This invention relates generally to seat belt system, and in particular to multiple point seat belt systems.
Seat belt restraint systems are used to restrict occupant motion during high acceleration events occurring in crashes of both ground and aerospace vehicles. The primary goal is to reduce injury potential caused by occupant flail impact with the vehicle interior, while minimizing injury directly from the restraint belt loading.
A common belt restraint is the 3-point restraint system as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,847,434 to Wemen, which is now used on most commercial automotive platforms. The 3-point restraint includes a lap belt to limit pelvis excursion together with a diagonal torso belt to limit upper torso excursion (torso forward rotation). The load path of the torso belt anchorage points is typically located near or aft of the occupant's back tangent line, which provides a near ideal loading vector to limit upper torso forward rotation. Typically, 3-point restraint systems combine the lap belt and torso belt as a continuous loop with a static anchor near the occupant's hip and a retracting inertia reel anchor near shoulder level on the same side. The belt loop passes through a sliding latch plate that is latched to a single buckle near the occupant's hip on the opposite side. This design simplifies restraint donning, adjustment, and removal. There are three drawbacks to 3 point restraint systems. First, accelerations with a lateral component opposite the upper torso belt mounting point can cause the torso to rotate out of the restraint allowing impact with secondary vehicle structure. Second, tension in the single torso belt can be very high, which can contribute to occupant chest injury (i.e., rib fracture). Third, a continuous webbing loop can cause potential occupant entrapment. This is a concern for vehicles where rapid egress is desired, such as exiting an aircraft after a water ditching or a crash that includes a post-crash fire.
A 4-point restraint adds a second torso belt (one over each shoulder) to prevent upper torso rotation out of the restraint during events with a lateral component in either direction. The second belt also limits localized occupant chest loading as forward inertial loading is reacted by two belts rather than one. The lower anchors of the torso belts are typically mounted to a release buckle near the center of the lap belt. Activation of the buckle releases both torso belts and the lap belt, which eliminates the potential entrapment hazard. However, anchoring the torso belts to the center of the lap belt causes two undesirable consequences. Firstly, the torso belts can lift the center of the lap belt upward, which can allow the occupant's pelvis to rotate under the lap belt during crash loading. This event is referred to as pelvic “submarining,” which can cause serious injury. Secondly, the lower torso belt loading vector is now in front of the occupant's torso so the seat belt net aftward force is reduced, allowing increased upper torso forward rotation. These two undesirable characteristics are exacerbated during aerospace crash events, which often include a combined downward and forward acceleration.
To limit pelvic submarining potential, a tie-down belt can be added from the release buckle to the seat pan passing between the occupant's legs (also called a crotch strap). A restraint with this added belt is commonly referred to as a 5-point restraint. While 5-point restraints minimize the submarining potential, the upper torso belts loading vector still allows extensive torso rotation during a combined forward and vertical acceleration event (crash).
In addition to the suboptimal belt geometry issues, some seat occupants (such as troops sitting in cabin seats) are not familiar with the current 4-point and 5-point restraint systems. Additionally, the shoulder belt mounting (shoulder height near the seat centerline) makes the belts difficult to access, and correctly donning the system requires finding, plugging in and tightening four separate belts. UH-60 crash data (the only U.S. Army helicopter with cabin seat shoulder belts available since inception) showed that only 42 percent of cabin occupants in crashes were wearing the available shoulder belts. In the commercial sector, occupants wearing skirts or similar clothing typically will not don a 5-point restraint as the path for the crotch strap is blocked. In addition, some occupants are fearful of the crotch strap causing groin injuries, even though testing and crash data show this injury mechanism to be unlikely. Ultimately, 5-point restraint systems are typically shunned in the commercial market and typically only used on military platforms or by the automotive racing industry.
The present invention comprises a restraint system with improved belt routing geometry to reduce the occupant's motion and associated injury risk that is intuitive to don with minimal installation instruction. This is critical for platforms where the interior cannot be adequately delethalized and in which the use of supplemental restraints, such as airbags, is impractical.
According to an illustrative embodiment of the invention, the restraint system is donned in a manner similar to standard 3-point restraints used in most automobiles. A side mounted belt with a webbing retractor reel (or inertia reel) on the top mount feeds through a sliding latch plate with a lower terminal belt mount near the intersection of the seat pan and back surface (commonly called the SRP, or Seat Reference Point). The lower terminal belt mount differs from the prior art restraint as it is a releasable fitting, as opposed to a static dead end. After sitting in the seat, the first step to don the restraint is to pull the sliding latch plate across the upper torso and plug it into the release buckle on the opposite side. This action results in a diagonal belt across the torso and a lap belt over the pelvis similar to the standard 3-point restraint system. A second mirror image of the belt is provided on the other side of the seat which is then installed resulting in a crisscross belt pattern over both the torso and the pelvis.
Two methods are provided for removing the restraint in the illustrative embodiment. The first method is to depress a button on each of the plug-in buckles on the sides of the seat, similar to the familiar automotive system, but repeated for each side. The second method is to activate an emergency release handle, which releases both plug-in buckles and both terminal end fittings of the belts. This eliminates the potential belt closed-loop entrapment hazard allowing rapid egress. The entrapment hazard is a particular concern of the aerospace industry due to post-crash fires or drowning hazard after water ditching. After emergency release, the terminal latch ends of the restraint belts would be latched back in place so that the next seat occupant could don the restraint in the familiar automotive fashion, as outlined above.
The illustrative restraint system provides improved restraint through its more direct load paths in the direction of desired restraint, thus reducing the occupant's strike envelope. The benefits of the improved restraint geometry have been successfully demonstrated through dynamic testing. Tests replicating the combined vertical and downward crash pulse of military rotorcraft crash events reduced upper torso motion by 39 percent compared to the current state-of-the-art, 5-point restraint system. In addition, total belt tension was reduced by 28 percent and chest compression reduced by 28 percent.
The present invention will be better understood from a reading of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which like references designate like elements and, in which:
The drawing figures are intended to illustrate the general manner of construction and are not necessarily to scale. In the detailed description and in the drawing figures, specific illustrative examples are shown and herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the drawing figures and detailed description are not intended to limit the invention to the particular form disclosed, but are merely illustrative and intended to teach one of ordinary skill how to make and/or use the invention claimed herein and for setting forth the best mode for carrying out the invention.
With reference to the figures and in particular
With additional reference to
With additional reference to
With additional reference to
With additional reference to
In the illustrative embodiment, control link 58 comprises a Bowden-type cable operating on the release mechanisms of terminal buckles 46, 48 and intermediate buckles 52, 54 by withdrawing a sliding plate in a conventional manner. The release handle 60 is mounted on the right side of the seat pan 50. It is contemplated, however, that release handles could be mounted on either side of the seat pan or under the middle of the seat pan 50 and the control link 58 could comprise any conventional system for simultaneously releasing four mechanical latches including mechanical, electromechanical, magnetic, linear, rotary and the like without departing from the scope of the invention.
Under normal circumstances, restraint system 10 is doffed by releasing intermediate buckles 52, 54 in a conventional manner, e,g, by pressing the release buttons or lifting the latch buckles of intermediate buckles 52, 54 thereby releasing intermediate latch plates 24, 30 only. This will allow seat belts 12, 14 to resume the positions shown in
With additional reference to
With additional reference to
With additional reference to
With additional reference to
As with the illustrative embodiment of
Under normal circumstances, restraint system 100 is doffed by releasing intermediate buckle 128 and terminal buckle 130 in a conventional manner, e,g, by pressing the release buttons or lifting the latch buckles of intermediate buckle 128 and terminal buckle 130 thereby releasing intermediate latch 112 and terminal lath plate 118. This will allow seat belts 102, 104 to resume the positions shown in
Although certain illustrative embodiments and methods have been disclosed herein, it will be apparent from the foregoing disclosure to those skilled in the art that variations and modifications of such embodiments and methods may be made without departing from the invention. For example, although in the illustrative embodiment, webbing retractors are used to adjust the length of the seat belt webbing, a fixed mounting may also be used (together with appropriate belt length adjusters) without departing from the scope of the invention. Additionally, it would be possible to reverse the latch/tongue combinations so that the buckles are mounted on the webbing and the tongues are the anchors and/or mounting retractors on the floor so they act as anchors for the lap portion of the belt without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention should be limited only to the extent required by the appended claims and the rules and principles of applicable law. Additionally, as used herein, references to direction such as “up” or “down” as well as recited materials or methods of attachment are intended to be exemplary and are not considered as limiting the invention and, unless otherwise specifically defined, the terms “generally,” “substantially,” or “approximately” when used with mathematical concepts or measurements mean within ±10 degrees of angle or within 10 percent of the measurement, whichever is greater. As used herein, a step of “providing” a structural element recited in a method claim means and includes obtaining, fabricating, purchasing, acquiring or otherwise gaining access to the structural element for performing the steps of the method. As used herein, the claim terms are to be given their broadest reasonable meaning unless a clear disavowal of that meaning appears in the record in substantially the following form (“As used herein the term______is defined to mean______”)
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63226353 | Jul 2021 | US |