1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to dust shrouds. More specifically, the present invention relates to a dust shroud for rotary tools such as die grinders.
2. State of the Art
Dust shrouds have become more commonly used for many reasons. Die grinders, for example, are commonly used for grinding, paint removal, and other tasks. Without a dust shroud, debris is scattered over a wide area. It is desirable to contain the dust which is created for several reasons. It is desirable to contain the dust and debris to keep the workplace cleaner and to minimize the time necessary to clean up afterwards. Fine dust is often created which can be quite difficult to clean up afterwards. It is also desirable to contain the dust and debris to keep the same from getting into the tool itself, causing premature failure of the bearings, motor, etc. Additionally, debris such as paint dust poses a health risk to the machine operator and others who may breathe it. It is desirable to collect the dust to minimize any exposure.
Right angle die grinders are often used to remove paint from airplanes and other objects. In such a situation, it is not desirable that the paint debris is spread over the airplane as it may require extensive cleanup. Airplane paint often contains metals such as chromium and cadmium for corrosion protection. Workers may use a die grinder to remove paint from the airplane to service the airplane, repaint the airplane, etc. It is desirable to collect all of the paint which is removed to avoid environmental contamination or damage to the worker's health.
Paint removal with a die grinder typically involves the use of a mandrel with a backing pad that is mounted in the die grinder and an abrasive disk that is mounted to the backing pad. Commonly used abrasive disks require a half turn to lock the disk into the backing pad. One difficulty in providing dust shrouds for rotary tools is that the dust shroud will likely cover the collet and nut used to hold the mandrel and backing pad into the die grinder. Thus, the mandrel and backing pad are not easily installed after the shroud is in place. The shroud, however, ideally extends around the back of the backing pad and would be difficult to install if the mandrel and backing pad are mounted to the die grinder. Additionally, it is difficult to remove and attach the abrasive disks if a dust shroud is covering the collet, nut, and backing pad. Abrasive disks are typically replaced frequently during use as they wear.
The lack of an available dust shroud for rotary tools has resulted in workers being exposed to hazardous materials, or in companies having to create a large dust-sealed environment for performing work. Both of these situations are undesirable as they result in either increased cost or increased exposure to hazardous chemicals.
There is thus a need for a dust shroud for a die grinder or similar rotary tools. There is a need for a dust shroud which may be mounted easily to the tool after a mandrel has already been mounted to the tool, and which allows for easy replacement of abrasive disks.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved dust shroud for rotary tools such as die grinders.
According to one aspect of the invention, a dust shroud is provided which is split into two halves and which is assembled in place on the rotary tool. This allows the dust shroud to be placed on the tool after a mandrel or backing pad has been attached to the tool.
According to another aspect of the invention, the dust shroud allows some access to the collet or collet nut to allow a user to lock the shaft of the tool to facilitate attachment or removal of an abrasive disk from a mandrel.
These and other aspects of the present invention are realized in a universal dust shield as shown and described in the following figures and related description.
Various embodiments of the present invention are shown and described in reference to the numbered drawings wherein:
It will be appreciated that the drawings are illustrative and not limiting of the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims. The embodiments shown accomplish various aspects and objects of the invention. It is appreciated that it is not possible to clearly show each element and aspect of the invention in a single figure, and as such, multiple figures are presented to separately illustrate the various details of the invention in greater clarity. Similarly, not every embodiment need accomplish all advantages of the present invention.
The invention and accompanying drawings will now be discussed in reference to the numerals provided therein so as to enable one skilled in the art to practice the present invention. The drawings and descriptions are exemplary of various aspects of the invention and are not intended to narrow the scope of the appended claims.
Turning now to
An abrasive pad 50 is mounted to the backing pad 46 via a mounting post 54 with a coarse screw thread 58. The backing pad 46 has a corresponding receptacle. The abrasive pad 50 and backing pad 46 are designed to allow the abrasive pad to be easily mounted without tools. A user simply twists the abrasive pad 50 relative to the backing pad 46 with their hands. The user needs sufficient access to either hold the backing pad 46 or lock the shaft 30 to do so.
Turning now to
The dust shroud 100 includes a front half 104 and a back half 108 which attach together. The shroud halves 104, 108 include tabs 112 which have holes 116 or threaded inserts 120 which receive bolts to connect the halves together. The front half 104 of the shroud includes flanges 122 which receive a portion of the back half 108 of the shroud to make the shroud 100 stronger and more secure during use. The upper body portion 124 of the shroud halves 104, 108 is shaped to fit snugly around the die grinder 10 to hold the shroud 100 in place. The shroud 100 includes an enlarged portion 128 which extends around the backing pad 46 and abrasive pad 50. The enlarged portion 128 includes a horizontally extending top 132 and a skirt 136.
As is seen, the back half 108 of the shroud 100 has an angled upper portion 110 which extends backwards at a right angle to the axis of the die grinder collet 34 and abrasive pad 50. The angled upper portion 110 extends along the handle portion of a right angle die grinder to help secure and stabilize the dust shroud 100. The dust shroud 100 is particularly used with a right angle die grinder since this die grinder is commonly used in applications which may generate hazardous dust, such as removing paint, and because such a dust shroud has been unavailable for such a die grinder.
As shown in
It will be appreciated in viewing the shroud 100 that it is difficult to mount a mandrel 42 with backing pad 46 in the collet 34 after a shroud is installed on the die grinder 10. This is because the die grinder obstructs access to the collet 34 and collet nut 38. The shroud 100 thus includes a front half 104 and back half 108 which may be assembled to the die grinder 10 after mounting the mandrel 42 in the collet 34. The shroud 100 provides a design which is easy to install on a die grinder or other similar tool after mounting a mandrel 42 in the collet 34 while still providing a shroud which is strong and not easily broken during use.
It is generally not problematic to require removal of the shroud 100 in order to remove the mandrel 42 and backing pad 46, as the mandrel is not frequently changed while a person is using the die grinder 10. As has been discussed, however, the abrasive pad 50 is changed frequently during use as the abrasive wears out. It is thus desirable to be able to change the abrasive pad 50 without removal of the shroud 100, thus promoting worker compliance in using the shroud. If a worker had to remove the shroud 100 in order to change the abrasive pad 50, many workers would simply leave the shroud off of the die grinder and not use the shroud.
The front half 104 of the shroud 100 is provided with holes 144 which allow a thin wrench to be inserted to engage the collet 34 or collet nut 38. The holes 144 could also be provided in the back half 108 of the shroud 100 if desired.
While the abrasive pad 50 is relatively easy to remove by hand, it can not be removed if the shaft 30 is freely spinning. The holes 144 and wrench 148 are beneficial as they provide a safe way to lock the shaft 30 and replace the abrasive pad 50. Without a convenient way to lock the shaft 30, a user may choose to not use the shroud 100, or may try to push a finger or other object between the backing pad 46 and shroud skirt 136 to lock the shaft 30. Both of these situations results in increased safety risks to the user.
There is thus disclosed an improved dust shroud for rotary tools. It will be appreciated that numerous changes may be made to the present invention without departing from the scope of the claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/021,323, filed Jan. 15, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
907734 | Butterfield | Dec 1908 | A |
1123562 | Lund | Jan 1915 | A |
RE15262 | Gurgel | Jan 1922 | E |
1643882 | Faiver | Sep 1927 | A |
2032382 | Torrison | Mar 1936 | A |
2041689 | Baumeister et al. | May 1936 | A |
2291269 | Wiggleworth | Jul 1942 | A |
2478074 | Atkin | Aug 1949 | A |
2503854 | Trainor | Apr 1950 | A |
2520725 | Judd | Aug 1950 | A |
2803098 | Robert et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
2819570 | Tocci-Guilbert et al. | Jan 1958 | A |
2819571 | Morgan | Jan 1958 | A |
2994995 | Rolland | Aug 1961 | A |
3166877 | Reames | Jan 1965 | A |
3256648 | Subonovich | Jun 1966 | A |
3468076 | Jones | Sep 1969 | A |
3667170 | MacKay, Jr. | Jun 1972 | A |
3673744 | Oimoen | Jul 1972 | A |
3835543 | Polydoris et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3848686 | Jysky et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3862521 | Isaksson | Jan 1975 | A |
3882598 | Earle et al. | May 1975 | A |
3882644 | Cusumano | May 1975 | A |
4002182 | Michel | Jan 1977 | A |
4063478 | Stuy | Dec 1977 | A |
4090297 | Wanner et al. | May 1978 | A |
4135334 | Rudiger | Jan 1979 | A |
4253362 | Olson | Mar 1981 | A |
4381628 | Dicke | May 1983 | A |
4400995 | Palm | Aug 1983 | A |
4574532 | Haberle et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4576072 | Terpstra et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4622782 | Roestenberg | Nov 1986 | A |
4697389 | Romine | Oct 1987 | A |
4761877 | Rupp | Aug 1988 | A |
4782632 | Matechuk | Nov 1988 | A |
4868949 | Loveless et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4932163 | Chilton et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932164 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5033552 | Hu | Jul 1991 | A |
5074044 | Duncan et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5084972 | Waugh | Feb 1992 | A |
5105585 | Hampl et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5125190 | Buser et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5163252 | Garner et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167215 | Harding, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5201785 | Nagano | Apr 1993 | A |
5237781 | Demetrius | Aug 1993 | A |
5327649 | Skinner | Jul 1994 | A |
5339571 | Timmons et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5411433 | Keller | May 1995 | A |
5435066 | Bare et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440809 | Padilla | Aug 1995 | A |
5545082 | Courson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558571 | Toyoshima et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5564408 | Bassols | Oct 1996 | A |
5566457 | Batschari et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575035 | Reis et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588213 | Swanberg | Dec 1996 | A |
5609516 | Courson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5653561 | May | Aug 1997 | A |
5675895 | Mori et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688082 | Richardson | Nov 1997 | A |
5704956 | Loveless et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713785 | Nishio | Feb 1998 | A |
D392531 | Richardson | Mar 1998 | S |
5774992 | Lindenmuth | Jul 1998 | A |
5791979 | Duncan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5816733 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5931072 | Shibata | Aug 1999 | A |
5954863 | Loveless et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6027399 | Stewart | Feb 2000 | A |
6053674 | Thompson | Apr 2000 | A |
6108912 | Radigan | Aug 2000 | A |
6138317 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167626 | Doumani et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219922 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6318352 | Gnazzo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347985 | Loveless | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6471574 | Rupprecht et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6557261 | Buser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6648742 | Segiel Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6699114 | Booeshagi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726554 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748660 | Buser et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6796208 | Jorgensen | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6811476 | Ohlendorf | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855040 | Huber | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860799 | Loveless | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878050 | Wendt et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6902594 | Cho | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935939 | Buser et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7047647 | Muller et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7047650 | Chen | May 2006 | B2 |
7195429 | Dods et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197826 | Baxivanelis et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7198559 | Walstrum et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223161 | Kodani et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7625265 | Woods et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7635293 | Sun et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7661195 | Wood et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7740086 | Bleicher et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7892075 | Esenwein | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20050088866 | Levine | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060019585 | Zayat | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070178815 | Buser | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193759 | Sweig et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070251104 | Heinrichs et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080060631 | Dofher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080099053 | Loveless | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109986 | Loveless | May 2008 | A1 |
20080200103 | Esenwein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080271323 | Perlmutter | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090181604 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181605 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181606 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183377 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183800 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090186559 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090311953 | Maute et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
556713 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0579964 | Jan 1994 | EP |
2 260 721 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2262159 | Jun 1993 | GB |
10-000559 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10015717 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2001096525 | Apr 2001 | JP |
10-2002-0056086 | Jul 2002 | KR |
WO 9944786 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090181604 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61021323 | Jan 2008 | US |