Dynamic channel quality measurement procedure implemented in a wireless digital communication system to prioritize the forwarding of downlink data

Abstract
A wireless digital communication system includes a base station in communication with a plurality of user equipment mobile terminals (UEs). The system prioritizes the forwarding of blocks of downlink data to designated ones of the UEs. The system employs adaptive modulation and coding (AM&C) to achieve improved radio resource utilization and provides optimum data rates for user services. Blocks of downlink (DL) data are received by the base station which requests downlink (DL) channel quality measurements only from those mobile terminals (UEs) with pending downlink transmissions. The UEs respond to the request by measuring and reporting DL channel quality to the base station, which then allocates resources such that the UEs will make best use of radio resources. The base station notifies the UEs of the physical channel allocation indicating the modulation/coding rate and allocated slots followed by transmission of blocks of downlink data which are transmitted to the UEs.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to wireless digital communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to communication stations which employ code-division multiple access (CDMA) technology. Specifically, the present invention relates to determining radio conditions for use in optimizing radio resource utilization as well as selecting data rates for user services.


In code-division multiple access (CDMA) third generation (3G) cellular telecommunication systems, adaptive modulation and coding (AM&C) techniques are applied to transmissions in order to achieve improved radio resource utilization and provide increased data rates for user services under appropriate conditions. These AM&C techniques take into account radio conditions in advance of transmissions in order to determine modulation and coding rates that take the greatest advantage of current radio propagation conditions utilizing these techniques.


Utilizing these AM&C techniques, a procedure is required that provides a physical channel quality measurement from the receiver in advance of each transmission. Based on this quality measurement, the transmitter determines the appropriate modulation and coding rate for the particular transmission.


In CDMA systems, as with any wireless systems, radio conditions can change rapidly due to a wide variety of both natural and man-made conditions. Since the channel quality measurement is used to determine transmission modulation and coding, and since channel quality changes rapidly due to the changing conditions of the transmission path, the performance of the adaptive transmission process is directly related to the length of the time period between when the channel quality measurement is performed and when the transmission is initiated.


Physical or logical control channels are then used to transfer the channel quality measurements from the receiver to the transmitter. Channel quality signaling may utilize either dedicated control channels to each user equipment (UE) or common control channels shared by all UEs. A UE may be a cellular phone, PDA (personal data assistant) or any other type of wireless device. When dedicated control channels are used, a continuous signaling channel is available over time for propagation of channel quality measurements for each UE. This is an optimal solution for AM&C since the quality measurement is continuously available. Transmissions can occur at any time, taking into account the continuously available quality measurement for appropriate modulation and coding settings. Additionally, with a dedicated control channel always available in the uplink, the channel can be also used to support low rate uplink data transmissions.


The difficulty with the dedicated control channel approach is that physical resources are continuously allocated even when there is no data to transmit. A primary application of AM&C techniques is non-real time high data rate services, for example, Internet access. For these classes of service, the best quality of service (QoS) is achieved with short, high rate transmissions with relatively long idle periods between each transmission. These long idle periods result in an inefficient use of dedicated resources.


The problem can be minimized with pre-configured periodic dedicated channel allocations. But this results in periodic availability of quality measurements. If the quality measurements are not continuously available, for UEs which have transmissions at anyone point in time, only some portion of the UEs will have recent channel quality measurements.


Another alternative is the use of common control channels. With common control channels, a continuous signaling channel exists that is shared between all UEs within the cell. Procedures are defined for determining each UEs access to the common control channel. UE identities are used to distinguish UE specific transactions.


The difficulty with the common control approach for support of AM&C is the large amount of signaling overhead necessary to administrate each UE's access to the control channel. As aforementioned, UE identities are required to distinguish UE specific transactions. Additionally, to avoid contention-based access to the uplink common control channel, individual allocations are required to be signaled on the downlink common control channel for each UE's access. Since uplink transmissions cannot always be predicted, periodic allocations of the uplink control channel must be signaled on the downlink common control channel, which results in considerable signaling overhead. Also, the common control approach does not provide for low rate, uplink data transmissions.


In summary, the efficient performance of AM&C techniques is primarily based on the availability of recent physical channel quality measurements from the receiver in advance of each transmission. Optimally, measurements are available with minimal latency for all users with active data transmissions. The dedicated control channel solution provides continuous measurements, but since transmissions are discontinuous, this is an inefficient use of radio resources. Periodic configured dedicated control channels minimize the radio resource requirement, but this increases measurement latency. The common control channel method can provide measurements on a continuous or periodic basis, but the signaling overhead results in an inefficient use of radio resources.


There exists a need for a system that provides channel quality measurements with low latency and low signaling overhead.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objectives of the present invention will become apparent upon consideration of the accompanying detailed description and figures, in which:



FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating one preferred Dynamic Channel Quality Measurement Procedure (DCQMP) of the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows an alternative embodiment of the DCQMP of the present invention shown in FIG. 1.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Presently preferred embodiments are described below with reference to the drawing figures wherein like numerals represent like elements throughout.



FIG. 1 is a flow diagram which illustrates the dynamic channel quality (CQ) measurement procedure 60 of the present invention which may be implemented by a wireless digital communication system having a base station/node B (hereinafter base station 12) which communicates with at least one UE 30. Although it is intended for the presently inventive method to support communications between a base station and a plurality of UEs, for simplicity the following description will detail the steps performed by a single UE, it being understood that other UEs will operate in a similar manner.


Blocks of downlink (DL) data are transferred to the base station 12 which are designated for a particular UE 30 (step S1).


The base station 12, responsive to receipt of downlink data and in advance of a transmission to the UE 30, requests DL CQ measurements only from a UE 30 having pending downlink transmissions (step S2).


The UE 30 receives the request and makes the requested CQ measurement at step S3 and reports the DL CQ measurement to the base station 12 at step S4.


Based on the CQ measurement reports received from each UE (step S5), the base station 12 determines which of the UEs will make the best use of radio resources, and determines which slots to use (step S6). Preferably, the UEs are prioritized by their CQ so that the UE with the highest CQ is sent its data first and then the UE with the second highest CQ is sent its data second, and so on until the UE with the lowest CQ is sent its data last.


Since the CQ measurement requests and the responsive CQ measurement reports are only generated when needed, the signaling overhead required for a common control channel is greatly reduced. Measurement reports are available for all active transmitting users, similar to the dedicated control channel case, but avoiding the resource inefficiency during idle periods.


The priority of transmissions is determined according to the DL CQ measurements, and the DL physical channel allocation is signaled to the appropriate UEs, indicating the particular coding rate, modulation type and allocated slots (step S7). The designated UE receives the coding rate, modulation type and allocated slots (step S8), and sets these parameters for reception (step S9).


Blocks of downlink data are then transmitted by the base station 12 to the designated UE 30 (step S10) a given, but short, time after performance of step S7 to enable the UE 30 time to set up for reception. The UE 30 receives the downlink data (step S11) at the specified coding rate, modulation type and in the allocated slots specified at step S7.


The present invention thus provides the fundamental requirements for AM&C operation while maintaining the most efficient use of radio resources. Since DL CQ measurements are available with the minimum possible latency for all transmissions, the choice of the best user(s) to provide service in the next transmission time frame is optimized. Additionally, measurements provided by periodic or continuous mechanisms do not provide increased benefit, performance gain or enhancement over the present invention.


Implementation of the present invention also minimizes measurement processing and the associated power consumption, especially important in the UE, which is typically powered by a small power source of limited capacity, (i.e. a chargeable battery). Since a quality measurement is only requested for a particular active transmission, the number of required measurements are minimized.


In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the method 70 of the present invention shown in FIG. 2, only certain quality measurements may be required depending on the radio resources used for a particular transmission. For example, in the 3G standards, the CQ for only specific physical timeslots may be requested. Therefore, the number of measurements performed is reduced by limiting the requirement of a CQ measurement to only active transmissions and, depending on the scale of the transmission, only requiring measurement on particular radio resources, (i.e., specific time slots). This is shown in FIG. 2, which is similar to FIG. 1 except for modified steps S2A and S3A, which replace steps S2 and S3 respectively of FIG. 1. In step S2A, the base station 12 requests the UE 30 to perform a measurement only on a particular radio resource. In response, the UE performs the DL CQ measurement on the specified radio resource (step S3A).


The present invention provides many advantages over prior art schemes. First, the invention provides the highest efficiency utilization of the air interface since only those UEs having pending transmissions will be required to respond to a request for DL CQ measurements. This permits the overhead signaling to be at a minimum.


Second, since the transmissions are prioritized according to the highest quality DL CQ measurements, the highest data rates permissible will be achieved for each time slot or multiple time slots.


Third, since UEs are only required to respond to the request for the DL CQ measurements, unnecessary measurements by the UEs will not be required, thereby saving the battery life of the UEs.


A final advantage of the present invention is the increased number of users that may be supported in a cell for both of the methods disclosed herein. The number of users that are supported is limited in the dedicated control channel method by the requirement for dedicated radio resources; and in the common control channel method by signaling overhead requirements. By limiting the measurement signaling procedures to active users, the present invention minimizes the common control signaling overhead and supports the greatest number of users in the cell.


While the present invention has been described in terms of the preferred embodiment, other variations which are within the scope of the invention as outlined in the claims below will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A receiver and transmitter of a User Equipment (UE) for use in a wireless digital communication system, wherein the receiver and transmitter of the UE comprise: the receiver of the UE operable using radio resources of the wireless digital communication system to receive non-periodic requests from a base station operating within the wireless digital communication system, the requests to provide channel quality information (CQI) regarding specific radio resources as a subset of the radio resources, wherein the requests are to be received via the receiver of the UE from the base station;the transmitter of the UE configured to transmit the channel quality information (CQI) with respect to the specific radio resources of the wireless digital communication system that are the subset of the radio resources in response to the non-periodic requests from the base station;the receiver of the UE being further operable to receive a coding rate and an allocation of the radio resources from the base station operating within the wireless digital communication system, wherein the coding rate is based on the channel quality information (CQI), and wherein the allocation of radio resources is based on a prioritization of UEs based on the channel quality information (CQI) received from the UEs; andwherein the receiver of the UE is further operable to receive downlink data via the subset of radio resources based on the coding rate and the allocation of the radio resources received from the base station operating within the wireless digital communication system, wherein UEs with a higher channel quality receive the downlink data before UEs with lower channel quality.
  • 2. The receiver and transmitter of the User Equipment (UE) of claim 1, wherein the receiver and transmitter are embedded within the User Equipment (UE) to enable wireless digital communications by the User Equipment (UE) within the wireless digital communication system.
  • 3. The receiver and transmitter of the User Equipment (UE) of claim 1, wherein the allocation of the radio resources from the base station operating within the wireless digital communication system further includes a modulation type and an allocated time slot.
  • 4. The receiver and transmitter of the User Equipment (UE) of claim 1, wherein each request to provide CQ measurement reports is transmitted over a common control channel or a dedicated control channel of the wireless digital communication system.
  • 5. The receiver and transmitter of the User Equipment (UE) of claim 1, wherein the receiver is operable to receive downlink transmission parameters associated with the downlink data.
  • 6. The receiver and transmitter of the User Equipment (UE) of claim 1, wherein the receiver is operable to receive a request to provide one of a number of types of channel quality information.
  • 7. The receiver and transmitter of the User Equipment (UE) of claim 6, wherein a first type of channel quality information comprises the channel quality information regarding the subset of the radio resources.
  • 8. The receiver and transmitter of the User Equipment (UE) of claim 7, wherein a second type of channel quality information comprises channel quality information regarding the entire radio resources.
  • 9. A receiver and transmitter of a base station operating within a wireless digital communication system, the receiver and transmitter of the base station comprising: the transmitter of the base station configured to use radio resources of the wireless digital communication system to output a first type of non-periodic requests from the base station for a downlink channel quality measurement report regarding specified radio resources as a subset of the radio resources, wherein non-periodic requests are to be transmitted to a User Equipment (UE) to establish a downlink channel from the base station to the user equipment (UE);the receiver of the base station to receive the requested downlink channel quality measurement report regarding the specified radio resources that are the subset of the radio resources in response to the non-periodic requests;the transmitter of the base station being further operable to output a coding rate and an allocation of the radio resources to the UE, wherein the coding rate is based on the requested downlink channel quality measurement report regarding the specified radio resources, and wherein the allocation of radio resources is based on a prioritization of UEs based on the requested downlink channel quality measurement report regarding the specified radio resources as received at the base station from the UE; andthe transmitter of the base station being further operable to establish the downlink channel with the user equipment (UE) in response to the received downlink channel quality measurement report based on the coding rate and the allocation of the radio resources outputted from the base station, wherein user equipment (UE) with a higher channel quality receive downlink data before UEs with lower channel quality.
  • 10. The receiver and transmitter of the base station of claim 9, wherein the receiver and transmitter are embedded within the base station to enable wireless digital communications by the base station within the wireless digital communication system with a plurality of UEs operating with the wireless digital communications system.
  • 11. The receiver and transmitter of the base station of claim 9, wherein the first type of non-periodic requests are associated with the subset of the specified radio resources.
  • 12. The receiver and transmitter of the base station of claim 9, wherein a first type of channel quality information comprises channel quality information regarding the subset of the specified radio resources and further wherein a second type of channel quality information comprises channel quality information regarding an entirety of the radio resources.
  • 13. The receiver and transmitter of the base station of claim 9, wherein the transmitter of the base station, responsive to the receiver receiving the downlink channel quality measurement report, is operable to output a downlink physical channel allocation of radio resources for transmission to the user equipment (UE) for use in receiving downlink data via the downlink channel.
  • 14. The receiver and transmitter of the base station of claim 9, wherein the downlink physical channel allocation of radio resources specifies the coding rate, a modulation type, and allocated timeslot(s).
  • 15. Non-transitory processing means having instructions for transmitting and receiving by a user equipment (UE) operating within a wireless digital communication system to cause a user equipment (UE) to perform operations comprising: operating using radio resources of the wireless digital communication system;receiving via a receiver of the user equipment (UE) non-periodic requests from a base station operating within the wireless digital communication system to provide channel quality information (CQI) regarding specific radio resources as a subset of the radio resources, wherein the request are to be received via the receiver of the UE from the base station;transmitting via a transmitter of the user equipment (UE) the channel quality information (CQI) with respect to the specific radio resources of the wireless digital communication system that are the subset of the radio resources in response to the non-periodic requests from the base station;receiving via the receiver of the user equipment (UE), a coding rate and an allocation of the radio resources from the base station operating within the wireless digital communication system, wherein the coding rate is based on the channel quality information (CQI), and wherein the allocation of radio resources is based on a prioritization of UEs based on the channel quality information (CQI) received from the UEs; andreceiving via the receiver of the user equipment (UE), downlink data via the subset of radio resources based on the coding rate and the allocation of the radio resources received from the base station operating within the wireless digital communication system, wherein UEs with a higher channel quality receive the downlink data before UEs with lower channel quality.
  • 16. The non-transitory processing means of claim 15, wherein the processing means, the receiver, and the transmitter, are embedded within the User Equipment (UE) to enable wireless digital communications by the User Equipment (UE) within the wireless digital communication system.
  • 17. The non-transitory processing means of claim 15, wherein the allocation of the radio resources from the base station operating within the wireless digital communication system further includes a modulation type and an allocated time slot.
  • 18. The non-transitory processing means of claim 15, wherein each request to provide CQ measurement reports is transmitted over a common control channel or a dedicated control channel of the wireless digital communication system.
  • 19. The non-transitory processing means of claim 15, wherein the receiver is operable to receive downlink transmission parameters associated with the downlink data.
  • 20. The non-transitory processing means of claim 15: wherein the receiver is operable to receive a request to provide one of a number of types of channel quality information;wherein a first type of channel quality information comprises the channel quality information regarding the subset of the radio resources; andwherein a second type of channel quality information comprises channel quality information regarding the entire radio resources.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This United States non-provisional continuation utility patent application is related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Mar. 1, 2013, having an application Ser. No. 13/782,664, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Jun. 27, 2012, having an application Ser. No. 13/534,561, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Mar. 7, 2011, having an application Ser. No. 13/042,134, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Dec. 29, 2009, having an application Ser. No. 12/648,470, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MINIMIZING OVERHEAD SIGNALING AND OPTIMIZING RADIO RESOURCE UTILIZATION,” filed Jan. 23, 2007, having an application Ser. No. 11/656,647, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTED IN A WIRELESS DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM TO PRIORITIZE THE FORWARDING OF DOWNLINK DATA,” filed Jan. 30, 2004, having an application Ser. No. 10/768,312, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the non-provisional application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE FOR ADAPTIVE MODULATION AND CODING TECHNIQUES,” filed Dec. 21, 2001, having an application Ser. No. 10/029,569, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference; this application is further related to, and claims priority to, the provisional utility application entitled “DYNAMIC CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE FOR ADAPTIVE MODULATION AND CODING TECHNIQUES,” filed May 14, 2001, having an application Ser. No. 60/290,877, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (64)
Number Name Date Kind
5375123 Andersson et al. Dec 1994 A
5701294 Ward Dec 1997 A
5764648 Yamane et al. Jun 1998 A
5778316 Persson et al. Jul 1998 A
5828672 Labonte et al. Oct 1998 A
5862451 Grau et al. Jan 1999 A
5867478 Baum et al. Feb 1999 A
5940439 Kleider et al. Aug 1999 A
5949790 Pehkonen et al. Sep 1999 A
5956642 Larsson Sep 1999 A
5960335 Umemoto Sep 1999 A
5991627 Honkasalo Nov 1999 A
6101179 Soliman Aug 2000 A
6115406 Mesecher Sep 2000 A
6137991 Isaksson Oct 2000 A
6144653 Persson et al. Nov 2000 A
6167031 Olofsson et al. Dec 2000 A
6208663 Schramm et al. Mar 2001 B1
6298035 Heiskala Oct 2001 B1
6301265 Kleider et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307867 Roobol et al. Oct 2001 B1
6330288 Budka et al. Dec 2001 B1
6347071 Cupo et al. Feb 2002 B1
6366601 Ghosh et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373877 Mesecher Apr 2002 B1
6374118 Toskala et al. Apr 2002 B1
6498936 Raith Dec 2002 B1
6545997 Bohnke et al. Apr 2003 B1
6584092 Sudo Jun 2003 B1
6587697 Terry et al. Jul 2003 B2
6597697 Petersen Jul 2003 B1
6615054 Terry et al. Sep 2003 B2
6650624 Quigley et al. Nov 2003 B1
6700881 Kong et al. Mar 2004 B1
6721569 Hashem et al. Apr 2004 B1
6745045 Terry et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760598 Kurjenniemi Jul 2004 B1
6791960 Song Sep 2004 B1
6801513 Gibbons et al. Oct 2004 B1
6810236 Terry et al. Oct 2004 B2
6850540 Peisa Feb 2005 B1
6868277 Cerwall Mar 2005 B1
6909901 Terry et al. Jun 2005 B2
6928065 Logalbo et al. Aug 2005 B2
6934340 Dollard Aug 2005 B1
6947490 Edwards et al. Sep 2005 B1
6952591 Budka et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958989 Dick et al. Oct 2005 B1
6963540 Choi et al. Nov 2005 B2
6987746 Song Jan 2006 B1
7035234 Toskala et al. Apr 2006 B2
7089015 Fukui Aug 2006 B2
7116653 Bemmer et al. Oct 2006 B1
7127256 Terry et al. Oct 2006 B2
7171163 Terry et al. Jan 2007 B2
7209711 Terry et al. Apr 2007 B2
7227854 Kim et al. Jun 2007 B2
7236474 Seo et al. Jun 2007 B2
7274947 Koo et al. Sep 2007 B2
7639989 Terry et al. Dec 2009 B2
7904026 Terry et al. Mar 2011 B2
8219036 Terry et al. Jul 2012 B2
20020110101 Gopalakrishnan Aug 2002 A1
20030123414 Tong et al. Jul 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
1277764 Dec 2000 CN
0717580 Jun 1996 EP
0755133 Jan 1997 EP
0899906 Mar 1999 EP
0944201 Sep 1999 EP
08-149132 Jun 1996 JP
2000-151639 May 2000 JP
2001-515306 Sep 2001 JP
2002-527938 Aug 2002 JP
2002-538697 Nov 2002 JP
WO-9722218 Jun 1997 WO
WO-0021235 Apr 2000 WO
WO-00-21235 Apr 2000 WO
WO-0051390 Aug 2000 WO
WO-0072496 Nov 2000 WO
WO-0076114 Dec 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (47)
Entry
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,561 mailed Sep. 13, 2012, 18 pages.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200910001226.2 mailed Oct. 12, 2012, 6 pages.
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Apr. 30, 2013, 3 pages.
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Sep. 2, 2011, 7 pages.
“History of Study '90-'99,” NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation), Apr. 30, 2001, pp. 68-69.
Final Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Feb. 4, 2011, 19 pages.
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2012-000113 mailed Mar. 19, 2013, 3 pages.
Office Action from Taiwanese Application No. 099121594 mailed Mar. 28, 2013, 4 pages.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200910001226.2 mailed Aug. 6, 2013, 6 pages.
Office Action from European Application No. 10181279.0 mailed Sep. 4, 2013, 4 pages.
Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2012-000113 mailed Aug. 27, 2013, 4 pages.
Office Action from Norwegian Application No. 20101711 mailed Sep. 21, 2013, 3 pages.
Rejection on Appeal from Japanese Application No. 2009-188666 mailed Oct. 2, 2013, 3 pages.
Office Action from Taiwan Application No. 100142409 mailed Mar. 14, 2014, 5 pages.
Office Action from Norwegian Application No. 20101711 mailed Mar. 25, 2014, 2 pages.
Office Action from Norwegian Application No. 20101711 mailed Oct. 20, 2012, 3 pages.
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), RRC Protocol Specification, 3GPP TS 25.331 version 4.0.0 Release 4, Apr. 6, 2001, 38 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/534,561 mailed Jan. 7, 2013, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Apr. 19, 2011, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed May 24, 2011, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Sep. 14, 2011, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Jan. 10, 2012, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Jan. 31, 2012, 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/042,134 mailed Jun. 1, 2012, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,211 mailed Sep. 28, 2004, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,211 mailed Jun. 15, 2005, 6 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,223 mailed May 23, 2006, 6 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,223 mailed Oct. 3, 2005, 13 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,223 mailed Mar. 13, 2006, 15 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,312 mailed Jun. 23, 2006, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,312 mailed Sep. 25, 2006, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,313 mailed Nov. 16, 2006, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/768,313 mailed Aug. 9, 2006, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Aug. 12, 2009, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Apr. 3, 2009, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Jul. 25, 2008, 15 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,647 mailed Nov. 13, 2007, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,470 mailed Oct. 20, 2010, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,470 mailed Jun. 11, 2010, 10 pages.
Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,664, 71 pages.
First Official Action dated Sep. 2, 2014 (+ English translation), in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-269312, 4 pages.
Extended European Search Report from EP14192732.7 mailed Feb. 27, 2015, 7 pgs.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,664 dated Mar. 12, 2015, 25 pages.
Second Official Action dated Mar. 31, 2015 (+ English translation), in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-269312, 4 pages.
Search Report for Singapore Patent Application No. 200903146-9 mailed Mar. 25, 2011, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/782,664 mailed Sep. 23, 2015, 13 pages.
Japanese Office Action for Patent Application No. 2015-151779, mailed Jul. 12, 2016, with English Translation, 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160150551 A1 May 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60290877 May 2001 US
Continuations (7)
Number Date Country
Parent 13782664 Mar 2013 US
Child 15012746 US
Parent 13534561 Jun 2012 US
Child 13782664 US
Parent 13042134 Mar 2011 US
Child 13534561 US
Parent 12648470 Dec 2009 US
Child 13042134 US
Parent 11656647 Jan 2007 US
Child 12648470 US
Parent 10768312 Jan 2004 US
Child 11656647 US
Parent 10029569 Dec 2001 US
Child 10768312 US