Dynamic Information Retrieval System for XML-Compliant Data

Abstract

Data that is in a tagged format, such as XML, is dynamically accessed on demand, without the requirement for pre-parsing documents containing the data and storing it in a database. A dynamic processor discovers and processes taxonomy documents pertinent to a data request by traversing linked relationships between documents. Pre-stored algorithms in the dynamic processor are used to retrieve the relevant data items from the documents.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the architecture of a system for accessing XBRL-formatted documents;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating the components of the dynamic processor;

FIGS. 3A-3E illustrate examples of the display of results returned from a query; and

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of and exemplary architecture for a dynamic form generator.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

To facilitate an understanding of the concepts underlying the present invention, they are described hereinafter with reference to their implementation in the context of accessing information contained in XBRL-formatted documents. It will be appreciated, however, that this implementation is but one example of the practical applications of the invention. More generally, the invention is applicable to the retrieval of information that is presented in a format containing metadata that identifies each element of information. In particular, the invention is applicable to collections of XML-formatted documents, as well as each of the specific implementations of XML, such as XBRL. The following discussion should therefore be viewed as illustrative, without limiting the scope of the invention.

FIG. 1 illustrates the basic architecture of a system for access to XBRL documents, which implements the present invention. The fundamental components of the system comprise a repository 10 containing the XBRL documents, an application programming interface (API) 12 via which a user enters requests for information contained in those documents, and receives responses to the requests, and a dynamic processor 14 that is responsive to a request received via the API, to retrieve information from the documents, and return it via the API 12.

XBRL is comprised of two fundamental components, namely an instance document 16, which contains business and financial facts, and a collection of Taxomomies, which define metadata about these facts. Each business fact 18 comprises a single value. In addition to facts, an instance document might contain contexts, which define the entity to which the fact applies, the period of time to which it pertains, and/or whether the fact is actual, projected, budgeted, etc. The instance document might also contain units that define the unit of measurement for the numeric facts that are presented within the document, as well as footnotes providing additional information about the fact, and references to Taxonomies.

The Taxonomies comprise a collection of XML Schema documents 20 and XLink linkbase documents 22. A schema defines facts by means of elements 24. For example, an element might indicate what type of data a fact contains, e.g., monetary, numeric, textual, etc.

A linkbase is a collection of links. A link contains locators, that provide arbitrary labels for elements, and arcs 26, which indicate that an element links to another element, by referencing the labels defined by the locators.

A more detailed view of the dynamic processor is illustrated in FIG. 2. A request for information is presented to the API 12. This request, in the form of query, can be of a variety of different types. For example, one type of query might request a particular item of data for a number of different companies, e.g., annual revenue for all companies in the beverage industry. Another type of query may request all data for a given company of interest, or data over a particular time span, such as the ten-year revenue growth for a particular company. The API presents these requests to the dynamic processor 14, for example, in the form of a function call with parameters that identify the particular items of interest in the request.

The dynamic processor contains a number of pre-fabricated algorithms that are executed by an algorithm manager 28. Each algorithm is designed to retrieve information in response to a particular type of request. In essence, each algorithm implements a particular type of search strategy. For example, one algorithm can function to retrieve all items from a collection of documents, e.g., all data relating to a particular company. Another algorithm can function to retrieve the metadata associated with a particular fact.

The algorithms perform multi-step processes to first examine the metadata to obtain information about the semantics and structure of the instance documents, and then retrieve the appropriate metadata and data items from the XBRL documents that are responsive to the request. An illustrative example of the process performed by the algorithms is set forth hereinafter in the context of a request to provide the balance sheet of a designated entity.

1. In response to the request, the algorithm which corresponds to that type of request sends a query, for example using an XQuery language component 30, to a presentation linkbase in the Taxonomies, to locate presentation links that correspond to the sections of a balance sheet. It should be noted that, due to the extensible nature of XBRL, the Taxonomies that are applicable to a given filing could comprise multiple sets of Taxonomy documents. There could be a standard Taxonomy that is associated with the entity to which filings are presented. For instance, the SEC might establish a standard Taxonomy containing presentation links for balance sheet data. The documents for this standard Taxonomy might be stored in a known location within the repository. In addition, the entity submitting a filing could include custom Taxonomy documents with the instance documents that it submits. The custom Taxonomy constitutes an extension of the standard Taxonomy established by the SEC. In operation, the algorithm first goes to the standard Taxonomy to locate the appropriate presentation links.

2. Once the presentation links have been located, the algorithm then identifies concepts that are referenced by the presentation links, e.g. assets, current assets, non-current assets, etc.

3. Using these concepts and entities, and any other qualifiers such as specific date or date range, the algorithm employs an XML document retriever 32 to locate corresponding items in the instance documents.

4. As a result of these steps, the algorithm discovers instance documents that contain the relevant data. In some cases, these documents may point to links in custom Taxonomies. In such a situation, these custom links are merged with the standard links, to obtain additional concepts.

5. Using the concepts, presentation links and preferred label attributes contained in the presentation links, the algorithm locates labels for the data in a label linkbase.

6. The algorithm returns the labels, presentation structure and data, e.g. numbers, to the API, to be formatted and presented to the user.

As an alternative to using XQuery, the dynamic processor can employ a different technology such as SAX (Simple API for XML) or XML Pull Parsing, or a combination of such technologies, to retrieve information from the XBRL instance documents and Taxonomy documents.

The dynamic processor preferably includes a cache 33 for storing information that has been retrieved and returned via the API. This cached data can be used to reduce the time needed to respond to subsequent requests that seek some, or all, of the information that was returned in response to a previous request, and thereby eliminate duplicate processing. When a request is received, the algorithm manager 28 first checks the cache, to determine if a valid response to the request is present. If so, the response is retrieved from the cache, and immediately provided to the API in response to the request.

Examples of responses that might be displayed to a user are illustrated in FIGS. 3A-3E. In this particular example, the user has requested the latest filing of a 8-K Statement at the SEC for a particular company. FIG. 3A illustrates the initial screen that is presented to the user. This view presents a first-level listing of the sections of the statement. Each of these section headings are identified in the metadata for the filing, e.g. presentation links.

FIGS. 3B-3D illustrate views with progressively greater levels of detail in the first section “Statement of Financial Position”, under the heading for “Assets”, and numerical values corresponding to the various categories of assets. These numerical values, along with any dates to which they correspond and units of measurement, are retrieved from the instance documents themselves, whereas the displayed names for the asset categories are obtained from the metadata documents. Rather than select each successive level individually, the user can choose to expand and view all categories of data in the section at once, by selecting an appropriate button 34, as shown in FIG. 3E.

In addition to retrieving data items that are contained in the instance documents and providing them in a view such as those shown in FIGS. 3A-3E, the algorithms in the dynamic processor also have the ability to calculate additional data that does not explicitly appear in the instance documents. For instance, in the example of FIGS. 3A-3E, the instance documents might contain items for each of the individual categories of assets, as shown in the view of FIG. 3D. However, they may not contain an item corresponding to the sum of all of the individual categories of assets, which is shown in FIG. 3B. In this case, the appropriate algorithm refers to the linkbase 22 to locate an equation which defines the items that make up the requested calculation. The algorithm then sends a query requesting each of those items, and sums them to obtain the desired total.

The dynamic processor can be implemented within different software environments. In one implementation, the dynamic processor can reside as a stand alone desktop application, which communicates with one or more repositories of XBRL documents that are accessible via a desktop computer, for example through a network. In another implementation, the dynamic processor can be implemented as a client-server program. For instance, the components illustrated in FIG. 2 might reside in a server that is associated with the information repository, and the API can communicate with a client executing on a computer at a user's site, via HTML. As a third implementation, the data processor might be a web-based application executing on a server that a user accesses through a suitable browser. In each case, the software components that constitute the API and the dynamic processor are encoded on a computer-readable medium that is accessed by the supporting server and/or desktop computer.

In addition to the processing of XBRL documents to retrieve data that is responsive to a request, the technology that underlies the invention can also be employed to generate forms that can be used to create XBRL documents. An example of an architecture for a dynamic form generator is illustrated in FIG. 4.

A form is generated on the basis of a particular taxonomy that is designated by the user. In generating a form, no assumptions are made about the structure of the taxonomy, other than the fact that it conforms to an XML-based specification, e.g. XBRL. Once the user has designated a particular taxonomy 36, and a name for the form, a dynamic form generator 38 within the dynamic processor examines the schema in the taxonomy, using suitable algorithms, to obtain labels that are relevant to the form to be generated. The form 40 is generated with data entry fields 42 that correspond to each label that was obtained from the taxonomy. In addition, the form is provided with XML tags 44 that are associated with each input field, as described by the taxonomy 36.

Once the form is generated, it is resident as a live form, e.g. an XForm, on a network, such as the Internet. This form can then be accessed by a form-enabled application 46, via which a user can enter input data into each field 42, e.g. financial and business data in the case of an XBRL form. The completed form can then be submitted as a new XML instance document 48, and stored at a location designated by the user.

Thus it can be seen that the present invention provides dynamic evaluation of XML documents in response to a request, notwithstanding the diverse amount of metadata that can result with an extensible language. This is accomplished by analyzing the metadata to learn about the structure and semantics that are employed for any given set of XML documents. As a result, the need to pre-parse documents to derive data from them is avoided. Furthermore, forms for creating XML documents can be automatically generated without requiring manual input to designate fields or tags, or to publish the forms.

It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention described herein can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The disclosed implementations are considered in all respects to be illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the invention as indicated by the appended claims, rather than the foregoing description, and all changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalents thereof are intended to be embraced therein.

Claims

1. An system for dynamically retrieving data from a plurality of stored XML-compliant documents in which the data is in a tagged format and has associated metadata, comprising: a processor that includes:a first component that, in response to a request for information, analyzes metadata stored in XML documents to obtain information about the structure and semantics of the documents; anda second component that retrieves data from the stored documents in accordance with the structure and semantics obtained by the first component; andan interface that receives the data that was retrieved from the documents and presents the retrieved data to a requester.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said data is XBRL-formatted data, and said metadata includes XBRL Taxonomies.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein said second component employs at least one of XQuery, XML Pull Parsing, and SAX to retrieve the data from the stored documents.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein said processor includes a plurality of data retrieval algorithms that are respectively associated with different types of requests, and which invoke said first and second components in response to receiving an associated request for data.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein said processor further includes a cache that for storing data that is received in response to a request, and wherein said algorithms function, in response to a subsequent request, to first examine said cache to determine whether it contains data that is responsive to said subsequent request, and if so to provide the data stored in said cache to said interface for presentation to the requester.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein said processor and interface are implemented in a stand-alone computer program.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is implemented as a component of a client-server program.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein said processor and interface are implemented in a network accessible application.

9. The system of claim 1, further including a dynamic forms generator that is responsive to designation of a taxonomy to automatically generate a form containing data entry fields that correspond to labels in the taxonomy, and tags associated with said labels, for the creation of XML documents.

10. A method for dynamically retrieving data from a plurality of stored XML-compliant documents in which the data is in a tagged format and has associated metadata, comprising the following steps: in response to a request for information, analyzing metadata stored in XML documents to obtain information about the structure and semantics of the documents;retrieving data from the stored documents in accordance with the structure and semantics obtained in said analyzing step; andpresenting the retrieved data to a requester.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein said data is XBRL-formatted data, and said metadata includes XBRL Taxonomies.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said retrieving step employs at least one of XQuery, XML Pull Parsing, and SAX to retrieve the data from the stored documents.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein said analyzing and retrieving steps are performed by one of a plurality of data retrieval algorithms that are respectively associated with different types of requests.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein said processor further including the step of storing, in a cache, data that is received in response to a request, and wherein said algorithms function, in response to a subsequent request, to first examine said cache to determine whether it contains data that is responsive to said subsequent request, and if so to provide the data stored in said cache for presentation to the requester.

15. The method of claim 10, further including the step of automatically generating a form containing data entry fields that correspond to labels in the taxonomy, and tags associated with said labels, for the creation of XML documents.

16. A computer-readable medium containing a program that causes a computer to execute the following operations: in response to a request for information, analyzing metadata stored in XML documents to obtain information about the structure and semantics of the documents;retrieving data from the stored documents in accordance with the structure and semantics obtained in said analyzing step; andpresenting the retrieved data to a requester.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein said data is XBRL-formatted data, and said metadata includes XBRL Taxonomies.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein said retrieving operation employs at least one of XQuery, XML Pull Parsing, and SAX to retrieve the data from the stored documents.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein said program includes a plurality of data retrieval algorithms that are respectively associated with different types of requests, and which invoke said analyzing and retrieving operations in response to receiving an associated request for data.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 19 wherein said program further causes a computer to perform the operation of storing, in a cache, data that is received in response to a request, and wherein said algorithms function, in response to a subsequent request, to first examine said cache to determine whether it contains data that is responsive to said subsequent request, and if so to provide the data stored in said cache for presentation to the requestor.

21. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein said program is implemented as a stand-alone computer program.

22. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein said program is implemented as a component of a client-server program.

23. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein said is program is implemented as a network accessible application.

24. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein said program further causes a computer to perform the operation of automatically generating a form containing data entry fields that correspond to labels in the taxonomy, and tags associated with said labels, for the creation of XML documents.