Dual safety-edge for an overhead door

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6427382
  • Patent Number
    6,427,382
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 6, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 6, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A door assembly comprising a door body having a bottom edge is disclosed. The door body is selectively movable up and down to open and close an opening. The door assembly further comprises a safety edge attached to the bottom edge of the door body, the safety edge being an extrudate extruded from a deformable material and comprising a first and second chamber formed in integrated cooperative redundancy in the extrudate, wherein the first chamber comprises a first sensor body and the second chamber comprises a second sensor body, each sensor body being responsive to an impact.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The invention relates to industrial doors, in particular overhead industrial doors with closure safety mechanisms.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Overhead doors have been used for many years to secure various enclosures including manufacturing plants, warehouses, garages, and other industrial doorways. It is well known in the art to provide a safety device on the leading edge of these doors to minimize both damage to the doors and potential injury to users when the door is closing. Such safety devices are generally coupled to a door controller. If the safety device encounters an impact, a signal is transmitted to the controller. The signal causes the door to act in a prescribed manner. For example, the controller may cause the door to stop or reverse direction. It is desirable to provide a safety edge that provides multi-directional sensitivity and allows for some degree of door over-travel.




Typically, safety edges of the type found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,462,885 to Miller are employed. In particular, the safety edge in the '885 Miller patent is comprised of a resiliently compressible structure. The resilient structure includes a pair of flexible contact strips which are electrically connected to a motor. Upon deflection of the resilient structure, the contact strips engage one another and transmit an electrical signal to the motor, resulting in stoppage or reversal of the door. Alternatively, pneumatically actuated safety edges may be employed. Pneumatically actuated safety edges consist of fluid-filled chambers which are coupled to pressure sensors. The pressure sensors are responsive to pulses or changes in fluid pressure within a chamber. While both of these safety edges assist in preventing damage to the door and provide some degree of safety to the users, there exist inherent limitations in both systems.




Specifically, safety edges such as those found in the '885 Miller patent are less sensitive to impact applied perpendicular to the door body than pneumatically actuated safety edges. Furthermore, safety edges such as those in the '885 Miller patent tend to allow for only minimal door over-travel. Pneumatically actuated safety edges, on the other hand, tend to be more sensitive to impact in multiple directions. However, like the safety edges described above, conventional pneumatically actuated safety edges typically allow for limited door over-travel.




To provide a degree of over-travel, the pneumatic chamber of such a safety edge would have to be particularly large. By increasing the size of the pneumatic chamber, however, the sensitivity of the safety edge would decrease as the safety edge would require a greater impact to actuate the safety feature. Alternatively, some degree of over-travel can be obtained by attaching multiple sensors one to the other. Such a system is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,921,026 to Miller. The '026 Miller patent employs an adjustable height sensing edge, wherein sensors are attached one to another in order to compensate for varying door heights. The system disclosed in the '026 Miller patent, however, requires multiple connectable sensors which result in increased manufacturing costs. Moreover, there exists the possibility of failure of the connecting members used to connect the sensors of the '026 Miller patent. Accordingly, the edge in the '026 Miller patent could also result in increased maintenance and replacement, as well costs associated with such maintenance and repair.




While the safety edges discussed above have been met with a reasonable degree of success, the present invention is provided to solve the problems discussed above and other problems, and to provide advantages and aspects not provided by prior doors of this type.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a safety edge for a door assembly having a door body with a bottom edge.




According to one aspect of the present invention, the safety edge is an extrudate extruded from a deformable material. The extrudate comprises a first and second chamber formed in integrated cooperative redundancy in the extrudate. The first chamber comprises a first sensor body and the second chamber comprises a second sensor body. Each sensor body is responsive to an impact.




According to another aspect of the present invention, the second sensor body is sufficiently rigid to absorb impact parallel to the safety edge without causing complete deformation of the second chamber, but sufficiently deformable to actuate the second pressure sensor upon receiving an impact perpendicular to the second sensor body.




According to yet another aspect of the present invention, a door assembly is provided in which one of the sensor bodies has a greater sensitivity to impact perpendicular to the sensor body. Likewise, the other of the sensor bodies has a greater sensitivity to impact parallel to the sensor body than the first sensor body.




According to still another aspect of the present invention, the type of the first sensor body with respect to the type of the second sensor body results in one of the sensor bodies having a greater sensitivity than the other sensor body.




Other advantages and aspects of the present invention will become apparent upon reading the following description of the drawings and detailed description of the invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a front view of an overhead door assembly and dual safety edge according to the present invention;





FIG. 2

is cross-section view, in perspective, of the overhead door assembly of

FIG. 1

taken along the line


2





2


;





FIG. 3

is a partial front view of the dual safety edge of

FIG. 1

;





FIGS. 4A-C

is a end view of a dual safety edge according to the present invention, illustrating deformation of the pneumatic chamber as a force applied to the safety edge from a direction parallel to the safety edge;





FIGS. 5A-C

is a end view of a dual safety edge according to the present invention, illustrating deformation of the pneumatic chamber as a force applied to the safety edge from a direction perpendicular to the safety edge;





FIG. 6

is a end view of an embodiment of the dual safety edge having a first sensor body with a deflectable element;





FIG. 7

is a partial perspective view of an embodiment of the dual safety edge having a first sensor body with a deflectable element;





FIG. 8

is a partial perspective view of an embodiment of the dual safety edge having a first sensor body with a first and a second deflectable element; and,





FIG. 9

is a partial perspective view of another embodiment of the dual safety edge having a first sensor body wherein the deflectable element is a conductive polymer that defines at least a portion of the first sensor body.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings, and will herein be described in detail, preferred embodiments of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiments illustrated.





FIGS. 1-9

disclose an improvement on previous safety edges for overhead door assemblies. In particular, the present invention contemplates combining sensor bodies, in a singular extrudate to provide an improved safety edge system for an overhead door with.




Specifically,

FIGS. 1-9

disclose a safety edge


1


for a door assembly


5


comprising a door body


10


having a bottom edge


12


. The door body


10


may be selectively moved up and down to open and close an opening. The safety edge


1


is an extrudate


3


extruded from a deformable resilient material. The extrudate


3


is comprised of a first chamber


7


and second chamber


9


formed in integrated cooperative redundancy in the extrudate


3


. The first chamber


7


comprises a first sensor body


16


and the second chamber


9


comprises a second sensor body


18


. According to the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 1-5

, each of the sensor bodies


16


,


18


is a pneumatic sensor body responsive to an impact. Furthermore, each of the sensor bodies


16


,


18


may be in communication with a door controller (not shown) such that the door body


10


responds (e.g., stops or reverses direction of travel) upon impact to the sensor bodies


16


,


18


.




In a preferred embodiment, each of the pneumatic sensor bodies


16


,


18


is in independent communication with the door controller. Accordingly, each of the pneumatic sensor bodies


16


,


18


works autonomously, and each generates a separate signal which is transmitted to the controller upon impact of a predetermined force to that sensor body


16


,


18


.




One of the sensor bodies


16


,


18


has a greater sensitivity to an impact perpendicular to the sensor body


16


,


18


, than the other sensor body


16


,


18


. Likewise, the other of the sensors bodies


16


,


18


has a greater sensitivity to an impact parallel to the sensor body


16


,


18


than the sensor body


16


,


18


that is more sensitive to perpendicular impact. According to the present invention, this disparity in the sensitivity of the sensor bodies may be achieved by way of the various mechanisms described below.




The first and second sensor bodies


16


,


18


are pneumatically coupled to a fluid pressure sensor


22


. The pressure sensor


22


is responsive to changes in the pressure of the fluid in the chambers


7


,


9


. Specifically, upon sensing a change in pressure, the pressure sensor generates a signal indicative of the change. Such pressure sensors are of the type generally known in the art. The signal is subsequently communicated, in some form, to the controller at which point the controller causes the door body


10


to respond in a predetermined manner. In the preferred embodiment, the chambers


7


,


9


contains air which has been charged at atmospheric pressure. However, the chambers


7


,


9


may be filled with any fluid suitable to provide a change in pressure upon receiving an impact in excess of a predetermined force. According to this embodiment of the present invention, the second chamber


9


has a generally rectangular cross section. The parallelogram shape of the second chamber


9


allows the second pneumatic sensor body


18


to be sufficiently rigid to absorb impact parallel to the safety edge


1


without causing complete deformation of the second chamber


9


. As illustrated in

FIGS. 5A-C

, the natural angles of the rectangular shaped second chamber


9


, however, tend to allow the second chamber


9


to deflect under forces applied perpendicular to the safety edge


1


. This deflection results in sufficient volumetric deformation of the second chamber


9


to actuate the associated pressure sensor


22


.




Thus, by providing rigidity through geometric configuration, the safety edge


1


maintains a degree of integrity, allowing the safety edge


1


to absorb parallel impact that may result form door over-travel; while simultaneously providing a safety system responsive to multi-directional impact. It is contemplated that the cross-section of the second sensor body


18


in this embodiment be any parallelogram capable of responding to loads in a direction perpendicular to the safety edge


1


as described above.




According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the extrudate


3


is extruded from foam. This foam may be closed cell medium/soft density ethylene propylene (EPT) foam, or any other foam suitable to provide both structural integrity and flexibility when used in connection with the applications described herein. Likewise, while foam allows for both suitable structural integrity and flexibility, it is contemplated that the extrudate


3


be extruded from any material that provides these characteristic in combination.




Alternatively, the disparity in the sensitivity of the first and second sensor bodies


16


,


18


may be due to the type of the first sensor body


16


vis-á-vis the second sensor body


18


. For example, in the embodiment of the invention shown in

FIGS. 6-9

, the first sensor body


16


includes a first mechanical actuator and the second sensor body


18


includes a second and structurally distinguishable of mechanical actuator.

FIG. 6

illustrates one type of actuator that may be employed in the sensor bodies


16


,


18


. The actuator shown in

FIG. 6

includes a sensing circuit


24


having at least one mechanically deflectable element


26


. The deflectable element


26


is positioned within at least a portion of the sensor body


16


,


18


such that an impact to the sensor body


16


,


18


in excess of a predetermined force will deflect the deflectable element


26


. The deflection of the deflectable element


26


changes the electrical state of the sensing circuit


24


. A signal indicative of the change in the sensing circuit


24


is generated. Such signal is subsequently communicated to the controller, thereby causing the door body


10


to respond in a predetermined manner. The signal may be transmitted to the controller directly, or the signal may be conditioned or converted by some appropriate intermediate means.




It is contemplated that the change in the sensing circuit


24


be created by one of various types of electrical phenomenon. For example, the deflectable element


26


may be a piezoelectric element, wherein the deflection of the piezoelectric element results in a change in voltage in the circuit


24


. Alternatively, the deflectable element


26


may be made from a material which, upon deflection, results in a change in the inductance of the circuit


24


.




As shown in

FIG. 8

, the sensing circuit


24


may also include a second deflectable element


28


disposed adjacent the first deflectable element


26


, wherein either the first or second deflectable elements


26


,


28


is coupled to a power source (not shown). The first and second deflectable elements


26


,


28


are oriented such that when the sensor body


16


,


18


receives an impact in excess of a predetermined force, either the first or second deflectable elements


26


,


28


is deflected toward the other deflectable element


26


,


28


in such a manner as to change the electrical state of the circuit


24


. In this configuration, the sensing circuit


24


is normally an open circuit. Deflection of the deflectable elements


26


,


28


, one toward the other, results in conductively closing the circuit


24


. Closure of the circuit


24


causes a signal to be generated, which is in turn transmitted in some form to the controller.




As shown in

FIG. 9

, the deflectable element


26


may also be a conductive polymer


32


that defines at least a portion of the sensor body


16


,


18


. When the sensor body


16


,


18


is impacted by a force in excess of a predetermined amount, the conductive polymer


32


deflects in such a manner that the electrical state of the polymer


32


is changed. The conductive polymer


32


may be of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,060,527, generally marketed by Matamatic, Inc. Again, the change in electrical state of the polymer


32


generates a signal indicative of the change which, in turn, is transmitted to the controller.




While the specific embodiments have been illustrated and described, numerous modifications come to mind without significantly departing from the spirit of the invention and the scope of protection is only limited by the scope of the accompanying claims.



Claims
  • 1. A safety edge for attaching to a bottom edge of a door that is selectively movable up and down to open and close an opening, the safety edge comprising:a foam extrudate having a first chamber and second chamber disposed above the first chamber, the first and second chambers being integrally formed in the extrudate, wherein the first chamber comprises a first pneumatic sensor body and the second chamber comprises a second pneumatic sensor body, each pneumatic sensor body being responsive to an impact, the first pneumatic sensor body having a greater sensitivity to impact parallel to the first pneumatic sensor body than the second pneumatic sensor body and the second pneumatic sensor body having a greater sensitivity to impact perpendicular to the safety edge than the first pneumatic sensor body.
  • 2. The safety edge of claim 1, wherein the first pneumatic sensor body has a greater sensitivity to impact parallel to the first pneumatic sensor body than the second pneumatic sensor body and the second pneumatic body has a greater sensitivity to impact perpendicular to the safety edge than the first pneumatic sensor body.
  • 3. The safety edge of claim 2, wherein the second chamber has a generally rectangular cross section.
  • 4. The safety edge of claim 1, wherein the first and second pneumatic sensor bodies are each pneumatically coupled to a fluid pressure sensor, the pressure sensor being responsive to changes in fluid pressure and generating a signal indicative of said changes in pressure.
  • 5. The safety edge of claim 4, wherein the first pneumatic sensor body and the second pneumatic sensor body are in electrical communication with a door controller.
  • 6. The safety edge of claim 4, wherein the second pneumatic sensor body is sufficiently rigid to absorb impact parallel to the safety edge without causing complete deformation of the second chamber, but sufficiently deformable to actuate the second pressure sensor upon receiving an impact perpendicular to the safety edge.
  • 7. The door assembly of claim 1, wherein the first and second chambers are formed in integrated cooperative redundancy.
  • 8. A door assembly comprising:a door body having a bottom edge, the door body being selectively movable up and down to open and close an opening; and an extrudate attached to the bottom edge of the door body, the extrudate being extruded from a deformable and resilient material and comprising a first chamber and second chamber disposed above the first chamber, the first and second chambers being integrally formed in the extrudate, wherein the first chamber comprises a first pneumatic sensor body and the second chamber comprises a second pneumatic sensor body, each pneumatic sensor body being responsive to an impact, the first pneumatic sensor body having a greater sensitivity to impact parallel to the first pneumatic sensor body than the second pneumatic sensor body and the second pneumatic sensor body having a greater sensitivity to impact perpendicular to the safety edge than the first pneumatic sensor body.
  • 9. The door assembly of claim 8, wherein the first and second chambers are formed in integrated cooperative redundancy.
  • 10. The door assembly of claim 8, wherein the second chamber has a generally rectangular cross section.
  • 11. The door assembly of claim 8, wherein the first and second pneumatic sensor bodies are each pneumatically coupled to a fluid pressure sensor, the pressure sensor being responsive to changes in fluid pressure and generating a signal indicative of said changes in pressure.
  • 12. The door assembly of claim 11, wherein the first pneumatic sensor body and the second pneumatic sensor body are in electrical communication with a door controller.
  • 13. The door assembly of claim 11, wherein the second pneumatic sensor body is sufficiently rigid to absorb impact parallel to the safety edge without causing complete deformation of the second chamber, but sufficiently deformable to actuate the second pressure sensor upon receiving an impact perpendicular to the safety edge.
  • 14. A door assembly comprising:a door body having a bottom edge, the door body being selectively movable up and down to open and close an opening; and, an extrudate attached to the bottom edge of the door body, the extrudate being extruded from a deformable and resilient material comprising a first chamber and second chamber, the first and second chambers being integrally formed in the extrudate, wherein the first chamber comprises a first pneumatic sensor body and the second chamber comprises a second pneumatic sensor body, each pneumatic sensor body being responsive to an impact, the first pneumatic sensor body having a greater sensitivity to impact parallel to the first pneumatic sensor body than the second pneumatic sensor body and the second pneumatic sensor body having a greater sensitivity to impact perpendicular to the safety edge than the first pneumatic sensor body.
  • 15. A door assembly comprising:a door body having a bottom edge, the door being selectively movable up and down to open and close an opening; and, an extrudate attached to the bottom edge of the door body, the extrudate defining a safety edge and being extruded from a deformable and resilient material, the extrudate having a first and second chamber integrally formed in the extrudate, wherein the first chamber comprises a first sensor body and the second chamber comprises a second sensor body, each sensor body being responsive to an impact; wherein at least one of the first and second sensor bodies includes a sensing circuit, the circuit having at least one mechanically deflectable element, the deflectable element being positioned such that an impact to the sensor body in excess of a predetermined force will deflect the deflectable element sufficiently to change the electrical state of the sensing circuit and generate a signal indicative of said change, and wherein the deflectable element is a conductive polymer that structurally defines at least a portion the sensor body, the polymer changing its electrical properties when deflected by impact.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/507,834, filed on Feb. 22, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,286,257 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/121,044, filed Feb. 22, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (24)
Number Name Date Kind
3303303 Miller Feb 1967 A
3315050 Miller Apr 1967 A
3462885 Miller Aug 1969 A
4143367 Schestag Mar 1979 A
4273974 Miller Jun 1981 A
4501963 Perisic Feb 1985 A
4676293 Hanssen Jun 1987 A
4924214 Hill May 1990 A
4944116 Mewald Jul 1990 A
4953608 Larsson Sep 1990 A
5027552 Miller et al. Jul 1991 A
5057819 Valenti Oct 1991 A
5141044 Hying et al. Aug 1992 A
5157230 Blubaugh Oct 1992 A
5198974 Orsat Mar 1993 A
5239146 Blubaugh Aug 1993 A
5299617 Hying et al. Apr 1994 A
5384982 Galperin Jan 1995 A
5438798 Plamper et al. Aug 1995 A
5566504 Pitel Oct 1996 A
5629681 Duvall et al. May 1997 A
5912625 Scofield Jun 1999 A
5921026 Miller Jul 1999 A
6286257 Gregoriou et al. Sep 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
2610559 Dec 1976 DE
2663363 Dec 1991 FR
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/121044 Feb 1999 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/507834 Feb 2000 US
Child 09/923495 US