This invention relates to water detention and treatment, and in particular to vaults, boxes, systems, and methods of treatment systems to capture pollutants from storm water runoff and prevent the conveyance of these pollutants from entering a receiving water body or landscape area, which is designed to be a part of a local permanent storm water drainage infrastructure, where a single treatment system combines both drainage conveyance, multi-level treatment techniques, variable hydraulic capabilities, and easy and inexpensive methods for servicing the system.
Since the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972 the federal government through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has mandated progressively tighter controls over the quantities of pollutants and contaminants that are allowed to be released into our nation's waters. These progressively tighter mandates also encompass control of peak flows and/or volumes and the rate at which they can be discharged into existing water ways or drainage infrastructures. These resulting mandates and controls have given birth to new programs and procedures collectively referred to as storm water management.
Devices, systems and procedures that remove or reduce the pollutants and contaminates and/or control peak flows and volumes are often referred to as best management practices (BMPs). The BMPs can utilize natural, artificial or man-made techniques, and even combinations of either and/or both. Some examples of these BMPs include trash filters, sedimentation basins, retention and detention ponds, wetlands, infiltration trenches, grass swales, various types of media filters, and various types of natural filter systems including sand filters, and aggregate filters including natural and artificial wetlands.
BMPs typically use one or more mechanisms to remove the pollutants and contaminates. These mechanisms include sedimentation, filtration, absorption, adsorption, flocculation, stripping, leaching, bioremediation, and chemical processes including oxidation reduction, ion exchange, and precipitation.
Furthermore, storm water treatment systems can also be classified in relationship to the treatment level in which they are being used. In this respect, the term treatment is generally used to describe the unit processes that are used to reduce the quantities of pollutants and containments in storm water runoff.
For example, basic or pre-treatment typically refers to the removal of gross solids, sediments and larger debris through the processes of settling and screening. Enhanced or advanced treatment typically refers to processes or reducing targeted pollutants.
Filtration is a common form of enhanced treatment for storm water. Filtration utilizes a combination of physical, chemical, and biological processes. Types of filtration greatly vary dependent on the media use. Medias can be both inert and/or sorbent and are also strongly linked to natural biological processes that thrive in and/or around the media environment. Advanced filtration techniques especially include chemical and biological processes and generally include, but are not limited to processes that bring storm water in contact with plants including both macrophytes and microphytes. And the plants are both visible and invisible to the naked eye.
The reduction of nutrients that are conveyed via storm water runoff are in the forefront of the various pollutants of concern. For example; the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has mandated that the state of Florida reduce the overall pollutant discharge of the state by approximately ⅓. To this end the EPA has established a numeric nutrient criterion for all water bodies of the state for total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN). These nutrient numeric values cannot be exceeded within these water bodies of the state. The result of exceeding these numeric values will result with the state of Florida being fined by the EPA.
Common pollutants typically found in storm water flow can include sediment, foliage, litter, nutrients, metals, hydrocarbons, and bacteria. Because pollutants vary significantly in their respective physical characteristics, a variety of techniques are applied to better address difficulties with capturing the pollutants. For example; capturing hydrocarbons, which are typically in a liquid state, require a different technique than capturing litter which are in a solid state.
Storm water treatment systems that make use of filtration media can vary significantly just by making use of different types of filtration media. Understanding that effectiveness will vary for different types of filtration media, has filtration media functions by combining the processes of physical filtration, sorbent or reactive surfaces, and biological activity.
Physical filtration will physically prevent the conveyance of solids, sorbent or reactive surfaces will chemically bond to the pollutants, and the biological activity will consume pollutants. Physical filtration whether by use of a filtration media or a screen can be an effective technique for capturing solids. Contained within and attached to the solids are a wide spectrum of pollutants of concern that can range from nutrients, to litter, to bacteria. A difficulty with physical filtration is that the collected solids can become so numerous that the rate of filtration is slowed to an ineffective flow rate. Servicing of the filtration media is typically required, and the servicing often requires the media to be replaced as a part of servicing.
Filtration media will have sorbent or reactive surfaces that vary in effectiveness depending on the type of media. For storm water treatment applications, the media is granular in shape. However, the reactivity of the media surfaces is limited by the number of receptors on the surface of the media.
Making use of media that has a lot of surface area will increase the number of available receptors. A common method to increasing the surface area of the media is using media that is small in granular size. However, the smaller the granular size of the media the more likely the media will be to bind due to the collection of solids within the media. In addition, the receptors can be binded by solids which prevent the water flow from reaching the surface of the media granules.
Because there is not a single storm water treatment technique that is the best for removing all pollutants of concern, a treatment system that combines multiple techniques in a treatment train arrangement will likely yield a wide spectrum of storm water treatment success. In addition, there is an economic consideration for applying storm water treatment. For example; the costs and frequency for servicing a storm water treatment system will be an indicator as to the sustainability of the system, and all storm water treatment systems require servicing.
Thus, the need exists for solutions to the above problems with the prior art.
An objective of the present invention is to provide vaults, boxes, systems, and methods of using treatment systems to capture pollutants from storm water runoff and prevent the conveyance of these pollutants from entering a receiving water body or landscape area, which is designed to be a part of a local permanent storm water drainage infrastructure, where the system combines both drainage conveyance, multi-level treatment techniques, variable hydraulic capabilities, and easy and inexpensive methods for servicing the invention.
Storm water pollution prevention system that prevents the conveyance of a wide spectrum of pollutants from being conveyed to a receiving body of water or landscape area, and incorporates multiple stages and processes for the treatment of water that is shed from an area as a result of rain.
The system incorporates hydro-dynamic separation, screen filtration with or without media filtration all in a single treatment system. This treatment system can be divided into distinct zones by baffles that span the width of the vault. These baffles will help to isolate solids that settle in the lower settling chambers from turbulent water flow. In addition, the use of a skimmer baffle will help to prevent the conveyance of floatables. For additional treatment, filtration media can be added between the skimmer baffle and the outflow pipe.
Because the cross-sectional conveyance through the treatment system is much greater than that of the inflow pipe, as water enters into the vault the linear velocity of the water flow is reduced. In addition, the inflowing water hits onto a flow spreader located not far from the inflow pipe. This flow spreader will influence the spreading of the flow wide while creating a vortex to the left and right of the inflowing water. The vortex created to the left and right of the flow spreader will influence solids to settle into the lower settling chambers. A deflector located along the underside of the flow spreader will aid with preventing the turbulent water entering the treatment system from scouring previously captured sediments. Essentially, a calm zone is created below the horizontal deflector. This zone can enable fine particles to settle while preventing previously captured fine particles from being re-suspended out of this settling zone.
After the storm water flow has been spread wide by the flow spreader, the flow will enter into the body of a screen system (dual screen systems) located on each side of the vault. The primary purpose of the dual screen systems is capture floating debris such as litter and foliage. As water flow and floating debris enters into the dual screen systems, water can pass through the screens and the floating debris can be retained within the screens.
The dual screens can be positioned within the vault so that the bottom of the screen systems can be above the invert elevation of the outflow pipe. After the rain event has ended the hydraulic gradeline within the vault will lower to an elevation equal to that of the outflow pipe invert. Because the captured debris in the screen systems is higher in elevation than that of the water level retained in the vault, the captured debris will be stored in a dry state between rain events. Storing the captured debris in a dry state between rain events can prevent the pollutants contained in the floating debris from diffusing into the water over time.
Once the water flow exits the dual screen systems a skimmer located between the screen systems and the oufflow pipe can act to prevent floatables from being conveyed downstream.
During heavy rain events when the stormwater flows are very high and the hydraulic grade line (hgl) in the treatment system is adequately elevated, it is possible that the hgl will be higher than the top of the flow spreader and/or dual debris capture screen systems. During high flowing rain events it may become necessary for water flow to bypass the flow spreader, screen systems, and skimmer to prevent flooding upstream within the water shed basin. Because the width of the treatment vault is significantly greater than that of the inflow and oufflow conveyances, the potential conveyance through the treatment vault is very high when the hgl is above the specialized interior components.
If the debris capture screen systems become blinded by debris and the potential flow through the screens is minimized, the blinding may cause the hgl to rise above the top of the flow spreader and screen systems, and water flow can bypass the screens. Bypassing water flow can be important to prevent possible flooding of the upstream watershed basin. Because the width of the treatment vault is significantly greater than that of the inflow and oufflow conveyances, the potential conveyance through the treatment vault is very high when the hgl is above the specialized interior components.
For additional treatment, filtration media can be placed between the skimmer and the outflow pipe. The filtration media can be contained within vessels or a screen system so that the water flow cannot dislodge the media and wash it down stream. Water flow can be diverted downward by the skimmer, and then the water flow will upflow through the media. As the water passes through the media sorbent surfaces, physical filtration, and biological activity can act to capture pollutants.
In the event that a large rain event occurs and the water level within the treatment system rises in elevation above the screen systems and skimmer, water flow can convey above all the specialized components of the treatment system. The cross-sectional conveyance through the vault, and above the screen systems and skimmer, far exceeds that of the inflow and outflow pipes. Because the potential water conveyance above all the specialized components of the treatment system is so great, then potential upstream flooding is avoided.
Eventually, the treatment system requires servicing. The high pressure water servicing system can dramatically reduce the required time to remove the captured debris in the lower chambers. The servicing system has high water pressure jets that will flush captured debris toward the center of the settling chambers. These jets will liquefy the captured debris from underneath, turn the captured debris into a slurry, and then flush the debris slurry toward the center of the settling chambers so that a vacuum truck can easily remove the slurry.
The use of this high pressure servicing system avoids the need for a service technician to enter the vault to perform servicing. The regulations set by OSHA for personnel to enter a confined space, such as a storm water treatment system for servicing, are complicated, time consuming, and costly.
Various problems solved by this invention are as follows:
Further objects and advantages of this invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the presently preferred embodiments which are illustrated schematically in the accompanying drawings.
First Embodiment Dual Vortex Baffle Box/Vault/System with Flow Spreader and Screened Deflector and Debris Ramp
Second Embodiment, Includes First Embodiment with Media
Third Embodiment, Includes First Embodiment with Hydroslide
Fourth Includes First Embodiment with Hydroslide & Media
Fifth Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Large Flow Spreader
Sixth Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Large Flow Spreader & Hydroslide
Seventh Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Convex Large Flow Spreader
Eighth Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Concave Large Flow Spreader
Before explaining the disclosed embodiments of the present invention in detail it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its applications to the details of the particular arrangements shown since the invention is capable of other embodiments. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
In the Summary above and in the Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments and in the accompanying drawings, reference is made to particular features (including method steps) of the invention. It is to be understood that the disclosure of the invention in this specification does not include all possible combinations of such particular features. For example, where a particular feature is disclosed in the context of a particular aspect or embodiment of the invention, that feature can also be used, to the extent possible, in combination with and/or in the context of other particular aspects and embodiments of the invention, and in the invention generally.
In this section, some embodiments of the invention will be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime notation is used to indicate similar elements in alternative embodiments.
A list of components will now be described.
Referring to
A dual screen system 50 comprising a first (left side) screen box 60 and second (right side) screen box 70 can be supported on top of baffles 14 and 20.
Screen systems 50, 60, 70 can be formed similar to screen systems shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,491,797 to Happel, which is incorporated by reference in its' entirety. The openings in the screens can range from approximately ⅛ of an inch to approximately 2 inches in diameter, and be either uniform diameters or combinations of different diameters as needed.
In front of the dual screen system 50 can be a flow spreader 10 having a height similar to the height of the dual screen system 50 and a bottom raised above the sloped floor 40. Along both sides of the flow spreader 50 can be an angled debris ramp 12 having a lower forward end spaced in front of the baffle 14 and rear upper end adjacent to the floor surface of each of the first (left side) screen box 60 and second (right side) screen box 70. Beneath the debris ramp 12 can be a downwardly angled screened deflector 13. The screened deflector 13 can have an upper forward end which forms a lip with the lower forward end of the debris ramp 12, and a rear lower end against the first baffle 14.
Between the top of first baffle 14 and the bottom of each of the first (left side) screen box 60 and second (right side) screen box 70 can be gap 15.
On a rear side of the first baffle 14 can be a deflector 16, and on a rear side of the second baffle 20 can be a deflector 22. Adjacent a rear end of each of the first (left side) screen box 60 and second (right side) screen box 70 can be a baffle skimmer 30. Against the inner wall of the baffle skimmer 30 between the rear ends of the first (left side) screen box 60 and second (right side) screen box 70, can be an oil boom cage 47 with oil booms 45 therein.
The oil booms 45 can include polymer treatment systems, such as those described in applicants parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/686,931 filed Aug. 25, 2017 to Happel, which is incorporated by reference in its' entirety.
The flow spreader 10 and deflectors 16, 22 can also be similar to those shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,666 to Happel, which is incorporated by reference in its' entirety.
Both the bottom ends of the first baffle 14 and the second baffle 20 can be directly mounted to the sloped floor 40 forming closed chambers between the inlet wall and the first baffle 14, and between the first baffle 14 and the second baffle 20.
Settling Chambers:
Referring to
The system 1 can have one or more baffles 16, 20 that span the width of the treatment vault. These baffles 16, 20 can divide the setting zone of the treatment system into distinct separate debris settling zones or chambers. The flow spreader 10 will be positioned within and above the first chamber. As stormwater flow enters the treatment system 1, the inflow opening 2 is above and adjacent to what will be described as the first chamber or setting zone. the second settling chamber. A baffle wall 14 that spans the width of the treatment vault can comprise the downstream side of the first settling chamber. This baffle wall 14 can also comprise the upstream side of a second settling chamber. With just one baffle wall 14 in position, the second chamber will have an upstream side wall defined by the downstream side of the baffle 14, the side walls 4 of the treatment vault, and the outflow end wall of the treatment vault.
If a second baffle 20 is inserted into the invention the two baffles 14, 20 will combine to form three distinct settling chambers. With the invention having 2 baffles, the second chamber is defined by the downstream side of the first baffle 14, the side walls 4 of the treatment vault, and the upstream side of the second baffle 20, and the third settling chamber is defined by the downstream side of the second baffle 20, the two side walls 4 of the treatment vault, and the outflow end adjacent to the outlet pipe/line 8 of the treatment vault.
As stormwater flow enters the stormwater treatment vault, the flow will spread wide within the vault and the linear velocity of the water flow will decrease. The cross-sectional area of the vault is significantly greater than that of the inflowing stormwater conveyance. The result of stormwater flow entering the vault is that the water flow will spread wide to approximately the width of the vault. A result of the water flow spreading wide within the treatment vault is that the linear velocity of the water flow is significantly reduced. Slowing the water velocity within the treatment vault will act to calm and reduce turbulence.
Gravity will act on solids entering the treatment vault such that the heavier than water solids will settle into the lower settling zone or zones. The settling zone or settling chamber of the treatment vault can be divided into separate zones or chambers by incorporating baffles 14, 20 that span the width of the treatment vault. Having multiple settling chambers can effectively increase the storage volume for captured debris. As debris settles below the flow line between the inflow and the outflow, and or below the tops of the baffles the turbulence of the water is reduce. The further the debris settles the more the turbulence is reduced. Typically, the depth of these settling chambers is such that debris has settled to a depth that is an adequate distance below the tops of the baffles such that debris will not re-suspend during high flow rain events. The settled debris is adequately separated from the turbulence between the inflow and outflow openings for the debris to not be able to scour and escape the treatment system 1.
Turbulence Deflectors:
Referring to
In the first settling chamber a deflector 12, that also serves as a debris ramp 12 to facilitate debris entering the debris separating screen systems 50, 60, 70, can be positioned adjacent to the bottom of the opening of the dual screen systems 50, 60, 70. This deflector 12 is generally angled downward from the inflow into the screen systems 50, 60, 70 and will serve to both reduce turbulence in the first chamber, and direct debris into the bodies of the debris separating screen systems 50, 60, 70. This deflector 12 will be positioned such that it fits between the flow spreader 10 and each sidewall 4 of the treatment vault, which will serve to direct debris into the screen systems 50, 60, 70. The deflector 13 can be attached, but not limited to, the screen system, to the baffle 14 below the screen system 50, 60, 70, to the side wall 4 of the treatment vault, to the flow spreader 10, or any combination of the before mentioned attachment locations.
In the second settling chamber a deflector 16 can be positioned adjacent to the top of the downstream side of the first baffle 14. This turbulence deflectors 12, 13 will serve to reduce turbulence by creating a back pressure within the settling chamber. As turbulence or water flow enter the second chamber the position of this deflector 16 will energy of the water flow will decrease, and debris will be able to settle.
If a second baffle 20 is added and there are 3 distinct settling chambers, a deflector 22 can be positioned adjacent to the top of the downstream side of the second baffle 20. This turbulence deflector 22 will serve to function similar to that of the deflector 16 in the second chamber.
The debris ramp 12 is intended to direct floatables into the dual screen systems 50, 60, 70. Although the debris ramp 12 and screened deflector 13 appear to have straight and angled, the ramp 12 and screened deflector 13 can have different surface shapes, such as but not limited to convex and concave. Also, the ramp 12 and deflector can be horizontal, vertical and the like.
Flow Spreader and Debris Capture Screen System:
Referring to
The debris capture screen systems 50, 60, 70 can be positioned above the top of the baffle 14 or baffles 14, 20, and adjacent to each side wall 4 of the treatment vault. As floating debris enters the stormwater treatment vault the flow spreader 10 can direct the water flow wide along with the floating debris, and the floating debris will enter the body of the debris capture screen system where the debris will remain until the treatment vault is serviced.
Referring to
Utilizing a flow spreader 10 made with a surface of screen has the advantage of being making more screen area available to avoid the potential for the screens becoming fully blinded. In addition, the water flow entering the treatment vault has adequate velocity to push debris off of the flow spreader 10, which prevents debris from accumulating on a screened flow spreader 10.
The use of louvered expanded screen can be especially effective with passing water without the potential for debris to blind the screen. The shape of the louvers is such that when water flows across the screen surface, solids are deflected over the hole in the screen toward the next hole where it is deflected again. The solids are repeatedly deflected downstream beyond each hole until they have entered the debris capture screen system or settled into the settling chambers of the treatment system. This louvered screen is highly effective and resistant to being blinded.
Another advantage gained by using a flow spreader 10 with a screened surface is the hydraulic pressure that is pressing solids against the screen in the debris capture systems is reduced. A common problem with debris and the screen systems that capture debris is the if the hydraulic pressure pressing the captured debris is adequately high enough, the captured debris can become jammed into the openings of the screen such that the screen becomes blinded and passes little to no water flow. In addition, once the captured debris is adequately jammed into the holes of a screen, the debris will not easily release from the screen after the rain event is over and the hgl recedes within the treatment system. The screens can become blinded without the volume of the screen system becoming close to full. Blinded screens within a treatment system will typically reduce the removal efficiency of pollutants of concern.
The debris capture screen system 50, 60, 70 can be made using any of the same types of materials and screen types that can be utilized to make the flow spreader 10. Although the debris capture screen systems 50, 60, 70 do not require screened lids, screen lids can be added. These added screened lids can be hinged such that access to the captured debris by a vacuum service truck can be more easily accomplished.
First Chamber Deflector and Debris Ramp:
Referring to
The shape and position of this screened barrier 13 can be such that it will be angled downward from the upstream edge of the first chamber deflector 12 and seal off against the baffle wall 14 and flow spreader 10. At this position the screened barrier 13 can have debris that can accumulate on the surface of the screen 13, pushed off by water flow that is moving along the surface of the flow spreader 10. The water flow will effectively clean the barrier screen 13 and prevent the barrier from becoming blinded by debris. Because the screened deflector 13 is angled adequately and attached to the upstream edge of the debris ramp 12, floating debris will not be able to accumulate under the debris ramp 12. In
The debris ramp 12 is intended to direct floatables into the dual screen systems 50, 60, 70. Although the debris ramp 12 and screened deflector 13 appear to have straight and angled, the ramp 12 and screened deflector 13 can have different surface shapes, such as but not limited to convex and concave. Also, the ramp 12 and deflector 13 can be horizontal, vertical and the like. As previously described, the debris ramp can have a solid surface or include openings, such as screened openings and the like.
Skimmer:
Referring to
Filtration media that is primarily specific to the capture of hydrocarbons can be utilized by positioning this media between the dual debris capture screen systems 50, 60, 70 and upstream from the skimmer 30. Hydrocarbon media can be placed inside of sleeves of fabric or netting to make booms 45. Then these booms 45 can then floated in front of the skimmer 30 or be placed inside of a cage 47 or containment screen to keep them in place. When servicing the treatment system these hydrocarbon booms 45 can be replaced.
Bypass Conveyance within the Invention:
Referring to
Referring to
1. The stormwater flow rates created by a rain event are great enough for the hgl within the stormwater treatment system to be above the specialized internal components.
2. The specialized interior components become substantially full of debris such that the debris inhibits flow through the specialized components.
3. A combination of both the stormwater flow rates created by a rain event being great enough, and the amount of debris within the treatment system adequate to inhibit flow.
4. The hgl of a receiving body of water becoming adequately elevated, whereby the hgl in the receiving body of water becomes conveyed into the stormwater treatment system. Such a condition is often referred to as the conveyance, which includes the treatment system, having a tailwater condition.
In general, when the hgl within a stormwater conveyance becomes adequately elevated, the functionality of the stormwater treatment system needs to have the capability to shift from stormwater treatment to flood prevention. The functional relationship between treatment and flood prevention is site and application specific criteria.
Second Embodiment, Includes First Embodiment with Media
Referring to
Filtration media 95 can be placed into the media vessel 90 between the skimmer baffle 30 and the outflow pipe 8. Types of filtration media 95 that can be used include but are not limited to those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,824,551; 7,955,507; 8,002,984; 8,002,985; and 8,153,005 to Wanielista et al., and in parent patent application Ser. No. 15/658,864 filed Jul. 25, 2017, to Happel, which are all incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The filtration media 95 can be contained within vessel 90 so that the water flow cannot dislodge the media and wash it down stream. Water flow can be diverted downward by the skimmer baffle 30, and then the water flow will upflow through the media 95 in the media vessel 90. As the water passes through the media sorbent surfaces, physical filtration, and biological activity will act to capture pollutants.
Upflow Filtration System:
Referring to
The system 80 can have a media filtration system 90/95 positioned between the skimmer 30 and the treatment vault outflow opening 8. At this location the water flow that reaches the filtration media 95 has been pretreated by settling chambers, screen systems 50, 60, 70, and oil filtration media 45. Because of the high level of pretreatment upstream from the filtration media 95, the filtration media 95 can last longer, flow more water, and require less servicing. The selection of the type of filtration media 95 that is applied is not limited and can depend on the type of pollutants being targeted.
The flow path of the stormwater within the system 80 is that the skimmer 30 can direct the water flow downward toward the underside of the filtration media chamber 90, water flow will then flow upwards through the filtration media 95, the pass through an upper screen system above the filtration media 95. A porous substructure will span approximately the entire underside of the media chamber, and the top cover of the filtration media chamber 90 can also be porous.
Third Embodiment, Includes First Embodiment with Hydroslide
Referring to
These types of hydroslide systems 10 shown in
Referring to
The use of this high pressure servicing system avoids the need for a service technician to enter the vault to perform servicing. The regulations set by OSHA for personnel to enter a confined space, such as a storm water treatment system for servicing, are complicated, time consuming, and costly.
Servicing the Invention:
Referring to
The vacuum truck will be able to access the dual debris capture screen systems with the service vacuum line. If there is a lid present across the tops of the screen system, this lid will be opened and the vacuum service line will be able to reach inside and the captured debris can be vacuumed out.
During servicing all the debris that has settled into the lower settling chamber or chambers will be removed by a vacuum service truck. There will be an opening between the dual screen systems that is adequately sized so that a vacuum service truck can access the lower settling chamber or chambers during servicing. The vacuum truck service line will be able to fit between the dual debris capture screen systems and reach to the bottom of the settling chambers. For servicing the first chamber, in which the flow spreader is located, the vacuum service line will be able to reach around the flow spreader to the floor of the chamber.
A vacuum truck and its associated service crew have an operating expense that is significant. In addition, the number of stormwater treatment systems that can be serviced by a vacuum truck and its crew is limited and dependent on the length of time spent doing each servicing. The greater the time it takes to perform the service work of the treatment system, the fewer treatment systems can be serviced in a day. Time translates into money if both the capitalization of the vacuum truck and the labor costs of the service crew. A vacuum truck and service crew that can service a greater number of stormwater treatment systems in a day will have a lower cost per servicing which can produce significant savings.
For the purpose of reducing servicing time, the invention can have a high-pressure spray system added to the settling zone of the treatment system. This spray system will consist of high-pressure pipe that conveys clean servicing water into the settling zone of treatment system. The conveyance of the servicing water is such that water is inserted at high-pressure from a source outside the vault of the treatment system, is conveyed to the bottom of the settling zone, where the servicing water flows into spray bars located along the perimeter of the settling zone. These spray bars have nozzles aimed toward the center of the settling and are approximately parallel with the floor of the settling zone.
Over time, solids will settle into the settling zone of the treatment system and form a layer across the bottom of the settling zone. When servicing using the spray system, the nozzles along the spray bars will jet servicing water at high velocity into the solids that have settled in the settling zone. These water jets will drill into the solids and liquefy the solids layer from the underside. The kinetic energy of the water jets will eventually drive the solids toward the center of the settling zone where the vacuum nozzle of the vacuum service truck can easily reach and extract the solids from the treatment system. To aid with driving the sediments toward the center of the settling zone, the floor of the settling zone can be angled such that the floor is sloped downward from the perimeter of the settling zone toward the center of the settling zone.
The invention can include a high-pressure servicing spray system for multiple settling zones. This will require a spray system for each settling zone or chamber. These spray systems will enable removing captured debris from the settling chambers quickly and easily, and without a service technician having to enter the treatment vault to facilitate servicing. Access to the bottom of the settling chambers, around the screen systems and flow spreader, will be attained by a vacuum service truck. All the debris can easily be removed from the settling zone of the treatment system. Without the servicing spray system certain areas in the settling zone may be difficult a vacuum service truck to access. It is common that when a service technician has difficulties doing the work, the technician may not do a complete job, resulting in debris being left behind in the treatment vault.
The before described method of using a high-pressure spray system to aid with the removal of solids that have settled into the settling zone of a treatment system will achieve the following results:
Referring to
Fifth Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Large Flow Spreader
Referring to
The large flow spreader 210 can have a tip end closer to the front inflow inlet 2 than to the first baffle 14. Also, the large flow spreader 210 can have a bottom attached to the floor 40, while the other flow spreader 10 as a bottom spaced above the floor 40. The operation of the system 200 can function similar to the previous embodiments in flow.
A large flow spreader 210 can have a tip end extending more than halfway between the first baffle and inlet wall. The larger the flow spreader, the less headloss that can occur.
The large flow spreader 210 can have a solid surface or a surface with openings, such as screened openings, and the like. The screened surface can allow filtering out of debris, and the like from passing into the dual screen systems 50, 60, 70.
The larger the flow spreader 210, reduces the chances of solids, debris, passing therethrough.
Sixth Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Large Flow Spreader & Hydroslide
Referring to
Seventh Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Convex Large Flow Spreader
Eighth Embodiment Includes First Embodiment with Concave Large Flow Spreader
There are at least eighteen (18) problems solved by the invention:
However, because the screens are elevated above the static water level, it is possible this debris may not enter the screen systems and remain in the static water level within the first chamber. If this debris is unable to enter the screen systems and remain in the first chamber, this debris may sink and over time pollutants therein will leach into the water. When it rains again at a later date, these pollutants would be conveyed with the water flow out of the treatment system and into a receiving body of water.
Sediment in a settling zone forms a layer that covers the bottom of the settling zone, and the sediments can tightly pack together and become hard. It can be very difficult for a service crew to remove these tightly packed sediments from the setting zone. The longer it takes for a service crew to perform the servicing of the treatment system, the more money it costs to perform the servicing and the longer servicing equipment is engaged to a single task.
A comparison between the subject invention and previous patents of the applicant will now be discussed:
Although specific advantages have been enumerated above, various embodiments may include some, none, or all of the enumerated advantages.
Other technical advantages may become readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art after review of the following figures and description.
It should be understood at the outset that, although exemplary embodiments are illustrated in the figures and described below, the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or not. The present disclosure should in no way be limited to the exemplary implementations and techniques illustrated in the drawings and described below.
Unless otherwise specifically noted, articles depicted in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Modifications, additions, or omissions may be made to the systems, apparatuses, and methods described herein without departing from the scope of the disclosure. For example, the components of the systems and apparatuses may be integrated or separated. Moreover, the operations of the systems and apparatuses disclosed herein may be performed by more, fewer, or other components and the methods described may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order. As used in this document, “each” refers to each member of a set or each member of a subset of a set.
To aid the Patent Office and any readers of any patent issued on this application in interpreting the claims appended hereto, applicants wish to note that they do not intend any of the appended claims or claim elements to invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f) unless the words “means for” or “step for” are explicitly used in the particular claim.
While the invention has been described, disclosed, illustrated and shown in various terms of certain embodiments or modifications which it has presumed in practice, the scope of the invention is not intended to be, nor should it be deemed to be, limited thereby and such other modifications or embodiments as may be suggested by the teachings herein are particularly reserved especially as they fall within the breadth and scope of the claims here appended.
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/639,685 filed Jun. 30, 2017, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/506,188 filed May 15, 2017, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/639,685 is a Continuation In Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/288,455 filed May 28, 2014, now abandoned, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/828,958 filed May 30, 2013. The entire disclosure of each of the applications listed in this paragraph are incorporated herein by specific reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
122209 | Ashman | Dec 1871 | A |
232948 | Dernham | Oct 1880 | A |
587559 | Riley | Aug 1897 | A |
664945 | Guion | Jan 1901 | A |
783556 | Van Buskirk | Feb 1905 | A |
809201 | Lutz | Jan 1906 | A |
920961 | Keil | May 1909 | A |
1060338 | Gschwind | Apr 1913 | A |
1442348 | McDermet | Jan 1923 | A |
1935642 | Laughlin | Nov 1933 | A |
2010540 | Evans | Aug 1935 | A |
2102310 | Egan | Dec 1937 | A |
2182795 | Day | Dec 1939 | A |
2263259 | Boosey | Nov 1941 | A |
2360961 | Mayo | Oct 1944 | A |
2436793 | Danel | Mar 1948 | A |
2485755 | Loosli | Oct 1949 | A |
2559784 | Moore | Jul 1951 | A |
2615526 | Lane | Oct 1952 | A |
2652946 | Beatty | Sep 1953 | A |
2796988 | Loffler | Jun 1957 | A |
3091339 | Marra et al. | May 1963 | A |
3237915 | Palmer et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3282430 | Kinne | Nov 1966 | A |
3527348 | Lalonde et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3631983 | Jan 1972 | A | |
4024881 | Weiland | May 1977 | A |
4070863 | Brown | Jan 1978 | A |
4189386 | Aman | Feb 1980 | A |
4198717 | Kessel | Apr 1980 | A |
4278190 | Oory et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4297219 | Kirk et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4308141 | Clendenen | Dec 1981 | A |
4326952 | Blake | Apr 1982 | A |
4422931 | Wolde-Michael | Dec 1983 | A |
4509717 | Wright et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4668405 | Boze | May 1987 | A |
4689145 | Mathews et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4738644 | Happel | Apr 1988 | A |
4765889 | Grujanac | Aug 1988 | A |
4785966 | Waltke | Nov 1988 | A |
4895653 | Cherochak | Jan 1990 | A |
4913819 | Patterson | Apr 1990 | A |
5034122 | Wiesemann | Jul 1991 | A |
5037541 | Ruey-Jang et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5069781 | Wilkes | Dec 1991 | A |
5114274 | Heiler | May 1992 | A |
5133619 | Murfae et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5176838 | Chin | Jan 1993 | A |
5232587 | Hegemier et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5284580 | Shyh | Feb 1994 | A |
5372714 | Logue, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378376 | Zenner | Jan 1995 | A |
5397464 | Hannon | Mar 1995 | A |
5403474 | Emery | Apr 1995 | A |
5405539 | Schneider | Apr 1995 | A |
5480254 | Autry et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486287 | Murphy et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498331 | Monteith | Mar 1996 | A |
5518024 | Weeks et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535554 | Harris, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5562819 | Turner, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575925 | Logue, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5632889 | Tharp | May 1997 | A |
5643445 | Billias et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5670039 | Harris | Sep 1997 | A |
5779888 | Bennett | Jul 1998 | A |
5810510 | Urriola | Sep 1998 | A |
5820762 | Bamer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5855774 | Boelter | Jan 1999 | A |
5904842 | Billias et al. | May 1999 | A |
5980740 | Harms et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985157 | Leckner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6032421 | Yamada | Mar 2000 | A |
6077448 | Tran-Quoc-Nam et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086756 | Roy | Jul 2000 | A |
6086758 | Schilling et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099743 | Pedersen | Aug 2000 | A |
6106706 | Roy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106707 | Morris et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125865 | Bacon Cochrane | Oct 2000 | A |
6149803 | Diloreto, Jr. et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6178565 | Franco | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190545 | Williamson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200484 | McInnis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231758 | Morris et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270663 | Happel | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287459 | Williamson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294095 | Lewis | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315897 | Maxwell | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334953 | Singleton | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6379541 | Nicholas | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428692 | Happel | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6478954 | Turner, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517709 | Cardwell et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531059 | Morris et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537446 | Sanguinetti | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6551023 | Allard | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562233 | Schilling et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6638424 | Stever et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6651825 | Turner, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666974 | Page | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668390 | Gonzalez | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6733665 | Khalil | May 2004 | B1 |
6797161 | Use et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797162 | Happel | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800195 | Batten et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6824677 | Martinez | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6866153 | Turner, Jr. et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6869525 | Happel | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6872029 | Allard et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6884343 | Harris et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6936163 | Use et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939461 | Use et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951607 | Use et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974540 | Fleischmann | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976808 | Allard | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979148 | Happel et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986621 | Allard | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994783 | Use et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6998039 | Harris et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005060 | Pitt | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011743 | Use et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7083721 | McClure et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094337 | Williams et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7094338 | Morris et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112274 | Sanguinetti | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7128341 | Dahl et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7128832 | Wade | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132045 | Trangsrud | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7153417 | Happel | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156987 | Sanguinetti | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7270747 | Happel et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7282142 | Kraft | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7288188 | Al-Assfour | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294256 | Happel et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309420 | Trangsrud | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7328809 | Gigas et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7396471 | Wimberger | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7488414 | Wimberger | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494585 | Nino | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7524414 | Barragan | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7549820 | Happel | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7658857 | Wacome | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7662280 | Cooney | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7771591 | Lucas | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785464 | Happel | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815800 | Komatsu | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824551 | Wanielista et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846327 | Happel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7883620 | Owen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7897047 | Wanielista et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7927484 | Wanielista et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7955507 | Wanielista et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959799 | Happel et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7981283 | Happel | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981300 | Wacome | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002984 | Wanielista et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8002985 | Wanielista et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8017006 | Lopez | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034234 | Happel | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8034236 | Happel | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8034237 | Happel et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8038879 | Kraft | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051568 | Moody et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083937 | Happel | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8101079 | Wanielista et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8142666 | Happel | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8153005 | Wanielista et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8216453 | Moody et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8221632 | McInnis et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231780 | Happel | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8252182 | Chang et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8366923 | Happel | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8393827 | Happel | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8425150 | Happel | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8491797 | Happel | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8622652 | Happel | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8651767 | Happel | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8658044 | Cobb | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8974144 | Happel | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9068312 | Happel | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9340965 | Happel | May 2016 | B2 |
9534368 | Happel | Jan 2017 | B1 |
20010047954 | Happel | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030026659 | Wu | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030089652 | Matsui | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121846 | Use et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132150 | Happel | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030136717 | Tseng | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172487 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030175079 | Happel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040065601 | Martinez | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040222159 | Peters, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040222170 | Hauge | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226869 | McClure et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050051499 | Nino | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050069386 | Happel et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050183997 | Happel et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050218049 | Happel | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060016767 | Olson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060086676 | Smith | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060096935 | Harding | May 2006 | A1 |
20060163130 | Happel et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060201860 | Happel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060207922 | Dussich | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080006304 | Treherne | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090045135 | Khudenko et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090114579 | Dyer | May 2009 | A1 |
20090134081 | Happel | May 2009 | A1 |
20090166279 | Happel et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100032363 | Happel | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100078370 | Happel | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110168612 | Happel | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110278237 | McInnis | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120073675 | Dupuis | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140102479 | Steffen | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140352729 | Happel | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150114893 | Moll | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150129473 | Kent | May 2015 | A1 |
20150183659 | Kent | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150258472 | Kent | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170342698 | Fink | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2455239 | Jul 2005 | CA |
2004353407 | Dec 2004 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Rising and Non-Rising Stem, Telescoping Valves, Halliday Products, retrieved on Jun. 15, 2009, retrieved from www.hallidayproducts.com/ssg.html, 4 pages. |
Aluminum Slide and Weir Glass, Water and Waste Water Valves and Gates, retrieved on Jun. 15, 2009, retrieved from http://ncvg.net/products/alumslideweir.html, 10 pages. |
Happel, Utility U.S. Appl. No. 14/151,284, filed Jan. 9, 2014, Office Action Summary dated Dec. 24, 2014, 12 pages. |
Applied Polymer Systems, Inc., Polymer Enhanced Best Management Practice (PEBMP) Application Guide, Revised 2016, 83 pages. |
Technical Guidance for the Use of Polyacrylamides (PAM) and PAM Blends for Soil Erosion Control and Storm Water Clarification, Applied Polymer Systems, Inc., Nov. 2002, 8 pages. |
Applied Polymer Systems, Inc., APS 800 Series Pond Long, retrieved from http://siltstop.com/p.php?go=pinfo&PID=333-aps_800_series_pond_log, retrieved Aug. 28, 2017, 3 pages. |
Applied Polymer Systems, Inc., Water Treatment, retrieved from http://siltstop.com/p.php?go=pinfo&PID=15-water_treatment, retrieved on Aug. 28, 2017, 8 pages. |
Stormwater Best Management Practice, Polymer Flocculation, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Oct. 2013, http://www.siltstop.com/pictures/US_EPA_Polymer_Flocculant_Handout_3-14.pdf, 7 pages. |
Happel, T., Utility U.S. Appl. No. 15/639,685, filed Jun. 30, 2017, Office Action Summary dated Aug. 10, 2018, 7 pages. |
Happel, T., Utility U.S. Appl. No. 15/248,202, filed Aug. 26, 2016, Office Action Summary dated Jun. 1, 2018, 10 pages. |
Spantek, Expanded Metal, Expanded Metal Patterns, no date available, 4 pages. |
Bioclean, Debris Separating Baffle Box, Dual Stage Hydrodynamic Separator, no date available, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62506188 | May 2017 | US | |
61828958 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15639685 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 16104737 | US | |
Parent | 14288455 | May 2014 | US |
Child | 15639685 | US |