The subject matter disclosed herein relates generally to rotary wing aircraft and, more particularly, to a dual rotor, rotary wing aircraft.
According to an embodiment, a main rotor blade assembly for a rotary wing aircraft is provided including a main rotor blade root region, a main rotor blade inboard region arranged outboard of said main rotor blade root region, a main rotor blade main region arranged outboard of said main rotor blade inboard region, and a main rotor blade tip region arranged outboard of said main rotor blade main region. At least one of chord, twist, sweep, airfoil shape, and thickness/chord of the main rotor blade assembly has been optimized to achieve balanced high speed forward flight and hover relative to both efficiency and high thrust capability.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments, the main rotor blade root region extends from about 0% R to 20% R, the main rotor blade inboard region extends from about 20% R to 40% R, the main rotor blade main region extends from about 40% R to 90% R, and the main rotor blade tip region extends from about 90% R to 100% R.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade tip region has a large negative twist angle extending between about −1° and −8°.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade main region has a twist angle extending between about 3° and about −1°.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the twist angle of a portion of the main rotor blade main region varies at a constant rate.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade inboard region has a twist angle extending between about −6° and about 3°.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the twist angle of the main rotor blade inboard region varies at a constant rate.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade root region has a constant twist angle.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade root region has a twist angle of about −6°.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments a portion of the main rotor blade root region adjacent the main rotor blade inboard region has a chord to radius ratio varying between about 0.04 and about 0.08.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade inboard region has a generally constant chord to radius ratio.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the chord to radius ratio of the main rotor blade inboard region is about 0.08.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade main region has a chord to radius ratio varying between about 0.05 and about 0.08.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade tip region has a chord to radius ratio varying between about 0.03 and about 0.05.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade assembly is configured for use in an aircraft having a counter-rotating, coaxial main rotor assembly.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments the main rotor blade tip region has an aft tip sweep of about 25°.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments a thickness to chord ratio of the rotor blade gradually decreases between the inboard region and the tip region from about 0.035 to about 0.01.
According to another embodiment, a rotary wing aircraft is provided including an airframe, an extending tail, and counter-rotating, coaxial main rotor assembly including an upper rotor assembly and a lower rotor assembly. At least one of the upper rotor assembly and the lower rotor assembly includes a main rotor blade. A translational thrust system includes a propeller positioned at the extending tail. The translational thrust system is configured to provide translational thrust to the airframe. The main rotor blade includes a root region, an inboard region, a main region, and a tip region. At least one of chord, twist, sweep, airfoil shape, and thickness/chord of the main rotor blade assembly has been optimized to achieve balanced high speed forward flight and hover relative to both efficiency and high thrust capability.
In addition to one or more of the features described above, or as an alternative, in further embodiments at least one of sweep, chord, twist, and thickness to chord ratio of the rotor blade is defined by Tables 1-5.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several FIGURES:
Any number of blades 36 may be used with the rotor assembly 18.
The translational thrust system 40 includes a propeller 42 connected to and driven by the engine 24 via the gearbox 26. The translational thrust system 40 may be mounted to the rear of the airframe 12 with a translational thrust axis, T, oriented substantially horizontal and parallel to the aircraft longitudinal axis, L, to provide thrust for high-speed flight. The translational thrust axis, T, corresponds to the axis of rotation of propeller 42. While shown in the context of a pusher-prop configuration, it is understood that the propeller 42 could also be more conventional puller prop or could be variably facing so as to provide yaw control in addition to or instead of translational thrust. It should be understood that any such system or other translational thrust systems may alternatively or additionally be utilized. Alternative translational thrust systems may include different propulsion forms, such as a jet engine.
Referring to
Shown in
Referring to
A portion of the drive system downstream of the MOB 26 includes a combined gearbox 90 (also referred to as a clutch). The combined gearbox 90 selectively operates as a clutch and a brake for operation of the translational thrust system 40 with the MOB 26. The combined gearbox 90 also operates to provide a rotor brake function for the main rotor assembly 18.
The combined gearbox 90 generally includes an input 92 and an output 94 generally defined along an axis parallel to rotational axis, T. The input 92 is generally upstream of the combined gearbox 90 relative the MGB 26 and the output 94 is downstream of the combined gearbox 90 and upstream of the translational thrust system 40 (
Referring to
Portions of the aircraft 10 are controlled by a flight control system 120 illustrated in
Flight control system 120 may include a rotor interface 128 configured to receive commands from the FCC 124 and control one or more actuators, such as a mechanical-hydraulic or electric actuators, for the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32. In an embodiment, inputs 126 including cyclic, collective, pitch rate, and throttle commands that may result in the rotor interface 128 driving the one or more actuators to adjust upper and lower swashplate assemblies (not depicted) for pitch control of the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32. Alternatively, pitch control can be performed without a swashplate assemblies using individual blade control (IBC) in the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32. The rotor interface 128 can manipulate the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32 independently. This allows different collective and cyclic commands to be provided to the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32.
Flight control system 120 may include a translational thrust interface 130 configured to receive commands from the FCC 124 to control one or more actuators, such as a mechanical-hydraulic or electric actuators, for the control of the translational thrust system 40. In an embodiment, inputs 126 may result in the translational thrust interface 130 controlling speed of propeller 42, altering the pitch of propeller blades 47 (e.g., forward or rearward thrust), altering the direction of rotation of propeller 42, controlling gearbox 90 to employ a clutch to engage or disengage the propeller 42, etc.
Flight control system 120 may include a tail fairing interface 132. The tail fairing interface 132 is configured to receive commands from the FCC 124 to control one or more actuators, such as a mechanical-hydraulic or electric actuators, for the active elevator 43 and/or active rudders 45 of
Flight control system 120 may include an engine interface 133. The engine interface 133 is configured to receive commands from the FCC 124 to control engine(s) 24. In an embodiment, inputs 126 include a throttle command from the pilot to adjust the RPM of engine(s) 24. FCC 124 may also send commands to engine interface 133 to control the engine(s) in certain predefined operating modes (e.g., quiet mode).
The FCC 124 includes a processing system 134 that applies models and control laws to augment commands based on aircraft state data. The processing system 134 includes processing circuitry 136, memory 138, and an input/output (I/O) interface 140. The processing circuitry 136 may be any type or combination of computer processors, such as a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, application specific integrated circuit, programmable logic device, and/or field programmable gate array, and is generally referred to as central processing unit (CPU) 136. The memory 138 can include volatile and non-volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), or other electronic, optical, magnetic, or any other computer readable storage medium onto which data and control logic as described herein are stored. Therefore, the memory 138 is a tangible storage medium where instructions executable by the processing circuitry 136 are embodied in a non-transitory form. The I/0 interface 140 can include a variety of input interfaces, output interfaces, communication interfaces and support circuitry to acquire data from the sensors 122, inputs 126, and other sources (not depicted) and communicate with the rotor interface 128, the translation thrust interface 130, tail faring interface 132, engine interface 133, and other subsystems (not depicted).
In exemplary embodiments, the rotor interface 128, under control of the FCC 124, can control the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32 to pitch in different magnitudes and/or different directions at the same time. This includes differential collective, where the upper rotor assembly 28 has a collective pitch different than the collective pitch of the lower rotor assembly 32, in magnitude and/or direction. Differential pitch control also includes differential cyclic pitch control, where the upper rotor assembly 28 has a cyclic pitch different than the cyclic pitch of the lower rotor assembly 32, in magnitude, axis of orientation (e.g., longitudinal or lateral) and/or direction. The differential collective and the differential cyclic pitch control may be accomplished using independently controlled swashplates in the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32. Alternatively, differential collective and the differential cyclic pitch control may be accomplished using individual blade control in the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32.
The ability to independently control the pitch of the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32 allows the lower rotor assembly 32 to be adjusted due to its position beneath the upper rotor assembly 28. The lower rotor assembly 32 is located in the downwash of the upper rotor assembly 28. To accommodate for this, the lower rotor assembly 32 may have a collective pitch that differs from the collective pitch of the upper rotor assembly 28.
In the case of traditional helicopters, as the forward velocity of the aircraft increases, the velocity of the retreating blade relative to the airflow decreases. This causes a stall region to arise at the root of the retreating blade and expand towards to distal end of the blade as speed increases. As this stall region increases, the overall lift vector of the aircraft shifts from the center of the aircraft towards the advancing blade which is providing the majority of lift for the aircraft. This imbalance of lift creates an unstable rolling moment on the aircraft which is stabilized by a combination of reducing forward flight and blade flapping, which reduces overall aircraft lift. With a dual rotor aircraft, such as aircraft 10, the counter rotating rotor heads balance out the torque generated by each rotor head and also balances the lift generated by each advancing blade without the need for blade flapping or reducing the speed of the aircraft. This is made possible by the rigid rotor system. With two rigid rotors, the roll moments cancel at the main rotor shaft.
The use of upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32 allows the pre-cone angle to be set on each individual rotor to reduce bending stress on the blades. In a hinged rotor design, the hinges will naturally go to an angle to reduce bending stress. On a rigid rotor aircraft, such as aircraft 10, there is no hinge, so the pre-cone angle is set to avoid the extra stress attributed to the bending moment. A useful pre-cone angle is one where the centrifugal force of the blade pulling out matches the lift of the blade up. Due to the independent nature of the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32, differential pre-cone is used in aircraft 10. Differential pre-cone refers to the fact that the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32 have different pre-cone angles. The different pre-cone angles for the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32 help maintain tip clearance. In an exemplary embodiment, the pre-angle on the upper rotor assembly 28 is about 3 degrees and the pre-cone angle on the lower rotor assembly 32 is about 2 degrees.
Aircraft 10 is operational in a variety of modes, including take-off, cruise, landing, etc. Cruise mode refers to generally horizontal flight. During cruise, aircraft 10 can reach speeds of above about 200 knots, with speed reaching up to about 250 knots. During cruise mode, the main rotor assembly 18 provides the majority of lift for the aircraft. In exemplary embodiments and flight modes, the main rotor assembly 18 provides greater than about 85% of the lift during cruise mode.
Aircraft 10 may assume various acoustic modes, depending on the flight state. FCC 124 may control RPM of engines 24, RPM of propeller 42, and clutch 90 to engage or disengage the propeller 42 to assume different noise levels. For example, at take-off noise may not be a concern, and there would be no changes in aircraft operation to adjust the noise level. As the aircraft approaches a target, it may be desirable to disengage the propeller 42 using clutch 90 and/or reduce RPM of engines 24 to reduce the noise produced by aircraft 10. The propeller 42 may be disengaged at various other flight states (e.g., high speed) to reduce noise. The RPM of the main rotor assembly 18 and RPM of propeller 42 may be independently controlled (e.g., through clutch 90 or FCC 124). This allows a variety of flight states to be achieved.
The pilot may enter separate commands to reduce aircraft noise, for example, disengaging the propeller 42, reducing engine RPM, and increasing collective pitch as separate inputs. Alternatively, the pilot may select a reduced noise mode (e.g., quiet mode) through single input, and the FCC 124 controls the various aircraft interfaces to achieve the desired mode. For example, the pilot may select a reduced noise mode at input 126, and the FCC automatically disengages the propeller 42, reduces the engine 24 RPM and/or increases collective pitch without further demand on the pilot.
The use of the translational thrust system 40 allows the aircraft 10 to move forward or rearward (depending on the pitch of the propeller blades) independent of the pitch attitude of the aircraft. Cyclic is used to adjust the pitch attitude (nose up, nose down or level) of the aircraft while the translational thrust system 40 provides forward and rearward thrust.
The motor rotor assembly 18 system and the translational thrust system 40 are connected through the main gear box 26. A gear ratio of main gear box 26 is selected so as to keep propeller 42 at a high efficiency and suitable noise level during cruise mode. The gear ratio of main gear box 26 dictates the ratio of the rotor speed of main rotor assembly 18 to propeller speed of propeller 42.
Embodiments of aircraft 10 provide the pilot with increased situational awareness by allowing the aircraft attitude (e.g., the angle of longitudinal axis, L, relative to horizontal) to be adjusted by cyclic pitch of the main rotor assembly 18 and the forward and rearward thrust to be controlled by the translational thrust system 40. This allows a variety of flight modes to be achieved, which allows the pilot to be more aware of their surroundings. Aircraft 10 can take off at a horizontal attitude (e.g., axis L is horizontal), which also may be referred to as vertical take-off. Aircraft 10 may also fly forward or cruise with the nose angled upwards, nose angled downwards or level. Aircraft 10 can hover with the nose angled upwards or downwards or level.
Embodiments provide independent control of the active elevators 43 and/or active rudders 45 as controllable surfaces in the tail section 41. The elevator surfaces 43 may be controlled independently by the FCC 124 through the tail faring interface 132. The rudder surfaces 45 may be controlled independently by the FCC 124 through the tail faring interface 132.
The configuration of aircraft 10 and the controlled afforded by FCC 124 allows aircraft 10 to provide a high bank angle capability at high speeds. For example, in an exemplary embodiment, aircraft 10 can achieve a bank angle of about 60 degrees at about 210 knots.
Aircraft 10 may make use of longitudinal lift offset in trim to compensate for rotor-on-rotor aerodynamic interaction between the upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32. Aircraft 10 may adjust differential longitudinal cyclic as a function of operational states of the aircraft (e.g., take-off, cruise, land, etc.). Differential longitudinal cyclic refers to upper rotor assembly 28 and lower rotor assembly 32 having different cyclic pitch along the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. Differential longitudinal cyclic may also be used to generate yaw moments. Lift offset may be used to control aircraft, where lateral lift offset adjusts roll and longitudinal lift offset adjusts pitch.
FCC 124 may control RPM of engine(s) 24, RPM of propeller 42, and clutch 90 to engage or disengage the propeller 42 to assume different noise levels. For example, at take-off noise may not be a concern, and there would be no changes in aircraft operation to adjust the noise level. As the aircraft approaches a target, it may be desirable to disengage the propeller 42 using clutch 90 and/or reduce RPM of engines 24 to reduce the noise produced by aircraft 10. The propeller 42 may be disengaged at various other flight states (e.g., high speed) to reduce noise. The RPM of the main rotor assembly 18 and RPM of propeller 42 may be independently controlled (e.g., through clutch 90).
The pilot may enter separate commands to reduce aircraft noise, for example, disengaging the propeller 42 and reducing engine RPM as separate inputs. Alternatively, the pilot may select a reduced noise mode (e.g., quiet mode) through single input, and the FCC 124 controls the various aircraft interfaces to achieve the desired mode. For example, the pilot may select a reduced noise mode at input 126, and the FCC automatically disengages the propeller 42 and/or reduces the engine 24 RPM without further demand on the pilot.
Aircraft 10 provides the ability to approach a target and reverse thrust while maintaining an attitude directed at the target.
The use of a dual rotor system and translational thrust allows aircraft 10 to eliminate the need for a variable angle between the main axis of rotation of the rotor system (e.g., axis A in
By contrast, aircraft 10, with translational thrust system 40, does not need to adjust the angle between the main axis of rotation of the rotor system (e.g., axis A in
As shown in
The rotor hub fairing 37 is a sealed fairing, meaning there are few or no passages for air to travel through the interior of the rotor hub fairing 37. In conventional designs, control devices such as pushrods, are exposed near the rotor hubs. The surfaces of these components increase drag on the rotor assembly. The air gaps between various rotor structures (e.g., pushrods and main rotor shaft) also form areas of drag. The sealed rotor hub fairing 37 eliminates air pathways through the rotor hub structure, and eliminates drag associated with such air paths.
Another feature to reduce drag on the rotor hub is positioning control rods, such as push rods for rotor control, internal to the main rotor shaft. Referring to
In an exemplary embodiment, the distance between the hub of the upper rotor assembly 28 and the hub of the lower rotor assembly 32 ranges from about 2 feet to about 2.5 feet. In another exemplary embodiment, the distance between the hub of the upper rotor assembly 28 and the hub of the lower rotor assembly 32 ranges from about 2.1 feet to about 2.4 feet. In another exemplary embodiment, the distance between the hub of the upper rotor assembly 28 and the hub of the lower rotor assembly 32 is about 2.29 feet (0.7 meters).
Aircraft 10 may employ an active vibration control (AVC) system to reduce vibration in the airframe 12. The use of a dual rotor, rigid rotor system tends to produce significant vibration in the airframe 12 and its systems.
In operation, AVC controller 300 receives vibration signals from the AVC sensors 302. AVC controller 300 provides control signals to the AVC actuators 304 to generate forces to reduce the vibration sensed by the AVC sensors 302. Control signals to the AVC actuators 304 may vary in magnitude and frequency to cancel vibrations in aircraft 10. In an exemplary embodiment, AVC controller 300 operates in a feedback mode, where the control signals to AVC actuators 304 are adjusted in response to measured vibration from AVC sensors 302. In an alternate embodiment, AVC controller 300 does not actively measure vibration through AVC sensors 302. Rather, the AVC controller 300 obtains the rotor speed (e.g., through an RPM signal) and applies a control signal to the AVC actuators 304, in an open loop control mode.
The use of independently controlled upper rotor assembly 28 and the lower rotor assembly 32, along with other control surfaces, provides the ability to control yaw using a variety of elements. For example, below a first speed, (e.g., 40 knots), the FCC 124 uses differential collective pitch for yaw control. Above the first speed but below a second speed (e.g., 80 knots), a mix of differential collective and differential cyclic may be used to control yaw. The differential cyclic may be applied along the longitudinal and/or lateral axes of the aircraft. Further, wind direction may be measured by a sensor 122 and used to adjust the differential cyclic about the longitudinal and/or lateral axes. Above the second speed (e.g., 80 knots), the active rudders 45 are used as controllable surfaces to control yaw. The FCC 124 provides commands to the tail fairing interface 132 to control the rudders 45 to adjust yaw.
The use of active elevator 43, with independent control of a left elevator section and a right elevator section, provides for improved stability control. Flight control system 120 performs mixing of collective pitch of main rotor assembly 18 and an angle of elevator 43 to provide stability augmentation.
Embodiments may use wireless techniques to provide tip clearance measurements.
An oscillator 504 sends an excitation signal (e.g., 40 KHz) to a first antenna 502L. It is understood that the excitation signal may be sent to a plurality of antennas in different blades, including multiple antennas in the same blade. As the blades cross, a second antenna, 502 U, receives a signal emitted by the first antenna 502 L. An output level monitor 506 measures the magnitude of the excitation signal.
A blade proximity monitor 508 (e.g., a processor implemented controller) is mounted in the rotating system, e.g., in a rotor hub. This eliminates noise that may be introduced through a conventional slip ring used to convey signals from a rotating system to a stationary system. The blade proximity monitor 508 receives an output signal from the second antenna 502U and the magnitude of the excitation signal from the output level monitor 506. Output signal from the second antenna 502U may be amplified. The blade proximity monitor 508 also receives a RPM signal of the main rotor assembly 18 from a contactor 510. Based on the magnitude of the excitation signal applied to the first antenna 502L and the magnitude of the output signal from the second antenna 502U, blade proximity monitor 508 can detect the distance between the first antenna 502L and the second antenna 502U. This provides an indication of the distance between the rotor blades. The larger the magnitude of the output signal from second antenna 502U, the closer the blades.
The blade proximity monitor 508 may output the measured distance between the blades to a rotor track and balance unit 512. The blade proximity monitor 508 may output the measured distance between the blades to instrument system 514 and to a pilot display 516. If the measured distance goes below a threshold, then an alert may be generated to the pilot that the blades of the upper rotor assembly 32 and the lower rotor assembly 28 are too close to each other.
The use of a dual rotor, main rotor assembly 18 allows improvements in control of main rotor assembly 18. Flight control system 120 may apply different control envelopes to the upper rotor assembly 28 and the lower rotor assembly 32. Flight control system 120 may impose different control ranges the upper rotor assembly 28 and the lower rotor assembly 32 including control elements such as prioritization, gain vs. differential, collective versus cyclic, etc. The upper rotor assembly 28 and the lower rotor assembly 32 may be independently controlled through the use of separate upper and lower swashplates. Alternatively, the upper rotor assembly 28 and the lower rotor assembly 32 may be independently controller using individual blade control (IBC) techniques.
Aircraft 10 employs a fly-by-wire (FBW) control system to reduce pilot work load. In an exemplary embodiment, FCC 124 determines the aircraft airspeed based on one or more sensors 122. The FCC 124 then adjusts the collective pitch of the upper rotor assembly 28 and/or the lower rotor assembly 32 in response to the airspeed. FCC 124 may use a look up table that indexes airspeed to collective pitch. Alternatively, FCC 124 may use an algorithm to compute the collective pitch based on airspeed. As noted above, the collective pitch of upper rotor assembly 28 and the lower rotor assembly 32 may be the same or different.
Another feature to reduce pilot workload includes automatically adjusting the RPM and/or pitch of propeller 42 in response to a velocity or acceleration command from the pilot. Conventional systems would require the pilot to adjust propeller RPM and/or pitch through individual inputs. The flight control system 120 allows the pilot to enter a desired velocity or an acceleration, and the FCC 124 generates the proper commands to the translational thrust interface 130 to establish an RPM and/or pitch to meet the desired velocity or acceleration.
In exemplary embodiments, the flight control system 120 controls the main rotor assembly 18 to prevent the tips of rotor blades 36 from exceeding a threshold speed. In exemplary embodiments, the threshold speed may be 0.9 Mach 1. This threshold would prevent the rotor blade tips from exceeding the speed of sound. The threshold speed may vary, and may be set to limit drag on the rotor blades to below a certain level. In one embodiment, the FCC 124 determines air temperature from sensors 122. FCC 124 may also determine prevailing wind speed and direction from sensors 122. The FCC 124 then computes the threshold speed based on the speed of sound (e.g., Mach 1) at the sensed air temperature. The FCC 124 may set the threshold to 0.9 Mach 1, for example. FCC 124 then controls RPM of the main rotor assembly 18 to prevent the rotor blade tips from exceeding the threshold. In an exemplary embodiment, the FCC maintain 85% of the nominal rotor RPM. FCC 124 may take into account prevailing wind direction and speed in controlling the RPM of the main rotor assembly 18. The 0.9 Mach 1 threshold is only one example, and other speed thresholds may be employed to achieve desired results (e.g., reduce drag).
In exemplary embodiments, active elevator 43 is configured and controlled to improve stability be compensating for forces such as propeller torque and/or rotor downwash. Elevator 43 includes a left elevator and a right elevator on opposite sides of the axis of rotation of the propeller 42. The left elevator and right elevator may be independently controlled to assume different positions. The tail fairing interface 132 is configured to receive commands from the FCC 124 to control one or more actuators, such as a mechanical-hydraulic or electric actuators, to position the left elevator and right elevator independently. This independent control of the left elevator and right elevator aids in compensating propeller torque and/or rotor downwash.
The left elevator and right elevator may also have different physical configurations to compensate for compensating propeller torque and/or rotor downwash. The left elevator and right elevator may be offset relative to each other along the longitudinal and/or lateral axes of aircraft 10. Further, the left elevator and right elevator may have different geometries where one of the left elevator and right elevator is larger than then other along the longitudinal and/or lateral axes of aircraft 10. The left elevator and right elevator may have differing aerodynamic surfaces (e.g., airfoils) as well.
The cockpit of aircraft includes a single, semi-active, collective input (e.g., stick) positioned between the two pilot seats.
Exemplary embodiments of aircraft 10 provide a much smaller footprint than existing aircraft. This makes aircraft 10 well suited for missions in confined terrain, urban settings, and shipboard operations.
In an exemplary embodiment, there is about 5.2 inches from the main rotor pylon to the blade hub centerline. In an exemplary embodiment, there is about 0.7 inch hub clearance to the main rotor pylon. In an exemplary embodiment, the rotor blades 36 extend beyond the nose of the aircraft by at least about 13 inches (0.33 meters). In an exemplary embodiment, rotor blades 36 extend beyond the nose of the aircraft by about 6.9% of the blade span, which may be about 14 inches.
The use of a rigid rotor system, along with the rotor shaft position (e.g., axis A) allows for much easier air-to-air refueling. The stiff rotor blades 36 ease air-to-air refueling by reducing blade flapping, which may result in a blade contacting a tanker fuel line during refueling.
Aircraft 10 provides an improved glide slope angle of about 5-to-1 to about or 6-to-1. This is due to the propeller 42 taking energy out of the airstream, inputting energy into the gear box 26 to increase the speed of the main rotor assembly 18 during autorotation. As shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, the distance between the hub of the upper rotor assembly 28 and the hub of the lower rotor assembly 32 ranges from about 2 feet to about 2.5 feet. In another exemplary embodiment, the distance between the hub of the upper rotor assembly 28 and the hub of the lower rotor assembly 32 ranges from about 2.1 feet to about 2.4 feet. In another exemplary embodiment, the distance between the hub of the upper rotor assembly 28 and the hub of the lower rotor assembly 32 is about 2.29 feet. In another exemplary embodiment, the distance between a midpoint of a blade in the upper rotor assembly 28 and a midpoint of a blade in the lower rotor assembly 32 is about 29.0 inches. In another exemplary embodiment, the distance between a tip of a blade in the upper rotor assembly 28 and a tip of a blade in the lower rotor assembly 32 is about 31.0 inches. In another exemplary embodiment, the distance between the hub of the upper rotor assembly 28 and the hub of the lower rotor assembly 32 is about 14% of the blade span, which may be about 188 inches.
With reference again to
Advancing side compressibility effects are minimized through the selection of airfoils, thickness distribution, twist, blade sweep and rotor speed scheduling with flight velocity. Retreating side blade drag in reversed flow is minimized by the redistribution of blade chord from inboard regions to outer spanwise locations, twist tailoring and incorporating particular airfoils designed to minimize drag under reversed flow conditions. Blade area (rotor solidity) maximizes operating design point performance efficiency while maintaining sufficient maneuver margin. The design parameters are defined to ensure that blade aeroelastic and tip clearance requirements are satisfied as ascertained from independent structural-dynamic and aeroelastic analyses, along with bearing design manufacturing considerations.
The plan view of a rotor blade illustrated in
The blade 36 illustrated and described herein distributes blade chord, twist, taper, sweep, airfoil shape, thickness/chord and chordwise position relative to the feathering axis P to achieve balanced high speed forward flight and hover relative to both efficiency and high thrust capability. The blade region extending inboard of approximately 20% R defines the root region and includes the hub to blade attachment system. The rotor blade 36 is mounted along the root region so that the root region has comparatively minimal aerodynamic significance since it is typically at least partially enclosed within a blade cuff (not shown).
In the illustrated, non-limiting embodiment, the inboard region extends between about 20% R and about 40% R. The configuration of the inboard region of the rotor blade 36 may be determined primarily based on adjacent structural limitations. In one embodiment, the main region extends from about 40% R to about 90% R, and the tip region extends from about 90% R to about 100% R. The main region and the tip region are the primary aerodynamic portions of the blade 36. The tip region may be defined by several design characteristics that differentiate it from the main region, such as for example, changes in twist. and the incorporation of other geometric characteristics such as sweep, dihedral, and anhedral. In one embodiment, illustrated in
With reference to
The airfoil distribution along the blade span is configured to vary between the root region, the inboard region, the main region, and the tip region. In one embodiment, the airfoil distribution adjacent the rotor includes a generally circular cylinder as a result of structural and fairing requirements. When moving towards the outboard end 150 of the blade 36, the airfoil distribution is configured to transition to a cambered ellipse. The main region of the blade 36 may include a thick, conventional airfoil having sharp trailing edges as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,854,593, which is incorporated herein by reference. With reference to
Another characteristic of the rotor blade 36 is blade twist distribution (see
Data supporting graphs illustrated in
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. While the description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, it is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications, variations, alterations, substitutions, or equivalent arrangement not hereto described will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Additionally, while the various embodiment of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description.
This application is a National Stage application of PCT/US2015/053223, filed Sep. 30, 2015, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/058,424, filed Oct. 1, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/058,152 filed on Oct. 1, 2014, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/053223 | 9/30/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/054209 | 4/7/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1344486 | Coffelt | Jun 1920 | A |
2344967 | Bennett | Mar 1944 | A |
2350962 | Hays | Jun 1944 | A |
2482460 | Browne | Sep 1949 | A |
2557127 | Magill | Jun 1951 | A |
2582609 | Steele | Jan 1952 | A |
2665859 | James | Jan 1954 | A |
2698147 | Hovgard | Dec 1954 | A |
2967684 | Knecht | Jan 1961 | A |
2980186 | Strong et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
3002420 | Willits et al. | Oct 1961 | A |
3029048 | Earnest et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3217811 | Hibyan et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3310120 | Vacca | Mar 1967 | A |
3327969 | Head | Jun 1967 | A |
3332643 | Toner | Jul 1967 | A |
3409249 | Bergquist et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3421717 | Di Piro | Jan 1969 | A |
3521971 | Cheney, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
3570786 | Lewis | Mar 1971 | A |
3591109 | McLarty | Jul 1971 | A |
3599907 | Ransom et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3822105 | Jepson | Jul 1974 | A |
4008979 | Cooper et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4020324 | Buscher et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4114843 | Robinson | Sep 1978 | A |
4142837 | De Simone | Mar 1979 | A |
4168045 | Wright et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4248572 | Fradenburgh | Feb 1981 | A |
4304375 | Builta et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4332525 | Cheney, Jr. | Jun 1982 | A |
4334828 | Moffitt | Jun 1982 | A |
4375940 | Lovera et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4386848 | Clendenin et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4392781 | Mouille et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4531692 | Mateus | Jul 1985 | A |
4540144 | Perrella | Sep 1985 | A |
4573873 | Yao et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4583626 | Spridco | Apr 1986 | A |
4681511 | Glatfelter | Jul 1987 | A |
4704070 | Iseman | Nov 1987 | A |
4730795 | David | Mar 1988 | A |
4825375 | Nadkarni et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4856483 | Beavis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5005439 | Jensen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5058824 | Cycon et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5213283 | Gold et al. | May 1993 | A |
5219143 | Staple et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222691 | Gold et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5238203 | Skonieczny et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240204 | Kunz | Aug 1993 | A |
5253979 | Fradenburgh et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5393015 | Piasecki | Feb 1995 | A |
5427336 | Haggerty et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5454530 | Rutherford et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5527004 | Haggerty et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5614908 | Phelan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5845236 | Jolly et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5914691 | Mandai et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6086016 | Meek | Jul 2000 | A |
6086975 | Brick et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098921 | Piasecki | Aug 2000 | A |
6198991 | Yamakawa et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6322324 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6448924 | Hafer, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460802 | Norris | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467726 | Hosoda | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497385 | Wachspress et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6533549 | Schreiber et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6592071 | Kinkead et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6598830 | Ambrose et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6641365 | Karem | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655631 | Brown | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6793173 | Salesse-Lavergne | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6885917 | Osder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886777 | Rock | May 2005 | B2 |
6905091 | Berson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6929215 | Arlton | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7017857 | Hill et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7198223 | Phelps, III et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210651 | Scott | May 2007 | B2 |
7229251 | Bertolotti et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7264199 | Zientek | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7296767 | Palcic et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7413142 | Gmirya | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7434764 | Lappos et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7438259 | Piasecki et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7440825 | Einthoven et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451949 | Eglin | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461819 | Eglin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7471057 | Clary | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7513750 | Moffitt et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7530787 | Bertolotti et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7530790 | Cabrera et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7582032 | Manfredotti et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584923 | Burrage | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600976 | Bagai et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7604198 | Petersen | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7621480 | Darrow, Jr. et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7628355 | Palcic et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648338 | Welsh | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7674091 | Zierten | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7758310 | Cotton et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7823827 | Piasecki et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836701 | Zack et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841829 | Schmaling et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7857252 | Walliser et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857598 | McGeer et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7874526 | Boczar et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7908044 | Piasecki et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930074 | Cherepinsky et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942365 | Palcic et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7967239 | Cotton et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8019490 | Ferren et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8036821 | Cornett et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052094 | Roesch | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052097 | Rollet | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8074925 | Morgan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8113460 | Roesch | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8167233 | Brody et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8170728 | Roesch | May 2012 | B2 |
8181901 | Roesch | May 2012 | B2 |
8201772 | Wendelsdorf et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8303248 | Cabrera et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8376264 | Hong et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8382028 | Jolly | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390516 | Parsche | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8403255 | Piasecki | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8435002 | Jolly et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8473124 | Shue et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473125 | Rischmuller et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8534596 | Lauder | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8548648 | Sahasrabudhe et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548780 | Skelly et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568096 | Eglin | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583295 | Eglin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590827 | Sparks | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8613686 | Stille | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8640985 | Brunken, Jr. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8686918 | Diaz | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8702377 | Cottrell et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8746649 | Haynes et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8763949 | Thomassey | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788123 | Salesse-Lavergne et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801380 | Stille | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812177 | Yates et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8827204 | Long et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8844880 | Corliss | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8864062 | Karem | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8882025 | Lauder | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8920125 | Welsh | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8979495 | D'Anna | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9026277 | Fang et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9046148 | Welsh | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9073627 | Jolly et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9079659 | Van Der Westhuizen et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9085352 | Egli | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9102400 | Cherepinsky | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9120567 | Scott et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9242723 | Wildschek | Jan 2016 | B2 |
10086932 | Eller et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
20020005455 | Carter, Jr. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020088898 | Lucy | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020117579 | Kotoulas et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030057331 | Kinkead et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040007644 | Phelps, III et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040050999 | Hill et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050067527 | Petersen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050127238 | Ballew | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151001 | Loper | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050236518 | Scott | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060011777 | Arlton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027100 | Kozyuk | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054737 | Richardson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060231677 | Zimet et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266153 | Clary | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269411 | Bertolotti et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269413 | Cotton et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269418 | Bagai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070084963 | Nouhaud | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110582 | Bagai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118254 | Barnes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070166163 | Bertolotti et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181741 | Darrow, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187549 | Owen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070262197 | Phelps, III et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080112808 | Schmaling et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080169379 | Cotton et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080234881 | Cherepinsky et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237392 | Piasecki et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249672 | Cherepinsky | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253891 | Cabrera et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090159740 | Brody et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090266078 | Murray | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090304511 | Brannon, III | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003133 | Welsh | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100006697 | Horinouchi | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100012769 | Alber et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100044499 | Dragan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047067 | Houser et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100083631 | Foster et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100224720 | Roesch | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254817 | Agnihotri et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110010936 | Owen | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024555 | Kuhn, Jr. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110036954 | Piasecki | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057071 | Sahasrabudhe et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110144815 | Neumann | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110272519 | Challis | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120034080 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120072056 | Hasan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120111417 | Smith et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120119023 | Moore et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120141273 | Jolly et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120156033 | Cowles | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168556 | Sonneborn | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120175461 | Van Der Westhuizen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120181379 | Eller et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120280857 | Elder | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130011260 | Yoshizaki et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130181087 | Long et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130214087 | Corrigan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233977 | Smiley et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130264412 | Dyrla | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130265185 | Kreitmair-Steck et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274061 | Stille | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130334360 | Norem et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140023499 | Collingbourne | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140030103 | Matalanis et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034774 | Ferrier et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061367 | Fink et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140009650 | Pantalone, III et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140091172 | Arlton | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140095001 | Cherepinsky | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140138492 | Van Staagen | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145025 | Fang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140154084 | Alber | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140191079 | Ehinger et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140271182 | Shundo et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140271222 | Maresh | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140299709 | D'Anna | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314563 | Mayrides et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314573 | Mayrides et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150028152 | Eller et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028597 | Eller et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150050142 | Knag et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150053815 | Litwinowicz et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150100184 | Nathan et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150166175 | Prud′Homme-Lacroix et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150198436 | Cotton | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150203196 | Heverly, II et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150210381 | Greenfield et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150217863 | Modrzejewski et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150225053 | Perkinson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170210463 | Koessick et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170217581 | Hunter et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170225797 | Bredenbeck et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170283046 | Egolf et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170283049 | Weiner | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170305539 | Alber et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180050795 | Geiger et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180148165 | Geiger et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2431273 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2719619 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2719619 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2727832 | May 2014 | EP |
631165 | Oct 1949 | GB |
850037 | Sep 1960 | GB |
03091099 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2009085639 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2011134473 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2015024044 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014045276 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2015061857 | May 2015 | WO |
2015152910 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/036364 dated Jan. 6, 201; dated Jan. 29, 2016; 13 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/040356 dated Sep. 11, 2015; dated Oct. 1, 2015; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/042219 dated Sep. 30, 2015; dated Jan. 12, 2016; 8 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044005 dated Oct. 6, 2015; dated Nov. 6, 2015; 9 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052123 dated Nov. 15, 2015; dated Dec. 17, 2015; 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052549 dated Nov. 14, 2015; dated Dec. 15, 2015; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052783 dated Nov. 10, 2015; dated Dec. 17, 2015; 6 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053070 dated Nov. 30, 2015; dated Dec. 29, 2015; 15 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053095 dated Feb. 5, 2016; dated Feb. 23, 2016; 4 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/051901 dated Sep. 24, 2015; dated Feb. 12, 2016; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052142 dated Mar. 21, 2016; dated Apr. 8, 2016; 5 pages; 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/53091 dated Sep. 30, 2015; dated Feb. 10, 2016; 10 pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052547 dated Sep. 28, 2015; dated Apr. 19, 2016; 8 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/036364 dated Jan. 6, 201; dated Jan. 29, 2016; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/040356 dated Sep. 11, 2015; dated Oct. 1, 2015; 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/042219 dated Sep. 30, 2015; dated Jan. 12, 2016; 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/044005 dated Oct. 6, 2015; dated Nov. 6, 2015; 6 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/051901 dated Sep. 24, 2015; dated Feb. 12, 2016; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the international Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052123 dated Nov. 15, 2015; dated Dec. 17, 2015; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052142 dated Mar. 21, 2016; dated Apr. 8, 2016; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052547 dated Sep. 28, 2015; dated Apr. 19, 2016; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052549 dated Nov. 14, 2015; dated Dec. 15, 2015; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052783 dated Nov. 10, 2015; dated Dec. 17, 2015; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053070 dated Nov. 30, 2015; dated Dec. 29, 2015; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053095 dated Feb. 5, 2016; dated Feb. 23, 2016; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/53091 dated Sep. 30, 2015; dated Feb. 10, 2016; 7 pages. |
(CNET) “Sikorsky S-97 Helicopter Shoots for Speed with Unusual Design” Oct. 3, 2014; 7 pages. |
Bagai, Ashish, “Aerodynamic Design of the X2 Technology Demonstrator TM Main Rotor Blade”, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Apr. 2008, pp. 1-16. |
Cantreii, Paul; “Semi-Rigid Main Rotors;” Web Article; Helicopter Aviation; Apr. 28, 2015; 7 Pages; http://www.copters.com/mech/mr_semi.html. |
Cavalry Pilot; “Chapter 2 Fundamentals of Rotors;” FM 1-514 Chptr 2—Fundamentals of Rotors; Apr. 28, 2015; 10 Pages; http://www.cavalrypilot.com/fm1-514/Ch2.htm. |
Felker, Fort F. III, “Performance and Loads Data from a Wind Tunnel Test of a Full-Scale, Coaxial, Hingless Rotor Helicopter”, NASA Technical Memorandum, Oct. 1981, pp. 1-346. |
Giovanetti et al., “Optimum Design of Compound Helicopters that Use Higher Harmonic Control”; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708; Journal of Aircraft; downloaded Aug. 24, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/1.C032941; 10 pages. |
H-92 Superhawk Multi-Mission Helicopter. AirForce-Technology.com, Aug. 30, 2014; retrieved online: <https://web.archive.org/web/20140830025048/http://aitforce-technology.com/projects/superhawk/>; pp. 2-4. |
http://www.hightech-edge.com/kikorsky-x2-raider-s-97-high-speed-military-helicopter/7936/,(New High Tech-EDGE) posted on Oct. 23, 2010. |
http://www.scribb.com/doc/159484608/Aerodynamics-Clancy#scribd, Published by: Arvind Rajan on Aug. 11, 2013, Clancy L.J.—Aerodynamics 1st Edition 1975 p. 407 Equation 14.9. |
https://web.archive.org/web/20130711053743/http://www.cfidarren.com/hlesson5.htm, (Smith) Jul. 11, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/038796; International Filing Date: Jul. 1, 2015; dated Dec. 11, 2015; 15 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/044240; International Filing Date: Aug. 7, 2015; dated Jun. 30, 2016; 10 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/051897; International Filing Date: Sep. 24, 2015; dated Apr. 8, 2016; 19 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/052619; International Filing Date: Sep. 28, 2015; dated Mar. 3, 2016; 13 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/052645; International Filing Date: Sep. 28, 2015; dated Feb. 9, 2016; 13 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/052802; International Filing Date: Sep. 29, 2015; dated Apr. 1, 2016; 14 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/052864; International Filing Date: Sep. 29, 2015; dated Feb. 12, 2016; 15 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion; International Application No. PCT/US2015/052874; International Filing Date: Sep. 29, 2015; dated Mar. 3, 2016; 16 Pages. |
Johnson et al.,“Design and Performance of Lift-Offset Rotorcraft for Short-Haul Missions”; NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California; Presented on Jan. 18, 2012; 26 pages. |
Johnson, Wayne; “Influence of Lift Offset on Rotorcraft Performance”, Aeromechanics Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California; presented Jan. 23, 2008; 31 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053099 dated Feb. 2, 2015; dated Feb. 10, 2015; 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053223 dated Jan. 26, 2016; dated Feb. 12, 2016; 8 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053229 dated Feb. 8, 2016; dated Feb. 19, 2016; 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053235 dated Feb. 4, 2016; dated Feb. 23, 2016; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053432 dated Feb. 5, 2016; dated Feb. 26, 2016; 9 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053479 dated Feb. 8, 2016; dated Feb. 23, 2016Y; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US15/53090 dated Feb. 11, 2016; dated Feb. 26, 2016; 11 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US15/53530 dated Feb. 9, 2016; dated Mar. 4, 2016; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/052820 dated Feb. 18, 2016; dated Jun. 3, 2016; 12 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053241 dated Sep. 30, 2015; dated Feb. 23, 2016; 7 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2015/52907 dated Sep. 29, 2015; dated Mar. 3, 2016; 7 pages. |
S-69 (XH-59A) Advancing Blade Concept Demonstrator, Sikorsky Archives, Apr. 21, 2013 retrieved online: <http://www.sikorskyarchives.com/S-69%20(XH-59A).php>; pp. 1, 4-6, 11 and 12. |
Sikorsky—S-97 raider X2 Technology Family of Helicopters SAR & Combat Simulation [360p]'. Arronlee33. Jul. 31, 2013 [online], [retrieve on Mar. 2, 2016]. Retrieved from the internet:<URL:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRv5OxPFeQo> Entire document. |
Sikorsky S-97 Raider Aircraft'. The Editors. (Sep. 26, 2013) [online]. Retrieved from the internet: <URL:http://www.richardcyoung.com/terrorism/weapons/x2-raider-prototype/> Entire document, especially Fig. 2. |
The Rise of Radical New Rotorcraft'.Wise. Mar. 6, 2014 [online]. Retrieved from the internet : <URL:http://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a10616/the-rise-of-radical-new-rotorcraft-16850989/> Entire document, especially para [3]; Fig.3. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US15/53090 dated Feb. 11, 2016; dated Feb. 26, 2016; 10 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US15/53530 dated Feb. 9, 2016; dated Mar. 4, 2016; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053099 dated Feb. 2, 2015; dated Feb. 10, 2015; 9 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053223 dated Jan. 26, 2013; dated Feb. 12, 2016; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053229 dated Feb. 8, 2016; dated Feb. 19, 2016; 10 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053235 dated Feb. 4, 2016; dated Feb. 23, 2016; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053241 dated Sep. 30, 2016; dated Feb. 23, 2016; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053432 dated Feb. 5, 2016; dated Feb. 26, 2016; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/053479 dated Feb. 8, 2016; dated Feb. 23, 2016Y; 4 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/52820 dated Sep. 29, 2016; dated Jun. 3, 2016; 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/52907 dated Sep. 29, 2015; dated Mar. 3, 2016; 6 pages. |
Bourtsev, Boris et al.; “Coaxial Helicopter Rotor Design & Aeromechanics” Twentyfifth European Forum, 1999, pp. 1-20. |
Coleman, Colin P. “A Survey of Theoretical and Experimental Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamic Research”, Nasa Technical Paper 3675, 1997, pp. 1-34. |
European Search Report for EP Application No. 15846472.7 dated Feb. 27, 2018; 13 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for application No. 15846761.3; dated Apr. 23, 2018; 11 Pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 15847641.6-1010, dated Apr. 20, 2018 (7 pp.). |
Extended European Search Report issued in EP Application No. 15847201.9 dated May 14, 2018, 5 pages. |
Field Manual 1-514; “Fundamentals of Rotor and Power Train Maintenance—Techniques and Procedures”; Ch. 2 Fundamentals of rotors; http://enlistement.us/field-manuals/fm-1-514-fundamentals-of-rotor-and-power-train-maintenance.shtml (Year: 1991). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170291699 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62058152 | Oct 2014 | US | |
62058424 | Oct 2014 | US |