Patent Grant
10697288
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of data transmission along a tubular body, such as a steel pipe. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to the transmission of data along a pipe within a wellbore or along a pipeline, either at the surface or in a body of water.
In the oil and gas industry, it is desirable to obtain data from a wellbore. Several real time data systems have been proposed. One involves the use of a physical cable such as an electrical conductor or a fiber optic cable that is secured to the tubular body. The cable may be secured to either the inner or the outer diameter of the pipe. The cable provides a hard wire connection that allows for real-time transmission of data and the immediate evaluation of subsurface conditions. Further, these cables allow for high data transmission rates and the delivery of electrical power directly to downhole sensors.
It has been proposed to place a physical cable along the outside of a casing string during well completion. However, this can be difficult as the placement of wires along a pipe string requires that thousands of feet of cable be carefully unspooled and fed during pipe connection and run-in. Further, the use of hard wires in a well completion requires the installation of a specially-designed well head that includes through-openings for the wires.
Various wireless technologies have been proposed or developed for downhole communications. Such technologies are referred to in the industry as telemetry. Several examples exist where the installation of wires may be either technically difficult or economically impractical. The use of radio transmission may also be impractical or unavailable in cases where radio-activated blasting is occurring, or where the attenuation of radio waves near the tubular body is significant.
The use of acoustic telemetry has also been suggested. Acoustic telemetry employs an acoustic signal generated at or near the bottomhole assembly or bottom of a pipe string. The signal is transmitted through the wellbore pipe, meaning that the pipe becomes the carrier medium for sound waves. Transmitted sound waves are detected by a receiver and converted to electrical signals for analysis.
In the downhole application of acoustic telemetry wireless networks, communications reliability and range are two highly desirable performance issues. While the use of a single piezoelectric transducer with an associated transceiver offers fabrication advantages, design compromises can impact performance. For example, one major drawback of the single transducer/transceiver design is that both transmitter and receiver performance may be compromised in order to accommodate the single transducer design.
Accordingly, a need exists for alternative electro-acoustic communications node designs, for use in wellbore acoustic telemetry systems, which offer improved communications performance.
The use of piezoelectric transducers in a downhole wireless telemetry system presents further challenges. For example, the fabrication and installation processes associated with a piezoelectric transducer can introduce variability of the transmit and receive sensitivities. A need exists for a method to assess the quality of the piezoelectric transducer and its installation in the acoustic telemetry devices at an early stage of the system fabrication process. Additionally, the ceramic crystals comprising piezoelectric transducers are delicate and subject to breakage in rough conditions typical of downhole environments. Moreover, it is critical that the piezoelectric transducers are attached securely to their respective transmission/reception substrates. Typically an epoxy bond is used to secure the transducers and to provide a good acoustic interface, but the epoxy bond is not always reliable in a downhole environment. Furthermore, the epoxy bond introduces undesirable variability into the performance of the transducer. What is needed is an economical, easy to implement method to secure the transducer to its substrate.
In one aspect, the disclosure provides an apparatus for securing a piezoelectric element in an electroacoustic communications node used in a downhole wireless telemetry system. An end mass is secured to the piezoelectric element. At least one fastener attaches a pre-tensioning support plate to a housing of the node. The pre-tensioning support plate and the at least one fastener impart a tensioning force to the end mass and/or the piezoelectric element when the pre-tensioning support plate and the end mass and/or the piezoelectric element are secured to the housing.
In another aspect, the disclosure provides a method of securing a piezoelectric element in an electroacoustic communications node used in a downhole wireless telemetry system. An end mass is secured to the piezoelectric element. Using at least one fastener, the end mass and piezoelectric element are attached to a housing of the electroacoustic communications node. Using a pre-tensioning support plate and the at least one fastener, a pre-tensioning force is imparted to the end mass and/or the piezoelectric element.
The present disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific exemplary implementations thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific exemplary implementations is not intended to limit the disclosure to the particular forms disclosed herein. This disclosure is to cover all modifications and equivalents as defined by the appended claims. It should also be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating principles of exemplary embodiments of the present invention. Moreover, certain dimensions may be exaggerated to help visually convey such principles. Further where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the drawings to indicate corresponding or analogous elements. Moreover, two or more blocks or elements depicted as distinct or separate in the drawings may be combined into a single functional block or element. Similarly, a single block or element illustrated in the drawings may be implemented as multiple steps or by multiple elements in cooperation. The forms disclosed herein are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Terminology
The words and phrases used herein should be understood and interpreted to have a meaning consistent with the understanding of those words and phrases by those skilled in the relevant art. No special definition of a term or phrase, i.e., a definition that is different from the ordinary and customary meaning as understood by those skilled in the art, is intended to be implied by consistent usage of the term or phrase herein. To the extent that a term or phrase is intended to have a special meaning, i.e., a meaning other than the broadest meaning understood by skilled artisans, such a special or clarifying definition will be expressly set forth in the specification in a definitional manner that provides the special or clarifying definition for the term or phrase.
For example, the following discussion contains a non-exhaustive list of definitions of several specific terms used in this disclosure (other terms may be defined or clarified in a definitional manner elsewhere herein). These definitions are intended to clarify the meanings of the terms used herein. It is believed that the terms are used in a manner consistent with their ordinary meaning, but the definitions are nonetheless specified here for clarity.
A/an: The articles “a” and “an” as used herein mean one or more when applied to any feature in embodiments and implementations of the present invention described in the specification and claims. The use of “a” and “an” does not limit the meaning to a single feature unless such a limit is specifically stated. The term “a” or “an” entity refers to one or more of that entity. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein.
About: As used herein, “about” refers to a degree of deviation based on experimental error typical for the particular property identified. The latitude provided the term “about” will depend on the specific context and particular property and can be readily discerned by those skilled in the art. The term “about” is not intended to either expand or limit the degree of equivalents which may otherwise be afforded a particular value. Further, unless otherwise stated, the term “about” shall expressly include “exactly,” consistent with the discussion below regarding ranges and numerical data.
Above/below: In the following description of the representative embodiments of the invention, directional terms, such as “above”, “below”, “upper”, “lower”, etc., are used for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings. In general, “above”, “upper”, “upward” and similar terms refer to a direction toward the earth's surface along a wellbore, and “below”, “lower”, “downward” and similar terms refer to a direction away from the earth's surface along the wellbore. Continuing with the example of relative directions in a wellbore, “upper” and “lower” may also refer to relative positions along the longitudinal dimension of a wellbore rather than relative to the surface, such as in describing both vertical and horizontal wells.
And/or: The term “and/or” placed between a first entity and a second entity means one of (1) the first entity, (2) the second entity, and (3) the first entity and the second entity. Multiple elements listed with “and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B”, when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” can refer, in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements). As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e. “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or “exactly one of”.
Any: The adjective “any” means one, some, or all indiscriminately of whatever quantity.
At least: As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “at least one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) can refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements). The phrases “at least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” are open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “at least one of A, B, or C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, “one or more of A, B, or C” and “A, B, and/or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together.
Based on: “Based on” does not mean “based only on”, unless expressly specified otherwise. In other words, the phrase “based on” describes both “based only on,” “based at least on,” and “based at least in part on.”
Comprising: In the claims, as well as in the specification, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.
Couple: Any use of any form of the terms “connect”, “engage”, “couple”, “attach”, or any other term describing an interaction between elements is not meant to limit the interaction to direct interaction between the elements and may also include indirect interaction between the elements described.
Determining: “Determining” encompasses a wide variety of actions and therefore “determining” can include calculating, computing, processing, deriving, investigating, looking up (e.g., looking up in a table, a database or another data structure), ascertaining and the like. Also, “determining” can include receiving (e.g., receiving information), accessing (e.g., accessing data in a memory) and the like. Also, “determining” can include resolving, selecting, choosing, establishing and the like.
Embodiments: Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” “some embodiments,” “one aspect,” “an aspect,” “some aspects,” “some implementations,” “one implementation,” “an implementation,” or similar construction means that a particular component, feature, structure, method, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment, aspect, or implementation is included in at least one embodiment and/or implementation of the claimed subject matter. Thus, the appearance of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” or “in some embodiments” (or “aspects” or “implementations”) in various places throughout the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment and/or implementation. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, methods, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or implementations.
Exemplary: “Exemplary” is used exclusively herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments.
Flow diagram: Exemplary methods may be better appreciated with reference to flow diagrams or flow charts. While for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the illustrated methods are shown and described as a series of blocks, it is to be appreciated that the methods are not limited by the order of the blocks, as in different embodiments some blocks may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other blocks from that shown and described. Moreover, less than all the illustrated blocks may be required to implement an exemplary method. In some examples, blocks may be combined, may be separated into multiple components, may employ additional blocks, and so on. In some examples, blocks may be implemented in logic. In other examples, processing blocks may represent functions and/or actions performed by functionally equivalent circuits (e.g., an analog circuit, a digital signal processor circuit, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)), or other logic device. Blocks may represent executable instructions that cause a computer, processor, and/or logic device to respond, to perform an action(s), to change states, and/or to make decisions. While the figures illustrate various actions occurring in serial, it is to be appreciated that in some examples various actions could occur concurrently, substantially in series, and/or at substantially different points in time. In some examples, methods may be implemented as processor executable instructions. Thus, a machine-readable medium may store processor executable instructions that if executed by a machine (e.g., processor) cause the machine to perform a method.
Full-physics: As used herein, the term “full-physics,” “full physics computational simulation,” or “full physics simulation” refers to a mathematical algorithm based on first principles that impact the pertinent response of the simulated system.
May: Note that the word “may” is used throughout this application in a permissive sense (i.e., having the potential to, being able to), not a mandatory sense (i.e., must).
Operatively connected and/or coupled: Operatively connected and/or coupled means directly or indirectly connected for transmitting or conducting information, force, energy, or matter.
Optimizing: The terms “optimal,” “optimizing,” “optimize,” “optimality,” “optimization” (as well as derivatives and other forms of those terms and linguistically related words and phrases), as used herein, are not intended to be limiting in the sense of requiring the present invention to find the best solution or to make the best decision. Although a mathematically optimal solution may in fact arrive at the best of all mathematically available possibilities, real-world embodiments of optimization routines, methods, models, and processes may work towards such a goal without ever actually achieving perfection. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art having benefit of the present disclosure will appreciate that these terms, in the context of the scope of the present invention, are more general. The terms may describe one or more of: 1) working towards a solution which may be the best available solution, a preferred solution, or a solution that offers a specific benefit within a range of constraints; 2) continually improving; 3) refining; 4) searching for a high point or a maximum for an objective; 5) processing to reduce a penalty function; 6) seeking to maximize one or more factors in light of competing and/or cooperative interests in maximizing, minimizing, or otherwise controlling one or more other factors, etc.
Order of steps: It should also be understood that, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, in any methods claimed herein that include more than one step or act, the order of the steps or acts of the method is not necessarily limited to the order in which the steps or acts of the method are recited.
Ranges: Concentrations, dimensions, amounts, and other numerical data may be presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. For example, a range of about 1 to about 200 should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited limits of 1 and about 200, but also to include individual sizes such as 2, 3, 4, etc. and sub-ranges such as 10 to 50, 20 to 100, etc. Similarly, it should be understood that when numerical ranges are provided, such ranges are to be construed as providing literal support for claim limitations that only recite the lower value of the range as well as claims limitation that only recite the upper value of the range. For example, a disclosed numerical range of 10 to 100 provides literal support for a claim reciting “greater than 10” (with no upper bounds) and a claim reciting “less than 100” (with no lower bounds).
As used herein, the term “formation” refers to any definable subsurface region. The formation may contain one or more hydrocarbon-containing layers, one or more non-hydrocarbon containing layers, an overburden, and/or an underburden of any geologic formation.
As used herein, the term “hydrocarbon” refers to an organic compound that includes primarily, if not exclusively, the elements hydrogen and carbon. Examples of hydrocarbons include any form of natural gas, oil, coal, and bitumen that can be used as a fuel or upgraded into a fuel.
As used herein, the term “hydrocarbon fluids” refers to a hydrocarbon or mixtures of hydrocarbons that are gases or liquids. For example, hydrocarbon fluids may include a hydrocarbon or mixtures of hydrocarbons that are gases or liquids at formation conditions, at processing conditions, or at ambient conditions (20° Celsius and 1 atm pressure). Hydrocarbon fluids may include, for example, oil, natural gas, gas condensates, coal bed methane, shale oil, shale gas, and other hydrocarbons that are in a gaseous or liquid state.
As used herein, the terms “series” and “parallel” when referring to the assembly of piezo disks in a stack considers the polarization of the individual elements (the disks) in the stack. In a parallel stack, the electrodes with a consistent polarization are connected together. In a series stack, electrodes with opposite polarization are connected together.
As used herein, the term “potting” refers to the encapsulation of electrical components with epoxy, elastomeric, silicone, or asphaltic or similar compounds for the purpose of excluding moisture or vapors. Potted components may or may not be hermetically sealed.
As used herein, the term “sealing material” refers to any material that can seal a cover of a housing to a body of a housing sufficient to withstand one or more downhole conditions including but not limited to, for example, temperature, humidity, soil composition, corrosive elements, pH, and pressure.
As used herein, the term “sensor” includes any electrical sensing device or gauge. The sensor may be capable of monitoring or detecting pressure, temperature, fluid flow, vibration, resistivity, or other formation data. Alternatively, the sensor may be a position sensor.
As used herein, the term “subsurface” refers to geologic strata occurring below the earth's surface.
The terms “tubular member” or “tubular body” refer to any pipe, such as a joint of casing, a portion of a liner, a drill string, a production tubing, an injection tubing, a pup joint, a buried pipeline, underwater piping, or above-ground piping.
As used herein, the term “wellbore” refers to a hole in the subsurface made by drilling or insertion of a conduit into the subsurface. A wellbore may have a substantially circular cross section, or other cross-sectional shape. As used herein, the term “well,” when referring to an opening in the formation, may be used interchangeably with the term “wellbore.”
The terms “zone” or “zone of interest” refer to a portion of a subsurface formation containing hydrocarbons. The term “hydrocarbon-bearing formation” may alternatively be used.
Description
Specific forms will now be described further by way of example. While the following examples demonstrate certain forms of the subject matter disclosed herein, they are not to be interpreted as limiting the scope thereof, but rather as contributing to a complete description.
Referring first to the derrick 120, the derrick 120 includes a frame structure 121 that extends up from the earth surface 101. The derrick 120 supports drilling equipment including a traveling block 122, a crown block 123 and a swivel 124. A so-called kelly 125 is attached to the swivel 124. The kelly 125 has a longitudinally extending bore (not shown) in fluid communication with a kelly hose 126. The kelly hose 126, also known as a mud hose, is a flexible, steel-reinforced, high-pressure hose that delivers drilling fluid through the bore of the kelly 125 and down into the drill string 160.
The kelly 125 includes a drive section 127. The drive section 127 is non-circular in cross-section and conforms to an opening 128 longitudinally extending through a kelly drive bushing 129. The kelly drive bushing 129 is part of a rotary table. The rotary table is a mechanically driven device that provides clockwise (as viewed from above) rotational force to the kelly 125 and connected drill string 160 to facilitate the process of drilling a borehole 105. Both linear and rotational movement may thus be imparted from the kelly 125 to the drill string 160.
A platform 102 is provided for the derrick 120. The platform 102 extends above the earth surface 101. The platform 102 generally supports rig hands along with various components of drilling equipment such as pumps, motors, gauges, a dope bucket, tongs, pipe lifting equipment and control equipment. The platform 102 also supports the rotary table.
It is understood that the platform 102 shown in
Placed below the platform 102 and the kelly-drive section 127 but above the earth surface 101 is a blow-out preventer, or BOP 130. The BOP 130 is a large, specialized valve or set of valves used to control pressures during the drilling of oil and gas wells. Specifically, blowout preventers control the fluctuating pressures emanating from subterranean formations during a drilling process. The BOP 130 may include upper 132 and lower 134 rams used to isolate flow on the back side of the drill string 160. Blowout preventers 130 also prevent the pipe joints making up the drill string 160 and the drilling fluid from being blown out of the wellbore 150 in the event of a sudden pressure kick.
As shown in
In drilling the wellbore 150, a first string of casing 110 is placed down from the surface 101. This is known as surface casing 110 or, in some instances (particularly offshore), conductor pipe. The surface casing 110 is secured within the formation 155 by a cement sheath 112. The cement sheath 112 resides within an annular region 115 between the surface casing 110 and the surrounding formation 155.
During the process of drilling and completing the wellbore 150, additional strings of casing (not shown) will be provided. These may include intermediate casing strings and a final production casing string. For an intermediate case string or the final production casing, a liner may be employed, that is, a string of casing that is not tied back to the surface 101.
As noted, the wellbore 150 is formed by using a bottomhole assembly 170. The bottomhole assembly 170 allows the operator to control or “steer” the direction or orientation of the wellbore 150 as it is formed. In this instance, the bottomhole assembly 170 is known as a rotary steerable drilling system, or RSS.
The bottomhole assembly 170 will include a drill bit 172. The drill bit 172 may be turned by rotating the drill string 160 from the platform 102. Alternatively, the drill bit 172 may be turned by using so-called mud motors 174. The mud motors 174 are mechanically coupled to and turn the nearby drill bit 172. The mud motors 174 are used with stabilizers or bent subs 176 to impart an angular deviation to the drill bit 172. This, in turn, deviates the well from its previous path in the desired azimuth and inclination.
There are several advantages to directional drilling. These primarily include the ability to complete a wellbore along a substantially horizontal axis of a subsurface formation, thereby exposing a greater formation face. These also include the ability to penetrate into subsurface formations that are not located directly below the wellhead. This is particularly beneficial where an oil reservoir is located under an urban area or under a large body of water. Another benefit of directional drilling is the ability to group multiple wellheads on a single platform, such as for offshore drilling. Finally, directional drilling enables multiple laterals and/or sidetracks to be drilled from a single wellbore in order to maximize reservoir exposure and recovery of hydrocarbons.
The illustrative well site 100 also includes a sensor 178. In some embodiments, the sensor 178 is part of the bottomhole assembly 170. The sensor 178 may be, for example, a set of position sensors that is part of the electronics for an RSS. Alternatively or in addition, the sensor 178 may be a temperature sensor, a pressure sensor, or other sensor for detecting a downhole condition during drilling. Alternatively still, the sensor may be an induction log or gamma ray log or other log that detects fluid and/or geology downhole.
The sensor 178 may be part of a Measurement While Drilling (MWD) or a Logging While Drilling (LWD) assembly. It is observed that the sensor 178 is located above the mud motors 174. This allows the electronic components of the sensor 178 to be spaced apart from the high vibration and centrifugal forces caused by the motors 174, the rotating assembly below the motors, and the formation cutting action created at the bit 172.
Where the sensor 178 is a set of position sensors, the sensors may include three inclinometer sensors and three environmental acceleration sensors. Ideally, a temperature sensor and a wear sensor will also be placed in the drill bit 172. These signals are input into a multiplexer and transmitted.
As the wellbore 150 is being formed, the operator may wish to evaluate the integrity of the cement sheath 112 placed around the surface casing 110 (or other casing string). To do this, the industry has relied upon so-called cement bond logs. As discussed above, a cement bond log (or CBL), uses an acoustic signal that is transmitted by a logging tool at the end of a wireline. The logging tool includes a transmitter, and one or more receivers that “listen” for sound waves generated by the transmitter through the surrounding casing string. The logging tool includes a signal processor that takes a continuous measurement of the amplitude of sound pulses from the transmitter to the receiver. Alternately, the attenuation of the sonic signal may be measured.
In some instances, a bond log will measure acoustic impedance of the material in the annulus directly behind the casing. This may be done through resonant frequency decay. Such logs include, for example, the USIT log of Schlumberger (of Sugar Land, Tex.) and the CAST-V log of Halliburton (of Houston, Tex.).
It is desirable to implement a downhole telemetry system that enables the operator to evaluate cement sheath integrity without need of running a CBL line. This enables the operator to check cement sheath integrity as soon as the cement has set in the annular region 115 or as soon as the wellbore 150 is completed. Additionally or alternatively, one or more sensors (not shown) may be deployed downhole to monitor a wide variety of properties, including, but not limited to, fluid characteristics, temperature, depth, etc., as those skilled in the art will plainly understand.
To do this, the well site 100 includes a plurality of battery-powered intermediate communications nodes 180. The battery-powered intermediate communications nodes 180 may be placed along the outer surface of the surface casing 110 or other tubular supporting the nodes 180, and according to a pre-designated spacing. The battery-powered intermediate communications nodes 180 are configured to receive and then relay acoustic signals along the length of the wellbore 150 in node-to-node arrangement up to the topside communications node 182. The topside communications node 182 is placed closest to the surface 101. The topside communications node 182 is configured to receive acoustic signals and convert them to electrical or optical signals. The topside communications node 182 may be above grade or below grade. Below grade communication nodes are typically installed while the casing tubular are above grade, prior to the insertion of the casing tubulars into the wellbore.
The nodes may also include a sensor communications node 184. The sensor communications node is placed closest to the sensor 178. The sensor communications node 184 is configured to communicate with the downhole sensor 178, and then send a wireless signal using an acoustic wave.
The well site 100 of
The processor 192 may include discrete logic, any of various integrated circuit logic types, or a microprocessor. In any event, the processor 192 may be incorporated into a computer having a screen. The computer may have a separate keyboard 194, as is typical for a desk-top computer, or an integral keyboard as is typical for a laptop or a personal digital assistant. In one aspect, the processor 192 is part of a multi-purpose “smart phone” having specific “apps” and wireless connectivity. As indicated, the intermediate communications nodes 180 of the downhole telemetry system are typically powered by batteries and, as such, system energy limitations can be encountered. Power management must be considered in system design and optimization.
As has been described hereinabove,
Referring first to the well head 260, the well head 260 may be any arrangement of pipes or valves that receive reservoir fluids at the top of the well. In the arrangement of
It is understood that rather than using a Christmas tree, the well head 260 may alternatively include a motor (or prime mover) at the surface 201 that drives a pump. The pump, in turn, reciprocates a set of sucker rods and a connected positive displacement pump (not shown) downhole. The pump may be, for example, a rocking beam unit or a hydraulic piston pumping unit. Alternatively still, the well head 260 may be configured to support a string of production tubing having a downhole electric submersible pump, a gas lift valve, or other means of artificial lift (not shown). The present inventions are not limited by the configuration of operating equipment at the surface unless expressly noted in the claims.
Referring next to the wellbore 250, the wellbore 250 has been completed with a series of pipe strings referred to as casing. First, a string of surface casing 210 has been cemented into the formation. Cement is shown in an annular bore 215 of the wellbore 250 around the casing 210. The cement is in the form of an annular sheath 212. The surface casing 110 (
Next, at least one intermediate string of casing 220 is cemented into the wellbore 250. The intermediate string of casing 220 is in sealed fluid communication with the upper master valve 262. A cement sheath 212 is again shown in a bore 215 of the wellbore 250. The combination of the casing 210/220 and the cement sheath 212 in the bore 215 strengthens the wellbore 250 and facilitates the isolation of formations behind the casing 210/220.
It is understood that a wellbore 250 may, and typically will, include more than one string of intermediate casing. In some instances, an intermediate string of casing may be a liner.
Finally, a production string 230 is provided. The production string 230 is hung from the intermediate casing string 230 using a liner hanger 231. The production string 230 is a liner that is not tied back to the surface 201. In the arrangement of
The production liner 230 has a lower end 234 that extends to an end 254 of the wellbore 250. For this reason, the wellbore 250 is said to be completed as a cased-hole well. Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that for production purposes, the liner 230 may be perforated after cementing to create fluid communication between a bore 235 of the liner 230 and the surrounding rock matrix making up the subsurface formation 255. In one aspect, the production string 230 is not a liner but is a casing string that extends back to the surface.
As an alternative, end 254 of the wellbore 250 may include joints of sand screen (not shown). The use of sand screens with gravel packs allows for greater fluid communication between the bore 235 of the liner 230 and the surrounding rock matrix while still providing support for the wellbore 250. In this instance, the wellbore 250 would include a slotted base pipe as part of the sand screen joints. Of course, the sand screen joints would not be cemented into place and would not include subsurface communications nodes.
The wellbore 250 optionally also includes a string of production tubing 240. The production tubing 240 extends from the well head 260 down to the subsurface formation 255. In the arrangement of
It is also noted that the bottom end 234 of the production string 230 is completed substantially horizontally within the subsurface formation 255. This is a common orientation for wells that are completed in so-called “tight” or “unconventional” formations. Horizontal completions not only dramatically increase exposure of the wellbore to the producing rock face, but also enables the operator to create fractures that are substantially transverse to the direction of the wellbore. Those of ordinary skill in the art may understand that a rock matrix will generally “part” in a direction that is perpendicular to the direction of least principal stress. For deeper wells, that direction is typically substantially vertical. However, the present inventions have equal utility in vertically completed wells or in multi-lateral deviated wells.
As with the well site 100 of
The nodes first include a topside communications node 282. The topside communications node 282 is placed closest to the surface 201. The topside node 282 is configured to transmit and receive acoustic signals. The topside node may be in communication with the surface communications and/or processors by any convenient means, such as but not limited to direct wired, wireless, acoustic, fiber optic, radio, cellular, or wireless.
In some embodiments, the nodes may also include a sensor communications node 284, located downhole, along the system communications path, and/or at or proximate the topside. Sensor communications nodes may be in one-way, two-way, passive, and/or active communication with one or more sensors. Sensors and/or sensor communications nodes may be locate inside of the wellbore tubulars, within wellbore tubulars, external to the wellbore tubulars, affixed to a wellbore tubular, or be conveyable within the wellbore such as via a tubing string, coil tubing, wireline, electrical wireline, autonomously, or pumped in by a fluid. The sensor communications node 284 may be placed near one or more sensors 290. Sensor communications node 284 is configured to communicate with the one or more downhole sensors 290, and then send a wireless signal pertaining to data from the sensor using acoustic waves and the transducers and acoustic telemetry system disclosed herewith.
The sensors 290 may be, for example, pressure sensors, flow meters, or temperature sensors. A pressure sensor may be, for example, a sapphire gauge or a quartz gauge. Sapphire gauges can be used as they are considered more rugged for the high-temperature downhole environment. Alternatively, the sensors may be microphones for detecting ambient noise, or geophones (such as a tri-axial geophone) for detecting the presence of micro-seismic activity. Alternatively still, the sensors may be fluid flow measurement devices such as a spinners, or fluid composition sensors.
In addition, the nodes include a plurality of subsurface battery-powered intermediate communications nodes 280. Each of the subsurface battery-powered intermediate communications nodes 280 is configured to receive and then relay acoustic signals along essentially the length of the wellbore 250. For example, the subsurface battery-powered intermediate communications nodes 280 can utilize electro-acoustic transducers to receive and relay mechanical or acoustical waves.
The subsurface battery-powered intermediate communications nodes 280 transmit signals as acoustic waves. The acoustic waves can be at a frequency of, for example, between about 50 kHz and 500 kHz. The signals are delivered up to the topside communications node 282 so that signals indicative of cement integrity are sent from node-to-node. A last subsurface battery-powered intermediate communications node 280 transmits the signals acoustically to the topside communications node 282. Communication may be between adjacent nodes or may skip nodes depending on node spacing or communication range. Preferably, communication is routed around nodes which are not functioning properly.
The well site 200 of
The signals may be received by the processor 272 through a wire (not shown) such as a co-axial cable, a fiber optic cable, a USB cable, or other electrical or optical communications wire. Alternatively, the receiver 270 may receive the final signals from the topside node 282 wirelessly through a modem, microwave, radio, optical, or other transceiver. Receiver 270 may also be a transmitter that can transmit commands to topside node 282 or directly to other in-range nodes (electrically, acoustically, wirelessly, or otherwise), which the topside node 282 or other topside receiving node may then in turn transmit the command downhole acoustically along the transducer communication chain to a designated downhole receiving node or transducer.
In each of
Referring now to
As noted, the illustrative intermediate communications node 380 is shown exploded away from the tubular section 310. The intermediate communications node 380 is structured and arranged to attach to the wall 314 of the tubular section 310 at a selected location. In one aspect, selected tubular sections 310 will each have an intermediate communications node 380 between the box end 318 and the pin end 322. In one arrangement, the intermediate communications node 380 is placed anywhere along wall 314 but typically not immediately adjacent the box end 318 or, alternatively, not immediately adjacent the pin end 322 of every tubular section 310. In another arrangement, the intermediate communications node 380 is placed at a distance-selected location, such as along every second or every third tubular section 310. In some circumstances, intermediate node spacing may even be greater than two or three tubular joints. In other aspects, more or less than one intermediate communications node 380 may be placed per tubular section 310.
In some embodiments, the intermediate communications node 380 shown in
There are benefits to the use of an externally-placed communications node that uses acoustic waves. For example, such a node will not interfere with the flow of fluids within the internal bore 316 of the tubular section 310. Further, installation and mechanical attachment can be readily assessed or adjusted, as necessary.
As shown in
The intermediate communications node 380 is intended to represent the plurality of intermediate communications nodes 180 of
Exemplary
In some embodiments, the second electro-acoustic transducer 336, configured to serve as a transmitter, of intermediate communications nodes 380 may also produce acoustic telemetry signals. In some embodiments, an electrical signal is delivered to the second electro-acoustic transducer 336, such as through a driver circuit. In some embodiments, the acoustic waves represent asynchronous packets of information comprising a plurality of separate tones.
In some embodiments, the acoustic telemetry data transfer is accomplished using multiple frequency shift keying (MFSK). Any extraneous noise in the signal is moderated by using well-known analog and/or digital signal processing methods. This noise removal and signal enhancement may involve conveying the acoustic signal through a signal conditioning circuit using, for example, a bandpass filter.
The signal generated by the second electro-acoustic transducer 336 then passes through the housing 386 to the tubular body 310, and propagates along the tubular body 310 to other intermediate communications nodes 380. In one aspect, the acoustic signal is generated by a different communications node via second electro-acoustic transducer 336 and received by the first electro-acoustic receiver transducer 388 in a different node. The transmitter and receiver transducers within the same node do not typically communicate directly acoustically with each other. Electronic circuits are provided within a node to connect the common transducers and receivers within a node. A processor within the node provides this electrical interface to continue the telemetry communication from the node's receiver, through the node to the transmitter transducer, and acoustic transmission onward from the node. In some embodiments, the electro-acoustic transducers 336 and 388 may be magnetostrictive transducers comprising a coil wrapped around a core. In another aspect, the acoustic signal may be generated and/or received by a piezoelectric ceramic transducers. In either case, the electrically encoded data are transformed into a sonic wave that is carried through the wall 314 of the tubular body 310 in the wellbore.
In some embodiments, the internal components of intermediate communications nodes 380 may also be provided with a protective layer 340. The protective layer 340 encapsulates the electronics circuit board 338, the cable 334, the battery 390, and transducers 336 and 388. This protective layer may provide additional mechanical durability and moisture isolation. The protective layer 340 may be internal or external to the housing 386. The intermediate communications nodes 380 may also be fluid sealed with the housing 386 to protect the internal electronics from exposure to undesirable fluids and/or to maintain dielectric integrity within the voids of a housing. Another form of protection for the internal components is available using a potting material, typically but not necessarily in combination with an outer protective housing, such as a steel housing.
In some embodiments, the intermediate communications nodes 380 may also optionally include a shoe 342. More specifically, the intermediate communications nodes 380 may include a pair of shoes 342 disposed at opposing ends of the wall 330. Each of the shoes 342 provides a beveled face that helps prevent the node 380 from hanging up on an external tubular body or the surrounding earth formation, as the case may be, during run-in or pull-out. The shoes 342 may also have an optional friction reducing coating, a hard-banding coating, or a cushioning material (not shown) as an outer layer 340 for protecting against sharp impacts and friction with the borehole to protect housing internal components from damage. In some embodiments, such as where the housing is flush mounted or counter sunk or otherwise protectively enclosed, the beveled shoes 342 may not be necessary, although in the illustrated embodiments, the shoes also serve to provide a solid attachment and contact interface for acoustic signal transfer between the tubular and the housing.
The housing 402 is dimensioned to be strong enough to protect internal electronics. In one aspect, the housing 402 has an outer wall 404 that may be about 0.2 inches (0.51 cm) in thickness. A cavity 406 houses the electronics, including, by way of example and not of limitation, a battery 408, a power supply wire 410, two transducers 412 and 416, and a circuit board 414. The circuit board 414 will preferably include a micro-processor or electronics module that processes acoustic signals for both transmission and reception. An electro-acoustic transducer 416 is provided as the receiver to convert acoustical energy to electrical energy and is coupled with outer wall 404 on the side attached to the tubular body. An electro-acoustic transducer 412 is used as the transmitter to convert electrical energy to acoustical energy. The transducers 412 and 416 are in electrical communication via circuit board 414 with at least one sensor 418, which may be the at least one sensor 178 of
Referring now to
In one aspect, the housing 502 may have an outer wall 504 that may be about 0.2 inches (0.51 cm) in thickness. A cavity 506 houses the electronics, including, by way of example and not of limitation, a battery 508, a power supply wire 510, transducers 512 and 516, a circuit board 514 with processor, memory, and power control components. The circuit board 514 will preferably include a micro-processor or electronics module that processes acoustic signals for both transmission and reception. An electro-acoustic transducer 516 is provided as the receiver to convert acoustical energy to electrical energy and is coupled with outer wall 504 on the side attached to the tubular body. An electro-acoustic transducer 512 is configured as the transmitter to convert electrical energy to acoustical energy. Transducers 512 and 516 are in electrical communication with circuit board 514 and that subsystem is in acoustic communication with at least one sensor 518. A dashed line is provided showing an extended connection between the at least one sensor 518 and the electro-acoustic transducers 512 and 516.
In operation, the sensor communications node 584 is in electrical communication with the (one or more) sensors. This may be by means of a wire, acoustics, or by means of wireless communication such as infrared or radio waves. The sensor communications node 584 may be configured to receive signals from the sensors. In some applications, the sensors may also be configured to transmit signals to an operable or recording device.
The sensor communications node 584 transmits signals from the sensors as acoustic waves. The acoustic waves can be at a frequency band of for example, from about 50 kHz to about 500 kHz, from about 50 kHz to about 300 kHz, from about 60 kHz to about 200 kHz, from about 65 kHz to about 175 kHz, from about 70 kHz to about 160 kHz, from about 75 kHz to about 150 kHz, from about 80 kHz to about 140 kHz, from about 85 kHz to about 135 kHz, from about 90 kHz to about 130 kHz, or from about 100 kHz to about 125 kHz, or about 100 kHz. The signals are received by an intermediate communications node, such as intermediate communications node 380 of
As indicated above, for downhole intermediate communications transmission, it has been determined that the herein described dual transducer design principles described herein provide improved performance as compared to single transducer communications systems. Most preferred intermediate communications nodes, such as described herein, are of a dual transducer design. A generally preferential design comprises two transducers associated with a housing or communication node: one serving as a transmitter and another serving as a receiver. Acoustic transmission performance optimization may be achieved by a combination of: 1) customizing the electrical impedance matching to the specific transducer; 2) geometric and material selection of the transducer to maximize the desired acoustic qualities; and/or 3) optimized pre-tensioning (pre-loading) of each individual transducer for the expected transmission frequency band.
It will be understood that the one transducer serving as a transmitter may actually comprise multiple transmitter transducers at a single node, such as in a set of transducers serving in that capacity. Similarly, the one transducer serving as a receiver may actually include a set of multiple receivers at a node. However, for simplicity and efficiency, a dual transducer design utilizing a single transducer may be preferred for each of the transmitting and receiving functions at a node. The dual transducer design provides optimal overall performance as an intermediate communication node and through individual optimization offers extended effective acoustic transmission range, although a single electronic board may be used to operate both the transmitter and receiver, separate electronic circuits for each may be desired to separately optimize the performance of each of transmission and receiving respectively. Nonetheless, in some embodiments, some of the electrical components may be shared or used for both transmit and receive functions, where such shared use significantly improves overall efficiency and does not overly sub-optimize either of the transmitter or receiver transducer performance.
In addition to improved communication performance, the dual transducer design may provide such advanced benefits as: a) the transmitter and receiver may be designed and used as a pair of active sensing devices for measurement of physical parameters of interest, such as material surrounding the node, flow velocity, casing corrosion, or the like; b) the transmitter and receiver pair may be designed and used to provide advanced diagnostic information for the communication sensor node itself.
Referring now to
Ydisk=dp·Vt0
Where dp is the piezo charge constant. The total amplitude of the displacement of parallel multi-disk stack is approximately:
Ytotal=nYdisk=n·dpVt0
where n is the number of disks. Clearly, the mechanical output of the piezo stack can be increased by increasing the number of disks while applying the same voltage. For the same output required, more disks allow using a lower driving voltage from MFSK generator 610.
Referring now to
Vdisk=gp·h·F0/A
where gp is the piezo voltage constant, and A is the disk surface. The overall voltage output of a series of multiple disks is approximately:
Vr0=m·Vdisk=m·gp·h·F0/A
where m is the number of disks. In theory, a thick disk with thickness of L=m·h will perform equally well as multiple disks in series. Therefore, we could increase the thickness of a single disk or number of disks of the same thickness to boost the receiver voltage output. With higher voltage output at a given vibration signal, the receiver 710 sensitivity increases, which will improve detection accuracy or increase the communication range.
In some piezoelectric embodiments, the transmit and/or receive transducer stacks may be fitted with an end mass 606 and/or 706, respectively, to enhance transmission output or receiver sensitivity. The end mass(es) may assist to properly time reflections, enhance amplitude properties, to improve the piezo performance. With separate transmit and receive transducers, the end mass lengths can be individually selected to optimize overall acoustic performance. For example, it may be desired to increase the overall bandwidth for the telemetry frequencies. The end mass lengths may be designed to operate off of or to reduce or enhance the resonance piezoelectric disk resonance frequencies. For further example, the transmit end mass length may be reduced to slightly increase the resonance frequency and the receiver end mass length can be increased to slightly decrease the resonance frequency. Additional performance customization may be achieved with combined collective adjustments to both the electrical impedance matching circuits and the end mass adjustments. With separate transmit and receive transducers, four independent adjustments are available compared to just two with a single transmit/receive transducer. Performance parameters such as power consumption, signal to noise ratio, and bandwidth may be adjusted to improve telemetry and battery life.
In some embodiments, the electronic circuit for the transmitter 600 (
In an exemplary embodiment, the end mass and/or piezo stack are pre-tensioned (pre-loaded or pre-stressed, or pre-strained). In the illustrated embodiment, the stack and end mass are pre-tensioned to the housing. Pre-tensioning may provide multiple benefits or options, such as for example, the output of the transmit stack may be enhanced receiver sensitivity may be increased mechanical durability may be improved, consistent fabrication installation, and/or long term device performance may be more stable.
As depicted in
As presented in
As shown in
Testing has demonstrated considerable mechanical durability utilizing the pre-tensioning arrangement illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, the assembly fabrication confirms that piezo stacks with end mass, batteries, and electronics are each functioning according to specification prior to installation in the node housing. For example, piezo stacks can be tested for impedance and Dp (piezo charge constant). A critical fabrication step is the attachment of the piezo stack to the housing. Although the pre-tensioning mechanism described in
Typically, the same physical device can be used as the transducer of known quality for the transmitting and receiving tests. In an exemplary embodiment, a specific position for the attachment of the transducer of known quality 1130 is established on housing 1100. The temporary attachment to the housing is achieved with a spring clamp or similar device allowing a repeatable applied force to hold in place the transducer of known quality 1130 and includes the application of a consistent acoustic couplant. The transmitting and receiving tests can be conducted without removing transducer 1130. Several repeated tests with removal and reattachment of transducer 1130 on the same housing establish an experimental repeatability band. Repeating this sort of testing on several housings establishes an overall experimental and hardware range for the results. Since the nature of this testing is to assess the quality of the acoustic attachment of transducer stacks 1110 and 1120 to the housing, the amplitude of the frequency response is the primary parameter of interest.
There is no unique methodology for determining the acceptance, rejection, and baseline criteria. In an exemplary embodiment, the excitation test frequencies from device 1140 are coincident with the anticipated telemetry frequencies. The repeated testing methodology is adequate to determine piezo stacks that have a defective bond.
After nodes are tested with the methodology described in
It is recognized that although many electro-acoustic transducer embodiments disclosed herein refer to “piezoelectric” type transducers, the electro-acoustic transducers included herein may also or alternatively be other electro-mechanical or electro-kinetic type of electro-acoustic transducers such as magnetostriction, electrostriction, and/or magnetostrictive transducers. These other types of transducers may be suitable in some embodiments and are recognized as included within this disclosure and may also be utilized either in combination with or in substitution for piezoelectric type of transducers (including receive and/or transmit transducers). Similarly, sensors may be utilized with the presently disclosed technology may utilize digital, analog, wireless, optical, thermal, mechanical, electrical, and/or chemical types of sensor technology may be as included herewith to supply data for incorporation into and telemetry by the data telemetry systems as disclosed herein, where they may be transmitted to a process or end-user for collection, further processing, analysis and/or use.
Referring now to
In some embodiments, the piezoelectric transmitter includes multiple piezoelectric disks, each piezoelectric disk having at least a pair of electrodes connected in parallel with an adjacent piezoelectric disk. In some embodiments, the piezoelectric receiver comprises multiple piezoelectric disks, each piezoelectric disk having at least a pair of electrodes connected in series with an adjacent piezoelectric disk. In some embodiments, the method 800 further includes 816, sending an acoustic signal from the piezoelectric transmitter of the electro-acoustic communications node; and 818, determining from the acoustic response of the piezoelectric receiver of the electro-acoustic communications node a physical parameter of the hydrocarbon well. In some embodiments, the method further includes relaying information 820, this at a different time, and 822, measuring the change in acoustic response to determine whether a physical change in hydrocarbon well conditions has occurred.
In some aspects, the improved technology includes an electro-acoustic communications node for a downhole wireless telemetry system, comprising a housing having a mounting face for mounting to a surface of a tubular body, a receiver transducer positioned within the housing, the transducer receiver structured and arranged to receive acoustic waves that propagate through the tubular member, a transmitter transducer positioned within the housing, the transmitter transducer structured and arranged to retransmit the received acoustic waves through the tubular member to another receiver transducer; and a power source comprising one or more batteries positioned within the housing powering electronics circuits interfaced to the transmitter and receiver transducers. Each communication node includes a transmitter transducer and a receiver transducer. The transducer may be in a common physical housing or in a separate adjacent physical housing, but even if in an adjacent physical housing, the adjacent housings may considered a common housing for purposes herein.
In some embodiments, the transducers may be piezoelectric devices while in other embodiments, the transducers may be magnetostrictive devices, while in still other embodiments the transducers may be a combination of both piezo and magnetostrictive devices.
In some embodiments, the transducers and electronic circuits in a housing may merely repeat the received acoustic waves as acoustically interpreted and then retransmit the received and interpreted waves by the transmitter associated with that housing, much like a common radio repeater transmitter transmits radio waves from one communications tower to another, in series. In other embodiments, the electronic circuits may actually decode the acoustic signal message received by the receiver associated with a housing, for example to determine whether an instruction is included, and then recode the message for retransmission by the transmitter associated with that respective housing to the next receiver or another receiver associated with another housing.
The hardware and procedure of
Moreover, the geometry of the node enables exceptionally reproducible attachment positioning of the test block. In general, the test block could be fabricated with a single transducer for both transmit and receive operations. The dual transducer configuration is chosen only to be consistent with available hardware. The convex to concave mating is designed for the structure of the disclosed node hardware. The only constraint is that the test block must mate securely and repeatedly to the node under test.
With the hardware test apparatus 1400 attached to the node 1408 as shown in
Depending on the hardware and software capabilities of the node, it may also be possible to quantitatively assess the node receiver transducer 1404. For this case, block 1406 transmits a pre-established signal (frequency and amplitude) to node 1408. In order to provide a quantitative assessment of the received signal, the node would need to have a means to assess the received tonal amplitudes and transmit that result back to block 1406. The measured result is transmitted using, for example, the on-board node telemetry to the temporarily attached block 1406. Electronics attached to the temporarily attached transducer(s) would be required to decipher the telemetry containing the information about the reception amplitude. In this case, the amplitude information may be actual peak or rms amplitude or may be some other parameter related to the quality of the reception by node receiver transducer 1404.
The apparatus and methods disclosed with respect to
An example of the results of using the hardware test apparatus to test two piezo nodes 1708, 1710 can be shown in
The method shown in
Further illustrative, non-exclusive examples of systems and methods according to the present disclosure are presented in the following enumerated paragraphs. It is within the scope of the present disclosure that an individual step of a method recited herein, including in the following enumerated paragraphs, may additionally or alternatively be referred to as a “step for” performing the recited action.
1. An apparatus for securing a piezoelectric element in an electroacoustic communications node used in a downhole wireless telemetry system, comprising:
The apparatus and methods disclosed herein are applicable to the wellbore and pipeline industries, such as but not limited to the oil and gas industry and fluid processing and transmission industries. It is believed that the disclosure and claims set forth herein encompasses multiple distinct inventions with independent utility. While each of these inventions has been disclosed in a generalized or preferred form, the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein are not to be considered in a limiting sense as numerous variations are possible. The subject matter of the inventions includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and subcombinations of the various elements, features, functions and/or properties disclosed herein. Similarly, where the claims recite “a” or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof, such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.
It is believed that the following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations that are directed to one of the disclosed inventions and are novel and non-obvious. Inventions embodied in other combinations and subcombinations of features, functions, elements and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such amended or new claims, whether they are directed to a different invention or directed to the same invention, whether different, broader, narrower, or equal in scope to the original claims, are also regarded as included within the subject matter of the inventions of the present disclosure.
While the present invention has been described and illustrated by reference to particular embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention lends itself to variations not necessarily illustrated herein. For this reason, then, reference should be made solely to the appended claims for purposes of determining the true scope of the present invention.
This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,152, filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Dual Transducer Communications Node Including Piezo Pre-Tensioning for Acoustic Wireless Networks and Method Employing Same,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein. This application is related to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/428,367, filed Nov. 30, 2016, entitled “Dual Transducer Communications Node for Downhole Acoustic Wireless Networks and Method Employing Same,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/666,292, filed Aug. 1, 2017, titled “Dual Transducer Communications Node For Downhole Acoustic Wireless Networks and Method Employing Same,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/381,330, filed Aug. 30, 2016, entitled “Communication Networks, Relay Nodes for Communication Networks, and Methods of Transmitting Data Among a Plurality of Relay Nodes,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/665,931, filed Aug. 1, 2017, entitled “Communication Networks, Relay Nodes for Communication Networks, and Methods of Transmitting Data Among a Plurality of Relay Nodes,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/428,374, filed Nov. 30, 2016, entitled “Hybrid Downhole Acoustic Wireless Network,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/666,299, filed Aug. 1, 2017, entitled “Hybrid Downhole Acoustic Wireless Network,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/428,385, filed Nov. 30, 2016 entitled “Methods of Acoustically Communicating And Wells That Utilize The Methods,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/433,491, filed Dec. 13, 2016 entitled “Methods of Acoustically Communicating And Wells That Utilize The Methods,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/666,324, filed Aug. 1, 2017 entitled “Methods of Acoustically Communicating and Wells that Utilize the Methods,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/428,394, filed Nov. 30, 2016, entitled “Downhole Multiphase Flow Sensing Methods,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/666,328, filed Aug. 1, 2017, entitled “Downhole Multiphase Flow Sensing Methods,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/428,425 filed Nov. 30, 2016, entitled “Acoustic Housing for Tubulars,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/666,334 filed Aug. 1, 2017 entitled “Acoustic Housing for Tubulars” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/689,182 filed Aug. 29, 2017, entitled “Acoustic Housing for Tubulars,” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. This application is related to U.S. Provisional Applications having common inventors and assignee and filed on an even date herewith, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,146, filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Method and System For Performing Operations Using Communications,”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,142, filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Method And System For Performing Communications Using Aliasing,”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,147, filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Method and System For Performing Operations With Communications,”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,201, filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Method And System For Performing Wireless Communications Along A Drilling String,”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,211 filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Method and System for Performing Hydrocarbon Operations With Mixed Communication Networks”, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,201 filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Dual Transducer Communications Node Including Piezo Pre-Tensioning for Acoustic Wireless Networks and Method Employing Same,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/572,152 filed Oct. 13, 2017 entitled “Method And System For Performing Wireless Communications Along A Drilling String” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3103643 | Kalbfell | Sep 1963 | A |
| 3205477 | Kalbfell | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3512407 | Zill | May 1970 | A |
| 3637010 | Malay et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3741301 | Malay et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3781783 | Tucker | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3790930 | Lamel et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3900827 | Lamel et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3906434 | Lamel et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 4001773 | Lamel et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4283780 | Nardi | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4298970 | Shawhan et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4302826 | Kent et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4314365 | Peterson et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4884071 | Howard | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4962489 | Medlin et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5128901 | Drumheller | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5136613 | Dumestre, III | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5166908 | Montgomery | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5182946 | Boughner et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5234055 | Cornette | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5283768 | Rorden | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5373481 | Orban et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5468025 | Adinolfe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5480201 | Mercer | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5495230 | Lian | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5569240 | Campbell | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5592438 | Rorden et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5667650 | Face et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5850369 | Rorden et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857146 | Kido | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5924499 | Birchak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5960883 | Tubel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5995449 | Green et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6049508 | Deflandre | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6125080 | Sonnenschein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128250 | Reid et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6177882 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6236850 | Desai | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239690 | Burbidge et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6300743 | Patino et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6320820 | Gardner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324904 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6360769 | Brisco | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6394184 | Tolman et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6400646 | Shah et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6429784 | Beique et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6462672 | Besson | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6543538 | Tolman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6670880 | Hall et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6679332 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6695277 | Gallis | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6702019 | Dusterhoft et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6717501 | Hall et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6727827 | Edwards et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6772837 | Dusterhoft et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6816082 | Laborde | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6868037 | Dasgupta et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6880634 | Gardner et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6883608 | Parlar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6899178 | Tubel | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6909667 | Shah et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6912177 | Smith | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6920085 | Finke et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6930616 | Tang et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6940392 | Chan et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6940420 | Jenkins | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953094 | Ross et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6956791 | Dopf et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6980929 | Aronstam et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6987463 | Beique et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7006918 | Economides et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011157 | Costley et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7036601 | Berg et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051812 | McKee et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7064676 | Hall et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7082993 | Ayoub et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7090020 | Hill et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7140434 | Chouzenoux et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7219762 | James et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7224288 | Hall et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228902 | Oppelt | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7249636 | Ohmer | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252152 | LoGiudice et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7257050 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7261154 | Hall et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7261162 | Deans et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7275597 | Hall et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7277026 | Hall et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| RE40032 | van Bokhorst et al. | Jan 2008 | E |
| 7317990 | Sinha et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7321788 | Addy et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7322416 | Burris, II et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7325605 | Fripp et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7339494 | Shah et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7348893 | Huang et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7385523 | Thomeer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7387165 | Lopez de Cardenas et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7411517 | Flanagan | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7477160 | Lemenager et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7516792 | Lonnes et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7551057 | King et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7590029 | Tingley | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7595737 | Fink et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7602668 | Liang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7649473 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7750808 | Masino et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7775279 | Marya et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7787327 | Tang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7819188 | Auzerais et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7828079 | Oothoudt | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831283 | Ogushi et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7913773 | Li et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7952487 | Montebovi | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7994932 | Huang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004421 | Clark | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8044821 | Mehta | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8049506 | Lazarev | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8115651 | Camwell et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8117907 | Han et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8157008 | Lilley | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8162050 | Roddy et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8220542 | Whitsitt et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8237585 | Zimmerman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8242928 | Prammer | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8276674 | Lopez de Cardenas et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8284075 | Fincher et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8284947 | Giesbrecht et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8316936 | Roddy et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8330617 | Chen et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8347982 | Hannegan et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8358220 | Savage | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8376065 | Teodorescu et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8381822 | Hales et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8388899 | Mitani et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8411530 | Slocum et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8434354 | Crow et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8494070 | Luo et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8496055 | Mootoo et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8539890 | Tripp et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8544564 | Moore et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8552597 | Song et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8556302 | Dole | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8559272 | Wang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8596359 | Grigsby et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8605548 | Froelich | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8607864 | Mcleod et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8664958 | Simon | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8672875 | Vanderveen et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8675779 | Zeppetelle et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8683859 | Godager | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8689621 | Godager | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8701480 | Eriksen | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8750789 | Baldemair et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8787840 | Srinivasan et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8805632 | Coman et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8826980 | Neer | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8833469 | Purkis | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8893784 | Abad | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8910716 | Newton et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8994550 | Millot et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8995837 | Mizuguchi et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9062508 | Huval et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9062531 | Jones | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9075155 | Luscombe et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9078055 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9091153 | Yang et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9133705 | Angeles Boza | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9140097 | Themig et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9144894 | Barnett et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9206645 | Hallundbaek | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9279301 | Lovorn et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9284819 | Tolman et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9284834 | Alteirac et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9310510 | Godager | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9333350 | Rise et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9334696 | Hay | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9359841 | Hall | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9363605 | Goodman et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9376908 | Ludwig et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9441470 | Guerrero et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9515748 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9557434 | Keller et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9617829 | Dale et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9617850 | Fripp et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9631485 | Keller et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9657564 | Stolpman | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9664037 | Logan et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 9670773 | Croux | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9683434 | Machocki | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9686021 | Merino | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9715031 | Contant et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9721448 | Wu et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9759062 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9816373 | Howell et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9822634 | Gao | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9863222 | Morrow et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9879525 | Morrow et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9945204 | Ross et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9963955 | Tolman et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10100635 | Keller et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10103846 | van Zelm et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10132149 | Morrow et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10145228 | Yarus et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10167716 | Clawson et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10167717 | Deffenbaugh et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10190410 | Clawson et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10196862 | Li-Leger et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 20020180613 | Shi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030056953 | Tumlin et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117896 | Sakuma et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040020063 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040200613 | Fripp et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040239521 | Zierolf | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050269083 | Burris, II et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284659 | Hall et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060033638 | Hall et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041795 | Gabelmann et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060090893 | Sheffield | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070139217 | Beique et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070146351 | Katsurahira et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156359 | Varsamis et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070219758 | Bloomfield | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070272411 | Lopez de Cardenas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080030365 | Fripp et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110644 | Howell et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080185144 | Lovell | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080304360 | Mozer | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003133 | Dalton et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090030614 | Carnegie et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090034368 | Johnson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090045974 | Patel | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090080291 | Tubel et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090166031 | Hernandez | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100013663 | Cavender et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100089141 | Rioufol et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100133004 | Burleson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100182161 | Robbins et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212891 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110061862 | Loretz et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066378 | Lerche et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110168403 | Patel | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110188345 | Wang | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110297376 | Holderman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110297673 | Zbat et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301439 | Albert et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110315377 | Rioufol | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120043079 | Wassouf et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120126992 | Rodney et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120152562 | Newton et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179377 | Lie | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20130000981 | Grimmer et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130003503 | L'Her et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130106615 | Prammer | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130138254 | Seals et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130192823 | Barrilleaux et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130278432 | Shashoua et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130319102 | Ringgenberg et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140060840 | Hartshorne et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140062715 | Clark | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140102708 | Purkis et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140133276 | Volker et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140152659 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140153368 | Bar-Cohen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166266 | Read | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140170025 | Weiner et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140266769 | van Zelm | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140327552 | Filas et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140352955 | Tubel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150003202 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150009040 | Bowles et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150027687 | Tubel | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150041124 | Rodriguez | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150041137 | Rodriguez | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150152727 | Fripp et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150159481 | Mebarkia et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150167425 | Hammer et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150176370 | Greening et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150292319 | Disko et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150292320 | Lynk et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150300159 | Stiles et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150330200 | Richard et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150337642 | Spacek | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20150354351 | Morrow et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150377016 | Ahmad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160010446 | Logan et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160047230 | Livescu et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160047233 | Butner et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160076363 | Morrow et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160109606 | Market et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160215612 | Morrow | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20170138185 | Saed et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170145811 | Robison et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170152741 | Park et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170167249 | Lee et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170204719 | Babakhani | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170254183 | Vasques et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170293044 | Gilstrap et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170314386 | Orban et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180010449 | Roberson et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058191 | Romer et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058198 | Ertas et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058202 | Disko et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058203 | Clawson et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058204 | Clawson et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058205 | Clawson et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058206 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058207 | Song et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058208 | Song et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180058209 | Song et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180066490 | Kjos | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180066510 | Walker et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102733799 | Jun 2014 | CN |
| 0636763 | Feb 1995 | EP |
| 1409839 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 2677698 | Dec 2013 | EP |
| WO2002027139 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO2010074766 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO2013079928 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO2014018010 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO2014049360 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO2014100271 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| WO2014134741 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO2015117060 | Aug 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/666,334, filed Aug. 1, 2017, Walker, Katie M. et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/139,373, filed Sep. 24, 2018, Yi, Xiaohua et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/139,384, filed Oct. 13, 2017, Disko, Mark M. et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/139,394, filed Oct. 13, 2017, Song, Limin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/139,403, filed Oct. 13, 2017, Song, Limin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/139,414, filed Oct. 13, 2017, Zhang, Yibing et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/139,421, filed Oct. 13, 2017, Song, Limin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/139,427, filed Oct. 13, 2017, Disko, Mark M. et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/175,418, filed Oct. 30, 2018, Kent, David K. et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/588,067, filed Nov. 17, 2017, Song, Limin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/588,080, filed Nov. 17, 2017, Kinn, Timothy F. et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 62/588,103, filed Nov. 17, 2017, Yi, Xiaohua et al. |
| Arroyo, Javier et al. (2009) “Forecasting Histogram Time Series with K-Nearest Neighbours Methods,” International Journal of Forecasting, v.25, pp. 192-207. |
| Arroyo, Javier et al. (2011) “Smoothing Methods for Histogram-Valued Time Seriers: An Application to Value-at-Risk,” Univ. of California, Dept. of Economics, www.wileyonlinelibrary.com, Mar. 8, 2011, 28 pages. |
| Arroyo, Javier et al. (2011) “Forecasting with Interval and Histogram Data Some Financial Applications,” Univ. of California, Dept. of Economics, 46 pages. |
| Emerson Process Management (2011), “Roxar downhole Wireless PT sensor system,” www.roxar.com, or downhole@roxar.com, 2 pgs. |
| Gonzalez-Rivera, Gloria et al. (2012) “Time Series Modeling of Histogram-Valued Data: The Daily Histogram Time Series of S&P500 Intradaily Returns,” International Journal of Forecasting, v.28, 36 pgs. |
| Gutierrez-Estevez, M. A. et al. (2013) “Acoustic Boardband Communications Over Deep Drill Strings using Adaptive OFDM”, IEEE Wireless Comm. & Networking Conf., pp. 4089-4094. |
| Qu, X. et al. (2011) “Reconstruction fo Self-Sparse 20 NMR Spectra From undersampled Data in the Indirect Dimension”, pp. 8888-8909. |
| U.S. Department of Defense (1999) “Interoperability and Performance Standards for Medium and High Frequency Radio Systems,” MIL-STD-188-141B, Mar. 1, 1999, 584 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190112913 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62572152 | Oct 2017 | US |
