of the trailer. In order to run all of the necessary systems, each engine must drive a mixing tub via a transmission, drop box and extended drive shaft. A large hydraulic system is also fitted to each engine to run all auxiliary systems such as chemical additions and suction pumps. Parasitic power losses are very large and the hosing and wiring is complex.
In contrast, the electric powered blender module 40 described in certain illustrative embodiments herein can relieve the parasitic power losses of conventional systems by direct driving each piece of critical equipment with a dedicated electric motor. Further, the electric powered blender module 40 described in certain illustrative embodiments herein allows for plumbing routes that are unavailable in conventional applications. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the fluid source can be an inlet manifold 48 that can have one or more inlet crossing lines 50 (see
In certain illustrative embodiments, blender module 40 can be scaled down or “downsized” to a single, compact module comparable in size and dimensions to fracturing module 20 described herein. For smaller fracturing or treatment jobs requiring fewer than four fracturing modules 20, a downsized blender module 40 can replace one of the fracturing modules 20 on trailer 10, thus reducing operational costs and improving transportability of the system.
Control System
A control system can be provided for regulating various equipment and systems within the electric powered fractioning operation. For example, in certain illustrative embodiments, the control system can regulate fracturing module 20 in delivery of treatment fluid from blender module 40 to pumps 22 for delivery to the wellbore. Controls for the electric-powered operation described herein are a significant improvement over that of conventional diesel powered systems. Because electric motors are controlled by variable frequency drives 63, absolute control of all equipment on location can be maintained from one central point. When the system operator sets a maximum pressure for the treatment, the control software and variable frequency drives 63 calculate a maximum current available to the motors. Variable frequency drives 63 essentially “tell” the motors what they are allowed to do.
Electric motors controlled via variable frequency drive 63 are far safer and easier to control than conventional diesel powered equipment. For example, conventional fleets with diesel powered pumps utilize an electronically controlled transmission and engine on the unit. There can be up to fourteen different parameters that need to be monitored and controlled for proper operation. These signals are typically sent via hardwired cable to an operator console controlled by the pump driver. The signals are converted from digital to analog so the inputs can be made via switches and control knobs. The inputs are then converted from analog back to digital and sent back to the unit. The control module on the unit then tells the engine or transmission to perform the required task and the signal is converted to a mechanical operation. This process takes time.
Suitable controls and computer monitoring for the entire fracturing operation can take place at a single central location, which facilitates adherence to pre-set safety parameters. For example, a control center 60 is indicated in
Table 1, shown below, compares and contrasts the operational costs and manpower requirements for a conventional diesel powered operation (such as shown in
In Table 1, the “Diesel Powered Operation” utilizes at least 24 pumps and 2 blenders, and requires at least 54,000 hp to execute the fracturing program on that location. Each pump burns approximately 300-400 liters per hour of operation, and the blender units burn a comparable amount of diesel fuel. Because of the fuel consumption and fuel capacity of this conventional unit, it requires refueling during operation, which is extremely dangerous and presents a fire hazard. Further, each piece of conventional equipment needs a dedicated tractor to move it and a driver/operator to run it. The crew size required to operate and maintain a conventional operation such as the one in
In contrast, the electric powered operation as described herein utilizes a turbine that only consumes about 6 mm scf of natural gas per 24 hours. At current market rates (approximately $2.50 per mmbtu), this equates to a reduction in direct cost to the site operator of over $77,000 per day compared to the diesel powered operation. Also, the service interval on electric motors is about 50,000 hours, which allows the majority of reliability and maintainability costs to disappear. Further, the need for multiple drivers/operators is reduced significantly, and electric powered operation means that a single operator can run the entire system from a central location. Crew size can be reduced by around 75%, as only about 10 people are needed on the same location to accomplish the same tasks as conventional operations, with the 10 people including off-site personnel maintenance personnel. Further, crew size does not change with the amount of equipment used. Thus, the electric powered operation is significantly more economical.
As discussed above, the modular nature of the electric powered fracturing operation described herein provides significant operational advantages and efficiencies over traditional fracturing systems. Each fracturing module 20 sits on trailer 10 which houses the necessary mounts and manifold systems for low pressure suctions and high pressure discharges. Each fracturing module 20 can be removed from service and replaced without shutting down or compromising the fractioning spread. For instance, pump 22 can be isolated from trailer 10, removed and replaced by a new pump 22 in just a few minutes. If fracturing module 20 requires service, it can be isolated from the fluid lines, unplugged, un-pinned and removed by a forklift. Another fracturing module 20 can be then re-inserted in the same fashion, realizing a drastic time savings. In addition, the removed fracturing module 20 can be repaired or serviced in the field. In contrast, if one of the pumps in a conventional diesel powered system goes down or requires service, the tractor/trailer combination needs to be disconnected from the manifold system and driven out of the location. A replacement unit must then be backed into the line and reconnected. Maneuvering these units in these tight confines is difficult and dangerous.
The presently described electric powered fracturing operation can be easily adapted to accommodate additional types of pumping capabilities as needed. For example, a replacement pumping module can be provided that is adapted for removable mounting on trailer 10. Replacement pumping module can be utilized for pumping liquid nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or other chemicals or fluids as needed, to increase the versatility of the system and broaden operational range and capacity. In a conventional system, if a nitrogen pump is required, a separate unit truck/trailer unit must be brought to the site and tied into the fractioning spread. In contrast, the presently described operation allows for a replacement nitrogen module with generally the same dimensions as fractioning module 20, so that the replacement module can fit into the same slot on the trailer as fractioning module 20 would. Trailer 10 can contain all the necessary electrical power distributions as required for a nitrogen pump module so no modifications are required. The same concept would apply to carbon dioxide pump modules or any other pieces of equipment that would be required. Instead of another truck/trailer, a specialized replacement module can instead be utilized.
Natural gas is considered to be the cleanest, most efficient fuel source available. By designing and constructing “fit for purpose equipment” that is powered by natural gas, it is expected that the fracturing footprint, manpower, and maintenance requirements can each be reduced by over 60% when compared with traditional diesel-powered operations.
In addition, the presently described electric powered fracturing operation resolves or mitigates environmental impacts of traditional diesel-powered operations. For example, the presently described natural gas powered operation can provide a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions as compared to diesel-powered operations. In an illustrative embodiment, a fractioning site utilizing the presently described natural gas powered operation would have a carbon dioxide emissions level of about 2200 kg/hr, depending upon the quality of the fuel gas, which represents an approximately 200% reduction from carbon dioxide emissions of diesel-powered operations. Also, in an illustrative embodiment, the presently described natural gas powered operation would produces no greater than about 80 decibels of sound with a silencer package utilized on turbine 30, which meets OSHA requirements for noise emissions. By comparison, a conventional diesel-powered fractioning pump running at full rpm emits about 105 decibels of sound. When multiple diesel-powered fractioning pumps are running simultaneously, noise is a significant hazard associated with conventional operations.
In certain illustrative embodiments, the electric-powered fractioning operation described herein can also be utilized for offshore oil and gas applications, for example, fracturing of a wellbore at an offshore site. Conventional offshore operations already possess the capacity to generate electric power on-site. These vessels are typically diesel over electric, which means that the diesel powerplant on the vessel generates electricity to meet all power requirements including propulsion. Conversion of offshore pumping services to run from an electrical power supply will allow transported diesel fuel to be used in power generation rather than to drive the fracturing operation, thus reducing diesel fuel consumption. The electric power generated from the offshore vessel's power plant (which is not needed during station keeping) can be utilized to power one or more fracturing modules 10. This is far cleaner, safer and more efficient than using diesel powered equipment. Fracturing modules 10 are also smaller and lighter than the equipment typically used on the deck of offshore vessels, thus removing some of the current ballast issues and allowing more equipment or raw materials to be transported by the offshore vessels.
In a deck layout for a conventional offshore stimulation vessel, skid based, diesel powered pumping equipment and storage facilities on the deck of the vessel create ballast issues. Too much heavy equipment on the deck of the vessel causes the vessel to have higher center of gravity. Also, fuel lines must be run to each piece of equipment greatly increasing the risk of fuel spills. In illustrative embodiments of a deck layout for an offshore vessel utilizing electric-powered fractioning operations as described herein, the physical footprint of the equipment layout is reduced significantly when compared to the conventional layout. More free space is available on deck, and the weight of equipment is dramatically decreased, thus eliminating most of the ballast issues. A vessel already designed as diesel-electric can be utilized. When the vessel is on station at a platform and in station keeping mode, the vast majority of the power that the ship's engines are generating can be run up to the deck to power modules. The storage facilities on the vessel can be placed below deck, further lowering the center of gravity, while additional equipment, for instance, a 3-phase separator, or coiled tubing unit, can be provided on deck, which is difficult in existing diesel-powered vessels. These benefits, coupled with the electronic control system, give a far greater advantage over conventional vessels.
While the present description has specifically contemplated a fracturing system, the system can be used to power pumps for other purposes, or to power other oilfield equipment. For example, high rate and pressure pumping equipment, hydraulic fracturing equipment, well stimulation pumping equipment and/or well servicing equipment could also be powered using the present system. In addition, the system can be adapted for use in other art fields requiring high torque or high rate pumping operations, such as pipeline cleaning or dewatering mines.
It is to be understood that the subject matter herein is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials, or illustrative embodiments shown and described, as modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. Accordingly, the subject matter is therefore to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 16/933,939 filed Jul. 20, 2020 which is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 15/086,829 filed Mar. 31, 2016 which is a continuation of U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 13/441,334 filed Apr. 6, 2012 and granted as U.S. Pat. No. 9,366,114 on Jun. 14, 2016 which claims the benefit, and priority benefit, of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/472,861 filed Apr. 7, 2011, titled “MOBILE, MODULAR, ELECTRICALLY POWERED SYSTEM FOR USE IN FRACTURING UNDERGROUND FORMATIONS,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1740587 | Greenfield | Dec 1929 | A |
1753050 | Hughes | Apr 1930 | A |
1869859 | Morrow | Aug 1932 | A |
1907721 | Booth et al. | May 1933 | A |
2272169 | Granberg | Feb 1942 | A |
2484321 | Stubau | Oct 1949 | A |
2554228 | Walker et al. | May 1951 | A |
2814254 | Litzenberg | Nov 1957 | A |
2824434 | Stern | Feb 1958 | A |
3113620 | Hemminger | Dec 1963 | A |
3113621 | Krueger et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3147144 | Wilhelm | Sep 1964 | A |
3187958 | Swart | Jun 1965 | A |
3525404 | Kelly | Aug 1970 | A |
3533605 | Futty et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3722595 | Kiel | Mar 1973 | A |
3764233 | Strickland | Oct 1973 | A |
3773438 | Hall et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3782695 | Sandiford | Jan 1974 | A |
3791682 | Mitchell | Feb 1974 | A |
3801229 | Henderson | Apr 1974 | A |
3837179 | Barth | Sep 1974 | A |
3842910 | Zingg et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3893655 | Sandiford | Jul 1975 | A |
3901313 | Doniguian | Aug 1975 | A |
4060988 | Arnold | Dec 1977 | A |
4100822 | Rosman | Jul 1978 | A |
4159180 | Cooper | Jun 1979 | A |
4272224 | Kabele | Jun 1981 | A |
4311395 | Douthitt | Jan 1982 | A |
4341508 | Rambin, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
4460276 | Arribau | Jul 1984 | A |
4471619 | Nolley, Jr. | Sep 1984 | A |
4526633 | Lawrence et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4538221 | Crain | Aug 1985 | A |
4538222 | Crain | Aug 1985 | A |
4557325 | Gall | Dec 1985 | A |
4694907 | Stahl et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4779186 | Handke | Oct 1988 | A |
4840292 | Harvey | Jun 1989 | A |
4850702 | Arribau et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850750 | Cogbill | Jul 1989 | A |
4854714 | Davis | Aug 1989 | A |
4916631 | Crain | Apr 1990 | A |
5095221 | Tyler | Mar 1992 | A |
5184456 | Rumford et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5247991 | Polcer | Sep 1993 | A |
5248005 | Mochizuki | Sep 1993 | A |
5334898 | Skybyk | Aug 1994 | A |
5441340 | Cedillo | Aug 1995 | A |
5445223 | Nelson | Aug 1995 | A |
5512811 | Latos | Apr 1996 | A |
5517822 | Haws et al. | May 1996 | A |
5582250 | Constien | Dec 1996 | A |
5611732 | Tirumalai | Mar 1997 | A |
5778657 | Ohtomo et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5899272 | Loree | May 1999 | A |
5907970 | Havlovick et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5975206 | Woo | Nov 1999 | A |
6007227 | Carlson | Dec 1999 | A |
6024170 | McCabe | Feb 2000 | A |
6056521 | Leu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6059539 | Nyilas et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060436 | Snyder | May 2000 | A |
6120175 | Tewell | Sep 2000 | A |
6142878 | Barin | Nov 2000 | A |
6161386 | Lokhandwala | Dec 2000 | A |
6167965 | Bearden et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193402 | Grimland | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6265786 | Bosley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286986 | Grimland | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6298652 | Mittricker et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306800 | Samuel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325142 | Bosley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334746 | Nguyen | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6398521 | Yorulmazoglu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6495929 | Bosley et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6644844 | Neal et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6765304 | Baten et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6773238 | Sprakel | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6907737 | Mittricker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6979116 | Cecala et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7114322 | Yamanaka et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128142 | Heathman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7562708 | Cogliandro et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563076 | Brunet et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7581379 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7589379 | Amaratunga et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608935 | Scherzer | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669657 | Symington et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7677316 | Butler et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681647 | Mudunuri et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683499 | Saucier | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7717193 | Egilsson et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7819181 | Entov et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819209 | Bezner | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7828057 | Kearl et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7832257 | Weightman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836949 | Dykstra | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841394 | McNeel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845413 | Shampine et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7908230 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7921914 | Bruins | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7926562 | Poitzsch et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7958716 | Zeigenfuss | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8025099 | Mesher | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8056635 | Shampine et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083504 | Williams | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8171993 | Hefley | May 2012 | B2 |
8253298 | Saban et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8474521 | Kajaria et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8632320 | Palomba et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8789591 | Smith | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8882336 | Wolford | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8899823 | Oldham | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8936097 | Heijnen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8951130 | Neufelder et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8997904 | Cryer et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9068506 | Eleftheriou et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9103193 | Coli | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9121257 | Coli | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9316216 | Cook et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9322595 | Shinn | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9366114 | Coli | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9395049 | Vicknair | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9410410 | Broussard et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9435175 | Chong et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9452394 | Weinstein et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9534473 | Morris et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9556721 | Jang et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9562420 | Morris et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9611728 | Oehring | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9650879 | Broussard et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9829002 | Crom | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9945365 | Hernandez | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9995218 | Oehring et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10030579 | Austin et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10076733 | Morris et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10107084 | Coli | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10107085 | Coli | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10167863 | Cook et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10221668 | Coli | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10227855 | Coli | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10374485 | Morris et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10378326 | Morris et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10385669 | Hodgson et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10415332 | Morris et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10502042 | Coli | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10518229 | Morris et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10519730 | Morris et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10544753 | Filippone | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10563490 | Ladron de Guevara Rangel | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10648312 | Coli | May 2020 | B2 |
10689961 | Coli | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10718194 | Coli | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10718195 | Coli et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10724353 | Coli et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10724515 | Cook et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
10774630 | Coli et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10794165 | Fischer et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10837270 | Coli | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10851634 | Coli | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10876386 | Coli | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10895138 | Coli | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10962305 | Morris | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10982521 | Coli et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11002125 | Coli | May 2021 | B2 |
11070109 | Morris | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11073242 | Morris | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11118438 | Coli | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11187069 | Coli | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11255173 | Coli | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11359462 | Morris et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11391133 | Coli | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11391136 | Coli | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11434763 | Morris et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
20010000996 | Grimland et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010052704 | Bosley et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002101 | Hayashi | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030057704 | Baten et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030079479 | Kristich et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030161212 | Neal | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030178195 | Agee et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040008571 | Coody | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011523 | Sarada | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040042335 | Cecala et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040104577 | Alger et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141412 | Midas et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040179961 | Pugnet et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188360 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219040 | Kugelev et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050017723 | Entov et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050029476 | Biester | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050103286 | Ji | May 2005 | A1 |
20050196298 | Manning | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248334 | Dagenias et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060042259 | Marushima et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060054318 | Sarada | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060381 | Heathman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065400 | Smith | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080971 | Smith | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060175064 | Yuratich | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060225402 | Kierspe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060228233 | Cook | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254281 | Badeer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260331 | Andreychuk | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278394 | Stover | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070029090 | Andreychuk et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070099746 | Hahlbeck | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125544 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132243 | Wurtele et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070201305 | Heilman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203991 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204991 | Loree et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070256424 | Briesch et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070256830 | Entov et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070277982 | Shampine et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080006089 | Adnan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080017369 | Sarada | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029267 | Shampine et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080044298 | Laski | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048456 | Browning et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080064569 | Baxter et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066911 | Luharuka et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080203734 | Grimes et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080217024 | Moore | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236818 | Dykstra | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264625 | Ochoa | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264640 | Eslinger | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264641 | Slabaugh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264649 | Crawford | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267785 | Cervenka et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090068031 | Gambier et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084558 | Bloom | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090090504 | Weightman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090092510 | Williams | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093317 | Kajiwara et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090095482 | Surjaatmadja | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101410 | Egilsson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120635 | Neal | May 2009 | A1 |
20090145660 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090194280 | Gil et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090308602 | Bruins et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000221 | Pfefferle | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100032663 | Bulovic et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038077 | Heilman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038907 | Hunt et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100048429 | Dobson, Jr. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051272 | Loree | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100068071 | Bowden | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071561 | Marwitz et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100071899 | Coquilleau et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089126 | Sweeney | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089589 | Crawford et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100132949 | DeFosse et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100310384 | Stephenson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326663 | Bobier et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329072 | Hagan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110024129 | Turakhia | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110030951 | Irvine et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110036584 | Weightman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110067882 | Yeriazarian et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067885 | Shampine et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073599 | Nieves | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110085924 | Shampine et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110175579 | Mazumdar | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110179799 | Allam et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185702 | Bilton et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110198089 | Panga et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206537 | Simpson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110236225 | Leugemors et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110247334 | Alexander | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110272158 | Neal | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286858 | England et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110303323 | Ding et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120006550 | Shampine et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120067568 | Palmer et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085541 | Love et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120181015 | Kajaria et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120223524 | Williams | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120255734 | Coli et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120312531 | Eslinger | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130045117 | Wishart | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130098619 | Shampine et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130150268 | Oldham | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130161016 | Loree et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130306322 | Sanborn et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140000899 | Nevison | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140010671 | Cryer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027386 | Munisteri | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039708 | Curtis et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140048253 | Andreychuck | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140060774 | Motakef et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140069651 | Shampine et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140102127 | Yum et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140124208 | Loree et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140147291 | Burnette | May 2014 | A1 |
20140205475 | Dale | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140219824 | Burnette | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140238683 | Korach et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140251623 | Lestz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140255214 | Burnette | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140262292 | Joseph et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150036453 | Wolford | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150068724 | Coli | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150068754 | Coli | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083235 | Larson | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150114652 | Lestz et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129082 | Murphy et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150162427 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150204173 | Shampine et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150240996 | Kapoor | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150300291 | Yamanaka et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160061061 | Ekanayake et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160102612 | Kaufman | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160175793 | Granados | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160177675 | Morris | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160177678 | Morris et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160208593 | Coli | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160208594 | Coli | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160248230 | Tawy et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160258267 | Payne et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160273328 | Oehring | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160326854 | Broussaed | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160326855 | Coli | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160348479 | Oehring et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160369609 | Morris | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170016433 | Chong et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170036178 | Coli | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170037718 | Coli | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170104389 | Morris | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170129338 | Cryer et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170145918 | Oehring et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170218727 | Oehring et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170218843 | Oehring et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170222409 | Oehring et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170259227 | Morris | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170284484 | Bickmann, III et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170302135 | Cory | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170322086 | Luharuka et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180007173 | Wang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180044307 | Sathe et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180075034 | Wang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180080377 | Austin et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180156210 | Oehring et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180202356 | Godman | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180299878 | Cella et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180339278 | Morris et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180363434 | Coli | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363435 | Coli | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363436 | Coli | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363437 | Coli | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363438 | Coli | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180374607 | Hernandez Marti et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190003272 | Morris et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190003329 | Morris et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190055827 | Coli | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190063341 | Davis | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190112908 | Coli | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190120024 | Oehring et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190169971 | Oehring et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190203572 | Morris et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190204021 | Morris et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190211661 | Reckels et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190271218 | Coli | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190277125 | Coli | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190277126 | Coli | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190277127 | Coli | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190277128 | Coli | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190353303 | Morris et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190356199 | Morris et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200040705 | Morris et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200040762 | Boyce et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200040878 | Morris | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200087997 | Morris et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200109616 | Oehring et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200109617 | Oehring et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200208565 | Morris | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200318467 | Coli | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200347710 | Coli | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200347711 | Coli | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200347725 | Morris et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210025324 | Morris et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210025383 | Bodishbaugh et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210062631 | Coli | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210102531 | Bodishbaugh et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210140295 | Coli | May 2021 | A1 |
20210215440 | Morris | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210363869 | Coli | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20220056794 | Coli | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220056795 | Coli | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220356792 | Coli | Nov 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103159 | Nov 2017 | AR |
103160 | Nov 2017 | AR |
087298 | Dec 2017 | AR |
092923 | Dec 2017 | AR |
104823 | Dec 2017 | AR |
104824 | Dec 2017 | AR |
104825 | Dec 2017 | AR |
104826 | Dec 2017 | AR |
2015364678 | Mar 2019 | AU |
2017229475 | May 2020 | AU |
2019200899 | Sep 2020 | AU |
2279320 | Apr 2000 | CA |
2547970 | Dec 2006 | CA |
2514658 | Mar 2007 | CA |
2653069 | Dec 2007 | CA |
2678638 | Nov 2008 | CA |
2684598 | Feb 2009 | CA |
2639418 | Mar 2009 | CA |
2700385 | Apr 2009 | CA |
2679812 | Mar 2010 | CA |
2955706 | Oct 2012 | CA |
2773843 | Jan 2016 | CA |
2835904 | Feb 2017 | CA |
2845347 | May 2018 | CA |
2900387 | Sep 2018 | CA |
2970542 | Sep 2018 | CA |
2970527 | Aug 2019 | CA |
201461291 | May 2010 | CN |
102171060 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102602323 | Jul 2012 | CN |
103016362 | Apr 2013 | CN |
102602322 | Apr 2014 | CN |
107208557 | Sep 2017 | CN |
207194878 | Apr 2018 | CN |
105937557 | Jul 2018 | CN |
ZL201580074219.9 | Sep 2019 | CN |
110513155 | Nov 2019 | CN |
19707654 | Aug 1998 | DE |
1574714 | Sep 2005 | EP |
2904200 | Aug 2015 | EP |
3025019 | Feb 2018 | EP |
3444431 | Feb 2019 | EP |
3447239 | Feb 2019 | EP |
2726705 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3444430 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3444432 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3453827 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3456915 | Mar 2019 | EP |
3234321 | Feb 2020 | EP |
3719281 | Oct 2020 | EP |
3426888 | Apr 2021 | EP |
976279 | Nov 1964 | GB |
2351125 | Dec 2000 | GB |
2404253 | Jan 2005 | GB |
6415748 | Oct 2018 | JP |
10-1948225 | Feb 2019 | KR |
10-1981198 | May 2019 | KR |
358054 | Aug 2018 | MX |
362628 | Jan 2019 | MX |
8103143 | Nov 1981 | WO |
2001094786 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2007011812 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007096660 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007098606 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007141715 | Dec 2007 | WO |
2008117048 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2009070876 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2010141232 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011070244 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2012137068 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013170375 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014053056 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014102127 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2018044307 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2018071738 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018075034 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018204293 | Nov 2018 | WO |
2021021664 | Feb 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
TB Wood's Altra Industrial Motion; Flexible Couplings; May 2021; 104 pages. |
Wadman, Bruce W.; 2000 HP Gas Turbine Fracturing Rig; Diesel and Gas Turbine Process; XP008074468; Aug. 1966; pp. 36-37. |
Grynning, Audun et al.; Tyrihans Raw Seawater Injection; Offshore Technology conference; 2009; 18 pages. |
Overli, Jan M. et al.; A Survey of Platform Machinery in the North Sea; The American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1992; 10 pages. |
Frei, Arno et al.; Design of Pump Shaft Trains Having Variable-Speed Electric Motors; Proceedings of the Third International Pump Symposium; pp. 33-44; 1986. |
TB Wood's Dura-Flex Couplings for Mobile Hydraulic Fracturing Pump System; May 20, 2013; 5 pages; https://www.tbwoods.com/newsroom/2013/05/Dura-Flex-Couplings-for-Mobile-Hydraulic-Fracturing-Pump-System. |
ENG Tips; Finding Motor with Two Shaft Ends and Two Flanges; Oct. 20, 2012; 2 pages; https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=332087. |
European Patent Office; Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 13843467.5; Jul. 13, 2021, 13 pages; Europe. |
Argentinian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection with P180100424; dated Dec. 21, 2021; 5 pages; Argentina. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC; dated Oct. 7, 2021; 4 pages; Europe. |
Brazilian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR112013025880-2; dated Nov. 18, 2021; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Schlumberger; JET Manual 23: Fracturing Pump Units, SPF/SPS-343; Version 1.0; Jan. 31, 2007; 68 pages. |
Mexican Institute of Industrial Property; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/000776; dated Feb. 16, 2022; 4 pages; Mexico. |
Mexican Institute of Industrial Property; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/009488; dated Jun. 23, 2022; 4 pages; Mexico. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025435-1; dated Apr. 28, 2022; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025423-8; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025434-3; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 16 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025416-5; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025438-6; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 21 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025438-6; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025428-9; dated Apr. 28, 2022; 17 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025428-9; dated Aug. 31, 2022; 13 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025420-3; dated Apr. 27, 2022; 15 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025420-3; dated Aug. 31, 2022; 13 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025441-6; dated Apr. 29, 2022; 15 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025441-6; dated Sep. 30, 2022; 13 pages; Brazil. |
European Patent Office; Brief Communication, issued in connection to application No. 13843467.5; dated Feb. 10, 2022, 11 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Decision to Refuse a European Patent Application, issued in connection to application No. 13843467.5; dated Mar. 31, 2022, 21 pages; Europe. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025337-1; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025337-1; dated Jul. 11, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025361-4; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025361-4; dated Jul. 11, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025350-9; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025342-8; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025357-6; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025369-0; dated Jul. 11, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025369-0; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
Ministry of Economy, National Insitute of Industrial Propert; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR122020025374-6; dated Mar. 9, 2022; 6 pages; Brazil. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC; dated Jun. 2, 2022; 3 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC; dated Jul. 21, 2022; 4 pages; Europe. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection with application No. 3112566; dated May 24, 2022; 9 pages; Canada. |
Notice of Related Applications; filed in connection to U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,553; dated May 22, 2019; 7 pages; US. |
The International Bureau of WIPO; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued in connection to PCT/CA2013/000845; dated Apr. 7, 2015; 8 pages; Canada. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT counterpart Application No. PCT/IB2012/000832 dated Sep. 13, 2012, 12 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/IB2012/000832 dated Sep. 13, 2012, 12 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT counterpart Application No. PCT/CA2013/000845 dated Jan. 8, 2014, 12 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/CA2013/000845 dated Jan. 8, 2014, 12 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US15/66133 dated Mar. 2, 2016, 10 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US15/66114 dated May 25, 2016, 8 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US16/49777 dated Nov. 21, 2016, 10 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion filed in PCT Application No. PCT/US17/21181 dated May 25, 2017, 10 pages. |
Int'l Search Report filed in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/039982 dated Sep. 11, 2018, 8 pages. |
Int'l Search Report filed in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/039976 dated Nov. 5, 2018, 12 pages. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion issued copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2018/068103 dated May 7, 2019, 11 pages. |
Int'l Search Report & Written Opinion received in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US19/32645, dated Jul. 15, 2019, 10 pages. |
Int'l Search Report received in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/043982 dated Oct. 9, 2019, 8 pages. |
Int'l Search Report received in copending PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/043303 dated Nov. 12, 2019, 13 pages. |
PCT/US2019/66907 Int'l Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Authority dated Mar. 25, 2020, 12 pages. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/030306 dated Jul. 28, 2020, 14 pages. |
Int'l Search Report dated Oct. 8, 2020, issued in the prosecution of patent application PCT/US20/43583, 19 pages. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/055592; dated Jan. 21, 2021: pp. 1-15. |
Argentinian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection with P180100416; dated Nov. 4, 2019; 5 pages; Argentina. |
National Institute of the Industrial Property of Argentina, Second Office Action, issued in connection to application No. 20160102674; dated Feb. 2, 2021; 4 pages; Argentina. |
Industrial Property Review of Brazil, Office Action, issued in connection with application No. BR112015007587-8; dated Feb. 18, 2020; 5 pages; Brazil. |
Foreign Communication from a related counterpart application; Canadian Application No. 2,835,904; Canadian Office Action; dated Jan. 19, 2015; 4 pages; Canada. |
Foreign Communication From a Related Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2,835,904 Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2015, 4 pages. |
Foreign Communication From a Related Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2,845,347 Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2015, 4 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2829422; dated Feb. 26, 2019; 5 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2829422; dated Feb. 26, 2019; 1 page; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2955706; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 3 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2955706; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 1 page; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2966672; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 3 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2966672; dated Dec. 18, 2018; 1 page; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Report, issued for CA2900387; dated Apr. 25, 2017; 4 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examination Search Report, issued for CA2900387; dated Apr. 17, 2017; 1 page; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to CA2955706; dated Jul. 12, 2019; 3 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to CA2955706; dated Mar. 4, 2020; 3 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner Report, issued in connection to application No. 3060766; dated Jan. 6, 2021; 4 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner Report, issued in connection to application No. 3087558; dated Aug. 31, 2020; 4 pages; Canada. |
European Patent Office, Supplemental Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2016 for Application No. EP12767292.1, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP13843467.5; dated Nov. 28, 2016; 8 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP12767292.1; dated Mar. 10, 2016; 8 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18188786.0; dated Feb. 14, 2019; 7 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189394.2; dated Nov. 19, 2018; 7 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189396.7; dated Feb. 8, 2019; 11 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189400.7; dated Nov. 19, 2018; 7 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18189402.3; dated Jan. 7, 2019; 7 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued for EP18194529.6; dated Dec. 19, 2018; 7 pages; Europe. |
EPO Search Report filed in EP counterpart Application No. 15870991.5 dated Oct. 15, 2018, 13 pages. |
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP13843467.5; dated Jun. 14, 2018; 7 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in conneciton to EP18189396.7; dated May 13, 2019; 10 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP18189396.7; dated Apr. 9, 2020; 3 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. EP18189402.3; dated Jul. 31, 2020; 4 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18189396.7; dated Dec. 11, 2020; 4 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18194529.6; dated Nov. 17, 2020; 4 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18189402.3; dated Feb. 24, 2021; 5 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communicaiton Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. 18189400.7; dated Apr. 8, 2021; 4 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to application No. EP18189400.7; dated Jul. 27, 2020; 4 pages; Europe. |
EPO Search Report received in copending EP Application No. 17763916 dated Oct. 16, 2019, 8 pages. |
Extended Search Report for European application No. 20156440.8 dated Sep. 3, 2020, 7 pages. |
Mexican Patent Office; Official Action, issued in connection to MX/a2018/000772; 1 page; Mexico. |
Mexican Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/000772; dated Jul. 20, 2020; 7 pages; Mexico. |
Mexican Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2019/001247; dated Jan. 12, 2021; 4 pages; Mexico. |
Mexican Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. MX/a/2018/000772; dated Mar. 18, 2021; 6 pages; Mexico. |
Gardner Denver, Inc., Outline-Bare Unit, Nov. 2011, 1 page, Tulsa, OK USA. |
C-2500 Quintuplex Intermittent Duty Performance Ratings Displacement at Pump RPM—Well Stimulation and Intermittent Application; Bulleting: WS: 08-02-0801: www.gardenerdenver.com; 2 pages; retrievd from: http://gardenerdenverpumps.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/1050-c-2500-quintuplex-well-service-pump.pdf on Dec. 7, 2018. |
Podsada, Janice. The Hartford Courant. “Pratt & Whitney Celebrates Completion of 50th FT8 MobilePac Power Generator.” Jul. 18, 2011. |
Powerpoint presentation: TM2500 & TM2500+ Mobile Gas Turbine Generator; retrieved Oct. 9, 2014 from www.scawa.com/files/SCA_TM2500.pdf. |
Toshiba G9/H9 Adjustable Speed Drive Engineering Specification: ASD Applications and Marketing. Feb. 13, 2008. |
Gardner Denver, Inc., GD-2500 Quintuplex Well Service Pump, 2003, 2 pages, USA. |
Gardner Denver, Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000 Quintuplex, Power End Parts List, 300FWF997 Rev G, Apr. 2007, 15 pages, Tulsa, OK USA. |
Gardner Denver Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000, GD0-25000-HD, Quintuplex Pumps; GWS Fluid End Parts List, 302FWF997 Rev H, Jul. 2008, 39 pages, Tulsa, OK USA. |
Gardner Denver, Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000 Quintuplex, Operating and Service Manual, 300FWF996 Revision F, Apr. 2011, 50 pages, Tulsa, OK USA. |
Gardner Denver, Inc., Well Servicing Pump, Model GD-25000, GD-25000-HD, Quintuplex Pumps, Standard Fluid End Parts List, 301 FWF997 Rev J, Jul. 2011, 40 pages, Tulsa, OK USA. |
“The Application of Flexible Couplings for Turbomachinery”, Robert E. Munyon, John R. Mancuso and C.B. Gibbons, Proceedings of the 18th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 1989, pp. 1-11. |
Frac Water Heater, www.alliedoilfield.com, Oct. 18, 2017, 3 pages. |
Frac Tank Heating, McAdaFluidsHeatingServices, mcadafluidsheating.comffrac-tank-heating, Oct. 18, 2017, 2 pages. |
Firestream Water Heaters for Fracking, www.heatec.com, Oct. 18, 2017, 4 pages. |
Kraken Tri-Fuel Superheater Technology, Aggreko, Oct. 18, 2017, 2 pages. |
Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary entry for “triplex pump”, accessed Apr. 9, 2021 via www.glossary.oilfield.com; 1 page. |
National Oilwell Varco; Reciprocating Plunger Pumps: Installation, Care and Operation Manual; Revised Sep. 2, 2010; 30 pages. |
MC Technologies; Operation and Maintenance Manual, Pump Assembly Operating Manual, Well Service Pump, Doc. No. OMM50003255, May 26, 2015, 98 pages. |
National Oilwell Varco; Installation, Care and Operation Manual; 29 pages; www.nov.com. |
Argentinian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection with P180100424; dated Jun. 16, 2021; 4 pages; Argentina. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to application No. 3081005; dated Jun. 7, 2021; 3 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to application No. 3081010; dated Jun. 8, 2021; 3 pages; Canada. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Examiner's Report, issued in connection to application No. 3080744; dated Jun. 7, 2021; 4 pages; Canada. |
European Patent Office; Extended European Search Report, issued in connection to application No. 21150745.4; dated May 20, 2020; 7 pages; Europe. |
Brazilian Patent Office; Office Action, issued in connection to application No. BR112013025880-2; dated May 19, 2021; 6 pages; Brazil. |
European Patent Office; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP18188786.0; dated Jul. 22, 2021; 3 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, issued in connection to EP18194529.6; dated Jul. 23, 2021; 3 pages; Europe. |
Brooksbank, David; Coupling Types for Different Applications; Altra Industrial Motion; Dec. 17, 2011;6 pages. |
Altra Industrial Motion; Altra Couplings offers the largest selection of Industrial couplings available from a single souce . . . worldwide; May 23, 2013; 1 page. |
Sulzer Pumps Finland Oy; MPP High Performance Multi-Phase Pump; Jun. 2004; 12 pages. |
Moore, Jesse C.; Electric Motors for Centrifugal Compressor Drives; General Electric Co.; Dec. 31, 1973; pp. 74-83. |
Grimstad, Haakon J. et al.; Subsea Multiphase Boosting—Maturing Technology Applied for Santos Ltd's Mutineer and Exeter Field; SPE88562; Oct. 18, 2004; 10 pages. |
Pettigrew, Dana et al.; Use of Untreated Subsurface Non-Potable Water for Frac Operations; SPE162102; Oct. 30, 2012; 13 pages. |
Wang, Renguang et al.; One Electric Motor System for Steering Hydraulic Pump and Braking Air Pump in HEV BuS; Mar. 15, 2012; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.; vols. 490-495; pp. 910-913. |
Dean, Alan; Taming Vibration Demonds with Flexible Couplings; Jun. 2005; World Pumps; pp. 44-47. |
Mancuso, Jon; And You Thought All Felxible Pumps Couplings Were the Same; Apr. 2004; World Pumps; pp. 25-29. |
Johnson, C.M. et al.; An Introduction to Flexible Couplings; Dec. 1996; World Pumps; pp. 38-43. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220356791 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61472861 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16933939 | Jul 2020 | US |
Child | 17868762 | US | |
Parent | 16423091 | May 2019 | US |
Child | 16933939 | US | |
Parent | 16110794 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16423091 | US | |
Parent | 15086829 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16110794 | US | |
Parent | 13441334 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 15086829 | US |