This invention relates to techniques for dynamically filtering and consolidating events from identification service providers and, more particularly, to methods and systems for provisioning services to process identification data received from a device.
Distributed systems today enable a device connected to a communications network to take advantage of services available on other devices located throughout the network. Each device in a distributed system may have its own internal data types, its own address alignment rules, and its own operating system. To enable such heterogeneous devices to communicate and interact successfully, developers of distributed systems can employ a remote procedure call (RPC) communication mechanism.
RPC mechanisms provide communication between processes (e.g., programs, applets, etc.) running on the same machine or different machines. In a simple case, one process, i.e., a client, sends a message to another process, i.e., a server. The server processes the message and, in some cases, returns a response to the client. In many systems, the client and server do not have to be synchronized. That is, the client may transmit the message and then begin a new activity, or the server may buffer the incoming message until the server is ready to process the message.
The Java™ programming language is an object-oriented programming language frequently used to implement such a distributed system. A program written in the Java programming language is compiled into a platform-independent format, using a bytecode instruction set, which can be executed on any platform supporting the Java virtual machine (JVM). The JVM may be implemented on any type of platform, greatly increasing the ease with which heterogeneous machines can be federated into a distributed system.
The Jini™ architecture has been developed using the Java programming language to enable devices in a distributed system to share services using remote method invocation (RMI). Traditional Jini systems use RMI to enable a client device to request and receive a service provided by a server device on a remote machine. While conventional Jini systems provide a basic architecture for providing services in a distributed system, they do not provide tools specifically directed to providing complex services. Current systems do not address provisioning a service, such as application software, to make it available to the distributed system in the first place. Furthermore, conventional systems do not consider the requirements of a specific service before provisioning the service to make it available in the distributed system.
For example, one such distributed system may include reader devices using Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology, and services that receive and process identification data from the reader devices and synthesize the processed data into meaningful business data. Although RFID technology is well known, conventional RFID systems do not operate satisfactorily in a distributed system, where network changes, such as the failure of a computer resource or the introduction of a new resource, are common. Furthermore, conventional RFID systems do not discover reader devices dynamically. It is therefore desirable to provide RFID systems that operate in a distributed, robust, reliable, scalable manner.
Methods and systems consistent with the present invention provide identification services over a distributed network. Systems and methods provide the tools to receive data from reader devices, process the received data, and provide the processed data to users. Enhanced event handling and dynamic service provisioning enable robust and flexible deployment of identification services in a distributed network.
According to an aspect of the invention, a method provides an identification service in a distributed system, comprising providing a set of one or more service elements, each service element including an adapter, a filter, and a logger and receiving, by a filter, criteria in accordance with predetermined instructions and receiving, by an adapter, identification data from a reader. The identification data is provided by the adapter to a filter and the filter processes the identification data based on the criteria. The processed data is provided by the filter to a logger, and the logger provides notification of the processed data. The service elements are monitored to determine whether any service element fails.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method provides an identification service in a distributed system by dynamically creating an application corresponding to each of a plurality of service elements, each service element including an adapter, a filter, and a logger. The filter application receives criteria specified by a user and the adapter application receives identification information corresponding to an item from a reader and provides the identification information to the filter application. The filter application processes the identification information application based on the criteria to create processed information including at least an identification code for the item and provides the processed information to the logger application. The logger application provides the processed information to a recipient. The application corresponding to each service element is monitored to determine whether any application fails.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a system provides a distributed identification service comprising a reader service having service elements comprising an adapter that receives identification information from one or more reader based on predetermined criteria, a filter that processes the identification information based on the criteria, and a logger that provides notification of the processed information. The system further comprises a registry service that establishes the reader service and its service elements and a monitor service that determines whether the application service or any of the service elements fails.
Additional features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate several embodiments of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
The following description of embodiments of this invention refers to the accompanying drawings. Where appropriate, the same reference numbers in different drawings refer to the same or similar elements.
Introduction
Systems consistent with the present invention provide identification services over a distributed network through a collection of service components that interface with identification devices and process data received from the devices. For example, items may be uniquely identified by an electronic product code (EPC) encoded in RFID tags. A reader device may detect the presence of an RFID tag and scan the EPC and any other information contained in the RFID tag. The data may then be used by applications such as an inventory system or a retail system to track and manage the items. One such identification network is described in the Auto-ID Savant Specification 1.0, available at www.autoidcenter.org.
An identification service consistent with an embodiment of the present invention provides a distributed middleware component between reader devices and users of identification data such as applications, databases, etc. By its nature, an identification service using RFID technology is typically widely distributed. Readers may be separated by a great distance from the users of identification data. For example, an international retailer may need to track inventory in stores around the world using computer systems located in a central headquarters. In another example, a shipping company may use RFID readers throughout a series of processing facilities and transportation hubs to track shipments.
One embodiment of the present invention can be implemented using the Rio™ architecture developed by Sun Microsystems and described in greater detail below. Rio uses tools provided by the Jini™ architecture, such as discovery and event handling, to provision and monitor complex services, such as identification services, in a distributed system. Systems consistent with the present invention provide identification services that may be deployed in a distributed system, including tools to deconstruct a complex identification service into service elements, provision service elements that are needed to make up the complex identification service, and monitor the service elements to ensure that the complex identification service is supported in a dynamic, robust fashion.
Exemplary Distributed System
The computers and devices of distributed system 100 provide services to one another. A “service” is a resource, data, or functionality that can be accessed by a user, program, device, or another service. Typical services include devices, such as reader devices, printers, displays, and disks; software, such as applications or utilities; and information managers, such as databases and file systems. These services may appear programmatically as objects of the Java programming environment and may include other objects, software components written in different programming languages, or hardware devices. As such, a service typically has an interface defining the operations that can be requested of that service.
Memory 202 can be, for example, a random access memory. Secondary storage device 204 can be, for example, a CD-ROM. CPU 206 can support any platform compatible with JVM 220. Input device 208 can be, for example, a keyboard or mouse. Output device 210 can be, for example, a printer.
JVM 220 acts like an abstract computing machine, receiving instructions from programs in the form of bytecodes and interpreting these bytecodes by dynamically converting them into a form for execution, such as object code, and executing them. RMI 218 facilitates remote method invocation by allowing objects executing on one computer or device to invoke methods of an object on another computer or device. Lookup Service 212 and Discovery Server 214 are described in detail below. Java space 222 is an object repository used by programs within distributed system 100 to store objects. Programs use Java space 222 to store objects persistently as well as to make them accessible to other devices within distributed system 100.
The Jini Environment
The Jini environment enables users to build and maintain a network of services running on computers and devices. Jini is an architectural framework provided by Sun Microsystems that provides an infrastructure for creating a flexible distributed system. In particular, the Jini architecture enables users to build and maintain a network of services on computers and/or devices. The Jini architecture includes Lookup Service 212 and Discovery Server 214 that enable services on the network to find other services and establish communications directly with those services.
Lookup Service 212 defines the services that are available in distributed system 100. Lookup Service 212 contains one object for each service within the system, and each object contains various methods that facilitate access to the corresponding service. Discovery Server 214 detects when a new device is added to distributed system 100 during a process known as boot and join, or discovery. When a new device is detected, Discovery Server 214 passes a reference to the new device to Lookup Service 212. The new device may then register its services with Lookup Service 212, making the device's services available to others in distributed system 100. One skilled in the art will appreciate that exemplary distributed system 100 may contain many Lookup Services and Discovery Servers.
Service provider 302 discovers and joins lookup service 306, making the services provided by service provider 302 available to other computers and devices in the distributed system. When service consumer 304 requires a service, it discovers lookup service 306 and sends a lookup request specifying the needed service to lookup service 306. In response, lookup service 306 returns a proxy that corresponds to service provider 302 to service consumer 304. The proxy enables service consumer 304 to establish contact directly with service provider 302. Service provider 302 is then able to provide the service to service consumer 304 as needed. An implementation of the lookup service is explained in “The Jini™ Lookup Service Specification,” contained in Arnold et al., The Jini™ Specification, Addison-Wesley, 1999, pp. 217-231.
Distributed systems that use the Jini architecture often communicate via an event handling process that allows an object running on one Java virtual machine (i.e., an event consumer or event listener) to register interest in an event that occurs in an object running on another Java virtual machine (i.e., an event generator or event producer). An event can be, for example, a change in the state of the event producer. When the event occurs, the event consumer is notified. This notification can be provided by, for example, the event producer.
Overview of Rio™ Architecture
The Rio architecture enhances the basic Jini architecture to provision and monitor complex services by considering a complex service as a collection of service elements. To provide the complex service, the Rio architecture instantiates and monitors a service instance corresponding to each service element. A service element might correspond to, for example, an application service or an infrastructure service. In general, an application service is developed to solve a specific application problem, such as processing identification information, word processing, or spreadsheet management. An infrastructure service, such as the Jini lookup service, provides the building blocks on which application services can be used. One implementation of the Jini lookup service is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,611, for “Dynamic Lookup Service in a Distributed System,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Consistent with the present invention, a complex service can be represented by an operational string.
Jini™ Service Beans
A Jini™ Service Bean (JSB) is a Java object that provides a service in a distributed system. As such, a JSB implements one or more remote methods that together constitute the service provided by the JSB. A JSB is defined by an interface that declares each of the JSBs remote methods using Jini™ Remote Method Invocation (RMI) conventions. In addition to its remote methods, a JSB may include a proxy and a user interface consistent with the Jini architecture.
Cybernode Processing
A JSB is created and receives fundamental life-cycle support from an infrastructure service called a “cybernode.” A cybernode runs on a compute resource, such as a computer or other data processing device. In one embodiment of the present invention, a cybernode runs as a Java virtual machine, such as JVM 220, on a computer, such as computer 102. Consistent with the present invention, a compute resource may run any number of cybernodes at a time and a cybernode may support any number of JSBs.
Service instantiator object 802 is used by cybernode 801 to register its availability to support JSBs and to receive requests to instantiate JSBs. For example, using the Jini event handling process, service instantiator object 802 can register interest in receiving service provision events from a service provisioner, discussed below. A service provision event is typically a request to create a JSB. The registration process might include declaring QoS capabilities 808 to the service provisioner. These capabilities can be used by the service provisioner to determine what compute resource, and therefore what cybernode, should instantiate a particular JSB, as described in greater detail below. In some instances, when a compute resource is initiated, its capabilities are declared to the cybernode 801 running on the compute resource and stored as QoS capabilities 808.
Service bean instantiator object 804 is used by cybernode 801 to create JSBs 806 when service instantiator object 804 receives a service provision event. Using JSB attributes contained in the service provision event, cybernode 801 instantiates the JSB, and ensures that the JSB and its corresponding service remain available over the network. Service bean instantiator object 804 can be used by cybernode 801 to download JSB class files from a code server as needed.
As described above, JSBs and cybernodes comprise the basic tools to provide a service corresponding to a service element in an operational string consistent with the present invention. A service provisioner for managing the operational string itself will now be described.
Dynamic Service Provisioning
A service provisioner is an infrastructure service that provides the capability to deploy and monitor operational strings. As described above, an operational string is a collection of service elements that together constitute a complex service in a distributed system. To manage an operational string, a service provisioner determines whether a service instance corresponding to each service element in the operational string is running on the network. The service provisioner dynamically provisions an instance of any service element not represented on the network. The service provisioner also monitors the service instance corresponding to each service element in the operational string to ensure that the complex service represented by the operational string is provided correctly.
If an instance of the next service is not running on the network (step 1206), then service provisioner 906 determines a target cybernode that matches the next service (step 1212). The process of matching a service instance to a cybernode is discussed below. Service provisioner 906 fires a service provision event to the target cybernode requesting creation of a JSB to perform the next service (step 1214). In one embodiment, the service provision event includes service bean attributes object 604 from service element 506. Service provisioner 906 then uses a lookup service to discover the newly instantiated JSB (step 1216) and starts a monitor corresponding to that JSB (step 1208).
Once a service instance is running, service provisioner 906 monitors it and directs its recovery if the service instance fails for any reason. For example, if a monitor detects that a service instance has failed, service provisioner 906 may issue a new service provision event to create a new JSB to provide the corresponding service. In one embodiment of the present invention, service provisioner 906 can monitor services that are provided by objects other than JSBs. The service provisioner therefore provides the ability to deal with damaged or failed resources while supporting a complex service.
Service provisioner 906 also ensures quality of service by distributing a service provision request to the compute resource best matched to the requirements of the service element. A service, such as a software component, has requirements, such as hardware requirements, response time, throughput, etc. In one embodiment of the present invention, a software component provides a specification of its requirements as part of its configuration. These requirements are embodied in service provision management object 602 of the corresponding service element. A compute resource may be, for example, a computer or a device, with capabilities such as CPU speed, disk space, connectivity capability, bandwidth, etc.
In one implementation consistent with the present invention, the matching of software component to compute resource follows the semantics of the Class.isAssignable( )method, a known method in the Java programming language. If the class or interface represented by QoS class object of the software component is either the same as, or is a superclass or superinterface of, the class or interface represented by the class parameter of the QoS class object of the compute resource, then a cybernode resident on the compute resource is invoked to instantiate a JSB for the software component. Consistent with the present invention, additional analysis of the compute resource may be performed before the “match” is complete. For example, further analysis may be conducted to determine the compute resource's capability to process an increased load or adhere to service level agreements required by the software component.
Enhanced Event Handling
Systems consistent with the present invention may expand upon traditional Jini event handling by employing flexible dispatch mechanisms selected by an event producer. When more than one event consumer has registered interest in an event, the event producer can use any policy it chooses for determining the order in which it notifies the event consumers. The notification policy can be, for example, round robin notification, in which the event consumers are notified in the order in which they registered interest in an event, beginning with the first event consumer that registered interest. For the next event notification, the round robin notification will begin with the second event consumer in the list and proceed in the same manner. Alternatively, an event producer could select a random order for notification, or it could reverse the order of notification with each event.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a service provisioner is an event producer and cybernodes register with it as event consumers. When the service provisioner needs to have a JSB instantiated to complete an operational string, the service provisioner fires a service provision event to all of the cybernodes that have registered, using an event notification scheme of its choosing.
Identification Service
Readers 1302 may be, for example, any type of device that reads or senses data, such as identification data. For example, readers 1302 may be conventional RFID readers such as the Alien Nanoscanner Reader, the ThingMagic Mercury 3 RFID Reader, or the Matrics Advanced Reader. A large identification system may have hundreds or even thousands of readers, so readers 1302 are typically simple, inexpensive devices that perform only basic data processing. Identification service 1304 may provide extensive data processing to transform the largely untouched scanned data from readers 1302 into useful data customized to meet the preferences and requirements of individual users 1306. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the system of
Identification service 1304 may also include a monitor service 1406, a registry service 1408, and a code server 1410 to support the provisioning of service components for identification service 1304. In one embodiment of the present invention, monitor service may be a Rio™ monitor implemented, for example, by service provisioner 906. As discussed above, a Rio™ monitor may detect when a service fails to ensure robust service provision. In this embodiment, registry service 1408 may be implemented as a Jini lookup service 212, described above, that enables services to establish communications with other services, and code server 1410 may be implemented as a code server 908, described above, that stores Java code files. Although
Using the Rio architecture, identification service 1304 may be implemented using an operational string as described above. Service elements of the operational string may be reader service 1402 and application service 1404. In this way, monitor service 1406, registry service 1408, and code server 1410 may be used to provision and monitor identification service 1304 to ensure a robust and flexible distributed implementation.
Application service 1404 may receive a report definition from users 1306. Users 1306 may use a web interface, such as an enterprise gateway (not shown) to generate report definitions and subscribe to reports generated by a report definition. For example, a user may define a report that provides notification of a number of items at a particular location, the location of a specific item, or the path an item has taken. A report definition derived from user input may be an XML based report definition. Based on criteria specified in an XML based report definition, one or more adapters 1502, data filter 1504, report filter 1505, and one or more loggers 1506 may be generated during run time.
Adapter 1503 may be, for example, a service element for interfacing with a reader service 1402. Adapter 1503 may receive RFID data from reader services 1402 as an event consumer using the enhanced event handling described above. This increases the feasibility and economy of identification service 1304. Adapter 1503 may function as an event listener (e.g., for data from readers) and/or an event producer (e.g., for data for a filter) using the enhanced event handling described above. An adapter may include a unique name, a Java class that implements the adapter, a set of properties, and a set of outputs. The properties may be, for example, a sequence of name value pairs that are passed to the adapter's constructor. The outputs may be, for example, a sequence of component names to be registered as event listeners to the adapter. The outputs may designate, for example, filter 1504, logger 1506, or a queue (not shown).
Criteria in a report definition may include reader identities, which may correspond to physical readers and/or logical readers. A logical reader identity may correspond to one or more physical reader identities. A user may wish to specify a logical reader when, for example, identities of physical readers are unknown or have been changed due to replacement. A logical reader identity may also be specified when it is possible to discern a physical location of an item by triangulating results from several physical readers. In such cases, a unique logical reader identity may correspond to each discernible location. Reader services 1402 may continually monitor registry service 1408 to discover physical and logical reader identities and maintain a list of discovered reader identities. Thus, application service 1404 may include one or more adapters 1503 for receiving RFID data from the reader services 1402 that support reader identities specified in a report definition.
Data filter 1504 may be used to process RFID data received from readers 1302. Data filter 1504 may include a unique name, a Java™ class that implements the filter, a set of properties, and a set of outputs. The properties may be, for example, a sequence of name value pairs that are passed to the filter's constructor. The outputs may be, for example, a sequence of component names that will be registered as event listeners to the filter. The outputs may designate, for example, report filter 1505.
Data filter 1504 may process RFID data received from reader 1302 based on criteria specified in a report definition (i.e., instructions), which may come from or on behalf of user 1306. Criteria specified in the report definition may include identification code patterns and external triggers. Identification code patterns may be used to include or exclude identification codes that match the specified identification code patterns. External triggers may include start and stop triggers for defining a period of time in which RFID data is collected (i.e., an “event cycle”). Alternatively, an event cycle may be defined by a start trigger and a duration. A report definition may specify start and stop triggers as Universal Resource Identifiers (URIs). Valid URIs may include Java Message Service (JMS) URIs, HTTP URIs, file URIs, and TCP URIs. A URI may specify an EPC pattern so that RFID data collection is triggered to start and/or stop upon detecting a match for the specified EPC pattern. An exemplary payload of a URI for a start trigger or a stop trigger may be an XML document such as, <Trigger fired=“true”/> or <Trigger fired=“false”/>. If a URI is not specified, a default may be to continually collect data until detection of a predetermined event.
RFID tags generate a much larger amount of data than traditional bar codes, much of which is often considered to be “noise,” meaning that it is of little or no use. Therefore, in addition to filtering data specified in a report definition, data filter 1504 may be designed to automatically filter out data from mis-read RFID tags and noise. Such automatic filtering may increase the accuracy of the resulting data.
Data filter 1504 may link to report filter 1505 using the enhanced event handling described above. Like data filter 1504, report filter 1505 may include a unique name, a Java™ class that implements the filter, a set of properties, and a set of outputs. The properties may be, for example, a sequence of name value pairs that are passed to the filter's constructor. The outputs may be, for example, a sequence of component names that will be registered as event listeners to the filter. The outputs may designate, for example, other filters 1504, logger 1506, or queue (not shown).
The processed data received from data filter 1504 may be a list of RFID tags and a list of readers that produced the RFID tags. Therefore, report filter 1505 may organize the processed data according to criteria specified in a report definition. The criteria may include a report set definition and a report output definition. A report set definition may define a set of EPCs to be considered for reporting. For example, a set of reported EPCs may be all currently read EPCs, additions from a previous event cycle, or deletions from a previous event cycle. A report output definition may define whether to include a list of EPCs in the report and whether to calculate and include a total number of EPCs in the report.
Logger 1506 may be implemented to notify users 1306 of reports of data from readers 1302 and may function as an event listener (e.g., for data from filters) and/or an event producer (e.g., for data for users). Logger 1506 may also be configured to transmit reports to users 1306 of RFID and non-RFID events using a protocol specified by individual users 1306, for example, by logging information to a file system, a JMS queue, a TCP socket, or a XML/HTTP file. For example, when a user 1306 registers a report subscription, an appropriate logger 1506 may be created during run time and dynamically linked to report filter 1505. Similarly, when a report subscription is removed by a user 1306, the corresponding logger 1506 may be terminated and disconnected from report filter 1505. Logger 1506 may include, for example, a unique name, a Java™ class that implements the logger, and a set of properties. The properties may be, for example, a sequence of name value pairs that are passed to the logger's constructor.
A report definition specifying criteria for adapter 1503, data filter 1504, report filter 1505, and logger 1506 may be expressed using, for example, an XML document. The following is program code for an exemplary report definition written as an XML document:
<?xml version=“1.0” encoding=“UTF-8”?>
<ale:ECSpec xmlns:ale=“urn.epcglobal:ale:xsd:1”
<logicalReaders>
</logicalReaders>
<boundarySpec>
</boundarySpec>
<reportSpecS>
<reportSet set=“ADDITIONS”/>
<output includeCount=“true”/>
</reportSpec>
</reportSpecs>
</ale:ECSpec>
In this exemplary code, the report definition is referred to as an Event Cycle Specification (ECSpec). The report definition above includes a section for specifying logical readers (e.g., “Dock Door 1”). The report definition also includes a section for specifying an event cycle temporal boundary (e.g., start trigger URI and duration of 60000 milliseconds). Finally, it includes a section for specifying data to be included in a report (e.g., ADDITIONS, meaning EPCs not read in a previous event cycle) and an indication to include a count of a total number of EPCs in the report.
Because adapter 1503, data filter 1504, report filter 1505, and logger 1506 may be implemented as event handler components, their component properties may be pre-configured with report definition criteria. In this manner, adapter 1503, data filter 1504, report filter 1505, and logger 1506 may be permanently associated with a particular reader 1302. The following is program code written as an XML document for an exemplary configuration file to support an application service 1404 permanently associated with a particular reader 1302:
In this exemplary code, the adapter section specifies a particular reader (e.g., Matrics Reader). The first filter section specifies report definition criteria for a data filter (e.g., a start trigger URI and a duration). The second filter section specifies report definition criteria for a report filter (e.g., CURRENT, meaning EPCs read in a current event cycle) and an indication to include a list of EPCs in the report. The logger section specifies a notification URI (e.g., a JMS queue).
The foregoing description of an implementation of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not exhaustive and does not limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practicing of the invention. Additional modifications and variations of the invention may be, for example, the described implementation includes software but the present invention may be implemented as a combination of hardware and software or in hardware alone. The invention may be implemented with both object-oriented and non-object-oriented programming systems.
For example, identification services consistent with the present invention may be implemented using, for example, the Java Management Extensions (JMX) technology to provide identification services that are accessible by management and monitoring applications. JMX Managed Beans may be created to implement components of the identification service and may be registered with a Jini lookup service. In this way, the JMX Managed Beans could be discovered and accessed by management applications. The JMX technology is described further at http://java.sun.com/products/JavaManagement/. The JMX technology may be implemented, for example, using the Java Dynamic Management Kit (JDMK).
Identification services consistent with embodiments of the present invention may also be implemented using Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Beans that may be accessible to network management systems such as Openview, Tivoli, and BMC Patrol. In this way, an identification service may be provided with unique management and monitoring capabilities.
Furthermore, one skilled in the art would recognize the ability to implement the present invention in many different situations. For example, the present invention can be applied to the telecommunications industry. A complex service, such as a telecommunications customer support system, may be represented as a collection of service elements such as customer service phone lines, routers to route calls to the appropriate customer service entity, and billing for customer services provided. The present invention could also be applied in any event processing system.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/767,345 for Dynamic Provisioning of Identification Services in a Distributed System, filed Jan. 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. This application also relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/947,528 for Dynamic Provisioning of Service Components in a Distributed System, filed Sep. 7, 2001, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/947,549 for Distributed Metric Discovery and Collection in a Distributed System, filed Sep. 7, 2001, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/390,895 for Systems and Methods for Providing Dynamic Quality of Service for a Distributed System, filed Mar. 19, 2003, which are relied upon and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3449669 | Granqvist | Jun 1969 | A |
4430699 | Segarra et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4491946 | Kryskow, Jr. et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4558413 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4567359 | Lockwood | Jan 1986 | A |
4713806 | Oberlander et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4800488 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4809160 | Mahon et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4819233 | Delucia et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823122 | Mann et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4939638 | Stephenson et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956773 | Saito et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
5088036 | Ellis et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5101346 | Ohtsuki | Mar 1992 | A |
5109486 | Seymour | Apr 1992 | A |
5187787 | Skeen et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5218699 | Brandle et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5253165 | Leiseca et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257369 | Skeen et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5293614 | Ferguson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297283 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303042 | Lewis et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307490 | Davidson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5311591 | Fischer | May 1994 | A |
5319542 | King, Jr. et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327559 | Priven et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5339430 | Lundin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339435 | Lubkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341477 | Pitkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5386568 | Wold et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390328 | Frey et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392280 | Zheng | Feb 1995 | A |
5423042 | Jalili et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5440744 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446901 | Owicki et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448740 | Kiri et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452459 | Drury et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455952 | Gjovaag | Oct 1995 | A |
5459837 | Caccavale | Oct 1995 | A |
5471629 | Risch | Nov 1995 | A |
5475792 | Stanford et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475817 | Waldo et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475840 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481721 | Serlet et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491791 | Glowny et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504921 | Dev et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506984 | Miller | Apr 1996 | A |
5511196 | Shackelford et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511197 | Hill et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524244 | Robinson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544040 | Gerbaulet | Aug 1996 | A |
5548724 | Akizawa et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548726 | Pettus | Aug 1996 | A |
5553282 | Parrish et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555367 | Premerlani et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5555427 | Aoe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557798 | Skeen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560003 | Nilsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561785 | Blandy et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5577231 | Scalzi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592375 | Salmon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594921 | Pettus | Jan 1997 | A |
5603031 | White et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617537 | Yamada et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628005 | Hurvig | May 1997 | A |
5640564 | Hamilton et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644720 | Boll et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5644768 | Periwal et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652888 | Burgess | Jul 1997 | A |
5655148 | Richman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659751 | Heninger | Aug 1997 | A |
5664110 | Green et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664111 | Nahan et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664191 | Davidson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666493 | Wojcik et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671225 | Hooper et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671279 | Elgamal | Sep 1997 | A |
5674982 | Greve et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675796 | Hodges et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675797 | Chung et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680573 | Rubin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680617 | Gough et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682534 | Kapoor et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684955 | Meyer et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689709 | Corbett et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694551 | Doyle et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706435 | Barbara et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710887 | Chelliah et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721825 | Lawson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721832 | Westrope et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724540 | Kametani | Mar 1998 | A |
5724588 | Hill et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727048 | Hiroshima et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727145 | Nessett et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729594 | Klingman | Mar 1998 | A |
5734706 | Windsor et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737607 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742768 | Gennaro et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745678 | Herzberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745695 | Gilchrist et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745703 | Cejtin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745755 | Covey | Apr 1998 | A |
5748897 | Katiyar | May 1998 | A |
5754849 | Dyer et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754977 | Gardner et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757925 | Faybishenko | May 1998 | A |
5758077 | Danahy et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758328 | Giovannoli | May 1998 | A |
5758344 | Prasad et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761507 | Govett | Jun 1998 | A |
5761656 | Ben-Shachar | Jun 1998 | A |
5764897 | Khalidi | Jun 1998 | A |
5764915 | Heimsoth et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764982 | Madduri | Jun 1998 | A |
5768532 | Megerian | Jun 1998 | A |
5774551 | Wu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774729 | Carney et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778179 | Kanai et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778187 | Monteiro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778228 | Wei | Jul 1998 | A |
5778368 | Hogan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784560 | Kingdon et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787425 | Bigus | Jul 1998 | A |
5787431 | Shaughnessy | Jul 1998 | A |
5790548 | Sistanizadeh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790677 | Fox et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799173 | Gossler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802367 | Held et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805805 | Civanlar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806042 | Kelly et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808911 | Tucker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809144 | Sirbu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809507 | Cavanaugh, III | Sep 1998 | A |
5812819 | Rodwin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813013 | Shakib et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815149 | Mutschler, III et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815709 | Waldo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815711 | Sakamoto et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818448 | Katiyar | Oct 1998 | A |
5829022 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832219 | Pettus | Nov 1998 | A |
5832529 | Wollrath et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5832593 | Wurst et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835737 | Sand et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842018 | Atkinson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844553 | Hao et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845090 | Collins, III et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845129 | Wendorf et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5860004 | Fowlow et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860153 | Matena et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864862 | Kriens et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864866 | Henckel et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872928 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875335 | Beard | Feb 1999 | A |
5878411 | Burroughs et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884024 | Lim et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884079 | Furusawa | Mar 1999 | A |
5887134 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
5887172 | Vasudevan et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889951 | Lombardi | Mar 1999 | A |
5889988 | Held | Mar 1999 | A |
5890158 | House et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892904 | Atkinson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905868 | Baghai et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913029 | Shostak | Jun 1999 | A |
5915112 | Boutcher | Jun 1999 | A |
5925108 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933497 | Beetcher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933647 | Aronberg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935249 | Stern et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940827 | Hapner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944793 | Islam et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946485 | Weeren et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946694 | Copeland et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949998 | Fowlow et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951652 | Ingrassia, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956509 | Kevner | Sep 1999 | A |
5960404 | Chaar et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961582 | Gaines | Oct 1999 | A |
5963924 | Williams et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963947 | Ford et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966435 | Pino | Oct 1999 | A |
5966531 | Skeen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969967 | Aahlad et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974201 | Chang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978484 | Apperson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978773 | Hudetz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982773 | Nishimura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987506 | Carter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991808 | Broder et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996075 | Matena | Nov 1999 | A |
5999179 | Kekic et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999988 | Pelegri-Llopart et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003050 | Silver et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003065 | Yan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003763 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009103 | Woundy | Dec 1999 | A |
6009413 | Webber et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009464 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014686 | Elnozahy et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016496 | Roberson | Jan 2000 | A |
6016516 | Horikiri | Jan 2000 | A |
6018619 | Allard et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023586 | Gaisford et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026414 | Anglin | Feb 2000 | A |
6031977 | Pettus | Feb 2000 | A |
6032151 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034925 | Wehmeyer | Mar 2000 | A |
6041351 | Kho | Mar 2000 | A |
6044381 | Boothby et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052761 | Hornung et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055562 | Devarakonda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058381 | Nelson | May 2000 | A |
6058383 | Narasimhalu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061699 | DiCecco et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061713 | Bharadhwaj | May 2000 | A |
6067575 | McManis et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078655 | Fahrer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085030 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085255 | Vincent et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092194 | Touboul | Jul 2000 | A |
6093216 | Adl-Tabatabai et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101528 | Butt | Aug 2000 | A |
6104716 | Crichton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108346 | Doucette et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6134603 | Jones et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154844 | Touboul et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157960 | Kaminsky et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182083 | Scheifler et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185602 | Bayrakeri | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185611 | Waldo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189046 | Moore et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192044 | Mack | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199068 | Carpenter | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199116 | May et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212578 | Racicot et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216138 | Wells et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216158 | Luo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219675 | Pal et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226746 | Scheifler | May 2001 | B1 |
6243716 | Waldo et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243814 | Matena | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247091 | Lovett | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253256 | Wollrath et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263350 | Wollrath et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263379 | Atkinson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269401 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272559 | Jones et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282295 | Young et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282568 | Sondur et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282581 | Moore et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292934 | Davidson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301613 | Ahlstrom et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321275 | McQuistan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327677 | Garg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6339783 | Horikiri | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343308 | Marchesseault | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351735 | Deaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360266 | Pettus | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363409 | Hart et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378001 | Aditham et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385643 | Jacobs et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6408342 | Moore et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418468 | Ahlstrom et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6505248 | Casper et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6564174 | Ding et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578074 | Bahlmann | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6603772 | Moussavi et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6604127 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604140 | Beck et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6654793 | Wollrath et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6704803 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6757262 | Weisshaar et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6757729 | Devarakonda et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801940 | Moran et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6801949 | Bruck et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804711 | Dugan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6804714 | Tummalapalli | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6988134 | Thorpe et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7075412 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7123608 | Scott et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7139821 | Shah et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7263597 | Everdell et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20010003824 | Schnier | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010011350 | Zabetian | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020059212 | Takagi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073019 | Deaton | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020111814 | Barnett et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030005132 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033280 | Van Den Hamer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030051029 | Reedy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051030 | Clarke et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084204 | Wollrath et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030155415 | Markham et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030191984 | Flaherty et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040263319 | Huomo | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267876 | Kakivaya et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 300 516 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0 351 536 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0 384 339 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 472 874 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 474 340 | Mar 1992 | EP |
497 022 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0 555 997 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 565 849 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0 569 195 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 625 750 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 635 792 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 651 328 | May 1995 | EP |
0 660 231 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 697 655 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 718 761 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 767 432 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 778 520 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 794 493 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 803 810 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 803 811 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 805 393 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0 810 524 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0 817 020 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 817 022 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 817 025 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 836 140 | Apr 1998 | EP |
2 253 079 | Aug 1992 | GB |
2 262 825 | Jun 1993 | GB |
2 305 087 | Mar 1997 | GB |
11-45187 | Feb 1999 | JP |
WO9207335 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO9209948 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO9325962 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO9403855 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO9603692 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO9610787 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO9618947 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO9624099 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO9802814 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO9804971 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO9917194 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO01-13228 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0186394 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0190903 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10767345 | Jan 2004 | US |
Child | 11146120 | US |