The present invention relates to a plug for use in a subsea Christmas tree. The invention also relates to a method of intervention in a subsea well, using a plug according to the invention.
When developing subsea oil and gas wells there are stringent demands to the control and containment of the well during all aspects of the work, be it drilling, production or later intervention. The needs for control of well pressure have lead to requirements for safe barriers in the well and/or the Christmas tree, both during production and during intervention work.
In a horizontal type Christmas tree the production tubing hanger is located within the vertical bore of the tree and includes a vertical tubing hanger bore and a horizontal passage which is aligned with the horizontal production outlet in the tree. The production control valves are located in the horizontal outlet. The tubing hanger passage extends above the production outlet to provide access to the well, and this passage must be closed off during production.
In a conventional Christmas tree, the tubing hanger is set in the wellhead and the production control valves are located in the vertical passage of the tree. The control valves function as barriers during normal production, and the tubing hanger includes means for setting a plug in its vertical bore in case the well must be closed down.
In many countries, rules require at least two barriers between the well and the environment. For example, in a horizontal completion the two barriers are set with one in the tubing hanger above the production passage and the other in the tree bore.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,050,339 there is shown a horizontal Christmas tree of a type well known in the art. A first plug is set to close tubing hanger passage above the production outlet. An internal tree cap is set in the vertical bore of the tree above the tubing hanger. The tree cap has an axial bore in which a second plug is set. To gain access to the well, both plugs must be removed.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,336 there is shown another type of a horizontal Christmas tree. As above a first plug is set in the tubing hanger. A tree cap is set in the tree bore above the tubing hanger. A ball valve is located in the tree cap passage. To gain access to the well a tool is run in to open the valve. Thereafter the plug can be removed. This can be done in one operation, thus saving a run.
During the lifetime of the well various types of work may be carried out to enhance production or to measure conditions in the well. To gain access to a living well a pressure containment device, containing a number of valves, must be connected to the well before the barriers can be removed. The pressure containment device ensures control over the well during the work. Depending on the type of the work, either a lubricator stack or a riser is connected to the pressure containment device.
Various parameters dictate the size and complexity of the equipment used during intervention, the main concern being the pressure control valves. One of the principal parameters is well pressure. Higher pressure ratings demand larger equipment. Another parameter is the nominal size of the equipment, related to the tool to be employed during intervention.
In recent years larger type completions have become the norm, with tubing sizes up to 9″. The size of the intervention equipment has therefore also grown bigger, since the internal diameter of the pressure control valves and workover riser must be large enough to accommodate the correspondingly sized plug(s). At the same time, intervention tools have become smaller, down to perhaps 2″ or less. Therefore the size of the plug(s) limits the scaling down of the equipment. This means that smaller equipment cannot be employed even if only small size tools are needed for the work in the well. For example, a standard type completion has a 6″ tubing and therefore a 6″ plug. The equipment must therefore be dimensioned with a nominal 6″ bore even if the tool to be used is only 2″ and could be run in on cable or wireline.
The size and weight of the equipment also influence the choice of the type of vessel used for well intervention, especially governing the load handling capabilities of the vessel. As an example, a complex operation like pulling the tubing requires a full blow out preventer and drilling riser, resulting in the need for using a large drilling rig that can handle this load. At the other end of the scale, a simple sensor can be run in on slickline or cable requiring only a small boat.
Reducing the size of the equipment can therefore reduce costs dramatically. As an example, if the equipment can be reduced to 4″ nominal size, the weight can be reduced by more than 30% as compared with 6″ equipment. This again allows smaller size vessels to be used and cut costs dramatically.
One method to redress this problem is to use smaller size plugs in the tree. However, this solution restricts the choice of intervention methods, and some types of intervention will not be possible or the tubing must be pulled to gain access to the well. Therefore, the preferred choice is to use the full size plugs, to retain the freedom of choice.
According to the invention, this and other problems are solved by designing a retrievable plug, according to the following claim, that contains at least a smaller plug within the main plug. With that, one can choose to pull only the inner plug or the whole plug assembly, as dictated by the need.
The plug according to the invention comprises a main or outer plug which includes a cylindrical housing that is adapted to the bore where the plug is going to be set. The plug further comprises a releasable locking devise for holding the plug in a fixed position relative to the bore, and a number of sealing devises for sealing the plug to the bore. The sealing devises may be a part of the main cylindrical housing or separate elements which are held in position by the plug. The sort of sealing devises necessary will depend on the working environment for the plug, like pressure, temperature, corrosivity etc.
The main cylindrical housing includes at least one bore comprising at least one inner separate retrievable plug. The inner plug is preferably arranged coaxially with the outer main plug. Alternatively it may be arranged asymmetrically in relation with the main plug. There may also be more than one inner separate retrievable plug, for instance two arranged coaxially within each other.
The inner plugs have releasable locking devises and are equipped with sealing devises. These locking and sealing devises may be different or similar to the locking devised for the main plug. It might in some cases be favourable to have the same systems to be able to use the same tool for either retrieving the main plug with the inner plugs or only one of the inner plugs. In other cases may it be favourable due to available space to have different locking and sealing devises in the different plugs, since the main plug has a larger dimension than the inner plugs.
The main plug may comprise locking devises that cooperate with grooves in the bore where it is supposed to be set. This may also be the case for the inner plug by shaping the bore in the main cylindrical housing so that it corresponds with the locking devises for the inner plug.
The plug according to the invention is especially suitable to a part of a Christmas tree for an oil and/or gas well for one or both of the required barriers towards the environment for a well. The plug according to the invention may be set in the tubing hanger and/or in the tree cap as necessary and, while the plug is especially useful for horizontal type trees it can also be used with any conventional trees.
The plug according to the invention may be used anywhere in the well bore where such functionality is desired. For example the plug can be set in the well tubing in deep wells where several tubing strings are employed and where the topmost tubing have a larger diameter.
In the method for intervention in a well with a plug according the invention one may employ the tool adapted to retrieve the plug with the inner plug or only the inner plug through the riser, dependent on the size of the tools which should be used to perform the intervention work. This gives benefits both in need for equipment and risk during intervention work.
The invention will in the following be explained with a preferred embodiment which is one not limiting example of how the invention may be employed, with reference to the drawings.
In
Christmas tree 1 includes a main housing 2 with a central bore 3 and a horizontal production outlet 4. A tubing hanger 5 is locked in bore 3 with tubing 6 extending downwardly therefrom to a production zone in the well. The tubing hanger has a bore 7 axially aligned with the tubing and with the same internal diameter. The tubing hanger includes horizontal passage 8 extending from the bore of the tubing hanger to the outside of the hanger.
When installing the tubing hanger with the tubing in the well, the tubing hanger is oriented in the tree such that its horizontal passage 8 aligns with the tree production outlet 4. Production fluid from the well is conveyed through tubing 6 and outlet 4 and to a manifold in the known manner.
After completion of the well, the part of bore 7 located above passage 8 is closed off with a plug 10. The plug is retrievably set using a suitable tool (not shown) with the help of latching dogs designed to interface with a groove in the wall of bore 7, as will be explained in more detail later.
An internal tree cap 20 is set in the tree bore 3 above the tubing hanger. The tree cap has an internal bore 21 in which is located a ball valve 22. The ball valve is normally closed but can be opened using a suitable tool (not shown).
Alternatively, a second plug can be set in tree cap bore 21, for example as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,050,339.
Inner cylindrical housing 33 has an inner surface with a lower part machined to form a seal surface 44, an upward facing shoulder 45 and a ring groove 46.
A locking sleeve 35 is mounted for axial movement in the plug in the annular space between the outer 31 and inner 33 cylindrical housings. A downward facing shoulder 34 on the sleeve engages with shoulder 32 to act as a stop. Shoulder 34 divides locking sleeve 35 into a lower part 39, middle part 40 with a greater outer diameter and upper part 41. Upper part has an inward facing flange 36. Also, in the outer surface of the upper part 41, a radial groove is machined out and a ring 38 is located in the groove. The ring 38 protrudes outwards from locking sleeve to slide in slot 37. This, together with shoulder 34 acts as a limit for upward and downward movement of locking sleeve 35.
Alternatively, the slot 37 may be a number of radially displaced axial grooves and ring 38 a number of protruding pins. This will prevent the locking sleeve from rotating but allows axial movement between the lower position shown in
When locking sleeve 35 is in its lower position as shown in
An inner plug 50 is shown positioned co-axially within main plug 30. Inner plug 50 is cup-shaped, with cylindrical part 51 and bottom 52. Inner plug 50 forms a sliding fit within main plug 30. Cylindrical part 51 has an outer wall with a downward facing shoulder 57 and a number of regularly spaced radial openings in which corresponding locking dogs 53 are positioned. The inner wall of cylindrical part 51 has an upward facing shoulder 55. At its upper end a slot 56 of the same construction as slot 37 is machined. At the lower end of the inner plug 50 are located seals 62 to seal against the surface 44 of main plug 30. The seals 62 are held in place on the cylindrical part 51 by an annular seal retainer 63. Locking dogs 53 are held in a normally retracted position but can be made to extend radially to interface with groove 46 in inner wall of plug 30. A rocking sleeve 54 is mounted within cylindrical part 51. Locking sleeve has a downward facing shoulder 60 that abuts against shoulder 55. At its upper end locking sleeve 54 has an inward facing flange 58 and a circumference groove in which a ring 59 is mounted. The ring 59 slides in slot 56 to limit the axial movement of the locking sleeve 54. The locking sleeve 54 is thus movable between a lower position (as shown in
Inner plug 50 can be equipped with means for engaging a fishing tool, for example profiles 64 as shown in
Where there are two plugs in the tree, the upper plug in the tree cap can be designed so that its inner plug is slightly larger than inner plug 50. After removing inner plug in the upper plug, the inner plug of the lower plug can then be removed through the upper plug without the need for removing the whole upper plug.
In
Three types of vessels are shown, a full drilling or intervention rig 70, an intermediate boat-type vessel 71 and a relatively small boat 72. The rig 70 is used for heavy intervention type work, having full facilities for all types of intervention work, and would include a tower hoist system, heave compensation system, storage space for risers, drillpipe and blowout preventers (BOP), and so on. The intermediate vessel 71 may also be equipped with tower hoist systems capable of running drillpipe, but will normally be used for coil tubing operations and smaller workover risers or wireline work, and does not have the large handling capacity of the rig. This type of vessels is normally held in position with dynamic positioning (DP) systems. The small vessel 72 has limited handling capacity and is therefore restricted in the type of work and in what weather conditions it can be used and will normally only be used to run equipment on wireline, cable or slickline. This type of vessel is only equipped with cranes.
Three types of intervention are also illustrated. The equipment shown can be connected to a Christmas tree that can either be a conventional 73 or horizontal 74 Christmas tree. Different designs are taken care of by using adapters between the XT and workover equipment.
One type of intervention requires a BOP 75 running on riser 76. The riser can be either 20″ or 14″ as necessary. The tools are normally run in by drillpipe. Since both BOP and risers are very heavy equipment, a heavy rig is normally employed. The second type of intervention uses a pressure control device commonly called a Lower Riser Package (LRP) 77. Between a workover riser 79 and the LRP 77 is located an Emergency Disconnect Package (EDP) 78. Well tools are normally run in with coil tubing or wireline. There are several sizes of this type of equipment, dictated by the size of the tubing and the type of work. In the third type the pressure control device is commonly called a Lower Intervention package (LIP) 80 to which is attached a lubricator 81. Well tools are run in on cable or wireline and the lubricator is used to gain control access to the well.
As the weight of the equipment increases, the vessel must be able to handle the loads. Especially critical is the passage of the equipment during the splash zone, but limitations are also imposed on the vessels capability of handling the equipment in heavy seas.
This invention is specially suited to work requiring a workover riser. Several types exist, with nominal sizes 7″, 6″ or 5″. As previously indicated, the nominal size dictates the size of the other equipment, e.g. the pressure control valves in the LRP. A reduction in size from 6″ to 5″ riser may result in a weight saving of more than 30%. It is therefore important to choose the right size of the equipment for the work to be done, since this increases the number and choice of vessels capable of handling the work.
To gain access to the well, the pressure control assembly (LRP) is first connected to the Christmas tree. Then the workover riser and EDP are connected to the LRP. A second pressure control assembly (surface BOP) is attached to the top of the workover riser. A tool is run in to remove the entire plug 10 to open the well. If only smaller tools are scheduled to be used during intervention, a smaller LRP and workover riser can be used. A tool is run in to engage with flange 58 to pull the inner plug 50 from the main plug 30.
The method of the invention therefore allows for a wider choice of both equipment and vessels and allows the equipment to be more specifically tailored to the work. When work is planned in a well, it will first be analysed what type of work is necessary. If only small tools are to be used, the choice of workover equipment will be chosen accordingly and a suitable vessel commissioned. After connecting the equipment to the well, a tool is run in to release and retrieve the plug. If the job is light, only the inner plug will be retrieved through the smallbore riser. The work in the well is completed and the equipment disconnected from the well. If it is desired to use larger tools, again a suitable size of workover riser and vessel is chosen. After connecting to the well, a tool is run in, this time to retrieve the main plug, allowing larger tools to be run into the well.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20032330 | May 2003 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2004/000151 | 5/19/2004 | WO | 00 | 10/10/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/104364 | 12/2/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2808229 | Bauer et al. | Oct 1957 | A |
3242991 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3252515 | Donaldson et al. | May 1966 | A |
3256937 | Haeber et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3554281 | Ecuer | Jan 1971 | A |
3556212 | Vazquez et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3580332 | Dean et al. | May 1971 | A |
4047566 | Duke | Sep 1977 | A |
4164980 | Duke | Aug 1979 | A |
4412559 | Streich et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4522259 | Akkerman | Jun 1985 | A |
4651818 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
5020597 | Braddick et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5240081 | Milberger et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5542475 | Turner et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566772 | Coone et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575336 | Morgan | Nov 1996 | A |
5787979 | Giroux et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5868204 | Pritchett et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884706 | Edwards | Mar 1999 | A |
5954134 | Longbottom | Sep 1999 | A |
5988277 | Vick et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988282 | Jennings et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996697 | Vick et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6050339 | Milberger | Apr 2000 | A |
6076605 | Lilley et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6109353 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6352114 | Toalson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367551 | Fenton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408947 | Cunningham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6547008 | Hopper et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547009 | Vick, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6719059 | Dezen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6810954 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7025132 | Kent et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7069988 | Bartlett et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7128157 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143830 | Bartlett | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20030019632 | Humphrey et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030111228 | Garrett et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20070289745 | Richards | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 350 918 | Oct 2003 | EP |
2 192 921 | Jan 1988 | GB |
2 361 726 | Oct 2001 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070074870 A1 | Apr 2007 | US |