This disclosure relates generally to measuring devices, and more particularly, to a force transducer that utilizes a one-piece machined spring to provide two different spring rates and multiple sensors to measure the different rates.
In the prior art, two separate force transducers are used to measure two different force ranges. This requires separate mounting schemes for each transducer, which adds mechanical complexity and weight to the overall hardware scheme.
A dual rate force transducer includes a dual rate spring coupled between opposing members. One portion of the spring has a first spring rate, and another portion of the spring has a second spring rate. Multiple sensors are coupled to measure spring displacement. A mechanical stop is used to limit compression of the spring.
The described embodiment(s) may be more readily understood by referring to the accompanying drawings in which:
Like numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
The preferred embodiment described herein is a dual rate force transducer. A dual rate spring is provided by machining a single piece of material (such as stainless steel) to have two different tension specifications on either end of the spring, with a shared flange or platen between the spring portions. Another flange is affixed on the distal end of each spring portion. Multiple LVDTs are mounted with the spring to measure displacement. For example, in the preferred embodiment, the LVDT transformers are affixed to the center, shared flange, while the moveable cores (armatures) are affixed to either one of the end flanges. The signals from all LVDT's are coupled to a signal processing circuit where they are processed and used for detection and control schemes.
As illustrated schematically in
Mounted for operation inside the spring 30 are three linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs) 40, 41, and 42, as shown in
The construction of the strut portions 20L, 20R is also generally well known. Preferably, the struts are cylindrical in shape and machined from stainless steel or aluminum to have a diameter D1 of 0.750 inches. (All dimensions indicated in this disclosure are approximate.) The attachment portions 24 of the struts have a circular opening with diameter D2 of 0.2500 inches and are connected at one end of the sensor to a fixed position and at the other end of the sensor to the load of interest. The flange portions 22L, 22R are also made of stainless steel or aluminum with a diameter D3 of approximately 2.25 inches and are fixed to the struts by weldment, for example. The total length L1 of the sensor in the null position is 9.5 inches, with each of the strut portions having a length L2 measuring 3.00 inches and the spring portion having a length L3 measuring 3.50 inches.
A detailed illustration of the preferred embodiment of spring 30 is shown in
Generally, using well known design criteria, the spring is made up of beams that are offset from each other by 90°. The thickness of the beams is what gives the spring its spring rate by bending under a given load. The thickness of the beams is varied in order to produce different spring rates that are particular to any given application. The gaps or slots 34, 35, 36 and 37 between the beams are dictated by the thickness of the beam and the overall length of the spring. This type of force transducer would typically be used in a situation that requires two force ranges, one much larger than the other, that would typically require two separate transducers to achieve the range and accuracy requirements. Each spring can have its spring rate (the thickness of the beams) tailored to a single force range without affecting the range of the other spring. For a given force and number of cycles, each spring must be able to withstand the stresses without suffering a fatigue failure. With this in mind, the stops are utilized to make sure neither spring ever sees a force that is beyond its operating range.
While it is preferred that the spring and division flanges be machined from a single piece of stock, it is possible to machine two individual springs and then connect them, for example by welding or brazing, to a common division flange. Further, a single spring having dual rates could be machined without a central flange, and the flange could be added later, for example, by pins or welding.
In this preferred embodiment, a series of three slotted portions 34 are formed between beams in the spring FDR portion 30a of 30, each having a depth X3 of 2.2 inches and an inside radius of curvature R1 of 0.095 inches. The width W1 of slots 34 is 0.190 inches. Two smaller slotted portions 35 are formed in the FCE portion 30c of spring 30, each having the same depth X3 as slots 34, an inside radius R2 of 0.055 inches, and a width W2 of 0.070 inches. The edges of the slots 34, 35 should be broken inside and outside around a radius blend of 0.010 to 0.030 inches or 0.005 to 0.030 times 45 degrees plus or minus a 10 degree chamfer. Further, there should be no machine marks on any of the inside radii of the slots or on the outside surface of the spring.
A series of three gaps 36 and two gaps 37 are also formed in the spring 30. The first set of gaps 36 has the same width W1 as slots 34, and the second set of gaps 37 has the same width W2 as slots 35. The depth X4 of gaps 36, 37 is 1.950 inches. It can be seen that the slots 34, 35 and the gaps 36, 37 are interleaved openings that allow for a small degree of compression of the spring 30.
As shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
It is noted that foregoing description is a preferred embodiment, but dimensions and measurements are approximate. In general, a sensor constructed according to this description can be used to measure a full scale range of ±627 lbs, with a load limit of ±1450 lbs and an ultimate limit of ±2175 lbs. The spring rate for extension FCE is 1000±10% lbs/inch, and the spring rate for retraction FDR is 7000±10% lbs/inch.
The electrical specifications are given in Table I.
The performance specifications are given in Table II.
Although a specific embodiment has been described, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to this embodiment without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive. The proper scope of the invention is defined by the accompanying claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/707,322.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1436344 | Hickey | Nov 1922 | A |
2421222 | Schaevitz | May 1947 | A |
4142499 | Salzgeber | Mar 1979 | A |
4148469 | Geyer | Apr 1979 | A |
4186914 | Radwill et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4375243 | Doll | Mar 1983 | A |
4386386 | Akita | May 1983 | A |
4423793 | Caris | Jan 1984 | A |
4491027 | Yalof et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4500768 | Rossell | Feb 1985 | A |
4632198 | Uchimura | Dec 1986 | A |
4702150 | Kaji | Oct 1987 | A |
5029310 | Sakaida et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5072799 | Freeman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5190117 | Freeman et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5628477 | Caferro et al. | May 1997 | A |
5925832 | Bruns | Jul 1999 | A |
6708803 | Jensen | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6827401 | Marshall et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6871549 | Serra et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
20050023047 | Yoshikawa | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050057033 | Ante | Mar 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070034023 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60707322 | Aug 2005 | US |