Progressive constriction of the central canal within the spinal column is a predictable consequence of aging. As the spinal canal narrows, the nerve elements that reside within it become progressively more crowded. Eventually, the canal dimensions become sufficiently small so as to significantly compress the nerve elements and produce pain, weakness, sensory changes, clumsiness and other manifestation of nervous system dysfunction.
Constriction of the canal within the lumbar spine is termed lumbar stenosis. This condition is common in the elderly and causes a significant proportion of the low back pain, lower extremity pain, lower extremity weakness, limitation of mobility and the high disability rates that afflict this age group. With aging and spinal degeneration, displacement of the vertebral bones in the horizontal may occur and the condition is termed Sponylolisthesis. Spondylolisthesis exacerbates the extent of nerve compression within the spinal canal since misalignment of the vertebral bones will further reduce the size of the spinal canal.
Relief for the compressed nerves can be achieved by the surgical removal of the bone and ligamentous structures that constrict the spinal canal. However, decompression of the spinal canal can further weaken the facet joints and increase the possibility of additional aberrant vertebral movement in the horizontal plane. Thus, decompression can worsen the extent of spondylolisthesis or produce spondylolisthesis in an otherwise normally aligned functional spinal unit (FSU). After decompression, surgeons will commonly fuse and immobilize the adjacent spinal bones in order to prevent the development of post-operative vertebral misalignment and spondylolisthesis.
Since fusion will often place additional load on the adjacent spinal segments and hasten degeneration of those levels, it is of significant clinical interest to develop an orthopedic implant that would preventing aberrant movement between adjacent vertebral bones while permitting decompression of the nerve elements without concurrent fusion.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,011,484, 5,092,866, 5,180,393, 5,387,213, 5,540,688, 5,562,737, 5,672,175, 5,725,582, 5,961,516, 5,984,923, 6,296,643, 6,248,106, 6,645,207, 6,682,530, 6,966,910, 2004/0236329, 2005/0171543, 2005/0177156 and others have disclosed numerous devices for the dynamic stabilization of the spine. As shown in these patents, current dynamic stabilization devices are large, multi-segmental spring-based devices that are placed using traditional surgical approaches to the vertebral column. Further, clinical experience with these devices has produced mechanical failure because of rod breakage in multiple systems.
Disclosed are novel dynamic rod systems and methods that provide robust fixation and a reliable resistor to motion. A first end of a movable orthopedic implant is attached onto a first vertebral bone of a functional spinal unit and a second end onto a second vertebral bone of a functional spinal unit. The implant has a longitudinal axis and permits movement of the attached vertebral bones along that longitudinal axis. The device may contain a member that is adapted to resist movement wherein longitudinal movement of a first device member relative to a second device member produces rotational movement about the long axis the device within the resisting member. In an embodiment, a spinal grove is used to convert the longitudinal movement of the device members and the rotational movement of the resistor. There is also provided resistance to longitudinal movement in either direction using a single resistor to motion, wherein the resistor is positioned outside of the attachments points of the device to the vertebral bones. This provides maximal strength of the device.
Other features and advantages should be apparent from the following description of various embodiments, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the disclosed devices and methods.
In order to promote an understanding of the principals of the invention, reference is made to the drawings and the embodiments illustrated therein. Nevertheless, it will be understood that the drawings are illustrative and no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated embodiments, and any such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated herein are contemplated as would normally occur to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Vertebral bone 802 contains an anteriorly-placed vertebral body 804, a centrally placed spinal canal and 806 and posteriorly-placed lamina 808. The pedicle (810) segments of vertebral bone 802 form the lateral aspect of the spinal canal and connect the laminas 808 to the vertebral body 804. The spinal canal contains neural structures such as the spinal cord and/or nerves. A midline protrusion termed the spinous process (SP) extends posteriorly from the medial aspect of laminas 808. A protrusion extends laterally from each side of the posterior aspect of the vertebral bone and is termed the transverse process (TP). A right transverse process (RTP) extends to the right and a left transverse process (LTP) extends to the left. A superior protrusion extends superiorly above the lamina on each side of the vertebral midline and is termed the superior articulating process (SAP). An inferior protrusion extends inferiorly below the lamina on each side of the vertebral midline and is termed the inferior articulating process (IAP). Note that the posterior aspect of the pedicle can be accessed at an indentation 811 in the vertebral bone between the lateral aspect of the SAP and the medial aspect of the transverse process (TP). In surgery, it is common practice to anchor a bone fastener into the pedicle portion of a vertebral bone by inserting the fastener through indentation 811 and into the underlying pedicle.
The preceding illustrations and definitions of anatomical structures are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. They are illustrated in more detail in Atlas of Human Anatomy, by Frank Netter, third edition, Icon Learning Systems, Teterboro, N.J. The text is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In the functional spinal unit, a substantial portion (up to 80%) of the vertical load is borne by the intervertebral disc and the anterior column. (The term “vertical load” refers to the load transmitted in the vertical plane through the erect human spine. The “anterior column” is used here to designate that portion of the vertebral body and/or FSU that is situated anterior to the posterior longitudinal ligament and includes the posterior longitudinal ligament. Thus, its use in this application encompasses both the anterior and middle column of Denis. See The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. By Denis, F. Spine 1983 November-December; 8(8):817-31. The article is incorporated by reference in its entirety.) Conversely, a substantial portion of load transmitted through the functional spine unit in the horizontal plane is borne by the facet joint and the posterior column. (The “posterior column” is used here to designate that portion of the vertebral body and/or FSU that is situated posterior to the posterior longitudinal ligament.)
Generally, the forces acting in the horizontal plane are aligned to cause an anterior displacement of the superior vertebral body relative to the inferior vertebral body of a functional spinal unit. These forces are counteracted by the facet joints which are formed by the abutment surfaces of the IAP of the superior vertebral bone and the SAP of the inferior bone.
In a healthy spine functioning within physiological parameters, the two facet joints of an FSU collectively function to prevent aberrant relative movement of the vertebral bones in the horizontal plane. With aging and spinal degeneration, displacement of the vertebral bones in the horizontal may occur and the condition is termed Sponylolisthesis.
A spondylolisthesis can be anterior, as shown in
With degeneration of the spine, constriction of the spinal canal (spinal stenosis) and impingement of the contained nerve elements frequently occurs and is termed spinal stenosis. Spondylolisthesis exacerbates the extent of nerve compression within the spinal canal since misalignment of bone within the horizontal plane will further reduce the size of the spinal canal. Relief for the compressed nerves can be achieved by the surgical removal of the bone and ligamentous structures that constrict the spinal canal. However, decompression of the spinal canal can further weaken the facet joints and increase the possibility of additional aberrant vertebral movement in the horizontal plane and worsen the extent of spondylolisthesis or produce spondylolisthesis in an otherwise normally aligned FSU. After decompression, surgeons will commonly fuse and immobilize the adjacent spinal bones in order to prevent the development of post-operative vertebral misalignment and spondylolisthesis.
It is a goal of the present disclosure to attach a first end of a movable orthopedic implant device onto a first vertebral bone of a functional spinal unit and a second end onto a second vertebral bone of a functional spinal unit. The device has a longitudinal axis and permits movement of the attached vertebral bones along that longitudinal axis. The device may contain a member that is adapted to resist movement wherein longitudinal movement of a first device member relative to a second device member produces rotational movement about the long axis the device within the resisting member. In an embodiment, a spinal grove is used to convert the longitudinal movement of the device members and the rotational movement of the resistor. It is an additional goal of the current invention to provide resistance to longitudinal movement in either direction using a single resistor to motion, wherein the resistor is positioned outside of the attachments points of the device to the vertebral bones. This would provide maximal strength of the device.
Collar 512 is shown in
With reference to
As shown in
A second hollow cylindrical member which is comprised of an outer surface with a defined radius from a longitudinal central axis, an inner surface with a defined radius from a longitudinal central axis, a defined thickness and defined internal cavity that is contained within the inner surface. At least one cylindrical tab extends from one end of said member. Preferably, but not necessarily, the first and second cylindrical members may be identical.
As shown in
At least one flexible element 307 connects the inner surface of the tab member 305 of the first member 303 with the inner surface of the second member 303 and at least one flexible element connects the inner surface of the tab member 305 of the second member with the inner surface of the first member 303 so that said first and second members 303 may smoothly rotate relative to one another about a central longitudinal axis. The elements 307 are joined with the inner surfaces of members 303 and tabs 305 using any method that is known in the art to join these members—including welding and the like.
The device is commercially available from the Riverhawk company of New Hartford, N.Y. 13413. The web site http://www.flexpivots.com describes the device in detail and the totality of the information contained within the web site is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Further, prior disclosures of similar flexible pivot devices have been made in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,620,169, 6,146,044 and 6,666,612. The disclosure of each of these patents is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As previously illustrated, pivot member 515 is housed within an end of rod 502. With the longitudinal movement of collar 512 along rod 502 (that is, movement of collar 512 in the direction of the long axis of the rod 502), the interaction of cylindrical protrusion 5032 of rod 502 and straight cut-out 5128 of collar 512 prevent rotational movement of the collar relative to the long axis of the rod 502. However, since spherical protrusion 5036 is attached to the distal aspect of the pivot member 515 and retained within helical cutout 5132 of the distal aspect of collar 512, the longitudinal movement of collar 512 necessarily produces a rotational movement of the distal aspect of the pivot member 515 relative to the proximal aspect of pivot member 515 (which is fixed relative to the rod 502). In this way, longitudinal movement of collar 512 relative to rod 502 necessarily produces the rotational movement of the first and second members of the axially aligned hollow cylindrical member 303 of pivot member 515. The flat crossed slats of pivot member 515 will oppose rotational movement of the axially aligned hollow cylindrical members and resist the longitudinal movement of the collar 512 relative to rod 502. Thus, the pivot member 515 functions as a rotational resistor to longitudinal movement of the collar and rod. Animations of the moving pivot member 515 are shown on the web site http://www.flexpivots.com and all animations, drawings and specifications of the device are hereby incorporated by reference in they're entirety. Further, pivot members of three or more axially aligned hollow cylindrical members are also illustrated on site and sold by the Riverhawk Company as “double ended pivot bearings”. While the preceding invention is illustrated using a pivot member containing only two axially aligned hollow cylindrical members (sold by the Riverhawk Company as “cantilevered (single ended) pivot bearing), it is contemplated and fully understood that one of ordinary skill in the art can alternatively employ the pivot members of three or more segments to accomplish the disclosed invention. That is, any of the pivot bearings may be used to resist the longitudinal movement of collar 512 relative to rod 502 when longitudinal movement of collar 512 relative to 502 is configured to produce forcible rotation of at least one pivot bearing member relative to another pivot bearing member.
With reference to identical sectional views of
The extent of resistance to movement of collar 512 relative to rod 502 may be varied in multiple ways. In a first embodiment, resistance may be varied by modifying the flexible elements 307 of the pivot member 515, wherein the size, configuration, number, orientation, thickness or material of manufacture of the elements 307 may be changed. By way of example, shape memory alloys and/or less malleable materials (such as, for example, titanium) may be used to manufacture element 307 and will endow the device with widely varied resistance properties. Further, for any given pivot member 515, the resistance profile may be changed by altering the frictional contact between collar 512 and rod 502 or changing the shape of full thickness channel 5132 of collar 512. For example,
The disclosed devices or any of their components can be made of any biologically adaptable or compatible materials. Materials considered acceptable for biological implantation are well known and include, but are not limited to, stainless steel, titanium, tantalum, combination metallic alloys, various plastics, resins, ceramics, biologically absorbable materials and the like. Any components may be also coated/made with nanotube materials to further impart unique mechanical or biological properties. In addition, any components may be also coated/made with osteo-conductive (such as deminerized bone matrix, hydroxyapatite, and the like) and/or osteo-inductive (such as Transforming Growth Factor “TGF-B,” Platelet-Derived Growth Factor “PDGF,” Bone-Morphogenic Protein “BMP,” and the like) bio-active materials that promote bone formation. Further, any surface may be made with a porous ingrowth surface (such as titanium wire mesh, plasma-sprayed titanium, tantalum, porous CoCr, and the like), provided with a bioactive coating, made using tantalum, and/or helical rosette carbon nanotubes (or other carbon nanotube-based coating) in order to promote bone in-growth or establish a mineralized connection between the bone and the implant, and reduce the likelihood of implant loosening. Lastly, any disclosed devices or any of its components can also be entirely or partially made of a shape memory material or other deformable/malleable material.
Although embodiments of various methods and devices are described herein in detail with reference to certain versions, it should be appreciated that other versions, embodiments, methods of use, and combinations thereof are also possible. Therefore the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.
This application claims priority of co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/192,706, filed Sep. 18, 2008, and co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/212,408, filed Apr. 10, 2009. Priority of the aforementioned filing dates is hereby claimed. The disclosure of each Provisional patent Application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61192706 | Sep 2008 | US | |
61212408 | Apr 2009 | US |