This invention generally relates to the operational mechanics of fins that are attached to watercraft for control. Specifically, this invention relates to mechanical means to implement removable fins that enable better application of their operational mechanics and more specifically, it relates to means to implement dynamically a better alignment of fins to reduce drag, enable thrust and maintain control.
Conventional surfboard fins are installed aiming forward towards the front end. They are installed in a symmetrical arrangement with respect to the center line. The preferred arrangement nowadays include three fins. When the arrangement of fins include a fin at the center, the center fin is generally installed closest to the rear end and aligned exactly with the center line while the reminder fins are placed further ahead symmetrically from the center fin. There are two angles in connection with fins that are installed symmetrically away from the centerline. One that measures the alignment of the fin on a plane that contains the surfboard and one that measures the angle of the plane containing the fin with respect to the plane containing the surfboard. The former, here referred to as the toe angle, in its nowadays preferred arrangement aligns the angle of attack of the fins in a direction that is inclined slightly inward towards the center line, the latter, here referred to as the tilt angle, tilts the fin slightly outward away from the center line and is measured as a deviation from the 90 degree position, generally about 4 degrees.
The development of surfboard design and surfboard fins for the subject matter has been by trial and error along with the availability of new materials and technologies. The angle and alignment of fins mentioned above is thus the result of that process. Notably, three fins surfboards, since their first introduction in 1981 by Simon Anderson implemented both angles in approximately the same arrangements as used today. It thus appeared intuitively logical at the time and they appear logical at this time. Generally surfboard shapers use preferred angles and in some very rare cases, surfboard riders request their preferred angles in deviations of no more than a few degrees.
Fins, as installed on surfboards satisfy intuition by way of the connection with live creatures such as sharks and dolphins, however, wave riding is unique. No creature has ever evolved to permanently navigate sideways an incoming flow as surfboards do. Planing on a horizontal plane between water and air is also unique to surface watercraft.
Fins can be fixed to the surfboard permanently or be fixed by way of a built in attachment system commonly referred to as fin box. Generally, most previous art involve the development of unique means to attach the fin to the surfboard without any adjustment of the angles which are set in the box or the fin itself during construction of the surfboard such as those in U.S. Pat. No. 8,465,334 to Hort et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,695,662 to Kelley as illustrative examples. In some instances the toe angle is adjusted by no more than a few degrees and the fin is fixed at that angle without ability to change during wave riding such as those in U. S. Pre-Grant Pub. No. 2006/0035543 to English and Belitz and U.S. Pat. No. 5,567,190 to Oates as illustrative examples of those instances. In other instances the tilt angle of the fin can be adjusted such as those in U. S. Pre-Grant Pub. No. 2004/0248482 to Larkin and U. S. Pre-Grant Pub. No. 2004/0235374 to Garcia as illustrative examples. U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,940 to Pouchkarev describes inner workings of movable fins with a functionality that involves at least one pair of non removable fins and the watercraft itself. U. S. Pre-Grant Pub. No. 2016/0090169 to Jean Francois Iglesias have sought to provide flexibility to the fins for variation of their angle of attack.
The preferred approach nowadays is removable fins in fixed angles via a fin box. Removable fins incorporate numerous sought advantages such as ease of transport and the ability to use different fins for different wave conditions.
The direction of travel of surfboards is in general sideways with respect to the direction of the motion of waves. The surfboard is always planing or gliding sideways to counteract forces that are pushing it towards the direction of the wave, however surfboards can still glide sideways without fins. The fins increase maneuverability and control.
Directional fins, such as those on surfboards are installed to reduced drag to the minimum by having their angle of attack in the same direction of the motion. Small variations of their angle with respect to the incoming flow induce forces that attempt to re-align the fins with the flow so changing the direction of the water craft they are attached to. As surfboards are almost permanently gliding sideways, the alignment of the fins should be such to nearly match the direction of the glide to reduce drag.
Maneuvers in surfing consist on turns that are at least 90 degrees and most often 180 degrees. This is because the surfer is at all times avoiding to glide straight down the direction of the wave, except when it is strictly necessary or when is forced to do so by the section he is navigating. In a situation in which the surfer is gliding straight down the maneuver sought is at least 90 degrees to engage the face of the wave for what he turns the nose sharply to approach the 90 degrees angle with respect to the direction of the wave thus achieving the sought glide sideways as the wave lift the surfboard along the rail and continue to advance.
In doing the 90 degrees turn to reach the sough direction, the angle of attack of the fins is slanted sharply almost the same 90 degrees, sideways against the incoming flow so inducing excessive drag in the original direction rather than a smooth transition without loosing speed. The slant angle is always excessive for the maneuvers sought when turning the board.
To reduce the slant angle with respect to flow sideways beneath the surfboard, the slant angle needs to be reduced to reduce drag and enable smooth tran-sitions. For a surfboard riding the face of the wave to the right side of the wave by effectively aiming a direction that is approximately 45 degrees to the right with respect to the direction of the wave, vector analysis indicate that the resulting flow velocity is to the rear-right of the surfboard some rear-10 degrees-right (Re10Ri) to Re20Ri with respect to the direction of the center line of the surfboard. Vector analysis indicate that this angle is greater for greater suction velocities, the suction velocity being the velocity at which the wave drains water from its base to pitch it about its crest which is notoriously high in some waves such as those in Teahupoo, Tahiti or Skeleton Bay in Namibia.
Surfboards will plane to the right or left without fins and do so in virtue of their shape. A permanent slant angle will be a slight deviation from its neutral, in the case at hand a deviation from the Re10Ri to Re20Ri neutral position, tail wise for all fins. In the case at hand, when the surfboard is planing down to the right of the wave (roughly aligned at some 45 degrees to the right), maneuvers are accomplished by turning the surfboard to the left or right from that 45 degrees direction. When the surfboard is turned to the left of that direction, it is planing down the face of the wave for which the fins are not needed so that are better aligned in a neutral direction with its angle of attack aligned with the incoming flow, whereas planing up the face is by turning the surfboard to the right for which the fins at an adequate slant angle with respect to the incoming sideways flow, are needed for greater responsiveness but yet minimize drag to keep the speed. Angles as high as 45 degrees to the right and left appear to meet mechanics for forward thrust when some conditions are met.
It can be seen that fins that are attached on fixed positions lack recognition of the unique dynamics of the sideways flow velocity beneath surfboards and watercraft relying greatly on their shape for direction. As such fins that are aligned exactly or very close to the direction the centerline aims, as in all prior art, induce unnecessary drag because their angle of attack is excessively slanted or outright side-ways with respect to the motion of the surfboard. While a degree of a slanted angle must be relied upon by the surfer, the optimum angle reducing the drag to the maximum and maintaining the desire responsiveness will require finer tunning than any available system can provide. On the other hand because of the fact that the center fin cannot be adjusted in any system the problem of the excessively slanted angle of attack is always present.
While the ability of fins to remain neutral is seen to be advantageous for the dynamics of wave riding, it is also useful for water craft in general, specially for those that greatly rely on their shape for direction.
What is needed is removable surfboard fins for which the trailing edge can swing to some degree about an axis near the leading edge of the fin thus enabling a degree of freedom of fin engagement. The degrees of freedom of fin engagement need to be such to allow the fin to naturally keep a neutral position when gliding down the face and a near neutral position when gliding left or right down the face of the wave. The neutral position being that in which the angle of attack of the fin is aligned exactly opposite to the flow velocity vector. The magnitude of the swing should be changeable and such to reach a stop position that approach the direction of the sideways flow but is slightly slanted to permit adequate response to the commanding inputs from the operator of the craft or the surfer. The system should be such to allow ease of change of the angle of freedom, easy installation of the fin on the surfboard, easy maintenance and ease on changing fin types for different wave conditions.
It would be advantageous to provide a system that overcomes at least some of the drawbacks of the prior art.
It is the object of this invention to reduce shortcomings and deficiencies of fins installed and/or enabled for operation in fixed directions by:
To meet the objects of this invention, the operational principles of fins are implemented via the inner workings and components of rotary bearings.
Correspondingly, the present invention sets out to provide an assembly of parts for a rotary bearing to enable a fin having a journal base or to which fins can be attached, enabled to freely or partially rotate upon the action of fluid forces that naturally act on water crafts. In the key aspect of partial rotation of fins in this invention, the magnitude of the angle of free partial rotation can be set or disabled via changeable inserts. Fin directions can also be set at fixed angles via changeable inserts so enabling any fixed alignment angle.
In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment, there is provided a dynamic fin alignment system comprising: a bearing housing for attachment to a watercraft, the bearing housing having a housing bore with means for releasably securing a rotary bearing, the bearing housing having an interior base surface with a recessed slot defined therein, the recessed slot configured to releasably secure a correspondingly shaped changeable insert; a rotary bearing for being releasably secured into said bearing housing and having at least one race and a bearing bore coaxial with said housing bore when the dynamic fin alignment system is in an assembled condition; an axially symmetric body having a journal for cooperating with the at least one race to support rotation of the axially symmetric body relative to the rotary bearing; a fin extending from a first side of the axially symmetric body when the dynamic fin alignment system is in the assembled condition; a shear key extending from a second side of the axially symmetric body that is opposite the first side; and a plurality of said changeable inserts for being disposed, one at a time, within the recessed slot of the bearing housing, each changeable insert having a keyway for receiving the shear key when the dynamic fin alignment system is in the assembled condition.
In accordance with an aspect of at least one embodiment, there is provided a fin assembly comprising: a fin having a root body; a rotary bearing securable to a bearing housing, the rotary bearing having a bearing surface defining at least one race and the rotary bearing having a bearing bore; and a rotatable, axially symmetric disk base having a journal portion for cooperating with the at least one race to support rotation of the axially symmetric body relative to the rotary bearing, and having a slot extending across a width of the axially symmetric disk base for slidingly receiving the root body therein to secure the fin to the axially symmetric disk base.
For a more complete understanding of the invention, reference is made to the following description and accompanying drawings, in which:
The exploded-view drawing in
The bottom front end [4] of the fin is in material connection with a body having the geometry of a stack of two coaxial disks which are in turn coaxial with the axis of rotation [1], a disk base [5] with a disk journal [6] at its underside which are to bear in a bearing comprising a first piece [7] and a second piece [8] fitted with alignment pins [9] and receiver holes [10] or the like to accurately align its first piece [7] and its second piece [8] together, the trailing portion of the fin's bottom end [11] extending closely and parallel to the under-side of the watercraft (not shown). The view of the entire fin [3] and its disk base [5] are also shown in smaller scale on the top left side of
The bearing ([7] and [8]), has an exterior side face [13] and an underside face [14] that extend radially from its bore [15] to an outer rim [16] dimensionally fit to meet the bore [17] of a bearing housing [18], the bearing's underside face [14] having means to be releasably secured to the bore [17] of the bearing housing [18] which in this embodiment consists of a thread connection [19] drivable with a hard edge on notches [20], the exterior side face [13] of the bearing flush with the lami-nation finish (not shown).
The bearing housing [18] forms a coaxial cylindrical hull at the underside of the lamination (not shown) of the watercraft with its bore [17] facing upward to receive the bearing ([7] and [8]) and having exterior side faces [21] and interior side faces [22], the exterior side [21] may have a framework to facilitate interlocking engagement thereof with an adhesive material for affixing the fin box to the watercraft, which in this embodiment consists on its exterior side faces [21], the bearing housing's [18] interior side face facing upward [22] having a cir-cular protrusion [23] dimensionally fit to meet the underside of the disk journal [24] and having an elongated circular slot [25] between its axis [1] and its rim [26] shaped to receive a correspondingly shaped insert [27], the slot being axisymmetric about a circular axis [28] at its center which is concentric with the axis of rotation [1], the slot extending circularly along the circular axis [28] a finite distance and having means to releasably secure the correspondingly shaped insert [27], which in this embodiment consists of a protrusion [29] along the slot's side walls to engage a correspondingly shaped cavity [30] when the insert [27] is pressed into the circular slot [25] which may extend into means to facilitate removal, which in this embodiment consists of notches [31] to manually exert a prying force to a slanted undercut [32] on the insert [27] for removal.
The insert [27] having an elongated circular keyway [33] axisymmetric about the circular axis [28] of the circular slot [25], the keyway [33] being dimen-sionally fit to radially and circularly loosely receive a shear key [34] correspondingly protruding from the underside of the disk journal [24] into the center of the keyway [33].
The shear key [34] being preferably in cross section of a circular segment [35] shape to withstand the lateral force induced by rotational forces acting upon the fin and when moving side to side and allowing the movement of water from side to side to prevent the build up of pressure. Another preferred embodiment of the shear key may radially fit tight within the keyway allowing the build up of pressure for a slow transition between the initial time of the turn and the final position of the fin at the stop point in the insert.
The arrangement in
The exemplary embodiment in
The angle of freedom [43] of fins enabled on the surfboard by other sets of three inserts is shown above, below and to the right in the figure. It can be seen on the right side of
The set of inserts in
The alignment or range of alignments of one fin set by an insert is given on the trailing side in reference to a line parallel to the center line, further referred to as center line, passing through the center of rotation of the fin. The scheme can be applied to fixed fins or for fins having a degree of freedom, further referred to as freedom, for which the center line is within the range of the angles swept by the fin. The fin can be Fixed or have Symmetric or Asymmetric sweep, Left or Right correspondingly denoted in the scheme using the letters F, S, A, L and R. The term “Simon Anderson” (SA) is applicable for fixed alignments defined with a single toe angle in its nowadays preferred range of 3 to 5 degrees. A slash/is used as a separator and a prefix in the form of yx denoting the number of fins y on the surfboard when required.
The order of the letters and numbers in the following order: 3×A20L/10R for 3 fins having 20+10=30 degrees freedom, asymmetric sweep, 20 degrees left and 10 to the right. Correspondingly, a symmetric 30 degrees freedom insert is labeled S30, a 30 degrees fixed to the left fin is labeled F 30L as examples. SA4 in the scheme denotes intrinsically 3 inserts to fix 3 fins with angles correspondingly to meet the known arrangement of fins having a 4 degrees toe angle.
In Figure
It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained and, because certain changes may be made in carrying out the above method and in the construction(s) set forth without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall there between.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2020/051751 | 12/18/2020 | WO |