The present invention is related to a method and an apparatus for dynamic well borehole annular pressure control, more specifically, a selectively closed-loop, pressurized method for controlling borehole pressure during drilling and well completion.
The exploration and production of hydrocarbons from subsurface formations ultimately requires a method to reach and extract the hydrocarbons from the formation. This is typically achieved by drilling a well with a drilling rig. In its simplest form, this constitutes a land-based drilling rig that is used to support and rotate a drill string, comprised of a series of drill tubulars with a drill bit mounted at the end. Furthermore, a pumping system is used to circulate a fluid, comprised of a base fluid, typically water or oil, and various additives down the drill string, the fluid then exits through the rotating drill bit and flows back to surface via the annular space formed between the borehole wall and the drill bit. The drilling fluid serves the following purposes: (a) Provide support to the borehole wall, (b) prevent formation fluids or gasses from entering the well, (c) transport the cuttings produced by the drill bit to surface, (d) provide hydraulic power to tools fixed in the drill string and (d) cooling of the bit. After being circulated through the well, the drilling fluid flows back into a mud handling system, generally comprised of a shaker table, to remove solids, a mud pit and a manual or automatic means for addition of various chemicals or additives to keep the properties of the returned fluid as required for the drilling operation. Once the fluid has been treated, it is circulated back into the well via re-injection into the top of the drill string with the pumping system.
During drilling operations, the fluid exerts a pressure against the wellbore wall that is mainly built-up of a hydrostatic part, related to the weight of the mud column, and a dynamic part related frictional pressure losses caused by, for instance, the fluid circulation rate or movement of the drill string. The total pressure (dynamic+static) that the fluid exerts on the wellbore wall is commonly expressed in terms of equivalent density, or “Equivalent Circulating Density” (or ECD). The fluid pressure in the well is selected such that, while the fluid is static or during drilling operations, it does not exceed the formation fracture pressure or formation strength. If the formation strength is exceeded, formation fractures will occur which will create drilling problems such as fluid losses and borehole instability. On the other hand, the fluid density is chosen such that the pressure in the well is always maintained above the pore pressure to avoid formation fluids entering the well (primary well control) The pressure margin with on one side the pore pressure and on the other side the formation strength is known as the “Operational Window”.
For reasons of safety and pressure control, a Blow-Out Preventer (BOP) can be mounted on the well head, below the rig floor, which BOP can shut off the wellbore in case unwanted formation fluids or gas should enter the wellbore (secondary well control). Such unwanted inflows are commonly referred to as “kicks”. The BOP will normally only be used in emergency i.e. well-control situations.
To overcome the problems of Over-Balanced, open fluid circulation systems, there have been developed a number of closed fluid handling systems. Examples of these include U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,952, to Bradfield et al. and assigned to Baker Hughes Incorporated. In this patent, a closed system is used for the purposes of underbalanced drilling, i.e., the annular pressure is maintained below the formation pore pressure.
Another method and system is described by H. L. Elkins in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,374,925 and 6,527,062. That invention traps pressure within the annulus by completely closing the annulus outlet when circulation is interrupted.
The current invention further builds on the invention described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,129 by Shell Oil Company, which is hereby incorporated by reference. In this patent a method and system are described to control the fluid pressure in a well bore during drilling, using a back pressure pump in fluid communication with an annulus discharge conduit, in addition to a primary pump for circulating drilling fluid through the annulus via the drill string.
According to the present invention there is provided a drilling system for drilling a bore hole into a subterranean earth formation, wherein one may readily control annular pressure. Whereas, U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,129 utilizes a backpressure pump to pump mud back into the discharge outlet, the present invention utilizes the primary mud pump and diverts at least a portion of the mud flow to the discharge outlet to increase annular pressure.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a three-way valve is utilized to completely divert the flow of mud from the primary mud pump to the discharge outlet.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a valve may be used to split the flow of mud from the mud pump to provide flow to both the discharge outlet and the drill string.
In yet another embodiment, flow is divided between the drill string and the discharge outlet, with each conduit having a variable flow control device in the fluid conduit.
Since according to the invention the pump is utilized for both supplying drilling fluid to the longitudinal fluid passage in the drill string and for exerting a back pressure in the fluid discharge conduit, a separate backpressure pump can be dispensed with.
The invention will be described hereinafter in more detail and by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
The present invention is intended to achieve Dynamic Annulus Pressure Control (DAPC) of a well bore during drilling, completion and intervention operations.
The drill string 112 supports a bottom hole assembly (BHA) 113 that includes a drill bit 120, a mud motor 118, a MWD/LWD sensor suite 119, including a pressure transducer 116 to determine the annular pressure, a check valve 118, to prevent backflow of fluid from the annulus. It also includes a telemetry package 122 that is used to transmit pressure, MWD/LWD as well as drilling information to be received at the surface.
As noted above, the drilling process requires the use of a drilling fluid 150, which is stored in reservoir 136. The reservoir 136 is in fluid communication with one or more mud pumps 138 which pump the drilling fluid 150 through conduit 140. An optional flow meter 152 can be provided in series with the one or more mud pumps, either upstream or downstream thereof. The conduit 140 is connected to the last joint of the drill string 112 that passes through a rotating control head on top of the BOP 142. The rotating control head on top of the BOP forms, when activated, a seal around the drill string 112, isolating the pressure, but still permitting drill string rotation and reciprocation. The fluid 150 is pumped down through the drill string 112 and the BHA 113 and exits the drill bit 120, where it circulates the cuttings away from the bit 120 and returns them up the open hole annulus 115 and then the annulus formed between the casing 108 and the drill string 112. The fluid 150 returns to the surface and goes through the side outlet below the seal of the rotating head on top of the BOP, through conduit 124 and optionally through various surge tanks and telemetry systems (not shown).
Thereafter the fluid 150 proceeds to what is generally referred to as the backpressure system 131, 132, 133. The fluid 150 enters the backpressure system 131, 132, 133, and flows through an optional flow meter 126. The flow meter 126 may be a mass-balance type or other high-resolution flow meter. Utilizing the flow meter 126 and 152, an operator will be able to determine how much fluid 150 has been pumped into the well through drill string 112 and the amount of fluid 150 returning from the well. Based on differences in the amount of fluid 150 pumped versus fluid 150 returned, the operator is able to determine whether fluid 150 is being lost to the formation 104, i.e., a significant negative fluid differential, which may indicate that formation fracturing has occurred. Likewise, a significant positive differential would be indicative of formation fluid or gas entering into the well bore (kick).
The fluid 150 proceeds to a wear resistant choke 130 provided in conduit 124. It will be appreciated that there exist chokes designed to operate in an environment where the drilling fluid 150 contains substantial drill cuttings and other solids. Choke 130 is one such type and is further capable of operating at variable pressures, flowrates and through multiple duty cycles.
Referring now to the embodiment of
Still referring to
In the embodiments of
A trip tank is normally used on a rig to monitor fluid gains and losses during tripping operations. In the present invention, this functionality is maintained.
Operation of valve 6 in the embodiment of
In operation, the mud pump 138 thus delivers a pressure for exceeding the drill string circulation pressure losses and annular circulation pressure losses, and for providing annulus back pressure. Pending on a set back-pressure, variable valve 6 is opened to allow mud flow into bypass conduit 7 for achieving the desired back pressure. Valve 6, or choke 130 if provided, or both, are adjusted to maintain the desired back pressure.
A three-way valve may be provided in the form as shown in
The ability to provide adjustable backpressure during the entire drilling and completing process is a significant improvement over conventional drilling systems.
It will be appreciated that it is necessary to shut off the drilling fluid circulation through the longitudinal fluid passage in drill string 112 and the annulus 115 from time to time during the drilling process, for instance to make up successive drill pipe joints. When the drilling fluid circulation is is shut off, the annular pressure will reduce to the hydrostatic pressure. Similarly, when the circulation is regained, the annular pressure increases. The cyclic loading of the borehole wall can cause fatigue.
The use of the invention permits an operator to continuously adjust the annular pressure by adjusting the backpressure at surface by means of adjusting choke 130, and/or valve 6 and/or first and second variable flow restrictive devices 9,10. In this manner, the downhole pressure can be varied in such a way that the downhole pressure remains essentially constant and within the operational window limited by the pore pressure and the fracture pressure. It will be appreciated that the difference between the thus maintained annular pressure and the pore pressure, known as the overbalance pressure, can be significantly less than the overbalance pressure seen using conventional methods.
In all of the embodiments of
Although the invention has been described with reference to a specific embodiment, it will be appreciated that modifications may be made to the system and method described herein without departing from the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP03/08644 | Aug 2003 | EP | regional |
The present application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/368,128, filed 18 Feb. 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,904,981 which application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional application 60/358,226 filed Feb. 20, 2002. In addition, under 35 USC § 120, the present continuation-in-part application claims priority of International application PCT/EP03/08644 filed on Aug. 1, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2169223 | Christian | Aug 1939 | A |
2628129 | Hosmer et al. | Feb 1953 | A |
2946565 | Williams | Jul 1960 | A |
3354970 | Lummus | Nov 1967 | A |
3365009 | Burnham et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3429387 | Brown | Feb 1969 | A |
3443643 | Jones | May 1969 | A |
3470971 | Dower | Oct 1969 | A |
3488765 | Anderson | Jan 1970 | A |
3497020 | Kammerer, Jr. | Feb 1970 | A |
3508577 | Vincent et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3552502 | Wilson, Sr. | Jan 1971 | A |
3559739 | Hutchison | Feb 1971 | A |
3677353 | Baker | Jul 1972 | A |
3827511 | Jones | Aug 1974 | A |
3868832 | Biffle | Mar 1975 | A |
4315553 | Stallings | Feb 1982 | A |
4406595 | Robertson et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4630675 | Neipling et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4630691 | Hooper | Dec 1986 | A |
4653597 | Johnson | Mar 1987 | A |
4683944 | Curlett | Aug 1987 | A |
4700739 | Flohr | Oct 1987 | A |
4709900 | Dyhr | Dec 1987 | A |
4755111 | Cocchi et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4924949 | Curlett | May 1990 | A |
5010966 | Stokley et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5048620 | Maher | Sep 1991 | A |
5168932 | Worrall et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5305836 | Holbrook et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5348107 | Bailey et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5437308 | Morin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443128 | Amaudric du Chaffaut | Aug 1995 | A |
5447197 | Rae et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5474142 | Bowden | Dec 1995 | A |
5547506 | Rae et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5638904 | Misselbrook et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5806612 | Vorhoff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5857522 | Bradfield et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890549 | Sprehe | Apr 1999 | A |
5975219 | Sprehe | Nov 1999 | A |
6033192 | Wood | Mar 2000 | A |
6035952 | Bradfield et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6102673 | Mott et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119772 | Pruet | Sep 2000 | A |
6176323 | Weirich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189612 | Ward | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6325159 | Peterman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352129 | Best | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367566 | Hill | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374925 | Elkins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394195 | Schubert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6412554 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6484816 | Koederitz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6571873 | Maus | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575244 | Chang et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
20010050185 | Calder et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020108783 | Elkins et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112888 | Leuchtenberg | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030098181 | Aronstam et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030181338 | Sweatman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040069504 | Krueger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19813087 | Sep 1999 | DE |
436242 | Apr 1994 | EP |
947750 | Oct 1998 | EP |
2323870 | Oct 1998 | GB |
9816716 | Oct 1997 | WO |
9934090 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0004269 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0075477 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0079092 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0120120 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0250398 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02084067 | Oct 2002 | WO |
03025334 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03071091 | Aug 2003 | WO |
04005667 | Jan 2004 | WO |
04074627 | Sep 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040178003 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60358226 | Feb 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10368128 | Feb 2003 | US |
Child | 10775425 | US |