This invention relates generally to securement devices and, more particularly, to a flexible rod or device along a portion thereof that is capable of flexibly securing vertebrae together.
The lumbar spine absorbs a remarkable amount of stress and motion during normal activity. For the majority of the population, the healing response of the body is able to stay ahead of the cumulative effects of injury, wear, and aging, and yet still maintain stability with reasonable function. In some cases, however, the trauma or stress exceeds the ability of the body to heal, leading to local breakdown and excessive wear, and frequently also leads to local instability. Accordingly, degenerative change with age superimposed on baseline anatomy in the lumbar spine leads to problems including instability, pain and neurologic compromise in some patients. In some cases, the local anatomy may not provide the same protection to the motion segment, thereby aggravating this breakdown. Although rehabilitation, conditioning, the limitation of stress, and time to recover are effective treatments for most patients, there is a significant failure rate with persistent pain, disability and potential neurologic deficit.
Referring now to
The intervertebral joint is a complex structure comprising an intervertebral disc anteriorly, and paired zygapophyseal joints posteriorly. The disc functions as an elastic support and connection between the vertebra, and allows for flexion and extension of the spine, as well as limited rotation and translation. The zygapophyseal joints and associated anatomy allow for significant flexion and extension while providing constraints in translation and rotation.
The primary bending motion in the lumbar spine is flexion and extension in an anterior/posterior plane. This occurs in the range approximating 10-15 degrees of flexion and extension. In a young or normal lumbar spine, this motion occurs about an axis in the mid to posterior portion of the disc. This is associated with a distraction or subluxation of the facet joints or posterior elements of 10-15 mm. This occurs not about a pure axis, but about a neutral zone, or a centroid of rotation associated with the lumbar disc. The normal elasticity of the disc, joints and ligaments, and the degree of play or freedom associated with these joints, as well as the nature of the loads applied to the spine contribute to the size of this region of rotation. In some cases, the recurrent loads and motion on the disc and associated trauma to disc and motion segment exceed the natural rate of healing or repair of the body. In this situation, there is breakdown in the motion segment associated with loss of the normal axis of rotation. As increasing subluxation occurs with segmental motion, there is a dramatic shift in the axis of rotation with displacement occurring within the disc space or frequently to some point outside of the disc. Therefore, in the situation of a failing motion segment, there is breakdown in the centroid of rotation with associated translation of the vertebral segments. This translation is allowed by both breakdown occurring in the disc and instability associated with both wear and degeneration of the zygapophyseal joints. The underlying anatomy of the motion segment and joints allows for significantly greater stress on the disc and contributes to degeneration both in the disc and joints.
Traditionally, surgical treatment has been directed at treating neural compromise, or if the pain, instability, or risk of instability is considered sufficient, a segmental fusion has been considered. More recently, stabilization procedures have been tried over the past several years including artificial discs and ligaments and elastomeric constructs to protect the spine. Arthroplasty techniques to maximize function and reduce the dynamic effects on adjacent segments are a more recent approach with less follow-up as to long-term results. A challenge in designing such a system is constraining motion in a normal physiologic range.
Spinal fusion surgery is a method of fusing at least two mobile segments of the spine to knit them together as one unit and eliminate motion between the segments. Current spinal fixation systems offer several drawbacks. Rigid fusion constructs do not allow relative movement between the vertebrae that are fused using a construct comprising a pedicle screw, connector mechanism, and rigid rod. Furthermore, rigid implants are known to create significant amounts of stress on the components of the construct, including the pedicle screws and the rod, as well as the bone structure itself. These stresses may even cause the rigid rod to break. In addition, the stresses transferred to the pedicle screws may cause the screws to loosen or even dislodge from the vertebrae, thereby causing additional bone damage.
Artificial discs may replace a failing disc and approximate a normal centroid or axis of rotation; however, placement of such a device is technically demanding and replaces the normal disc with a mechanical replacement with uncertain long-term results. The artificial disc will be subject to wear without the healing potential of the body to heal itself.
It is also desirable with some patients to have a spinal implant system that allows the vertebral column to settle naturally under the weight of the human body. Human bone heals more readily under some pressure. In a rigid spinal implant system, the patient's spinal column may be unnaturally held apart by the structure of the implant. It is possible that this stretching of the vertebrae, in relation to one another, results in delayed or incomplete healing of the bone.
Posterior devices placed with pedicle fixation may provide some stabilization, however, the natural motion of such devices does not necessarily act to mimic normal physiology. In a healthy lumbar spine the axis of rotation or neutral area for motion is situated near the inferior posterior third of the lumbar disc. A desirable artificial system would closely approximate physiologic motion. However, to date, posterior systems have failed to address these concerns.
Several existing patents disclose fusion devices. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,415,661 discloses a device that includes a curvilinear rod such that the implant supposedly restores normal biomechanical function to the vertebrae of the spine receiving the implant. However, the '661 patent does not disclose a device having structure other than a curvilinear shape that has a radius of curvature of between 0 to 180 degrees. In addition, the '661 patent does not disclose the concept of providing an anteriorly projected pivot point that models the natural articulation of the subject vertebrae by using a structure that provides a virtual rotation zone substantially identical to the rotation zone provided by the patient's vertebrae. In addition, as seen in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,293,949 also discloses a spinal stabilization device intended for use along the cervical vertebrae, and intended to be installed along the anterior side of the vertebrae.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,440,169 discloses a device that attaches to the spinous processes of two vertebrae and has a leaf spring that allows the device to compress and then recover spontaneously after the stress has ceased. However, the '169 patent does not address a construct that includes an anteriorly projected pivot point that allows the vertebrae to articulate when the spine undergoes flexion.
In view of the above, there is a long felt but unsolved need for a method and system that avoids the above-mentioned deficiencies of the prior art and that provides an effective system that is relatively simple to employ and requires minimal displacement or removal of bodily tissue.
The present invention provides a device that can be implanted and that provides for a specified amount of forward bending motion, thereby allowing anterior sagittal rotation between the vertebrae that receive the implant. Reference is hereby made for the incorporation of the conventional descriptive terms of motion and other content presented in Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum by Nikolai Bogduk, third edition, published by Churchill Livingstone, 1999. Although anterior sagittal rotation or flexion between vertebrae is normal, significant anterior sagittal translation or sliding motion between vertebrae is not. Thus, by allowing some amount of rotational motion while protecting against translation, the patient's condition or injury can be protected, thus promoting the healing process, while subsequently providing some ability to rotate one vertebra relative to an adjacent vertebra, thereby allowing for improved spinal motion following surgery and recovery. Accordingly, as described herein, various implants, including a number of rod configurations having flexible portions are presented that provide a device having the ability to elongate and bend. Thus, it is a first aspect of the present invention to provide a device that elongates, and a second aspect of the present invention to provide a device that bends. More particularly, the present invention is a dynamic fixation device that includes a flexible rod portion, wherein the flexible rod portion can include a geometric shape and/or a hinge portion. These dynamic fixation devices are constructed of a material of an appropriate size, geometry, and having mechanical properties such that they bend, thus allowing the vertebrae associated with the implant to rotate relative to one another, similar to the movement of a natural spine.
A dynamic fixation device is a quasi-flexible, semi-rigid fixation construct that allows some measure of motion between the vertebrae attached to the dynamic fixation device. Dynamic fixation of the lumbar spine provides means of protecting lumbar structures and allows for healing without proceeding to a lumbar arthrodesis. The constraints on such a system are in some ways different than for a rigid or near rigid construct, such as that used for fusion.
At the present time, pedicle fixation is an accepted method of fixing to the spine. In the situation of a lumbar fusion, a relatively rigid construct is appropriate to stabilize the spine and allow healing of the bony structures. In the situation of providing protection to the lumbar structures, a flexible system is appropriate to limit but not stop the motion of lumbar elements. The flexible elements in such a system need to accomplish several objectives. The primary objective is to allow physiologic motion of the spine, while protecting against excessive or non-physiologic movement. A secondary consideration is to protect the pedicle fixation from undue stress that could loosen the fixation at its bony interface.
The normal instantaneous axis of rotation of the lumbar spine occurs typically near the lower posterior third of the disc. Conventional pedicle fixation of the spine typically places the fixation rod or plate at the dorsal aspect of the apophyseal joint or posterior to the joint. Therefore, it is appropriate to consider a construct that effectively shifts this rotation point anteriorly toward the physiologic axis.
A group of geometries exist, which if applied to a posterior device, will constrain the subluxation of the segment and maintain the rotation in or close to the normal zone or axis of rotation. The indication for use is to constrain the stresses and motion within a range which will allow the body's normal healing response to maintain adequate competence in the motion segment to avoid development of instability or neurologic deficit and minimize pain or arthritis. The important features allow for maintenance of physiologic motion without the abnormal subluxation or translation that are associated with a degenerating disc and contribute to further degeneration. Thus, it is a separate aspect of the invention to provide a construct that limits excessive subluxation or translation.
Although the motion is complex related to the range of stresses which may be applied, it is nonetheless possible to provide a device so that while in compression, movement is axial or accompanied by slight dorsal translation, and that while in flexion allows both separation of posterior elements and slight ventral translation allowing rotation about the posterior portion of the disc.
Accordingly, it is an aspect of the present invention to provide a device that allows for some limited motion, thereby decreasing the stresses placed on the various component parts of the implant, as well as the affected vertebrae. It is a further aspect of the present invention to provide a device whose motion is designed to model the bending motion of the spine. Several separate embodiments of the present invention accomplish such tasks.
It is a separate aspect of the present invention to provide a construct that geometrically accommodates the human spinal anatomy, while providing a structural member that provides an anteriorly projected zone of rotation.
In a first embodiment, an implantable elastomeric material may be used, or a surgically implantable alloy can be used that includes a geometric shape having a plurality of arms (e.g., four arms) with an interior open region between the arms. In one example of this embodiment, the geometric shape is rectangular, such that the arms of the geometric shape are situated at 90 degree angles relative to each other. Upon deformation due to flexion of the spine, the geometric shape deforms, and the 90 degree angles between the arms change such that the geometric shape expands and becomes a parallelogram. In a separate aspect of the invention, the convergence segments of the arms include partially circular corners. Alternatively, the partially circular corners may be of a different shape, such as partially triangular. In a separate aspect of this embodiment, the inside surface of the interior sidewalls of the arms of the geometric shape have an interior surface that is at an angle of 90 degrees relative to a planar surface of the geometric shape. Attached to the exterior of the geometric shape near two opposing corners are two rod arms. The rod arms allow the device to be connected to connectors, which interconnect the device to pedicle screws. In a separate aspect of this embodiment, each rod arm may be situated at different angles and locations along the geometric shape, thereby influencing the location of the projected pivot point in the plane of the geometric shape upon flexion of the spine.
In yet a separate embodiment, a dynamic fixation device utilizes at least two adjacent geometric shapes that act in an accordion manner; however, this embodiment serves to project the effective pivot point anterior relative to the device. Therefore, the projected pivot point mimics the natural rotational axis of the vertebrae to which the device is attached. In a modification of this embodiment, more than two adjacent geometric shapes are combined to form the flexible portion of the device. One aspect of this embodiment and its modification is that smaller geometric shapes may be used with the addition of more geometric shapes. Consequently, a smaller profile dynamic fixation device can be provided, while at the same time having an effective pivot point that is projected anteriorly a sufficient distance to mimic the natural rotational axis of the vertebrae to which the device is attached.
In yet a separate embodiment, a dynamic fixation device is provided that includes a modified geometric shape that serves as the flexible portion of the device. The modified geometric shape incorporates an opening or void space that allows the device to elongate and deform to accommodate flexion of the spine.
In a yet a separate embodiment of the invention, the dynamic fusion device includes a geometric shape with an interior hollow region, preferably having sloped interior sidewalls. This feature allows the device to bend in a direction transverse to the plane of the geometric shape. The angle of the interior sidewalls can vary depending upon the desired amount of projection of the pivot point, which acts as a virtual axis of rotation for the device.
While the dynamic fixation devices described herein act to naturally control the axis or region of rotation within the device, it is also advantageous to consider the disc as part of the construct. If the disc is assumed to be competent as regards axial loads as opposed to translational loads, this competence can be used to control the disc height and concomitantly, the anterior portion of the implant and vertebral construct. Thus, in yet a separate embodiment, this allows a posterior construct having a rotatable anterior-posterior segment to effectively control translation within a specific range of motion of the segmental construct. Although there is a slight translation allowed, this is well within the natural region of rotation. This embodiment preferably includes a hinged portion having pin. If anterior-posterior segment or hinged arm is considered to be an elastomeric segment, its function depends on the translational forces being less than required to cause buckling of this segment. Controlling the shape of cross-section of this segment can allow forward bending of the spine while still maintaining competence in compression in the range of forces encountered in the implanted situation.
For the above described devices, first and second rod arms are attached to either end of the flexible construct, with the other end of the rod arms attached to connectors, which in turn are connected to pedicle screws that are inserted into vertebrae of the spine. During flexion and extension each vertebra exhibits an arcuate motion in relation to the vertebra below. The center of the arc lies below the moving vertebra. The dynamic fusion device provides a device for allowing movement of the vertebrae, with a forwardly or anteriorly projected pivot location that models and substantially aligns with the actual pivot point of rotation for the vertebrae to which the device is attached. Accordingly, the dynamic fusion device of the present invention provides a bendable rod for fusion that mimics the movement of the vertebrae of the spine.
The dynamic portions of the various embodiments of the present invention lengthen as they are elongated and shorten as they compressed. This characteristic allows the devices to be implanted in the spine with a pedicle screw system, and while the actual construct is positioned well dorsal in the spine, it allows the spine to function as though there were a flexible construct in the anterior column of the spine.
In use, a problematic spinal disc is initially identified by a physician. During surgery, an incision is made through the skin and muscle overlying the implant location of the spine. Then a first pedicle screw is inserted into a first vertebra and a second pedicle screw is inserted into a second vertebra. The surgeon then attaches the dynamic fixation device to the pedicle screws using either an adjustable connector or an end connector that is integrally formed as a part of the dynamic fixation device.
Various embodiments have been described in this summary of the invention but such embodiments are by no means to be deemed limiting to the “present invention” and the detailed description, the figures and the claims should be referred to in there totality to appreciate the true scope and breath of the present invention. Moreover, while much of the above discussion has focused on devices and particular configurations, various aspects of the present invention relate to surgical methods, methods of making such devices and methods of use which are also to be understood as being part of the present invention.
Additional advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following discussion, particularly when taken together with the accompanying drawings.
a is a side elevation view of a first embodiment of a dynamic fixation device used in conjunction with pedicle screws;
b is a side perspective view of the device shown in
c is a side perspective view of the device shown in
d is a side perspective view of an embodiment of a dynamic fixation device;
e is a view of the device shown in
f is a detail view of a portion of
a is a side elevation view of a separate embodiment of a dynamic fixation device used in conjunction with pedicle screws;
b is a side perspective view of the device shown in
c is a side perspective view of the device shown in
a is a side elevation view of a modification of the dynamic fixation device shown in
a is a front perspective view of a separate embodiment of a dynamic fixation device;
b is a front elevation view of the device shown in
c is a rear elevation view of the device shown in
d is a side elevation view of the device shown in
e is a side perspective view of the device shown in
f is a side perspective view of the device shown in
a is a side elevation view of a separate embodiment of a dynamic fixation device used in conjunction with pedicle screws;
b is a side perspective view of the device shown in
c is a side perspective view of the device shown in
a is a side elevation view of a separate embodiment of a dynamic fixation device used in conjunction with pedicle screws;
a is a side elevation view of a separate embodiment of a dynamic fixation device used in conjunction with pedicle screws;
b is a side perspective view of the device shown in
c is a side perspective view of the device shown in
a is a side elevation view of a separate embodiment of a dynamic fixation device used in conjunction with pedicle screws;
b is a side elevation view of a portion of the device shown in
c is a side perspective view of the device shown in
d is a side perspective view of the device shown in
The above listed drawings are not necessarily to scale.
While the present invention will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which particular embodiments and methods of implantation are shown, it is to be understood at the outset that persons skilled in the art may modify the invention herein described while achieving the functions and results of this invention. Accordingly, the descriptions which follow are to be understood as illustrative and exemplary of specific structures, aspects and features within the broad scope of the present invention and not as limiting of such broad scope.
As noted above, at each intervertebral joint or disc D, flexion involves a combination of anterior sagittal rotation and a small amplitude anterior translation. The various embodiments of the present invention allow for controlled rotation while limiting translation within an acceptable, normal physiological range.
Referring now to
Still referring to
In a separate aspect dynamic fixation device 10, the centerline of geometric shape 12 is offset relative to the longitudinal axis of dynamic fixation device 10. More particularly, as shown in
It is an aspect of this embodiment that the arms 22a, 22b, 22c, and 22d of geometric shape 12 are situated desired angles (e.g., at approximately 90 degree angles) relative to each other when device 10 is in the neutral position. For example, arm 22a is situated at an angle of about 90 degrees relative to arm 22b and arm 22d. Likewise, arm 22c is situated at an angle of about 90 degrees relative to arm 22b and arm 22d. Upon deformation of geometric shape 12 due to flexion of the spine, geometric shape 12 deforms and the angles between the arms will change.
Still referring to
As shown in the example illustrated in
In use, a surgeon first makes an incision and then inserts pedicle screws 20. Subsequently, first rod end 14 and second rod end 16 of dynamic fixation device 10 are preferably interconnected using connectors 18a and 18b to pedicle screws 20 that are inserted into vertebrae V1 and V2 of the spine. During flexion and extension, each vertebra exhibits an arcuate motion in relation to the vertebra below. The center of the arc lies below the moving vertebra. Dynamic fixation device 10 provides a device for allowing movement of the upper vertebra V1 to a flexed or second position 30, with a forwardly or anteriorly projected pivot location 32, as compared to the location of the longitudinal axis L-L of the device 10 when it is in the neutral position.
In a modification of the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
The interior hollow region 112 preferably includes transverse straight sidewalls 120. That is, the interior sidewalls 120 have an interior surface 124 that is at an angle of 90 degrees relative to the planar surface 128 of geometric shape 108.
In one aspect of this embodiment, interior sidewalls 120 are situated at 90 degree angles relative to each other, as labeled in
Attached to the exterior of geometric shape 108 at two opposing partially circular corners 116, are two rod arms 132a,b. As shown in the illustrative example depicted in
In use, first arm 132a and second arm 132b of dynamic fixation device 104 are preferably interconnected to connectors 18a and 18b and then to pedicle screws 20 that are inserted into vertebrae of the spine (not shown). During flexion (forward bending) and extension (backwards bending), each vertebra exhibits an arcuate motion in relation to the vertebra below. The center of the arc lies below the moving vertebra. Dynamic fixation device 104 provides a device for allowing movement of the vertebra, with a forwardly or anteriorly projected pivot location that models and substantially aligns with the actual vertebra's pivot point of rotation. Accordingly, dynamic fixation device 104 provides a bendable rod for fusion that mimics the movement of the vertebrae of the spine.
Referring now to
Still referring to
b and 4c show dynamic fixation device 34 in its neutral and flexed positions, respectively. The effect of the substantially geometric shapes 36a and 36b is to produce an anteriorly projected effective pivot point 32 that substantially matches the rotational point of the vertebrae to which it is attached. Thus, the device of
In a separate aspect dynamic fixation device 34, the centerline of substantially geometric shapes 36a and 36b is offset posteriorly relative to the longitudinal axis of dynamic fixation device 34. More particularly, as shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Still referring to
First rod end 14 and second rod end 16 preferably are interconnected to pedicle screws 20 using connectors 18a and 18b, respectively. Connectors 18a and 18b can be formed as an integral part of the end of dynamic fixation device 62, or they can be separate devices, as is known to those knowledgeable in the art.
Still referring to the example of the present embodiment shown in
It is an aspect of the present embodiment that bend 68 preferably acts as a hinge and is able to move down if the vertebrae to which the dynamic fixation device 62 is attached is placed in compression. In addition, bend 68 can move up to accommodate flexion of the vertebrae. This motion of bend 68 and the anterior-posterior segment 64 closely approximates the normal arc of motion of human vertebra. When in compression, bend 68 moves down along a lower arc path 74. Lower arc path 74 is caused when dynamic fixation device 62 is placed in compression and anterior-posterior segment 64 moves toward rod arm 65, thereby decreasing the angle β. In a typical human patient, angle β may decrease up to 30 degrees as bend 68 passes along lower arc path 74. To achieve this motion, bend 68 of dynamic fixation device 62 preferably includes a structure to allow it to act as a hinge. Accordingly, bend 68 may include a pin 75. As illustrated in
The various embodiments of the present invention allows a slight amount of translational motion of the vertebrae, but the amount of translational motion allowed is within the physiological limits of normal motion of the human vertebrae. For example, for the embodiment shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Still referring to
As noted above, rails 90 (shown in dashed lines) interconnect the first rod member 84 to second rod member 86. Preferably, rails 90 comprise a plate 96 with hinge pins 46 situated through both ends of the plate 96. Plate 96 is shown in
By way of example and not limitation, preferably spring 88 is a cylindrical shaped spring having a proper spring constant for the dynamic fixation device 82. In addition, spring 88 may also take the form of a resilient material, such as a properly sized silicone insert shaped, for example, as a disc or a sphere. During flexion motion of the spine, second rod member 86 moves up and forward. During this movement, the spring 88 rolls between the first rod member 84 and the second rod member 86. Since the spring 88 rolls, friction between first rod member 84 and second rod member 86 is minimal. Thus, the ability of the spring to roll can be modified by adjusting the shape of the spring and the shape and texture of the interior walls of the confinement zone 100. More particularly, the shape and surface texture of concave surfaces 92 and 94 of the first and second rod members 84 and 86, respectively, can be modified to adjust the magnitude and ease of motion in elongation of the second rod member 86 relative to the first rod member 84. Since the spring 88 is cable of being compressed, it deforms, thereby allowing bending. The amount of compression is controlled by the spring characteristics, such as the spring material type, diameter and wall thickness, as well as the shape of the confinement zone 100 and the texture of the concave surfaces 92 and 94. With regard to the shape of the confinement zone 100, the concave surfaces 92 and 94 serve as the compression surfaces of the confinement zone 100 for spring 88. The shape of the curves of the concave surfaces 92 and 94 can be altered to control the degree of spring compression as the construct elongates. For example, referring to
Referring now to
Dynamic fixation device 82 is allowed to elongate because second rod member 86 is hingedly attached to first rod member 84, thereby allowing vertical motion of second rod member 86 relative to first rod member 84. Thus, the structure of dynamic fixation device 82 provides for an articulated device that can elongate, thus accommodating the natural physiologic motion of the spine.
Dynamic fixation device 82 has application to providing segmentally applied motion control of the spine because each motion segment designated to receive an implant can have a dynamic fixation device implant customized through its dimensions and spring constant, thereby giving the patient controlled motion within a desired normal physiologic range.
In a typical use to span two vertebra, the total length of the dynamic fixation devices 10, 34, 34′, 50, 58, 62, 78, and 82 may be approximately 15 to 35 mm. The geometric shape portions or hinge structures of the dynamic fixation devices, preferably occupy the central region of the implant that bridges two vertebra. That is, the geometric shapes or hinge structures occupy only a portion of the implant, thereby allowing first rod end 14 and second rod end 16 to be solid rod segments that can be interconnected to a pedicle screw using a connector device. For those devices comprising a geometric shape or hinged structure, these structures will typically occupy approximately 15 to 20 mm of the total length.
For a dynamic fixation device spanning one joint, it will expand up to approximately 5 to 10 mm in length, and will rotate forward up to between 5 to 10 degrees to accommodate flexion of the spine. Obviously, different size dynamic fixation devices may be used to accommodate the specific needs of each individual patient. More particularly, a relatively large dynamic fixation device may be needed for a large man, while a relatively small dynamic fixation device may be needed for a smaller patient, such as child or a petite woman. However, a limited number of sizes may provide adequate coverage for the majority of the patient population. For any given device, a potential elongation of the dynamic fixation device consistent with the desired flexion of the vetebral motion segment and associated distraction of the plane of the fixation device is anticipated.
The dynamic fixation devices can be used to flexibly secure a plurality of vertebra. Alternatively, the dynamic fixation devices can be located at specific points where bending of the spine is desired, while a rigid rod may be used at other locations desired by the physician. Where used, rigid rod portions may be curved, thereby influencing the implanted location of the geometric shape hinged structures, and thus the effective pivot point.
The structures of the present invention are made from one or more materials that possesses the appropriate strength characteristics necessary to withstand loading from the human body when used in medical applications. In addition, the materials are compatible with the human body. Preferably, materials include ceramics, plastics, metals, or carbon fiber composites. More preferably, the materials are made from titanium, a titanium alloy, or stainless steel.
The above described alternative configurations offer different bending characteristics. The dimensions will vary depending upon the specific design necessary for a specific patient. More particularly, the dimensions of geometric shapes and hinged devices will likely be bigger for a large heavy man, as opposed to that needed for a small petite woman. Furthermore, the type of material used to construct the dynamic fixation devices described herein will also impact the required dimensions of the devices. Dynamic fixation devices described herein may be made of a variety of materials, preferably metals or materials demonstrating resilient characteristics, and more preferably, a titanium alloy or surgical stainless steel. Since different materials have different strength and resilient properties, the type of material used will, in part, dictate the dimensions of the rod portion required to achieve a certain function in a specific patient.
Devices disclosed herein can also be made of thermal memory materials or materials that possess different elastic properties at varying temperatures. In this aspect of the invention, the subject component(s) may be heated or cooled to a desired temperature, implanted, then subsequently allowed to cool or warm to the temperature of the ambient conditions that will exist during the usage period for the subject device, namely, normal body temperature.
It is to be understood that the present invention may have application to medical devices other than spinal implants. For example, the present invention can be used in external fixator systems.
Furthermore, it is understood that the present invention has application outside the medical field. The dynamic fixation device of the present invention is not limited to medical implants. The device could be used in seismic dampening applications. Alternatively, the present invention could be used to secure any two objects, such as in linking mechanisms, and has application to any type of mechanical device with a moving connection. Other applications, by no means exhaustive, may include connecting any articulated device, such as an implement connection to a tractor. It may also be used in heretofore static type connection applications, such as attaching an antenna to a base structure. One of skill in various of the construction arts will appreciate how to make and use the present invention in view of the guidance provided herein (with respect to a surgical application) and in view of the figures set forth herein.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present invention, as set forth in the following claims.
adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present invention, as set forth in the following
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/435,330 filed on May 8, 2003, which claimed the benefit of: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/379,167 filed May 8, 2002 entitled “Dynamic Fusion System”; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/390,181 filed Jun. 19, 2002 entitled “Dynamic Fusion System”; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/417,722 filed Oct. 9, 2002 entitled “Dynamic Fusion System,” all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Cross-reference and incorporation thereof is also made to U.S. Nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 10/406,895 filed on Apr. 4, 2003 entitled “Dynamic Fixation Device And Method of Use,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,966,910.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2191 | Pitney | Jul 1841 | A |
569839 | Roeloffs | Oct 1896 | A |
605652 | Pitt | Jun 1898 | A |
1090746 | Nourse | Mar 1914 | A |
1097978 | Johnson | May 1914 | A |
2611434 | Mugler | Sep 1952 | A |
3467079 | James | Sep 1969 | A |
3470872 | Grieshaber | Oct 1969 | A |
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
3893454 | Hagelin | Jul 1975 | A |
4041939 | Hall | Aug 1977 | A |
4232660 | Coles | Nov 1980 | A |
4440168 | Warren | Apr 1984 | A |
4481947 | Chester | Nov 1984 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4617922 | Griggs | Oct 1986 | A |
4620460 | Gonzales, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4686972 | Kurland | Aug 1987 | A |
4736738 | Lipovsek et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4743260 | Burton | May 1988 | A |
4747394 | Watanabe | May 1988 | A |
4798111 | Cheeseman | Jan 1989 | A |
4803976 | Frigg et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817587 | Janese | Apr 1989 | A |
4862891 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
4863423 | Wallace | Sep 1989 | A |
4882958 | McNeeley | Nov 1989 | A |
4889112 | Schachner et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4946458 | Harms et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4995875 | Coes | Feb 1991 | A |
5002542 | Frigg | Mar 1991 | A |
5002576 | Fuhrmann et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5018507 | Montaldi | May 1991 | A |
5024213 | Asher et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026373 | Ray et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5030220 | Howland | Jul 1991 | A |
5030223 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5035232 | Lutze et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5048379 | Gramera | Sep 1991 | A |
5052373 | Michelson | Oct 1991 | A |
5055104 | Ray | Oct 1991 | A |
5084043 | Hertzmann | Jan 1992 | A |
5098435 | Stednitz | Mar 1992 | A |
5106376 | Mononen | Apr 1992 | A |
5129899 | Small et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129900 | Asher et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133720 | Greenberg | Jul 1992 | A |
5135525 | Biscoping | Aug 1992 | A |
5148724 | Rexford | Sep 1992 | A |
5158543 | Lazarus | Oct 1992 | A |
5165306 | Hellon | Nov 1992 | A |
5180393 | Commarmond | Jan 1993 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5217007 | Ciaglia | Jun 1993 | A |
5275600 | Allard et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5275611 | Behl | Jan 1994 | A |
5279567 | Ciaglia | Jan 1994 | A |
5282863 | Burton | Feb 1994 | A |
5292309 | Van Tassel | Mar 1994 | A |
5303694 | Mikhail | Apr 1994 | A |
5304179 | Wagner | Apr 1994 | A |
5306275 | Bryan | Apr 1994 | A |
5306309 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312360 | Behl | May 1994 | A |
5312405 | Korotko et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330473 | Howland | Jul 1994 | A |
5330474 | Lin | Jul 1994 | A |
5330476 | Hiot et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5356413 | Martins et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363841 | Coker | Nov 1994 | A |
5387213 | Breard et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5415661 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
5423816 | Lin | Jun 1995 | A |
5431639 | Shaw | Jul 1995 | A |
5431651 | Goble | Jul 1995 | A |
D361381 | Koros et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
5439464 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
5466238 | Lin | Nov 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati | Dec 1995 | A |
5474555 | Puno et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480401 | Navas | Jan 1996 | A |
5484440 | Allard | Jan 1996 | A |
5489274 | Chu | Feb 1996 | A |
5489308 | Kuslich et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498262 | Bryan | Mar 1996 | A |
5499983 | Hughes | Mar 1996 | A |
5501684 | Schlapfer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5512038 | O'Neal et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5545166 | Howland | Aug 1996 | A |
5549612 | Yapp et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558622 | Greenberg | Sep 1996 | A |
5562663 | Wisnewski et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5565502 | Glimcher et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569300 | Redmon | Oct 1996 | A |
5584831 | McKay | Dec 1996 | A |
5584833 | Fournet-Fayard et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591166 | Bernhardt et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5591235 | Kuslich | Jan 1997 | A |
5593409 | Michelson | Jan 1997 | A |
5601550 | Esser | Feb 1997 | A |
5603714 | Kaneda et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611778 | Brinon | Mar 1997 | A |
5613968 | Lin | Mar 1997 | A |
5628740 | Mullane | May 1997 | A |
5630816 | Kambin | May 1997 | A |
5643263 | Simonson | Jul 1997 | A |
5643264 | Sherman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645544 | Tai et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645599 | Samani | Jul 1997 | A |
5649925 | Barbera Alacreu | Jul 1997 | A |
5667506 | Sutterlin | Sep 1997 | A |
5672175 | Martin | Sep 1997 | A |
5683389 | Orsak | Nov 1997 | A |
5683392 | Richelsoph et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683463 | Godefroy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687739 | McPherson | Nov 1997 | A |
5690632 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691397 | Glimcher et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695993 | Fukudome et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702455 | Saggar | Dec 1997 | A |
5716355 | Jackson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716415 | Steffee | Feb 1998 | A |
5725528 | Errico et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735850 | Baumgartner et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735851 | Errico et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5735899 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743853 | Lauderdale | Apr 1998 | A |
5746720 | Stouder, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5746741 | Kraus et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752957 | Ralph et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766221 | Benderev et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766253 | Brosnahan, III | Jun 1998 | A |
5772582 | Huttner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5782832 | Larsen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785648 | Min | Jul 1998 | A |
5785710 | Michelson | Jul 1998 | A |
5785712 | Runciman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley | Aug 1998 | A |
5797912 | Runciman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800435 | Errico et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810816 | Roussouly et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810817 | Roussouly et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
D399955 | Koros et al. | Oct 1998 | S |
5816257 | Chin | Oct 1998 | A |
5827328 | Buttermann | Oct 1998 | A |
5836948 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
RE36020 | Moore et al. | Dec 1998 | E |
5851207 | Cesarone | Dec 1998 | A |
5860977 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865847 | Kohrs et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865848 | Baker | Feb 1999 | A |
5876404 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882344 | Stouder, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885285 | Simonson | Mar 1999 | A |
5885299 | Winslow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885300 | Tokuhashi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895352 | Kleiner | Apr 1999 | A |
5895390 | Moran et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897593 | Kohrs et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899901 | Middleton | May 1999 | A |
5902231 | Foley | May 1999 | A |
5902304 | Walker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904650 | Wells | May 1999 | A |
5906616 | Pavlov et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913818 | Co et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros | Jul 1999 | A |
5928233 | Apfelbaum et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931838 | Vito | Aug 1999 | A |
5938663 | Petreto | Aug 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947965 | Bryan | Sep 1999 | A |
5954635 | Foley | Sep 1999 | A |
5954671 | O'Neill | Sep 1999 | A |
5961516 | Graf | Oct 1999 | A |
5967970 | Cowan | Oct 1999 | A |
5968098 | Winslow | Oct 1999 | A |
5971920 | Nagel | Oct 1999 | A |
5976135 | Sherman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976146 | Ogawa | Nov 1999 | A |
5984924 | Asher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996447 | Bayouth | Dec 1999 | A |
5997539 | Errico et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004322 | Bernstein | Dec 1999 | A |
6007487 | Foley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010520 | Pattison | Jan 2000 | A |
6017342 | Rinner | Jan 2000 | A |
6027533 | Olerud | Feb 2000 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048342 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050997 | Mullane | Apr 2000 | A |
6063088 | Winslow | May 2000 | A |
6068630 | Zucherman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074390 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074393 | Sitoto | Jun 2000 | A |
6080155 | Michelson | Jun 2000 | A |
6080193 | Hochshuler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081741 | Hollis | Jun 2000 | A |
6083225 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6083226 | Fiz | Jul 2000 | A |
6090112 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102948 | Brosnahan, III | Aug 2000 | A |
6113602 | Sand | Sep 2000 | A |
6117137 | Halm et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6117174 | Nolan | Sep 2000 | A |
6120434 | Kimura | Sep 2000 | A |
6120506 | Kohrs et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123705 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
6123706 | Lange | Sep 2000 | A |
6132430 | Wagner | Oct 2000 | A |
D433296 | Yamakawa | Nov 2000 | S |
6146383 | Studer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149652 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149686 | Kulish et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152871 | Foley | Nov 2000 | A |
6152926 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156006 | Brosens | Dec 2000 | A |
6156038 | Zucherman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159179 | Simonson | Dec 2000 | A |
6162170 | Foley | Dec 2000 | A |
6162236 | Osada | Dec 2000 | A |
D436513 | Yamakawa | Jan 2001 | S |
6176823 | Foley | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6176861 | Bernstein et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179838 | Fiz | Jan 2001 | B1 |
D438074 | Marr | Feb 2001 | S |
6183471 | Zucherman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187005 | Brace et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190387 | Zucherman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190414 | Young et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196696 | Shiao | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6196969 | Bester et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197002 | Peterson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206822 | Foley | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206826 | Mathews et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206885 | Ghahremani et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206922 | Zdeblick et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206923 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210413 | Justis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214004 | Coker | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217509 | Foley | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224597 | Coker | May 2001 | B1 |
6224608 | Ciccolella | May 2001 | B1 |
6224631 | Kohrs | May 2001 | B1 |
6231575 | Krag | May 2001 | B1 |
6235030 | Zucherman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238397 | Zucherman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245072 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248104 | Chopin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248106 | Ferree | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258097 | Cook | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261287 | Metz-Stavenhagen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264658 | Lee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267763 | Castro | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267764 | Elberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267765 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270498 | Michelson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273914 | Papas | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273917 | Inoue | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279501 | Taylor, Jr. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283966 | Houfburg | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287309 | Baccelli et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287313 | Sasso | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287343 | Kuslich et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290700 | Schmotzer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293949 | Justis et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296609 | Brau | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299614 | Kretschmer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302842 | Auerbach et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309390 | Le Courdic et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309391 | Crandall et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312432 | Leppelmeier | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332883 | Zucherman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342057 | Brace | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348058 | Melkent et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354176 | Nordlin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355038 | Pisharodi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361541 | Barnhart | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364881 | Apgar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368320 | Le Couedic et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368350 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368351 | Glenn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371959 | Trice | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379354 | Rogozinski | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391058 | Kuslich et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395033 | Pepper | May 2002 | B1 |
6418821 | Yamakawa | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425901 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428472 | Haas | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440169 | Elberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440170 | Jackson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443953 | Perra et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443989 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461330 | Miyagi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461359 | Tribus et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471724 | Zdeblick et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475219 | Shelokov | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478798 | Howland | Nov 2002 | B1 |
D466766 | Marty | Dec 2002 | S |
6506151 | Estes et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6520907 | Foley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524238 | Velikaris et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530880 | Pagliuca | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530926 | Davison | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540756 | Vaughan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551320 | Lieberman | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554831 | Rivard et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562046 | Sasso | May 2003 | B2 |
6562073 | Foley | May 2003 | B2 |
6565569 | Assaker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6569164 | Assaker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6576017 | Foley et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579292 | Taylor | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585738 | Mangione et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6585769 | Muhanna et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595993 | Donno et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6610062 | Bailey et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6626904 | Jammet et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626906 | Young | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6648887 | Ashman | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652527 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671725 | Noel, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676661 | Benllock et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679833 | Smith et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682532 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685705 | Taylor | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692434 | Ritland | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6736816 | Ritland | May 2004 | B2 |
6743257 | Castro | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749613 | Conchy et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749614 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752832 | Neumann | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761719 | Justis et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783528 | Vincent-Prestigiacomo | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6851430 | Tsou | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875211 | Nichols et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6916319 | Munting | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6916330 | Simonson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929606 | Ritland | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6951538 | Ritland | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6955678 | Gabriel et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966910 | Ritland | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974480 | Messerli et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991632 | Ritland | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7008421 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7115142 | Muhanna et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7166073 | Ritland | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7207992 | Ritland | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7344539 | Serhan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7753937 | Chervitz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758582 | Ferrante et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20010005796 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010021 | Boyd et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010012942 | Estes | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027320 | Sasso | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034521 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047207 | Michelson | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020011135 | Hall | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013586 | Justis | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016592 | Branch | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022764 | Smith | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029082 | Muhanna | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049368 | Ritland | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052603 | Nichols et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058948 | Arlettaz | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068973 | Jackson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020068975 | Teitelbaum et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077632 | Tsou | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082695 | Neumann | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107571 | Foley | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107572 | Foley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111625 | Richelsoph et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120270 | Trieu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123668 | Ritland | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143235 | Pagliuca | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030045874 | Thomas | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083689 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093078 | Ritland | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109880 | Shirado et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139812 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144665 | Munting | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171749 | Le Couedic et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171751 | Ritland | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187431 | Simonson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191470 | Ritland | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195087 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220689 | Ritland | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236447 | Ritland | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002708 | Ritland | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073215 | Carli | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106997 | Lieberson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138534 | Ritland | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172023 | Ritland | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181223 | Ritland | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040254428 | Ritland | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004593 | Simonson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020920 | Ritland | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027360 | Webb et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050119656 | Ferrante et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143737 | Pafford et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149023 | Ritland | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149191 | Cragg et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203517 | Jahng et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203519 | Harms et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209694 | Loeb | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228233 | Ritland | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060009768 | Ritland | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025770 | Schlapfer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041259 | Paul et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064090 | Park | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069390 | Frigg et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079899 | Ritland | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085076 | Krishna et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060195087 | Sacher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060255074 | Amir | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016193 | Ritland | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070233090 | Naifeh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080071275 | Ferree | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2320821 | Aug 1999 | CA |
9004960 | Aug 1991 | DE |
0820731 | Jan 1998 | EP |
1585427 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1658815 | May 2006 | EP |
2735351 | Dec 1996 | FR |
2755844 | May 1998 | FR |
2796828 | Feb 2001 | FR |
2799949 | Apr 2001 | FR |
2812185 | Feb 2002 | FR |
H07-008504 | Jan 1998 | JP |
H11-501235 | Feb 1999 | JP |
H11-502742 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000-33091 | Feb 2000 | JP |
9508298 | Mar 1995 | WO |
9629947 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9706742 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9732533 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9909902 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9940866 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0018306 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0057801 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0164144 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0167973 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0207621 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0236026 | Jan 2002 | WO |
02060330 | Aug 2002 | WO |
02002022 | Oct 2002 | WO |
02102259 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03026523 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03073908 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03094699 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03105704 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004052218 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004075778 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004089244 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Caspar “Technique of Microsurgery: Microsurgery of the Lumbar Spine: Principles and Techniques in Spine Surgery”; Aspen Publications; 1990; 105-122. |
China Chemical Reporter, “Rapid Development of Polyether Ether Ketone”, CNCIC Chemdata Inc 2004, 2 pages. |
Green, “Body Building—Medical Materials for Systems and Scaffolding,” Materials World, Journal of the Institute of Materials, vol. 10, No. 2, 2001, 4 pages. |
Green, “Effects of Gamma Sterilisation on Implant Grade Polyetheretherketone,” Invibio Inc, Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 1 page. |
Green, “In Vivo Biostability Study on Polyaryletheretherketone Biomaterial,” Invibio Inc Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 2 pages. |
Green, et al. “A Polyaryletherketone Biomaterial for Use in Medical Implant Applications,” Lancashire, United Kingdom, 2001, 1 page. |
Green, et al. “Polyetheretherketone Polymer and Compounds for Surgical Applications,” Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 9 pages. |
Green, Stuart, “Peek-Optima Polymer in the Implantable Medical Device Industry,” Invibio Inc Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 2 pages. |
Hilton et al.; “Meditronic Sofamor Danek METRX Microdiscectomy Surgical Technique Brochure”; 2000. |
Invibio, Biomaterials Solutions, “High Performance PEEK-Optima Biocompatible Polymer Chosen for Dental Abutment Healing Caps,” Invibio Inc Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 1 page. |
Invibio, Biomaterials Solutions, “High Performance PEEK-Optima Biocompatible Polymer Chosen for New Generation Heart Valve,” Invibio Inc., Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 1 page. |
Invibio, Biomaterials Solutions, “PEEK˜Classix,” Invibio Inc., Lancashire, United Kingdom, 2003, 2 pages. |
Invibio, Biomaterials Solutions, “PEEK-Optima Polymer: Performance Purity Flexibility Endurance,” Invibio Inc., Lancashire, United Kingdom, 2004, 3 pages. |
Invibio, Biomaterials Solutions, “PEEK-Optima, Composite Hip,” Invibio Inc., Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 2 pages. |
Invibio, Biomaterials Solutions, “PEEK-Optima, Spiked Washers,” Invibio Inc., Lancashire, United Kingdom, undated, 1 page. |
Kambin; “Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy: Minimal Intervention in Spinal Surgery”; National Ubrary of Medicine; 1991; 67-100. |
Kambin; “Percutaneous Posterolateral Discectomy”; Clincial Orthopaedics and Related Research. Section II; 145-154119. |
Savitz; Same-Day Microsurgical Arthroscopic Latera-Approach Laser-Assisted (SMALL) Fluoroscopic Discectomy; Journal of Neurosurgery; Jun. 1994; 1039-1045. |
Schaffer et al.; “Percutaneous Posterolateral Lumbar Discectomy and Decompression with a 6.9 Millimeter Cannula”; Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery; 1991; 822-831. |
Sofamor Danek Video Systems Brochure. |
“New Minimally Invasive Techniques, Improve Outcome of Spine Surgeries”, Medtronic Sofamor Danek. |
Tangram Technology Ltd., “Polymer Data File: Polyether Ether Keotone-PEEK,” Available at http://www.tangram.co.uk/TI-Polymer-PEEK.html, 2001, 5 pages. |
Web pages, http://brainlab.com, Apr. 2, 2002; 5 pages. |
Wiltse; “New Uses and Refinements of the Paraspinal Approach to the Lumbar Spine”; Spine; 1988; 13(6):696-706. |
U.S. Reissue U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,991 to Simonson, filed Jun. 10, 2002. |
Supplemental Search Report dated Jun. 10, 2008, issued in EPO Application No. 04758814.0. |
Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2008, issued in EPO Application No. 04758814.0. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 11, 2005, issued in Application No. PCT/US2004/010277. |
Written Opinion dated Feb. 11, 2005, issued in Application No. PCT/US2004/010277. |
International Preliminary Report dated Oct. 27, 2005, issued in Application No. PCT/US2004/010277. |
Written Opinion dated Oct. 14, 2005, issued in Application No. PCT/US2003/014615. |
International Preliminary Examination Report dated Jan. 10, 2006, issued in Application No. PCT/US2003/014615. |
International Preliminary Report dated Jan. 10, 2008, issued in Application No. PCT/US2006/024491. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 25, 2007, issued in Application No. PCT/US2006/024491. |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 25, 2007, issued in Application No. PCT/US2006/024491. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal, dated Oct. 17, 2006, issued in South Korean Application No. 10/2005/7018906. |
Notification of Decision to Grant, dated May 30, 2007, issued in South Korean Application No. 10/2005/7018906. |
Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2008, issued in Japanese Application No. 2006-509659. |
Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2007, issued in Canada Application No. 2520741. |
Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2007, issued in Chinese Application No. 200480014833.8. |
Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2008, issued in Chinese Application No. 200480014833.8. |
Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2010, issued in European Application No. 03726737.4. |
Examiner's First Report dated Mar. 27, 2007, issued in Australian Application No. 2004228019. |
Examiner's First Report dated Oct. 17, 2007, issued in Australian Application No. 2003228960. |
Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,530. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,530. |
Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2005, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Office Action dated May 5, 2005, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2006, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 23, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/435,330. |
Office Action dated Aug. 17, 2004, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/406,895. |
Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2004, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/406,895. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 1, 2005, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/406,895. |
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 13, 2005, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 10/406,895. |
Office Action dated May 7, 2009, issued in Japanese Application No. 2004-502799. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2010, issued in Japanese Application No. 2004-502799. |
Supplemental Search Report dated Mar. 24, 2010, issued in European Application No. 03726737.4. |
Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2009, issued in Chinese Application No. 200680030105.5. |
Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2009, issued in Canadian Application No. 2484923. |
Re-Issue U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,991, filed Jun. 10, 2002 by Simonson. |
Office Action dated Oct. 24, 2008, issued in Australian Application No. 2008201824. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 14, 2010, issued in Australian Application No. 2008201824. |
Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2010, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/425,987. |
Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/425,987. |
Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2011 in Australian Application No. 2006262057. |
Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,530. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 22, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/223,530. |
Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012, in Canadian Application No. 2612943. |
European Extended Search Report dated Apr. 27, 2012 in EPO Application No. 12001018.6. |
European Extended Search Report dated Apr. 27, 2012 in EPO Application No. 12001019.4. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 14, 2010 in Canadian Application No. 2484923. |
Final Office Action Dated Nov. 28, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/425,987. |
Office Action dated Nov. 25, 2011 in Japanese Application No. 2008-518436 (English translation included). |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2012 in Japanese Application No. 2008-518436 (English translation included). |
EPO Office Action dated Jan. 21, 2013, issued in European Application No. 12001018.6. |
Office Action dated Feb. 20, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/714,738. |
Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/729,956. |
Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2011 in EPO App 03726737.4. |
EPO Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2013 in EPO Application No. 12001019.4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100174318 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60390181 | Jun 2002 | US | |
60417722 | Oct 2002 | US | |
60379167 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10435330 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 12729422 | US |