Prior to a detailed discussion of the figures, a general overview of the system will be presented. For purposes of this disclosure, the term “pick” will be used to refer to any device used by an unauthorized person to attempt to release the anti-theft tag from its securing member.
This invention provides new embodiments that are improvements over the prior art. In particular, the invention provides reusable anti-theft tags that reduce cost, are more convenient for the consumer, and are better for the environment. Further, the same anti-theft tag body can be used as a reusable anti-theft tag, or as a single use recyclable tag. Changing the anti-theft tag from a reusable configuration to a single use configuration is accomplished by adding a straight spring lock to prevent the anti-theft tag from returning to the locked position once opened. As a result, substantial manufacturing savings are achieved by allowing the same anti-theft tag to be used for either reusable anti-theft tags or single use recyclable anti-theft tags.
In a preferred embodiment, the invention uses a conventional ball bearing lock which is commercially available and well known in the art. When the anti-theft tag is secured to merchandise via a securing pin, the ball bearing lock prevents the securing pin from being detached. Securing pins are commercially available and are also well known in the art. In a preferred embodiment, a pivoting plate is arranged above the ball bearing lock. When the pivoting plate is tilted by a mechanical probe during the unlocking process, the pivoting plate presses down on the ball bearing lock and releases the securing pin. Once the mechanical probe is withdrawn, the ball bearing lock returns to its locked position. Alternatively, the ball bearing lock can be released magnetically by applying a strong magnetic field to it. Magnetic release mechanisms are also commercially available and are also well known in the art. Once the magnetic field is removed, the ball bearing lock returns to the locked position.
The same anti-theft tag structure used by the preferred embodiment (i.e., the reusable anti-theft tag) can also be used for an alternative preferred embodiment that is a single use recyclable anti-theft tag. The recyclable anti-theft tag is identical to the reusable tag in except that it adds an optional retaining spring that engages a slot on the side of the securing pin channel when the anti-theft tag is unlocked. Once engaged, the anti-theft tag remains in the unlocked position. The merchant then sends the recyclable tags back to the tag manufacturer where it is reset and sent to a product manufacturer where it is reattached to a new product and sent to a retailer. This process eliminates the need for the retailer to do anything insofar as attaching anti-theft tags to products is concerned. This results in savings of time and expense for the retailer. In addition, this process also is environmentally friendly in that it reuses the anti-theft tag rather than discarding it each time a retailer makes a sale. The use of the same anti-theft tag structure for both the reusable and recyclable anti-theft tags also reduces manufacturing costs by using the same design.
Having discussed the features and advantages of the invention in general, we now turn to a detailed discussion of the figures.
In use, the anti-theft tag can be opened by either of two methods. First, when magnetically opened, the ball bearing lock 2 is moved to the release position by the magnetic field. Second, if the anti-theft tag 1 is mechanically released by a conventional detacher arm (not shown), the detacher arm enters the anti-theft tag 1 at opening 5. The detacher arm presses against pressure plate 11, which in turn moves the lock lever 8 against the ball bearing lock 2. When this happens, the ball bearing lock 2 moves to the release position. In either case, the securing pin can be removed and the anti-theft tag 1 is detached from the merchandise.
If the anti-theft tag 1 is the reusable embodiment, the securing pin is removed and the anti-theft tag 1 is then removed from the merchandise. The anti-theft tag 1 is then available for reuse. Alternatively, if the anti-theft tag 1 is the recyclable embodiment, when it is released, it is locked in the release position by locking spring 14. In this embodiment, the anti-theft tag 1 is then returned to the tag manufacturer for attachment to new merchandise. These embodiments envision the anti-theft tag 1 being manufactured by an anti-theft tag 1 manufacturer who ships the anti-theft tags 1 to a merchandise manufacturer. The merchandise manufacturer then attaches the anti-theft tags 1 to merchandise which is then shipped to a retailer. When the retailer makes a sale, the anti-theft tag 1 is detached and returned to the anti-theft tag 1 manufacturer. This provides a significant benefit to the retailer because they obtain merchandise with the anti-theft tags 1 pre-attached, thereby minimizing any retailer cost associated with the attachment and use of the anti-theft tags 1. In addition, these embodiments provide a significant benefit in that, by recycling the anti-theft tags 1, they eliminate the environmental costs associated with disposable tags.
As can be seen from the foregoing, the anti-theft tag 1 structure set forth herein provides the retailer with low-cost method of providing anti-theft protection by shifting the cost of attaching the anti-theft tags 1 to the merchandise manufacturer. It further is environmentally friendly in that it reuses anti-theft tags 1 rather than discarding them after each sale. The design also provides an anti-theft tag 1 that can be used with both a mechanical and/or a magnetic detacher device. As a result, retailers can use the new anti-theft tags 1 without replacing their detacher devices. The embodiments provided herein disclose a reusable anti-theft tag that can be reattached to merchandise, or alternatively, a recyclable anti-theft tag that is reset by the anti-theft tag manufacturer. As a result, the retailer needs only to remove the recyclable anti-theft tags from the merchandise, and ship them in bulk to the anti-theft tag manufacturer for subsequent reuse.
While the invention has been described with respect to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit, scope, and teaching of the invention. For example, the material used to construct the components of the anti-theft tag may be anything suitable for their purpose, the size and shape of the anti-theft tag can vary, etc. The spring lock can vary. Accordingly, the invention herein disclosed is to be limited only as specified in the following claims.
This application is related to, and claims the benefit of, the provisional patent application entitled “Dual Use Anti-Theft Tag”, filed Apr. 29, 2006, bearing U.S. Ser. No. 60/795,741 and naming Stuart T. Seidel, the named inventor herein, as sole inventor, the contents of which is specifically incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60795741 | Apr 2006 | US |