Dual spring posterior dynamic stabilization device with elongation limiting elastomers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8641734
  • Patent Number
    8,641,734
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 29, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 4, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A Posterior Dynamic Stabilization (PDS) device that regulates physiologic spinal elongation and compression. Regulation of elongation and compression are critical requirements of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization devices. Elongation and compression of the device allow the pedicles to travel naturally as the spine flexes and extends. This interpedicular travel preserves a more natural center of rotation unlike some conventional PDS devices that simply allow bending. The device incorporates two components: 1) a spring that allows elongation/compression, and 2) a polymer core component that serves to increase the stiffness of the device in shear, bending, and tension, and also prevents soft tissue ingrowth.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The vertebrae in a patient's spinal column are linked to one another by the disc and the facet joints, which control movement of the vertebrae relative to one another. Each vertebra has a pair of articulating surfaces located on the left side, and a pair of articulating surfaces located on the right side, and each pair includes a superior articular surface, which faces upward, and an inferior articular surface, which faces downward. Together the superior and inferior articular surfaces of adjacent vertebra form a facet joint. Facet joints are synovial joints, which means that each joint is surrounded by a capsule of connective tissue and produces a fluid to nourish and lubricate the joint. The joint surfaces are coated with cartilage allowing the joints to move or articulate relative to one another.


Diseased, degenerated, impaired, or otherwise painful facet joints and/or discs can require surgery to restore function to the three joint complex. Damaged, diseased levels in the spine were traditionally fused to one another. While such a technique may relieve pain, it effectively prevents motion between at least two vertebrae. As a result, additional stress may be applied to the adjoining levels, thereby potentially leading to further damage.


More recently, techniques have been developed to restore normal function to the facet joints. One such technique involves covering the facet joint with a cap to preserve the bony and articular structure. Capping techniques, however, are limited in use as they will not remove the source of the pain in osteoarthritic joints. Caps are also disadvantageous as they must be available in a variety of sizes and shapes to accommodate the wide variability in the anatomical morphology of the facets. Caps also have a tendency to loosen over time, potentially resulting in additional damage to the joint and/or the bone support structure containing the cap.


Other techniques for restoring the normal function to the posterior element involve arch replacement, in which superior and inferior prosthetic arches are implanted to extend across the vertebra typically between the spinous process. The arches can articulate relative to one another to replace the articulating function of the facet joints. One drawback of current articulating facet replacement devices, however, is that they require the facet joints to be resected. Moreover, alignment of the articulating surfaces with one another can be challenging.


Accordingly, there remains a need for improved systems and methods that are adapted to mimic the natural function of the facet joints.


US Patent Publication No. 2006/0142758 (“Petit”) discloses a linking element that consists of a helical spring and a support member made out of a polymer material. The helical spring is embedded in the support material.


US Patent Publication No. 2004/0215191 (“Kitchen”) discloses a flexible tube comprising at least one lumen that extends the length of the tube. At least one rod of a preformed curvature is present within said one lumen of the tube. As additional rods are placed within the hollow flexible member, increased force is applied to the spine by the device, thereby moving the spine towards the desired curvature.


US Patent Publication No. 2004/0049189 (“Le Couedic”) discloses a device that has two rigid rod-forming parts made of a first material. A connecting body that is made entirely from a second material that is more elastically deformable than said first material interconnects the two rod-forming portions.


US Patent Publication No. 2005/0065514 (“Studer”) discloses a dampening element comprising two spring elements coaxial with or parallel to a longitudinal axis, and two axially end-side connectors. The end-side connectors can be linked to the spring elements such that at least one of the spring elements is connected to the connectors. The two spring elements have different spring rates and one sprint element is designed as a tension and compression spring and comprises a spring coil, and the damping element is pre-stressed.


EP Patent Publication No. 0 677 277 (“Moreau I”) discloses a helically split oblong rotating member attached to upper and lower parts. The hollow central part of said member is filled at rest with a viscoelastic cushioning product cast in inter-thread overflow.


FR Patent Publication No. 2 717 370 (“Moreau II”) discloses an intervertebral stabilizing prosthesis comprising a hollow body of revolution that is radially and/or helically slotted to make it axially flexible, whose internal spaces and slots are filled with a viscoelastic product constituting an elastic shock-absorbing tensioner that is micrometrically adjustable. Yoke systems allow the assembly to be embedded by nuts into anchors and screwed into the bone.


GB Patent Publication No. 2 382 307 (“Sengupta”) discloses an assembly for soft stabilization of the spine comprising a pair of pedicle screws and a helical spring member. The helical spring member may be made from titanium or stainless steel. A plastic sleeve may or may not cover the spring.


US Patent Publication No. 2005/0203517 (“Jahng”) discloses an elastomer cladding on a wire.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,989,011 (Paul) discloses a device containing a spring and two ends, where the ends and the spring are integrally formed.


US 2006/0041259 (Paul) discloses a dynamic device containing at least one spring integrally formed to the substantially solid ends.


US 2003/0109880 (Shirado) discloses a resilient PDS member with anchors.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,761,719 (Justis) discloses a device for stabilizing at least a portion of the spinal column, including a longitudinal member sized to span a distance between at least two vertebral bodies and being at least partially formed of a shape-memory material exhibiting pseudoelastic characteristics at about human body temperature. A number of bone anchors are used to secure the longitudinal member to each of the vertebral bodies. The longitudinal member is reformed from an initial configuration to a different configuration in response to the imposition of stress caused by relative displacement between the vertebral bodies, and recovers toward the initial configuration when the stress is removed to thereby provide flexible stabilization to the spinal column. During reformation of the longitudinal member, at least a portion of the shape-memory material transforms into stress-induced martensite. In a particular aspect of the invention, the longitudinal member is a plate having a central portion at least partially formed of the shape-memory material, and a pair of connection portions disposed at opposite ends of the central portion for connection to each of the vertebral bodies. The central portion of the plate defines a number of alternating ridges and grooves along a length thereof having an initial amplitude corresponding to the initial configuration and a different amplitude corresponding to the different configuration.


US 2004/0236329 (Panjabi) discloses a dynamic rod device with greater resistance to movement during the central zone and lower resistance to movement as it extends beyond the central zone, i.e. neutral zone theory.


US 2005/0171543 (Timm) discloses a pedicle based dynamic stabilization system.


US 2006/0036240 (Colleran) discloses a dynamic device allowing controlled motion and disc off loading.


US 2008/0033435 (Studer) discloses a dynamic device with two springs and a dampening element where the two springs have different spring constants.


US 2006/0282080 (Albert) discloses a dynamic device with a spring element.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization (PDS) device that regulates physiologic spinal elongation and compression. Regulation of elongation and compression are critical requirements of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization devices. Elongation and compression of the device allow the pedicles to travel naturally as the spine flexes and extends. This interpedicular travel preserves a more natural center of rotation unlike some conventional PDS devices that simply allow bending. The present invention incorporates two components: 1) a spring that allows elongation/compression, and 2) a polymer core component that serves to increase the stiffness of the device in shear, bending, and tension, and also prevents soft tissue ingrowth.


Preferred embodiments of the device of the present invention feature a single-level device used for Posterior Dynamic Stabilization that comprises a dual-helix titanium spring, a polymer core component disposed within the spring, and a pair of bone anchor attachment features.


The dual helix spring has numerous parameters that can be altered to adjust the overall device stiffness, and which may include: wire diameter, spring overall diameter, spring pitch and material of construction. The spring can take many forms that allow it to be linked to a bone anchor. The preferred embodiment of the invention includes a coiled spring whose ends terminate in linear sections running substantially parallel to the axis of the spring coil. This, however, is not a requirement and the coil could terminate in any means that can attach to a bone anchor.


The polymer core component regulates the response of the spring by limiting its elongation. The polymer component also has numerous parameters that can be altered to adjust the overall device stiffness, which may include: clearance of polymer core with inner diameter of spring, length, and material of construction. In a preferred embodiment, the polymer component fills the inner diameter of the spring. However, this component could take many forms.


The attachment feature allows the spring component of the device to attach to a bone anchor. An attachment feature is typically located at each end of the device and together they flank the centrally located spring. The attachment feature can be integral to the spring or it can be a separate component that allows it to mate to bone anchors such as a screw or a hook. In some embodiments, the attachment feature is a rod, preferably having an open bore opening from its inner end.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a posterior dynamic stabilization device comprising;

    • a) a first end attachment feature adapted for attachment to a first bone anchor,
    • b) a second end attachment feature adapted for attachment to a second bone anchor,
    • c) an intermediate spring portion comprising first and second springs, each spring having a helical intermediate portion, the helical intermediate portions oriented to form a double helix.


      Preferably, the double helix defines an internal space and the device further comprises:
    • d) a polymer core located at least within the internal space of the double helix.





DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 discloses a first embodiment of the device of the present invention.



FIG. 2 discloses the device of FIG. 1 attached to a pair of bone anchors.



FIG. 3 discloses the device of FIG. 1 modified with a smaller diameter wire in the spring section.



FIGS. 4
a-b disclose side and cross-section views of the device of FIG. 1.



FIG. 5 discloses a multi-level embodiment of the device of the present invention.



FIG. 6 discloses a device of the present invention preferably used for topping off.



FIG. 7 discloses the device of FIG. 1 in which the spring unit is overmolded with a second polymer component.



FIG. 8 discloses the device of FIG. 7 in which gaps are present between the attachment end features and the central overmolded polymer component.



FIG. 9 discloses a cross-section of FIG. 8.



FIG. 10 discloses an exploded view of an embodiment of the present invention having a solid component inserted into a spring end.



FIG. 11 discloses an embodiment in which a set screw locks semi-cylinder portions of an end rod.



FIG. 12 discloses an embodiment in which the set screw locks the spring termination end into the hollow rod.



FIGS. 13 and 14 disclose side and cross-section views of a device having compression caps.



FIG. 15 discloses an exploded view of a device of the present invention in which the dual helix contains a polymer core and is flanked by a pair of compression caps.



FIGS. 16
a-c disclose various views of a preferred embodiment of the present invention containing an overmolded polymer component.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Now referring to FIG. 1, there is provided a posterior dynamic stabilization device comprising;






    • a) a first end attachment feature 1 adapted for attachment to a first bone anchor,

    • b) a second end attachment feature 3 adapted for attachment to a second bone anchor, and

    • c) an intermediate spring portion 5 comprising a first spring 7 and a second spring 9, each spring having a helical intermediate portion 11, the helical intermediate portions oriented to form a double helix.





Now referring to FIGS. 2-3, there is provided a single level device 10 of the present invention, wherein the device is attached to two bone anchors 13 by securing a set screw 15 to the respective attachment feature portions 1,3 of the device. As stated above, various parameters of the device's spring may be changed to modify and alter its stiffness. In this FIG. 3, a smaller wire diameter on the springs 17 is shown. This feature may be combined with other alterations (such as overall diameter of the spring, material, etc) to alter device performance. In this case, the smaller wire diameter decreases the stiffness of the spring (and thus the device). In some embodiments, a kit is provided with various spring geometries and/or with various polymer properties to create a spectrum of rod stiffnesses that can be selected by the surgeon to treat a variety of surgical indications.


Now referring to FIGS. 4a-4b, the polymer component 21 of the device offers some resistance to device elongation as the spring stretches during physiologic spinal elongation and squeezes the polymer core. Therefore, the polymer component contributes to device performance by helping control both elongation and compression of the spring unit.


As shown best in FIG. 4b, in some embodiments, the ends 23 of the springs 7,9 are contained within the respective opposing attachment features (in this case, the rods). This containment may be accomplished in a variety of ways. The dual spring ends may also be captured within attachment features that possess geometries other than a rod geometry (such as a square or a block).


Now referring to FIG. 5, multi-level devices of the present invention can be constructed in a variety of configurations by using two or more spring sections. The stiffness at each segment may be the same or it may vary depending on the indication being treated.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a multi-level posterior dynamic stabilization device comprising;

    • a) a first end attachment feature 101 adapted for attachment to a first bone anchor,
    • b) a second end attachment feature 103 adapted for attachment to a second bone anchor,
    • c) an intermediate attachment feature 105 adapted for attachment to a third bone anchor
    • d) a first intermediate spring portion 111 located between the first end attachment feature and the intermediate attachment feature, and comprising a first spring 113 and a second spring 115, each spring having a helical intermediate portion 117, the helical intermediate portions oriented to form a first double helix, and
    • e) a second intermediate spring portion 121 located between the second end attachment feature and the intermediate attachment feature, and comprising a third spring 123 and a fourth spring 125, each spring having a helical intermediate portion 127, the helical intermediate portions oriented to form a second double helix.


Now referring to FIG. 6, another embodiment of the present invention features a first long rod 25 and a short rod segment 27 attached to a central spring 26. This embodiment may be used to address cases in which the surgeon would like to “top off” a fusion. In use, both short rod 27 and the inner portion 31 of the long rod are attached to bone anchors at the terminating level of the construct. The outer portion 33 of the long rod is attached to a bone anchor at a fusion segment. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided the device of the present invention wherein the first rod has a first length and the second rod has a second length, wherein the first length is greater than the second length. Preferably, the first length is at least two times greater than the second length.


As mentioned above, various components of this device can be modified to achieve a desired profile of stiffnesses in tension, shear, and bending. Now referring to FIGS. 7 and 8, a second polymer component 35 is molded entirely around the central spring portions. Addition of this “overmolded” polymer component increases the stiffness of the device. This “overmolded” polymer component is further advantageous because it also prevents tissue in-growth, thereby preventing tissue from entering the springs when the spine moves and the springs stretch.


Therefore, and now referring to FIGS. 7-9, in some embodiments, a first polymer core 41 is located within the internal space of the double helix and a second polymer component 35 extends through the double helix to overmold the helix. In some embodiments, the first and second polymer components are integral. In some embodiments, the overmolding extends to only tangentially cover the helix. In other embodiments, the overmolding extends past the helix.


Now referring to FIG. 8, the device may include a gap 37 present as a space between the overmolded polymer component 35 and the inner ends 39 of the rod/anchor attachment portion. Therefore, in some embodiments, the first end attachment feature comprises a first rod, and the second end attachment feature comprises a second rod, and wherein the polymer core and the first rod define a first gap therebetween, and wherein the polymer core and the second rod define a second gap therebetween. The function of the gap is to prevent molding of the rod.


Now referring to FIG. 9, the polymer component can be constructed as a single integral component or as a plurality of separate components. In one embodiment, the polymer core 41 is assembled and a separate outer polymer sheath 43 is either overmolded or assembled. The core and outer sheath may also be manufactured as one integral component using an overmold process.


Therefore, in some embodiments, the polymer core is located within the internal space of the double helix and extends through the double helix to overmold the helix.


The polymer component may be selected from a range of polymers with a range of durometers and stiffnesses. The polymer may be elastomer-based, thermoplastic-based, or may be a composite of the two. In preferred embodiments, the polymer component is selected from silicone rubber or polycarbonate urethane.


There are many possible configurations leading to assembly of the device. In one manufacturing method, and now referring to FIG. 10, a first tube 51 is threaded over the dual spring 53 to provide a clamping surface. A solid component 55 is then threaded into terminating end 57 of the spring to prevent collapse and allow attachment to the clamping end tube 59. The polymer core 61 may be passed through the tighter terminating end of coil in multiple pieces.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, in one embodiment, each spring further comprises a first spring termination end 57 having a first diameter, and the device further comprises d) a solid component 55 having a threaded outer surface 63, wherein the solid component is located within the first spring termination end.


Now referring to FIG. 11, in some embodiments, the spring terminates in a linear rod section 65 and mates with a rod end to clamp the spring in place.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, in one embodiment, each spring further comprises a first end 65 having a linear rod configuration, and the linear rod fits into a hollow bore (not shown) of the first end attachment feature 69.


In some embodiments, the first end attachment feature 69 comprises first 75 and second 77 semi-cylinders, and the device further comprises d) a set screw 71 passing through a first hole 72a in each of the outer surface 74 of the first semi-cylinder and a second hole 72b in the inner surface 76 of the second semi-cylinder.


Now referring to FIG. 12, in some embodiments, a linear portion 78 of the terminating spring end mates with parallel bores 79 in the inner end 81 of the rod 83 that are aligned with the rod axis. A set screw 85 with a point 87 at its tip is passed through a transverse hole 89 in the body of the rod to spread the wires away from each other and lock the spring ends in place.


Also in accordance with the present invention, in one embodiment each spring further comprises a first end 78 having a linear rod configuration, wherein the linear rod fits into a hollow bore 79 in an inner end 81 of the first end attachment feature, and the device further comprises d) a set screw 85 passing through the first attachment feature to lock the linear rod. Preferably, an end of the set screw is frustoconical.


Now referring to FIGS. 13 and 14, the device may further include a compression assembly 91 (or compression cap) that has ends adapted to compress the spring unit. Tapered compression ends of the cap serve to clamp the dual spring in place.


Therefore, also in accordance with the present invention, in one embodiment the device further comprises: d) a compression cap 91 disposed between the first end attachment feature 93 and the intermediate spring portion 95.



FIG. 15 discloses an exploded view of a device of the present invention in which the dual helix contains a polymer core and is flanked by a pair of compression caps. Now referring to FIG. 15, there is provided an exploded view of FIGS. 13 and 14, showing rod ends 101, compression caps 103, a polymer core 105, and a spring 107.


The springs in the double helix may also terminate with a linear end section (not shown), which would allow smaller attachment rod ends to be used.


Now referring to FIGS. 16a-c, there is provided a device of the present invention constructed of five components:

    • a) two springs 211,213 creating a double helix configuration,
    • b) two threaded rod ends 215, which are threaded through the helical terminations 117 of the spring on each end, and
    • c) a final overmold structure 119 that creates a constant diameter and clamping surface.


      The two threaded rod ends could be made from any material and the split 121 in the center allows the spring to somewhat stretch. This split could be located anywhere along the core and have a variety of geometries. The threaded ends 115 of the rods 123 prevent compression of spring during clamping and provide attachment means for the spring. The overmold structure provides the device with a constant overall diameter.


Therefore, in preferred embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a PDS device having a dual lead coil spring design forming a double helix, where the spring wire has a circular cross section. This device achieves its axial stiffness primarily by way of the double helix spring and secondly by way of the polymer core component. Shear and bending forces are also mediated by the interaction between these components. This device will have relatively low resistance to axial displacements at low loads, but will become increasingly stiff as the double helix spring engages the polymer core component. Accordingly, there is provided a comprehensive dynamic stabilization system with different devices having different stiffnesses to serve a variety of patients' needs. This system may be particularly useful in multi-level cases, wherein the stiffnesses at adjacent flexible segments may vary.


One skilled in the art will appreciate that the rod of the device may be configured for use with any type of bone anchor, e.g., bone screw or hook; mono-axial or polyaxial. Typically, a bone anchor assembly includes a bone screw, such as a pedicle screw, having a proximal head and a distal bone-engaging portion, which may be an externally threaded screw shank. The bone screw assembly may also have a receiving member that is configured to receive and couple a spinal fixation element, such as a spinal rod or spinal plate, to the bone anchor assembly.


The receiving member may be coupled to the bone anchor in any well-known conventional manner. For example, the bone anchor assembly may be poly-axial, as in the present exemplary embodiment in which the bone anchor may be adjustable to multiple angles relative to the receiving member, or the bone anchor assembly may be mono-axial, e.g., the bone anchor is fixed relative to the receiving member. An exemplary poly-axial bone screw is described U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,176, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In mono-axial embodiments, the bone anchor and the receiving member may be coaxial or may be oriented at angle with respect to one another. In poly-axial embodiments, the bone anchor may biased to a particular angle or range of angles to provide a favored angle the bone anchor. Exemplary favored-angle bone screws are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0055426 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0058942, the specifications of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a posterior dynamic spinal stabilization system for use in a human spine, comprising:

    • a) first and second bone anchors, each anchor having a recess for receiving a rod,
    • b) the device of the present invention.


Generally, in using the present invention, two bone anchors such as polyaxial screws are inserted into adjacent pedicles within a functional spinal unit of a patient. The cylinder-bumper-rod assembly of the present invention is then inserted into the patient between the anchors. The first hollow cylinder is attached to the first bone anchor by laying the outer annular surface of the first hollow cylinder into the first bone anchor recess and tightening an appropriate set screw. Similarly, the second end of the first rod is attached to the second bone anchor by laying the second end into the second bone anchor recess and tightening the appropriate set screw. More preferably, this is achieved in a minimally invasive surgery.


In some embodiments, at least one end of the cylinder-bumper-rod assembly has a bullet nose for ease of insertion.


In some embodiments, the assemble may be implanted in accordance with the minimally invasive techniques and instruments disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,179,261; and US Patent Publication Nos. US2005/0131421; US2005/0131422; US 2005/0215999; US2006/0149291; US2005/0154389; US2007/0233097; and US2005/0192589, the specifications of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of implanting a posterior dynamic spinal stabilization system, comprising the steps of:

    • a) inserting two bone anchors into adjacent pedicles within a functional spinal unit of a patient, each bone anchor having a recess for receiving a rod,
    • b) providing a polyaxial dynamic stabilization DEVICE comprising:


Each component of the design may be made from biocompatible, implantable materials known in the art such as stainless steel, titanium, nitinol, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or alternative polyarylketones, carbon fiber reinforced polymers, and high performance elastomers such as silicones, dimethylsiloxanes, silicone-urethanes, polyether-urethanes, silicone-polyether-urethanes, polycarbonate urethanes, and silicone-polycarbonate-urethanes.


Preferably, the coil and rod components are titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) or cobalt-chrome alloy (e.g. Co—Cr—Mo). If a cobalt-chrome alloy is selected, the alloy is preferably in a work-hardened condition so as to resist deformation upon securing to the bone anchor (e.g with a set screw). Preferably, the solid rod component is either titanium alloy or PEEK.


If a metal is chosen as a material of construction, then the metal is preferably selected from the group consisting of nitinol, titanium, titanium alloys (such as Ti-6Al-4V), cobalt-chrome alloys (such as CrCo or Cr—Co—Mo) and stainless steel.


If a polymer is chosen as a material of construction, then the polymer is preferably selected from the group consisting of polycarbonates, polyesters, (particularly aromatic esters such as polyalkylene terephthalates, polyamides; polyalkenes; poly(vinyl fluoride); PTFE; polyarylethyl ketone PAEK; and mixtures thereof.


In some embodiments, the core polymer and/or rod component is made from a composite comprising carbon fiber. Composites comprising carbon fiber are advantageous in that they typically have a strength and stiffness that is superior to neat polymer materials such as a polyarylethyl ketone PAEK. In some embodiments, the core is made from a polymer composite such as a PEKK-carbon fiber composite.


Preferably, the composite comprising carbon fiber further comprises a polymer. Preferably, the polymer is a polyarylethyl ketone (PAEK). More preferably, the PAEK is selected from the group consisting of polyetherether ketone (PEEK), polyether ketone ketone (PEKK) and polyether ketone (PEK). In preferred embodiments, the PAEK is PEEK.


In some embodiments, the carbon fiber comprises between 1 vol % and 60 vol % (more preferably, between 10 vol % and 50 vol %) of the composite. In some embodiments, the polymer and carbon fibers are homogeneously mixed. In others, the material is a laminate. In some embodiments, the carbon fiber is present in a chopped state. Preferably, the chopped carbon fibers have a median length of between 1 mm and 12 mm, more preferably between 4.5 mm and 7.5 mm. In some embodiments, the carbon fiber is present as continuous strands.


In especially preferred embodiments, the composite comprises:

    • a) 40-99% (more preferably, 60-80 vol %) polyarylethyl ketone (PAEK), and
    • b) 1-60% (more preferably, 20-40 vol %) carbon fiber,


      wherein the polyarylethyl ketone (PAEK) is selected from the group consisting of polyetherether ketone (PEEK), polyether ketone ketone (PEKK) and polyether ketone (PEK).


In some embodiments, the composite consists essentially of PAEK and carbon fiber. More preferably, the composite comprises 60-80 wt % PAEK and 20-40 wt % carbon fiber. Still more preferably the composite comprises 65-75 wt % PAEK and 25-35 wt % carbon fiber.


The elastomer core component is preferably made of a thermoplastic, biocompatible, high performance polycarbonate-urethance (PCU). The stiffness, or durometer of the PCU can be tailored to meet the specifications for the dynamic device. In preferred embodiments, the surface of the device components that will be attached to the elastomer are treated prior to attaching the bumper using known surface treatment methods such as surface roughening (e.g. grit blasting), chemical functionalization (e.g. primers), and plasma treatments know in the art. Alternatively or in conjunction with using a surface treatment, an adhesive may be used to enhance bonding, e.g. using cyanoacrylates. In one preferred embodiment, the surfaces of the device components that will attached to the elastomer will first be roughened using grit blasting, then chemically functionalized using primer, then the elastomer will be overmolded onto the device components.

Claims
  • 1. A posterior dynamic stabilization device comprising; i) first and second bone anchors,ii) a double helix spring comprising: a) a first end attachment feature attached to the first bone anchor and having an inner end having a hollow bore,b) a second end attachment feature attached to the second bone anchor and having an inner end having a hollow bore,c) an intermediate spring portion comprising first and second springs, each spring having a helical intermediate portion, the helical intermediate portions oriented to form a double helix,
CONTINUING DATA

This non-provisional patent application claims priority from provisional U.S. Ser. No. 61/152,610, filed Feb. 13, 2009, entitled “Dual Spring Rod with Elongation Limiting Elastomer” (Moumene).

US Referenced Citations (314)
Number Name Date Kind
3992725 Homsy Nov 1976 A
4512038 Alexander Apr 1985 A
4648388 Steffee Mar 1987 A
4743260 Burton May 1988 A
4854304 Zielke Aug 1989 A
5002542 Frigg Mar 1991 A
5034011 Howland Jul 1991 A
5092866 Breard Mar 1992 A
5180393 Commarmond Jan 1993 A
5181930 Dumbleton Jan 1993 A
5207678 Harms May 1993 A
5217461 Asher Jun 1993 A
5217497 Mehdian Jun 1993 A
5282863 Burton Feb 1994 A
5344422 Frigg Sep 1994 A
5360431 Puno Nov 1994 A
5375823 Navas Dec 1994 A
5387213 Breard Feb 1995 A
5403314 Currier Apr 1995 A
5415661 Holmes May 1995 A
5423816 Lin Jun 1995 A
5429639 Judet Jul 1995 A
5474555 Puno Dec 1995 A
5486174 Fournet Fayard Jan 1996 A
5496321 Puno Mar 1996 A
5520689 Schlapfer May 1996 A
5540688 Navas Jul 1996 A
5540689 Sanders Jul 1996 A
5562660 Grob Oct 1996 A
5562663 Wisnewski Oct 1996 A
5562737 Graf Oct 1996 A
5630817 Rokegem May 1997 A
5643260 Doherty Jul 1997 A
5658286 Sava Aug 1997 A
5672175 Martin Sep 1997 A
5672176 Biederman Sep 1997 A
5683390 Metz Stavenhagen Nov 1997 A
5702395 Hopf Dec 1997 A
5704936 Mazel Jan 1998 A
5704937 Martin Jan 1998 A
5728098 Sherman Mar 1998 A
5733284 Martin Mar 1998 A
5738685 Halm Apr 1998 A
5782833 Haider Jul 1998 A
5797910 Martin Aug 1998 A
5851006 Spillner Dec 1998 A
5879350 Sherman Mar 1999 A
5954725 Sherman Sep 1999 A
5961516 Graf Oct 1999 A
6004349 Jackson Dec 1999 A
6022350 Ganem Feb 2000 A
6053917 Sherman Apr 2000 A
6063090 Schlapfer May 2000 A
6077262 Schlapfer Jun 2000 A
6083226 Fiz Jul 2000 A
6099528 Saurat Aug 2000 A
6102912 Cazin Aug 2000 A
6139549 Keller Oct 2000 A
6224598 Jackson May 2001 B1
6241730 Alby Jun 2001 B1
6248105 Schläpfer Jun 2001 B1
6251112 Jackson Jun 2001 B1
6267764 Elberg Jul 2001 B1
6273888 Justis Aug 2001 B1
6293949 Justis Sep 2001 B1
6302888 Mellinger Oct 2001 B1
6361535 Jackson Mar 2002 B2
6371957 Amrein Apr 2002 B1
6379356 Jackson Apr 2002 B1
6402750 Atkinson Jun 2002 B1
6402752 Schäffler Wachter Jun 2002 B2
6440132 Jackson Aug 2002 B1
6471705 Biedermann Oct 2002 B1
6485491 Farris et al. Nov 2002 B1
6520963 McKinley Feb 2003 B1
6540749 Schäfer Apr 2003 B2
6554831 Rivard Apr 2003 B1
6595993 Donno Jul 2003 B2
6626908 Cooper Sep 2003 B2
6641586 Varieur Nov 2003 B2
6645207 Dixon Nov 2003 B2
6652526 Arafiles Nov 2003 B1
6695843 Biedermann Feb 2004 B2
6723100 Biedermann Apr 2004 B2
6726687 Jackson Apr 2004 B2
6730089 Jackson May 2004 B2
6755829 Bono Jun 2004 B1
6761719 Justis Jul 2004 B2
6783527 Drewry Aug 2004 B2
6786903 Lin Sep 2004 B2
6796984 Soubeiran Sep 2004 B2
6835205 Atkinson Dec 2004 B2
6843791 Serhan Jan 2005 B2
6896677 Lin May 2005 B1
6905500 Jeon Jun 2005 B2
6918911 Biedermann Jul 2005 B2
6966910 Ritland Nov 2005 B2
6986771 Paul Jan 2006 B2
6989011 Paul et al. Jan 2006 B2
6997927 Jackson Feb 2006 B2
7018378 Biedermann Mar 2006 B2
7022122 Amrein Apr 2006 B2
7029475 Panjabi Apr 2006 B2
7125410 Freudiger Oct 2006 B2
7137985 Jahng Nov 2006 B2
7156850 Kim Jan 2007 B2
7175622 Farris Feb 2007 B2
7179261 Sicvol Feb 2007 B2
7204838 Jackson Apr 2007 B2
7211086 Biedermann May 2007 B2
7261714 Richelsoph Aug 2007 B2
7326210 Jahng Feb 2008 B2
7329258 Studer Feb 2008 B2
7335200 Carli Feb 2008 B2
7419714 Magerl Sep 2008 B1
7556639 Rothman Jul 2009 B2
7621912 Harms Nov 2009 B2
7621940 Harms Nov 2009 B2
7632292 Sengupta Dec 2009 B2
7641673 Le Couedic Jan 2010 B2
7651515 Mack Jan 2010 B2
7713287 Timm May 2010 B2
7717941 Petit May 2010 B2
7722649 Biedermann May 2010 B2
7727258 Graf Jun 2010 B2
7763052 Jahng Jul 2010 B2
7776071 Fortin Aug 2010 B2
7776075 Bruneau Aug 2010 B2
7811309 Timm Oct 2010 B2
7815665 Jahng Oct 2010 B2
7833256 Biedermann Nov 2010 B2
7846187 Jackson Dec 2010 B2
7862586 Malek Jan 2011 B2
7942907 Richelsoph May 2011 B2
7988710 Jahng Aug 2011 B2
7993370 Jahng Aug 2011 B2
8012178 Hartmann Sep 2011 B2
8241362 Voorhies Aug 2012 B2
20020058942 Biedermann May 2002 A1
20020072751 Jackson Jun 2002 A1
20020082602 Biedermann Jun 2002 A1
20020133155 Ferree Sep 2002 A1
20020133159 Jackson Sep 2002 A1
20030009226 Graf Jan 2003 A1
20030041441 Lin Mar 2003 A1
20030055426 Carbone Mar 2003 A1
20030055427 Graf Mar 2003 A1
20030083657 Drewry May 2003 A1
20030100896 Biedermann May 2003 A1
20030109880 Shirado Jun 2003 A1
20030125741 Biedermann Jul 2003 A1
20030149431 Varieur Aug 2003 A1
20030153912 Graf Aug 2003 A1
20030171749 Le Couedic Sep 2003 A1
20030191470 Ritland Oct 2003 A1
20030220642 Freudiger Nov 2003 A1
20030220643 Ferree Nov 2003 A1
20040002708 Ritland Jan 2004 A1
20040049189 Le Couedic Mar 2004 A1
20040049190 Biedermann Mar 2004 A1
20040068258 Schlapfer Apr 2004 A1
20040073215 Carli Apr 2004 A1
20040097926 Kim May 2004 A1
20040097933 Lourdel May 2004 A1
20040106921 Cheung Jun 2004 A1
20040116927 Graf Jun 2004 A1
20040143264 McAfee Jul 2004 A1
20040167523 Jackson Aug 2004 A1
20040186474 Matthis Sep 2004 A1
20040186478 Jackson Sep 2004 A1
20040215191 Kitchen Oct 2004 A1
20040215192 Justis Oct 2004 A1
20040225289 Biedermann Nov 2004 A1
20040230191 Frey Nov 2004 A1
20040230192 Graf Nov 2004 A1
20040236327 Paul Nov 2004 A1
20040236328 Paul Nov 2004 A1
20040236329 Panjabi Nov 2004 A1
20040260284 Parker Dec 2004 A1
20040264386 Ha Dec 2004 A1
20040267260 Mack Dec 2004 A1
20050027292 Bernard Feb 2005 A1
20050033295 Wisnewski Feb 2005 A1
20050038432 Shaolian Feb 2005 A1
20050049708 Atkinson Mar 2005 A1
20050056979 Studer Mar 2005 A1
20050065514 Studer Mar 2005 A1
20050065516 Jahng Mar 2005 A1
20050080414 Keyer Apr 2005 A1
20050085814 Sherman Apr 2005 A1
20050085815 Harms Apr 2005 A1
20050113927 Malek May 2005 A1
20050124991 Jahng Jun 2005 A1
20050129499 Morris Jun 2005 A1
20050131407 Sicvol Jun 2005 A1
20050131421 Anderson Jun 2005 A1
20050131422 Anderson Jun 2005 A1
20050143737 Pafford Jun 2005 A1
20050143823 Boyd Jun 2005 A1
20050149020 Jahng Jul 2005 A1
20050154389 Selover Jul 2005 A1
20050154390 Biedermann Jul 2005 A1
20050165396 Fortin Jul 2005 A1
20050171543 Timm Aug 2005 A1
20050177156 Timm Aug 2005 A1
20050177157 Jahng Aug 2005 A1
20050177164 Walters Aug 2005 A1
20050182400 White Aug 2005 A1
20050182401 Timm Aug 2005 A1
20050182409 Callahan Aug 2005 A1
20050187549 Jackson Aug 2005 A1
20050192589 Raymond Sep 2005 A1
20050202519 Barthe Sep 2005 A1
20050203511 Wilson MacDonald Sep 2005 A1
20050203513 Jahng Sep 2005 A1
20050203514 Jahng Sep 2005 A1
20050203516 Biedermann Sep 2005 A1
20050203517 Jahng Sep 2005 A1
20050203518 Biedermann Sep 2005 A1
20050203519 Harms Sep 2005 A1
20050215999 Birkmeyer Sep 2005 A1
20050216003 Biedermann Sep 2005 A1
20050222569 Panjabi Oct 2005 A1
20050222659 Olsen Oct 2005 A1
20050245930 Timm Nov 2005 A1
20050261685 Fortin Nov 2005 A1
20050261686 Paul Nov 2005 A1
20050267471 Biedermann Dec 2005 A1
20050277919 Slivka Dec 2005 A1
20050277922 Trieu Dec 2005 A1
20050288670 Panjabi Dec 2005 A1
20050288672 Ferree Dec 2005 A1
20060009768 Ritland Jan 2006 A1
20060014259 Burke Jan 2006 A9
20060025767 Khalili Feb 2006 A1
20060036240 Colleran Feb 2006 A1
20060041259 Paul Feb 2006 A1
20060064090 Park Mar 2006 A1
20060084984 Kim Apr 2006 A1
20060106380 Colleran May 2006 A1
20060106381 Ferree May 2006 A1
20060129147 Biedermann et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142758 Petit Jun 2006 A1
20060142760 McDonnell Jun 2006 A1
20060149235 Jackson Jul 2006 A1
20060149291 Selover Jul 2006 A1
20060155279 Ogilvie Jul 2006 A1
20060161152 Ensign Jul 2006 A1
20060184171 Biedermann Aug 2006 A1
20060189983 Fallin Aug 2006 A1
20060189984 Fallin Aug 2006 A1
20060195093 Jahng Aug 2006 A1
20060212033 Rothman Sep 2006 A1
20060229607 Brumfield Oct 2006 A1
20060229608 Foster Oct 2006 A1
20060229612 Rothman et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240533 Sengupta et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060247632 Winslow Nov 2006 A1
20060247637 Colleran Nov 2006 A1
20060260483 Hartmann Nov 2006 A1
20060264935 White Nov 2006 A1
20060264937 White Nov 2006 A1
20060265074 Krishna Nov 2006 A1
20060282080 Albert Dec 2006 A1
20070003598 Trieu Jan 2007 A1
20070005063 Bruneau Jan 2007 A1
20070016190 Martinez Jan 2007 A1
20070016201 Freudiger Jan 2007 A1
20070019808 Gonzalez Jan 2007 A1
20070049937 Matthis et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055241 Matthis Mar 2007 A1
20070055244 Jackson Mar 2007 A1
20070055247 Jahng Mar 2007 A1
20070161992 Kwak Jul 2007 A1
20070191832 Trieu Aug 2007 A1
20070191841 Justis Aug 2007 A1
20070198088 Biedermann Aug 2007 A1
20070233064 Holt Oct 2007 A1
20070233073 Wisnewski Oct 2007 A1
20070233085 Biedermann Oct 2007 A1
20070233097 Anderson Oct 2007 A1
20070270814 Lim et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270838 Bruneau Nov 2007 A1
20080021469 Holt Jan 2008 A1
20080033435 Studer Feb 2008 A1
20080058809 Graf Mar 2008 A1
20080140133 Allard Jun 2008 A1
20080147122 Jackson Jun 2008 A1
20080161853 Arnold Jul 2008 A1
20080161863 Arnold Jul 2008 A1
20080183213 Veldman Jul 2008 A1
20080195105 Sidebotham et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080195153 Thompson Aug 2008 A1
20080262552 Kim Oct 2008 A1
20080312694 Peterman Dec 2008 A1
20090005817 Friedrich Jan 2009 A1
20090012562 Hestad Jan 2009 A1
20090030464 Hestad Jan 2009 A1
20090048631 Bhatnagar et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062866 Jackson Mar 2009 A1
20090099608 Szczesny Apr 2009 A1
20090131981 White May 2009 A1
20090163953 Biedermann Jun 2009 A1
20090204155 Aschmann Aug 2009 A1
20090251573 Toyoda Oct 2009 A1
20090281573 Biedermann et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100042156 Harms Feb 2010 A1
20100069962 Harms Mar 2010 A1
20100069964 Lechmann Mar 2010 A1
20100114169 Le Couedic May 2010 A1
20100114173 Le Couedic May 2010 A1
20100174317 Timm Jul 2010 A1
20100204736 Biedermann Aug 2010 A1
20110054534 Biedermann Mar 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (54)
Number Date Country
46518 Jul 1983 EP
470660 Jul 1995 EP
667127 Aug 1995 EP
516567 Jul 1997 EP
669109 May 1999 EP
732081 May 2000 EP
1281364 Jan 2004 EP
1364622 Jul 2005 EP
1579816 Sep 2005 EP
1388323 Jan 2007 EP
1574173 Jan 2007 EP
1523949 Jun 2007 EP
1747760 Oct 2009 EP
1488751 Nov 2009 EP
1586276 Nov 2009 EP
1776927 Sep 2010 EP
1658815 Mar 2012 EP
2717370 Sep 1995 FR
2382307 May 2003 GB
2004073855 Mar 2004 JP
2005118569 May 2005 JP
9501132 Jan 1995 WO
9505783 Mar 1995 WO
9513755 May 1995 WO
9641582 Dec 1996 WO
0145576 Jun 2001 WO
0156489 Aug 2001 WO
0207622 Jan 2002 WO
0217803 Apr 2002 WO
0243603 Jun 2002 WO
0269854 Sep 2002 WO
03007828 Jan 2003 WO
03009737 Feb 2003 WO
0212259 May 2003 WO
03041441 May 2003 WO
03041599 May 2003 WO
03047441 Jun 2003 WO
2004024011 Mar 2004 WO
2004034916 Apr 2004 WO
2004064653 Aug 2004 WO
2005027761 Mar 2005 WO
2005030066 Apr 2005 WO
2005039454 Jul 2005 WO
2005013839 Aug 2005 WO
2005044117 Aug 2005 WO
2005094704 Oct 2005 WO
2005030031 Jan 2006 WO
2006066053 Jun 2006 WO
2006118866 Nov 2006 WO
2006063107 Dec 2006 WO
2007007545 Jan 2007 WO
2006116437 Feb 2007 WO
2006115539 May 2007 WO
2008003047 Jun 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Betz, “Compairson of Anterior and Posterior Instrumentation for Correction of Adolsecent Thoracic Idiipathic Scoliosis”, Spine, Feb 1, 1999, vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 225-239.
Desroches “Biomechanical modeling of anterior spine instrumentation in AIS”, Stud Health Technol Inform, 2006, vol. 123, pp. 415-418—abstract.
Hefti, “Repair of lumbar spondylolysis with a hook-screw”, Int Orthop., 1992, vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 81-85—abstract.
Nohara, “Biomechanical study of adjacent intervertebral motion after lumbar spinal fusion and flexible stabilization using polyethylene-terephthalate bands”, J Spinal Discord Tech, Jun. 2004, vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 215-219—abstract.
Poulin, “Biomechanical modeling of instrumentation for the scoliotic spine using flexible elements: a feasibility study”, Ann Chir, 1998, 52(8), pp. 761-767—abstract.
Sanders, “A Preliminary Investigation of Shape Memory Alloys in the Surgical Correction of Scoliosis”, Spine, Sep. 15, 1993, vol. 18, Issue 12, pp. 1640-1646.
Smith, “Does Instrumented Anterior Scoliosis Surgery Lead to Pyphosis, Pseudarthrosis, or Inadequate Correction in Adults”, Spine, Mar. 1, 2002, vol. 27, Issue 5, pp. 529-34.
Teitelbaum, “New Percutaneously Inserted Spinal Fixation System”, Spine, Mar. 11, 2004, vol. 29, Issue 6, pp. 703-709.
Veldhuizen, “A Scoliosis Correction Device Based on Memory Metal”, Med. Eng. Phys., 1997, vol. 19, pp. 171-179, Elsevier Science Ltd.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100211104 A1 Aug 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61152610 Feb 2009 US