This invention is directed to devices and equipment for removing process dust coming from a dust generating machine, such as a sanding machine, and separating the dust from exhaust air flowing from the machine. The invention is more specifically directed to a compact and efficient system for removing the production dust from the work area to a dust collection station located beyond the work area, and which removes a majority of the air from the dust flow.
For many types of machines for processing a workpiece, some means has to be provided to dispense with the grindings, chips, and particulate matter that is generated by the machine during operation. For example, in the case of wood working machines, such as sanders, joiners, and the like, wood that is removed from a workpiece has to be collected and removed from the work area so as to avoid either a breathing hazard for the workman or a fire hazard. More specifically, in the case of portable equipment, such as floor sanders and edgers, it is conventional to draw off the dust that is generated by the machines and then send the air that is carrying the dust into a filter bag arrangement. An alternative technique is to attach a flexible hose or conduit to the dust outlet duct of the machine, and pump the air in the conduit, plus the entrained dust, to a collection station outside. For hand-held and mobile power tools, such as floor sanding equipment, the associated dust collection systems currently in use are cumbersome, impractical, or inadequate.
Two systems are currently in use. In one system, a blower on the machine is used to extract dust from the sanding or cutting operation, and the air and entrained dust go into a filter to collect the dust and filter the air. Work operations have to be suspended frequently to clean the filter and dispose of the collected dust. These maintenance-intense systems blind or clog readily, which reduces the pickup volume at the source, allowing the particulate waste to become airborne or to interfere with the operation. In the second system a flexible hose connects the unit to an external dust collection unit which draws the waste from the tool. These systems do not deliver the necessary air volume to the tool because of intrinsic mechanical problems of delivering air through the extended lengths of flexible tubing. Huge energy requirements and high air velocities are necessary to overcome frictional losses. Frictional losses in ducts increase exponentially with area velocity, so very wide diameter tubing is used, and this relatively large tubing, being quite cumbersome, hinders the operator in using the machine.
The system of long flexible hoses for collecting dust from portable wood sanding machines generally require a combination of a number of different hoses of various diameters, and a series of air pumps and blowers to maintain a satisfactory air draw. In addition, because all of the air that exits the sanding machine has to be carried all the way out to a remote collection station, the flexible hoses are required to have a rather large diameter.
A filter bag that is carried on the portable sanding machine is generally not satisfactory for a number of reasons. First, the bags are either too porous and do not remove enough particulates from the air, or are too fine and tend to clog after a period of operation, choking off the flow of exhaust air from the machine. Also, the bag collection system concentrates the fine particulates of a combustible material (wood dust), and this dust can ignite if a spark or heated material from the sanding operation lands in the bag. Such a situation can produce an explosion, and thus exposes the worker to an unnecessary danger.
A number of cyclonic separators have been proposed, typically for separating particulate matter, such as grain, powders, or dust, from a flow of air. However, to date, no one has proposed or considered mounting a cyclonic separator on a portable sander or other dust generating device so as to concentrate the dust and allow a smaller air flow, and a smaller conduit, to be used is moving the dust to the remote dust collection station.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a highly energy efficient cyclonic separator-based dust collection system that avoids the drawbacks of the prior art.
It is a more specific object to provide a dust collection system in which the air pressure drop is dramatically reduced as compared with prior art dust collection systems.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a dust collection system in which a majority of the separation of dust from the exhaust air and the filtering of the exhaust air are carried out at the dust-generating machine or tool.
It is another object to provide dust collection system which reduces the power requirement, and also reduces the inherent fire or explosion hazard of the dust collection equipment.
According to an aspect of the invention, a compact and efficient dust collection system is provided for collecting production dust from a floor sander or other source machine that generates such dust in a production operation. The source machine has an internal blower for picking up the dust that the machine generates and exhausting the dust, entrained in a stream of air, to an exhaust outlet on the source machine. A compact, low-volume cyclonic separator is mounted on the source machine. The cyclonic separator has an inlet portion at the top, and an inner tubular baffle coaxial with the upper inlet portion and having open ends. The inlet portion and inner baffle define between them an annular inlet space. A frustoconic portion beneath the upper inlet portion and having a wide end joined at the inlet portion and this descends to a narrow lower end, where there is a dust outlet duct. An inlet duct receives the air flow and exhaust dust from the machine and injects this air flow into the annular inlet space. a pleated air filter, or equivalent air cleaning means, is situated above cyclonic separator for cleaning air that passes out through the tubular baffle. This permits the filtered clean air to return into the ambient air in the vicinity of the source machine. The dust is then concentrated at the bottom of the cyclonic separator. An elongated flexible duct or hose is coupled from the dust outlet duct of the cyclonic separator to a dust collection station positioned remote from said source machine. Because the dust is concentrated in the cyclonic separator, the air flow or volume required for conveying the dust to the dust collection station is reduced by a factor of between five and ten as compared with the systems discussed previously. This is because the secondary air flow between the separator and the dust collection station is used only for moving the preseparated dust, and does not have to supply the correspondingly greater air volume that is required to extract the waste dust from the cutting operation at the tool. Because the secondary air flow is reduced so greatly, a much smaller diameter hose can be used, typically ¾ inch to 1 inch. This tubing can be bundled with the electric cord for the tool, and thus will not interfere with operation of the sander or other tool.
In a preferred embodiment, a rigid hollow conduit both serves as the tubing connecting the outlet of the machine to the cyclonic separator and as the means for supporting the cyclone separator on the machine.
The system can be run at a lower power requirement, e.g., at 110 volts, which is an advantage in that many non-commercial locations do not have 220 volts or three-phase power. The operator can continue to work without interruption, as the dust is carried to a much larger receptacle at the dust collection station. There is increased fire safety, as the heat and sparks that can result from the grinding or sanding operation are far from the dust storage location. An improved inlet port for the cyclonic separator permits superior dust pickup and better separation with less back pressure resulting from the separation. Industrial hygiene is vastly improved.
The above and many other objects features, and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the ensuing detailed description of the preferred embodiments, which is illustrated in the accompanying Drawing.
Now with reference to the Drawing,
A dust generating machine or tool, here a floor sanding machine 12, has a built-in exhaust blower 14 that vacuums up any sanding dust produced and discharges it upwards through an upright pipe 16. An inlet-connection ell 18 is mounted at a top end of the pipe 16, and a compact cyclonic separator 20 is supported on the ell 18. In this embodiment, the cyclonic separator 20 has a barrel or drum 22 at its upper end. The cyclonic separator can be described with additional reference to
A frustoconic cyclone portion 34 has a wide, upper mouth joined to the barrel 22, and the cyclone portion 34 tapers downward to a smaller opening at its nose, where a dust cup 36 collects the sanding dust that is separated from the spiraling internal air flow. An dust outlet pipe or exhaust pipe 38 protrudes from the dust cup 36, and an elongated flexible hose or conduit 40 (see
An air filter assembly 44 positioned atop the cyclonic separator 20 filters the air that flows from the sanding machine 12 and through the separator 20, and returns the filtered air back to the ambient space. As shown in
In this embodiment, an upper portion 64 of the baffle 26 protrudes above the annular plate 28, forming a cylindrical flange that fits into a circular opening (not shown) in the base of the cartridge 50.
As also shown in
An annular plate 84 closes off the top of the barrel 74, and a support bracket 86, here formed with two upwardly extending legs, rises vertically above the opening at the center of the plate 84. a post 88 with internal female threads is supported on top of the bracket 86. a thumb wheel 90, having a male threaded shaft (not shown), is used to secure a pleated cylindrical filter cartridge 92 in place against the top of the cyclonic separator 70.
Details of the remote collection station 42 of this embodiment are illustrated in
Referring again to
Because the dust and exhaust are from the tool are separated out at the cyclone separators 20 and 70, only a small amount of air flow is needed to carry away the dust to the remote dust collection station 42. The air volume to the tool can be reduced by a factor of between five and ten times, because it is only used to extract the preseperated waste, and is not supplying the considerably greater air volume needed to extract the waste from the cutting or sanding operation.
The independent stand-alone dust collection station 42 downstream of the filter/separation 20 and 70 contains all the processing waste from the portable processing equipment, which is recovered by means of a small negative pressure operating through the cyclone separator 94. The drum or barrel 100 can be provided with a plastic bag liner. As the dust barrel is at a negative pressure, a vacuum bag hold down feature is employed, in which a hose 116 extends from the pump 114 to a vacuum inlet fitting 118 on the barrel 100, to maintain a vacuum or negative pressure between the barrel and the plastic bag liner to draw and hold the bag to the inside of the barrel. The bag can be tied off and lifted out when full, thus eliminating the need to dump. This also keeps the operators from being exposed to the fines and dust contained in the bag. The independent stand-alone nature of the waste collection drum or barrel 100 also allows for different size barrels to be interchanged easily and cost effectively, accommodating the scope of the project and the volume of waste material to be collected.
The advantages over the prior art dust collection systems can be quickly summarized as follow: There is a low power/low energy requirement, and the system can be powered entirely from a 110V single phase supply. The small flexible tubing 40 for carrying the dust from the tools makes machine operation vastly easier, and the tubing can even be bundled with the power cord for the tool. The operator does not need to interrupt the sanding, grinding, or finishing process for the purpose of unclogging or emptying bags or filters, or for removing waste bags from the tool or machine, as the waste material is carried continuously from the tool to a large off-worksite container. There is improved fire safety as any friction-induced flame or sparks will not reach the storage location for the combustible waste materials; that is, the waste collection barrel is far downstream of the grinding or sanding operation, and is at a location far from the operator. The high-efficiency cyclone separators, with low pressure drop inlet tubes, provide for superior dust pick up at the tool, and permit the waste material to be carried off without significant back pressure. The filter service interval is also very long, and pressure loss through the filter cartridges is also very low. The filtration of air and separation of dust vastly improves the industrial hygiene for the operators.
While the invention has been described hereinabove with reference to a few preferred embodiments, it should be apparent that the invention is not limited to such embodiments. Rather, many variations would be apparent to persons of skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention, as defined in the appended Claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
926206 | Morse | Jun 1909 | A |
1260407 | Lachmann et al. | Mar 1918 | A |
1897144 | Prouty | Feb 1933 | A |
1905458 | Gaffney | Apr 1933 | A |
2616563 | Hebb | Nov 1952 | A |
2770924 | Mead et al. | Nov 1956 | A |
3120432 | Aldrich | Feb 1964 | A |
3392513 | Hedin | Jul 1968 | A |
3426513 | Bauer | Feb 1969 | A |
3485671 | Stephens | Dec 1969 | A |
3513642 | Cornett | May 1970 | A |
3533327 | Hagerty | Oct 1970 | A |
3618302 | Cornett | Nov 1971 | A |
3653190 | Lee et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3771294 | Ronning | Nov 1973 | A |
3850816 | Koch | Nov 1974 | A |
3953184 | Stockford et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4133658 | Callewyn | Jan 1979 | A |
4198290 | Summers | Apr 1980 | A |
4201256 | Truhan | May 1980 | A |
4223748 | Barendsen | Sep 1980 | A |
4232487 | Brown | Nov 1980 | A |
4234274 | Hoshall | Nov 1980 | A |
4246013 | Truhan et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4326864 | Sittler | Apr 1982 | A |
4344538 | Fujisawa et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4367665 | Terpstra et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4572726 | Van Abbema | Feb 1986 | A |
4576072 | Terpstra et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4581050 | Krantz | Apr 1986 | A |
4600410 | Baillie et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4646482 | Chitjian | Mar 1987 | A |
4735639 | Johnstone | Apr 1988 | A |
4820315 | DeMarco | Apr 1989 | A |
4865629 | Zievers et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4917712 | Crigler | Apr 1990 | A |
4977638 | Best | Dec 1990 | A |
4984397 | Van Leeuwen | Jan 1991 | A |
5056275 | Wada et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080697 | Finke | Jan 1992 | A |
5106488 | Jonasson | Apr 1992 | A |
5158583 | Bodin et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163786 | Christianson | Nov 1992 | A |
5195640 | Seaverns | Mar 1993 | A |
5231805 | Sander | Aug 1993 | A |
5254147 | Finke | Oct 1993 | A |
5271751 | Lagler | Dec 1993 | A |
5529530 | McPhee et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5606767 | Crlenjak et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5716260 | Griffin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5743925 | Bench | Apr 1998 | A |
6289956 | Shriver | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6434784 | Wisser | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471751 | Semanderes et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6482078 | Pittman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6840972 | Kim | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7074261 | Murphy | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20040053561 | Pieper | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10402441 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 11357894 | US |