This patent relates generally to the control of boiler systems and in one particular instance to the control and optimization of steam generating boiler systems using dynamic matrix control.
A variety of industrial as well as non-industrial applications use fuel burning boilers which typically operate to convert chemical energy into thermal energy by burning one of various types of fuels, such as coal, gas, oil, waste material, etc. An exemplary use of fuel burning boilers is in thermal power generators, wherein fuel burning boilers generate steam from water traveling through a number of pipes and tubes within the boiler, and the generated steam is then used to operate one or more steam turbines to generate electricity. The output of a thermal power generator is a function of the amount of heat generated in a boiler, wherein the amount of heat is directly determined by the amount of fuel consumed (e.g., burned) per hour, for example.
In many cases, power generating systems include a boiler which has a furnace that burns or otherwise uses fuel to generate heat which, in turn, is transferred to water flowing through pipes or tubes within various sections of the boiler. A typical steam generating system includes a boiler having a superheater section (having one or more sub-sections) in which steam is produced and is then provided to and used within a first, typically high pressure, steam turbine. To increase the efficiency of the system, the steam exiting this first steam turbine may then be reheated in a reheater section of the boiler, which may include one or more subsections, and the reheated steam is then provided to a second, typically lower pressure steam turbine. While the efficiency of a thermal-based power generator is heavily dependent upon the heat transfer efficiency of the particular furnace/boiler combination used to burn the fuel and transfer the heat to the water flowing within the various sections of the boiler, this efficiency is also dependent on the control technique used to control the temperature of the steam in the various sections of the boiler, such as in the superheater section of the boiler and in the reheater section of the boiler.
However, as will be understood, the steam turbines of a power plant are typically run at different operating levels at different times to produce different amounts of electricity based on energy or load demands. For most power plants using steam boilers, the desired steam temperature setpoints at final superheater and reheater outlets of the boilers are kept constant, and it is necessary to maintain steam temperature close to the setpoints (e.g., within a narrow range) at all load levels. In particular, in the operation of utility (e.g., power generation) boilers, control of steam temperature is critical as it is important that the temperature of steam exiting from a boiler and entering a steam turbine is at an optimally desired temperature. If the steam temperature is too high, the steam may cause damage to the blades of the steam turbine for various metallurgical reasons. On the other hand, if the steam temperature is too low, the steam may contain water particles, which in turn may cause damage to components of the steam turbine over prolonged operation of the steam turbine as well as decrease efficiency of the operation of the turbine. Moreover, variations in steam temperature also cause metal material fatigue, which is a leading use of tube leaks.
Typically, each section (i.e., the superheater section and the reheater section) of the boiler contains cascaded heat exchanger sections wherein the steam exiting from one heat exchanger section enters the following heat exchanger section with the temperature of the steam increasing at each heat exchanger section until, ideally, the steam is output to the turbine at the desired steam temperature. In such an arrangement, steam temperature is controlled primarily by controlling the temperature of the water at the output of the first stage of the boiler which is primarily achieved by changing the fuel/air mixture provided to the furnace or by changing the ratio of firing rate to input feedwater provided to the furnace/boiler combination. In once-through boiler systems, in which no drum is used, the firing rate to feedwater ratio input to the system may be used primarily to regulate the steam temperature at the input of the turbines.
While changing the fuel/air ratio and the firing rate to feedwater ratio provided to the furnace/boiler combination operates well to achieve desired control of the steam temperature over time, it is difficult to control short term fluctuations in steam temperature at the various sections of the boiler using only fuel/air mixture control and firing rate to feedwater ratio control. Instead, to perform short term (and secondary) control of steam temperature, saturated water is sprayed into the steam at a point before the final heat exchanger section located immediately upstream of the turbine. This secondary steam temperature control operation typically occurs before the final superheater section of the boiler and/or before the final reheater section of the boiler. To effect this operation, temperature sensors are provided along the steam flow path and between the heat exchanger sections to measure the steam temperature at critical points along the flow path, and the measured temperatures are used to regulate the amount of saturated water sprayed into the steam for steam temperature control purposes.
In many circumstances, it is necessary to rely heavily on the spray technique to control the steam temperature as precisely as needed to satisfy the turbine temperature constraints described above. In one example, once-through boiler systems, which provide a continuous flow of water (steam) through a set of pipes within the boiler and do not use a drum to, in effect, average out the temperature of the steam or water exiting the first boiler section, may experience greater fluctuations in steam temperature and thus typically require heavier use of the spray sections to control the steam temperature at the inputs to the turbines. In these systems, the firing rate to feedwater ratio control is typically used, along with superheater spray flow, to regulate the furnace/boiler system. In these and other boiler systems, a distributed control system (DCS) uses cascaded PID (Proportional Integral Derivative) controllers to control both the fuel/air mixture provided to the furnace as well as the amount of spraying performed upstream of the turbines.
However, cascaded PID controllers typically respond in a reactionary manner to a difference or error between a setpoint and an actual value or level of a dependent process variable to be controlled, such as a temperature of steam to be delivered to the turbine. That is, the control response occurs after the dependent process variable has already drifted from its set point. For example, spray valves that are upstream of a turbine are controlled to readjust their spray flow only after the temperature of the steam delivered to the turbine has drifted from its desired target. Needless to say, this reactionary control response coupled with changing boiler operating conditions can result in large temperature swings that cause stress on the boiler system and shorten the lives of tubes, spray control valves, and other components of the system.
An embodiment of a method for preventing saturated steam from entering a superheater section of a steam generating boiler system may include generating, by a dynamic matrix controller, a control signal based on a signal indicative of a rate of change of a disturbance variable used in the steam generating boiler system. The method may also include obtaining a saturated steam temperature and a temperature of intermediate steam, and determining a magnitude of a difference between the obtained steam temperatures. The temperature of the intermediate steam may be determined upstream of a location at which a temperature of output steam is determined, where the output steam is generated by the steam generating boiler system for delivery to a turbine. The method may further include adjusting the control signal based on the magnitude of the difference between the saturated steam temperature and the intermediate steam temperature, and controlling the temperature of the intermediate steam based on the adjusted control signal.
An embodiment of a fuzzifier unit for use in a steam generating boiler system may comprise a first input to receive a signal indicative of a magnitude of a temperature difference between saturated steam and intermediate steam generated by the steam generating boiler system, and a second input to receive a control signal generated by a dynamic matrix controller, where the control signal corresponds to a rate of change of a disturbance variable used in the steam generating boiler system. A temperature of the intermediate steam may be determined upstream location at which a temperature of output steam is determined, where the output steam is generated by the steam generating boiler system for delivery to a turbine. The fuzzifier unit may also include an adjustment routine that adjusts the control signal based on the magnitude of the temperature difference between the saturated steam and the intermediate steam. Further, the fuzzifier unit may include an output to provide the adjusted control signal to a field device to control the temperature of the intermediate steam.
An embodiment of a steam generating boiler system may comprise a boiler, a field device, and a controller communicatively coupled to the boiler and to the field device. The boiler may include a superheater section. The steam generating boiler system may further comprise a control system communicatively connected to the controller to receive a signal indicative of a disturbance variable used in the steam generating boiler system. The control system may include one or more routines that generate a control signal based on a rate of change of the disturbance variable, a temperature of output steam generated by the superheater section, and a setpoint corresponding to output steam that is delivered to a turbine. The one or more routines included in the control system may also modify the control signal based on a difference between a saturated steam temperature and a temperature of intermediate steam provided to the superheater section, and may provide the modified control signal to the field device to control the temperature of the intermediate steam.
Although the following text sets forth a detailed description of numerous different embodiments of the invention, it should be understood that the legal scope of the invention is defined by the words of the claims set forth at the end of this patent. The detailed description is to be construed as exemplary only and does not describe every possible embodiment of the invention as describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims defining the invention.
In any event, as illustrated in
The water wall absorption section 102, which is primarily responsible for generating steam, includes a number of pipes through which water or steam from the economizer section 114 is heated in the furnace. Of course, feedwater coming into the water wall absorption section 102 may be pumped through the economizer section 114 and this water absorbs a large amount of heat when in the water wall absorption section 102. The steam or water provided at output of the water wall absorption section 102 is fed to the primary superheater absorption section 104, and then to the superheater absorption section 106, which together raise the steam temperature to very high levels. The main steam output from the superheater absorption section 106 drives the high pressure turbine 116 to generate electricity.
Once the main steam drives the high pressure turbine 116, the steam is routed to the reheater absorption section 108, and the hot reheated steam output from the reheater absorption section 108 is used to drive the intermediate pressure turbine 118. The spray sections 110 and 112 may be used to control the final steam temperature at the inputs of the turbines 116 and 118 to be at desired setpoints. Finally, the steam from the intermediate pressure turbine 118 may be fed through a low pressure turbine system (not shown here), to a steam condenser (not shown here), where the steam is condensed to a liquid form, and the cycle begins again with various boiler feed pumps primping the feedwater through a cascade of feedwater heater trains and then an economizer for the next cycle. The economizer section 114 is located in the flow of hot exhaust gases exiting from the boiler and uses the hot gases to transfer additional heat to the feedwater before the feedwater enters the water wall absorption section 102.
As illustrated in
In particular, the control loop 130 includes a first control block 140, illustrated in the form of a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control block, which uses, as a primary input, a setpoint 131A in the form of a factor or signal corresponding to a desired or optimal value of a control variable or a manipulated variable 131A used to control or associated with a section of the boiler system 100. The desired value 131A may correspond to, for example, a desired superheater spray setpoint or an optimal burner tilt position. In other cases, the desired or optimal value 131A may correspond to a damper position of a damper within the boiler system 100, a position of a spray valve, an amount of spray, some other control, manipulated or disturbance variable or combination thereof that is used to control or is associated with the section of the boiler system 100. Generally, the setpoint 131A may correspond to a control variable or a manipulated variable of the boiler system 100, and may be typically set by a user or an operator.
The control block 140 compares the setpoint 131A to a measure of the actual control or manipulated variable 131B currently being used to produce a desired output value. For clarity of discussion,
The operation of the superheater spray section 110 is controlled by the control loop 132. The control loop 132 includes a control block 150 (illustrated in the form of a PID control block) which compares a temperature setpoint for the temperature of the steam at the input to the turbine 116 (typically fixed or tightly set based on operational characteristics of the turbine 116) to a measurement of the actual temperature of the steam at the input of the turbine 116 (reference 151) to produce an output control signal based on the difference between the two. The output of the control block 150 is provided to a summer block 152 which adds the control signal from the control block 150 to a feed forward signal which is developed by a block 154 as, for example, a derivative of a load signal corresponding to an actual or desired load generated by the turbine 116. The output of the summer block 152 is then provided as a setpoint to a further control block 156 (again illustrated as a PID control block), which setpoint indicates the desired temperature at the input to the second superheater section 106 (reference 158). The control block 156 compares the setpoint from the block 152 to an intermediate measurement of the steam temperature 158 at the output of the superheater spray section 110, and, based on the difference between the two, produces a control signal to control the valve 122 which controls the amount of the spray provided in the superheater spray section 110. As used herein, an “intermediate” measurement or value of a control variable or a manipulated variable is determined at a location that is upstream of a location at which a dependent process variable that is desired to be controlled is measured. For example, as illustrated in
Thus, as seen from the PID-based control loops 130 and 132 of
Of course, while the embodiment discussed uses the superheater spray flow amount as an input to the control loop 130, one or more other control related signals or factors could be used as well or in other circumstances as an input to the control loop 130 for developing one or more output control signals to control the operation of the boiler/furnace, and thereby provide steam temperature control. For example, the control block 140 may compare the actual burner tilt positions with an optimal burner tilt position, which may come from off-line unit characterization (especially for boiler systems manufactured by Combustion Engineering) or a separate on-line optimization program or other source. In another example with a different boiler design configuration, if flue gas by-pass damper(s) are used for primary reheater steam temperature control, then the signals indicative of the desired (or optimal) and actual burner tilt positions in the control loop 130 may be replaced or supplemented with signals indicative of or related to the desired (or optimal) and actual damper positions.
Additionally, while the control loop 130 of
Furthermore, as seen from the control loops 130 and 132 of
The balancer unit 170 includes a balancer 172 which provides control signals to a superheater damper control unit 174 as well as to a reheater damper control unit 176 which operate to control the flue gas dampers in the various superheater and the reheater sections of the boiler. As will be understood, the flue gas damper control units 174 and 176 alter or change the damper settings to control the amount of flue gas from the furnace which is diverted to each of the superheater and reheater sections of the boilers. Thus, the control units 174 and 176 thereby control or balance the amount of energy provided to each of the superheater and reheater sections of the boiler. As a result, the balancer unit 170 is the primary control provided on the reheater section 108 to control the amount of energy or heat generated within the furnace 102 that is used in the operation of the reheater section 108 of the boiler system of
Because of temporary or short term fluctuations in the steam temperature, and the fact that the operation of the balancer unit 170 is tied in with operation of the superheater sections 104 and 106 as well as the reheater section 108, the balancer unit 170 may not be able to provide complete control of the steam temperature 163 at the output of the reheater section 108, to assure that the desired steam temperature at this location 161 is attained. As a result, secondary control of the steam temperature 163 at the input of the turbine 118 is provided by the operation of the reheater spray section 112.
In particular, control of the reheater spray section 112 is provided by the operation of the spray setpoint unit 168 and a control block 180. Here, the spray setpoint unit 168 determines a reheater spray setpoint based on a number of factors, taking into account the operation of the balancer unit 170, in well known manners. Typically, however, the spray setpoint unit 168 is configured to operate the reheater spray section 112 only when the operation of the balancer unit 170 cannot provide enough or adequate control of the steam temperature 161 at the input of the turbine 118. In any event, the reheater spray setpoint is provided as a setpoint to the control block 180 (again illustrated as a PID control block) which compares this setpoint with a measurement of the actual steam temperature 161 at the output of the reheater section 108 and produces a control signal based on the difference between these two signals, and the control signal is used to control the reheater spray valve 124. As is known, the reheater spray valve 124 then operates to provide a controlled amount of reheater spray to perform further or additional control of the steam temperature at of the reheater 108.
In some embodiments, the control of the reheater spray section 112 may be performed using a similar control scheme as discussed with respect to
Similar to the PID-based control loops 130 and 132 of
The control system or control scheme 200 may be performed in or may be communicatively coupled with the controller or controller unit 120 of the boiler system 100. For example, in some embodiments, at least a portion of the control system or control scheme 200 may be included in the controller 120. In some embodiments, the entire control system or control scheme 200 may be included in the controller 120.
Indeed, the control system 200 of
In further contrast to the PID-based control loops 130 and 132 of
In particular, the control system or scheme 200 includes a change rate determiner 205 that receives a signal corresponding to a measure of an actual disturbance variable of the control scheme 200 that currently affects a desired operation of the boiler system 100 or a desired output value of a control or dependent process variable 202 of the control scheme 200, similar to the measure of the control or manipulated variable 131B received at the control block 140 of
Furthermore, although only one signal corresponding to a measure of one disturbance variable of the control system or scheme 200 is shown as being received at the change rate determiner 205, in some embodiments, one or more signals corresponding to one or more disturbance variables of the control system or scheme 200 may be received by the change rate determiner 205. However, in contrast to reference 131A of
The change rate determiner 205 is configured to determine a rate of change of the disturbance variable input 208 and to generate a signal 210 corresponding to the rate of change of the input 208.
In particular, the signal 208 corresponding to the sure of the disturbance variable may be received at an input of the first lead lag block 214 that may add a time delay. An output generated by the first lead lag block 214 may be received at a first input difference block 218. The output of the first lead lag block 214 may also be received at an input of the second lead lag block 216 that may add an additional time delay that may be same as or different than the time delay added by the first lead lag block 214. The output of the second lead lag block 216 may be received at a second input of the difference block 218. The difference block 218 may determine a difference between the outputs of the lead lag blocks 214 and 216, and, by using the time delays of the lead lag blocks 214, 216, may determine the slope or the rate of change of the disturbance variable 208. The difference block 218 may generate a signal 210 corresponding to a rate of change of the disturbance variable 208. In some embodiments, one or both of the lead lag blocks 214, 216 may be adjustable to vary their respective time delay. For instance, for a disturbance input 208 that changes more slowly over time, a time delay at one or both lead lag blocks 214, 216 may be increased. In some embodiments, the change rate determiner 205 may collect more than two measures of the signal 208 in order to more accurately calculate the slope or rate of change. Of course,
Turning back to
The signal 210 corresponding to the rate of change of the disturbance variable of the control system or scheme 200 (including any desired gain introduced by the optional gain block 220) may be received at a dynamic matrix control (DMC) block 222. The DMC block 222 may also receive, as inputs, a measure of a current or actual value of the portion of the boiler system 100 to be controlled (e.g., the control or controlled variable of the control system or scheme 200; in the example of
Generally speaking, the model predictive control performed by the DMC block 222 is a multiple-input-single-output (MISO) control strategy in which the effects of changing each of a number of process inputs on each of a number of process outputs is measured and these measured responses are then used to create a model of the process. In some cases, though, a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) control strategy may be employed. Whether MISO or MIMO, the model of the process is inverted mathematically and is then used to control the process output or outputs based on changes made to the process inputs. In some cases, the process model includes or is developed from a process output response curve for each of the process inputs and these curves may be created based on a series of, for example, pseudo-random step changes delivered to each of the process inputs. These response curves can be used to model the process in known manners. Model predictive control is known in the art and, as a result, the specifics thereof will not be described herein. However, model predictive control is described generally in Qin, S. Joe and Thomas A. Badgwell, “An Overview of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology,” AlChE Conference, 1996.
Moreover, the generation and use of advanced control routines such as MPC control routines may be integrated into the configuration process for a controller for the steam generating boiler system. For example, Wojsznis et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,963 entitled “Integrated Advanced Control Blocks in Process Control Systems,” the disclosure of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein, discloses a method of generating an advanced control block such as an advanced controller (e.g., an MPC controller or a neural network controller) using data collected from the process plant when configuring the process plant. More particularly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,963 discloses a configuration system that creates an advanced multiple-input-multiple-output control block within a process control system in a manner that is integrated with the creation of and downloading of other control blocks using a particular control paradigm, such as the Fieldbus paradigm. In this case, the advanced control block is initiated by creating a control block (such as the DMC block 222) having desired inputs and outputs to be connected to process outputs and inputs, respectively, for controlling a process such as a process used in a steam generating boiler system. The control block includes a data collection routine and a waveform generator associated therewith and may have control logic that is not tuned or otherwise undeveloped because this logic is missing tuning parameters, matrix coefficients or other control parameters necessary to be implemented. The control block is placed within the process control system with the defined inputs and outputs communicatively coupled within the control system in the manner that these inputs and outputs would be connected if the advanced control block was being used to control the process. Next, during a test procedure, the control block systematically upsets each of the process inputs via the control block outputs using waveforms generated by the waveform generator specifically designed for use in developing a process model. Then, via the control block inputs, the control block coordinates the collection of data pertaining to the response of each of the process outputs to each of the generated waveforms delivered to each of the process inputs. This data may, for example, be sent to a data historian to be stored. After sufficient data has been collected for each of the process input/output pairs, a process modeling procedure is run in which one or more process models are generated from the collected data using, for example, any known or desired model generation or determination routine. As part of this model generation or determination routine, a model parameter determination routine may develop the model parameters, e.g., matrix coefficients, dead time, gain, time constants, etc. needed by the control logic to be used to control the process. The model generation routine or the process model creation software may generate different types of models, including non-parametric models, such as finite impulse response (FIR) models, and parametric such as auto-regressive with external puts (ARX) models. The control logic parameters and, if needed, the process model, are then downloaded to the control block to complete formation of the advanced control block so that the advanced control block, with the model parameters and/or the process model therein, can be used to control the process during run-time. When desired, the model stored in the control block may be re-determined, changed, or updated.
In the example illustrated by
In the example particularly illustrated in
The control signal 225 generated by the DMC block 222 may be received by a gain block or gain adjustor 228 (e.g., a summer gain adjustor) that introduces gain to the control signal 225 prior to its delivery to the field device 122. In some cases, the gain may be amplificatory. In some cases, the gain may be fractional. The amount of gain introduced by the gain block 228 may be manually or automatically selected. In some embodiments, the gain block 228 may be omitted.
Steam generating boiler systems by their nature, however, generally respond somewhat slowly to control, in part due to the large volumes of water and steam that move through the system. To help shorten the response time, the control scheme 200 may include a derivative dynamic matrix control (DMC) block 230 in addition to the primary dynamic matrix control block 222. The derivative DMC block 230 may use a stored model (either parametric or a non-parametric) and a derivative dynamic matrix control routine to determine an amount of boost by which to amplify or modify the control signal 225 based on the rate of change or derivative of the disturbance variable received at an input of the derivative DMC block 230. In some cases, the control signal 225 may also be based on a desired weighting of the disturbance variable, and/or the rate of change thereof. For example, a particular disturbance variable may be more heavily weighted so as to have more influence on the controlled output (e.g., on the reference 202). Typically, the model stored in the derivative DMC block 230 (e.g., the derivative model) may be different than the model stored in the primary DMC block 222 (e.g., the primary model), as the DMC blocks 222 and 230 each receive a different set of inputs to generate different outputs. The derivative DMC block 230 may generate at its output a boost signal or a derivative signal 232 corresponding to the amount of boost.
A summer block 238 may receive the boost signal 232 generated by the derivative DMC block 230 (including any desired gain introduced by the optional gain block 235) and the control signal 225 generated by the primary DMC block 222. The summer block 238 may combine the control signal 225 and the boost signal 232 to generate a summer output control signal 240 to control a field device, such as the spray valve 122. For example, the summer block 238 may add the two input signals 225 and 232, or may amplify the control signal 225 by the boost signal 232 in some other manner. The summer output control signal 240 may be delivered to the field device to control the field device. In some embodiments, optional gain may be introduced to the summer output control signal 240 by the gain block 228, in a manner such as previously discussed for the gain block 228.
Upon reception of the summer output control signal 240, a field device such as the spray valve 122 may be controlled so that the response time of the boiler system 100 is shorter than a response time when the field device is controlled by the control signal 225 alone so as to move the portion of the boiler system that is desired to be controlled more quickly to the desired operating value or level. For example, if the rate of change of the disturbance variable is slower, the boiler system 100 can afford more time to respond to the change, and the derivative DMC block 230 would generate a boost signal corresponding to a lower boost to be combined with the control output of the primary DMC block 230. If the rate of change is faster, the boiler system 100 would have to respond more quickly and the derivative DMC block 230 would generate a boost signal corresponding to a larger boost to be combined with the control output of the primary DMC block 230.
In the example illustrated by
Although not illustrated, various embodiments of the control system or scheme 200 are possible. For example, the derivative DMC block 230, its corresponding gain block 235, and the summer block 238 may be optional. In particular, in some faster responding systems, the derivative DMC block 230, the gain block 235 and the summer block 238 may be omitted. In some embodiments, one or all of the gain blocks 220, 228 and 235 may be omitted. In some embodiments, a single change rate determiner 205 may receive one or more signals corresponding to multiple disturbance variables, and may deliver a single signal 210 corresponding to rate(s) of change to the primary DMC block 222. In some embodiments, multiple change rate determiners 205 may each receive one or more signals corresponding to different disturbance variables, and the primary DMC block 222 may receive multiple signals 210 from the multiple change rate determiners 205. In the embodiments including multiple change rite determiners 205, each of the multiple change rate determiners 205 may be in connection with a different corresponding derivative DMC block 230, and the multiple derivative DMC blocks 230 may each provide their respective boost signals 232 to the summer block 238. In some embodiments, the multiple change rate determiners 205 may each provide their respective boost outputs 210 to a single derivative DMC block 230. Of course, other embodiments of the control system 200 may be possible.
Furthermore, as the steam generating boiler system 100 generally includes multiple field devices, embodiments of the control system or scheme 200 may support the multiple field devices. For example, a different control system 200 may correspond to each of the multiple field devices, so that each different field device may be controlled by a different change rate determiner 205, a different primary DMC block 222, and a different (optional) derivative DMC block 230. That is, multiple instances of the control system 200 may be included in the boiler system 100, with each of the multiple instances corresponding to a different field device. In some embodiments of the boiler system 100, at least a portion of the control scheme 200 may service multiple field devices. For example, a single change rate determiner 205 may service multiple held devices, such as multiple spray valves. In an illustrative scenario, if more than one spray valve is desired to be controlled based on the rate of change of fuel to air ratio, a single change rate determiner 205 may generate a signal 210 corresponding to the rate of change of fuel to air ratio and may deliver the signal 210 to different primary DMC blocks 222 corresponding to the different spray valves. In another example, a single primary DMC block 222 may control all spray valves in a portion of or the entire boiler system 100. In other examples, a single derivative DMC block 230 may deliver a boost signal 232 to multiple primary DMC blocks 222, where each of the multiple primary DMC blocks 222 provides its generated control signal 225 to a different field device. Of course, other embodiments of the control system scheme 200 to control multiple field devices may be possible.
In some embodiments, the control system or scheme 200 and/or the controller unit 120 may be dynamically tuned. For example, the control system or scheme 200 and/or the controller unit 120 may be dynamically tuned by using an error detector unit or block 250. In particular, the error detector unit may detect the presence of an error or discrepancy between the desired value 203 of an output parameter and an actual value 202 of the output parameter. The error detector unit 250 may receive, at a first input, a signal corresponding to the output parameter 202 (in this example, the temperature of the output steam 202). At a second input, the error detector unit 250 may receive a signal corresponding to the setpoint 203 of the output parameter 202. The error detector unit 250 may determine a magnitude of a difference between the signals received at the first and the second inputs, and may provide an output signal 252 indicative of the magnitude of the difference to the primary dynamic matrix control block 222.
The DMC block 222 may receive a signal corresponding to the rate of change of the disturbance variable 210 at a third input. As previously discussed, the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the disturbance variable 210 may or may not be modified by the gain block 220. The DMC block 222 may adjust the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV 210 based on the output signal 252 generated by the error detection unit 250 (e.g., based on the magnitude of the difference between the setpoint 203 and the actual level of the output para mete 202). In some embodiments, if the output signal 252 of the error detector unit 250 indicates a larger magnitude of difference, this may indicate a larger error or discrepancy between an actual level of the output parameter 202 and a desired level 203 of the output parameter 202. Accordingly, the DMC block 222 may adjust or tune the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV 210 more aggressively to more quickly ameliorate the error or discrepancy, e.g., the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV 210 may be subject to a larger magnitude of adjustment. Similarly, if the output signal 252 of the error detector unit 250 indicates a smaller magnitude of difference or error, the DMC block 222 may adjust or tune the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV 210 less aggressively, e.g., the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV 210 may be subject to a smaller magnitude of adjustment. If the output signal 252 indicates that the magnitude of the difference between the actual level of the output parameter 202 and the desired level 203 of the output parameter 202 is essentially zero or otherwise within tolerance (as defined by an operator or by system parameters), then the control system or scheme 200 may be operating in a manner such as to keep the output parameter 202 within an acceptable range, and the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV 210 may not be adjusted.
In this manner, the dynamic matrix control block 222 may provide dynamic tuning of the control system or scheme 200. For example, the DMC block 222 may provide dynamic tuning of the rate of change of the DV 210 based on a magnitude of a difference or an error between a desired level 203 and an actual level of the output parameter 202. As the difference or error changes in magnitude, the magnitude of an adjustment of the rate of change of the DV 210 may be changed accordingly.
It should be noted that while
The error detector unit 250 may include an absolute value or magnitude block 250C that receives the output signal 250B of the difference block 250A and determines an absolute value or magnitude of the difference between the received input signals 202 and 203. In the embodiment illustrated in
The output signal 250D may be provided to a function block or unit 250E. The function block or unit 250E may include a routine, algorithm or computer-executable instructions for a function f(x) (reference 250F) that operates on the signal 250D (which is indicative of the magnitude of the difference between the actual 202 and desired 203 output parameter levels). The output signal 252 of the error detector block 250 may be based on the output of the function f(x) (reference 250F), and may be provided to the dynamic matrix control block 222. Thus, the signal 250D indicative of the magnitude of the difference between the actual 202 and desired 203 values of the output parameter may be modified based on f(x) (reference 250F), and the modified or adjusted signal 252 may be provided to the dynamic matrix control block 222 to dynamically tune the control system or scheme 200.
In some embodiments, the output signal 252 from the error detector 250 may be stored in a register R that is accessed by the DMC block 222 to generate the control signal 225. In particular, the DMC block 222 may compare the value in the register R to a value in a register Q to determine an aggressiveness of tuning reflected in the control signal 225 to control the control system 200. The value in the register of Q may be, for example, provided by another entity within the control scheme 200 or boiler system 100, may be manually provided, or may be configured. In one example, as the value of R moves away from the value of Q, the DMC may tune the control signal 225 more aggressively to control the process. As the value of R moves towards the value of Q, the DMC block 222 may adjust the control signal 225 accordingly for less aggressive control. In other embodiments, the converse may occur: as the value of R moves towards the value of Q, the DMC may generate a more aggressive signal 225, and as the value of R moves away from the value of Q, the DMC may generated a less aggressive signal 225. In some embodiments, the registers R and Q may be internal registers of the DMC block 222.
Of course, while
In some embodiments, at least some portion of the function f(x) (reference 250F) may be modifiable. That is, an operator may manually modify one or more portions of the function f(x), and/or one or more portions of the function f(x) may be automatically modified based on one or more parameters of the control scheme 200 or of the boiler 100. For example, one or more boundary conditions of f(x) may be changed or modified, a constant included in f(x) may be modified, a slope or curve of f(x) between a certain range of input values may be modified, etc.
Turning back to
Some embodiments of the dynamic matrix control scheme or control system 200 may include prevention of saturated steam from entering the superheater 106. As commonly known, if steam at saturation temperature is delivered to the final superheater 106, the saturated steam may enter the turbine 202 and consequently may cause potentially undesirable results, such as damage to the turbine. Accordingly,
The prevention block 282 may receive, at a first input, a control signal 225B from the primary DMC block 222. The DMC block 222 may include a routine that generates a control signal 225A that is similar to the routine of the DMC block 222 that generates the control signal 225 in
The prevention block 282 may receive, at a second input, a signal indicative of atmospheric pressure (AP) 288, and may receive, at a third input, a signal indicative of the current intermediate steam temperature 158. Based on the atmospheric pressure, the prevention block 282 may determine a saturated steam temperature. Based on the saturated steam temperature and the current intermediate steam temperature 158, the prevention block 282 may determine a magnitude of a temperature difference between the temperatures 158 and 288, and may determine an adjustment or modification to the control signal 225B corresponding to the magnitude of the temperature difference to aid in preventing the intermediate steam temperature 158 from reaching the saturated steam temperature. Upon applying the adjustment or modification to the control signal 225B, the prevention block 282 may provide, at an output, an adjusted or modified control signal 225C to control the intermediate steam temperature 158. In the example illustrated in
The fuzzifier block 282E may receive the signal 282D at a first input, and may receive the control signal 225B at a second input. Based on the signal 282D from the comparator 282C (e.g., based on a temperature difference between the saturated steam temperature 282B and the current value of the intermediate steam temperature 158), the fuzzifier block 282E may determine an adjustment or modification to the control signal 225B, and may generate the adjusted or modified signal 225C at an output.
In some embodiments, the adjustment or modification to the control signal 225B may be determined based on a comparison of the magnitude of the temperature difference to a threshold T, so that the fuzzifier 282E does not adjust or modify the signal 225B until the threshold T is crossed. In an example, the threshold T may be 15 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the examples and embodiments discussed herein may refer to the threshold T as being 15 degrees F. for clarity of discussion. It is understood, however, that other values or units of the threshold T may be possible. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the threshold T may be adjustable, either automatically or manually.
In embodiments including a threshold T, when the magnitude of the difference between the saturated steam temperature 282B and the actual intermediate steam temperature is less than T (e.g., less than 15 degrees F.), the fuzzifier block 282E may apply an adjustment to the control signal 225B to generate a modified control signal 225C. The applied adjustment may be based on the signal 282D, for instance. The modified control signal 225C may be provided to the spray valve 122 to control the spray valve 122 to move towards a closed position. The movement of the spray valve 122 towards a closed position may result in an increase of the intermediate steam temperature 158, and thus may decrease the possibility of steam at a saturation temperature from entering the superheater 106. When the magnitude of the difference between the saturated steam temperature 282B and the actual intermediate steam temperature 158 is greater than T, the intermediate steam temperature 158 may be at an acceptable distance from the saturated steam temperature 282B, and the fuzzifier 282E may simply pass the control signal 225B to the field device 122 without any adjustment (e.g., the adjusted control signal 225C is equivalent to the control signal 225B).
Of course, 15 degrees F. is only one example of a possible threshold value. The threshold may be set to other values. Indeed, the threshold value may be modifiable, either manually by an operator, automatically based on one or more values or parameters in the steam boiler generating system, or both manually and automatically.
In some embodiments, the determination of the adjustment to the control signal 225B by the fuzzifier block 282E may be based on an algorithm, routine or computer-executable instructions for a function g(x) (reference 282F) included in the fuzzifier block 282E. The function g(x) may or may not include the threshold T. For example, the adjustment routine g(x) (reference 282F) may generate an adjusted control signal 225C to control the rate of closing and opening of the spray valve 122 based on the direction (e.g., increasing or decreasing) of the temperature difference irrespective of the threshold T. In another example, the adjustment routine g(x) that may not adjust the control signal 225B when the magnitude of the temperature difference is greater than the threshold T, but may determine an adjustment to the control signal 225B corresponding to a rate of increase or decrease of the magnitude of the temperature difference when the temperature difference is less than the threshold T. Other examples of embodiments of g(x) (reference 282F) may be possible and used in the fuzzifier 282E.
In some embodiments, at least some portion of the algorithm or function g(x) (reference 282F) may itself be modified or adjusted, either manually or automatically, in a manner similar to possible modifications or adjustments to f(x) of
Using the curve 285, for given magnitude of temperature difference 288, a corresponding multiplier value 290 may be determined, and the determined multiplier value 290 may be applied to the input signal 282D received by the fuzzifier 282E. The modified input signal then may be used by the fuzzifier 282E to adjust or modify the control signal 225B to generate an adjusted or modified control signal 225C, and the adjusted control signal 225C may be output by the fuzzifier 282E.
In the embodiment of the curve 285 illustrated in
When the magnitude of the temperature difference is less than the threshold T (e.g., x<T), the intermediate steam temperature 285 may be moving undesirably close to the steam saturation temperature. In these scenarios, the control signal 225B may require more aggressive adjustment. As such, as the temperature difference nears the multiplier 290 may increase according to the curve 285. For example, when the intermediate steam temperature is essentially identical to the saturated steam temperature (e.g., x=0), a multiplier of one may be applied to the signal 282D so that in the signal 282D may fully affect the control signal 225B to generate the output control signal 225C. In another example, for a temperature difference of 7.5 degrees (e.g., x=7.5), the curve 285 may indicate that the multiplier to be applied to the input signal 282D is 0.5 or 50%, and thus the modified signal 282D may have half the effect on the control signal 225B as compared to when the temperature difference is essentially zero. In this manner, as more aggressive control is required by the control scheme 200, the function g(x) may more aggressively apply a multiplier of the signal 282D to adjust the input control signal 225B.
The curve 292 may define a position multiplier 290 for a current device position for each value of magnitudes of temperature differences between the saturated steam temperature and the current intermediate steam temperature 288. In this embodiment of the curve 292, when the difference between saturation and intermediate steam temperatures is at or above the threshold T (e.g., x>T), the system 200 may be operating at or above a desired range of temperature difference and thus may not need the spray valve 122 to increase or decrease its current spray volume in order to maintain the current operating conditions. Accordingly, the curve 292 indicates that for temperature differences above the threshold T, the valve position may not change from its current value (e.g., the device position multiplier is one).
However, when the intermediate steam temperature begins to move towards the saturation steam temperature (e.g., x<T), the intermediate steam temperature 158 may be desired to increase. To affect the desired increase in the intermediate steam temperature 158, the volume of cooling spray currently being provided by the valve 122 may be desired to decrease. Accordingly, as x moves towards zero, the curve 292 may indicate that the position multiplier 290 decreases to move the valve towards a closed position. For example, the curve 292 indicates that when the temperature difference is 7.5 degrees, the position multiplier 290 to be applied to the current valve position may be 0.5 or 50%, so the valve may be controlled by the output control signal 225C of the fuzzifier 282E to move towards half of its current position. When the intermediate steam temperature is essentially at the saturated steam temperature (e.g., x=0), the position multiplier 290 to be applied to the current valve position is essentially zero, so that the valve may be controlled by the output control signal 225C to move to zero percent of its current position (e.g., fully closed), thus controlling the intermediate steam temperature to rise as quickly as possible.
As described above, the superimposition of the curve 292 on the curve 285 corresponding to g(x) (reference 282F) illustrates one of many possible examples of how the input signal 282D to the fuzzifier 282E may be modified based on the intermediate steam temperature value 158, and how the resulting adjusted or modified control signal 225C output by the fuzzifier 282E may affect the positioning of a field device 122. Of course, the curves 285 and 292 are exemplary only. Other embodiments of curves 285 and 292 are possible and may be used in conjunction with the present disclosure.
At block 302, a signal 208 indicative of a disturbance variable used in the steam generating boiler system 100 may be obtained or received. The disturbance variable may be any control, manipulated or disturbance variable used in the boiler system 100, such as a furnace burner tilt position; a steam flow; an amount of soot blowing; a damper position; a power setting; a fuel to air mixture ratio of the furnace; a firing rate of the furnace; a spray flow; a water wall steam temperature; a load signal corresponding to one of a target load or an actual load of the turbine; a flow temperature; a fuel to feed water ratio; the temperature of the output steam; a quantity of fuel; or a type of fuel. In some embodiments, one or more signals 208 may correspond to one or more disturbance variables. At block 305, a rate of change of the disturbance variable may be determined. At block 308, a signal 210 indicative of the rate of change of the disturbance variable may be generated and provided to an input of a dynamic matrix controller, such as the primary DMC block 222. In some embodiments, the blocks 302, 305 and 308 may be performed by the change rate determiner 205.
At block 310, a control signal 225 corresponding to an optimal response may be generated based on the signal 210 indicative of the rate of change of the disturbance variable generated at the block 308. For example, the control signal 225 may be generated by the primary DMC block 222 based on the signal 210 indicative of the rate of change of the disturbance variable and a parametric model corresponding to the primary DMC block 222. At block 312, a temperature 202 of output steam generated by the steam generating boiler system 100 immediately prior to delivery to a turbine 116 or 118 may be controlled based on the control signal 225 generated by the block 310.
In some embodiments, the method 300 may include additional blocks 315-328. In these embodiments, at the block 315, the signal 210 corresponding to the rate of change of the disturbance variable determined by the block 305 may also be provided to a derivative dynamic matrix controller, such as the derivative DMC block 230 of
At the block 322, the boost or derivative signal 232 generated at the block 320 and the control signal 225 generated at the block 310 may be provided to a summer, such as the summer block 238 of
At a block 352, a signal indicative of an output parameter of a steam generating boiler system (such as the system 100) or of a level of the output parameter of the steam generating boiler system may be obtained or received. The output parameter may correspond to, for example, an amount of ammonia generated by the boiler system, a level of a drum in the steam boiler system, a pressure of a furnace in the boiler system, a pressure at a throttle of the boiler system, or some other quantified or measured output parameter of the boiler system. In one example, the output parameter may correspond to a temperature of output steam generated by the boiler system 100 and provided to a turbine, such as the temperature 202 of
At a block 355, a signal indicative of a setpoint corresponding to the output parameter may be obtained or received. For example, the setpoint may be a setpoint corresponding to the temperature of output steam generated by the boiler system and provided to a turbine, such as the setpoint 203 of
At a block 358, a difference or an error between the actual value of the output parameter (e.g., the reference 202) obtained at the block 352 and the desired value of the output parameter (e.g., the reference 203) obtained at the block 355 may be determined. For example, the difference between the actual 202 and desired 203 values of the output parameter may be determined by a difference block or unit 250A in the error detector block or unit 250. In another example, the DMC block 222 may determine the difference between the actual 202 and desired 203 values of the output parameter.
At a block 360, a magnitude or size of the difference/error determined at the block 358 may be determined. For example, the magnitude of the difference may be determined at the block 360 by taking the absolute value of the difference determined at the block 358. In some embodiments, at the block 360, the absolute value block 250C of
At an optional block 362, the magnitude of the difference between the actual 202 and desired 203 values of the output parameter may be modified or adjusted. For example, a signal indicative of the magnitude of the difference between the actual 202 and desired 203 values of the output parameter (e.g., the output generated by the block 360) may be modified or adjusted by a function f(x) such as illustrated by reference 250F in
In some embodiments, the block 362 may be performed by the error detector block 250, such as by the function block 250E of the error detector block 250. In some embodiments, the block 362 may be performed by the dynamic matrix control block 222. In some embodiments, the block 362 may be omitted altogether, such as when f(x) is not desired or required. In these embodiments, the block 365 may directly follow the block 360 in the method 350.
At the block 365, the signal indicative of the modified or adjusted magnitude of difference or error between the actual 202 and desired 203 values of the output parameter may be used to modify or adjust the signal corresponding to the rate of change of a disturbance variable, such as signal 210 of
At a block 367, the modified or adjusted signal generated at the block 365 may be provided to the DMC block 222. If the signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV 210 is not modified or adjusted at the block 365, then a control signal equivalent to the original signal 210 (including any desired gain 220) may be provided to the DMC block 222.
In some embodiments, the block 365 may be performed by the DMC block 222. In these embodiments, the signal corresponding to the output of f(x) may be received by the DMC block 322 at a first input (e.g., reference 252 of
In some embodiments, instead of the block 365 being performed by the dynamic matrix control block 222, the block 365 may be performed by another block (not pictured) in connection with the DMC block 222. In these embodiments, the rate of change of a disturbance variable (e.g., reference 210 or 220 of
In some embodiments, the method 350 of
At a block 310, a control signal may be generated based on a signal indicative of a rate of change of a disturbance variable used in the steam generating boiler system. The control signal may be generated by a dynamic matrix controller. For example, as shown in
At a block 405, a saturated steam temperature may be obtained. The saturated steam temperature may be obtained, in an example, by obtaining a current atmospheric pressure and determining the saturated steam temperature based on the atmospheric pressure from a steam table or calculator. For example, as shown in
At a block 408, a temperature of intermediate steam may be obtained. The temperature of intermediate steam may be obtained, for example, at a location in the boiler 100 where intermediate steam is being provided to a superheater or a final superheater. In one example, a signal indicative of a current intermediate steam temperature 158 in
At a block 410, the saturated steam temperature and the current intermediate steam temperature may be compared to determine a temperature difference. In some embodiments, a magnitude of temperature difference may be determined. In some embodiments, a direction (e.g., increasing or decreasing) of temperature difference may be determined. For example, as illustrated in
At a block 412, an adjustment or modification to the control signal generated at the block 310 may be determined based on the temperature difference determined at the block 410. For example, a fuzzifier block or unit such as the fuzzifier 282E of
At a block 415, an adjusted or modified control signal corresponding to the rate of change of the DV may be generated. For example, the fuzzifier 282E may generate an adjusted or modified control signal 225C based on the adjustment or modification determined at the block 412.
At a block 418, the intermediate steam temperature may be controlled based on the adjusted or modified control signal. In the embodiment of
In some embodiments, the method 400 of
Still further, the control schemes, systems and methods described herein are each applicable to steam generating systems that use other types of configurations for superheater and reheater sections than illustrated or described herein. Thus, while
Moreover, the control schemes, systems and methods described herein are not limited to controlling only an output steam temperature of a steam generating boiler system. Other dependent process variables of the steam generating boiler system may additionally or alternatively be controlled by any of the control schemes, systems and methods described herein. For example, the control schemes, systems and methods described herein are each applicable to controlling an amount of ammonia for nitrogen oxide reduction, drum levels, furnace pressure, throttle pressure, and other dependent process variables of the steam generating boiler system.
Although the forgoing text sets forth a detailed description of numerous different embodiments of the invention, it should be understood that the scope of the invention is defined by the words of the claims set forth at the end of this patent. The detailed description is to be construed as exemplary only and does not describe every possible embodiment of the invention because describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims defining the invention.
Thus, many modifications and variations may be made in the techniques and structures described and illustrated herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that the methods and apparatus described herein are illustrative only and are not limiting upon the scope of the invention.
This application is a Continuation-in-Part of pending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/856,998, filed Aug. 16, 2010 and entitled “Steam Temperature Control Using Dynamic Matrix Control,” the contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2003419 | Artsay | Jun 1935 | A |
2911789 | Baker | Nov 1959 | A |
3016711 | Shakeshaft | Jan 1962 | A |
3244898 | Hickox | Apr 1966 | A |
3550562 | Strohmeyer, Jr. | Dec 1970 | A |
3588265 | Berry | Jun 1971 | A |
3837167 | Durrant et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3873817 | Liang | Mar 1975 | A |
3875384 | Davis | Apr 1975 | A |
3878401 | Ronnen | Apr 1975 | A |
3879616 | Baker et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3898441 | Davis et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3911286 | Uram | Oct 1975 | A |
3930367 | Gasparoli | Jan 1976 | A |
3934128 | Uram | Jan 1976 | A |
3937934 | Pasemann | Feb 1976 | A |
3939328 | Davis | Feb 1976 | A |
3948043 | Martz | Apr 1976 | A |
3955358 | Martz et al. | May 1976 | A |
3959635 | Tanco | May 1976 | A |
3973391 | Reed et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4013877 | Uram et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4025765 | Giras et al. | May 1977 | A |
4027145 | McDonald et al. | May 1977 | A |
4028884 | Martz et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4029255 | Heiser et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4029952 | Giras et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4031372 | Davis | Jun 1977 | A |
4035624 | Lardi | Jul 1977 | A |
4037088 | Davis et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4047005 | Heiser et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4053746 | Braytenbah et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4053747 | Davis | Oct 1977 | A |
4057715 | Jones et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4061533 | Durrant | Dec 1977 | A |
4064699 | Martz | Dec 1977 | A |
4086773 | Kanegae et al. | May 1978 | A |
4090065 | Braytenbah et al. | May 1978 | A |
4168608 | Uram | Sep 1979 | A |
4184324 | Kiscaden et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4195231 | Reed et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4201924 | Uram | May 1980 | A |
4205380 | Braytenbah | May 1980 | A |
4220869 | Uram | Sep 1980 | A |
4222229 | Uram | Sep 1980 | A |
4227093 | Uram et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4236220 | Kogami et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4245162 | Ronnen et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4246491 | Waldron et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4258424 | Giras et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4267458 | Uram et al. | May 1981 | A |
4270055 | Ronnen et al. | May 1981 | A |
4333310 | Uram | Jun 1982 | A |
4353204 | Arakawa | Oct 1982 | A |
4425762 | Wakamatsu et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4427896 | Waldron | Jan 1984 | A |
4445180 | Davis et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4471620 | Binstock et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4578944 | Martens et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4589255 | Martens et al. | May 1986 | A |
4619224 | Takita et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4637348 | Fukayama | Jan 1987 | A |
4644479 | Kemper et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4687946 | Jones | Aug 1987 | A |
4888953 | Fukayama et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4975238 | Regan et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5091844 | Waltz | Feb 1992 | A |
5237816 | Duffy et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5268835 | Miyagaki et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5305230 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5413175 | Edmunds | May 1995 | A |
5433079 | Badami et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5453925 | Wojsznis et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5485754 | Harpster | Jan 1996 | A |
5517424 | Marcelle et al. | May 1996 | A |
5533383 | Greene et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547337 | Fork et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5568378 | Wojsznis | Oct 1996 | A |
5594858 | Blevins | Jan 1997 | A |
5646513 | Riggio, Jr. | Jul 1997 | A |
5752411 | Harpster | May 1998 | A |
5841652 | Sanchez | Nov 1998 | A |
5914537 | Zaviska et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5943865 | Cohen | Aug 1999 | A |
6109019 | Sugishita | Aug 2000 | A |
6223520 | Kita | May 2001 | B1 |
6445962 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6445963 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453308 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459939 | Hugo | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501998 | Pfeiffer | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510351 | Blevins et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6577908 | Wojsznis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6609361 | Vugdelija | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6681155 | Fujita et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6701274 | Eryurek et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721609 | Wojsznis et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6847954 | Wojsznis et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6901300 | Blevins et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6970750 | Wojsznis et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7043311 | Nixon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7110835 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113834 | Wojsznis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117052 | Lucas et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7242989 | Blevins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7272454 | Wojsznis et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7317953 | Wojsznis et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337022 | Wojsznis et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346472 | Moskowitz et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7376472 | Wojsznis et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7421354 | Brunell | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7451004 | Thiele et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7496041 | Blevins et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7526347 | Lucas et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7551969 | Wojsznis et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587252 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596198 | Srinivasan | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7620460 | Blevins et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647126 | Blevins et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7702409 | Lucas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7729789 | Blevins et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7729792 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7738975 | Denison et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7826908 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840287 | Wojsznis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7856281 | Thiele et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7877154 | Blevins et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7922155 | Havlena | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930045 | Cheng | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7945339 | Blevins et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7971052 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8046096 | Denison et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8055358 | Blevins et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060834 | Lucas et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8127241 | Blevins et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135481 | Blevins et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8185217 | Thiele | May 2012 | B2 |
8200346 | Thiele | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8280533 | Wojsznis et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8326666 | Caldwell et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8433450 | Francino et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8473087 | Lucas et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8509926 | Blevins et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8788450 | Ulyanov | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20010021900 | Kassmann | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020071975 | Shimazu | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120352 | Stothert et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030004681 | Fandrich et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028265 | Martin | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046939 | Hyakutake et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030120359 | O'Leary et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030158709 | Ishida et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040050072 | Palfy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050076 | Palfy et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040244729 | Lefebvre et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096872 | Blevins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136303 | Kobayshi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060052902 | Lefebvre et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074599 | Emigholz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060191896 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224534 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060283406 | Francino et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070042768 | Gazeley | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055392 | D'Amato et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129917 | Blevins et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151243 | Stewart | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174225 | Blevins et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198104 | Sayyarrodsari et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208549 | Blevins et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080016647 | Francino et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029261 | Kephart et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077257 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082180 | Blevins et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080125881 | Grott et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141953 | Hirayama et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148713 | White et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080244975 | Johnston | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288198 | Francino et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080302102 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012653 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016609 | Zakrzewski et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040367 | Zakrzewski et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056036 | Herkle et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063113 | Francino et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089247 | Blevins et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118873 | Cheng et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100062381 | Gross et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077970 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100087933 | Cheng | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100162700 | Birnbaum et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100236241 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241249 | Jia et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100318934 | Blevins et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110023487 | Olia | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040390 | Blevins et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066298 | Francino et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110131017 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110131455 | Law et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110218782 | Coughran et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224808 | Lucas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230980 | Hammack et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110245937 | Rawson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110288660 | Wojsznis et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288786 | Blevins et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288837 | Blevins et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120010757 | Francino et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010758 | Francino et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120030852 | Anscher | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036852 | Beveridge et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040298 | Beveridge et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040299 | Beveridge et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120290104 | Holt et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130085795 | Caldwell et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110298 | Beveridge | May 2013 | A1 |
20150114320 | Beveridge | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 486 570 | Sep 1977 | GB |
2 454 357 | May 2009 | GB |
2 482 954 | Feb 2012 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Moon et al., Step-response model development for dynamic matrix control of a drum-type boiler-turbine system, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 24, 423-430(2009). |
Search Report for Application No. GB1219482.5, dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
Qin, S. Joe and Thomas A. Badgwell, “An Overview of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology,” AlChE Conference, 1996. |
Search Report for Application No. GB1112940.0, dated Nov. 9, 2011. |
Search Report for Application No. GB1113709.8, dated Nov. 16, 2011. |
Search Report for Application No. GB1113708.0, dated Nov. 16, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120040299 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12856998 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13022324 | US |