The present invention relates in general to frangible joint separation systems also known to as expanding tube separation, and in particular, to a dual tube frangible joint used to explosively separate two components in a reliable manner.
It is known to utilize linear explosive frangible joints to explosively separate two components, such as that of a missile, satellite or other type of space or air travel vehicle during flight or operation (e.g., to separate two vehicle stages or to separate a payload from a launch vehicle). For example, it is known to utilize a single, elongated, flexible continuous explosive cord that comprises, e.g., a mild detonating fuse (“MDF”) that explodes upon detonation. The explosive cord may be encased in a silicone rubber or other pliable material that is surrounded by a stainless steel tube. This arrangement may be applied to a portion or all of the periphery or circumference of a joint, connection point or location between two components that are desired to be explosively separated at that location at a predetermined time. The explosive cord is typically initiated at one or more ends of the cord and the cord causing the cord to explosively detonate along its length to separate the components.
However, this arrangement may suffer from the drawback that sometimes the single, explosive cord fails to detonate as desired, thereby creating a risk that the two components may not separate as desired, potentially causing loss of vehicle or mission.
It is also known to utilize a dual, redundant explosive cord design that typically comprises two explosive cords, each surrounded by, e.g., a silicone rubber material, and housed together in the same tube without any separation device between the two cords encased within the rubber material. That is, the rubber material surrounding the two explosive cords is contiguous in the space between and around the two explosive cords. In operation, one of the two cords is ignited and explosively detonates, thereby properly separating the two components. In the event that the first ignited cord does not properly explosively detonates and thus fails to separate the two components, the other cord may be ignited in an attempt to explosively detonate the two components.
However, this arrangement can suffer from drawbacks such as cross propagation between the two explosive cords when one of the cords is ignited. Other drawbacks include undesired sympathetic detonation of both explosive cords, secondary fracture of the structure, and duding failure modes.
What is needed is a frangible joint that comprises a dual, redundant explosive cord design including two explosive cords, each disposed in its own tube, that has a first one of the explosive cords detonate to properly explosively separate the two components without inadvertently explosively detonating the second one of the explosive cords, and in the event that the first explosive cord does not properly explosively detonate then a second one of the explosive cords can be explosively detonated to properly separate the two components.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a frangible joint is provided. The frangible joint includes a first portion and a second portion. The first portion and second portion are spaced apart to define a gap. A first explosive cord is arranged within the gap adjacent the first portion. A first pliable member is disposed about the first explosive cord. A first sheath is disposed about the first pliable member. A second explosive cord is arranged within the gap and positioned between the first sheath and the second portion. A second pliable member is disposed about the second explosive cord. A second sheath is disposed about the second pliable member.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a frangible joint for separating a pair of components is provided. The frangible joint includes a first portion coupled one of the pair of components. A second portion is coupled to the other of the pair of components, the first portion and the second portion being spaced apart with a gap therebetween. At least one plate is coupled between the first portion and the second portion across the gap. A first tube has a first explosive cord disposed therein and a first pliable member arranged between the first explosive cord and the first tube, the first tube being disposed in the gap. A second tube has a second explosive cord disposed therein and a second pliable member arranged between the second explosive cord and the second tube, the second tube being disposed in the gap adjacent the first tube.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a method of separating a first component from a second component with a frangible joint is provided. The method includes providing a first tube having a first explosive cord disposed therein and a first pliable member arranged between the first explosive cord and the first tube. A second tube is provided having a second explosive cord disposed therein and a second pliable member arranged between the second explosive cord and the first tube. The first explosive cord is detonated. A predetermined amount of time is waited. The second explosive cord is detonated when the first explosive cord does not explode.
The various embodiments of the present invention can be understood with reference to the following drawings. The components are not necessarily to scale. Also, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
The present invention is more particularly described in the following description and examples that are intended to be illustrative only since numerous modifications and variations therein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form “a,” “an,” and “the” may include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the specification and in the claims, the term “comprising” may include the embodiments “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” Furthermore, all ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints and are independently combinable.
As used herein, approximating language may be applied to modify any quantitative representation that may vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term or terms, such as “about” and “substantially,” may not to be limited to the precise value specified, in some cases. In at least some instances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument for measuring the value.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a frangible joint includes dual tubes, each tube having an explosive cord located therein in a redundant design, the tubes optionally being separated by a spacer, wherein a first one of the explosive cords explosively detonates to properly separate the two components without inadvertently explosively detonating the second one of the explosive cords, and in the event that the first explosive cord does not properly explosively detonate then a second one of the explosive cords is explosively detonated to properly separate the two components.
The foregoing and other features of various disclosed embodiments of the invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description and drawings of the illustrative embodiments of the invention wherein like reference numbers refer to similar elements.
Referring to
The two portions 30, 34 of the frangible joint 10 may, in an embodiment, comprise separate pieces that are connected together by a plurality of, e.g., bolts and nuts 38. One or more separation notches or grooves 42 may be provided along a length of the upper portion 30 of the frangible joint 10. The notches or grooves 42 provide for a relatively weakened section of the upper portion 30 such that when one of the explosive cords 22, 26 is explosively detonated, the upper portion 30 of the frangible joint 10 (as viewed in
Although not shown in
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims. All citations referred herein are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61607129 | Mar 2012 | US |