Inkjet printing devices generally provide high-quality image printing solutions at reasonable cost. Inkjet printing devices print images by ejecting ink drops through a plurality of nozzles onto a print medium, such as a sheet of paper. Nozzles are typically arranged in one or more arrays, such that properly sequenced ejection of ink from the nozzles causes characters or other images to be printed on the print medium as the printhead and the print medium move relative to each other. In a specific example, a thermal inkjet (TIJ) printhead ejects drops from a nozzle by passing electrical current through a heating element to generate heat and vaporize a small portion of the fluid within a firing chamber. In another example, a piezoelectric inkjet (PIJ) printhead uses a piezoelectric material actuator to generate pressure pulses that force ink drops out of a nozzle.
Improving the image print quality from inkjet printing devices typically involves addressing one or more of several technical challenges that can reduce image print quality. For example, pigment settling, air accumulation, temperature variation and particle accumulation within printhead modules can contribute to reduced print quality and eventual printhead module failure. One method of addressing these challenges has been to recirculate ink within the ink delivery system and print modules. However, the cost and size of macro-recirculation systems designed for this purpose are typically only appropriate for high-end industrial printing systems. In addition, product architectures that attempt to address the cost issue with less complexity typically become associated with poor performance and reliability.
The present embodiments will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Throughout the drawings, identical reference numbers designate similar, but not necessarily identical, elements.
Overview of Problem and Solution
As noted above, there are a number of challenges associated with image print quality in inkjet printing devices. Print quality suffers, for example, when there is ink blockage and/or clogging in inkjet printheads, temperature variations across the printhead die, and so on. Causes for these difficulties include pigment settling, accumulations of air and particulates in the printhead, and inadequate control of temperature across the printhead die. Pigment settling, which can block ink flow and clog nozzles occurs when pigment particles settle or crash out of the ink vehicle (e.g., solvent) during periods of storage or non-use of a printhead module (a printhead module includes one or more printheads). Pigment-based inks are generally preferred in inkjet printing as they tend to be more efficient, durable and permanent than dye-based inks, and ink development in commercial and industrial applications continues in the direction of higher pigment or binder loading and larger particle size. Air accumulation in printheads causes air bubbles that can also block the flow of ink. When ink is exposed to air, such as during storage in an ink reservoir, additional air dissolves into the ink. The subsequent action of ejecting ink drops from the firing chamber of the printhead releases excess air from the ink which accumulates as air bubbles that can block ink flow. Particle accumulation in printheads can also obstruct the flow of ink. Contamination during manufacturing and shedding of particles from injection-molded plastic parts during operation can result in particle accumulation. Although printhead modules and ink delivery systems typically include filters, particle accumulation in printheads can reach levels that eventually block printhead nozzles, causing print quality issues and print module failure. Thermal differences across the surface of the printhead die, especially along the nozzle column, influence characteristics of ink drops ejected from nozzles, such as the drop weight, velocity and shape. For example, a higher die temperature results in a higher drop weight and drop velocity, while a lower die temperature results in a lower drop weight and velocity. Variations in the drop characteristics adversely impact print quality. Therefore, controlling temperature in printhead modules is an important factor in achieving higher print quality, especially as nozzle packing densities and firing repetition rates continue to increase. Macro-recirculation of ink through the printhead module (“printhead module”, “print module”, “printer module”, and the like, are used interchangeably throughout this document) addresses these problems and is an important component in competitive inkjet systems, but it has yet to be incorporated into an approach that supports low-cost products with minimal system requirements on printer ink delivery systems.
Common inkjet printing systems that feature macro-recirculation of ink enable this function through sophisticated off-module control systems (i.e., control systems that are not onboard the printhead module itself) that incorporate electromechanical functions together with pumps, regulators, and accumulators. Various features are included such as out-of-ink detection, heat exchangers, filtration systems, and pressure sensors for controlled feedback. The high system overhead for these functions is commonly considered appropriate given the high cost of PIJ printheads, which are often permanently installed and infrequently replaced. However, the cost and size of these systems is only appropriate for high-end industrial systems, and product architectures that attempt to address the cost issue with less complexity typically become associated with poor performance and reliability. Moreover, printhead modules that do not have onboard pressure control systems suffer from sensitivity during installation and must utilize extensive priming operations to achieve a robust level of image and print quality.
Embodiments of the present disclosure overcome disadvantages of prior macro-recirculation systems generally by using dual pressure regulators incorporated onboard a thermal or piezo inkjet (i.e., TIJ or PIJ) printhead module. Dual regulators control pressure in a replaceable printhead module which relaxes performance and component specifications on printer ink delivery systems and results in substantial benefits in quality, reliability, size and cost. Embodiments of the dual regulator printhead module enable a cost-effective macro-recirculation system that addresses various factors that contribute to print quality issues in inkjet printing systems such as pigment settling, air and particulate accumulation, and inadequate thermal control within printheads. For example, the macro-recirculation provides a continual refreshing of filtered ink into the module, which refreshes settled ink, reduces air and particulate levels near the printhead, heats ink (e.g., for TIJ printheads) or cools ink (e.g., for PIJ printheads), and generally improves print system reliability. These benefits are achieved in part through an input regulator in the printhead module that finely controls the inlet pressure of ink flowing to the printhead(s) and an output regulator that finely controls the outlet pressure of ink flowing from the printhead(s). A negative pressure differential maintained by the dual regulators between the input and output of the printhead induces a regular ink flow through the printhead. Ink flows from the outlet of the input regulator through ink passages in the die carrier manifold to the back of the printhead substrate, through a gap between the printhead substrate and die carrier, and then returns through ink passages in the manifold to the inlet of the output regulator. The flow path extending behind the printhead substrate can be used to modulate the ink flow rate by choosing an appropriate gap between the printhead substrate and the physical printhead die carrier. In addition, fluidic channels in the printhead itself provide micro-recirculation paths across the top side of the printhead die substrate.
In one example embodiment, a print module includes a printhead die, an input regulator to regulate input fluid pressure to the die, and an output regulator to regulate output fluid pressure from the die. In another embodiment, a method includes receiving fluid at the input regulator to a print module. A fluid pressure differential is created within the print module between the input regulator and an output regulator. The pressure differential induces fluid to flow from the input regulator through a printhead die and to an output regulator. Fluid is then drawn from the output regulator. In another embodiment, a printing system includes a print module having a printhead die, and an input regulator and output regulator to control ink pressure to and from the die. The system also includes an ink supply and a pressure delivery mechanism to deliver ink to the print module. A vacuum pump in the printing system draws ink from the print module, returning it to the ink supply.
Nozzles 116 are usually arranged in one or more columns such that properly sequenced ejection of ink from the nozzles causes characters, symbols, and/or other graphics or images to be printed upon print media 118 as inkjet printhead assembly 102 and print media 118 are moved relative to each other. A typical thermal inkjet (TIJ) printhead includes a nozzle layer arrayed with nozzles 116 and firing resistors formed on an integrated circuit chip/die positioned behind the nozzles. Each printhead 114 is operatively connected to printer controller 110 and ink supply 104. In operation, printer controller 110 selectively energizes the firing resistors to generate heat and vaporize small portions of fluid within firing chambers, forming vapor bubbles that eject drops of ink through nozzles on to the print media 118. In a piezoelectric (PIJ) printhead, a piezoelectric element is used to eject ink from a nozzle. In operation, printer controller 110 selectively energizes the piezoelectric elements located close to the nozzles, causing them to deform very rapidly and eject ink through the nozzles.
Ink supply 104, pump 105, and vacuum pump 111 generally form an ink delivery system (IDS) within printing system 100. The IDS (ink supply 104, pump 105, vacuum pump 111) and the printhead module 102 together, form a larger macro-recirculation system within the printing system 100 that continually circulates ink to and from the printhead module 102 to provide fresh filtered ink to the printheads 114 within the module. Ink flows to printheads 114 from ink supply 104 through chambers 103 in printhead module 102 and back again via vacuum pump 111. During printing, a portion of the ink supplied to printhead module 102 is consumed (i.e., ejected), and a lesser amount of ink is therefore recirculated back to the ink supply 104. In some embodiments, a single pump can be used to both supply and recirculate ink in the IDS. In such embodiments, therefore, a vacuum pump 111 may not be included.
Mounting assembly 106 positions printhead module 102 relative to media transport assembly 108, and media transport assembly 108 positions print media 118 relative to inkjet printhead module 102. Thus, a print zone 122 is defined adjacent to nozzles 116 in an area between printhead module 102 and print media 118. Printing system 100 may include a series of printhead modules 102 that are stationary and that span the width of the print media 118, or one or more modules that scan back and forth across the width of print media 118. In a scanning type printhead assembly, mounting assembly 106 includes a moveable carriage for moving printhead module(s) 102 relative to media transport assembly 108 to scan print media 118. In a stationary or non-scanning type printhead assembly, mounting assembly 106 fixes printhead module(s) 102 at a prescribed position relative to media transport assembly 108. Thus, media transport assembly 108 positions print media 118 relative to printhead module(s) 102.
Printer controller 110 typically includes a processor, firmware, and other printer electronics for communicating with and controlling inkjet printhead module 102, mounting assembly 106, and media transport assembly 108. Electronic controller 110 receives host data 124 from a host system, such as a computer, and includes memory for temporarily storing data 124. Typically, data 124 is sent to inkjet printing system 100 along an electronic, infrared, optical, or other information transfer path. Data 124 represents, for example, a document and/or file to be printed. As such, data 124 forms a print job for inkjet printing system 100 and includes one or more print job commands and/or command parameters. Using data 124, printer controller 110 controls inkjet printhead module 102 and printheads 114 to eject ink drops from nozzles 116. Thus, printer controller 110 defines a pattern of ejected ink drops which form characters, symbols, and/or other graphics or images on print media 118. The pattern of ejected ink drops is determined by the print job commands and/or command parameters from data 124.
Referring still to
In the macro-recirculation system 200 of
During operation, the dual regulators 202 and 204 act to control backpressure behind the printhead die substrate 206 roughly to a range represented by the two set points (i.e., −6 inches water column and −9 inches water column) since there are similar pressure drops through the manifold passages 212 on the inlet and outlet sides. From a non-operating state, the input regulator 202 is closed, the output regulator 204 is open, and the check valve 216 is closed. Thus, no ink flow is present and pressure behind the die 206 is at the set point of the input regulator 202 (i.e.,−6 inches water column). When the printer IDS 201 pump 105 is engaged, the pressure drops in the manifold 208 and flow initiates from the input regulator 202. The output regulator 204 valve is drawn closer to the valve seat, and the pressure is regulated in a linear region to the set point (i.e., −9 inches water column). Similarly, on the input regulator 202, pressure is regulated to its set point (i.e., −6 inches water column). Thus, a flow rate is created in the manifold 208 between the two regulators that is proportional to the difference in pressure set points and may be estimated analytically (e.g., using the Hagen-Poiseuille equation) based upon the geometry of the manifold passages 212 together with ink viscosity. Typical values for flow rate with water-based inks can range from below ten to above one thousand milliliters per minute. The design of flow passages including use of flow restrictors can be used to optimize flow rate to system requirements.
When printing starts after a recirculating flow has been established, the printhead 114 (die 206) generates displacement-driven ink flow from the nozzles 116 (i.e., as ink is ejected from ink nozzles 116), which decreases the pressure in the printhead ink slots 213 to below that of the manifold pressure. Adding this printing flow to the control volume represented by the existing inlet/outlet recirculating flow causes the input regulator 202 valve to open more and the output regulator 204 valve to close more, which reduces recirculating ink flow. The system can be designed to accommodate a range of printing flow rate and recirculating flow rate needs. This range can span the case where recirculation is completely stopped during periods of high printing to the other extreme where the recirculating flow is only slightly decreased. The trade-off between ink flow rates of printing and recirculation is proportional to the non-printing recirculation flow rate design point. If the non-printing recirculation flow rate is designed to be substantially below the maximum printing flow rate, recirculating flow will be decreased to the point of shutting off. If the non-printing recirculation flow rate is set substantially above the printing flow rate, flow will be decreased but remain at a relatively high level.
In addition to the design and control of regulators 202 and 204, another factor related to recirculation flow rates is the fluid interaction with the printhead itself, such as the interaction of the ink flowing through the gaps 215 (i.e., the back-of-die bypass). As shown in
As noted above, embodiments of a macro-recirculation system 200 having a dual regulator printhead module 102 can vary in complexity and versatility to manage multiple ink colors using one or multiple printhead dies 206.
In addition to the multiple dies 206 and fluid paths as just described, the embodiment in
In some regulator embodiments, an enhanced pressure control scheme can be implemented by the introduction of gas pressure as a control parameter outside the regulator chambers. In the description above, the assumption has been that the pressure outside the regulator chambers is ambient atmospheric pressure. However, the external regulator cavity can be pressurized to provide a purge function known as priming. Chamber pressure can be used to control the valve position of both input and output regulators, 202 and 204. For example, with the printer pump 105 on the outlet side of the output regulator 204 turned off, the input regulator 202 chamber can be pressurized to open the valve, which allows a priming function by forcing ink through the nozzles. In another example, with the printer pump 105 off, the pressure on the chambers for both the input and output regulators can be modulated such that ink is pumped from one regulator to the other in alternating directions to provide a degree of mixing in the manifold 208 that may be beneficial for pigment settling. In a third example, one or both regulators can be bypassed by pressurizing or evacuating the regulator chambers to completely open the valves. For the input regulator 202, a high positive pressure is applied, and for the output regulator 204, a high negative (near vacuum) pressure is applied. These pressure applications disengage the onboard print module 102 regulation functions and require the printer IDS 201 to perform the precise functions of pressure regulation, which is generally more difficult, but in some situations may be advantageous.
Method 800 begins at block 802 with receiving fluid at an input pressure regulator to a print module. The fluid (e.g., ink) is pumped at a positive pressure from an ink supply in a printer ink delivery system by a pump to the input regulator in the print module. The method 800 continues at block 804 with creating a fluid pressure differential within the print module between the input regulator and an output regulator. The input regulator has a negative backpressure setpoint (e.g., around negative six inches of water column) that is higher than a negative backpressure setpoint in the output regulator (e.g., around negative nine inches of water column) fluid pressure differential. The pressure differential is the difference between the two negative backpressure setpoints of the input and output regulators.
The method 800 continues at block 806 with flowing fluid from the input regulator through a printhead die and to an output regulator using the pressure differential. The pressure differential creates a pressure-driven flow which flows fluid from the outlet of input regulator to the inlet of output regulator. The flow of fluid from the input regulator to the output regulator can follow fluid paths including a bypass gap behind the printhead die and a micro-channel formed in a layer on top of the printhead die. At block 808 of method 800, fluid is drawn from the output regulator at a negative pressure and returned to the fluid supply in the printer IDS.
At block 810 of method 800, fluid is ejected from nozzles formed in a nozzle layer on top of the printhead die. The ejection of fluid creates a negative pressure in the printhead die, which at block 812 is compensated for by opening a valve more in the input regulator and closing a valve more in the output regulator.
The present application is a continuation application claiming priority under 35 USC § 120 from co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/652,531 filed on Jul. 18, 2017 which was a divisional patent application claiming priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/819,902 filed on Feb. 28, 2013 and which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,724,926, which was a 371 patent application claiming priority from PCT/US2010/053133 filed on Oct. 19, 2010, the full disclosures each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4403229 | Barteck | Sep 1983 | A |
5565900 | Cowger et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
6030074 | Barinaga | Feb 2000 | A |
6116727 | Hagiwara | Sep 2000 | A |
6428156 | Waller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464346 | Otis, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6652080 | Childs et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
9724926 | Keefe et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020080216 | Dowell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20070182792 | Akahane | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080055378 | Drury et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090091606 | Haines et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090219323 | Silverbrook | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244226 | Hoshino | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267976 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100073444 | Daisuke | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085396 | Yokota | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100201742 | Karppinen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101412322 | Apr 2009 | CN |
2050572 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2005342960 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-088564 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2009023289 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-233972 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2010-083021 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2011-110853 | Jun 2011 | JP |
WO-2009142889 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2009142889 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190001686 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13819902 | US | |
Child | 15652531 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15652531 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 16125745 | US |