The entirety of each of the following applications is hereby incorporated herein by reference:
U.S. Pat. No. 8,582,637 titled “Low-Complexity, Highly-Spectrally-Efficient Communications;”
U.S. Pat. No. 8,553,821 titled “Adaptive Non-Linear Model for Highly-Spectrally-Efficient Communications;”
U.S. Pat. No. 8,842,778 titled “Multi-Mode Receiver for Highly-Spectrally-Efficient Communications;” and
U.S. Pat. No. 8,744,003 titled “Multi-Mode Receiver for Highly-Spectrally-Efficient Communications.”
Limitations and disadvantages of conventional modulators and demodulators, and methods of operating them, will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such approaches with some aspects of the present method and system set forth in the remainder of this disclosure with reference to the drawings.
Methods and systems are provided for multimode modulation and demodulation, substantially as illustrated by and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
Aspects of this patent disclosure provide for switching between modulator/demodulator configurations without introducing errors as a result of the change in configuration. Different configurations may, for example, correspond to different symbol rates. Different configurations may, for example, correspond to different amounts of controlled inter-symbol interference (ISI) introduced to the transmitted signal. For example, a first configuration may use be a near-zero ISI configuration (e.g., using Nyquist signaling) and a second configuration may introduce a significant (e.g., amount that would result in errors above a desired threshold if demodulation relied on symbol-by-symbol slicing) but controlled amount of ISI (e.g., using partial response or faster than Nyquist signaling). As used herein, the term “inter-symbol correlated (ISC) signal” will refer to a signal having a significant but controlled amount of ISI. Partial response signals and faster-than-Nyquist-rate signals are thus two examples of ISC signals. Similarly, a Nyquist rate signal to which a controlled nonlinear distortion has been introduced resulting in significant ISI is another example of an ISC signal.
Switching between modulator/demodulator configurations may be needed to maintain a stable link in the case of dynamic channels. At any given time, a modulator and demodulator pair may, for example, switch to a configuration that provides maximal throughput for the current channel conditions. Such conditions may include, for example, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), fading, co-channel interference, adjacent channel interference, nonlinear distortion, and/or the like. In some applications, to prevent the reconfiguration from introducing errors the change in configurations may be synchronized between modulator and demodulator.
Partial response or faster-than-Nyquist based modulation (e.g., as described in the above-incorporated U.S. patents) may use higher symbol rate than Nyquist based modulation for a given throughput. In this case, the symbol of the partial response modulation carries less information bits comparing to the Nyquist-based modulation. Furthermore, different partial response or faster-than-Nyquist configurations of the modulator/demodulator may use different combinations of symbol rate and spectral efficiency to provide a desired threshold SNR to accommodate channel conditions.
Aspects of this disclosure provide for synchronizing a modulator and demodulator such that timing discontinuity can be avoided when switching between a Nyquist-based configuration and a faster-than-Nyquist configuration or between faster-than-Nyquist configurations of different spectral densities.
In an example embodiment, a high-level link management protocol may be executed by circuitry of the modulator and demodulator. Either in-band and/or out-of-band maintenance communication channel(s) may be used to carry messages of the protocol. A change in configuration may be triggered based on an indication of demodulation performance generated by the demodulator. The indication of demodulation performance may comprise, for example, received signal strength of the desired signal, mean square error (MSE), received signals strength of undesired signals (interference), bit error rate (BER), symbol error rate (SER), amount of nonlinear distortion (e.g., an error vector magnitude measurement), amount of phase noise, and/or the like. Once circuitry tasked with managing the link (e.g., the CPU of the modulator, the CPU of the demodulator, or some other link manager). Once a decision is made to switch modulator/demodulator configurations, control traffic carrying information about the new configuration is transmitted over the maintenance channel to the remote to configuration control circuitry of the modulator (where the decision is made by the demodulator), to configuration control circuitry of the demodulator (where the decision is made by the modulator), or to both configuration control circuitry of the modulator and configuration control circuitry of the demodulator (where the decision is managed by a third-party link manager). The link management circuitry of the modulator writes parameters for the new configuration into a set of shadow registers in the modulator and the link management circuitry of the demodulator writes parameters for the new configuration into shadow registers in the demodulator. The configuration parameters may include, for example, different symbol mapping (e.g., different symbol mappings may correspond to different symbol constellations having different number of bits per symbol), interpolation ratio for a desired symbol rate, taps coefficients of a pulse shaping filter of the modulator, symbol pilot rate, FEC code rate, number of FEC frames per preamble, number of stuffing bits needed to complete frames, and/or the like. The circuitry of both the modulator and demodulator may switch between the actual and shadow registers at a time instant synchronized with the advance of the first frame of the new configuration through the modulator and demodulator pipelines, as explained below.
The encoder circuit 102 comprises circuitry operable to perform forward error correction coding on this signal 101 to generate the signal 103. The encoder circuit 102 may support a plurality of FEC algorithms (e.g., low-density parity check, Reed-Solomon, turbo coding, etc.) and/or a plurality of FEC code rates. The FEC algorithm and/or code rate used by the encoder circuit 102 may vary with different configurations of the modulator 100, as controlled by configuration controller 118.
The symbol mapper circuit 104 comprises circuitry operable to map groups of one or more bits to symbols using a determined symbol constellation. The symbol constellation used by symbol mapper circuit 104 may vary with different configurations of the modulator 100, as controlled by configuration controller 118.
The preamble generator circuit 106 comprises circuitry operable to generate preamble sequences. The preamble generator circuit 106 may generate preambles sequences comprising any number and/or type of symbols, where different preamble sequences may be used for different configurations of the modulator 100, as controlled by configuration controller 118. Furthermore, as discussed below, different preamble sequences may be used for signaling transitions between configurations of the modulator 100.
The pilot generator circuit 110 comprises circuitry operable to generate pilot symbols. The phase, amplitude, frequency, and/or any other characteristics of the generated pilots symbols may vary with different configurations of the modulator 100, as controlled by configuration controller 118.
The framer circuit 108 comprises circuitry operable to generate frames by combining symbols from mapper 104, preambles from preamble generator 106, and pilots from pilot generator 110. The number and/or type of preambles sequences and/or pilot symbols added to any particular frame may vary with different configurations of the framer circuit 108, as controlled by configuration controller 118.
The pulse shaping filter circuit 112 comprises circuitry operable to filter the signal 109 such that it adheres to an applicable spectral mask specified by a regulatory authority (e.g., the FCC in the U.S.) or standards body (e.g., IEEE). The pulse shaping filter 112 may be similar to, or the same as, the pulse shaping filters described in the above-incorporated patents. The pulse shaping filter 112 may support a plurality of configurations for Nyquist rate signaling communications and a plurality of configurations for faster-than-Nyquist signaling. Number and/or value of tap coefficients of the pulse shaping filter 112 may vary with different configurations of the modulator 100. The configuration controller 118 may control which of the configurations that the pulse shaping filter 112 is in at any given time.
The resampling circuit 114 comprises circuitry operable to sample the symbols 113 output by pulse shaping filter 112 into samples of signal 115 output at the DAC clock rate, which may be higher than the symbol rate. In an example embodiment, the re-sampler 114 uses a numerically controlled oscillator and polyphase filter for achieving non-integer interpolation ratios.
The interface circuit 116 comprises circuitry operable to pre-condition the signal 115 to correct for non-idealities of the subsequent circuitry of the transmitter 130. For example, the interface circuit 116 may compensate for the response (zero order hold) of the DAC 122. As another example, the interface circuit 116 may compensate for I-Q mismatch introduced in the RF front-end 124.
The configuration controller 118 comprises circuitry operable to implement a link management protocol such as is described above. In this regard, the configuration controller 118 may make or receive (e.g., from a remote demodulator or third-party link management entity) decisions about a configuration in which the modulator 100 should be, and may perform actions (e.g., write configuration parameters to a shadow register in memory 120, generate link management messages to be transmitted via the maintenance channel(s), etc.) to effect reconfiguration of the modulator 100 (and, in some embodiments, trigger reconfiguration of a demodulator to which the modulator 100 transmits).
The memory 120 may comprise SRAM, DRAM, flash, magnetic storage, and/or other suitable type of memory serving as program memory, data memory, configuration registers, and long-term storage. In an example embodiment, the memory 120 comprises two configuration registers 126 and 128. At any given time, one of the registers 126 and 128 stores the parameters for the current configuration of the modulator 100 and the other of the registers 126 and 128 operates as a shadow register that can be loaded with new configuration parameters. Then, at a time instant determined by the configuration controller 118, the roles of the registers 126 and 128 are switched to effect the reconfiguration of the modulator 100. In this manner, there is no down time caused by the finite amount of time it takes to modify register contents.
In operation, packets received from a media access controller (MAC) of transmitter 130 are divided into fixed length frames. The optional encoder circuit 102 adds forward error correction bits to each frame. The mapper 104 then converts the frames of bits into frames of symbols. The framer 108 then appends a preamble sequence from preamble generator 106 to the beginning of each frame, and also inserts pilot symbols from pilot generator 110 at known places inside the frame. In an example embodiment, the preamble sequence is designed to have desired auto correlation characteristics. The symbols out of the framer 108 are filtered by the pulse shape filter 112 to generate samples of the signal 113. The re-sampler 114 interpolates the samples of signal 113 to generate signal 115. The DAC interface 116 which pre-conditions the signal 115 for processing by the digital-to-analog converter 122.
In an example embodiment, configuration switching is synchronized by marking the start and end of last frame of the old configuration. Three flags: SOF (Start of Frame), EOF (End of Frame) and LFR (last frame of current configuration) are used in an example embodiment, where LFR is active throughout the last frame from SOF to EOF. The flags accompany (e.g., as metadata appended to the signal data) the frames down the modulator pipeline from its input at the encoder 102 (or mapper 104, if encoder 102 is not present) to the re-sampler 114. In such an embodiment, configuration switching is initiated by the configuration controller 118 writing parameters of the new configuration to a register 126 or 128. Then, the next incoming frame after the write of the configuration parameters to register 126 or 128 is marked LFR (e.g., by encoder 102 or, where the encoder 102 is not present, by mapper 104). Switching of configuration registers at each stage (i.e., circuit) of the modulator is synchronized with the EOF of a frame flagged as LFR, such that the first symbol of the new frame is processed with the new configuration. Switching of interpolation ratio at the re-sampler 114 is performed after the last sample of the last symbol of LFR was generated.
To avoid errors and/or latency at the demodulator, the modulator 100 may generate signaling that alerts a demodulator as to the last frame to process using an old configuration before switching to a new configuration. In an example embodiment, such signaling may comprise: when SOF of a frame marked LFR arrives at the framer 108, the preamble generator 106 generates a negated preamble sequence. That is, each symbol is negated relative to the normal preamble symbol that is used for frames that are not marked LFR. In another embodiment, rather than simply negating the preamble sequence, an entirely different preamble sequence may be used for frames marked LFR. A drawback of this latter approach is that it adds complexity at the de-modulator. An advantage of the latter approach is that it may be more robust to harsh link conditions.
The pre-processor circuit 202 comprises circuitry operable to pre-condition samples from the ADC 216. In an example embodiment, the pre-processor circuit 202 performs “blind” adaptation that does not depend on the modulator/demodulator configuration. Such adaptations may include, for example, DC removal, automatic gain control, and I-Q mismatch correction.
The timing loop circuit 204 comprises circuitry operable to convert the samples of signal 203 into symbols of signal 205, regenerating the modulator symbol clock. The timing loop circuit 204 also comprises circuitry operable to generate frame synchronization flags SOF, LFR, and EOF (similar to as performed by modulator 100, as described above). Additional details of the timing loop 204 and how it synchronizes the configuration switching are described below with reference to
The adaptive loops circuit 206 comprises circuitry operable to condition the symbols based on error signal 209 from the decoder 208. Adaptive functions performed by the adaptive loops circuit 206 may comprise, for example: feed forward equalization, carrier recovery, and, where feed forward equalization is performed based on MMSE cost function, correction of bias introduced by the feed forward equalization. In the example embodiment shown, a carrier recovery function of the adaptive loops circuit 206 is operable to determine a difference in frequency between a local oscillator of the modulator 100 which generated the received signal and a local oscillator of the demodulator 200 and outputs the frequency difference as signal 219.
The decoder 208 comprises circuitry operable to translate symbols of the signal 207 into bits of the signal 209. The decoder 208 may support a plurality of FEC algorithms (e.g., low-density parity check, Reed-Solomon, turbo coding, etc.) and/or a plurality of FEC code rates. The FEC algorithm and/or code rate used by the decoder circuit 208 may vary with different configurations of the demodulator 200, as controlled by configuration controller 218. The circuitry of the decoder 208 is also operable to generate the error signal 209 which is used for adaptation of the adaptive loops circuit 206.
The configuration controller circuit 218 comprises circuitry operable to implement a link management protocol such as is described above. In this regard, the configuration controller 218 may make or receive (e.g., from a remote modulator or third-party link management entity) decisions about a configuration in which the demodulator 200 should be, and may perform actions (e.g., write configuration parameters to a shadow register in memory 212, generate link management messages to be transmitted via the maintenance channel(s), etc.) to effect reconfiguration of the demodulator 200 (and, in some embodiments, trigger reconfiguration of a modulator from which the demodulator 200 receives transmissions). In an example embodiment, the configuration controller 218 is operable to measure or calculate one or more indications of demodulation performance based on inputs and/or outputs of the other circuits of the receiver 230.
The memory 220 may comprise SRAM, DRAM, flash, magnetic storage, and/or other suitable type of memory serving as program memory, data memory, configuration registers, and long-term storage. In an example embodiment, the memory 220 comprises two configuration registers 226 and 228. At any given time, one of the registers 226 and 228 stores the parameters for the current configuration of the demodulator 200 and the other of the registers 226 and 228 operates as a shadow register that can be loaded with new configuration parameters. Then, at a time instant determined by the configuration controller 218, the roles of the registers 226 and 228 are switched to effect the reconfiguration of the demodulator 200. In this manner, there is no down time caused by the finite amount of time it takes to modify register contents.
In operation, a signal is received from a channel by AFE 214, the analog signal 215 output by the AFE 214 is digitized by ADC 216 resulting in signal 201. Signal 201 is processed by pre-processor 202 to generate signal 203 which is processed by timing loop 204 to generate signal 205. Signal 205 is processed by adaptive loops circuit 206, based on error signal 209, to generate signal 207. Symbols of signal 207 are then decoded to bits of signal 209.
The re-sampler circuit 302 comprises circuitry operable to convert input samples of signal 203 into symbols of signal 303. In an example embodiment, the re-sampler circuit 302 performs non-integer decimation of the samples using an NCO and PolyPhase filter—like the re-sampler 114 of the modulator 100. The output signal 303 carries symbols at (ideally) the same rate and phase as signal 113 of the modulator 100 that generated the received signal.
The frequency rotator 304 comprises circuitry operable to rotate the complex-valued symbols of signal 303 such that it compensates for difference in frequency between the local oscillators of the modulator 100 that generated the received signal and the demodulator 200. The frequency rotator 304 receives the frequency difference as signal 219 from the adaptive loops circuit 206. The signal 305 output by the frequency rotator 304 carries symbols at (ideally) a constant phase, except for phase jitter.
The timing phase-locked loop (PLL) 306 comprises circuity operable to correct the timing drift between the symbol clocks of the demodulator 200 and the modulator 100 that generated the received signal. In an example embodiment, the correction comprises modifying the increment step of a numerically controlled oscillator (NCO) of the re-sampler 302 step such that the re-sampler 302 outputs a determined number of symbols between consecutive preamble sequences. Each of the filter circuit 314, the DAGC 312, and the preamble synchronization circuit 308 inserts a delay of a known number of symbols such that the total delay of the timing loop is a known number of symbols. In an example embodiment, the known delay introduced by each of circuits 314, 312, and 308 may be fixed such that the total delay of the timing loop is fixed.
The preamble synchronization circuit 308 comprises, for example, a correlator 320 operable to detect preamble sequences in the signal 313 and a state machine 324 that synchronizes to a series of preambles at programmable distance (i.e., programmable number of symbols between consecutive preamble sequences). In an example embodiment, the preamble synchronization circuit 308 comprises a phase detector 322 at the output of the correlator 320. The phase detector 322 may be activated by configuration controller 210 when a configuration switch is expected. When active, the phase detector 322 may be operable to detect a preamble sequence that indicates LFR (e.g., detects a negated preamble sequence) and indicate such preamble detection by asserting signal 319 (e.g., asserts signal 319 at the end of the preamble sequence).
The aligner circuit 310 comprises circuitry operable to generate framing synchronization flags (SOF. EOF, LFR) such that downstream circuits (e.g., adaptive loops circuit 206 and decoder circuit 208) can switch configurations at the appropriate time (i.e., after EOF of a frame flagged as LFR). In an example embodiment, since the length of the preamble sequence, the gap between frames, and all the delays of the timing loop 204 are known, the aligner circuit generates the EOF and SOF flags referred to the output of the re-sampler 302 by counting symbols from a preamble detection indication on signal 219.
The digital automatic gain correction (DAGC) circuit 312 comprises circuitry operable to adjust the level of signal 315 output by filter 314.
The receive filter circuit 314 comprises, for example, a low pass filter operable to attenuate the out-of-band components. For a faster-than-Nyquist signaling configuration of the demodulator 200, the filter 314 may, for example, have a response other than square root raised cosine. For a Nyquist-rate signaling configuration of the demodulator 200, the filter 314 may, for example, have a square root raised cosine response.
In an example embodiment, the re-sampler circuit 302 changes its decimation factor after the last sample of a frame marked as LFR. This ensures that the configuration switch is synchronized with a corresponding configuration switch in the modulator that generated the received signal. The LFR indication on signal 319 from the preamble synchronization circuit 308 may lag behind the frame sync signals of the received signal. Accordingly, the aligner circuit 310 may delay the samples to downstream circuits (e.g., adaptive loops circuit 206 and decoder 208) such that its LFR output is properly aligned with EOF and SOF. This makes it possible for the decoder 208 to change the LFR-indicating preamble sequence to a normal preamble sequence.
In accordance with an example embodiment of this disclosure, a transmitter (e.g., 130) may comprise a modulator circuit (e.g., 100) configurable into at least two configurations, wherein at least one of the configurations is an inter-symbol correlated signaling (e.g., partial response signaling or faster-than-Nyquist-rate signaling) configuration. Which of the configurations the modulator operates in at a particular time is determined based on an indication of performance. At least one other of the configurations may be a Nyquist-rate signaling configuration. The modulator may comprise circuitry (e.g., encoder 102, mapper 104, preamble generator 106, framer 108, pilot generator 110, pulse shaping filter 112, and re-sampler 114) that is operable to, upon a decision to switch from a first one of the configurations to a second one of the configurations, mark (e.g., set a flag bit) a last frame generated with the first configuration. The modulator may comprise a framing circuit (e.g., 108) that is operable to detect start of frame indicators in frames that it processes, and detect whether frames that it processes are marked as a last frame of a current one of the configurations. The framing circuity may be operable to, upon detecting a start of frame indicator of a frame marked as a last frame of a current one of the configurations, add a last-frame-indicating preamble to the last frame. The last-frame-indicating preamble may be a negated version of a preamble used for other frames (i.e., frames that are not the last frames generated before modulator reconfiguration). The indication of performance may be an indication of demodulation performance received from a receiver to which the transmitter transmits. The indication of demodulation performance may be one or more of: received signal strength, mean square error, bit error rate, symbol error rate, amount of interference, signal-to-noise ratio, amount of nonlinear distortion, amount of phase noise. The modulator may comprise circuitry (e.g., encoder 102 or mapper 104) that, in response to a decision to switch from a first of the configurations to a second of the configurations, is operable to generate a start of frame flag synchronized to the start of a last frame generated with the first of the configurations, generate an end of frame flag synchronized to the end of the last frame generated with the first of the configurations, and generate a last frame flag synchronized with the start of frame flag and the end of frame flag. The start of frame flag, the end of frame flag, and the last frame flag may propagate through a plurality of circuits of the modulator (e.g., encoder 102, mapper 104, preamble generator 106, framer 108, pilot generator 110, pulse shaping filter 112, and re-sampler 114) along with the last frame. For the reconfiguration of the modulator from the first configuration to the second configuration, reconfiguration of each of the plurality of the circuits of the modulator may be synchronized with one or more of the start of frame flag, the end of frame flag, and the last frame flag. Reconfiguration of the modulator among different ones of the configurations may comprise reconfiguration of taps coefficients of a pulse shaping filter of the modulator.
In accordance with an example embodiment of this disclosure, a receiver (e.g., 230) comprises a demodulator circuit (e.g., 200), wherein in a first configuration, the demodulator circuit is configured to demodulate faster-than-Nyquist-rate signals, and in a second configuration, the demodulator circuit is configured to demodulate Nyquist-rate signals. The demodulator circuit may be operable to dynamically (i.e., in real-time) switch between the first configuration and the second configuration. The demodulator circuit may be operable to measure demodulation performance for a received signal, and trigger a reconfiguration of the demodulator circuit between the first configuration and the second configuration in response to the measured demodulation performance. The demodulator circuit may be operable to trigger a reconfiguration of a modulator (e.g., 100) that generated the received signal in response to the measured demodulation performance. The measured demodulation performance may be characterized by one or more of the following: received signal strength, mean square error, bit error rate, symbol error rate, amount of interference, signal-to-noise ratio, amount of nonlinear distortion, amount of phase noise. The demodulator circuit may be operable to trigger a reconfiguration of the demodulator between the first configuration and the second configuration in response to an indication that a modulator from which it receives signal has been reconfigured. The indication that a modulator has been reconfigured may comprise a last-frame-indicating preamble. The last-frame-indicating preamble may be a negated version of a normal preamble. The receiver may comprise a preamble phase detector (e.g., 322) operable to determine a phase of a received preamble. The receiver may comprise a configuration controller (e.g., 218) that is operable to disable the preamble phase detector when a reconfiguration of the demodulator is not expected to occur within a determined amount of time, and enable the preamble phase detector in response to a determination that a reconfiguration of the of said demodulator is to occur within a determined amount of time.
As utilized herein the terms “circuits” and “circuitry” refer to physical electronic components (i.e. hardware) and any software and/or firmware (“code”) which may configure the hardware, be executed by the hardware, and or otherwise be associated with the hardware. As used herein, for example, a particular processor and memory may comprise a first “circuit” when executing a first one or more lines of code and may comprise a second “circuit” when executing a second one or more lines of code. As utilized herein, “and/or” means any one or more of the items in the list joined by “and/or”. As an example, “x and/or y” means any element of the three-element set {(x), (y), (x, y)}. In other words, “x and/or y” means “one or both of x and y”. As another example, “x, y, and/or z” means any element of the seven-element set {(x), (y), (z), (x, y), (x, z), (y, z), (x, y, z)}. In other words, “x, y and/or z” means “one or more of x, y and z”. As utilized herein, the term “exemplary” means serving as a non-limiting example, instance, or illustration. As utilized herein, the terms “e.g.,” and “for example” set off lists of one or more non-limiting examples, instances, or illustrations. As utilized herein, circuitry is “operable” to perform a function whenever the circuitry comprises the necessary hardware and code (if any is necessary) to perform the function, regardless of whether performance of the function is disabled or not enabled (e.g., by a user-configurable setting, factory trim, etc.).
The present method and/or system may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present methods and/or systems may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computing system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computing systems. Any kind of computing system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software may be a general-purpose computing system with a program or other code that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computing system such that it carries out the methods described herein. Another typical embodiment may comprise an application specific integrated circuit or chip. Some embodiments may comprise a non-transitory machine-readable (e.g., computer readable) medium (e.g., FLASH drive, optical disk, magnetic storage disk, or the like) having stored thereon one or more lines of code executable by a machine, thereby causing the machine to perform processes as described herein.
While the present method and/or system has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present method and/or system. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present disclosure without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present method and/or system not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but that the present method and/or system will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4109101 | Mitani | Aug 1978 | A |
4135057 | Bayless, Sr. et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4797925 | Lin | Jan 1989 | A |
5111484 | Karabinis | May 1992 | A |
5131011 | Bergmans et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5202903 | Okanoue | Apr 1993 | A |
5249200 | Chen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5283813 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5291516 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5394439 | Hemmati | Feb 1995 | A |
5432822 | Kaewell, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5459762 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5590121 | Geigel et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5602507 | Suzuki | Feb 1997 | A |
5757855 | Strolle et al. | May 1998 | A |
5784415 | Chevillat et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5818653 | Park et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5886748 | Lee | Mar 1999 | A |
5889823 | Agazzi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5915213 | Iwatsuki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930309 | Knutson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6009120 | Nobakht | Dec 1999 | A |
6167079 | Kinnunen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6233709 | Zhang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6272173 | Hatamian | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6335954 | Bottomley et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356586 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6516437 | Van Stralen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532256 | Miller | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535549 | Scott et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6690754 | Haratsch et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697441 | Bottomley et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6785342 | Isaksen et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6871208 | Guo et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6968021 | White et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985709 | Perets | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7158324 | Stein et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190288 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190721 | Garrett | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7205798 | Agarwal et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206363 | Hegde et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215716 | Smith | May 2007 | B1 |
7269205 | Wang | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7467338 | Saul | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7830854 | Sarkar et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7974230 | Talley et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8005170 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8059737 | Yang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8175186 | Wiss et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8199804 | Cheong | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8248975 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8351536 | Mazet et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8422589 | Golitschek Edler Von Elbwart et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8526523 | Eliaz | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8548072 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8548089 | Agazzi et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548097 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8553821 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559494 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559496 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8559498 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8565363 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8566687 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8571131 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8571146 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572458 | Eliaz | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8582637 | Eliaz | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8599914 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8605832 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8665941 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8665992 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8666000 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8675769 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675782 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681889 | Eliaz | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8737458 | Eliaz | May 2014 | B2 |
8744003 | Eliaz | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8781008 | Eliaz | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8804879 | Eliaz | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8811548 | Eliaz | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824572 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8824599 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8824611 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8831124 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842778 | Eliaz | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8873612 | Eliaz | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8885698 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8885786 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8891701 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8897387 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8897405 | Eliaz | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8948321 | Eliaz | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20010008542 | Wiebke et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020016938 | Starr | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020123318 | Lagarrigue | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150065 | Ponnekanti | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150184 | Hafeez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172297 | Ouchi et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030016741 | Sasson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030135809 | Kim | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030210352 | Fitzsimmons et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040037374 | Gonikberg | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040086276 | Lenosky | May 2004 | A1 |
20040120409 | Yasotharan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040142666 | Creigh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040170228 | Vadde | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174937 | Ungerboeck | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203458 | Nigra | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227570 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240578 | Thesling | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257955 | Yamanaka | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264608 | Habuka et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032472 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047517 | Georgios et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050123077 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135472 | Higashino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163252 | McCallister et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193318 | Okumura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220218 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050265470 | Kishigami et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276317 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060067396 | Christensen | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060109780 | Fechtel | May 2006 | A1 |
20060171489 | Ghosh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203943 | Scheim et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239339 | Brown et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245765 | Elahmadi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060280113 | Huo | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070092017 | Abedi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070098059 | Ives et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070098090 | Ma et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070098116 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110177 | Molander et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110191 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127608 | Scheim et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140330 | Allpress et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165578 | Yee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189404 | Baum et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213087 | Laroia et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230593 | Eliaz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258517 | Rollings et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291719 | Demirhan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002789 | Jao et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049598 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080080644 | Batruni | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080130716 | Cho et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130788 | Copeland | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159377 | Allpress et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080207143 | Skarby et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080260985 | Shirai et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090003425 | Shen et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028234 | Zhu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090075590 | Sahinoglu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086808 | Liu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122854 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090185612 | McKown | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213908 | Bottomley | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090245226 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090290620 | Tzannes et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090304127 | Massam et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323841 | Clerckx et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100002692 | Bims | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100034253 | Cohen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039100 | Sun et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100062705 | Rajkotia et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074349 | Hyllander et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100115107 | Yang | May 2010 | A1 |
20100166050 | Aue | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172309 | Forenza et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202505 | Yu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100202507 | Allpress et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208774 | Guess et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208832 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220825 | Dubuc et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100278288 | Panicker et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100284481 | Murakami et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100309796 | Khayrallah | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100329325 | Mobin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110051864 | Chalia et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110064171 | Huang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069791 | He | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074500 | Bouillet et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074506 | Kleider et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075745 | Kleider et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090986 | Kwon et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110134899 | Jones, IV et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110150064 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110164492 | Ma et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110170630 | Silverman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182329 | Wehinger | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188550 | Wajcer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110228869 | Barsoum et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110243266 | Roh | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275338 | Seshadri et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310823 | Nam et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310978 | Wu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025909 | Jo et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120027132 | Rouquette | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051464 | Kamuf et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120106617 | Jao et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120163489 | Ramakrishnan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120177138 | Chrabieh et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120207248 | Ahmed et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130028299 | Tsai | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044877 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130077563 | Kim et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130121257 | He et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130343480 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343487 | Eliaz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140036986 | Eliaz | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056387 | Asahina | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098841 | Song et al. | Apr 2014 | A2 |
20140098907 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098915 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105267 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105268 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105332 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105334 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108892 | Eliaz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140133540 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140388 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140446 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140146911 | Eliaz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140161158 | Eliaz | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140161170 | Eliaz | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140198255 | Kegasawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013030815 | Mar 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Equalization: The Correction and Analysis of Degraded Signals, White Paper, Agilent Technologies, Ransom Stephens V1.0, Aug. 15, 2005 (12 pages). |
Modulation and Coding for Linear Gaussian Channels, G. David Forney, Jr., and Gottfried Ungerboeck, IEEE Transactions of Information Theory, vol. 44, No. 6, Oct. 1998 pp. 2384-2415 (32 pages). |
Intuitive Guide to Principles of Communications, www.complextoreal.com, Inter Symbol Interference (ISI) and Root-raised Cosine (RRC) filtering, (2002), pp. 1-23 (23 pages). |
Chan, N., “Partial Response Signaling with a Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation Receiver” (1980). Open Access Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2855, (123 pages). |
The Viterbi Algorithm, Ryan, M.S. and Nudd, G.R., Department of Computer Science, Univ. of Warwick, Coventry, (1993) (17 pages). |
R. A. Gibby and J. W. Smith, “Some extensions of Nyquist's telegraph transmission theory,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 44, pp. 1487-1510, Sep. 1965. |
J. E. Mazo and H. J. Landau, “On the minimum distance problem for faster-than-Nyquist signaling,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 34, pp. 1420-1427, Nov. 1988. |
D. Hajela, “On computing the minimum distance for faster than Nyquist signaling,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 36, pp. 289-295, Mar. 1990. |
G. Ungerboeck, “Adaptive maximum-likelihood receiver for carrier modulated data-transmission systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 624-636, May 1974. |
G. D. Forney, Jr., “Maximum-likelihood sequence estimation of digital sequences in the presence of intersymbol interference,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 363-378, May 1972. |
A. Duel-Hallen and C. Heegard, “Delayed decision-feedback sequence estimation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 37, pp. 428-436, May 1989. |
M. V. Eyubog •Iu and S. U. Qureshi, “Reduced-state sequence estimation with set partitioning and decision feedback,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 36, pp. 13-20, Jan. 1988. |
W. H. Gerstacker, F. Obernosterer, R. Meyer, and J. B. Huber, “An efficient method for prefilter computation for reduced-state equalization,” Proc. of the 11th IEEE Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Commun. PIMRC, vol. 1, pp. 604-609, London, UK, Sep. 18-21, 2000. |
W. H. Gerstacker, F. Obernosterer, R. Meyer, and J. B. Huber, “On prefilter computation for reduced-state equalization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 793-800, Oct. 2002. |
Joachim Hagenauer and Peter Hoeher, “A Viterbi algorithm with soft-decision outputs and its applications,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 1989, Dallas, Texas, pp. 1680-1686,Nov. 1989. |
S. Mita, M. M Izumita, N. Doi, and Y. Eto, “Automatic equalizer for digital magnetic recording systems” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 25, pp. 3672-3674, 1987. |
E. Biglieri, E. Chiaberto, G. P. Maccone, and E. Viterbo, “Compensation of nonlinearities in high-density magnetic recording channels,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 30, pp. 5079-5086, Nov. 1994. |
W. E. Ryan and A. Gutierrez, “Performance of adaptive Volterra equalizers on nonlinear magnetic recording channels,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 31, pp. 3054-3056, Nov. 1995. |
X. Che, “Nonlinearity measurements and write precompensation studies for a PRML recording channel,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 31, pp. 3021-3026, Nov. 1995. |
O. E. Agazzi and N. Sheshadri, “On the use of tentative decisions to cancel intersymbol interference and nonlinear distortion (with application to magnetic recording channels),” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 43, pp. 394-408, Mar. 1997. |
Miao, George J., Signal Processing for Digital Communications, 2006, Artech House, pp. 375-377. |
Xiong, Fuqin. Digital Modulation Techniques, Artech House, 2006, Chapter 9, pp. 447-483. |
Faulkner, Michael, “Low-Complex ICI Cancellation for Improving Doppler Performance in OFDM Systems”, Center for Telecommunication and Microelectronics, 1-4244-0063-5/06/$2000 (c) 2006 IEEE. (5 pgs). |
Stefano Tomasin, et al. “Iterative Interference Cancellation and Channel Estimation for Mobile OFDM”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, No. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 238-245. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01866 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/001923 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/001878 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/002383 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01860 dated Mar. 21, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01970 dated Mar. 27, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/01930 dated May 15, 2014. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2013/02081 dated May 22, 2014. |
Al-Dhahir, Naofal et al., “MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalizers: Finite-Length Results” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 41, No. 4, Jul. 1995. |
Cioffi, John M. et al., “MMSE Decision-Feedback Equalizers and Coding—Park I: Equalization Results” IEEE Transactions onCommunications, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 1995. |
Eyuboglu, M. Vedat et al., “Reduced-State Sequence Estimation with Set Partitioning and Decision Feedback” IEEE Transactions onCommunications, vol. 36, No. 1, Jan. 1988. |