The present invention relates to a dynamic mixer.
Dynamic mixers are known which comprise two elements which are rotatable relative to each other about a predetermined axis and between which is defined a flow path extending between an inlet for materials to be mixed and an outlet. In the known mixers, the flow path is defined between surfaces of the elements each of which surfaces has cavities formed within it. Cavities formed in one surface are offset in the axial direction relative to cavities in the other surface, and cavities in one surface overlap in the axial direction with cavities in the other surface. As a result, material moving between the surfaces is transferred between overlapping cavities. Thus, in use, material to be mixed is moved between the elements and traces a path through cavities located alternately on each of the two surfaces. The bulk of the material to be mixed passes through a shear zone in the material generated by displacement of the surfaces. Such mixers incorporating cavities are generally referred to as “cavity transfer mixers”.
Cavity transfer mixers normally have a cylindrical geometry, that is an inner element having a generally cylindrical outer surface and which generally forms a rotor of the device and an outer element having a generally cylindrical inner surface which generally forms a stator of the device. Rows of cavities are formed in the two facing cylindrical surfaces, the rows of cavities overlapping in the axial direction such that material to be mixed generally passes from a cavity in one row of one surface into a cavity in an adjacent row of the other surface. Such conventional cylindrical cavity transfer mixers generally comprise a solid inner rotor which is housed within a split outer stator, it being necessary to manufacture the outer stator in splittable form so as to enable the formation of rows of cavities in the outer stator. The maximum outer diameter of the inner element is less than the minimum inner diameter of the outer element and therefore the mixer can be assembled relatively easily simply by axial insertion of the inner rotor into the outer stator. Given the relative dimensions of the inner and outer elements however an open annular space is defined between the two components.
Problems have been experienced with cylindrical-geometry cavity transfer mixers. In particular, material can pass straight through the annular space defined between the two elements without entering the cavities. This is a particular problem with materials of relatively low viscosity. For example, when materials of dissimilar viscosity are being mixed, materials of relatively low viscosity can effectively short circuit the cavities by travelling straight through the annular space.
A further problem with cylindrical geometry cavity transfer mixers is that asymmetrical transfers can be generated which cause axial back flow or front flow that can generate stagnation patterns with the result that material can become deposited or “hang-up” in the cavities. This is a particular problem when mixing reacting materials and can result in material degradation and uneven flow rates.
Further disadvantageous features of cylindrical geometry cavity transfer mixers is that they are not self pumping or self cleaning. Given that the material flow path through the cavities cannot be directly observed, it is difficult to be sure that material has not become deposited within the cavities. If material does become deposited in one of the cavities, it is difficult to clean out unless the outer element of the structure is split, and even then cleaning is not a simple process.
The formation of cavities on the inner surface of the outer member is difficult to achieve unless the outer member is splittable and as a result manufacturing costs are high. Furthermore, given that the outer element is generally splittable for manufacture and cleaning, leakage can occur through joints in the outer element. These problems have severely, restricted the application of cylindrical geometry cavity transfer mixers.
It is known from for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,680,132 that cavity transfer mixers may have a planar geometry in which the cavities are formed in opposed planar surfaces rather than in opposed cylindrical surfaces. Such a planar geometry makes manufacture of the cavities in the opposed surfaces and cleaning of deposited material from the cavities relatively easier as compared with cylindrical geometries. Problems associated with material bypassing or being deposited within the cavities remain.
It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the problems outlined above.
According to the present invention, there is provided a dynamic mixer comprising two elements which are rotatable relative to each other about a predetermined axis and between which is defined a flow path extending between an inlet for material to be mixed and an outlet, wherein the flow path is defined between surfaces of the elements each of which surfaces defines a series of annular projectors centred on he predetermined axis, the surfaces are positioned such that projections defined by one element extend towards spaces between projections defined by the other element, cavities are formed in each surface to define flow passages bridging the projections, cavities formed in one surface being offset in the axial direction relative to cavities in the other surface, and cavities in one source overlapping in the axial direction with cavities in the other surface such that material moving between the surfaces from the inlet to the outlet is transferred between overlapping cavities.
Preferably that the projections overlap in the direction perpendicular to the flow path so that projections on one element extend into spaces between projections on the other. With such an arrangement there is no free annular space linearly connecting inlet and outlet between the two relatively rotating elements. Whether or not there is such overlap, the probability of material bypassing the cavities defined in he projections is reduced as compared with a conventional cavity transfer mixer. Material entering a cavity in one direction is in effect redirected to exit that cavity in a different direction. Furthermore the juxtaposition of the cavities in adjacent projections is such that material to be mixed is substantially compelled to transfer from a cavity in one projection to a cavity in the adjacent projection, thereby ensuring that material to be mixed passes alternately between cavities in the two elements. The mixer thus provides a highly effective and efficient distributive mixing action.
Each projection may have an array of circumferentially spaced cavities formed with it. Each of the cavities may be part spherical or of any other geometric form suitable to define a flow path. In addition, each or some of the cavities may be branched such that material flowing along the flow passage defined by a cavity in a single projection is divided into separate streams before it exits that flow passage, or separate streams of material in different branches are combined.
Each projection may be defined by side surfaces each of which is a surface of revolution swept out by a straight or curved line rotated about the axis. For example, one of the two side surfaces of each projection may define a cylindrical surface centred on the axis. The other side surface could be perpendicular to the axis. The side surfaces may be arranged such that the gap between adjacent projections except where cavities are provided is substantially constant throughout the flow path. Other surface configurations are of course possible, e.g. a surface of revolution swept by one or more curved lines or by more than two straight lines.
The surfaces of elements which define the projections may be generally conical with the projections shaped such that an inner conical element can be positioned within an outer conical element by relative displacement between the two elements in a direction parallel to the rotation axis. Such an arrangement facilitates assembly without requiring one of the elements to be splittable into two halves and also makes it relatively easy to machine or otherwise form the projections and the cavities in the projections. Means may be provided for axially displacing the elements relative to each other during use to control the spacing between the generally conical surfaces. One surface may be defined by a inner surface of a hollow outer member and the other surface may be defined by an outer surface of a solid inner member, the inlet being defined in the outer member. Alternatively that arrangement could be reversed such that the inner member is hollow and the inlet is defined in the inner member. The two elements may define a double cone with a first section of the elements tapering outwards from the inlet and a second section of the elements tapering inwards to the outlet.
Adjacent projections may define different numbers, sizes or shapes of cavities. At least one element may support an impeller to provide a pumping effect when the two elements are rotated relative to each other.
The present invention also provides a method of mixing using an apparatus as defined above, operating at a relatively low speed to produce laminar flow conditions which will result in good distributive and low stress mixing.
The present invention further provides a method of mixing using an apparatus as defined above operating at a relatively high speed to produce turbulent flow conditions which will result in effective dispersive mixing.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which;
Referring to
The rotor 1 supports four projections 12 each of which is defined between a first annular planar surface 13 which is perpendicular to the axis 10 and a second cylindrical surface 14 which is centred to the axis 10. Thus the surfaces 11 and 14 are volumes of revolution swept out by lines parallel to the axis 10 and rotated about that axis. Similarly, the surfaces 9 and 13 are surfaces of revolution swept out by lines perpendicular to the axis 10 and rotated about that axis.
It will be appreciated that a small gap is defined between the opposed surfaces of the projections 8 and 12. That gap is not however linear and therefore material passing from the inlet 6 to the outlet 7 cannot follow a linear path. In addition to this general, configuration however a series of cavities is provided in each of the projections 8 and 12. These cavities are not shown in
Referring to
Referring to
The gap between the two relatively rotating elements where no cavities are provided results in a highly effective and efficient dispersive mixing action by subjecting the material to be mixed to intensive shear stresses. Adjustment of the relative axial positions of the rotor 1 and stator 5 although not possible in the arrangement shown in
The flow path of material passing through the gap between the elements is dominated by the movement of the majority of the material passing from a flow passage defined by a cavity in one projection on one element to a flow passage defined by a cavity in an adjacent projection on the other element. This action prevents material from passing through the mixer without entering the flow passages defined by the cavities.
The mixer comprises interfacial surfaces at varying distances from the axis of rotation. The difference in the kinetic energy imparted by these surfaces to a material being mixed provides a motive force to the material that tends to propel it through the mixer. The result is a pumping action which reduces the possibility of material becoming lodged within the mixer. It will be appreciated that the arrangement could be reversed however such that the material is forced, by some external pumping means, to flow radially inwards, reversing the inlet and outlet. In such circumstances the inherent centrifugal pumping action provides back pressure and a more intensive mixing action. An application of such an a arrangement would be as an in-line mixer in which some degree of back-mixing is required.
The flow passages defied by the cavities can be shaped to increase the pumping action and the propulsive forces thus obtained ran be used to pump material through the mixer and to empty the mixer at the end of its mixing operation. As a result this pumping action makes it possible to use the mixer both as an in-line mixing device and a batch mixing device.
A structure such as that illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment the flow passages are part-spherical but it will be appreciated that different cavity shapes, sizes and numbers could be provided having either curved or rectilinear sides.
Given that the number and/or size and/or shape of the cavities may be varied as between adjacent projections, generally in accordance with the pitch circle radius of the projections around the axis of rotation, the material to be mixed is forced to split into different streams as it passes through the mixer. This insures a relatively good mixing performance. Each of the flow passages presents a well defined entrance zone and exit zone to material passing from the inlet to the outlet. The relative sizes of these entrance and exit zones could be controlled so at to be different within one cavity, within one row of cavities, or between rows of cavities. This ability to vary the relative sizes between entrances and exits to cavities enables the local flow characteristics to be adjusted to provide varying flow velocities and pressures. For example, decreasing the local cross-sectional area of a flow passage defined by a cavity would increase the velocity of the flow through the cavity and decrease its pressure. The ability to vary the relative sizes between entrances and exits also permits the material flowing from a relatively large exit to be more finely divided by compelling it to flow into relatively smaller entrances defined by de downstream cavities. This enables the distributive and dispersive mixing characteristics to be adjusted and optimised. This effect may be further enhanced by causing an individual cavity to be branched between its entrance and exit. Thus a number of entrances may be joined to a single exit, or a single entrance may be joined to a number of exits. This would further increase the distributive mixing action obtained by combining the streams of material passing through individual cavities either within or between adjacent cavities.
In the embodiment of
In an alternative arrangement illustrated in
Various advantages arise with the mixer in accordance with the present invention as compared with conventional cylindrical configuration cavity transfer mixers. In particular, the projections define a large number of mutually inclined surfaces which ensure inter-cavity transfers between the two mutually rotating elements. The projections define a large number of cutting edges and the absence of an open annular space between the two elements ensures that all the material to be mixed is exposed to active mixing. Inter-cavity transfers can be achieved at low turbulence/low shear if required. Equally, inter-cavity transfers at high turbulence/high shear can be achieved if required. With mixers in accordance with the invention in which a generally conical structure is provided and the number and/or size and/or shape of cavities per projection varies, the differences between the cavities of adjacent projections as the material progresses through the mixer can be such as to ensure material is forced to split into different streams as it passes between adjacent projections. It will be appreciated however that a generally cylindrical or generally planar configuration could be provided, and such arrangements could also have different numbers, sizes and shapes of cavities in adjacent projections. The shear rates and stresses may be readily adjusted by appropriate dimensional adjustments made either at the time of manufacture or during use.
As noted above, different cavity shapes may be used to adjust characteristics. The cavity shapes can be selected for example to maximise centrifugal pumping action, even to the extent of being curved into the form of vanes in the manner of a conventional centrifugal pump. Cavity shapes can also be selected to optimise vortex formation within any individual cavity and interactions between such vortices, to optimise flow velocities and pressures, and to enhance the degree of distributive mixing between consecutive projections. Gaps could be provided between adjacent projections to ensure that additional blending zones are defined which generate multiple vortices. This can be achieved simply by omitting one of the projections from a central section of the embodiment of
Designs may be compact to make it possible to achieve a low-pressure drop through the mixer. Mixers can be designed to optimise self-cleaning through centrifugal pumping action. With conical arrangements manufacture is relatively simple. Monolithic constructions may be provided to avoid problems with sealing splittable components. The designs can be mechanically robust, can be provided with additional injection ports (such a post is shown in the stator 5 of the embodiment of
Referring to
When the assembly shown in
In the embodiment of the invention illustrated in
Referring to
Referring now to
As mentioned above, although in all the above described embodiments of the invention cavities of a part spherical configuration are formed in the projections, other cavity configurations are possible, for example those illustrated in
The arrangement shown in
Referring to the embodiments of
In all of the embodiments described above, the annular surfaces of the projections in which the cavities are formed could be considered as being swept out by straight lines rotated about the axis of rotation of the device. Alternative configurations are possible however such that rather than the projections being swept out by notional straight lines the projections are swept out by notional curved lines.
Referring to
Referring to
It will be appreciated that mixing devices in accordance with the present invention could be combined with auxiliary equipment, for example arrangement to cut material into smaller pieces prior to mixing. One possibility for example would be to introduce into the region immediately below the hollow inner rotary member of the embodiment of
The apparatus of the present invention is extremely versatile and can be used in many different applications. For example, the apparatus can be used in all fluid to fluid mixing and fluid to solid mixing applications, including solids that exhibit fluid-like flow behaviour. The fluids may be liquids and gases delivered in single and multiple streams. The apparatus can be used for all dispersive and distributive mixing operations including emulsifying, homogenizing, blending, incorporating, suspending, dissolving, heating, size reducing, reacting, wetting, hydrating, aerating and gasifying for example. The apparatus can be applied in either batch or continuous (in line) operations. Thus the apparatus could be used to replace conventional cavity transfer mixers, or to replace standard industrial high shear mixers. The apparatus could also be used in domestic as well as industrial applications.
The apparatus enables performance levels to be achieved which are far better than those of current state of the art mixers. This is immediate relevance in term of the rate and extent of particle size reduction (fluid and/or solid) and the rate of blending, particularly the incorporation of powders into liquids.
Examples of industries in which the apparatus of the present invention can be applied are bulk chemicals, fine chemicals, petro chemicals, agro chemicals, food, drink, pharmaceuticals, healthcare products, personal care products, industrial and domestic care products, packaging, paints, polymers, water and waste treatment.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0027623.8 | Nov 2000 | GB | national |
0120174.8 | Aug 2001 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB01/04670 | 10/19/2001 | WO | 00 | 9/12/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/38263 | 5/16/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2159670 | Neitzke | May 1939 | A |
2278051 | Ambrose | Mar 1942 | A |
2321599 | Hofmann | Jun 1943 | A |
2591966 | Rider | Apr 1952 | A |
2627394 | Spencer | Feb 1953 | A |
2645464 | Forbes | Jul 1953 | A |
2706108 | Miner | Apr 1955 | A |
2731253 | Spencer | Jan 1956 | A |
2995346 | Samples | Aug 1961 | A |
3081069 | Oakes | Mar 1963 | A |
3231242 | Schrier | Jan 1966 | A |
3709664 | Krekeler et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3845938 | Schold | Nov 1974 | A |
4092738 | Doom | May 1978 | A |
4128342 | Renk | Dec 1978 | A |
4176972 | Stiling | Dec 1979 | A |
4231666 | Baron | Nov 1980 | A |
4431482 | Heinbockel et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4610548 | Hallet et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
5088831 | Reinhall | Feb 1992 | A |
5141328 | Dilley | Aug 1992 | A |
5902042 | Imaizumi et al. | May 1999 | A |
6648500 | Fedorov et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651839 | Kriebel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6866412 | Bachelier et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
20040052156 | Brown | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
355770 | Jul 1961 | CH |
355771 | Jul 1961 | CH |
2256900 | May 1973 | DE |
3938306 | May 1991 | DE |
2446667 | Aug 1990 | FR |
59-166231 | Sep 1984 | JP |
63-49239 | Mar 1988 | JP |
5-15756 | Jan 1993 | JP |
5-15757 | Jan 1993 | JP |
5-15758 | Jan 1993 | JP |
5-15759 | Jan 1993 | JP |
6-285354 | Oct 1994 | JP |
8-141378 | Jun 1996 | JP |
11-90212 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2002-301363 | Oct 2002 | JP |
8001469 | Jul 1980 | WO |
8100816 | Apr 1981 | WO |
0238263 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040052156 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |