1. Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to the field of tracked vehicles. More particularly, the invention pertains to arrangements for driving the respective tracks of such vehicles.
2. Description of Related Art
For heavily loaded tracked vehicles, such as large tractors and military tanks, engine power is separately delivered to respective left and right endless tracks for driving the vehicle. The tracks are, respectively, positioned in loops along the sides of the vehicle, each track being wrapped beneath at least three or more load-bearing wheels, and each track being individually driven by means of a single drive sprocket often located near either the forward end or rearward end of the track loop. The end of the looped track opposite from the drive sprocket is often provided with balancing support in the form of an idler wheel. For heavy tracked vehicles, the drive sprockets have teeth that engage mating lugs formed within the tracks.
To compensate for changes in track tension when the vehicle is travelling over uneven terrain, most track suspensions provide a hydraulic or spring-biased tensioning apparatus that is associated with an idler wheel positioned under the portion of the track being supported for movement above the tops of the wheels. During normal operations over level terrain, the loads carried by the sprocket teeth and track lugs are quite large and, even with the just-mentioned track tension compensation, the tension on the tracks loosens and tightens.
The loosening and tightening of the tracks is particularly evident when the vehicle is pivot turning. The forward-moving track is taut at the rear of the track but has considerable slack at the front of the track loop, while the backward-moving track is taut at the front of the track but has considerable slack at the rear of the track loop. Even with the just-mentioned track tension compensation, this same tightening and loosening occurs, to a lesser extent, on all turning motions of tracks. Such momentary loosening and tightening of the track subjects the sprocket teeth and track lugs to shock loads that, particularly during operations over rough terrain, can be quite severe.
Consequently, since the beginning of the twentieth century (i.e., for more than 100 years), the single-sprocket driven tracks of heavy tracked vehicles such as tractors and tanks have often become damaged or disabled after relatively few miles of operation and, historically, are well known to experience a very short operational life. Presently, heavy tracked vehicles such as commercial bulldozers and modern military tanks, including, for example, the M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle (BAE Systems Land and Armaments, Arlington, Va., USA), the M1A1/M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tank (Lima Army Tank Plant, Lima, Ohio, USA), the Kodiak armored engineer vehicle (Rheinmetall AG, Duesseldorf, Germany), the Challenger 2 tank (Alvis Vickers LTD, Telford, Shropshire, UK), the Indian Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO) Arjun tank, the GIAT Leclerc battle tank (Giat Industries S.A., Versailles France), the HIT A1 Khalid (Pakistan)/Type 9041 (China)/MBT 2000 (China) tank, the PT-91 Twardy battle tank (Bumar Labedy, Gliwice, Poland), the ROTEM K2 battle tank (Hyundai Rotem, Changwon-City, South Korea), the T-90 Main Battle Tank (Uralvagonzavod, Nizhny Tagil, Russia), and the Type 99 tank (Norinco, Beijing, China), use such single-sprocket drives for their respective tracks, and such tanks share serious problems caused by the short life of their tracks.
As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,135,220, entitled “MODULAR SYSTEM FOR TRACK-LAYING VEHICLE”, issued Oct. 24, 2000 to Gleasman et al., incorporated by reference herein, a new track suspension was made public by Torvec, Inc., the assignee of the present application. That suspension had been developed following extensive testing of several prototypes. The tracks of that Torvec suspension are not sprocket driven but rather are driven only by friction between the track and the drive wheels. Initially, the frictional drive was limited to a drive wheel at one end of each track. However, U.S. Pat. No. 6,135,220 discloses a frictional drive preferably divided between front and rear drive wheels for each track, and left and right track differentials used to compensate for speed differences between the front and rear drive wheels of each track during vehicle operation.
A drive for a tracked vehicle that is supported by a pair of sprocket-driven tracks delivers divided drive torque from the vehicle engine to a pair of track differentials that are each associated, respectively, with one of the tracks. Each track includes two separate drive sprockets located, preferably, at the front and rear of the track, and the divided torque delivered to each track differential is further divided between the respective front and rear drive sprockets of each track. This latter differentiation maintains track wrap about the drive sprockets so that the drive torque and the spike-like forces generated by the momentary loosening and tightening of the track in response to variations in the terrain are shared between an optimal number of drive sprocket teeth at all times. Thus, drive and shock loads that must be borne by the track lugs are significantly reduced and track life is significantly increased.
The track drive provides a significant improvement in track life by an alteration in the delivery of engine power to each track. Namely, the drive load shared by the track lugs is reduced by 50% by providing a second drive sprocket, and the engine drive to each track is divided between the two drive sprockets. Preferably, the additional second sprocket replaces the balancing idler wheel mentioned above, and the two sprockets are located, respectively, at the front and rear of each track loop so that one sprocket is pulling the track at the same time that the other sprocket is pushing the track under all driving conditions. Although this additional drive sprocket may appear redundant, it reduces the drive load on the track lugs by 50%, while also increasing the efficiency of track operation.
The track drive preferably delivers conventionally-divided “left” and “right” engine outputs from a drive differential to two additional respective left and right “track” differentials that further divide the engine power between the front and rear drive sprockets of each respective track. The respective track differentials reduce “wind-up” from rotational speed differences between the front and rear drive sprockets that may arise from variations in track tension during vehicle operation.
There are long-standing problems associated with prior art sprocket-driven track drives. The track drive disclosed herein addresses those problems and provides a significant increase in useful track life.
This track drive not only reduces part fatigue and wear, but also, in effect, doubles safety factors relating to overloads of the track drive. Further, the track drive provides redundancy that may permit operation of the vehicle even in the event that the drive from one of the sprockets is lost. In this regard, one embodiment of the invention uses an all-gear limited-slip differential for each “track” differential.
In preferred embodiments, the dual-sprocket track drive is used on relatively heavy tracked vehicles, including, but not limited to, tractors, tanks, and bulldozers, and, as used herein, “tracked vehicles” refers to vehicles using one or more tracks rather than individual wheels to contact the terrain.
The track drive includes differentials that are preferably conventional “open” differentials but may alternatively be “limited-slip” differentials. Where limited-slip differentials are selected, all-gear limited-slip differentials with crossed-axes are preferred, including, but not limited to, those discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,783,476 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,540,821, which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. By using such a limited-slip differential in place of a conventional open differential, in the event that one damaged drive sprocket should begin to slip, the other drive sprocket may continue to carry the load.
Referring to
The upper portions of each track 10a, 10b are suspended above the upper surfaces of the respective vehicle-supporting wheels 11a, 11b, 12a, 12b, 13a, 13b, 14a, 14b, 15a, 15b, 16a, 16b, 17a, 17b by means of front drive sprockets 18a, 18b and rear drive sprockets 19a, 19b. Small idler rollers 20a, 21a, are positioned beneath the upper portions of each track 10a, 10b to provide additional support for slack in that portion of the track. A cabin 22 is indicated schematically to show the front of the tracked vehicle.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In
In
However, this latter differential action, as different from that occurring in
The relatively minor alterations in the relative speeds of the drive sprockets 18a and 19a, as permitted by the differential 25a, maintain a substantially optimum wrap of track 10a around the sprockets and significantly reduce the magnitude of spike-like forces that are borne by the track 10a and drive sprockets 18a and 19a from the momentary loosening and tightening of the track in response to variations in the terrain. Further, the drive divides the drive torque between the two drive sprockets 18a, 19a, thereby halving the amount of torque that must be supported by each sprocket. Also, the drive torque and the spike-like forces generated by the momentary loosening and tightening of the track in response to variations in the terrain are all shared between the more numerous teeth of the two drive sprockets. Thus, this division of the drive and shock loads between the more numerous teeth of the two drive sprockets results in significant reductions in the respective loads that must be borne by the track lugs, thereby significantly reducing track wear and increasing track life.
As indicated above, some possible further operational redundancy may be achieved in other embodiments of the invention, where the drive differential 24 and/or the track differentials 25a, 25b are limited-slip differentials. For heavier vehicles, all-gear limited-slip differentials with crossed-axes (e.g., IsoTorque® differentials, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,783,476) are preferred. With such limited-slip differentials, should one entire track become mired and begin to slip while the other track has traction, the track with fraction continues to drive the vehicle. Alternatively, should either of the pair of drive sprockets 18a, 19a or 19a, 19b become damaged and begin to slip, the other drive sprocket may still be sufficiently operational to provide some vehicle movement.
Accordingly, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention herein described are merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the invention. Reference herein to details of the illustrated embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of the claims, which themselves recite those features regarded as essential to the invention.
This application claims one or more inventions which were disclosed in Provisional Application No. 61/260,542, filed Nov. 12, 2009, entitled “DUAL-SPROCKET TRACK DRIVE”. The benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of the United States provisional application is hereby claimed, and the aforementioned application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61260542 | Nov 2009 | US |