The present invention generally relates to security devices that are resistant to chemical attack and mechanical degradation and to security articles having at least one such security device partially or fully embedded therein and/or mounted thereon.
It is known that secure documents or instruments may be rendered less susceptible to forgery or counterfeiting by including security features in various forms within the body of the document. In fact, the security or integrity of a document or instrument will increase with the number of separate and distinct security features that it employs.
Many security papers and other items of value include a security device or element, such as a security thread, disposed on or within the document. The security device typically includes one or more security features, such as metallic, magnetic and/or luminescent security features that serve to authenticate the security paper and prevent or deter counterfeiting.
A common type of security thread includes metal-formed characters or indicia disposed on a plastic carrier substrate. Such threads, which are coated with a very thin (e.g., 300 to 500 angstrom) layer of metal, such as aluminum, and are then demetallized, display either: discrete metal characters as currently used in United States currency; negative or reverse-image characters as currently used in the new Euro currency; or a repeating pattern of isolated metal blocks containing negative or reverse-image characters as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,486,022 and as used in Indian and Venezuelan currencies. These threads are visually detectable in transmitted light by members of the public and may be machine detectable by conventional thread detectors that detect the presence or absence of conductive features on the threads. The repeating patterns of the threads described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,486,022 and employed in Indian and Venezuelan currencies are machine readable as well as machine detectable.
Demetallized threads have well known advantages over printed security threads. Due to the presence of a reflective metal layer, beneficial optical effects are produced under circumstances where the thread is entirely buried in paper as well as when partially exposed as in the case of windowed thread. There are further advantages to the metallic layer when security threads are authenticated during banknote sorting. The presence of either a continuous metal layer or a specifically encoded patterned metal layer can be detected on the basis of conductivity.
A known disadvantage of demetallized threads is their susceptibility to corrosive effects during paper manufacturing and in circulating banknotes. More specifically, any metal extending to the edge of the thread, even when protected by a laminate or transparent coating, acts as a wick for chemicals that cause corrosion or degradation of the metal layer. As a consequence threads in banknotes exposed to even weak alkali solutions such as used in common household laundries may lose all or part of their metal layer via corrosion from the edges inward.
A need therefore exists for a security device that is resistant to chemical attack.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide such a durable security device.
It is a more particular object to provide a security device for use in security articles such as bank notes and the like, that matches or exceeds the durability of the security article.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a security article having at least one durable security device at least partially embedded therein and/or mounted thereon.
The present invention therefore provides a security device comprising:
wherein, the protective layer(s) is adhered to at least the opposing longitudinal borders of the support layer surface.
The present invention further provides a security article having at least one security device, as defined hereinabove, at least partially embedded therein and/or mounted thereon.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to one of ordinary skill from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
Particular features of the disclosed invention are illustrated by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The present invention serves to address the problem of providing a durable security device, one that is resistant to chemical attack and mechanical degradation. The solution to this problem resides in the discovery that sealing the support and protective layers along opposing longitudinal borders adjacent to the information-bearing layer will prevent corrosive and/or degrading materials from reaching the information-bearing layer through these sealed borders. As a result, the information conveyed by way of the information-bearing layer and thus the integrity of the security device is preserved.
In a preferred embodiment, at least a portion of the information-bearing layer is fully encapsulated by the support and protective layers, rendering this portion or layer and the information conveyed thereby, impervious to chemical attack.
The inventive security device will be described herein below mainly as a security thread used in association with banknotes. The invention, however, is not so limited. The durable security device of the present invention can be utilized in a variety of different forms (e.g., patches, stripes) with any document or means of identification for authentication purposes.
The support layer of the durable security device is a light-transmitting support layer that has a thickness ranging from about 8 to about 26 microns (preferably from about 10 to about 15 microns).
In a preferred embodiment, the support layer is formed using one or more essentially colorless polymers selected from the group of polyester, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and mixtures thereof. In a more preferred embodiment, the support layer is a polyester film.
In another preferred embodiment, the support layer is colored and/or luminescent and, in yet another preferred embodiment, the support layer provides adhesive properties to bond the security device into or onto paper.
The information-bearing layer(s) is either a continuous or discontinuous strip that is formed along the entire length of the support layer surface. The thickness of the information-bearing layer(s) ranges from about 0.001 to about 0.01 microns.
The information conveyed by the information-bearing layer(s) may be visually perceivable information (e.g., letters, numbers, symbols) and/or machine-detectable and optionally machine-readable information (e.g., a plurality of metal regions).
In a preferred embodiment, the information-bearing layer(s) is an opaque strip formed using materials selected from the group of aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), gold (Au), iron (Fe), nickel (Ni), silver (Ag), alloys of two or more of the aforementioned materials, and alloys that produce an opaque layer upon sputtering, vacuum deposition, plasma coating and the like. In a more preferred embodiment, the information-bearing layer(s) is formed using aluminum. In another more preferred embodiment, the information-bearing layer(s) is formed using a magnetic metal such as nickel or a nickel/cobalt alloy.
Several embodiments of the information-bearing layer(s) are shown in
In a first embodiment, and as best shown in
In a second embodiment, and as best shown in
The cross thread stops 20a, 20b require a dimension no greater than 0.1 millimeters (mm) in width and, as best shown in
The embodiments shown in
The breaks or cross thread stops 20 shown in
As alluded to above, information-bearing layer 14 may also take the form of a multi-layer structure or laminate. In one such embodiment (not shown), the information-bearing layer 14 is a diffractive, optically variable layer or laminate comprising, for example, a metallized diffractive film with holographic icon images, denomination numerals and/or kinetic effects. In another such embodiment (not shown), the information-bearing layer 14 is a multi-layer interference filter having as one of its layers an opaque reflective metal. When contained in the security devices of the present invention, these diffractive and metal layers maintain their colorful, diffractive effect even when subjected to chemical attack or the laundering process.
In another such embodiment (not shown), the information-bearing layer 14 comprises a first magnetic information-bearing layer and a second metal information-bearing layer. As will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, the magnetic information-bearing layer offers additional machine testable features. The combined use of metal and magnetic materials in security threads and the machine detection and reading of codes formed thereby are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,255,948 B1 and in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20020014967 A1.
The metal-free borders 18a, 18b, and the information conveyed by information-bearing layer 14 (e.g., indicia 16, cross thread stops 20) may be formed by any one of a number of methods including, but not limited to, (1) methods involving selective metallization by electrodeposition, directly hot stamping onto the support layer 12 or using a mask or template in a vacuum metallizer, and (2) methods involving metallization and selective demetallization by chemical etching, laser etching and the like. It is preferred that the metal-free borders 18a, 18b and the information be formed on the support layer 12 by a resist and etch technique as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,869,778. It is also preferred that the metal deposited on the support layer 12 have a thickness of from about 100 to about 500 angstroms and more preferably have a thickness of from about 200 to about 300 angstroms.
The protective layer of the present invention is a light-transmitting protective layer having a thickness ranging from about 1 to about 12 microns. The protective layer may take the form of a protective film having a thickness ranging from about 3 to about 12 microns (preferably from about 4 to about 8 microns) or a printed coating having a thickness ranging from about 1 to about 12 microns. By way of the present invention, it has been discovered that films or coatings having thicknesses within the ranges noted above effectively act as barriers to chemical penetration, thereby protecting the information-bearing layer(s) 14 from, for example, dissolution after soaking in caustic, acetone or bleach.
In a preferred embodiment, the protective layer is formed using one or more essentially colorless polymers selected from the group of polyester, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and mixtures thereof. In a more preferred embodiment, the protective layer is a laminated polyester film.
In another preferred embodiment, the protective layer is colored and/or luminescent and, in yet another preferred embodiment, the protective layer provides adhesive properties to bond the security device 10 into or onto paper.
The protective layer may be laminated to the structure formed by the information-bearing layer 14 and the support layer 12 by using a light-transmitting adhesive. By removing metal from the edges and replacing the metal with laminating adhesive there is no corrosive wicking and device 10 can withstand immersion in strong alkali, acids, and any agents that would be reactive with the metal or metallic information-bearing layer 14.
Light-transmitting laminating adhesives, suitable for use in the practice of the present invention, guarantee good bond strength between the protective layer and (i) information-bearing layer 14, (ii) metal-free borders 18a, 18b and, in some embodiments, also (iii) support layer 12. Such materials should be light stable, resistant to ageing, free from fine coagulum and exhibit little foaming. Examples of such light-transmitting laminating adhesives include, but are not limited to, acrylic polymers and copolymers, modified acrylic polymers and copolymers and polyesters. Aqueous systems of these materials are preferred so as to avoid problems associated with solvent wastes and solvent emissions. In a preferred embodiment, the light-transmitting laminating adhesive is an aqueous acrylic polymer dispersion.
As shown in
In another preferred embodiment, and as best shown in
In yet another preferred embodiment, and as best shown in
The security device 10 of the present invention may include additional layers or coatings, provided however that any such additional layers or coatings do not interfere with the visual perception of the information conveyed by way of the information-bearing layer 14 and/or the signals seen by authenticity testing devices. Contemplated additional layers or coatings include light-transmitting adhesive layers on either or both sides of device 10 that facilitate the incorporation of the device into or onto security documents and fluorescent coatings made up of eosin, fluorescein, fluorspar, fuchsin, sulphate of quinine, calcium sulphide, Neodymium salicylate, Samarium gluconate, Yttrium salicylate and the like.
The security device 10, as illustrated for example in
Once the laminated film is prepared, it can be slit to provide narrow threads or strips which are preferably at least 0.8 mm in width, preferably from about 1 to about 5 mm, or even up to 6 or 8 mm in width.
The security article of the present invention is preferably a security paper and the security device 10, which is preferably in the form of a security thread, is either wholly embedded within the paper, or is partially embedded within the paper with portions thereof being exposed at the surface of the paper at spaced intervals along the thread's length at windows or apertures in the paper.
The security thread 10 may be at least partially incorporated in security papers during manufacture by techniques commonly employed in the papermaking industry. For example, the inventive thread 10 may be pressed within wet paper fibers while the fibers are unconsolidated and pliable, as taught by U.S. Pat. No. 4,534,398, resulting in the thread being totally embedded in the resulting paper. The thread 10 may also be fed into a cylinder mold papermaking machine, cylinder vat machine, or similar machine of known type, resulting in partial embedment of the thread within the body of the finished paper (i.e., windowed paper).
In addition to the above, the security device 10 of the present invention may be mounted on the surface of security papers either during or post manufacture. Mounting of the device 10 may be achieved by any number of known techniques including: applying a pressure-sensitive adhesive to a surface of the device 10 and pressing the device 10 to the surface of the paper; and applying a heat activated adhesive to a surface of the device 10 and applying the device 10, using thermal transfer techniques, to the surface of the paper.
As stated above, the durability of security device 10 matches or exceeds the durability of host security articles such as bank notes and the like. In fact, test samples comprising security device 10, in the form of a security thread employing a metallized, diffractive information-bearing layer 14, partially embedded in a security paper, satisfied a number of different durability tests. More specifically, in repeated laundry testing, approximately 98% of the metal of layer 14 in the test samples remained intact. Chemical resistance testing, where the test samples were immersed in: undiluted ethyl acetate for ½ hour; undiluted acetone for 24 hours; 5% sodium hypochlorite for 24 hours; 2% sodium hydroxide for 24 hours; undiluted trichloroethylene for ½ hour; boiling water for ½ hour; 2% biological detergent at a temperature of 95° C. for ½ hour; or 0.5% industrial wash powder plus 1% sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) at a temperature of 95° C. for ½ hour, resulted in 100% of the metal remaining intact. Similar results were obtained when the test samples were subjected to mechanical testing. For example, although wrinkles in security device 10 were observed when the test samples were subjected to IGT Crumpling (dry) 8× and IGT Crumpling (wet) 8×, no loss of metal occurred. Similarly, although surface dullness of the information-bearing layer 14 was observed when the test samples were subjected to Taber Dual Abraser (10 revolutions), no loss of metal occurred. Finally, no change in appearance or metal content occurred when the test samples were subjected to Graminski Flex Tester (2,000 cycles).
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the exemplary embodiments.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4044231 | Beck et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4183989 | Tooth | Jan 1980 | A |
4242378 | Arai | Dec 1980 | A |
4446204 | Kaule et al. | May 1984 | A |
4511616 | Pitts et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4534398 | Crane | Aug 1985 | A |
4584529 | Aoyama | Apr 1986 | A |
4631222 | Sander | Dec 1986 | A |
4631223 | Sander | Dec 1986 | A |
4652015 | Crane | Mar 1987 | A |
4869778 | Cote | Sep 1989 | A |
4941687 | Crane | Jul 1990 | A |
4943093 | Melling et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4960651 | Pettigrew et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4980569 | Crane et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5002636 | Crane | Mar 1991 | A |
5016919 | Rotondo | May 1991 | A |
5042842 | Green et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043201 | Cote | Aug 1991 | A |
5068008 | Crane | Nov 1991 | A |
5082842 | Widmer | Jan 1992 | A |
5093184 | Edwards | Mar 1992 | A |
5112672 | Kaule et al. | May 1992 | A |
5113062 | Fujita et al. | May 1992 | A |
5190318 | Mantegazza | Mar 1993 | A |
5196681 | Mantegazza | Mar 1993 | A |
5265916 | Coe | Nov 1993 | A |
5279403 | Harbaugh et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5284363 | Gartner et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5308992 | Crane et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354099 | Kaule et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5383687 | Suess et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388862 | Edwards | Feb 1995 | A |
5394969 | Harbaugh | Mar 1995 | A |
5417316 | Harbaugh | May 1995 | A |
5419424 | Harbaugh | May 1995 | A |
5447335 | Haslop | Sep 1995 | A |
5457382 | Stein | Oct 1995 | A |
5474638 | Kohlhammer et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486022 | Crane | Jan 1996 | A |
5516153 | Kaule | May 1996 | A |
5535871 | Harbaugh | Jul 1996 | A |
5543911 | Jeffers | Aug 1996 | A |
5545885 | Jagielinski | Aug 1996 | A |
5582927 | Andricacos et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583631 | Lazzerini | Dec 1996 | A |
5599047 | Kaule et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601931 | Hoshino et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5614824 | Dames et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5639126 | Dames et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5697649 | Dames et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5786587 | Colgate, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5803503 | Kaule et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5949050 | Fosbenner et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6086708 | Colgate, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
6146773 | Kaule | Nov 2000 | A |
6168851 | Kubota | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6255948 | Wolpert et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6316082 | Tomkins et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336988 | Enlow et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343745 | Bohm et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364983 | Kay | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376094 | Dames et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6440522 | Duschek et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6454166 | Stenzel et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6474695 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491324 | Schmitz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6549131 | Cote et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20020014967 | Crane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 48 528 | Jun 1997 | DE |
61-115187 | Jun 1986 | JP |
WO 9301057 | Jan 1993 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050040641 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |