Examples described herein relate to hearing devices, and include particularly hearing devices that are positioned in the ear canal for inconspicuous wear. This application is related to pending patent application Ser. No. 12/878,926, titled CANAL HEARING DEVICE WITH DISPOSABLE BATTERY MODULE, and Ser. No. 13/424,242, titled BATTERY MODULE FOR PERPENDICULAR DOCKING INTO A CANAL HEARING DEVICE, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for any purpose.
The ear canal 10 (
Placement of a hearing device inside the ear canal 10 (
The present disclosure describes examples of dynamic pressure vents, seal assemblies and methods for safe acoustic sealing of canal hearing devices. A dynamic pressure vent for a canal hearing device according to some examples herein may include a flexible membrane having a thickness of 0.3 mm or less, and one or more flaps defined by one or more slits within the flexible membrane, wherein the one or more flaps are configured to temporarily deform and open in response to a pressure gradient across the flexible membrane while inside the ear canal. Diaphragmatic pressure valves incorporated within a flexible seal assembly of a canal hearing device are described, which may include three or more flexible flaps that are configured to be closed for acoustical sealing inside an ear canal during placement of the canal hearing device inside the ear canal, and wherein the flexible flaps are configured to temporarily deform and open upon pressure changes across the flaps.
A seal assembly for a canal hearing device according examples of the present disclosure may include a compliant sealing element and a membrane section in said compliant sealing element, the membrane section including one or more flaps formed therein, wherein at least one of the one or more flaps are configured to deform from a first position to a second position in response to a pressure gradient across the seal assembly while inside the ear canal. Canal hearing device assemblies according to this disclosure may include a canal hearing device and a seal assembly. The canal hearing device may include a microphone, a receiver, and a power source enclosed within a housing of the canal hearing device. The seal assembly may be removably attached to the canal hearing device and may include a compliant sealing element and a pressure vent configured to open responsive to a pressure gradient between a first side of the seal assembly and a second side of the seal assembly.
The above and still further objectives, features, aspects and attendant advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of certain preferred and alternate embodiments and method of manufacture and use thereof constituting the best mode presently contemplated of practicing the invention, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Certain details are set forth below to provide a sufficient understanding of embodiments of the invention. However, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that some embodiments may not include all details described. In some instances, well-known structures, hearing aid components, circuits, and controls, have not been shown in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the described embodiments of the invention.
Placement of an unvented hearing device inside the ear canal 10 may give rise to pressure buildup and moisture accumulation that may result in discomfort, infections, and/or trauma to the ear canal and the tympanic membrane (eardrum) 15. Venting may be used to allow air flow across the hearing device to provide acoustic occlusion relief, moisture release, and pressure equalization during insertion or removal of the canal device from the ear canal 10. Large venting is desirable on one hand to maximize these benefits (occlusion relief, moisture release, pressure release, etc.), but can also have adverse effects such as sound leakages and feedback. Venting in conventional hearing aid device is typically achieved by providing tubing 21 within the canal hearing device 20, or slits or grooves (not shown) across the housing of the canal hearing device 20.
Sealing may be used to prevent feedback, which may be caused by the leaking of a portion of amplified sound 25 from the receiver (speaker) port 26 into the microphone port 27, causing sustained oscillation. Sealing and venting are paradoxical. To minimize feedback, smaller vents are preferred. However, small vents do not allow sufficient air flow, particularly during rapid pressure changes in the ear canal such as during swift insertion or removal of the device from the ear canal, potentially causing pain and trauma to the tympanic membrane.
The present disclosure describes examples of methods and devices for acoustic sealing of canal hearing devices, for example as shown in
An example of a seal assembly 30 according to the present disclosure is depicted in
The membrane flaps (e.g. flaps 36, 37, and 38) are configured to open in response to an air pressure gradient (P2-P1) across the canal hearing device 40, for example a pressure gradient created when the canal hearing device is being placed inside the ear canal 10. In some examples, as shown in
In one embodiment, the seal assembly 30 incorporating the diaphragm with pressure vent 35 may be positioned concentrically over the lateral end 42 of the canal hearing device 40 and may be configured to engage with it in a space efficient manner. The seal assembly 30 may provide acoustic attenuation across the canal hearing device, particularly within the audiometric frequency range between 1,000 to 4,000 Hz. The sealing element 31, as described herein, is made from a compliant material in order to fit a variety of ear canal sizes and shapes. In some examples, the sealing element 31 may be made of a biocompatible elastomeric material such as SILICONE, neoprene, or polyurethane foam.
In the preferred embodiments, the pressure vent 35 may be formed from the same material as used for the sealing element 31. In this regard, membrane section 50 may be made of an elastomeric material such as SILICONE, neoprene, polyurethane foam or the like. The diaphragm 50 and pressure vent 53 may be adapted to provide dynamic pressure venting in response to pressure changes inside the ear canal. Conventional pressure vents typically provide a conduit like the tubing 21 in
In some embodiments, the pressure vent 35 incorporates flaps (e.g. membrane flaps 36, 37, and 38 as shown in
The flaps are generally configured to readily deform under certain pressure. For example, the flaps have a thickness and form factor selected to open in response to an air pressure gradient across the membrane section 50 (
The dynamic venting mechanism according to example of the present invention may provide for safe operation of the hearing device while allowing greater levels of sealing and sound amplification due to the normally closed vent design. Canal hearing devices are particularly prone to feedback due to the miniaturization and proximity of the components, particularly between the speaker and the microphone. The seal assembly 30 with sealing element 31 made from flexible material such as SILICONE provides a conforming sealing when the dynamic pressure vent 35 is normally closed. The dynamic pressure vent may be designed for complete or nearly complete closure, in which slight and acoustically insignificant slits (across the audiometric frequency of interest) remain between the flaps, as shown in
One or more fixed vents may be used in conjunction with the dynamic pressure vents as described herein. For example, a fixed vent 39 (
In some embodiments, the dynamic pressure vent 35 is formed in a membrane segment 50 (e.g., diaphragm 50) within the non-contacting region of the seal element 31. The membrane segment 50 may be a thinned region of the seal element 31. The membrane segment 50 may have a thickness in the range of 0.15 mm to 0.3 mm. The sealing element at the contact region 32 is generally thicker, for example having a thickness in the range of about 0.5 mm to about 1 mm. The flaps 36, 37, & 38 are designed to remain in a closed position at equilibrium and low pressures generally under 0.5 PSI and provide air flow less than 15 sccm. The flaps 36, 37, & 38 are designed to deform and/or open in response to an atmospheric pressure gradient, for example a pressure gradient over 0.5 PSI. In some examples, the flaps may open responsive to a pressure gradient generally under 5 PSI which is considered a safe limit for the eardrum 15. The flaps 36, 37, and 38 may open substantially fully responsive to a pressure gradient in the range of 0.75 PSI to about 1.5 PSI to allow an air flow exceeding 200 sccm. The membrane segment 50 is preferably of the same material as the sealing element 31 to minimize real estate, parts, cost, and complexity of the design.
In an example embodiment as shown in
In an example embodiment, shown in
Although examples of the invention have been described herein, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains from a consideration of the foregoing description of presently preferred and alternate embodiments and methods of fabrication and use thereof, and that variations and modifications of this exemplary embodiment and method may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the above-described embodiments of the invention should not be viewed as exhaustive or as limiting the invention to the precise configurations or techniques disclosed. Rather, it is intended that the invention shall be limited only by the appended claims and the rules and principles of applicable law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5327500 | Campbell | Jul 1994 | A |
5553152 | Newton | Sep 1996 | A |
5645074 | Shennib et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659621 | Newton | Aug 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5785661 | Shennib et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6000492 | Puthuff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6137889 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6212283 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6359993 | Brimhall | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6367578 | Shoemaker | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382346 | Brimhall et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6473513 | Shennib et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6546108 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6724902 | Shennib et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6937735 | DeRoo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940988 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7016511 | Shennib | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7113611 | Leedom et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7215789 | Shennib et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7260232 | Shennib | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7298857 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310426 | Shennib et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321663 | Olsen | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7403629 | Aceti et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7424123 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424124 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7580537 | Urso et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7664282 | Urso et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8155361 | Schindler | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8184842 | Howard et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8467556 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8571247 | Oezer | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8798301 | Shennib | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20010008560 | Stonikas et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020027996 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020085728 | Shennib et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20050249370 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259840 | Gable et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283263 | Eaton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060291683 | Urso et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070071265 | Leedom et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20100040250 | Gebert | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100119094 | Sjursen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100239112 | Howard et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110058697 | Shennib et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110188689 | Beck et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110206225 | Møller et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120285470 | Sather et al. | Nov 2012 | A9 |
20130010406 | Stanley | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130223666 | Michel et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130243229 | Shennib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130294631 | Shennib et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140150234 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140153762 | Shennib et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9907182 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 3, 2010 for PCT Appl. No. US2010/048299. |
“Lyric User Guide”, http://www.phonak.com/content/dam/phonak/b2b/C—M—tools/Hearing—Instruments/Lyric/documents/02-gb/Userguide—Lyric—V8—GB—FINAL—WEB.pdf, Jul. 2010. |
“User Manual—2011”, AMP Personal Audio Amplifiers, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140153761 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |