Patent Grant
7748846
The present invention relates to systems for maintaining the focus of a subject on a specified region of a display for purposes of testing or improving a subject's vision.
The macula is the region of the retina which is used for high acuity vision, as is typically required for reading. To diagnose macular damage, a patient may undergo various types of examinations, including automated perimetry or campimetry, in which the patient is positioned in front of a test surface and is asked to maintain focus on a target. A computer then actuates one or more light sources to present visual stimuli at specific points on the test surface. The patient is asked to press a button in response to perceived test stimuli and the examiner or computer records the patient input and associated spatial information. In this way a visual field map is created.
The human retina is unable to fixate continuously upon an unmoving, unchanging stimulus. After less than a second of stimulation, the subject's retinal cells will adapt to the stimulus and no longer relay any information to the brain regarding the stimulus. Such adaptation is problematic for devices requiring constant fixation upon a fixed point since the viewer must change fixation in order to continue seeing the object of regard. This changing fixation may reduce the accuracy, precision, and overall effectiveness of testing, therapeutic, or non-therapeutic visual stimulation programs that require continuous unchanging visual fixation.
The human visual system includes two simultaneously functioning pathways. The more primitive “M” pathway is dedicated largely to the recognition of moving objects or objects that change in luminosity. The “P” pathway is more evolved and more closely coupled to neural structures associated with conscious thought. The “P” pathway provides recognition of fine detail and color to the brain and is much less committed to motion detection.
In persons who have suffered damage to the visual system (which includes the brain itself), these two pathways frequently are affected to different degrees. Moreover, the two systems usually recover function at different rates. This disparity of functional loss and recovery can cause significant disharmony of the innately matched systems and resulting disturbances to the overall sensory function of the subject.
The ability to accurately detect the different types of visual processing disturbance and to properly treat the affected pathways is of vital importance to the treating practitioner and ultimately, the patient. Increased diagnostic testing sensitivity and visual therapy specificity result in better prognosis for recovery of the individual's function. Current diagnostic testing modalities are limited in their ability to detect specific types of visual function damage.
Most field-of-vision testing falls into one of two categories: Static perimetry and kinetic perimetry. Static perimetry is valuable in establishing a depiction of fine light sensitivity or detail within the central 30 to 60 degrees of visual field (“P” cell function), while kinetic perimetry is valuable in identifying the borders of motion vision function (“M” cell function). However, neither technique is able to identify efficiently the amount or level of motion sensitivity at all the points within the borders.
In static perimetry, the patient fixates upon a specific point while light stimuli (spots) are delivered to various points in the peripheral visual field. Static perimetry can be administered using peripheral stimuli of varying brightness to determine the level of luminance sensitivity throughout the field, or with peripheral stimuli of identical brightness, to screen for the presence or absence of vision at various locations.
Kinetic perimetry also requires a patient to fixate a central spot during delivery of peripheral stimuli. In kinetic perimetry, the stimuli are luminous spots of varying size and brightness. The spots are moved from an area where there is known to be no vision (e.g. the far periphery or physiologic blind spot) toward areas where vision may exist. The patient is tasked with responding upon detection of a moving light in the periphery. Test points are delivered along radii of the circle (or “horopter”) of the patient's field of vision. The points of first detection are recorded on a plot and the circumference of the connected points is considered the border of motion and light sensitivity for the brightness and size of the stimulus used.
Frequency doubling technology (FDT) is used to test the spatial resolution of a subject's visual field. In FDT, a subject attempts to observe a peripheral square or circular grating comprised of striations of alternating luminosities. The gratings are modulated in a wave pattern involving temporal changes in luminosity of the striations. The luminosity modulation is performed above the critical flicker frequency (CFF), typically about 25 Hz, so that the modulation is not noticeable to the subject. If the subject's visual field is sufficient, the subject will observe an optical illusion in which the spatial frequency of the striations is doubled, i.e., the space between the striations is halved. The spatial frequency or contrast may be modulated to determine the limits of the subject's spatial resolution. In a patient with visual field damage, e.g., one suffering from glaucoma, an abnormally low spatial frequency may be required for the subject to observe the frequency doubling illusion. In U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,377, issued May 30, 2000 to McKinnon, an alternate version of FDT is employed, in which the grating is isoluminous, but with alternating hue.
Work in the laboratory of Krystel R. Huxlin at the University of Rochester has utilized a series of spot stimuli for visual field therapy. In the poster presentation, “Training-induced perceptual recovery after visual cortical stroke” Eric Kelts, Jennifer M. Williams, Brad Feldman, Mary Hayhoe and Krystel R. Huxlin, 30th Annual NANOS meeting, Orlando, Fla., 2004, stimuli move with respect to the entire visual field. Such an approach is not consistent with visual restoration therapy approaches that individually target small regions of the visual field. Additionally, movement of a stimulus across a large region will tend to cause distraction of a patient, and is thus inconsistent with visual therapy approaches that utilize a fixation stimulus. If patient feedback were collected with such a system, it would be difficult or even impossible to precisely locate the visual field region that caused the patient's perception to be triggered.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, alteration of a fixation stimulus displayed on a computer-driven display allows a human subject to maintain extended visual fixation upon the resulting dynamic stimulus. The fixation is presented upon the display and the stimulus is altered to allow resensitization of the subject's retina, thereby allowing prolonged visual fixation upon the resulting dynamic target.
In accordance with various embodiments, the steps of presenting the stimulus and altering the stimulus may be repeated for a given number of cycles to allow sustained sensitization and prolonged fixation by the subject. The fixation of the subject may be verified by presenting a test cue and recording a subject's input in response to the test cue. Like the dynamic fixation stimulus, the test cue may also be altered to allow resensitization of the subject's retina.
In order to prevent the subject from predicting the time at which a test cue is presented, successive presentation of the test cue may be performed with varying intervening time intervals. One way to vary the time intervals is to vary the number of cycles of presentation of the fixation stimulus and the altered fixation stimulus.
In accordance with particular embodiments, the alteration of the dynamic fixation stimulus is visible only by using a portion of the subject's retina corresponding to about 2 degrees or less of the subject's central visual field.
There are many suitable fixation stimulus geometries and dynamic transformations. For example, the fixation stimulus may have the form of a repetitively translating object, a rotating object, or an intermingled set of cyclically changing objects. The stimulus could include two sets of intermingled striations of opposite and cyclically altering luminosities.
In embodiments of the invention, the dynamic fixation stimulus is used for purposes of vision testing or training.
In related embodiments, a method is provided for stimulating a motion-detecting visual pathway of a subject. A subject is tasked with fixating on a central stimulus displayed on a computer-driven display. While the subject is visually fixated, a peripheral stimulus is presented on the display. At least one characteristic of the peripheral stimulus is altered so as to trigger the motion-sensitive visual pathway of the subject.
In other related embodiments, the altered characteristic may be the spatial locus, size, pattern, luminosity or hue of the stimulus. The altered and base stimulus may be alternately displayed in a cyclical manner to sustain the display of a dynamic peripheral stimulus. While alternately displaying the base and altered stimulus, the subject's response, indicative of their detection of the stimulus, may be monitored and recorded. The dynamic peripheral stimulus may be, for example, a repetitively translating object, or a repetitively blinking object. By first determining the bounds of a subject's visual field, testing or therapy can be concentrated within those bounds.
In further related embodiments, a computer program product for use on a computer system is provided for stimulating motion-sensitive regions of a subject's peripheral vision. The computer program includes a computer usable medium having computer readable program code, which includes program code for providing a dynamic peripheral stimulation displayed upon a computer-driven display and program code for recording the subject's response to the dynamic peripheral stimulation.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a method is provided for maintaining fixation for purposes of testing or treating the visual field of a subject; the method may also be implemented in a computer system or computer program product. The method includes the steps of providing a fixation stimulus for the subject to visually fixate upon, repeatedly altering the stimulus to create an optical illusion that is only detectable by use of the subject's central visual field and presenting a peripheral stimulus to the subject while the subject is fixated on the fixation stimulus. The subject's response to the peripheral stimulus may be recorded.
In related embodiments, the difficulty level of the optical illusion is tuned to match the spatial perception ability of the subject. The optical illusion may be a frequency doubling optical illusion, such as a frequency doubling grating. The difficulty level of the frequency doubling grating may be tuned by altering the spatial frequency of the grating. For example, the tuning process may include increasing the spatial frequency of the grating until the illusion is not properly detected by the subject and then maintaining the spatial frequency at a level that is detectable by the subject, yet near the limit of the spatial resolution of the subject's central visual field. The fixation stimulus may be systematically altered to target different retinal regions, for example, by rotation or translation, thereby preventing desensitization. A fixation test cue may be presented to query the subject's fixation upon the stimulus.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Definitions. As used in this description and the accompanying claims, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated, unless the context otherwise requires:
“Visual Restoration Therapy” shall mean a process for allocating and targeting light stimuli to particular regions of a patient's visual field.
A “subject” shall mean a human receiving light stimuli during a visual restoration therapy session.
In illustrative embodiments of the invention, a dynamic stimulus is presented via a computer-driven display for a human subject (e.g., a patient or trainee) to fixate upon. At least a portion of the dynamic fixation stimulus is periodically altered in appearance, to mitigate the stimulation to corresponding retinal regions and facilitating retinal resensitization. Accordingly, the subject should be able to avoid retinal adaptation and sustain fixation upon the stimulus for longer than would typically be achievable or comfortable with a static stimulus. When used as a central target in perimetry, campimetry, or vision enhancing training (e.g. vision restoration therapy targeting peripheral regions), the dynamic fixation stimulus may help to increase the accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and effectiveness of the procedure. In some embodiments, the dynamic changes in the stimulus may only be observed using the central portion of a subject's visual field. Embodiments may be implemented using a computerized display with appropriate software routines according to methods disclosed herein. Computer based systems for implementing visual restoration therapy are commercialized by the assignee, NovaVision Inc. of Boca Raton, Fla. U.S. Pat. No. 6,464,356 and U.S. Patent Application publication nos. 2005-0213033, 2006-0092377, 2006-0283466, 2007-0038142 all disclose computer based systems for visual restoration therapy and are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
In related embodiments of the invention, a dynamic stimulus is used as a peripheral spot stimulus for purposes of visual field mapping or therapy. The dynamic peripheral stimulus is presented upon a region of a display to target a corresponding peripheral region of the visual field and preferentially activates the motion-detecting cells and/or structures (e.g., the M pathway) in that region of the visual field. When used with visual restoration therapy, perimetry, or campimetry, the dynamic peripheral stimulus allows measurement and/or therapeutic stimulation of motion-detection pathway function. Unlike stimuli of the prior art that move in a pattern across all or large portions of the visual field, dynamic peripheral stimuli of the present invention are confined to subregions of the visual field in a manner that makes them compatible with targeted stimulation of the M pathway in small regions that may be defined or located with respect to a fixation stimulus. Embodiments include using dynamic peripheral stimuli that are “animations” within narrowly bounded zones that are of a size comparable to traditional spot stimuli and moving the bounds of the animation to a second location. Patient responses to the animated stimuli may be recorded upon presentation of each dynamic peripheral stimulus.
The repetition between the base and alternate stimuli may cycle, for example, at a frequency between 0.5 and 100 Hz, and more particularly may be between 1 Hz and 10 Hz. For example, the cycle may have a frequency of about 3 Hz, with stimuli presented for period of about 150 ms. However, the cycles need not be regular; the delay between changes in the stimulus may vary from cycle to cycle, but the majority of such delays are typically consistent with the above ranges to allow for sustained sensitization. The delays could increase with time, decrease with time, follow a pseudo-random sequence, or other pattern. For example, the sequence of delays could be 210 ms, 240 ms, 275 ms, 255 ms, etc.
As shown in
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the timing of the translational movement may be performed at a variety of regular, or irregular timings; by way of example, the timing is based on a regular cycle of 2 Hz. In other words, the stimulus 300 is translated about every 250 ms. The following table lists the position, time and color of the stimulus, and corresponding figures:
In a specific embodiment, the test cue stimulus 600 is closely matched to the fixation stimulus in terms of luminosity. By closely matching the luminance of the test cue 600 and a fixation stimulus 500, the patient's fixation may be more precisely ascertained, and consequently, the patient may be forced to fixate more precisely upon the stimulus 500. Experimental data show that isoluminous test cues are visible only within about 2 degrees of visual angle. Conversely, if the test cue 600 varied greatly in luminance from the fixation stimulus 500, then a patient could detect the fixation change at greater angles, e.g., 6°, 10°, or even 15° off the line of proper fixation. The luminance of the test cue 600 may vary from the luminance of the base stimulus 500 by a value that is 10%, 5% or less of the base pattern luminance. For example, a test cue stimulus 600 may cycle between colors that are distinguishable when substantially isoluminous; e.g., a yellow test cue stimulus 600 having a luminance of 200 millicandela per square meter and a green fixation stimulus 500 pattern of 190 millicandela per square meter.
If the striations are sufficiently narrow in width, a subject should only be able to resolve the striations by using the central 1-2° of their visual field. As a result, loss of fixation will alter the striated appearance of the stimulus 700. Thus, the subject will be alerted very quickly if his or her fixation has wandered off target. Additionally, such high resolution features may be used with various embodiments of the invention as highly accurate test cues since such test cues should not be detectable using peripheral vision. Use of these test cues may result in increased accuracy in testing subject fixation, and may yield corresponding improvements in testing and training results.
Many variations of the stimulus 700 may be employed. For example, varying colors, patterns or other visually detectable properties may be used, including alternating between more than two such properties (e.g., changing points or regions from red to yellow, or green). While the use of sine waves and square waves described above implies alteration between two fixed levels, the levels may change with time in a pre-defined or semi-random manner.
In related embodiments of the present invention, dynamic stimuli like the dynamic fixation stimuli of
In embodiments, a subject is tasked with fixating on a central fixation stimulus (static or dynamic) and responding to the appearance of a peripheral spot stimulus. The peripheral spot stimulus has a movement element to the presentation to cause preferential detection by the motion sensitive portion of the visual pathway (a “dynamic peripheral stimulus”). However, the peripheral spot stimulus is still a “spot” in the sense that is presented within bounds that define a fraction of the visual field comparable to the fraction of a visual field that might be stimulated by a static spot stimulus. Thus, the stimulus may be an animation within narrowly defined bounds, i.e., bounds that are substantially less than the visual field of the subject. For example, the bounds may correspond to 5%, 3%, or 1% or the patient's visual filed. The dynamic peripheral stimulus may be a single spot or coherent group of spots or objects. The stimulus may be adjustable in size, brightness, hue, frequency or other parameter. The dynamic peripheral stimulus may be used to map the visual field through perimetry or campimetry, to stimulate visual field region in a visual restoration therapy session, or both. Accordingly, user input may be collected to indicate perception of the dynamic peripheral spot stimuli.
A base peripheral stimulus is presented at the selected location (step 810). Like the above-described fixation stimuli, the stimulus is then altered to target a different retinal region (step 820). The subject's motion-sensitive visual pathway may detect this alteration. Steps 810 and 820 may be repeated a given number of times while awaiting a response from the subject (step 830). Optionally, if there is no response from the subject an additional characteristic (e.g., luminosity, contrast, motion frequency, or hue) of the dynamic peripheral stimulus may be altered; when used for campimetry, a multidimensional motion-sensitive visual-field map may be thereby created. Upon receiving a response from the subject or reaching a time-out or other termination condition, a new location is chosen (step 800). This process (steps 800-830) is repeated until a visual-field map of sufficient detail is created, or until therapy is complete.
By stimulating visual-field regions that do not respond to static stimuli, dynamic peripheral stimuli may be useful for testing and treating subjects that have not optimally responded to other stimuli, and for use with patients having extremely poor vision (e.g., end stage glaucoma, optic atrophy, or retinitis pigmentosa). Dynamic peripheral stimulus may be incorporated as a feature into existing perimeters.
An isoluminous circular spot of small angular subtense (e.g. 11 pixels on an LCD monitor) is programmed to appear at pre-determined locations within the testing or therapy area of the applicable device. The circular spot of light “blinks” on and off at a pre-determined frequency but does not deviate from its original location.
Two small (e.g. 5 pixels on an LCD screen), vertically elongated ellipses of light (paired side-by side) appear at a pre-determined location within the testing or therapy area and alternate illumination at a pre-determined frequency (e.g., right-left-right-left . . . ). The stimulus is modulated in appearance to trigger the percept of motion but the stimulus remains fixed in its location until detection or a pre-determined length of time.
In another embodiment of the invention, a frequency doubling grating may be used as a fixation stimulus in a way that creates an optical illusion.
Due to disease, injury, genetic or other source of variation, different subjects vary in terms of their spatial resolution ability. Therefore, an individualized spatial frequency tuning may be beneficial before beginning testing or training. By tuning the spatial frequency of the grating 850, the subject will be forced to maintain a tighter fixation.
Since the grating 850 is presented at a high flicker rate, the subject's retina may be desensitized to the striations. To avoid desensitization, the grating 850 may be systematically perturbed to alternately stimulate different retinal regions; e.g., rotated or translated, as in the embodiments described with reference to
In alternative embodiments, the disclosed methods for vision fixation, testing and training may be implemented as a computer program product for use with a computer system. Such implementations may include a series of computer instructions fixed either on a tangible medium, such as a computer readable medium (e.g., a diskette, CD-ROM, ROM, or fixed disk) or transmittable to a computer system, via a modem or other interface device, such as a communications adapter connected to a network over a medium. The medium may be either a tangible medium (e.g., optical or analog communications lines) or a medium implemented with wireless techniques (e.g., microwave, infrared, laser or other transmission techniques). The series of computer instructions embodies all or part of the functionality previously described herein with respect to the system. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that such computer instructions can be written in a number of programming languages for use with many computer architectures or operating systems.
Furthermore, such instructions may be stored in any memory device, such as semiconductor, magnetic, optical or other memory devices, and may be transmitted using any communications technology, such as optical, infrared, microwave, laser or other transmission technologies. It is expected that such a computer program product may be distributed as a removable medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (e.g., shrink wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (e.g., on system ROM or fixed disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over the network (e.g., the Internet or World Wide Web). Of course, some embodiments of the invention may be implemented as a combination of both software (e.g., a computer program product) and hardware. Still other embodiments of the invention are implemented as entirely hardware, or entirely software (e.g., a computer program product).
The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.
This patent application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/833,199 filed on Jul. 25, 2006 and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/867,499 filed on Nov. 28, 2006, which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1463847 | Shilling | Aug 1923 | A |
| 2213484 | Briggs | Sep 1940 | A |
| 3883234 | Lynn et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 4260227 | Munnerlyn et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4408846 | Balliet | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4421392 | Pitts Crick et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4429961 | Sheingorn | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4533221 | Trachtman | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4660945 | Trachtman | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4679920 | Takashi et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4971434 | Ball | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4995717 | Damato | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5035500 | Rorabaugh et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5050982 | Meissner | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5088810 | Galanter et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5139323 | Schillo | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5147284 | Fedorov et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5191367 | Salibello et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5206671 | Eydelman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5241332 | Farrell | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5305027 | Patterson | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5321445 | Fossetti | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5325136 | Salibello et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5363154 | Galanter et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5455643 | Ki-Ho | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5534953 | Schmielau | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539481 | Vax | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539482 | James et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550602 | Braeuning | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5565949 | Kasha, Jr. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5883692 | Agonis et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5886770 | Damato | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5912723 | Maddess | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5946075 | Horn | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5991085 | Rallison et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6061593 | Fischell et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6062687 | Lofgren-Nisser | May 2000 | A |
| 6286960 | Tomita | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6290357 | Massengill et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6321338 | Porras et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6359601 | Maguire, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364486 | Ball et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6386706 | McClure et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6406437 | Zur et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6431708 | Krebs | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6443977 | Jaillet | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6464356 | Sabel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6519703 | Joyce | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6540355 | Couture | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6578966 | Fink et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6592221 | Stregova | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6656131 | Alster et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6688746 | Malov | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6742892 | Liberman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6769770 | Fink et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6926660 | Miller | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6990377 | Gliner | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7004912 | Polat | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7104659 | Grier et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7220000 | Alster et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7275830 | Alster et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7309128 | Cappo et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7367671 | Sabel | May 2008 | B2 |
| 20020024634 | Fink et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020047987 | Massengill et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087201 | Firlik et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107960 | Wetherall et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186179 | Knowles | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030020873 | Fink et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090439 | Spitzer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156254 | Turovetsky | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214630 | Winterbotham | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040012758 | Lin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040046934 | Sponsel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040051848 | Gotze et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040075811 | Liberman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100616 | Eremeev | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040257528 | Miyake et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050001980 | Spector | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004624 | Gliner et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050041208 | Winterbotham | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050122477 | Alster et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213033 | Sabel | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213034 | Nagayoshi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213035 | Yoshimeki et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060092377 | Sabel et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060283466 | Sabel | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060288258 | Lo et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060290885 | Covannon et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070038142 | Todd et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070121070 | Alster et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070171372 | Seal et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070182928 | Sabel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070216865 | Sabel et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080013047 | Todd et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024724 | Todd | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043201 | Todd | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077437 | Mehta et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 9305147 | Apr 1994 | DE |
| 10207839 | Sep 2002 | DE |
| 115263 | Aug 1984 | EP |
| 128783 | Dec 1984 | EP |
| 135736 | Aug 1985 | EP |
| 0242723 | Oct 1987 | EP |
| 0537945 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 544631 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 689822 | Jan 1996 | EP |
| 775464 | May 1997 | EP |
| 830839 | Mar 1998 | EP |
| 1186271 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1236432 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1236433 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1384462 | Jan 2004 | EP |
| 1402869 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1403680 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1465561 | Feb 1977 | GB |
| WO 8000405 | Mar 1980 | WO |
| WO 8810088 | Dec 1988 | WO |
| WO 9100553 | Jan 1991 | WO |
| WO 9110393 | Jul 1991 | WO |
| WO 9200037 | Jan 1992 | WO |
| WO 9517227 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| WO 9700653 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO 9811819 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO 9849992 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9952419 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 9959461 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO 0012042 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0036971 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0113859 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 0145630 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 0147463 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0180808 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 0209578 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002039754 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 2006002070 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 02053072 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 03002070 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03002190 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03007944 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03020195 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO 03041630 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 03065964 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 03092482 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 03092570 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 03098529 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004066900 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005004985 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005037177 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005044096 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005063153 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005092270 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005110326 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005122872 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006002070 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 0239754 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006006563 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007003902 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007109724 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008077440 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20080043201 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60833199 | Jul 2006 | US | |
| 60867499 | Nov 2006 | US |
