The invention relates generally to an exoskeleton, which is an external augmentative device worn by a person to enhance their motor functions. This augmentation can come from applying a force which is complementary to the user's intended motion. The applied force can be used to increase the user's natural strength by means of adding an additional force in series to the natural movement. The applied force can also be used to increase endurance through minimizing the user's effort to complete a task. As the exoskeleton applies a portion of the required force to complete a task, the metabolic cost to the user is reduced, increasing their endurance at said task. Exoskeletons can also increase mobility by increasing the strength and/or frequency of the user's motion. When coupled with the added endurance, an assistive exoskeleton's enhanced strength allows a user to complete a motion for longer periods of time at strengths beyond the capabilities they would have without augmentation. For example, by applying assistive force to the normal gait cycle, the frequency of the gait and distance covered during the initial swing phase of the gait can be increased. This augmentation of a fundamental human movement can result in a greater distance traveled over time, at a lower relative metabolic cost to the user.
Exoskeletons can be considered passive or active depending how they apply their force, and their reliance on energy storage. Passive exoskeletons do not require an energy source, such as a battery. Active devices require an energy source to power electronics and usually include force/power applying actuators. The exoskeleton functions by applying its active or passive augmentation through parallel structures to the user's skeletal system. If the exoskeleton does not act in parallel with the user's innate motility systems, it will lose efficiency, and possibly even resist the user's force.
It is also ideal for the parallel structures to be designed in such a way that does not inhibit the user's natural range of motion. Any impingement of the user's natural abilities offsets the potential benefits of augmentation, and additionally correlates to lower user comfort. Reducing the user's range of motion also impedes their ability to perform normal tasks, limiting the use cases for the exoskeleton. Having rigid limits or mis-alignment contrary to the user's range of motion creates shear between the person and the mechanical structure. Any user attempts to extend beyond the limited range of motion imposed by the exoskeleton will result in mechanical interference between the exoskeleton mounting bodies and the user's skin, greatly decreasing user comfort and resulting performance.
In order to enhance the user's intended motion, the exoskeleton must move complimentary to the user's musculoskeletal system. Any unintended deviations from the user's natural movements can result in counterapplication of augmentation, and an additional loss of effectiveness. To this end, it is desirable for the system to be rigidly affixed to the user's musculoskeletal system in order to maximize the transmission of force to the ground, while not being so rigid as to restrict their usual range of motion.
Effective exoskeleton design is highly reliant on proper alignment of human and exoskeleton joints. Misalignment of internal human joints and external robotic joints results in shearing between the mating surface between the human and exoskeleton. Any amount of surface shear in the mating interface will likely create user discomfort as the shear leads to inadequate pressure dispersion. This shear can also put an uneven load on the exoskeleton system, creating inefficiencies in the transmission of force to the user. Additionally, the shearing can lead to increased movement of the exoskeleton with respect to the body of the user. In all cases, misalignments between the line of actions of the human and exoskeleton will decrease efficiency and increase user discomfort.
By using a single degree of freedom (DOF) joint, alignment can be accomplished with rigid fixturing of the human to the exoskeleton. Rigid fixturing initially creates the alignment required between the human and robotic joints to avoid shear. A rigid assembly, however, creates additional static misalignments though the difficulty in accepting users of differing size. While assumptions can be made to fit the majority of users, this limits the ability of the exoskeleton to be perfectly aligned with all users. The general deviation in length of the lower leg bones can be significant enough to create mechanical device mis-alignment across a population of users. In an attempt to minimize this affect, each time the user dons the exoskeleton, they may adjust the system to the optimal position to avoid an inefficient and uncomfortable session.
An additional downside of rigid alignment techniques are difficulties with dynamic misalignments that occur naturally during motion. As the user moves, their soft tissue deflects while the solid structure around them does not. This difference in positioning creates dynamic misalignments that decrease exoskeleton efficiency and increase user discomfort.
A solution to this problem is to design an exoskeleton fixturing device that has additional degrees of freedom that maintain stiffness in the direction of actuation, yet allows for flexibility in other directions. If rigidity in the direction of action is not maintained, the exoskeleton will not transmit force to the user efficiently. If the intended range of device motion is too rigid, it will inhibit natural user motion. An added refinement of this design is accommodating and emulating the multiple degrees of freedom experienced during natural movement with a device rigidly affixed to the body. While the human system has multiple compact joints with multiple degree of freedom, creating a mechanical analog increases mechanical complexity and device footprint.
It is ideal to have an exoskeleton mounting solution that minimizes weight, since added weight decreases the effectiveness of the augmentation. It is also ideal to accommodate dynamic changes in joint alignment, while ensuring the user can easily adjust the device to personalize fit. An additional favorable design consideration would be to have a system that is able to align itself properly, even when the user dons it incorrectly.
It is ideal for the system to accommodate the multiple degrees of freedom that human joints accomplish. Any decrease in user range of motion reduces device efficacy and user satisfaction. Therefore, it is favorable to undertake the complexities involved in multiple joints and multiple degrees of freedom, even though adding mechanical degrees of freedom inherently adds failure points to the design and potentially reduces the overall robustness of the device. Additionally, any decrease in system robustness decreases reliability and decreases the use cases for the exoskeleton.
The present invention provides new advantages not found in currently available exoskeleton devices. The current invention additionally overcomes many disadvantages of currently available exoskeletons employing rigid structures close to the body.
In one exemplary embodiment, the invention is generally directed to the novel and unique exoskeleton mounting designs that address the problems associated with user comfort, restricting user range of motion, and user compatibility. The present mechanical system can allow an exoskeleton device to attach to a user and dynamically align to the user's natural joint axis. Such a device can work on single or multi DOF joints and provides for fixation adjustments by the user.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a new and novel exoskeleton mounting device that is adjustable and does not inhibit the user's expected range of motion. The current invention is intended to address the problems associated with the prior art of exoskeleton devices.
The novel features which are characteristic of the present invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, the invention's preferred embodiments, together with further objects and attendant advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Certain exemplary embodiments will now be described to provide an overall understanding of the principles of the structure, function, manufacture, and use of the device and methods disclosed herein. One or more examples of these embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Those skilled in the art will understand that the devices and methods specifically described herein and illustrated in the accompanying drawings are non-limiting exemplary embodiments and that the scope of the present invention is defined solely by the claims. The features illustrated or described in connection with one exemplary embodiment may be combined with the features of other embodiments. Such modifications and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. Further, in the present disclosure, like-numbered components of the embodiments generally have similar features, and thus within a particular embodiment each feature of each like-numbered component is not necessarily fully elaborated upon. Additionally, to the extent that linear or circular dimensions are used in the description of the disclosed systems, devices, and methods, such dimensions are not intended to limit the types of shapes that can be used in conjunction with such systems, devices, and methods. A person skilled in the art will recognize that an equivalent to such linear and circular dimensions can easily be determined for any geometric shape. Further, to the extent that directional terms like proximal, distal, top, bottom, up, or down are used, they are not intended to limit the systems, devices, and methods disclosed herein. A person skilled in the art will recognize that these terms are merely relative to the system and device being discussed and are not universal. Further, for ease of discussion, the present invention is discussed in connection with a lower limb exoskeleton but the invention is also related and applicable to any exoskeleton.
In general, an embodiment of a novel exoskeleton is shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made to the illustrated embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure. All such modifications and changes are intended to be covered by the appended claims.
This application claims benefit of earlier filed U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/648,576, filed on Mar. 27, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under W911QY-16-C-0072 from the United States Army.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5363025 | Colling | Nov 1994 | A |
8235924 | Bachmann et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8394038 | Ashihara et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8516918 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8702811 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8731716 | Jacobsen et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8771370 | Albrecht-Laatsch et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8852292 | Ragnarsdottir et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8894592 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9445931 | Imaida et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9808073 | Maxwell | Nov 2017 | B1 |
20060211966 | Hatton et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20090222105 | Clausen | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100076360 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100130893 | Sankai | May 2010 | A1 |
20100256538 | Ikeuchi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120259259 | Chugunov | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283845 | Herr et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130012852 | Imaida et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130102934 | Ikeuchi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20140100493 | Craig | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140330431 | Hollander et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150173993 | Walsh et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209214 | Herr et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150351991 | Amundson | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150351995 | Zoss | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374573 | Horst et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160331557 | Tong et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160331625 | Sankai | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20180200135 | Tung | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180256433 | Pucci | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190070061 | Choi | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2011092507 | May 2011 | JP |
2010091377 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2016164395 | Oct 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mooney and Herr; Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2016) 13:4; “Biomechanical walking mechanisms underlying the metabolic reduction caused by an autonomous exoskeleton”, pp. 1-12; Published Jan. 28, 2016. |
Mooney et al., Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:151; “Autonomous exoskeleton reduces metabolic cost of human walking”; Published Nov. 3, 2014. |
Twist. Merriam Webster Online Dictionary, definition 1C, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/twist; Dec. 20, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190298599 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62648576 | Mar 2018 | US |