1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates, generally, to pressure chambers. More particularly, the invention relates to Stirling engines with a dual shell pressure chamber.
2. Background Information
The maximum Stirling engine efficiency is related to the Carnot efficiency which is governed by the ratio of maximum working fluid temperature relative to the minimum fluid temperature. Improvements in technologies which increase the margin between the two temperature extremes is beneficial in terms of total cycle efficiency. The lower working fluid temperature is typically governed by the surrounding air or water temperature; which is used as a cooling source. The main area of improvements result from an increase in the maximum working temperature. The maximum temperature is governed by the materials which are used for typical Stirling engines. The materials, typically high strength Stainless Steel alloys, are exposed to both high temperature and high pressure. The high pressure is due to the Stirling engines requirement of obtaining useful power output for a given engine size. Stirling engines can operate between 50 to 200 atmospheres internal pressure for high performance engines.
Since Stirling engines are closed cycle engines, heat must travel through the container materials to get into the working fluid. These materials typically are made as thin as possible to maximize the heat transfer rates. The combination of high pressures and temperatures has limited Stirling engine maximum temperatures to around 800° C. Ceramic materials have been investigated as a technique to allow higher temperatures, however their brittleness and high cost have made them difficult to implement.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,611,201, to Houtman, shows an advanced Stirling engine based on Stainless Steel technology. This engine has the high temperature components exposed to the large pressure differential which limits the maximum temperature to the 800° C. range. U.S. Pat. No. 5,388,410, to Momose et al., shows a series of tubes, labeled part number 22 a through d, exposed to the high temperatures and pressures. The maximum temperature is limited by the combined effects of the temperature and pressure on the heating tubes. U.S. Pat. No. 5,383,334 to Kaminiishizono et al, again shows heater tubes, labeled part number 18, which are exposed to the large temperature and pressure differentials. U.S. Pat. No. 5,433,078, to Shin, also shows the heater tubes, labeled part number 1, exposed to the large temperature and pressure differentials. U.S. Pat. No. 5,555,729, to Momose et al., uses a flattened tube geometry for the heater tubes, labeled part number 15, but is still exposed to the large temperature and pressure differential. The flat sides of the tube add additional stresses to the tubing walls. U.S. Pat. No. 5,074,114, to Meijer et al., also shows the heater pipes exposed to high temperatures and pressures.
The Stirling engine disclosed in the inventor's U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,598 overcomes the limitations and shortcomings of the above prior art by providing a dual shell pressure chamber. An inner shell surrounds the heat transfer tubing and the regenerator. The portion surrounding the heat transfer tubing contains a thermally conductive liquid metal to facilitate heat transfer from a heat source to the heat transfer tubing and also to transmit external pressure to the heat transfer tubing. An outer shell that acts as a pressure vessel surrounds the inner shell and contains a thermally insulating liquid between the inner and outer shells. Pressure of the working fluid as it flows through the regenerator is transmitted through the inner shell to the insulating liquid and back across the inner shell to the liquid metal surrounding the heat transfer tubing. This system tends to balance the pressure across the heat transfer tubing and the inner shell, thereby allowing the engine to operate with the working fluid at a high pressure to generate significant power while keeping the wall of the heat transfer tubing thin to facilitate heat transfer.
The preferred material for the insulating liquid is a salt or glass such as Boron Anhydride or a mixture of Boron Anhydride and Bismuth Oxide. Those materials are fairly viscous when liquid, but still allow significant convection currents. A filler material such as ceramic fiber or similar material is placed in the liquid salt region to minimize convective currents. While this can work very well to transmit and balance the pressure across the inner shell and across the heat transfer tubing, combining the filler material and the liquid salt and installing it between the shells in a manner that does not produce voids can be difficult. Also, before the salt melts it does not transmit pressure. Therefore, significant preheating must be done to thoroughly melt the salt before the engine can be run with significant pressure in the working fluid.
The present invention improves on the dual shell pressure chamber and overcomes the difficulties in using the insulating liquid between the shells by using gas instead of a liquid.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,598 granted Mar. 28, 2000, and hereby incorporated by reference, discloses a dual shell pressure chamber as used with a Stirling engine. Referring to
The inner shell 30 surrounds the heat transfer tubing 14 and regenerator 16. The upper portion 32 of inner shell 30 contains a liquid metal region 34 filled with a thermally conductive liquid metal, such as silver, which surrounds the heat transfer tubing 14. The regenerator 16 is preferably a coiled annulus of thin material disposed between cylinder 10 and inner shell 30. Outer shell 40 surrounds inner shell 30 and acts as a pressure vessel. The inner shell 30, outer shell 40 and flange 36 bound a pressure backup region 42. The pressure backup region is filled with a material to provide pressure backup against inner shell 30 and consequently through liquid metal region 34 to heat transfer tubing 14. It is also desirable that the pressure backup region 42 contain an insulating material 44, as depicted in
As an alternative to using an insulating liquid in the pressure backup region 42, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,598, the present invention uses a gas, preferably the same gas as the working fluid, such as helium, in the pressure backup region 42, preferably in conjunction with the insulating material 44 such as carbon fiber mat or cloth, or ceramic fiber mat or cloth. In the alternative a lower conductivity gas such as Argon could be used as long as the gas in the backup region is not allowed to mix with the working fluid in cylinder 10. The insulating material 44 prevents significant convection current flow in the gas, thereby significantly reducing heat transfer through pressure backup region 42 as would occur with the use of gas alone. Since the gas is compressible, it does not transmit pressure like a liquid, so it will not transfer the transient pressure from the working fluid in the regenerator 16 to the liquid metal region 34, and consequently to the heat transfer tubing 14, like the liquid will when the engine is running. However, the gas does provide a fairly uniform backup pressure against the outside of the inner shell 30 which is transmitted to the liquid metal region 34 and consequently to the heat transfer tubing 14.
During engine operation with a heat source of approximately 2000 degrees F., pressure fluctuates inside cylinder 10 over a range of approximately 1000 psi during each cycle of the power piston 12. By pressurizing pressure backup region 42 to a desired amount, inner shell 30 and heat transfer tubing 14 can see only tensile, only compressive, or a combination tensile and compressive load. For example if the nominal pressure of the working fluid inside cylinder 10 is 1000 psi, during operation the pressure will range between 500 and 1500 psi. If the pressure in backup region 42 is set at 1500 psi, shell 30 and heat transfer tubing 14 see only a 0–1000 psi compressive load. This may be desirable to prevent any tensile cracking from occurring in those structures. In that case shell 30 may be compressed against regenerator 16 which may detrimentally effect the regenerator. Alternatively, the backup pressure may be set at 500 psi such that shell 30 and heat transfer tubing see only a 0–1000 psi tensile load, thus preventing any compression of shell 30 against the regenerator, but requiring shell 30 and heat transfer tubing 14 to have sufficient tensile strength. Setting the backup pressure at 1000 psi results in a ±500 psi tensile and compressive load across shell 30 and heat transfer tubing 14. The inventor believes this is the best mode of operation because it subjects the structures to the lowest absolute load.
Using the gas pressure backup in this manner, the pressure of the working fluid can be raised to any desirable level to produce significant power in the engine while the loads on the heat transfer tubing 14 and the inner shell 30 are kept low. The upper bounds of the pressure is limited only by safety and manufacturing considerations for the outer shell 40 and the lower housing 22, which function as a pressure vessel against the atmosphere. Lower housing 22 can be designed to enclose an electrical generator connected to the output shaft 43 of the dual shell Stirling engine, thereby eliminating the need for any external high-pressure seal against a rotating shaft extending through the lower housing.
Referring also to
As pointed out above, the gas backup provides a fairly uniform backup pressure which is of advantage if the pressure in the region 42 were to track pressure in the regenerator region 16. As also mentioned, the aperture 50 allows an averaging of pressures during each cycle of the engine. As the size of the hole 50 increases, the pressures start to match. This is a favorable condition for stresses in the material but is detrimental to engine power which drops as more and more flow goes in and out of the port 50 with each stroke.
Because the backup pressure region 42 or region 48, the working fluid area inside cylinder 10, and the working fluid reservoir in inner area 24 of lower housing are all in fluid communication, the overall average pressure in all these areas may be adjusted upward or downward, such as through a single port in the lower housing, while the engine is running.
The descriptions above and the accompanying drawings should be interpreted in the illustrative and not the limited sense. While the invention has been disclosed in connection with the preferred embodiment or embodiments thereof, it should be understood that there may be other embodiments which fall within the scope of the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US02/22009 | 7/12/2002 | WO | 00 | 1/13/2004 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO03/006812 | 1/23/2003 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3344894 | Kenworthy | Oct 1967 | A |
| 3949554 | Noble et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3991457 | Barton | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4013117 | Kopetzki et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4052854 | du Pre et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4055951 | Davoud et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4093435 | Marron et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4174616 | Nederlof et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4200441 | Honmann et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4214447 | Barton | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4235116 | Meijer et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4382452 | Loveless | May 1983 | A |
| 4405010 | Schwartz | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4425764 | Lam | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4429732 | Moscrip | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4607424 | Johnson | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4625514 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4638633 | Otters | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4662176 | Fujiwara et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4722188 | Otters | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4723410 | Otters | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4742679 | Inoda et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4774808 | Otters | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4799421 | Bremer et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4815290 | Dunstan | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4832118 | Scanlon et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4869212 | Sverdlin | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4887793 | Hernandez et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4894989 | Mizuno et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 5074114 | Meijer et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5140905 | Dhar | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5217681 | Wedellsborg et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5242015 | Saperstein et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5339653 | DeGregoria | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5355679 | Pierce | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5383334 | Kaminishizono et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5388410 | Momose et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5429177 | Yaron et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5433078 | Shin | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5465781 | DeGregoria | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5555729 | Momose et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5611201 | Houtman | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5715683 | Hofbauer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 6041598 | Bliesner | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6230607 | Rehrl et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6263671 | Bliesner | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6293101 | Conrad | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6311491 | Conrad | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6347453 | Mitchell | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6389811 | Urasawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6526750 | Bliesner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 20010042373 | Bliesner et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20040168438 | Bliesner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2519869 | Nov 1976 | DE |
| 0220622 | Oct 1986 | EP |
| WO 8200320 | Feb 1982 | WO |
| WO 9825008 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040168438 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60304924 | Jul 2001 | US |