The present invention relates to wireless digital communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to communication stations which employ code-division multiple access (CDMA) technology. Specifically, the present invention relates to determining radio conditions for use in optimizing radio resource utilization as well as selecting data rates for user services.
In code-division multiple access (CDMA) third generation (3G) cellular telecommunication systems, adaptive modulation and coding (AM&C) techniques are applied to transmissions in order to achieve improved radio resource utilization and provide increased data rates for user services under appropriate conditions. These AM&C techniques take into account radio conditions in advance of transmissions in order to determine modulation and coding rates that take the greatest advantage of current radio propagation conditions utilizing these techniques.
Utilizing these AM&C techniques, a procedure is required that provides a physical channel quality measurement from the receiver in advance of each transmission. Based on this quality measurement, the transmitter determines the appropriate modulation and coding rate for the particular transmission.
In CDMA systems, as with any wireless systems, radio conditions can change rapidly due to a wide variety of both natural and man-made conditions. Since the channel quality measurement is used to determine transmission modulation and coding, and since channel quality changes rapidly due to the changing conditions of the transmission path, the performance of the adaptive transmission process is directly related to the length of the time period between when the channel quality measurement is performed and when the transmission is initiated.
Physical or logical control channels are then used to transfer the channel quality measurements from the receiver to the transmitter. Channel quality signaling may utilize either dedicated control channels to each user equipment (UE) or common control channels shared by all UEs. A UE may be a cellular phone, PDA (personal data assistant) or any other type of wireless device. When dedicated control channels are used, a continuous signaling channel is available over time for propagation of channel quality measurements for each UE. This is an optimal solution for AM&C since the quality measurement is continuously available. Transmissions can occur at any time, taking into account the continuously available quality measurement for appropriate modulation and coding settings. Additionally, with a dedicated control channel always available in the uplink, the channel can be also used to support low rate uplink data transmissions.
The difficulty with the dedicated control channel approach is that physical resources are continuously allocated even when there is no data to transmit. A primary application of AM&C techniques is non-real time high data rate services, for example, Internet access. For these classes of service, the best quality of service (QoS) is achieved with short, high rate transmissions with relatively long idle periods between each transmission. These long idle periods result in an inefficient use of dedicated resources.
The problem can be minimized with pre-configured periodic dedicated channel allocations. But this results in periodic availability of quality measurements. If the quality measurements are not continuously available, for UEs which have transmissions at anyone point in time, only some portion of the UEs will have recent channel quality measurements.
Another alternative is the use of common control channels. With common control channels, a continuous signaling channel exists that is shared between all UEs within the cell. Procedures are defined for determining each UEs access to the common control channel. UE identities are used to distinguish UE specific transactions.
The difficulty with the common control approach for support of AM&C is the large amount of signaling overhead necessary to administrate each UE's access to the control channel. As aforementioned, UE identities are required to distinguish UE specific transactions. Additionally, to avoid contention-based access to the uplink common control channel, individual allocations are required to be signaled on the downlink common control channel for each UE's access. Since uplink transmissions cannot always be predicted, periodic allocations of the uplink control channel must be signaled on the downlink common control channel, which results in considerable signaling overhead. Also, the common control approach does not provide for low rate, uplink data transmissions.
In summary, the efficient performance of AM&C techniques is primarily based on the availability of recent physical channel quality measurements from the receiver in advance of each transmission. Optimally, measurements are available with minimal latency for all users with active data transmissions. The dedicated control channel solution provides continuous measurements, but since transmissions are discontinuous, this is an inefficient use of radio resources. Periodic configured dedicated control channels minimize the radio resource requirement, but this increases measurement latency. The common control channel method can provide measurements on a continuous or periodic basis, but the signaling overhead results in an inefficient use of radio resources.
There exists a need for a system that provides channel quality measurements with low latency and low signaling overhead.
The objectives of the present invention will become apparent upon consideration of the accompanying detailed description and figures, in which:
Presently preferred embodiments are described below with reference to the drawing figures wherein like numerals represent like elements throughout.
Blocks of downlink (DL) data are transferred to the base station 12 which are designated for a particular UE 30 (step S1).
The base station 12, responsive to receipt of downlink data and in advance of a transmission to the UE 30, requests DL CQ measurements only from a UE 30 having pending downlink transmissions (step S2).
The UE 30 receives the request and makes the requested CQ measurement at step S3 and reports the DL CQ measurement to the base station 12 at step S4.
Based on the CQ measurement reports received from each UE (step S5), the base station 12 determines which of the UEs will make the best use of radio resources, and determines which slots to use (step S6). Preferably, the UEs are prioritized by their CQ so that the UE with the highest CQ is sent its data first and then the UE with the second highest CQ is sent its data second, and so on until the UE with the lowest CQ is sent its data last.
Since the CQ measurement requests and the responsive CQ measurement reports are only generated when needed, the signaling overhead required for a common control channel is greatly reduced. Measurement reports are available for all active transmitting users, similar to the dedicated control channel case, but avoiding the resource inefficiency during idle periods.
The priority of transmissions is determined according to the DL CQ measurements, and the DL physical channel allocation is signaled to the appropriate UEs, indicating the particular coding rate, modulation type and allocated slots (step S7). The designated UE receives the coding rate, modulation type and allocated slots (step S8), and sets these parameters for reception (step S9).
Blocks of downlink data are then transmitted by the base station 12 to the designated UE 30 (step S10) a given, but short, time after performance of step S7 to enable the UE 30 time to set up for reception. The UE 30 receives the downlink data (step S11) at the specified coding rate, modulation type and in the allocated slots specified at step S7.
The present invention thus provides the fundamental requirements for AM&C operation while maintaining the most efficient use of radio resources. Since DL CQ measurements are available with the minimum possible latency for all transmissions, the choice of the best user(s) to provide service in the next transmission time frame is optimized. Additionally, measurements provided by periodic or continuous mechanisms do not provide increased benefit, performance gain or enhancement over the present invention.
Implementation of the present invention also minimizes measurement processing and the associated power consumption, especially important in the UE, which is typically powered by a small power source of limited capacity, (i.e. a chargeable battery). Since a quality measurement is only requested for a particular active transmission, the number of required measurements are minimized.
In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the method 70 of the present invention shown in
The present invention provides many advantages over prior art schemes. First, the invention provides the highest efficiency utilization of the air interface since only those UEs having pending transmissions will be required to respond to a request for DL CQ measurements. This permits the overhead signaling to be at a minimum.
Second, since the transmissions are prioritized according to the highest quality DL CQ measurements, the highest data rates permissible will be achieved for each time slot or multiple time slots.
Third, since UEs are only required to respond to the request for the DL CQ measurements, unnecessary measurements by the UEs will not be required, thereby saving the battery life of the UEs.
A final advantage of the present invention is the increased number of users that may be supported in a cell for both of the methods disclosed herein. The number of users that are supported is limited in the dedicated control channel method by the requirement for dedicated radio resources; and in the common control channel method by signaling overhead requirements. By limiting the measurement signaling procedures to active users, the present invention minimizes the common control signaling overhead and supports the greatest number of users in the cell.
While the present invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiment, other variations which are within the scope of the invention as outlined in the claims below will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
This United States non-provisional continuation utility patent application is related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Mar. 1, 2013, having an application Ser. No. 13/782,664, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Jun. 27, 2012, having an application Ser. No. 13/534,561, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Mar. 7, 2011, having an application Ser. No. 13/042,134, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Dec. 29, 2009, having an application Ser. No. 12/648,470, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MINIMIZING OVERHEAD SIGNALING AND OPTIMIZING RADIO RESOURCE UTILIZATION,” filed Jan. 23, 2007, having an application Ser. No. 11/656,647, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Jan. 30, 2004, having an application Ser. No. 10/768,312, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE FOR ADAPTIVE MODULATION AND CODING TECHNIQUES,” filed Dec. 21, 2001, having an application Ser. No. 10/029,569, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the provisional utility application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE FOR ADAPTIVE MODULATION AND CODING TECHNIQUES,” filed May 14, 2001, having an application Ser. No. 60/290,877, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5375123 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5701294 | Ward | Dec 1997 | A |
5764648 | Yamane et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778316 | Persson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5828672 | Labonte et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5862451 | Grau et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867478 | Baum et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5940439 | Kleider et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949790 | Pehkonen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956642 | Larsson | Sep 1999 | A |
5960335 | Umemoto | Sep 1999 | A |
5991627 | Honkasalo | Nov 1999 | A |
6101179 | Soliman | Aug 2000 | A |
6115406 | Mesecher | Sep 2000 | A |
6137991 | Isaksson | Oct 2000 | A |
6144653 | Persson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167031 | Olofsson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6208663 | Schramm et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6298035 | Heiskala | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301265 | Kleider et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307867 | Roobol et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330288 | Budka et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347071 | Cupo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366601 | Ghosh et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373877 | Mesecher | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374118 | Toskala et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6498936 | Raith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6545997 | Bohnke et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584092 | Sudo | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587697 | Terry et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597697 | Petersen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615054 | Terry et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6650624 | Quigley et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6700881 | Kong et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721569 | Hashem et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6745045 | Terry et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760598 | Kurjenniemi | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6791960 | Song | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801513 | Gibbons et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6810236 | Terry et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6850540 | Peisa | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868277 | Cerwall | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6909901 | Terry et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6928065 | Logalbo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934340 | Dollard | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947490 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952591 | Budka et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6958989 | Dick et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6963540 | Choi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987746 | Song | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7035234 | Toskala et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7089015 | Fukui | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116653 | Bemmer et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127256 | Terry et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7171163 | Terry et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7209711 | Terry et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7227854 | Kim et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236474 | Seo et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7274947 | Koo et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7639989 | Terry et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7904026 | Terry et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8219036 | Terry et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020110101 | Gopalakrishnan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030123414 | Tong et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1277764 | Dec 2000 | CN |
0717580 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0755133 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0899906 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0944201 | Sep 1999 | EP |
08-149132 | Jun 1996 | JP |
2000-151639 | May 2000 | JP |
2001-515306 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-527938 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-538697 | Nov 2002 | JP |
WO-9722218 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO-0021235 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-00-21235 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0051390 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO-0072496 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0076114 | Dec 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,561 mailed Sep. 13, 2012, 18 pages. |
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200910001226.2 mailed Oct. 12, 2012, 6 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Apr. 30, 2013, 3 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Sep. 2, 2011, 7 pages. |
“History of Study '90-'99,” NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation), Apr. 30, 2001, pp. 68-69. |
Final Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Feb. 4, 2011, 19 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2012-000113 mailed Mar. 19, 2013, 3 pages. |
Office Action from Taiwanese Application No. 099121594 mailed Mar. 28, 2013, 4 pages. |
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200910001226.2 mailed Aug. 6, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action from European Application No. 10181279.0 mailed Sep. 4, 2013, 4 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2012-000113 mailed Aug. 27, 2013, 4 pages. |
Office Action from Norwegian Application No. 20101711 mailed Sep. 21, 2013, 3 pages. |
Rejection on Appeal from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Oct. 2, 2013, 3 pages. |
Office Action from Taiwan Application No. 100142409 mailed Mar. 14, 2014, 5 pages. |
Office Action from Norwegian Application No. 20101711 mailed Mar. 25, 2014, 2 pages. |
Office Action from Norwegian Application No. 20101711 mailed Oct. 20, 2012, 3 pages. |
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), RRC Protocol Specification, 3GPP TS 25.331 version 4.0.0 Release 4, Apr. 6, 2001, 38 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,561 mailed Jan. 7, 2013, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Apr. 19, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed May 24, 2011, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Sep. 14, 2011, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Jan. 31, 2012, 4 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Jun. 1, 2012, 8 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,211 mailed Sep. 28, 2004, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,211 mailed Jun. 15, 2005, 6 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,223 mailed May 23, 2006, 6 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,223 mailed Oct. 3, 2005, 13 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,223 mailed Mar. 13, 2006, 15 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,312 mailed Jun. 23, 2006, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,312 mailed Sep. 25, 2006, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,313 mailed Nov. 16, 2006, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,313 mailed Aug. 9, 2006, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Aug. 12, 2009, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Apr. 3, 2009, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Jul. 25, 2008, 15 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Nov. 13, 2007, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,470 mailed Oct. 20, 2010, 7 pages. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,470 mailed Jun. 11, 2010, 10 pages. |
Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,664, 71 pages. |
First Official Action dated Sep. 2, 2014 (+ English translation), in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-269312, 4 pages. |
Extended European Search Report from EP14192732.7 mailed Feb. 27, 2015, 7 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,664 dated Mar. 12, 2015, 25 pages. |
Second Official Action dated Mar. 31, 2015 (+ English translation), in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-269312, 4 pages. |
Search Report for Singapore Patent Application No. 200903146-9 mailed Mar. 25, 2011, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,664 mailed Sep. 23, 2015, 13 pages. |
Japanese Office Action for Patent Application No. 2015-151779, mailed Jul. 12, 2016, with English Translation, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160150551 A1 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60290877 | May 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13782664 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15012746 | US | |
Parent | 13534561 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 13782664 | US | |
Parent | 13042134 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13534561 | US | |
Parent | 12648470 | Dec 2009 | US |
Child | 13042134 | US | |
Parent | 11656647 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12648470 | US | |
Parent | 10768312 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 11656647 | US | |
Parent | 10029569 | Dec 2001 | US |
Child | 10768312 | US |