Most modern engines are direct injection engines, such that each combustion cylinder of the engine includes a dedicated fuel injector configured to inject fuel directly into a combustion chamber. While direct injection engines represent an improvement in engine technology over past designs (e.g., carburetors) with regard to increased engine efficiency and reduced emissions, direct injection engines can produce relatively high levels of certain undesired emissions.
Engine emissions can include soot, which results from combustion of a fuel-rich and oxygen-lean fuel mixture. Soot comprises small carbon particles created by the fuel-rich regions of diffusion flames commonly created in a combustion chamber of an engine, which may be operating at medium to high load. Soot is an environmental hazard, an emission regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States of America, and the second most important climate-forcing species (carbon dioxide being the most important). Currently, soot is removed from the exhaust of diesel engines by large and expensive particulate filters in the exhaust system. Other post-combustion treatments may also have to be utilized, such as NOx selective catalytic reduction, a NOx trap, oxidation catalyst, etc. These after-treatment systems have to be maintained to enable continued and effective reduction of soot/particulates and other undesired emissions, and accordingly add further cost to a combustion system both in terms of initial equipment cost and subsequent maintenance.
A focus of combustion technologies is burning fuel in leaner mixtures, because such mixtures tend to produce less soot, NOx, and potentially other regulated emissions such as hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO). One such combustion strategy is Leaner Lifted-Flame Combustion (LLFC). LLFC is a combustion strategy that does not produce soot because combustion occurs at equivalence ratios less than or equal to approximately two. The equivalence ratio is the actual ratio of fuel to oxidizer divided by the stoichiometric ratio of fuel to oxidizer. LLFC can be achieved by enhanced local mixing of fuel with the charge-gas (i.e., air with or without additional gas-phase compounds) in the combustion chamber.
The following is a brief summary of subject matter that is described in greater detail herein. This summary is not intended to be limiting as to the scope of the claims.
Described herein are various technologies designed to enhance local mixing rates inside a combustion chamber, relative to mixing produced in a conventional combustion chamber configuration/arrangement. The enhanced mixing rates are used to form one or more locally premixed mixtures comprising fuel and charge-gas, featuring lower peak fuel to charge-gas ratios, with the objective of enabling minimal, or zero, generation of soot in the combustion chamber during ignition and subsequent combustion of the locally premixed mixtures. To enable mixing of the fuel and the charge-gas to produce a locally premixed mixture with a lower peak fuel to charge-gas ratio, a jet of fuel can be directed such that it passes through a bore of a duct (e.g., down a tube, a hollow cylindroid), with passage of the fuel causing charge-gas to be drawn into the bore such that turbulence is created within the bore to cause enhanced mixing of the fuel and the drawn charge-gas. A charge-gas inside the combustion chamber can comprise of air with or without additional gas-phase compounds.
Combustion of the locally premixed mixture(s) can occur within a combustion chamber, wherein the fuel can be any suitable flammable or combustible liquid or vapor. For example, the combustion chamber can be formed as a function of various surfaces comprising a wall of a cylinder bore (e.g., formed in an engine block), a flame deck surface of a cylinder head, and a piston crown of a piston that reciprocates within the cylinder bore. A fuel injector can be mounted in the cylinder head, wherein fuel is injected into the combustion chamber via at least one opening in a tip of the fuel injector. For each opening in the fuel injector tip, a duct can be aligned therewith to enable fuel injected by the fuel injector to pass through the bore of the duct. Charge-gas is drawn into the bore of the duct as a result of the low pressures locally created by the high velocity jet of fuel flowing through the bore. This charge-gas mixes rapidly with the fuel due to intense turbulence created by the large velocity gradients between the duct wall and the centerline of the fuel jet, resulting in the formation of a locally premixed mixture with a lower peak fuel to charge-gas ratio exiting the duct to undergo subsequent ignition and combustion in the combustion chamber.
In an embodiment, the duct can have a number of holes or slots formed along its length to further enable charge-gas to be drawn into the bore of the duct during passage of the fuel along the bore.
In another embodiment, the duct can be formed from a tube, wherein the walls of the tube are parallel to each other (e.g., a hollow cylinder), hence a diameter of the bore at the first end of the duct (e.g., an inlet) is the same as the diameter of the bore at the second end of the duct (e.g., an outlet). In another embodiment, the walls of the tube can be non-parallel such that the diameter of the bore at the first end of the duct is different from the diameter of the bore at the second end of the duct.
The duct(s) can be formed from any material suitable for application in a combustion chamber, e.g., a metallic-containing material (e.g., steel, INCONEL, HASTELLOY, . . . ), a ceramic-containing material, etc.
In a further embodiment, the duct(s) can be attached to the fuel injector prior to insertion of the fuel injector into the combustion chamber, with an assembly comprising the fuel injector and the duct(s) being located to form a portion of the combustion chamber. In another embodiment, the fuel injector can be located in the combustion chamber and the duct(s) subsequently attached to the fuel injector.
During operation of the engine, a temperature inside the bore of the duct may be less than an ambient temperature inside the combustion chamber such that the ignition delay of the mixture is increased, and mixing of the fuel and charge-gas prior to autoignition is further improved compared with direct injection of the fuel into the combustion chamber.
The above summary presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the systems and/or methods discussed herein. This summary is not an extensive overview of the systems and/or methods discussed herein. It is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope of such systems and/or methods. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
Various technologies are presented herein pertaining to utilizing one or more ducts to create locally premixed fuel and charge-gas mixtures with lower peak fuel to charge-gas ratios prior to combustion, with a primary objective being to minimize and/or preclude the generation of soot (or other undesired particulates/emissions). Like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements of the technologies throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of one or more aspects. It may be evident, however, that such aspect(s) may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to facilitate describing one or more aspects.
Further, the term “or” is intended to mean an inclusive “or” rather than an exclusive “or”. That is, unless specified otherwise, or clear from the context, the phrase “X employs A or B” is intended to mean any of the natural inclusive permutations. That is, the phrase “X employs A or B” is satisfied by any of the following instances: X employs A; X employs B; or X employs both A and B. In addition, the articles “a” and “an” as used in this application and the appended claims should generally be construed to mean “one or more” unless specified otherwise or clear from the context to be directed to a singular form. Additionally, as used herein, the term “exemplary” is intended to mean serving as an illustration or example of something, and is not intended to indicate a preference.
Further, the combustion chamber 105 has located therein one or more ducts 150 which can be utilized to direct fuel injected in the combustion chamber 105 via an opening 146 of the injector 140 (as further described below). Per conventional operation of a combustion engine, an inlet valve(s) 160 is utilized to enable inlet of charge-gas into the combustion chamber 105, and an exhaust valve(s) 165 to enable exhausting of any combustion products (e.g., gases, soot, etc.) formed in the combustion chamber 105 as a function of a combustion process occurring therein. A charge-gas inside the combustion chamber 105 can comprise of air with or without additional gas-phase compounds.
Turning to
As previously mentioned, in a situation where a fuel-rich mixture of fuel and charge-gas undergoes combustion, soot can be generated, which is undesirable. Hence, it is desired to have a fuel/charge-gas mixture having equivalence ratios less than or equal to approximately two. As the respective jet(s) of fuel 185 travels through the bore 153 of the respective duct 150, a pressure differential is generated inside of the duct 150 such that charge-gas in the combustion chamber 105 is also drawn into the duct 150. The charge-gas mixes rapidly with the fuel 185 due to intense turbulence created by the high velocity gradients between the duct bore 153 (at which the fluid velocity is zero) and the centerline of the fuel jet 185 (at which the fluid velocity is large). The turbulent conditions can enhance the rate of mixing between the jet of fuel 185 and the drawn charge-gas, wherein the degree of mixing of the fuel 185 and charge-gas in the bore 153 can be greater than a degree of mixing that would occur in a conventional configuration wherein the jet of fuel 185 was simply injected into the charge-gas filled combustion chamber 105 without passage through a duct. For the conventional configuration, the jet of fuel 185 would undergo a lesser amount of turbulent mixing with the charge-gas than is enabled by passing the jet of fuel 185 through the duct 150, per the configuration 100.
Per
In an embodiment, the diameter D2 of the bore 153 of the duct 150 can be greater than the diameter D3 of the respective opening 146 to which the first end 157 of the duct 150 is proximate. For example D2 can be about 5 times larger than D3, D2 can be about 50 times larger than D3, D2 can have a diameter that is any magnitude greater than D3, e.g., a magnitude selected in the range of about 5 times larger than D3 through to a value of 50 times larger than D3, etc.
As shown in
While
Further, as shown in
Per the various embodiments herein, a plurality of ducts can be located proximate to the injector tip 145, whereby the plurality of ducts can be attached to the injector tip 145, and the injector tip 145 and duct(s) assembly can be positioned in the cylinder head 125/flame deck surface 120 to form the combustion chamber. For example, per configuration 700 illustrated in
In another embodiment, the injector tip can already be located at the flame deck and the duct(s) can be subsequently attached to the injector tip. As shown in
It is to be appreciated that the number of ducts 150 to be arranged around an injector tip 145 can be of any desired number, N (e.g., in accord with a number of openings 146 in a tip 145), where N is a positive integer. Hence, while
In an aspect, to maximize mixing of fuel and charge-gas in a duct bore it may be beneficial to have the direction of emission of the fuel from an opening in a fuel injector to be accurately co-aligned with the centerline of the bore. To achieve such accurate co-alignment, a bore can be utilized to aid formation of an opening. Such an approach is shown in
With the duct 150 positioned as desired, an opening 146 can be formed at the tip 145. In an embodiment, the opening 146 can be formed by electrical discharge machining (EDM), however, it is to be appreciated that any suitable fabrication technology can be utilized to form the opening 146. As shown, the duct 150 can be utilized to enable the EDM operation to be performed at desired angle, e.g., the duct 150 can be utilized to guide a tool piece (e.g., an EDM electrode) at an angle to enable formation of the opening 146 having an alignment to enable the jet of fuel to flow in the direction of the centerline of travel, ℄. It is to be appreciated that while
The duct(s) 150 can be formed from any material suitable for application in a combustion chamber, e.g., a metallic-containing material such as steel, INCONEL, HASTELLOY, etc., a ceramic-containing material, etc.
It is to be appreciated that the various embodiments presented herein are applicable to any type of fuel and an oxidizer (e.g., oxygen), where such fuels can include diesel, jet fuel, gasoline, crude or refined petroleum, petroleum distillates, hydrocarbons (e.g., normal, branched, or cyclic alkanes, aromatics), oxygenates (e.g., alcohols, esters, ethers, ketones), compressed natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, biofuel, biodiesel, bioethanol, synthetic fuel, hydrogen, ammonia, etc., or mixtures thereof.
Further, the various embodiments presented herein have been described with reference to a compression-ignition engine (e.g., a diesel engine), however, the embodiments are applicable to any combustion technology such as a direct injection engine, other compression-ignition engines, a spark ignition engine, a gas turbine engine, an industrial boiler, any combustion driven system, etc.
Furthermore, as well as reducing the generation of soot, the various embodiments presented herein can also lower the emissions of other undesired combustion products. For example, production of nitric oxide (NO) and/or other compounds comprising nitrogen and oxygen can be lowered by utilizing a sufficiently fuel-lean mixture (e.g., at region 187 of jet 185). Also, unburned hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions can be lowered if the correct mixture is created at the exit of the bore of a duct (e.g., bore 153 of duct 150) during combustion.
At 1020, fuel can be injected by the fuel injector, with the fuel passing through the orifice and into the bore of the duct. Passage of the fuel through the duct causes the fuel to mix with charge-gas drawn into the bore to enable the level of mixing to form the desired locally premixed mixture with a lower peak fuel to charge-gas ratio.
At 1030, the locally premixed mixture with a lower peak fuel to charge-gas ratio exiting the duct can undergo ignition as a function of operation of the combustion engine. Ignition of the locally premixed mixture results in negligible or no soot being formed, as compared with the larger quantities of undesirable emissions being formed from combustion of a “too-rich” mixture utilized in a conventional combustion engine or device.
At 1120, the assembly comprising the fuel injector, sleeve, and at least one duct can be placed in an opening in the cylinder head to enable the tip of the fuel injector and the at least one duct to be positioned, as desired, in relation to a plane P-P of a flame deck surface of a cylinder head, which further forms a portion of a combustion chamber.
At 1220, at least one duct can be attached to, or proximate to, the tip of the fuel injector such that the at least one duct can be located and/or aligned with respect to a direction of travel of fuel injected from each opening in the tip of the fuel injector with respect to each aligned duct.
At 1320, an opening can be formed in the tip of the fuel injector. As previously described, the duct can be utilized to guide formation of the opening. For example, if the opening is to be formed by EDM, the bore of the duct can be utilized to guide an EDM electrode to a point on the tip of the fuel injector at which the opening is to be formed. Formation of the opening can subsequently occur per standard EDM procedure(s). Accordingly, the opening is formed at a desired location, e.g., centrally placed relative to the center of a circle forming a profile of the bore of the duct. Also, the walls of the opening can be aligned, e.g., parallel to the centerline ℄, to enable the jet of fuel being injected along the bore of the duct to be located centrally within the bore to maximize mixing between the fuel and the charge-gas drawn in from the combustion chamber.
Experiments were conducted relating to measurement of soot incandescence, which is indicative of whether LLFC was achieved when ducts were employed to inject fuel into a combustion chamber. In the experiments, LLFC was achieved, e.g., chemical reactions that did not form soot were sustained throughout the combustion event. OH* chemiluminescence was utilized to measure a lift-off length of a flame (e.g., axial distance between a fuel injector opening (orifice) and an autoignition zone). OH* is created when high-temperature chemical reactions are occurring inside an engine, and its most upstream location indicates the axial distance from the injector to where the fuel starts to burn, e.g., the lift-off length.
Conditions during the experiments are presented in Table 1.
A baseline freely propagating jet (“free-jet”) flame exhibiting high soot incandescence signal saturation was observed, indicating that a significant amount of soot was produced without a duct in position. Next, the combustion of ducted jets was studied. A plurality of duct diameters and duct lengths were tested, including duct inside diameters of about 3 mm, about 5 mm, and about 7 mm, and duct lengths of about 7 mm, about 14 mm, and about 21 mm.
Such a ducted jet experiment was subsequently conducted, using identical imaging conditions and similar operating conditions as those referenced above for the free jet, where a 3 mm inside diameter×14 mm long untapered steel duct was positioned about 2 mm downstream (e.g., gap G=about 2 mm) from the injector. The soot incandescence signal exhibited almost no saturation, which indicates that minimal, if any, soot was produced. The post-duct flame did not spread out as wide as the free-jet flame in the baseline experiment, as it moved axially across the combustion chamber. The combustion flame centered about the centerline, ℄, resulted from a combination of the mixing caused by the duct (as previously described), and further as a function of heat transfer to the duct. The duct was operating at a temperature lower than the ambient conditions in the combustion chamber (e.g., 950 K), and accordingly, the duct allowed the injected fuel to travel in a lower temperature environment (e.g., within the bore of the duct) than would be experienced in a free jet flame.
A degree of turbulence generated during flow of the fuel through the duct was computed by determining a Reynolds number (Re) for conditions within the bore of the duct. Per Eqn. 1:
where ρ is the ambient density, V is velocity, L is the duct diameter, and μ is the dynamic viscosity. The velocity V was calculated per Eqn. 2:
where pinj is the fuel-injection pressure, pamb is the ambient pressure, and ρf is the density of the fuel. Application of the operating conditions to Eqns. 1 and 2, generated Reynolds numbers of at least 1×104, indicating that turbulent conditions exist within the duct.
As previously mentioned, turbulent flow of a jet of fuel 185 through a duct 150 causes the jet of fuel 185 to mix with charge-gas that was drawn in from the outside of the duct 150 (e.g., through a gap G, and/or holes H1-Hn), e.g., as a result of low local pressures in the vicinity of the duct entrance that are established by the high velocity of the injected jet of fuel 185. The turbulent mixing rate established within the duct 150 can be considered to be a function of the velocity gradients within the duct, which will be roughly proportional to the centerline fluid velocity at a given axial position divided by the duct diameter at the given axial position.
What has been described above includes examples of one or more embodiments. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable modification and alteration of the above structures or methodologies for purposes of describing the aforementioned aspects, but one of ordinary skill in the art can recognize that many further modifications and permutations of various aspects are possible. Accordingly, the described aspects are intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/058,613, filed on Oct. 1, 2014, entitled “DUCTED FUEL INJECTION”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was developed under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 between Sandia Corporation and the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1260408 | Leissner | Mar 1918 | A |
2223590 | Alden | Dec 1940 | A |
2295081 | Harvath | Sep 1942 | A |
2583726 | Chalom | Jan 1952 | A |
3035780 | Peras | May 1962 | A |
3425399 | Ward et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3644076 | Bagge | Feb 1972 | A |
3787168 | Koppang et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3844707 | Wormser | Oct 1974 | A |
4020801 | Jarnuszkiewicz | May 1977 | A |
4067496 | Martin | Jan 1978 | A |
4245589 | Ryan | Jan 1981 | A |
4480613 | Siewert | Nov 1984 | A |
4548172 | Bailey | Oct 1985 | A |
4974559 | Nagaoka | Dec 1990 | A |
5235805 | Barbier et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5294056 | Buchholz | Mar 1994 | A |
5388985 | Musil et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5498153 | Jones | Mar 1996 | A |
5573396 | Swanson | Nov 1996 | A |
7051956 | Upatnieks | May 2006 | B2 |
7402039 | McElroy | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7661401 | Anezaki et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8142169 | Whaling et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8864491 | Pfefferie et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8967129 | Mueller | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020041836 | Komai et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20040211389 | Delisle | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20080011887 | Parish | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080201063 | Reuss et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090020633 | Limmer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090050717 | Takase | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090255998 | Das | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110067671 | Laimboeck | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120186555 | Mueller | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140075949 | Prociw | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20160298531 | Anders et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160298583 | Anders et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
894338 | Oct 1953 | DE |
2880915 | Jul 2006 | FR |
1976042311 | Mar 1976 | JP |
3286124 | Dec 1991 | JP |
5086864 | Apr 1993 | JP |
5272338 | Oct 1993 | JP |
5296045 | Nov 1993 | JP |
2002276373 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004308449 | Nov 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160097360 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62058613 | Oct 2014 | US |