Embodiments of the application are directed to multi-roll shape-correction levelers and, more particularly, multi-roll shape-correction levelers designed to overcome problems associated with differential roll speed.
The basic concept of a multi-roll shape-correction leveler (hereinafter also “shape-correction leveler” or just “leveler” for brevity) has been known for many years. Shape-correction levelers were developed to account for the deficiencies of known hot rolling mills and the undesirable shape defects hot rolling mills commonly impart to the metal strip produced thereby. Common but non-limiting forms of such shape defects are shown in
As represented in
During a flattening operation, metal strip material (typically from a coil) is fed into the entrance of the leveler as indicated, whereafter it is caused to pass between the opposing sets of work rolls 5, 10 (see
In known levelers, the gap 15 between the upper work rolls 5 and lower work rolls 10 at the entry side of the leveler (and work rolls) is deliberately made to be different than the gap 15 at the exit side of the leveler (and work rolls). More specifically, the gap 15 at the entry side of the leveler is set to be less than the gap at the exit side of the leveler to provide more work roll penetration, and more working of the metal strip, nearer the entry side of the leveler. In other words, the gap distance, and the amount of work roll penetration, feathers out from the entry side to the exit side of the leveler (i.e., in the direction of material flow).
As shown in
A shape-correction leveler may also be operated to selectively apply forces of different magnitudes to different areas of a strip of material passing therethrough. This selective application of force bends the work rolls to a shape that causes particular zones of the strip of material (from edge to edge) to be worked more than other zones as the strip passes through the leveler. Thus, shorter zones of the strip may be selectively elongated to match the length of the longer zones. This allows a shape-correction leveler to correct a variety of different shape defects.
For purposes of illustration, a typical shape-correction leveler setup 20 for correcting center buckle is shown in
Each work roll of a typical shape-correction leveler is normally driven to propel the strip of material through the leveler during a leveling (flattening) operation. A shape-correction leveler drive system commonly consists of a main motor, a reduction gearbox, and a pinion gearbox, that cooperate to provide output rotation to each work roll.
An interesting phenomenon occurs when the work rolls of known shape-correction levelers penetrate into a strip of material being processed and the material S-wraps through the work rolls. With light penetration (e.g., at the exit end of the leveler) the roll surface speed substantially matches the strip speed. However, when the rolls penetrate deeper (e.g., at the entry end of the leveler), the roll surface speed tends to run slower than the strip speed. This phenomenon occurs because the material has a bend radius, (entry end of leveler) and the surface speed of the material on the inside of the bend radius is moving slower than the surface speed on the outside of the bend radius (see
The aforementioned phenomenon may be referred to as differential roll speed (DRS). When the leveler work rolls are all driven together at the same speed (see e.g.,
Various approaches to overcoming the effects of DRS have been attempted, including but not limited to, the use of torque limiters on drive shafts; the use of torque limiting clutches on entry work roll clusters; complex and costly work roll drive systems such as systems where each work roll is individually driven, and systems utilizing split entry and exit work roll clusters with individual drive motors; and the use of two separate levelers. While torque limiters have been placed on work roll drive shafts, it has proven difficult to produce a slip torque level that is high enough to actually process strip material on levelers so equipped. Torque limiters have also proven to have a short service life and have been unreliable. Placing a torque limiter on the entry work roll cluster of a leveler so as to control the torque to the entry cluster based on total load may be effective at reducing the internal torque windup typically resulting from DRS, but torque windup still occurs within each cluster and a high torque concentration may also be present at the split between the entry and exit roll clusters. Driving each work roll of a leveler individually is very costly and can result in control difficulties when an associated leveler is used to flatten strip material across a range of material and shape defect conditions. The use of split entry and exit roll drive clusters with individual motors can also be effective at reducing the internal torque windup normally resulting from DRS, but torque windup still occurs within each work roll cluster and a high torque concentration may also be present at the split between the entry and exit roll clusters.
The desirability of overcoming the negative effects of DRS should be apparent from the foregoing remarks. It should also be apparent that improvements over the techniques previously used to mitigate or eliminate the effects of DRS would also be desirable. Exemplary embodiments presented herein overcome the effects of DRS using a single, dual-stage leveler, that allows for a simplified work roll drive system.
Exemplary dual-stage multi-roll leveler designs presented herein differ from known leveler designs at least because the work rolls of an exemplary dual-stage leveler are divided into two (or more) independent stages. Additionally, the entry side work roll gap and exit side work roll gap are kept equal, thereby eliminating the aforementioned feathering out of work roll penetration common to known levelers.
In one exemplary dual-stage leveler embodiment, the leveler includes a first work roll stage having a first set of work rolls that are subjected to roll bending for purposes of removing shape defects from strip material through material elongation as described above, as well as a separate, second work roll stage, that receives the strip material from the first stage and includes a second set of work rolls that are used to remove coil set and/or curl from the strip material without the use of work roll bending. The first stage work roll set and the second stage work roll set are independent of one another and may also be separately driven. As used herein, the terms “first stage” and “second stage” are intended to indicate only the order in which the provided sets of work rolls will contact the strip material as it passes through the leveler. No other meaning is to be implied.
The first stage work roll set and second stage work roll set may be—but do not have to be—installed to a cassette that is installable within the work envelope of the leveler. When used, the cassette may be divided into an upper half and a lower half, with the upper half including upper work rolls and associated supporting elements, and the lower half including lower work rolls and associated supporting elements.
An exemplary dual-stage leveler may include a gap adjusting mechanism, such as entry side and exit side jack screw assemblies, for adjusting the gap between (and the penetration of) the upper and lower work rolls of the first and second work roll sets. In at least some embodiments, the entry side and exit side jack screw assemblies may be geared together to always produce a uniform entry side-to-exit side work roll gap or change in work roll gap.
Work roll bending in an exemplary multi-stage leveler may be accomplished by various techniques known in the art. In one exemplary embodiment, an assembly of wedges may be used to produce desired work roll bending. A linear actuator or other motive device may be used to selectively displace the wedges as needed to produce the required work roll bending. In such an embodiment, first stage total work roll penetration may be controlled by a combination of jack screw assembly movement and wedge movement.
Other aspects and features of the inventive concept will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments along with the accompanying drawing figures.
In the following descriptions of the drawings and exemplary embodiments, like reference numerals across the several views refer to identical or equivalent features, and:
The aforementioned problem of differential roll speed on a multi-roll leveler of typical, known design, is illustrated via the combination of
Exemplary dual-stage multi-roll leveler (hereinafter “dual-stage leveler” for brevity) embodiments described herein are able to overcome the aforementioned problems associated with differential roll speed in a novel and efficient manner. A schematic side view of one such exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 appears in
As shown in
The exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 also includes a frame 115, with which is associated an upper and lower platen 120, 125. A working envelope 130 is defined between the platens 120, 125 and the entry side 105 and exit side 110 of the dual-stage leveler 100.
Disposed within the working envelope 130 is a first work roll stage 135 and a second work roll stage 140—the terms “first” and “second” being used herein only in a descriptive sense to indicate the order in which the work roll stages will encounter a strip material being passed through the leveler. Each of the first and second work roll stages 135, 140 includes work roll sets comprising a plurality of upper work rolls 145, 150 disposed above a plurality of lower work rolls 155, 160—the upper work rolls 145 and the lower work rolls 155 defining a first work roll stage work roll set and the upper work rolls 150 and the lower work rolls 160 defining a second work roll stage work roll set.
While the first work roll stage work roll set is shown to have a total of nine work rolls and the second work roll stage work roll set is shown to have a total of five work rolls in the dual-stage leveler 100 of
The upper work rolls 145, 150 and the lower work rolls 155, 160 of the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 are arranged in a substantially parallel relationship between the entry side 105 and exit 110 side of the leveler, with the longitudinal axis of each work roll oriented substantially perpendicular to the direction of travel of the strip material that will be passed through the leveler. As described in more detail below, the upper work rolls 145 and the lower work rolls 155 of the first work roll stage work roll set will cooperate to remove strip material shape defects during leveler operation, while the upper work rolls 150 and the lower work rolls 160 of the second work roll stage work roll set will cooperate to remove coil set and/or induced curl from the strip material during leveler operation.
The upper work rolls 145, 150 and/or the lower work rolls 155, 160 of the first and/or second stage work roll sets may be supported by a corresponding set of backup rolls, such as the exemplary backup rolls 165, 170 shown to support the upper work rolls 145, 150 in
The first and second leveler stages also include support bearings 185 that function to support the work rolls 145, 150, 155, 160—whether directly or through associated backup rolls. In the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 of
A gap adjusting mechanism is provided to adjust the space between the platens 120, 125 and, consequently, the gap between the upper work rolls 145, 150 and lower work rolls, 155, 160 of the first stage and second stage work roll sets. The gap between the upper work rolls 145, 150 and the lower work rolls 155, 160 of the first stage and second stage work roll sets is provided to allow metal strip material to pass therethrough during leveler operation.
In some embodiments, the gap adjusting mechanism of a dual-stage leveler embodiment may be configured for independent adjustment of the platen spacing along the entry and exit sides of the leveler. In other exemplary embodiments, the gap adjusting mechanism may be configured such that operation thereof will simultaneously adjust both the entry side and exit side platen spacing. In any case, the initial setting and subsequent adjustment of the platen spacing occurs in a manner that maintains parallelism between the platens and, consequently, an equal gap between the upper and lower work rolls of the first stage work roll set and the upper and lower work rolls of the second stage work roll set.
In the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 of
As should be understood from the foregoing description, the feathering out of work roll penetration common to known multi-roll levelers is eliminated in an exemplary dual-stage leveler design. Consequently, as shown in the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 of
As briefly mentioned above, shape defect removal is further accomplished in the first stage of a dual-stage leveler embodiment by way of bending the first work roll stage work rolls to selectively elongate or otherwise selectively deform at least certain sections of the strip material being flattened. Work roll bending may be performed on the upper work rolls and/or lower works rolls of a dual-stage leveler first work roll stage work roll set. In the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 embodiment of
Work roll bending in an exemplary dual-stage leveler may be achieved by any one or more of several techniques. In the case of the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 embodiment of
In previous multi-roll leveler designs, the upper crown or the wedge assembly of the leveler must tilt to provide deep entry roll penetration and little exit roll penetration—resulting in roll penetration that feathers out from the entry side to the exit side of the leveler as needed. However, this traditional leveler design and setup creates the differential roll speed and undesirable internal torque windup described above. In contrast, when an exemplary dual-stage leveler is configured as described above with respect to the dual-stage leveler 100 of
In the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 of
As a result of equal entry side and exit side work roll penetration within each leveler stage, as described above, the rotational speed of the entry and exit work rolls of each leveler stage will be the same (i.e., equal to the surface speed experienced by the inside bend radius of the strip material being processed). Differential roll speed is, therefore, eliminated by such a design, as is any associated internal torque windup within each stage. The lack of internal torque windup allows all of the torque applied to each work roll to be utilized for working the strip material, and the applied torque will be substantially equally distributed to each of the work rolls within a given stage (although the first and last work roll will may experience slightly less torque due to a lesser material wrap angle). Also, the lack of internal torque windup allows for a very predictable and manageable torque distribution.
As can be further observed in
An even better understanding of the operation of the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 may be gained by reference to
In some exemplary dual-stage leveler embodiments, such as the dual-stage leveler 100 shown in
Alternatively, the work rolls of a dual-stage leveler embodiment may be provided as part of a removable cassette assembly. One such exemplary cassette assembly 300 is represented in
The upper cassette subassembly 305 includes an upper sub-platen 315 that is adapted for releasable affixation to the upper platen of an associated dual-stage leveler (e.g., to the upper leveler platen 120 in
In a similar manner to the upper cassette subassembly 305, the lower cassette subassembly 310 includes a lower sub-platen 355 that is adapted for releasable affixation to the lower platen of an associated dual-stage leveler (e.g., to the lower leveler platen 125 in
In the same manner as described with respect to the exemplary dual-stage leveler 100 of
The exemplary cassette assembly 300 may further include a wedge assembly 385 that, in this embodiment, is a part of the lower cassette subassembly 310. The wedge assembly 385 may include a plurality of individual and selectively movable wedges as previously described in regard to the aforementioned wedge assembly 200 of
The dual-actuator design of this exemplary cassette embodiment allows the first set of actuators 390 to remain mechanically disconnected from the associated wedges, which facilitates installation and removal of the cassette assembly 300 to/from a dual-stage leveler. To further facilitate installation and removal of the cassette assembly in such an embodiment, the actuator stroke of the first set of actuators 390 may also be longer than the maximum wedge travel distance so as to allow for a gap between the pistons of the actuators 390 and a contacting surface of the wedges when the actuator pistons are withdrawn. The first set of actuators 390 may be mounted, for example, to a frame portion of an associated dual-stage leveler or to another structure in sufficiently close proximity thereto.
The second set of actuators 395 may be mounted to the lower cassette subassembly 310. As the actuators of the first set of actuators 390 are not mechanically connected to the wedges of the wedge assembly 385 in this exemplary cassette assembly 300, said actuators do not function to retract the wedges subsequent to making a penetration-increasing movement thereof. Instead, the second set of actuators 395 is utilized to move the wedges in a penetration-decreasing direction. The actuators of the second set of actuators 395 may or may not be mechanically connected to the wedges of the wedge assembly 385.
The cassette assembly 300 is mounted within a dual-stage leveler with the upper sub-platen 315 of the upper cassette subassembly 305 releasably affixed to the upper platen of the leveler, and the lower sub-platen 355 of the lower cassette subassembly 310 releasably affixed to the lower platen of the leveler. With the cassette assembly so installed to the remainder of a dual-stage leveler, flattening of metal strip material may proceed as described above with respect to
In one exemplary technique for removal of the cassette assembly 300, the upper cassette subassembly 305 is first brought substantially into contact with the lower cassette subassembly 310. Thereafter, both subassembly platens 315, 355 may be detached from the leveler platens and the entire cassette assembly 300 may be rolled or otherwise removed from the associated leveler, such as by means of a moveable cart, etc.
A roll drive system is used to drive the work rolls of a dual-stage leveler, such as but not limited to, the exemplary dual-stage leveler shown in
As would be understood by one of skill in the art, the motors 405, 420 may be coupled to respective gearboxes, such as the multi-output pinion gearboxes 435, 440 shown. Output torque from the gearboxes 435, 440 may be transferred to the work rolls 410, 425 of the respective work roll sets by way of corresponding sets of couplings 445, 450. In this exemplary embodiment, the couplings 445, 450 are flexible in nature to accommodate adjustments in work roll penetration and bending.
Another exemplary roll drive system 500 is schematically depicted in
The motor 505 is coupled to respective first stage and second stage gearboxes, such as the multi-output pinion gearboxes 530, 535 shown. In this exemplary drive embodiment, coupling of the motor 505 to the gearboxes 530, 535 is accomplished by way of a belt drive assembly 540 that includes a drive belt 545, first belt pulley 550 coupled to the motor output, and a second belt pulley 555 coupled to the input of the second stage gearbox 535.
It may again be desirable to operate the second stage work rolls 520 at a rotational speed that is slightly greater than the rotational speed of the first stage work rolls 510 (as explained above). Consequently, the first belt pulley 550 and the second belt pulley 555 of the belt drive assembly 540 may have dissimilar diameters to provide for such a difference in work roll rotational speed.
As in the roll drive system 400 of
It is to be understood that the roll drive systems 400, 500 of
Dual-stage leveler embodiments, such as those described and shown herein, overcome the problems of differential roll speed and resulting internal torque windup that are inherent to known multi-roll leveler designs. Such dual-stage leveler embodiments may also produce other benefits. For example, because all of the work rolls in the first stage of an exemplary dual-stage leveler will be subjected to equal penetration and bending, a larger differential (bending/flattening) path can be achieved with fewer work rolls. Thus, it may be possible to achieve a differential path through a dual-stage leveler with fewer work rolls than would be required to achieve a comparable differential path through a traditional multi-roll leveler. Further, since the problems associated with differential roll speed are eliminated by an exemplary dual-stage leveler, it may be possible to plunge (penetrate) the work rolls of the first leveler stage deeper into the strip material being processed, which should correspondingly produce a greater percent yield of the material with less torque required from the roll drive system.
While certain embodiments of the invention are described in detail above, the scope of the invention is not considered limited by such disclosure, and modifications are possible without departing from the spirit of the invention as evidenced by the following claims:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2949147 | Maust | Aug 1960 | A |
3301031 | Bearer | Jan 1967 | A |
3416340 | Ressor | Dec 1968 | A |
3581536 | Terwillinger | Jun 1971 | A |
3596489 | Ball | Aug 1971 | A |
3701274 | Roesch | Oct 1972 | A |
3875776 | Morooka | Apr 1975 | A |
3902345 | Shida | Sep 1975 | A |
4116029 | Fabian et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4380921 | Matsui | Apr 1983 | A |
4454738 | Buta | Jun 1984 | A |
4633693 | Tahara et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4635458 | Bradlee | Jan 1987 | A |
4651549 | Masui | Mar 1987 | A |
4698990 | Petri et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4715209 | Oshima | Dec 1987 | A |
4726213 | Manchu | Feb 1988 | A |
4730472 | Ellis | Mar 1988 | A |
4881392 | Thompson et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5069054 | Hladky | Dec 1991 | A |
5329798 | Takakura et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5535129 | Keijser | Jul 1996 | A |
5560237 | Yasuda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5680785 | Quehen et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5901591 | Kaplan | May 1999 | A |
6029485 | Bohmer | Feb 2000 | A |
6216517 | Hein | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6338262 | Donini et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6769279 | Bergman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6993947 | Tondo | Feb 2006 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
Gretchen Salois, Technology produces flat material by overcoming defects, Jan. 2013 ModernMetals Magazine p. 2 and 4, Jan. 2013. |
Andritz Herr-Voss Stamco Inc., Enhanced Leveling Technology, http://www.herr-voss.com/enhanced-leveling-techology, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180169726 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |