Shoplifting is a problem that plagues retailers. In order to combat shoplifting, retailers have demanded antitheft devices or security devices be placed on the consumer products they sell. This has, however, caused many manufacturers to carry a plurality of inventories of the identical product. This is because of the plurality antitheft technologies currently in use in market place, and because some products do not carry any antitheft device and there is no need to expend money equipping these products with antitheft devices.
For example, a manufacturer makes product A and places a first type of antitheft device on it for a first retailer, said first security device compatible with the security system in use at the business of the first retailer. Then, for a second retailer having a different type of security system, the manufacturer must use a second type of antitheft device in connection with product A that is different from the first antitheft device, yet compatible with the security system in use at the business of the second retailer. Additionally, the manufacturer must carry product A without any antitheft devices for a third retailer who has no security system and thus does not want to pay the added expense associated with antitheft devices.
Thus, these product manufacturers must maintain their inventories at certain levels to facilitate customer demand, which leads to multiple inventories of identical products. This is very costly to the manufacturer because of the time and energy which must be expended in keeping track of the plurality of inventories of the same product A and additionally there are significant expenses incurred in storing the inventories of the same product.
It would be desirable to have a security device that solves the problem manufacturers have associated with carrying and storing multiple inventories of the identical product. It would also be desirable if the security device was easy to use and inexpensive to manufacture.
The present invention is for a dual security label. The dual security label comprises a cover stock body comprising a first side and a second side. The dual security label further comprises an adhesive that has been applied to the second side of the cover stock body. Two antitheft devices are adhered to the adhesive. These antitheft devices are an acousto-magnetic (AM) antitheft device and a radio frequency (RF) antitheft device. The AM antitheft device and RF antitheft device cannot touch one another and are separated by a distance of about 0.25 inches or more. Interference becomes problematic if the AM antitheft device and RF antitheft device touch or if the distance between them is less than about 0.25 inches. In addition, a radio frequency identification device may be substituted for one of the antitheft devices or used in combination with the two antitheft devices. The radio frequency identification device should not contact the radio frequency antitheft device or acousto-magnetic antitheft device.
The dual security label is made by the following process:
a) a release liner or web made of polyester or other suitable material is provided,
b) one side of the release liner or web is the silicone side and has a silicone coating and the other side of the release liner is the metallized side and has a metallized coating,
c) antitheft sensors or devices (acousto-magnetic antitheft devices and radio frequency antitheft devices) and/or radio frequency identification sensors are applied to the silicone side, such that when the cover stock is applied the sensors will release from the web liner and travel with the cover stock when being applied to the finished product,
d) the metallized coating on the metallized side of the release liner is used for grounding the web so that static electricity does not build up which could be problematic for the radio frequency antitheft devices,
e) the antitheft devices and/or sensors are laid in a pattern on the silicone coating on the silicone side of the release liner so that they can be applied to a finished retail product, and in particular the acousto-magnetic antitheft device and radio frequency antitheft device do not touch one another and are separated from one another by a distance of about 0.25 inches or more,
f) the two antitheft devices travel down the release liner web and a cover stock having a one side self adhesive is applied over the sensors and release liner with the adhesive layer second side of the cover stock being applied on top of the sensors and the web,
g) the web then travels over a rotary cutting device that cuts the cover stock without cutting the release web,
h) the web and cover stock travel to a rewind wheel which rolls the release web carrying the dual security labels onto a roll format making the dual security labels ready for production,
i) the finished product is a roll of the release liner with about 5,000 dual security labels having the cover stock applied to them, and
j) the roll of dual security labels is used in an automatic application process wherein the cover stock carries/pulls the sensors off the release liner and onto a finished manufactured product to which the dual security label is to be applied. It is noted that because the adhesive of the cover stock is strong enough to pull the sensors off the silicone coating on the silicone side of the release liner the security labels are maintained in correct format to be applied to the finished product.
In another embodiment, a triple security label is provided for that includes an acousto-magnetic antitheft device, a radio frequency antitheft device, and a radio frequency identification device. Here, the assembly process includes the additional step of applying the radio frequency identification device to the silicone coating on the silicone side of the release liner.
In other embodiments an enclosing member is provided. The enclosing member has a first and second side, and the first side is coated with an adhesive. The enclosing member is adhered to the stock enclosing member, such that the first antitheft device and second antitheft device are positioned between or sandwiched between the enclosing member and cover stock body.
The dual security label does away with the need for manufactures to keep multiple inventories. The manufactured receives an order from a retailer that has a known security system. All the manufacture needs to do is run the product through deactivation machines that deactivate one of the security devices, while keeping the security device required for the particular retailer active. This deactivation can be readily accomplished in deactivation machines.
Thus, the manufacturer only needs to keep one inventory, and as a result the costs and expenses associated with maintaining multiple inventories is no longer problematic for the manufacturer.
This invention is illustrated in the drawings in which like reference numbers designate the same or similar parts.
Turning to
The second side 34 of the cover stock body 30 is coated with an adhesive 36. Adhesives are well known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
The antitheft devices, commonly designated 48 throughout the figures, are adhered to the adhesive 36, as shown in
One of the antitheft sensors or devices 48 is an acousto-magnetic (AM) antitheft device 50 (hereinafter AM antitheft device 50) and the other antitheft device or sensor 48 is a radio frequency (RF) antitheft device 52 (hereinafter RF antitheft device 52. Also, the present invention provides for a radio frequency identification (RFID) device or sensor 56 (hereinafter RFID sensor 56) that has a chip 58 for storing information, as shown in
There is a specific relationship between the spacing between the AM antitheft device 50 and RF antitheft device 52. First, the AM antitheft device 50 and RF antitheft device 52 cannot touch one when used in the dual security label 20. In particular, the AM antitheft device 50 and RF antitheft device 52 need to be spaced from one another by a distance of about a 0.25 inches or more when they are used in the dual security label 20. In
In use, the manufacturer may receive an order from one of the retailers it distributes product to, and the retailer may have an acousto-magnetic (AM) security system and may thus require the products it sells to be equipped with acousto-magnetic (AM) antitheft devices 50. All the manufacturer needs to do is deactivate the radio frequency (RF) antitheft devices 52 that are adhered to the adhesive 36 on the second side 34 of the cover stock body 30 by use of a deactivation machines. Such deactivation machines are well known to those having ordinary skill in the art. Then, the manufacturer ships the product having activated acousto-magnetic antitheft (AM) devices 50 to the retailer.
Or, the manufacturer may receive an order from a different retailer that it distributes product to, and this retailer may have a radio frequency (RF) security system that requires the products it sells to be equipped with radio frequency (RF) antitheft devices 52. All the manufacturer needs to do is deactivate the acousto-magnetic antitheft devices 50 in a deactivation machine. Such deactivation machines are well known to those having ordinary skill in the art. Then, the manufacture can ship the product having radio frequency (RF) antitheft devices 52 to the retailer.
The dual security label 20 may be attached to a product in a plurality of manners. At the most basic level, the dual security label 20 may be sold as a single label 20, and the user peels the dual security label 20 off a removable backing. The removable backing is made of a material that does not bond to adhesives, such materials known to those having ordinary skill in the art. The user then manually places (sticks) the dual security label 20 on the product to be sold. A plurality of dual security labels 20 may also be sold on sheets, and the user simple peels off the dual security labels 20 from the backing and applies them to products as desired. There may be perhaps thirty labels 20 on each sheet. Or, the dual security labels 20 may be sold on rolls or festoons, each having hundreds or thousands of labels 20. The rolls or festoons could be used for the automatic application of dual security labels 20 on the customer's or vendor's product line, as shown in
Finally, the process of making the dual security label 20 and applying the dual security labels 20 can be entirely automated, as shown in the diagrammatic view of
Production begins with a roll of release liner or web 122. The release liner or web 122 can be made of polyester or other suitable material known to those skilled in the art. A silicone side 124 of the release liner or web 122 has a silicon coating 126, and a metallized side 128 of the release liner 124 has metallized coating 130. Antitheft sensors or devices 48 (acousto-magnetic antitheft devices and radio frequency antitheft devices) and/or radio frequency identification devices are applied to the silicone side 124. It is noted that the metallized coating 130 on the release liner 122 is used for grounding the release liner or web 122 so that static electricity does not build up which could be problematic. For example, build up static electricity can cause shorts in the RF antitheft device 52, but the grounded metallized coating 130 prevents such short circuits. Thus, the metallized coating 130 is used for grounding and used for preventing electrical damage.
The antitheft devices 48 are automatically laid in a pattern on the silicone side 124 of the release liner 122 so that they can be applied to a finished retail product. A first sensor application machine 132 applies the acousto-magnetic antitheft device 52 on the silicone side 124 and a second sensor application machine 134 applies the radio frequency antitheft device 52 to the silicone side 124. The first and second sensor application machines 132,134 respectively, apply the acousto-magnetic antitheft device 50 and radio frequency antitheft device 52 on the silicone side 124 of the release line 122 such that they are spaced a distance of about 0.25 inches from one another. Sensor application machines are commercially available and known to those having ordinary skill in the art. The two antitheft devices 48 travel down the release liner web 122. A roll of cover stock 150 having an adhesive layer and from which the cover stock bodies 30 will be cut is applied over the antitheft devices 48 and over the release liner 122. Also, a low adhesive sheet 150b is removed from the roll of cover stock 150 by a low adhesive sheet removal machine 150a to thus expose the adhesive on the roll of cover stock 150.
The web 122 travels over a rotary cutting machine 152 that cuts the cover stock 150 without cutting the release web 122. Rotary cutting machines are known to those having ordinary skill in the art. The web 122 and cover stock 150 then travel to a rewind wheel 154 that rolls the release web 122, which is carrying the antitheft devices 48, onto a roll format 156 making the dual security labels 20 ready for vendors to apply the dual security labels 20. Rewind machines known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
The finished product is a roll 156 has about 5,000 dual security labels 20 having the cover stock bodies 30 applied to them. As shown in
Of course, in the above-described assembly process, it is noted that either of the antitheft devices 48 could be replaced with a RFID sensor 56, and the same process as described above followed could be followed to attach them to the web liner 122.
Thus, by attaching two different antitheft devices 48 to the adhesive layer second side 42 the manufacturer can activate and deactivate the desired antitheft device 48 before shipment to each retail store. Hence, by use of the dual security label 20, the manufacturer no longer has to maintain costly multiple inventories.
The manufacturer can then use this dual security label 20 and attach it to the product it is shipping to various retailers. An illustrative example of use of the dual security label 20 is shown in connection with a digital video disc (hereinafter DVD) case 60 as shown in
In another embodiment, shown in
In yet another embodiment, shown in
Also, in another embodiment, shown in
Then, after the enclosing member 46 has been adhered to the cover stock body 30, the covered dual security label 20a or covered triple security label 100a can be deposited in the packaging used in connection with the products being sold.
It is noted that the cover stock body 30 and enclosing member 46 can comprise paper, fabric, coated paper products, woven fabrics, nonwoven fabrics, plastics, polyethylene and polyethylene films, and polyester and polyester blends, blown polyester, and combinations thereof, all of which allow the antitheft devices 48 to be carried thereon. Also, both the cover stock body 30 and enclosing member 46, respectively, are designed to carry a print that allows the end user to either disguise the covered dual security label 20a or covered triple security label 100a or to carry other information, such as a UPC (universal pricing code) directing the retailer where the covered dual security label 20a or covered triple security label 100a is embedded. Additionally, manufacturers can configure their product lines such that the covered dual and triple security labels, 20a, 100a, respectively, automatically drop into the product packaging.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that while dual security label has been described above in connection with particular embodiments and examples, the dual security label is not necessarily so limited and other embodiments, examples, uses, and modifications and departures from the embodiments, examples, and uses may be made without departing from the dual security label. All of these embodiments are intended to be within the scope and spirit of the this dual security label.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 60/461,238 to Reid et al., filed on Apr. 8, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4151405 | Peterson | Apr 1979 | A |
4581524 | Hoekman et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4626311 | Taylor | Dec 1986 | A |
4717438 | Benge et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5392028 | Pichl | Feb 1995 | A |
5406263 | Tuttle | Apr 1995 | A |
5495250 | Ghaem et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5583489 | Loemker et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5614278 | Chamberlain et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5859587 | Alicot et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5939984 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5982284 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6121878 | Brady et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6154137 | Goff et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6369711 | Adams et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404341 | Reid | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6603399 | Ruhrig | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6690279 | Ruhrig et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
20040233042 | Piccoli et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 23 883 | Jan 1995 | DE |
0 446 910 | Sep 1991 | EP |
2 701 146 | Feb 1993 | EP |
0 858 061 | Aug 1998 | EP |
2 701 146 | Mar 1993 | FR |
2 310 977 | Sep 1997 | GB |
WO 9914717 | Mar 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040201478 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60461238 | Apr 2003 | US |