1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to dust shrouds. More specifically, the present invention relates to a universal dust shroud for angle grinders.
2. State of the Art
Dust shrouds have become more commonly used for multiple purposes. Angle grinders, for example, are commonly used for grinding cement or other similar tasks. Without a dust shroud, debris is scattered over a wide area. It is desirable to contain the dust which is created for several reasons. It is desirable to contain the dust and debris to keep the workplace cleaner and to minimize the time necessary to clean up afterwards. Fine dust is often created while grinding cement, for example, which spreads a large distance and can be quite difficult to clean up afterwards. It is also desirable to contain the dust and debris to keep the same from getting into the tool itself, causing premature failure of the bearings, motor, etc. Additionally, debris such as concrete dust poses a health risk to the machine operator and others who may breathe it. It is thus desirable to collect the dust to minimize any exposure to the dust.
One difficulty in providing dust shrouds is the fact that each particular tool will have different mounting requirements. For angle grinders, each grinder will typically have a collar which is concentric to the output shaft which may be used to mount a dust shroud. For each grinder, however, the collar may be a different diameter and may be a different height from the grinding disk. As such, the dust shroud must accommodate the particular mounting diameter and height of the desired tool. Another difficulty in providing dust shrouds is in providing a dust shroud which does not overly interfere with the use of the grinder itself.
It is thus appreciated that the requirements for a dust shroud varies according to the particular angle grinder with which the dust shroud is being used. Many stores, however, do not wish to stock many different models of dust shrouds. It is similarly not desirable for a manufacturer to make many different models of dust shrouds, as it increases the tooling and production costs. Individual consumers do not wish to special order a dust shroud and wait for weeks for it to arrive. There is thus a need for universal dust shrouds which allow a single shroud to be used with many different brands of tools while still performing properly. Such a universal dust shroud should safely and securely mount to a wide variety of angle grinders while effectively collecting dust and debris and without interfering with the use of the angle grinder.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved universal dust shroud.
According to one aspect of the invention, a dust shroud is provided which is adjustable to fit varying diameters of mounting collars on different tools. The mounting brackets which attach to the collar are movable inwardly or outwardly to accommodate different tool sizes.
According to another aspect of the invention, the distance between the mounting brackets and the shroud body is adjustable to properly position the shroud around the grinding disk.
According to another aspect of the invention, the shroud body is vertically movable relative to the mounting brackets during use so as to allow the operator to contact a surface with the grinding disk as desired.
These and other aspects of the present invention are realized in a universal dust shield as shown and described in the following figures and related description.
Various embodiments of the present invention are shown and described in reference to the numbered drawings wherein:
It will be appreciated that the drawings are illustrative and not limiting of the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims. The embodiments shown accomplish various aspects and objects of the invention. It is appreciated that it is not possible to clearly show each element and aspect of the invention in a single figure, and as such, multiple figures are presented to separately illustrate the various details of the invention in greater clarity. Similarly, not every embodiment need accomplish all advantages of the present invention.
The invention and accompanying drawings will now be discussed in reference to the numerals provided therein so as to enable one skilled in the art to practice the present invention. The drawings and descriptions are exemplary of various aspects of the invention and are not intended to narrow the scope of the appended claims.
Turning now to
In order to accommodate a variety of different angle grinders with a single shroud 10, the shroud includes three mounting brackets 34 which are attached to the body 14. The mounting brackets 34 are attached to the body 14 via slots 38, and can slide inwardly and outwardly to adjust the space between the mounting brackets. A worm drive hose clamp 42 is held in slots in the brackets 34 and is used to securely fasten the brackets to an angle grinder so that the output shaft of the angle grinder passes through the hole 46.
The brackets are typically attached to the body 14 by bolts which pass through the slots 38 and springs 50 and are secured to the brackets 34. While the present invention describes the use of springs 50, it will be appreciated that many biasing elements such as a resilient foam or elastomeric tubing such as vinyl, silicone, or latex tubing will provide the desired amount of flexibility and movement. Thus, although described primarily as springs 50, the biasing element 50 may be a flexible tube or piece of foam and such is intended to be included in the definition of biasing elements or springs as used herein. The springs 50 allow some compression between the brackets 34 and the body 14, allowing the operator flexibility in choosing which part of the grinding disk contacts the work surface and in choosing how much pressure to apply while grinding.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
Turning now to
While described primarily as a bolt 58 and nut 66, the brackets 34 may be attached to the body 14 with other fasteners such as a metal pin or the like. Bolts 58 and nuts 66 are preferable as they are adjustable in length and commonly available. Thus, if the bolts 58 or nuts 66 become damaged or worn they may be easily replaced. The length of the bolt 58 extending from the nut 66 may be easily adjusted to adjust the height of the brackets 34 relative to the body 14, allowing a user to better fit the shroud to a particular angle grinder or to a particular grinding disk or pad which is taller or thinner.
In use, the shroud body 14 will often extend slightly below a grinding disk and the user will press on the shroud in order to press the grinding disk into the work surface. The springs 50 allow the shroud to move upwardly relative to the grinding disk and allow a grinding disk to be pressed against the work surface while keeping the shroud body 14 against the work surface to collect the dust and debris. Thus, the user may set the resting position of the shroud 10 relative to the angle grinder so that the shroud extends around the grinding disk and encloses it. While using the grinder, the user would press the grinder downwardly towards a surface, typically causing the shroud 10 to first contact the surface, causing one or more of the springs 50 to compress to thereby allow the shroud to move upwardly relative to the angle grinder and grinding disk, and allowing the grinding disk to contact the work surface as desired.
The bracket 34 has a slot 70 which receives the clamp 42. When the brackets 34 are not fastened to an angle grinder via clamp 42, the brackets 34 are able to move back and forth in the slots 38 to adjust to the size of the opening between the brackets 34. The opening is adjusted to find a desired angle grinder, and the angle grinder is placed into the opening. The clamp 42 is then tightened to hold the brackets 34 securely against the angle grinder. The arrangement of the slots 38 prevent movement of the body 14 relative to the brackets 34 once the shroud 10 is installed on the angle grinder, preventing accidental contact between the shroud body 14 and a grinding disk.
The shroud 10 is significantly easier to install than available universal dust shrouds and fits a greater range of sizes of angle grinders. Other designs require the operator to tighten multiple band clamps and screws to attach the shroud to a grinder where the present shroud only requires the user to tighten a single band clamp 42. Additionally, the shroud provides increased adjustability in mounting the shroud to the angle grinder, and allows the mounted shroud skirt to move relative to the grinding disk while the grinder is in use, allowing the operator greater flexibility in using the grinder while still properly collecting the dust and debris generated by the grinder.
There is thus disclosed an improved universal dust shroud. It will be appreciated that numerous changes may be made to the present invention without departing from the scope of the claims.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/021,322, filed Jan. 15, 2008, which is expressly incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
907734 | Butterfield | Dec 1908 | A |
1123562 | Lund | Jan 1915 | A |
RE15262 | Gurgel | Jan 1922 | E |
1643882 | Faiver | Sep 1927 | A |
2032382 | Torrison | Mar 1936 | A |
2041689 | Baumeister et al. | May 1936 | A |
2291269 | Wiggleworth | Jul 1942 | A |
2478074 | Atkin | Aug 1949 | A |
2503854 | Trainor | Apr 1950 | A |
2520725 | Judd | Aug 1950 | A |
2803098 | Robert et al. | Aug 1957 | A |
2819570 | Tocci-Guilbert et al. | Jan 1958 | A |
2819571 | Morgan | Jan 1958 | A |
2994995 | Griffith | Aug 1961 | A |
3166877 | Reames | Jan 1965 | A |
3468076 | Jones | Sep 1969 | A |
3667170 | MacKay | Jun 1972 | A |
3673744 | Oimoen | Jul 1972 | A |
3835543 | Polydoris et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3848686 | Jysky et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3862521 | Isaksson | Jan 1975 | A |
3882598 | Earle et al. | May 1975 | A |
3882644 | Cusumano | May 1975 | A |
4002182 | Michel | Jan 1977 | A |
4063478 | Stuy | Dec 1977 | A |
4090297 | Wanner et al. | May 1978 | A |
4135334 | Rudiger | Jan 1979 | A |
4253362 | Olson | Mar 1981 | A |
4381628 | Dicke | May 1983 | A |
4400995 | Palm | Aug 1983 | A |
4574532 | Haberle et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4576072 | Terpstra et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4622782 | Roestenberg | Nov 1986 | A |
4697389 | Romine | Oct 1987 | A |
4761877 | Rupp | Aug 1988 | A |
4782632 | Matechuk | Nov 1988 | A |
4868949 | Loveless et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4932163 | Chilton et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4932164 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5033552 | Hu | Jul 1991 | A |
5074044 | Duncan et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5084972 | Waugh | Feb 1992 | A |
5105585 | Hampl et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5125190 | Buser et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5163252 | Garner et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5167215 | Harding, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5201785 | Nagano | Apr 1993 | A |
5237781 | Demetrius | Aug 1993 | A |
5327649 | Skinner | Jul 1994 | A |
5339571 | Timmons et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5411433 | Keller | May 1995 | A |
5435066 | Bare et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440809 | Padilla | Aug 1995 | A |
5545082 | Courson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558571 | Toyoshima et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5564408 | Bassols | Oct 1996 | A |
5566457 | Batschari et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575035 | Reis et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588213 | Swanberg | Dec 1996 | A |
5609516 | Courson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5653561 | May | Aug 1997 | A |
5675895 | Mori et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688082 | Richardson | Nov 1997 | A |
5704956 | Loveless et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713785 | Nishio | Feb 1998 | A |
D392531 | Richardson | Mar 1998 | S |
5774992 | Lindenmuth | Jul 1998 | A |
5791979 | Duncan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5816733 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5931072 | Shibata | Aug 1999 | A |
5954863 | Loveless et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6027399 | Stewart | Feb 2000 | A |
6053674 | Thompson | Apr 2000 | A |
6108912 | Radigan | Aug 2000 | A |
6138317 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167626 | Doumani et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219922 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6318352 | Gnazzo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347985 | Loveless | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6471574 | Rupprecht et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6557261 | Buser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6648742 | Segiel Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6699114 | Booeshaghi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6726554 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748660 | Buser et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6796208 | Jorgensen | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6811476 | Ohlendorf | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855040 | Huber | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860799 | Loveless | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878050 | Wendt et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6896604 | Taylor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6902594 | Cho | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935939 | Buser et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7047647 | Muller et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7047650 | Chen | May 2006 | B2 |
7195429 | Dods et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197826 | Baxivanelis et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7223161 | Kodani et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7625265 | Woods et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7635293 | Sun et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7661195 | Wood et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7892075 | Esenwein | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20050088866 | Levine | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060019585 | Zayat | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070178815 | Buser | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193759 | Sweig et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070251104 | Heinrichs et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080060631 | Dofher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080099053 | Loveless | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109986 | Loveless | May 2008 | A1 |
20080200103 | Esenwein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080271323 | Perlmutter | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090181604 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181605 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090181606 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183377 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183800 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090186559 | Loveless | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090311953 | Maute et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
556713 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0579964 | Jan 1994 | EP |
2 260 721 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2262159 | Jun 1993 | GB |
10-000559 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10015717 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2001096525 | Apr 2001 | JP |
10-2002-0056086 | Jul 2002 | KR |
WO 9944786 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090181605 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61021322 | Jan 2008 | US |