The present disclosure generally relates to a stability control system with engine control for providing optimum performance and control of dynamic active motions of a marine vessel, watercraft or boat (collectively, a marine vessel for brevity). More particularly, the present disclosure is directed to an improved dynamic active control system (DACS) configured to receive data output from a plurality of sensors and control the deployment of the actuators to cause the vessel to operate with desired pitch, roll and yaw axis control.
The following terms and related definitions are used in the marine stabilization industry. “Trim Control” means the control of the average angle about the lateral or pitch axis of a marine vessel, averaged over one second or more. “List Control” or “Roll Control” means the control of the average angle about the longitudinal or roll axis of a marine vessel, averaged over one second or more. “Yaw Control” means the control of the average angle about the yaw axis of a marine vessel, averaged over one second or more. A “Water Engagement Device” or “WED” means a mechanical or electromechanical device configured to generates a variable amount of lift in a marine vessel by selective engagement of the device with or into the water flow under or adjacent to a transom surface of the marine vessel when the marine vessel is underway in a certain (or forward) direction or by changing the angle of attack of the device relative to the water flow during operation of a marine vessel in a forward direction. A WED can also be referred to as a Controller in the system disclosed herein and any reference to a Controller and/or a WED means the same device. A WED delta position is defined as the difference between port and starboard WED deployments. “Deployment” means selective engagement of the WED with or into the water flow or a change in the WED angle of attack. A Roll Moment in a marine vessel is the result of a force applied to the vessel that causes the vessel to rotate about its longitudinal or roll axis. A Pitch Moment in a marine vessel is the result of a force applied to the vessel that causes the vessel to rotate about its lateral or pitch axis. A Yaw Moment in a marine vessel is the result of a force applied to the vessel that causes the vessel to rotate about its vertical or yaw axis. For instance, (1) a “Roll Moment” can be generated if the port and starboard WEDs are deployed asymmetrically in a marine vessel that may cause the vessel to roll; (2) a “Yaw Moment” can be generated when port and starboard WEDs are deployed asymmetrically which may cause a heading change; and (3) a “Pitch Moment” can be generated if the port and starboard WEDs are deployed symmetrically or if a single WED is deployed about the center of the marine vessel which may cause the vessel to pitch.
Conventional marine stabilization techniques for when a vessel is underway in a forward direction include proportional deployment of WEDs to generate a continuous lift at the transom of the vessel for trim control while allowing adjustment of the angles (e.g., along the roll, pitch and yaw axis) of the marine vessel. A few examples of commercially available WEDs—not to be considered exhaustive by any means—are interceptors, trim tabs, and fins and other similar devices that can engage the water flow in similar fashion and provide similar functionality.
An alternate marine stabilization technique for when a vessel is not underway is a gyroscopic stabilization system that, in one of the commercially available versions, generates a torque that is proportional to the rate of precession and angular momentum. In such a gyroscopic stabilization system, a torque is applied to one or more axes depending on the orientation of the spin axis and its precession angle. The amount of torque applied to the roll, pitch and/or yaw axis can be calculated as a function of angular momentum, rate of precession, angle of precession, and precession orientation of the control moment gyroscope. The system disclosed herein makes it possible to calculate the engine steering angle change (or change in the rudder position) that would counter the torque applied about the yaw axis from a control moment gyroscopic stabilization system.
Marine stabilization technologies are key to experiencing the joy of cruising over waters without the attendant random environmentally induced disturbances of the boat. These disturbances—for example, a sudden unexpected roll—can be annoying and disruptive for boaters. In the existing prior art systems, WEDs are designed and configured to control list and trim—to get the marine vessel to an average angle in the roll and pitch axis. Smaller marine vessels used in the recreational market generally have manually actuated WEDs, while larger vessels operating in the commercial space use automatic actuated WEDs to stabilize the motion. However, such prior art systems do not combine DACS with engine control for complete vessel stabilization.
In addition, there are no currently available prior art recreational or commercial stability control systems that combine the fast deployment of WEDs with engine trim adjustments and engine steering angle adjustment. More specifically, prior art systems lack the combination of fast deployment of WEDs with adjustment of the engine steering angle of the marine vessel to counter changes in drag due to asymmetric deployment, gyroscopic stabilization yaw moment, and/or adjustment of the engine trim for dynamic control in the pitch axis.
In view of the foregoing disadvantages of prior art systems in the relevant field of marine stabilization, there is clearly a market need for an improved stability control system of a marine vessel—a dynamic active control system (DACS) configured to simultaneously control accelerations, rates and angles in the roll, pitch and yaw axes of the marine vessel and engine trim and engine steering angle adjustments of the marine vessel. The DACS disclosed herein provides significant technological advantages from conventional systems while overcoming the disadvantages of the prior art systems, as discussed below.
The present disclosure is directed to a DACS configured for simultaneous control of marine vessel motions in all three axes, namely pitch, roll and yaw by fast deployment and actuation of the WEDs. The DACS is configured with proprietary inertial sensing hardware and software in order to learn, capture and make a determination and/or predict the various motions of the marine vessel in all three axes and command deployment of the actuator blades to counteract any pitch, roll, and yaw motions of the vessel as well as total vessel pitch axis control facilitated by fast symmetric deployment of WEDs—alternatively referred as Controllers in the system disclosed herein—coupled with engine trim adjustments.
In an embodiment, the DACS is configured to provide total vessel roll axis and heading control by differentially deploying WEDs to counter rolling motions while simultaneously adjusting engine steering (or rudder) position to counter the steering moment associated with differentially deployed WEDs. In alternative embodiments, WEDs can be referred herein as Controllers and/or vice versa in the DACS disclosed herein. The novel DACS disclosed herein can (1) simultaneous control of motions in all three axes (total vessel pitch axis control) by fast symmetric deployment of WEDs, coupled with engine trim adjustments; (2) provide total roll and heading control by differentially deploying WEDs to counter rolling motions while simultaneously adjusting engine steering position to counter the steering moment associated with WED delta position; and (3) adjust the engine steering angle to counter yaw moments produced by gyroscopic stabilization systems. As disclosed herein, a total pitch axis control strategy includes symmetric deployment of a plurality of water engagement devices at a deployment speed of 100 mm/s or more while simultaneously adjusting an engine trim actuator. Similarly, a total roll and heading control strategy includes a differential deployment of the plurality of water engagement devices at a deployment speed of at 100 mm/s or more to counter a measured rolling motion while simultaneously adjusting a steering actuator to counter a measured yaw motion resulting from the differential deployment and adjusting the steering actuator to counter the measured yaw motion generated by a gyroscopic stabilization device adapted to be installed within the marine vessel.
In another embodiment, the DACS provides for automatically adjusting the engine steering angle to counter drag moment from a water engagement device delta position. The DACS comprises an embedded microprocessor based software module located within an operational console—the software module communicatively and operatively connected to the engine (via the engine control module) of the marine vessel. In software module can be configured to connect with third-party systems—e.g., navigational system—to connect and exchange data and information. At least one water engagement device actuator digitally connected to the software module—the water engagement device configured to read a signal input from the software module and automatically generate water engagement device delta position changes to counter the roll motion resulting from a steering position change.
As further explained in detailed below, the DACS comprises an engine having an embedded engine control module communicatively and operatively connected to the software module. A plurality of water engagement device actuators adapted to be mounted on a transom of the marine vessel and communicatively and operatively connected to the software module. During operation of the marine vessel, the software module is further configured to send a signal in order to command a desired water engagement device delta position and combat dynamic motions of the marine vessel. In addition, the software module is further configured to measure the relationship between an engine steering angle and the water engagement device delta position and provide a signal output to the water engagement device actuator. Specifically, the software module provides a first signal output to the plurality of water engagement device actuators to command a water engagement device delta position in order to combat dynamic motions of the marine vessel. Further, the software module measures a relationship between an engine steering angle and the water engagement device delta position and, in response thereto, provides a second signal output to the plurality of water engagement device actuators. On receiving the second signal the plurality of water engagement device actuators, in response thereto, automatically generate a change in the water engagement device delta position to counter a roll motion resulting from a steering position change.
The software module is embedded with a microprocessor-based control system, the software module is further communicatively and operatively connected to a plurality of sensors. In another embodiment, the plurality of sensors can be integrated (embedded) within the software module. A gyroscopic stabilization device adapted to be disposed on the marine vessel and communicatively and operatively connected to the software module is further provided within the system. During operation of the marine vessel, the control system measures motion of the marine vessel by the inertial sensor and provides a signal output to a steering actuator to adjust a steering position automatically (a) in response to a yaw axis motion measured by the inertial sensor, and (b) based on an empirical estimate of a yaw torque generated by the gyroscopic stabilization device and a water engagement device delta position commanded by the control system, respectively, in order to counter a measured change of an output from the steering position sensor.
The software module is further connected to a distribution module—the distribution module configured as a pass through module/device for wiring installation and providing a connection and distribution point for the various components of the DACS. The software module is further communicatively coupled to (1) a plurality of sensors (e.g., motion sensors positioned within the marine vessel); (2) a pair of actuators mounted adjacent the transom to deploy and retract the WEDs; and (3) an engine (or a propulsion unit) having an embedded engine-control unit (ECU) for providing adjustable trim, height and/or steering position/direction control; and/or (4) a gyroscopic stabilization device. The plurality of sensors comprises of at least one of the following: multi-axis inertial sensor for measuring rates or acceleration generated along multiple vector axes during the operation of the marine vessel; accelerometer sensor for measuring the longitudinal acceleration, lateral acceleration and vertical acceleration of the marine vessel respectively; Roll Rate Sensor (RRS), Pitch Rate Sensor (PRS) and Yaw Rate Sensor (YRS) to measure the roll rate, pitch rate and yaw rate of the marine vessel respectively. Further, at least one sensor, from the plurality of sensors is configured to measure data related to the WEDs/Controller retraction and deployment and measure and report data on steering angle, trim position, height of the engine during the vessel operation.
The software module may be further configured with proprietary machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm for automatic optimization of the vessel operating characteristics and to predict motion and respond instantaneously to eliminate any undesirable vessel movements that are annoying, disruptive and uncomfortable for the operators or passengers of the vessel before they are felt by an operator. The artificial intelligence-based system is configured to learn how the boat is behaving in all three axes and automatically command deployment of the WEDs and/or adjustment of the engine trim, height and/or steering to counteract the pitch, roll, and/or yaw of the vessel for a perceived stable and controlled operation. Further, the AI-based system disclosed herein can make any necessary adjustment to the engine steering position to control the heading of the marine vessel.
During operation of the marine vessel, the software module may receive a signal (about the WED delta position), make a decision on what action is needed and then send a signal to the actuator to take that action—for example, counter the rolling motions and simultaneously adjust engine steering position to counter the steering moment associated with WED delta position. As disclosed herein, the system via the plurality of sensors located throughout the marine vessel (integrated or communicatively and operatively coupled to the software module) is capable of receiving the steering position from the engine via a digital communications bus and calculating the change of steering position across a certain timeline, relating the change in steering/rudder position to a change in roll angle and automatically adjusting the WED delta position as a result of this predicted change in roll angle.
In addition to the software module, the operational console comprises an optional multifunctional display unit and/or an operation input device (e.g., keypad)—the components communicatively and operatively connected to each other via digital communication buses. In another embodiment, the operational console functions as a control station for the operator of the marine vessel and can support a steering wheel, control lever or other similar devices or steering mechanism—other types of wheel, joystick, to maneuver the marine vessel. The software module communicatively coupled to the WEDs (or controllers) is further configured to a provide power, communications and/or data to the ECU, and the actuators for fast deployment of the WEDs.
In another embodiment, the DACS comprises an actuator having at least one WED/Controller mounted on the transom of the marine vessel and digitally connected to the software module. The system is capable of determining a desired WED delta position to combat dynamic motions of the marine vessel by measuring the relationship between an engine steering angle and the WED delta position, and monitoring and reading any data related to the WED delta position as an impending change in yaw rate, heading and roll angle of the marine vessel. Specifically, the system can (A) make the necessary adjustment to the engine steering angle to in order control the heading of the marine vessel and counter the resulting heading change from WED delta position; and (B) measure a change in steering position and predict the resulting roll motion generated from the steering position change, and automatically create WED/Controller delta position to counter the roll motion that will ultimately result from the steering position change.
As further described in the detailed disclosure, the DACS may be configured to provide total vessel yaw axis control to combat dynamic motions of the marine vessel in the yaw axis by monitoring measured yaw rates and differentially deploying the WEDs while simultaneously adjusting such deployment in response to a measured yaw rate to reduce the measured yaw rate. The system herein receives an operator command—a desired trim angle—and can (A) adjust the average positions of the WEDs as well as the engine trim angle in an effort to achieve the operator's desired trim angle; and (B) adjust the relationship between engine trim and WED average position to optimize either the performance of the DACS system or fuel efficiency of the engine of the marine vessel.
The DACS may be configured to monitor and read any data related to the differential deployment of the WEDs as an impending change in the yaw rate, heading and roll rate of the marine vessel. Based on the data received, the system can provide total roll axis and heading control by differentially deploying WEDs to counter roll axis moments while simultaneously adjusting engine steering position to counter the steering moment associated with differential controller deployment. The DACS may also be configured to adjust the engine steering angle to counter yaw moments produced by gyroscopic stabilization systems.
Certain embodiments are shown in the drawings. However, it is understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the attached drawings.
The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification illustrate several aspects of the present disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the embodiments. In the drawings:
For the purposes of promoting and understanding the principles disclosed herein, reference is now made to the preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language is used to describe the same.
As illustrated in
Referring back to
The software module 202—communicatively coupled to the engine control module 302 of the engine of the marine vessel 2000—is further configured to a provide power, communications and/or data to the actuators for fast deployment of the WEDs 602, 606. Further, as illustrated in
As illustrated in the DACS 1000 disclosed herein, the distribution module 400 is mounted and located in proximity to the transom of the marine vessel 2000 wherein the operational console 200 (including the software module 202) are mounted near the helm and not in proximity to the transom of the marine vessel 2000. The various modules are communicatively coupled to each other—specifically the engine control module 302, the software module 202, and the actuators for the WEDs (602, 606)—via industry standard power and communication cables, The WED actuator mounted on the transom of the marine vessel—the WED actuator configured to provide fast deployment of the WEDs in 100 mm/s or more (mm/s)—preferably faster than 250 mm/s. During operation of the marine vessel 2000, the system 1000 is further designed to generate signals—for example, a wake signal—for the software module 202 to communicate a “power on” (wake up) status to the various components of the system—namely, the engine-control module 302 and other components (displays, input devices etc.) of the operational console 200 and the actuators for fast deployment of the WEDs/Controllers 602, 606.
Referring back to
The software module 202 further comprises a plurality of multi-axis inertial sensors for measuring rates or acceleration generated along multiple vector axes during the operation of the marine vessel 2000. The software module 202 is configured to be communicatively and operatively connected to the plurality of multi-axis inertial sensors—including, for example, the accelerometer sensors for measuring accelerations along the x, y and z axes (longitudinal acceleration, lateral acceleration and vertical acceleration), sensors to measure the roll rate, pitch rate and yaw rate—Roll Rate Sensor (RRS), Pitch Rate Sensor (PRS) and Yaw Rate Sensor (YRS), respectively. Embodiments that may become obvious to those skilled in the art include 6-axis, 9-axis or magnetometer sensors or other similar sensors for various measurements—e.g., rates, accelerations, forces, torques etc.—generated during the dynamic active control of the vessel. The software module 202 communicatively connected to the WEDs 602, 606 can be programmed to act (make certain iterative decisions) based on information received from an attitude sensor (e.g., pitch and roll) as well as from a global positioning system (GPS) sensor located at a pre-selected fixed position on the marine vessel 2000.
Referring back to
As illustrated in
In another aspect of the present disclosure, during operation of the marine vessel 2000, the system 1000 continuously monitors and measures data/feedback from the sensors and send command signals to instruct the actuator systems for fast deployment of WEDs 602, 606 to counteract certain dynamic active motions of the marine vessel (e.g., motions in the 0-3 Hz frequency spectrum across the roll, yaw and pitch axes) and provide the required dynamic active control of the marine vessel.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, DACS 1000 as disclosed herein is configured to make the necessary adjustment to the engine steering angle to control the heading of the marine vessel 2000 and counter the resulting heading change resulting from WED delta position. The DACS 1000 can measure a change in steering position and predict the resulting roll motion generated from the steering position change while automatically generating WED delta position to counter the roll motion that will ultimately result from this steering position change.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the DACS 1000 is configured to adjust the vessel 2000 trim angle by symmetric deployment (shown in
In yet another aspect of the present disclosure, the DACS disclosed herein provides for at least two optimization strategies by allowing the DACS to be controlled by the WED average position as well as by the engine trim. The DACS is configured to receive a desired trim angle from the operator and adjust the average positions of the WEDs as well as the engine trim angle in an effort to achieve the operator's desired trim angle. As disclosed herein, the DACS is configured to adjust the relationship between engine trim and WED average position, and optimize either the performance of the DACS system or fuel efficiency of the engine.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, during operation as the marine vessel 2000 moves through the water the system 1000 is configured to adjust the engine steering position to counter the yaw moment (by measuring the changing drag force) associated with the WEDs 602, 606 delta deployment. The software module 202 can provide a signal to the engine control module 302 of the engine for adjusting the steering position of the engine.
Referring back to
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the software module 202 is can receive and process data on the steering position of the engine of the marine vessel 2000. Specifically, the processor is programmed to measure the relationship between the steering position of the engine and the WED 602, 606 delta position. Based on the measured data, the software module 202 can generate and send predictive signals to the actuator to adjust the WEDs 602, 606 by differentially deploying each of the WEDs 602, 606 to counter rolling motions and simultaneously adjust the engine steering position to counter the steering moment associated with the WED delta position, as shown in
In another aspect of the present disclosure, the DACS 1000 provides the operator with the option to control and change (if necessary) the commanded roll angle of the marine vessel 2000. During operation of the marine vessel 2000, if waves hit a boat on the starboard side the operator has the option to dynamically change the commanded roll angle and/or instruct the operator via the user interfaces of to tilt the boat down to the port side.
The processing and computing of the data—specifically the processing of signal by the software module 202 to change the deployment angles of the WEDs/Controllers 602, 606 based on the difference between the commanded and the actual (measured) roll angle, is one of the key innovative features of the improved DACS. An operator can change the commanded roll angle (e.g., −5 to 5 degrees) which triggers the decision loop within the control system and generates the output signal to instruct the actuator system for fast (at 100 mm/s or more) delta deployment of the WEDs 602, 606.
It is understood that the preceding is merely a detailed description of some examples and embodiments of the present disclosure, and that numerous changes to the disclosed embodiments may be made in accordance with the disclosure made herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. The preceding description, therefore, is not meant to limit the scope of the disclosure, but to provide sufficient disclosure to allow one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the disclosure without undue burden. It is further understood that the scope of the present disclosure fully encompasses other embodiments that may become obvious to those skilled in the art.
Differential and differentially are defined within this document as unequal, off center and/or involving differences in: angle, speed, rate, direction, direction of motion, output, force, moment, inertia, mass, balance, application of comparable things, etc. The terms Dynamic and/or Dynamic Active Control may mean the immediate action that takes place at the moment they are needed. Any use of the term immediate, in this application, means that the control action occurs in a manner that is responsive to the extent that it prevents or mitigates vessel motions and attitudes before they would otherwise occur in the uncontrolled situation. A person of ordinary skilled in the art understands the relationship between sensed motion parameters and required response in terms of the maximum overall delay that can exist while still achieving the control objectives. Dynamic and/or Dynamic Active Control may be used in describing interactive hardware and software systems involving differing forces and may be characterized by continuous change and/or activity. Dynamic may also be used when describing the interaction between a vessel and the environment. As stated above, marine vessels may be subject to various dynamic forces generated by its propulsion system as well as the environment in which it operates. Any reference to vessel attitude may be defined as relative to three rotational axes including pitch attitude or rotation about the Y, transverse or sway axis, roll attitude or rotation about the X, longitudinal or surge axis, and yaw attitude or rotation about the Z, vertical or heave axis.
Various features of the example embodiments described herein may be implemented using hardware, software, or a combination thereof and may be implemented in one or more computer systems or other processing systems. However, the manipulations performed in these embodiments were often referred to in terms, such as determining, which are commonly associated with mental operations performed by a human operator. No such capability of a human operator is necessary in any of the operations described herein. Rather, the operations may be completely implemented with machine operations. Useful machines for performing the operation of the exemplary embodiments presented herein include general purpose digital computers or similar devices. With respect to hardware, a CPU typically includes one or more components, such as one or more microprocessors for performing the arithmetic and/or logical operations required for program execution, and storage media, such as one or more disk drives or memory cards (e.g., flash memory) for program and data storage, and a random access memory for temporary data and program instruction storage. With respect to software, a CPU typically includes software resident on a storage media (e.g., a disk drive or memory card), which, when executed, directs the CPU in performing transmission and reception functions.
The CPU software may run on an operating system stored on the storage media, such as, for example, UNIX or Windows (e.g., NT, XP, Vista), Linux, and the like, and can adhere to various protocols such as the Ethernet, ATM, TCP/IP, CAN, LIN protocols and/or other connection or connectionless protocols. As is known in the art, CPUs can run different operating systems, and can contain different types of software, each type devoted to a different function, such as handling and managing data/information from a particular source, or transforming data/information from one format into another format. It should thus be clear that the embodiments described herein are not to be construed as being limited for use with any particular type of server computer, and that any other suitable type of device for facilitating the exchange and storage of information may be employed instead.
A CPU may be a single CPU, or may include multiple separate CPUs, wherein each is dedicated to a separate application, such as, for example, a data application, a voice application, and a video application. Software embodiments of the example embodiments presented herein may be provided as a computer program product, or software, that may include an article of manufacture on a machine-accessible or non-transitory computer-readable medium (i.e., also referred to as “machine readable medium”) having instructions. The instructions on the machine-accessible or machine-readable medium may be used to program a computer system or other electronic device. The machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magneto-optical disks, USB thumb drives, and SD cards or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing or transmitting electronic instructions. The techniques described herein are not limited to any particular software configuration. They may find applicability in any computing or processing environment. The terms “machine-accessible medium,” “machine-readable medium,” and “computer-readable medium” used herein shall include any non-transitory medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or transmitting a sequence of instructions for execution by the machine (e.g., a CPU or other type of processing device) and that cause the machine to perform any one of the methods described herein. It is to be noted that it is common—as a person skilled in the art can contemplate—in the art to speak of software, in one form or another (e.g., program, procedure, process, application, module, unit, logic, and so on) as taking an action or causing a result. Such expressions are merely a shorthand way of stating that the execution of the software by a processing system causes the processor to perform an action to produce a result.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) is to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. It is understood that the preceding is merely a detailed description of some examples and embodiments of the present disclosure, and that numerous changes to the disclosed embodiments may be made in accordance with the disclosure made herein without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. The preceding description, therefore, is not meant to limit the scope of the disclosure, but to provide sufficient disclosure to allow one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the disclosure without undue burden.
It is further understood that the scope of the present disclosure fully encompasses other embodiments that may become obvious to those skilled in the art. Features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used in another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present disclosure cover such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents. It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present discussion is a description of exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present disclosure, which broader aspects are embodied in the exemplary constructions.
This Application claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/225,291, filed Jul. 23, 2021, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4524942 | Kueny | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4749926 | Ontolchik | Jun 1988 | A |
| 5142497 | Warrow | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5263432 | Davis | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5385110 | Bennett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| D362841 | Roza | Oct 1995 | S |
| 5474012 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 6041730 | Oliverio et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6268053 | Woiszwillo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6273771 | Buckley et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6354237 | Gaynor et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6417469 | Tamura | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6579072 | Trousil et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6592412 | Geil et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6651574 | Ellens et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6659816 | Fuse | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6766962 | Paul et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6874441 | Pigeon | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| D507543 | Ishii et al. | Jul 2005 | S |
| 6928948 | Shannon | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7025026 | Young et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7040937 | Scott et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7059347 | Schwartzman | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7128014 | Berthiaume et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128626 | Dundra et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7128627 | Ferguson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7137347 | Wong et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7140315 | Okuyama | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7156708 | Dudra | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171982 | Dudra | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7258072 | Wong et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7278367 | Gonring et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7285738 | Lavigne et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7311058 | Brooks et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7318386 | Dudra et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| D562753 | Wall et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
| D562754 | Wall et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
| 7364482 | Wong et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7407420 | Fetchko et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
| 7479607 | Sack et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7497183 | Dudra et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7597552 | Young et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7601040 | Morvillo | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7631610 | Wolske | Dec 2009 | B1 |
| 7641525 | Morvillo | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7717462 | Liu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7722418 | Ellens et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7743721 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7806142 | Baros et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7905156 | Scott et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7958837 | Fraleigh | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7975638 | Harris et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 8007330 | Wong et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8025006 | Baros | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8028510 | Scott et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8042480 | Simons | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8062010 | Paramonoff et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| D654880 | Iam | Feb 2012 | S |
| 8113892 | Gable et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
| 8141789 | Schwartzman et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8145371 | Rae et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8151723 | Winiski et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8170734 | Kaji | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8182396 | Martin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8261682 | DeVito | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8264338 | Leon | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8347859 | Garon et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8387589 | Wong et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8406944 | Garon et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8435088 | Morettin et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8425270 | Dudra et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8430702 | Davidson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8457820 | Gonring | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8516916 | Scott et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8550023 | Quail | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8578838 | Davidson | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8578873 | Gasper et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8583300 | Oehlgrien et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8610013 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8612072 | Garon et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| D698304 | Dubois et al. | Jan 2014 | S |
| D698357 | Mainville et al. | Jan 2014 | S |
| 8626962 | Wong et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8631753 | Morvillo | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8672086 | Wong et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8683300 | Stek et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8751015 | Frewin et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8769944 | Redfern | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8845490 | Chan et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| D720305 | Wenji | Dec 2014 | S |
| 8901443 | Baker et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8930050 | Garon et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8931707 | Wilnechenko et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8957338 | Li | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| D725050 | Tsugawa et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
| D725612 | Schlegel et al. | Mar 2015 | S |
| 8992273 | Winiski et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| D727190 | Higgs | Apr 2015 | S |
| 8997628 | Sall et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9032898 | Widmark | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9068855 | Guglielmo | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9104227 | Clarke et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9233740 | Morvillo | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9260161 | Gasper et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9278740 | Andrasko et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
| 9334022 | Gasper et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9340257 | Ulgen | May 2016 | B2 |
| D758325 | Cook et al. | Jun 2016 | S |
| D758975 | Hunter et al. | Jun 2016 | S |
| 9377780 | Arbuckle et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
| 9423894 | Olsson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9459787 | Kulczycki et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9522723 | Andrasko et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
| 9559649 | Noh et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| D782987 | Gassner | Apr 2017 | S |
| 9631753 | Wood et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9745020 | Snow | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9689395 | Hartman | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9710077 | Okazaki | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9834293 | Wood et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| D807309 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2018 | S |
| 9857794 | Jarrell et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
| 9896173 | Baros et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9911556 | Lee et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9944377 | Davidson et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9950771 | Hartman et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
| D818973 | Tang et al. | May 2018 | S |
| 9978540 | Tanaka et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9988126 | Wood | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 9994291 | Scott | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10000268 | Poirier et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
| 10040522 | Hartman et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
| 10112692 | Anschuetz | Oct 2018 | B1 |
| 10202179 | Wong et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10281928 | Behling et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10358189 | Sheedy et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10370070 | Fetchko et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10386834 | Green et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| D858465 | Desbiens | Sep 2019 | S |
| 10431099 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10457371 | Hara et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| D884856 | Jones et al. | May 2020 | S |
| 10647399 | Davidson et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10671073 | Arbuckle et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10683073 | Redfern et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10683074 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10696368 | Mizutani et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10696369 | Takase et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10766590 | Nanjo et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10781947 | Fetchko et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10829191 | Wong et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10889358 | Wong et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10906623 | Chan et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10940927 | Chan et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 11000268 | Poucher et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
| 11040757 | Huyge et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11155322 | Baros | Oct 2021 | B2 |
| 11319916 | Strang et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
| 11372411 | Derginer | Jun 2022 | B1 |
| 11433981 | Chan et al. | Sep 2022 | B2 |
| 11465726 | Nakatani | Oct 2022 | B2 |
| 11467583 | Mizutani | Oct 2022 | B2 |
| 11530022 | Andrasko | Dec 2022 | B1 |
| 11679853 | Wong et al. | Jun 2023 | B2 |
| 11685499 | Arbuckle | Jun 2023 | B1 |
| 11993357 | Ikegaya | May 2024 | B2 |
| 12017746 | Wong | Jun 2024 | B2 |
| 20030082964 | Simner | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20050233655 | Maselter | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20070006101 | Michaels | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238370 | Morvillo | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276563 | Kaji | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20090076671 | Mizutani | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165694 | Beamer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100094491 | Oehlgrien et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100102173 | Everett et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198435 | Cansiani et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110000268 | Schaafsma et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110120364 | Mueller | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110143608 | Chiecchi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151732 | Chiecchi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110320072 | Morvillo | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120103774 | Jun | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120247934 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130213293 | Gasper et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140043303 | Baker et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140183011 | Park et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140224166 | Morvillo | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140348207 | Wilnechenko et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140365050 | Morvillo | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20160097393 | Hartman | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20170250037 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170313386 | Snow | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170349257 | Hara et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180201342 | Huyge et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20200303235 | Miyadate et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200354030 | Bowie | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| 20200391838 | Inoue | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210107617 | Nakatani | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210141396 | Kinoshita | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210173413 | Derginer | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210291943 | Inoue | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20220004125 | Mitsumata et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
| 20220306257 | Afman | Sep 2022 | A1 |
| 20220334596 | Chan et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
| 20220355913 | Davidson et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
| 20230021635 | Gallagher | Jan 2023 | A1 |
| 20230030018 | Ross | Feb 2023 | A1 |
| 20230073225 | Chan et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
| 20230166823 | Wood et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
| 20230257096 | Wong et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
| 20230286634 | Koga | Sep 2023 | A1 |
| 20230303235 | Wong et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
| 20240116616 | Moruzzi | Apr 2024 | A1 |
| 20240132195 | Hamada | Apr 2024 | A1 |
| 20240132196 | Shirao | Apr 2024 | A1 |
| 20240182142 | Filippou | Jun 2024 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 783746 | Jan 2003 | AU |
| 279547 | Apr 1928 | CA |
| 304073 | Sep 1930 | CA |
| 2236483 | May 1998 | CA |
| 2372402 | Feb 2002 | CA |
| 3048271 | Jun 2019 | CA |
| 3048276 | Jun 2019 | CA |
| 3048282 | Dec 2020 | CA |
| 109110073 | Jan 2019 | CN |
| 112124548 | Dec 2020 | CN |
| 19837888 | Aug 1998 | DE |
| 0928739 | Jul 1999 | EP |
| H0350087 | Mar 1991 | JP |
| H0382697 | Apr 1991 | JP |
| H03114996 | May 1991 | JP |
| 106255577 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| H09286390 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| 109315384 | Dec 1997 | JP |
| 2001294197 | Oct 2001 | JP |
| 2002-284087 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003341589 | Dec 2003 | JP |
| 2004224103 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2005-280550 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2005324716 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2009037287 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 2012-035786 | Feb 2012 | JP |
| 2013035351 | Feb 2013 | JP |
| 2013100102 | May 2013 | JP |
| 2014196091 | Oct 2014 | JP |
| 2018030573 | Mar 2018 | JP |
| 10-2011-0078767 | Jul 2011 | KR |
| 10-2011-0139800 | Dec 2011 | KR |
| 10-2012-0019280 | Mar 2012 | KR |
| 10-1259134 | Apr 2013 | KR |
| 10-1297596 | Aug 2013 | KR |
| 10-2013-0119071 | Oct 2013 | KR |
| 10-1491661 | Feb 2015 | KR |
| 10-2017-0143039 | Dec 2017 | KR |
| 10-2275079 | Jul 2021 | KR |
| 2003068590 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 2006058232 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| 2008100903 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| 2009134153 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2010003905 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2011099931 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2011142870 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2016036616 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| 2016209401 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| 2023092228 | Jan 2023 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| US 11,198,496 B2, 12/2021, Wong et al. (withdrawn) |
| Volvo Penta; Boat Trim System; Mar. 2017; 4 pgs. |
| Australian Boat Magazine; The Intriguing Zipwake Trim; May 2015; 6 pgs. |
| Interceptors/Trim Tabs/Force Producers for Ship Motion Control—Maritime Dynamics, Inc. |
| Auto TrimPro Electric Owner Install Guide; 48 pgs. |
| Trygve Lauvdal and Thor I. Fossen; Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Engineering Cybernetics, n-7034 Trondheim, Norway; Nonlinear Non-Minimum Phase Rudder-Roll Damping System for Ships Using Sliding Mode Control; 6 pgs. |
| Asgei J. Sorenson; Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology ; 2013 Department of Marine Technology, Ntnu; Marine Control Systems, Propolsion and Motion Control of Ships and Ocean Sructures Lecture Notes; 536 pgs. |
| European Patent Office Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 26, 2022 from corresponding European Patent Application No. 19869718.7; 7 pages. |
| WIPO, Canadian International Searching Authority, International Search Report mailed Dec. 13, 2019 in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2019/051410, 3 pages. |
| WIPO, Canadian International Searching Authority, Written Opinion mailed Dec. 4, 2019 in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2019/051410, 6 pages. |
| LENCO—We Make The Best Boats Better!; The World Leader In Trim Tab Systems & Hatch Lift Innovation Owner's Manual; May 21, 2019; 28 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, filed in PCT/US2022/038962 dated Nov. 16, 2022; 7 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, filed in PCT/US2022/038102 dated Nov. 15, 2022; 9 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, filed in PCT/US2022/038964 dated Nov. 28, 2022; 8 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, filed in PCT/US2022/040944 dated Dec. 2, 2022; 7 pgs. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20230021635 A1 | Jan 2023 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63225291 | Jul 2021 | US |