Traditionally, utility meters, such as gas meters, water meters, electricity meters, and the like, were read manually by employees of the associated utility providers. Manual meter reading represented a significant cost to the typical utility provider. With the advent of wireless technology, including mesh networking, utility providers have implemented methods and systems for remote reading and control of these utility meters. Advanced Metering Infrastructure (“AMI”), also known as Advanced Metering Management (“AMM”), are systems that measure, collect and analyze utility data using advanced metering devices such as electronic water meters, gas meters and electricity meters. The metering devices combine automated data measurements with network communications capability enabling the metering devices to transmit and receive data through the AMI network.
In a typical configuration, a metering device, such as a water meter, measures and collects usage data, such as water usage data, at a customer's location. The metering device then uses a built-in communication interface to transmit the usage data through the AMI network to the utility provider's systems, referred to herein as the “host.” The metering device may transmit the usage data to the host on a scheduled basis or in response to a request received from the host. In some instances, the AMI network may include a wireless network configured with a mesh networking topology, with the metering devices being amongst the many nodes of the mesh network. Other nodes may include control devices, data collection hubs, repeaters, gateways, and the like. All nodes of the mesh network may cooperate in the distribution of data through the AMI network. A metering device may transmit usage data to the host through one of a number of available paths, or “routes,” through the nodes of the mesh network. Each node may be assigned one or more parent nodes with which the node may communicate directly, with the parent nodes responsible for relaying the data through other nodes of the network to the intended destination.
Routing is one of the most costly and time consuming steps in installation of a mesh network. Because the usage data must be transmitted from the metering devices to the host on a timely basis, it is important that the assigned routes be reliable. When a new node is installed in the AMI network, it is usually provided a parent node by the installer. The best parent node may be guessed based on the location of the node and proximity to other nodes in the mesh network. However such guesses based on geographic proximity can be unreliable due to the unpredictable nature of radio links.
It is with respect to these and other considerations that the disclosure made herein is presented.
The present disclosure relates to technologies for dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network. According to some embodiments, a method of dynamically assigning a parent to an orphaned node of a mesh network comprises the node entering an orphan mode. While in the orphan mode, the node broadcasts an orphan notice over the mesh network to all neighboring nodes, i.e. remote nodes in communication range of the node. The neighboring nodes, upon receiving the orphan notice, add information regarding the orphaned node from the orphan notice to a neighbor list. The information may include communication parameters between the orphaned node and the neighboring node and/or an indication that the node is operating in orphan mode. The neighbor lists of the neighboring nodes are uploaded to a host that determines a new assignment of one or more parent nodes for the node determined based on the information regarding the orphaned node in the uploaded neighbor list. The host sends the parent node assignment back to the orphaned node that updates its configuration accordingly.
According to further embodiments, a computer-readable storage medium comprises processor-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to send a command message from a host computer to one or more nodes of a mesh network. The command message is configured to cause the nodes to collect communication parameters regarding neighboring nodes in the mesh network and to upload a neighbor list containing the communication parameters regarding the neighboring nodes to the host computer. The host then calculates a link score for the pairs of neighboring nodes in the mesh network based on the communication parameters in the uploaded neighbor lists and assigns one or more parent nodes to at least one of the nodes based on the calculated link scores. The host then sends a command message to the node causing the node to reconfigure based on the command message and begin communicating through the newly assigned one or more parent nodes.
According to further embodiments, a system comprises a device, such as a metering device, configured in an advanced metering infrastructure (“AMI”) network and an RF communication component operably connected to the device. The RF communication component comprises a processor and a memory containing a firmware, the firmware being configured to cause the processor to receive a discovery mode command message from a host in the AMI network. Upon receiving the discovery mode command message, the processor listens for communications between neighboring nodes on the AMI network, and, upon detecting a communication between neighboring nodes, adds information regarding a source node of the communications to a neighbor list. The processor then uploads the neighbor list to the host. The processor then receives an assignment of one or more parent nodes in the AMI network from the host, wherein the assignment of the one or more parent nodes defines a route through the AMI network for uploading data from the device to the host, and wherein the assignment of the one or more parent nodes is determined based on the information regarding the source node of the communication in the uploaded neighbor list.
These and other features and aspects of the various embodiments will become apparent upon reading the following Detailed Description and reviewing the accompanying drawings.
In the following Detailed Description, references are made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and that show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments or examples. The drawings herein are not drawn to scale. Like numerals represent like elements throughout the several figures.
The following detailed description is directed to technologies for dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network. Using the technologies described herein, a newly installed node in a mesh network may dynamically establish a parent based on network information regarding nodes and transmission statistics of nodes within communication range of the newly installed node. In addition, existing nodes may be provided with the capability of collecting information regarding the performance of communication links with other nodes within range, and forwarding that information to a server connected to the AMI network in order for the server to determine optimal parent assignment for the nodes in the network. This allows for the routing in the mesh network to be periodically and dynamically reconfigured, ensuring continued optimization and reliability of network.
Instead of relying on geographic proximity, the dynamic routing methods described herein rely on measurement of received signal strength indicator (“RSSI”) of transmissions from neighboring nodes providing a more reliable method of assessing the viability of a node-to-node link. Using the dynamic routing methods described herein, utility provider personnel spend less time routing units manually, thus reducing time and installation costs for new node(s). In addition, the dynamic routing methods may provide viable routes on the first routing attempt as well as providing secondary/alternate routes in the same routing pass, thus improving the reliability of the mesh network.
According to embodiments, the AMI network 100 may include a number of the devices 106, 108, 110, 112 configured in a mesh networking topology. The devices configured in the mesh network may comprise a collection of advance metering devices 106, data collection hubs 108, repeaters 110, gateways 112, and other devices or “nodes” communicating with each other using RF communication links, such as communication link 104D. The mesh network may comprise a routed network, with the nodes 106, 108, 110, 112 having predefined “parent” and “child” relationships based on a routing hierarchy determined for the network. Each node 106, 108, 110, 112 may be assigned one or more parent nodes with which the node may communicate directly, with the parent nodes responsible for relaying the data through other nodes of the mesh network to the intended destination. For example, a metering device 106F may send usage data to the host 102 by transmitting the data to its assigned parent node, meter 106B, which relays the data to its parent, hub 108A, which is in communication with the host over communication link 104B. As such, the route 114A (referred to herein generally as routes 114) for meter 106F to communicate with the host 102 may be determined by the parent and child relationships defined between the meter 106F, the meter 106B, and the hub 108A.
It will be appreciated that because a node may be assigned more than one parent node, multiple routes may exist between the node and the host 102. For example, meters 106D may be assigned two parent nodes comprising of meter 106C and hub 108B, resulting in two, independent routes 114B and 114C between meter 106D and the host 102. Other configurations of parent and child relationships may be imagined, including a single parent paired with a single child, and it is intended that all such configurations be included in this disclosure.
In some embodiments, the nodes 106, 108, 110, 112 of the wireless mesh network may employ frequency-hopping spread spectrum (“FHSS”) technology to transmit and receive data between them. For example, the nodes may be configured to comply with F.C.C. rules and regulations part 15 (47 C.F.R. §15). FHSS is a method of transmitting and receiving radio signals by rapidly switching among many frequency channels using a pseudorandom channel sequence known to both the transmitting and receiving devices. In order to increase battery life while increasing data transmission reliability and reducing system response times, each of the nodes 106, 108, 110 of the mesh network may operate in one of 3 states: a SLEEP state used to conserve battery life; a SLAVE state used for responding to and receiving data from a MASTER state device; and a MASTER state used to initiate communications with (i.e., “hail”) and send data to a SLAVE state device.
In SLEEP state, a device partially awakens and briefly listens for a “hailing” signal on a hailing channel from another device in MASTER state. If the device in SLEEP state fails to detect a hailing signal, the device remains in SLEEP state and periodically partially awakens to listen for a hailing signal. The SLEEP state device changes hailing channels based on a predefined pseudorandom hailing channel frequency set dependent upon a system time. Once the SLEEP state device is “hailed” by a MASTER state device, it fully awakens and begins listening for data messages from the MASTER state device on a predefined data channel selected from the predefined pseudorandom data channel frequency set, the data channel being indicated by the MASTER state device. In other words, the SLEEP state device exits SLEEP state and enters SLAVE state.
In SLAVE state, a device listens for and receives data messages on a data channel selected from the predefined pseudorandom data channel frequency set. The MASTER state device indicates which data channel to use by sending a data channel pointer to the target device during the hailing process. After receiving each message from the MASTER state device, the SLAVE state device sends an acknowledgement (“ACK”) message to the MASTER state device, indicating a successfully received data message. The SLAVE state device and the MASTER state device then switch to the next data channel in the data channel frequency set and continue communications until all data messages have been sent.
In MASTER state, a device “hails” a SLEEP state device by sending a hailing signal on a hailing channel to the targeted SLEEP state device. The MASTER state device selects which hailing channel to use based on: 1) the SLEEP state device's predefined pseudorandom hailing channel frequency set, 2) a system time corresponding to the hailing channel frequency set, and 3) an address or “node ID” of the SLAVE state device. The node ID is an identifier, such as an alphabetic and/or numeric string, associated with and unique to a device. The system time on the MASTER state device and the system time on the SLAVE state device are substantially in synchronization. Upon successfully “hailing” the sleeping device (which upon hailing becomes a SLAVE state device), the MASTER state device begins sending data messages on a data channel to the SLAVE state device. The data channel is selected from the SLAVE state device's predefined pseudorandom data channel set based on the system time. In some embodiments, the data channel frequency set is common to the MASTER state device and the SLAVE state device. In such a configuration, the MASTER state device may indicate to the SLAVE state device during the hailing procedure what the next available data channel is by sending to the SLAVE state device a data channel pointer.
In some embodiments, hailing channels and data channels are selected from the 902-928 MHz industrial, scientific, and medical (“ISM”) bandwidth. In some embodiments, one hundred (100) channels are chosen with a minimum channel spacing of 100 kHz each. Fifty (50) of the channels are randomly assigned to the pseudorandom data channel frequency set, and fifty (50) different channels are randomly assigned to the hailing channel frequency set. The set of fifty (50) hailing channels are used during the MASTER and SLEEP states to send and receive hailing requests while the set of fifty (50) data channels are used during the MASTER and SLAVE states to send and receive data messages.
A non-limiting, exemplary set of 50 hailing channels (from hailing channel 0 to hailing channel 49) is shown below in Table 1. In some embodiments, these hailing channels may be grouped into hailing channel groups. For example, hailing channel group 0 may include hailing channels 0 and 1 (908.15 MHz and 919.8 MHz), while hailing channel group 1 may include hailing channels 2 and 3 (922.65 MHz and 902.65 MHz), continuing through hailing channel group 24. More generally, hailing channel group “n” may include hailing channel “x” and hailing channel “x+1” where “x” represents a hailing channel. In other embodiments, hailing channel groups may include a different number or combination of hailing channels.
A non-limiting, exemplary set of 50 data channels (beginning with data channel 0 and continuing through data channel 49) is shown below in Table 2. In some embodiments, these data channels may be grouped into data channel groups. For example, data channel group 0 may include data channels 0 and 1 (922 MHz and 904.5 MHz), while data channel group 1 may include data channels 2 and 3 (908 MHz and 925 MHz), continuing through data channel group 24. More generally, data channel group “p” may include data channel “y” and data channel “y+1” where “y” represents a data channel. In other embodiments, data channel groups may include a different number or combination of data channels. In some embodiments, the data channels are not grouped.
In some embodiments, a particular device selects an initial subset of two (2) consecutive channels (i.e., a channel group) from its predefined pseudorandom hailing channel frequency set to be used while in the SLEEP state by first calculating a channel offset based on its node ID. This offset is added to a hailing channel pointer. The hailing channel pointer points to one of the fifty (50) available hailing channels, and increments to the next set of two (2) channels every, for example, 18 seconds so that each device will continuously “hop” through all of the fifty (50) available hailing channels at a system hopping rate. In this manner, hailing channel usage is spread across the predefined hailing channel. In some embodiments, the hailing channel usage may be substantially equal manner such that each channel within the hailing channel frequency set is used for substantially the same amount of time or for substantially the same number of times. In further embodiments, the hailing channel usage might be skewed to use hailing channels with less interference more frequently while using hailing channels with more interference less frequently. When sending and receiving data messages in MASTER and SLAVE states, the devices hop through the data channel frequency set to assure that, on average, all data channels are used equally.
It will be understood that, as used herein, “parent” and “child” nodes in the mesh network should not be confused with “MASTER state” and “SLAVE state” devices. MASTER state and SLAVE state are merely states/modes for each device. It will be further appreciated that the configuration of the mesh network comprising the AMI network 100 shown in
The RF communication component 200 may include a battery 205 that powers a transceiver integrated circuit (“IC”) 210, a processor 220, an RF power amplifier 230, an RF low-noise amplifier 240, and a memory 250. Crystal oscillators 215 and 225 are connected to the transceiver IC 210 and the processor 220, respectively. The RF communication component 200 further includes a transmit/receive switch 260 and antenna 270. The processor 220 may be a microprocessor, a microcontroller, a field-programmable gate array (“FPGA”), or the like. The processor 220 and the transceiver IC 210 may include both a two-way data and a two-way control line. In some embodiments, the Processor 220 includes a control line to each of the RF low-noise amplifier 240 and the transmit/receive switch 260. The processor 220 may also be connected to the memory 250 by both a two-way data line and by a battery status line, the battery line included so that flash memory may notify the processor 220 of its power and battery status.
The memory 250 may comprise a computer-readable storage medium for storing processor-executable instructions, data structures and other information. The memory 250 may include a non-volatile memory, such as read-only memory (“ROM”) and/or FLASH memory, and a random-access memory (“RAM”), such as dynamic random access memory (“DRAM”) or synchronous dynamic random access memory (“SDRAM”). The memory 250 may store a firmware that comprises commands and data necessary for the device 106, 108, 110 to communicate with other devices in the AMI network 100 as well as perform other operations of the RF communication component 200. According to some embodiments, the memory 250 may store processor-executable instructions that, when executed by the processor 220, perform portions of the routines 600 and 700 for dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network, as described herein.
In addition to the memory 250, the RF communication component 200 may have access to other computer-readable media storing program modules, data structures, and other data described herein for dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that computer-readable media can be any available media that may be accessed by the processor 220 or other computing system, including computer-readable storage media and communications media. Communications media includes transitory signals. Computer-readable storage media includes volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable storage media implemented in any method or technology for the non-transitory storage of information. For example, computer-readable storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, erasable programmable ROM (“EPROM”), electrically-erasable programmable ROM (“EEPROM”), FLASH memory or other solid-state memory technology, compact disc ROM (“CD-ROM”), digital versatile disk (“DVD”), high definition DVD (“HD-DVD”), BLU-RAY or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices and the like.
According to embodiments, the processor 220 may be further connected to other components of the device 106, 108, 110 through a device interface 280. In some embodiments, the device interface 280 may connect to an electronic utility meter component, such as a water meter or an electricity meter, that allows the meter to provide usage data for transmission through the wireless mesh network. In further embodiments, the device interface 280 may connect to a reporting and testing component, such as a water or gas leak detector, that allow status information and alarms regarding the utility provider's infrastructure to be transmitted through the AMI network 100 by the RF communication component 200. In still further embodiments, the device interface 280 may connect to a control component, such as an electronically actuated water valve, that allows the host 102 or other devices 106, 108, 110 on the AMI network 100 to control aspects of the utility provider's infrastructure. These examples are not meant to be limiting, and those of skill in the art will recognize that alternative device components that may be interfaced with the RF communication component 200 through the device interface 280.
It will be appreciated that the structure and/or functionality of the RF communication component 200 may be different that that illustrated in
The CPUs 304 perform the necessary operations by transitioning from one discrete, physical state to the next through the manipulation of switching elements that differentiate between and change these states. Switching elements may generally include electronic circuits that maintain one of two binary states, such as flip-flops, and electronic circuits that provide an output state based on the logical combination of the states of one or more other switching elements, such as logic gates. These basic switching elements may be combined to create more complex logic circuits, including registers, adders-subtractors, arithmetic logic units, floating-point units, or the like.
The chipset 306 provides an interface between the CPUs 304 and the remainder of the components and devices on the baseboard. The chipset 306 may provide an interface to a memory 308. The memory 308 may include a random access memory (“RAM”) used as the main memory in the computer 302. The memory 308 may further include a computer-readable storage medium such as a read-only memory (“ROM”) or non-volatile RAM (“NVRAM”) for storing basic routines that that help to startup the computer 302 and to transfer information between the various components and devices. The ROM or NVRAM may also store other software components necessary for the operation of the computer 302 in accordance with the embodiments described herein.
According to various embodiments, the computer 302 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computing devices through one or more networks 312, such as the wireless mesh network described herein, a local-area network (“LAN”), a wide-area network (“WAN”), the Internet, or any other networking topology known in the art that connects the computer 302 to the devices and other remote computers. The chipset 306 includes functionality for providing network connectivity through one or more network interface controllers (“NICs”) 310, such as a gigabit Ethernet adapter. For example, the NIC 310 may be capable of connecting the computer 302 to the devices 106, 108, 110 in the AMI network 100 as well as other computer devices in the utility provider's systems. It should be appreciated that any number of NICs 310 may be present in the computer 302, connecting the computer to other types of networks and remote computer systems beyond those described herein.
The computer 302 may be connected to a mass storage device 318 that provides non-volatile storage for the computer. The mass storage device 318 may store system programs, application programs, other program modules, and data, which are described in greater detail herein. The mass storage device 318 may be connected to the computer 302 through a storage controller 314 connected to the chipset 306. The mass storage device 318 may consist of one or more physical storage units. The storage controller 314 may interface with the physical storage units through a serial attached SCSI (“SAS”) interface, a serial advanced technology attachment (“SATA”) interface, a fiber channel (“FC”) interface, or other standard interface for physically connecting and transferring data between computers and physical storage devices.
The computer 302 may store data on the mass storage device 318 by transforming the physical state of the physical storage units to reflect the information being stored. The specific transformation of physical state may depend on various factors, in different implementations of this description. Examples of such factors may include, but are not limited to, the technology used to implement the physical storage units, whether the mass storage device 318 is characterized as primary or secondary storage, or the like. For example, the computer 302 may store information to the mass storage device 318 by issuing instructions through the storage controller 314 to alter the magnetic characteristics of a particular location within a magnetic disk drive unit, the reflective or refractive characteristics of a particular location in an optical storage unit, or the electrical characteristics of a particular capacitor, transistor, or other discrete component in a solid-state storage unit. Other transformations of physical media are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the present description, with the foregoing examples provided only to facilitate this description. The computer 302 may further read information from the mass storage device 318 by detecting the physical states or characteristics of one or more particular locations within the physical storage units.
The mass storage device 318 may store an operating system 320 utilized to control the operation of the computer 302. According to some embodiments, the operating system comprises the LINUX operating system. According to another embodiment, the operating system comprises the WINDOWS® SERVER operating system from MICROSOFT Corporation of Redmond, Wash. According to further embodiments, the operating system may comprise the UNIX or SOLARIS operating systems. It should be appreciated that other operating systems may also be utilized. The mass storage device 318 may store other system or application programs and data utilized by the computer 302, such as a routing modules 322 utilized by the computer to dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network, as described herein.
In some embodiments, the mass storage device 318 may be encoded with computer-executable instructions that, when loaded into the computer 302, may transform the computer from a general-purpose computing system into a special-purpose computer capable of implementing the embodiments described herein. These computer-executable instructions transform the computer 302 by specifying how the CPUs 304 transition between states, as described above. According to some embodiments, the mass storage device 318 may store computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the computer 302, perform portions of the routines 600 and 700 for dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network, as described herein. In further embodiments, the computer 302 may have access to other computer-readable storage medium in addition to or as an alternative to the mass storage device 318.
The computer 302 may also include an input/output controller 330 for receiving and processing input from a number of input devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, a touchpad, a touch screen, an electronic stylus, or other type of input device. Similarly, the input/output controller 330 may provide output to a display device, such as a computer monitor, a flat-panel display, a digital projector, a printer, a plotter, or other type of output device. It will be appreciated that the computer 302 may not include all of the components shown in
The neighbor list 402 may contain a number of remote node entries 404A-404D (referred to herein generally as remote node entry 404), each entry corresponding to a remote device or node within the mesh network with which the RF communication component 200 may communicate, i.e. is within communication range of the node containing the RF communication component. According to some embodiments, each remote node entry 404 may contain the node ID of the remote node. The node ID may represent a unique identifier of the remote node within the network 100, such as a MAC address of the node, for example. Each remote node entry 404 may further include a receive signal strength indicator (“RSSI”) measurement associated with the remote node. The RSSI measurement may indicate how much energy is present in a communication channel when the node is receiving communications from the remote node. The RSSI measurement may be obtained from the transceiver IC 210 of the RF communication component 200, for example.
Each remote node entry 404 may also contain a hop count for the remote node, indicating a number of network hops, or intervening nodes within the mesh network, between the remote node and the host 102, a hop count of 1 meaning that the remote node is in direct communication with the host. Each remote node entry 404 may also contain a load factor, indicating a relative number of child or ancestor nodes within the mesh network for which the corresponding remote node acts as a parent node. In some embodiments, each remote node entry 404 may also contain an upload hour, indicating a time slot in which the remote node performs routine uploads of data to the host 102.
According to further embodiments, each remote node entry 404 may contain an orphan flag 406. The orphan flag 406 may indicate that the remote node is operating in an orphan mode, having lost communication with its parent. The orphan flag 406 of the remote node entry 404 may be set by the RF communication component 200 when the information regarding the remote node is received in an orphan notice broadcast, as will be described in more detail below. It will be appreciated that additional data elements may be maintained in the neighbor list 402 for each remote node entry 404 beyond those described herein, and that not every data element or attribute described will be available for every remote node entry 404 in the neighbor list.
The neighbors list 502 may contain neighboring nodes entries 504A-504D (referred to herein generally as neighboring nodes entry 504), each entry corresponding to a pair of neighboring devices or node within the mesh network, i.e. a pair of nodes that are within communication range of each other. According to some embodiments, each neighboring nodes entry 504 may contain the node ID of the node that reported the communication parameters for the pair of nodes as well as the node ID of the remote node to which the communication parameters pertain. Each neighboring nodes entry 504 may further include the (“RSSI”) measurement measured by the reporting node for the remote node, and the hop count associated with the remote node. Each neighboring nodes entry 504 may also contain the load factor for the remote node.
According to further embodiments, each neighboring nodes entry 504 may also contain a link score 506. The link score 506 may indicate a relative viability of the communication link 104 between the neighboring nodes or devices 106, 108, 110 within the network and may be calculated by the routing module 322 from one or more of the communication parameters in the neighboring nodes entry 504 pertaining to the neighboring nodes. The link score 506 may be further utilized by the routing module 322 for dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network, as described below. In some embodiments, the link score 506 may be calculated from the RSSI measurement between the nodes. In further embodiments, the link score 506 may be calculated from an algorithm that combines the weighted value of the factors shown below in Table 3. The factors may be calculated from the communication parameters for the neighboring nodes from the corresponding neighboring nodes entry 504, as shown.
It will be appreciated that additional data elements may be maintained in the neighbors list 502 for each neighboring nodes entry 504 beyond those described herein, and that not every data element or attribute described will be available for every neighboring nodes entry 504 in the neighbors list.
According to some embodiments, the routine 600 may be performed by a combination of the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node, the communication component of neighboring node(s), and the routing module 322 of the host 102, as shown in the figure. In other embodiments, the routine 600 may be performed by the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node (device 106, 108, 110), by the host 102, by other processors or computing systems performing routing for the AMI network 100, or by some other combination of modules, processors and devices.
The RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node may enter the orphan mode when it is detected that communications with its assigned parent are lost, e.g. when successfully communications with its assigned parent have not been performed for some period of time or after some number of failures of handshake (hails) between node and parent have occurred. For example, the RF communication component 200 may enter orphan mode when it has been without a parent for 10 days. The RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node may also enter the orphan mode upon receiving a command from the host 102. For example, an administrator of the utility provider's infrastructure may cause the host 102 to send an orphan mode command message to one or more meters 106, hubs 108 and/or repeaters 110 in the AMI network 100 in order to initially perform routing in newly installed devices or optimize routing in an existing portion of the network. The RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node may also enter the orphan mode upon receiving input locally by an installer, repair technician, or other authorized personnel of the utility provider.
The routine 600 begins at step 602, where the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node broadcasts an orphan notice over the wireless network. For example, using the FHSS communications described above in regard to
Next, the routine proceeds from step 602 to step 604, where the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned mode begins to listen for neighbor notices from neighboring nodes or devices 106, 108, 110 in the mesh network for some listening period of time. According to some embodiments, all devices 106, 108, 110 on the wireless mesh network are configured to respond to orphan notices when received from any node within communication range. As shown at step 606, when an orphan notice is received at a neighboring node, the routine proceeds to step 608, where the RF communication component 200 of the neighboring node may respond to the broadcast orphan notice with a neighbor notice including the message elements or fields described below in Table 5.
In some embodiments, the neighboring node may wait a random period of time, such as between one minute and an hour, after receiving the orphan notice before sending the neighbor notice. According to some embodiments, the neighbor notice is sent to the orphaned node on one or more hailing channels depending on the FHSS channel selection algorithm, the current time, and the node ID of the orphaned node, as described above in regard to
In addition to responding to the orphan notice with the neighbor notice, the RF communication component 200 of the neighboring node further adds a remote node entry 404 for the orphaned node in its neighbor list 402, as shown at step 610. The remote node entry 404 may include at least the node ID of the orphaned and the RSSI measurement of the received orphan notice. The remote node entry 404 may further include the orphan flag 406 indicating that the remote node is operating in orphan mode. This new remote node entry 404 may be provided to the host 102 with the next upload of the neighbor list 402 from the neighboring node, as is described below in regard to step 618.
According to one embodiment, if a neighboring node receives a broadcast orphan notice from a node that is assigned as its child node in the mesh network, the neighboring node may attempt to sync with the orphaned node in order to re-establish communications with the node. If a hail is received from a purported parent node by a node operating in orphan mode, the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node may cancel the orphan mode and sync with the parent node, before returning to normal operation.
In some embodiments, the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node may enter a “super-sniff” state in order to listen for neighbor notices from neighboring nodes in the mesh network. In the super-sniff state, the orphaned mode may periodically wakeup from the SLEEP state and listens on all 50 hailing channels for the neighbor notices. Because the orphaned node may not have synched with its parent for an extended period of time, the system time maintained by the node may not be correct, and therefore relying on the channel selection algorithm may not yield the proper hailing channel(s) to which to listen for the neighbor notices. By using the super-sniff state, the orphaned node maximizes the chance of hearing the neighbor notices from all neighboring nodes within communication range.
If a neighbor notice is received from a neighboring node, as shown at step 612, the routine 600 proceeds to step 614, where the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node adds a remote node entry 404 for the neighboring node in its neighbor list 402, including at least the node ID of the neighboring node and the RSSI measurement of the received neighbor notice, along with the hop count, upload hour, and load factor included in the neighbor notice, if specified. The routine 600 next proceeds to step 616, where the RF communication component 200 determines whether the listening period has expired. For example, the RF communication component 200 may be configured to listen for neighbor notices for one hour after broadcasting its orphan notice. If the listening period has not expired, then the routine 600 returns to step 604, where the RF communication component 200 continues to listen for neighbor notices from neighboring nodes on the network.
At a subsequent time, the neighboring node uploads its neighbor list 402 to the host 102, as shown at step 618. The neighboring node may upload its neighbor list 402 on a regularly scheduled basis, for example, or in response to receiving the orphan notice from the orphaned node. Alternatively or additionally, the neighboring node may upload its neighbor list 402 in response to a request or command received from the host 102. As described above, the uploaded neighbor list 402 will contain the remote node entry 404 having the orphan flag 406 indicating that the orphaned node is operating in orphan mode, according to some embodiments.
In further embodiments, the orphaned node may also upload its neighbor list 402 to the host 102. According to some embodiments, if the orphaned node is not assigned a parent (e.g. it is newly installed), the RF communication component 200 may select a best node from its newly created neighbor list 402 as its parent node for transmitting the data containing the neighbor list to the host. For example, the RF communication component 200 may select the remote node in the neighbor list 402 having the highest RSSI measurement, the lowest hop count, and/or the like with which to communicate for uploading the neighbor list to the host 102. In other embodiments, if transmission of the neighbor list 402 fails for all of the configured parent nodes, the RF communication component 200 of the orphaned node may utilize a similar method to select a node from the neighbor list 402 with which to communicate in order to upload its neighbor list to the host.
As shown at step 620, the host 102 receives the neighbor lists 402 from the neighboring node(s) and/or the orphaned node. The routine 600 proceeds from step 620 to step 622, where the routing module 322 executing on the host 102 determines one or more parent nodes for the orphaned mode based on the link score 506 calculated for all of the neighboring nodes of the orphaned node. In some embodiments, the host 102 may wait some period after sending the orphan mode command to the node for any neighboring nodes (and possibly the orphaned node) to upload neighbor lists 402 to the host. For example, the host 102 may wait 3 days for all affected nodes to upload neighbor lists 402. The routing module 322 on the host may then add the remote node entries 404 from the uploaded neighbor lists 402 to the host's neighbors list 502, calculating a link score 506 for each pair of neighboring nodes, as described above in regard to
The routine 600 proceeds from step 622 to step 624, where the routing module 322 assigns the selected parent nodes to the orphaned node. For example, the routing module 322 may send a configuration command message to the orphaned node via one of the selected (primary) parent nodes to assign the selected parent(s) the orphaned node. In response to receiving a configuration command message from the host 102, the orphaned node then reconfigures based on the message and begins communicating through the newly assigned parent node(s), as shown at step 626. In a similar fashion, the routing module 322 may send configuration command message to multiple nodes based on the changed neighboring nodes entries 504 from the uploaded neighbor lists 402 and the recalculated link scores 506 in order to perform re-routing of a portion of the mesh network. From step 626, the routine 600 ends.
According to some embodiments, the orphan mode routine 600 described above may be utilized by a repeater 110 in the AMI network 100 in order to reroute the network in response to the new installation of the repeater or to optimize routing in an existing portion of the network. While the repeater 110 may have valid assigned parent nodes, it may enter the orphan mode upon receiving a command from the host 102 or upon receiving input locally by an installer, repair technician, or other authorized personnel. After sending the orphan notice and receiving neighbor notices from neighboring nodes, the repeater 110 may then upload its newly built neighbor list 402 to the host 102, where the information contained therein may be utilized by the routing module 322 to assign new parents to nodes within communication range of the repeater.
According to some embodiments, the routine 700 may be performed by a combination of the routing module 322 of the host 102 and the RF communication component 200 of the affected nodes (devices 106, 108, 110) in the mesh network, as shown in the figure. In other embodiments, the routine 700 may be performed by the host 102, by the RF communication component 200 of one or more devices 106, 108, 110, by other processors or computing systems performing routing for the AMI network 100, or by some other combination of modules, processors and devices.
The routine 700 begins at step 702, where the routing module 322 on the host 102 sends a discovery mode command message to one or more nodes or devices 106, 108, 110 on the mesh network. The discovery mode command message may be sent periodically by the routing module 322 as part of a scheduled re-routing routine for the subset of nodes, or may be sent in response to an action by an administrator of the utility provider's infrastructure. For example, the administrator may select the subset of nodes for which dynamic re-routing is to be performed, thereby causing the routing module 322 to send the discovery mode command message to the selected nodes. According to some embodiments, the discovery mode command message may include a start time and duration in which to the node(s) are to operate in discovery mode. In other embodiments, the discovery mode command message further includes a number of times, e.g. a number of days, that the discovery mode process should be repeated. In some embodiments, the nodes of the wireless mesh network may be configured to enter discovery mode at some scheduled time, without having to receive a discovery mode command message from the host 102.
Next, the routine proceeds from step 702 to step 704, where the RF communication components 200 of the affected nodes begin to listen for all communications from neighbor nodes or devices 106, 108, 110 in the mesh network the specified duration. In some embodiments, the RF communication component 200 utilizes a “promiscuous” state in order to listen for communications between neighboring nodes in the mesh network. Similar to the super-sniff state described above, the RF communication component 200 in the promiscuous state periodically wakeups from the SLEEP state and listens to one or more of the 50 hailing channels and/or 50 data channels for communication traffic. In some embodiments, the RF communication component may listen on all 50 hailing channels and/or data channels for traffic. According to embodiments, the RF communication component 200 may scan a subset of the hailing and/or data channels for some period before returning to the SLEEP state.
At step 706, when a communication between neighboring nodes is detected, e.g. when the RSSI on the scanned channel is above some threshold indicating a transmission is taking place, the routine 700 proceeds to step 708, where the RF communication component 200 of the node adds a remote node entry 404 to its neighbor list 402, including at least the source node ID and the RSSI measurement of the detected communication. The routine 700 next proceeds to step 710, where the RF communication component 200 determines whether the specified listening duration has expired. If the listening duration has not expired, then the routine 700 returns to step 704, where the RF communication component 200 continues to scan the hailing and/or data channels for communications between neighboring nodes.
If the listening period has expired, then the routine 700 proceeds from step 710 to step 712, where the RF communication components 200 of the affected nodes upload their neighbor lists 402 to the host 102. The neighbor list 402 may be uploaded to the host 102 using the existing routes, e.g. the existing parent assignments, in the mesh network. From step 712, the routine 700 proceeds to step 714, where the routing module 322 executing on the host determines one or more parent nodes for the affected nodes based on the link score 506 calculated for all of the neighboring nodes entries 504 updated from the uploaded neighbor lists 402. In some embodiments, the host 102 may wait some period after sending the discovery mode command to the nodes for the affected nodes to upload their neighbor lists 402. For example, the host 102 may wait 3 days for all affected nodes to upload neighbor lists 402. The routing module 322 on the host may then add the remote node entries 404 from the uploaded neighbor lists 402 to the host's neighbors list 502, and recalculate link scores 506 for each pair of neighboring nodes, as described above in regard to
The routine 700 proceeds from step 714 to step 716, where the routing module 322 assigns the selected parent nodes to the orphaned node. For example, the routing module 322 may send configuration command messages to the affected nodes via the existing routes in the mesh network to assign the selected parent(s) to each node. In response to receiving a configuration command message from the host 102, the target node then reconfigures based on the message and begins communicating through the newly assigned parent node(s). From step 716, the routine 700 ends.
Based on the foregoing, it will be appreciated that technologies for dynamically determining and assigning parent nodes and routes for nodes in a mesh network are presented herein. While embodiments are described herein in regard to devices 106, 108, 110 of an AMI network 100, those having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the present disclosure may be utilized in other types mesh networking environments, both wired and wireless, where nodes communicate in a routed fashion, are configured with one or more parent-child relationships. The above-described embodiments are merely possible examples of implementations, set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the present disclosure.
The logical operations, functions or steps described herein as part of a method, process or routine may be implemented (1) as a sequence of processor-implemented acts, software modules or portions of code running on a controller or computing system and/or (2) as interconnected machine logic circuits or circuit modules within the controller or computing system. The implementation is a matter of choice dependent on the performance and other requirements of the system. Alternate implementations are included in which operations, functions or steps may not be included or executed at all, may be executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those reasonably skilled in the art of the present disclosure.
It will be further appreciated that conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more particular embodiments or that one or more particular embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the present disclosure. Further, the scope of the present disclosure is intended to cover any and all combinations and sub-combinations of all elements, features and aspects discussed above. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of the present disclosure, and all possible claims to individual aspects or combinations of elements or steps are intended to be supported by the present disclosure.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 691904 | Hallbergh | Jan 1902 | A |
| 1165429 | Mass | Dec 1915 | A |
| 1788618 | Cover | Jan 1931 | A |
| 1808209 | Earl | Jun 1931 | A |
| 1808212 | Earl | Jun 1931 | A |
| 2302529 | Cornell et al. | Nov 1942 | A |
| 3254660 | Ray | Jun 1966 | A |
| 3593957 | Dolter et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3653261 | Feldman | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3672233 | Hjermstad | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3705385 | Batz | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3731534 | Painley et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3795144 | Marchesi | Mar 1974 | A |
| 4093997 | Germer | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4120031 | Kincheloe et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4126338 | Coel | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4291375 | Wolf | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4388690 | Lumsden | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4414633 | Churchill | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4442492 | Karlsson et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4465970 | DiMassimo et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4516213 | Gidden | May 1985 | A |
| 4542469 | Brandberry et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4591988 | Klima et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4707852 | Jahr et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4727900 | Dooling et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4778204 | Berger | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4792946 | Mayo | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4803632 | Frew et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4833618 | Verma et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4868566 | Strobel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4881070 | Burrowes et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4901751 | Story | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4940976 | Gastouniotis et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4953403 | Springer | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4967996 | Sonoda et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4989830 | Ratnik | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5056107 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5075792 | Brown et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5079715 | Venkataraman et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5121344 | Laage et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5239575 | White et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5251480 | Brunson, IV et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5261275 | Davis | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5267587 | Brown | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5298894 | Cerny et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5371734 | Fischer | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5381136 | Powers et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5434911 | Gray et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437481 | Spears et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5438329 | Gastounioulis et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5451938 | Brennan, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5459459 | Lee | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5481259 | Bane | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5493287 | Bane | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5509567 | Lindahl | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5519387 | Besier et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525898 | Lee et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5553094 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5590179 | Shincovich et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5594740 | LaDue | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594776 | Dent | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5617084 | Sears | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5631554 | Briese et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5654692 | Baxter, Jr. et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5655299 | Lindahl | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5666655 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5673252 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5708195 | Kurisu et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5714931 | Petite | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5746344 | Syler et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5748104 | Argyroudis et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5751797 | Saadeh | May 1998 | A |
| 5754101 | Tsunetomi et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5767790 | Jovellana | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5787358 | Takahashi | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5801643 | Williams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815086 | Ivie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5852658 | Knight et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5877703 | Bloss et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892441 | Woolley et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5907491 | Canada et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5924051 | Provost et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926103 | Petite | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926531 | Petite | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5940009 | Loy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5963146 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5963557 | Eng | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5971011 | Price | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5979863 | Lousberg | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986573 | Franklin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5994892 | Turino et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5996608 | Hunter | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006212 | Schleich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6028522 | Petite | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028855 | Hirsch | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031455 | Grube et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031466 | Leshets et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6044062 | Brownrigg et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6058374 | Guthrie et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6060994 | Chen | May 2000 | A |
| 6069571 | Tell | May 2000 | A |
| 6081204 | Lavoie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6115677 | Perthold et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6150955 | Tracy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6152173 | Makowan | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6163276 | Irving et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6172616 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6178816 | Katzman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6195018 | Ragle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6208266 | Lyons et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6218953 | Petite | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233327 | Petite | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246677 | Nap et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249516 | Brownrigg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6288641 | Casais | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6317051 | Cohen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6333975 | Brunn et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6373399 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6392538 | Shere | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6405047 | Moon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6424270 | Ali | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6426027 | Scarborough et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430268 | Petite | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6453247 | Hunaidi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6456197 | Lauritsen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6470903 | Reyman | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6493377 | Schilling et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6512463 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6528957 | Luchaco | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6536469 | Dilger et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6538577 | Ehrke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6560543 | Wolfe et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6564159 | Lavoie et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6568416 | Tucker | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6577961 | Holdsclaw et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6581458 | Hathaway et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6618578 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6618709 | Sneeringer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6624750 | Marman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6628207 | Hemminger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6628764 | Petite | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6633781 | Lee et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6653945 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6657552 | Belski et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6675071 | Griffin, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6677861 | Henry et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6701956 | Berger | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6710721 | Holowick | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6747557 | Petite et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6798352 | Holowick | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6816072 | Zoratti | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6836737 | Petite et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6847300 | Yee et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6848303 | Oeder et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6880567 | Klaver | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6912472 | Mizushina et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6914533 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6914893 | Petite | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6931445 | Davis | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6946972 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952970 | Furmidge | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6954701 | Wolfe | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6954814 | Leach | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6972677 | Coulthard | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6978210 | Suter et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6980079 | Shintani et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6982651 | Fischer | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7008239 | Ju | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7009530 | Zigdon et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7012546 | Zigdon et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7042368 | Patterson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053767 | Petite et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7054271 | Brownrigg | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7061924 | Durrant et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7072945 | Nieminen | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7079810 | Petite et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7088239 | Basinger et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7089125 | Sonderegger | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7099781 | Heidl et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7103511 | Petite | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7111817 | Teti et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7117051 | Landry et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7123628 | Hwang | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124184 | Chung et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7137550 | Petite | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7142107 | Kates | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143645 | Benson et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7228726 | Kates | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7248179 | Smit | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248181 | Patterson et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250874 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7256704 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7263073 | Petite et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7267014 | Winter | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7272635 | Longtin et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7292143 | Drake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7295128 | Petite | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7301456 | Han | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7304587 | Boaz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315257 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7342504 | Crane et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346030 | Cornwall | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7349766 | Rodgers | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7353280 | Chiles et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7356614 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363031 | Aisa | Apr 2008 | B1 |
| 7385524 | Orlosky | Jun 2008 | B1 |
| 7397907 | Petite | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7412882 | Lazar et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7417557 | Osterloh et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7423985 | Hill | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7424527 | Petite | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7443313 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7444401 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7453373 | Cumeralto et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7468661 | Petite et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7478108 | Townsend et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7480501 | Petite | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7526539 | Hsu | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7533693 | Colton et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7549439 | Kimura et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7604216 | Gebler | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7650425 | Davis | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7671480 | Pitchford et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7690393 | Nagle et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7694934 | Irwin | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7696940 | MacDonald | Apr 2010 | B1 |
| 7697492 | Petite | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7739378 | Petite | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7740024 | Brodeur | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7746246 | Salser | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7752309 | Keyghobad et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7756086 | Petite | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7760703 | Kubler et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7775422 | Winter et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7783738 | Keyghobad et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7792946 | Keyghobad et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7806382 | Palumbo et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
| 7817063 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7825793 | Spillman et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7843379 | Menzer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7854165 | Ball | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7870080 | Budike, Jr. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7880641 | Parris et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7962101 | Vaswani et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7980317 | Preta et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 8014791 | Guigne et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8047072 | Ball | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8109131 | Winter | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8140667 | Keyghobad et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8249042 | Sparr et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8281654 | Ball | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8300626 | Thubert et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8351409 | Albert et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8391177 | Picard | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8407333 | Keyghobad | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8549131 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8660134 | Splitz | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8823509 | Hyland | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8833390 | Ball et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8855569 | Splitz | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8931337 | Renoud | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8931505 | Hyland et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 9202362 | Hyland | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 20010010032 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010013488 | Fukunaga et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024163 | Petite | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048030 | Sharood et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013679 | Petite | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020019725 | Petite | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020031101 | Petite | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051546 | Bizjak | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062392 | Nishikawa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020067717 | Raschke et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073183 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020089802 | Beckwith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130768 | Che et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020159434 | Gosior et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169643 | Petite et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190956 | Klein et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009515 | Lee et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018733 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018776 | Yoon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030034900 | Han | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036810 | Petite | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046377 | Daum et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030074109 | Jeong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076241 | Middleton | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093484 | Petite | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030107485 | Zoratti | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174070 | Garrod et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010561 | Kim et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054747 | Breh et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129312 | Cuzzo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139210 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158333 | Ha et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040183687 | Petite et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050067022 | Istre | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050072214 | Cooper | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050078631 | Cornwell | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050084418 | Hill et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050096753 | Arling | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050104747 | Silic et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121880 | Santangelo | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050159823 | Hayes | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190784 | Stine | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195768 | Petite et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195775 | Petite et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050201379 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050201397 | Petite | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050203647 | Landry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246295 | Cameron | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050251367 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060012491 | Mahowald | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028355 | Patterson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041655 | Holloway et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060046664 | Paradiso et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098576 | Brownrigg et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060158347 | Roche et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060181414 | Bandy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187866 | Werb | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060201550 | Blyth et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060218266 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060273896 | Kates | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060284784 | Smith et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070059986 | Rockwell | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070063866 | Webb | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091825 | Budampati et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070284293 | Pitchford et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070293221 | Hwang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298779 | Wolman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080030319 | McKenna et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043637 | Rahman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080061769 | Junk et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080084260 | Swartzentruber | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080086560 | Monier et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080095403 | Benhammou | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080109090 | Esmaili et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080149180 | Parris et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150750 | Parris et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080169910 | Greene et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080186898 | Petite | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080189056 | Heidl et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195329 | Prince et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080240078 | Thubert | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281534 | Hurley | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291054 | Groft | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090044628 | Lotscher | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058676 | Orlosky | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090066524 | Yukawa et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090068947 | Petite | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090121860 | Kimmel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090133887 | Garcia et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090153357 | Bushman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090188313 | Ball | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090215424 | Petite | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090243840 | Petite et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090255346 | Hendey et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271045 | Savelle et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090287838 | Keyghobad et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090301571 | Ruhs | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309755 | Williamson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322453 | Kawaguchi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100017465 | Brownrigg et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100039984 | Brownrigg | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100060479 | Salter | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100097988 | Chung | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100156632 | Hyland et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100194582 | Petite | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100250054 | Petite | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265909 | Petite et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100295672 | Hyland et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312881 | Davis et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100329232 | Tubb et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110018762 | Walley et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110030482 | Meeusen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110044276 | Albert et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110066297 | Saberi | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110079402 | Darby et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110108136 | Margalit et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110140909 | Olson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20120007744 | Pal et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120068476 | Bradfield | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120068477 | Bradfield | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120106518 | Albert et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120271686 | Silverman | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120305084 | Ball | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130064159 | Edwards | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130083722 | Bhargava et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130094537 | Hui et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130107772 | Splitz et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130109319 | Splitz | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130181848 | Picard | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130214883 | Yano | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2009308949 | May 2010 | AU |
| 2010249499 | May 2015 | AU |
| 2011265675 | May 2015 | AU |
| 2014259545 | Nov 2015 | AU |
| 2476119 | Feb 2005 | CA |
| 2650174 | Jul 2012 | CA |
| 1185838 | Jun 1998 | CN |
| 19757581 | Jul 1998 | DE |
| 2305333 | Apr 1997 | GB |
| 62-295674 | Dec 1987 | JP |
| 05-253316 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 06-223279 | Aug 1994 | JP |
| 6300606 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| 07-116285 | May 1995 | JP |
| 07231363 | Aug 1995 | JP |
| H10-2744 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| H102744 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 11-046254 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| H11210028 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 2000131179 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2000285356 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2002310840 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2002352361 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2005315663 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2005321935 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006062414 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2006062716 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2006285645 | Oct 2006 | JP |
| 2007047139 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2008198044 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| 2010068017 | Mar 2010 | JP |
| 2012507090 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2012527706 | Nov 2012 | JP |
| 2013528732 | Jul 2013 | JP |
| H5654124 | Nov 2014 | JP |
| 9810299 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 9810394 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| 2008087911 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2009057214 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2010051287 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010135587 | Nov 2010 | WO |
| 2011159403 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ball, Marty Scott, Notice of Allowance for U.S Appl. No. 12/326,240, filed Jan. 20, 2009, mailed Aug. 9, 2010, 10 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/356,240, filed Jan. 20, 2009, mailed Dec. 1, 2010; 1 pg. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Metwr With Metal Threads under U.S. Appl. No. 12/356,240, filed Jan. 20, 2009; 17 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010, mailed Oct. 12, 2011; 1 pg. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010, mailed May 2, 2011; 11 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010, mailed Aug. 10, 2011; 5 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Meter With Metal Threads under U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,272, filed Nov. 16, 2010; 15 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott, Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, mailed May 7, 2012; 10 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, mailed Sep. 19, 2012; 1 pg. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Miscellaneous Communication to Applicant for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011; mailed Jun. 14, 2012; 4 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, mailed Feb. 17, 2012; 5 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, mailed Aug. 23, 2012; 9 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Meter With Metal Threads; under U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011; 14 pgs. |
| Ball; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,739, filed Aug. 30, 2011, mailed Nov. 15, 2011, 7 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/646,892, filed Oct. 8, 2012, mailed Jun. 7, 2013; 10 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/646,892, filed Oct. 8, 2012, mailed Sep. 17, 2013, 6 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Non-Metallic Enclusure With Metal Threads, U.S. Appl. No. 13/646,892, filed Oct. 8, 2012, 14 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Nov. 11, 2015, 1 pg. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Oct. 13, 2015, 4 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method having U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,725, filed Oct. 30, 2015, 28 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott, Office Action from Canadian Intellectual Property Office for Application No. 2,650,174, filed Jan. 19, 2009, mailed Sep. 8, 2011, 3 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott, Office Action from Canadian Intellectual Property Office for serial No. 2,650,174, filed Jan. 19, 2009, mailed Dec. 7, 2010; 2 pages. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Canadian Office Action for serial No. 2,777,585, filed Jan. 19, 2009, mailed Oct. 21, 2013, 2 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination report for serial No. 2015202223, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Nov. 4, 2015, 4 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2014-234642, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Nov. 4, 2015,9 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Entitled: Plastic Water Meter, under U.S. Appl. No. 61/022,088, filed Jan. 18, 2008, 10 pgs. |
| McCraven, Jeremy; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, mailed Dec. 8, 2015, 18 pgs. |
| McCraven, Jeremy; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Mechanical Stop for Actuator and Orifice, U.S. Appl. No. 14/73,823, filed May 9, 2014, 40 pgs. |
| Dukes, Brent; International Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/US15/44140, filed Aug. 7, 2015, mailed Dec. 30, 2015, 15 pgs. |
| Article entitled, “GF Piping Systems' New Metal-to-Plastic Transition Fittings Provide Strong, Leak-Proof Seals”, Nov. 13, 2007, pp. 1-6; http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/536342. |
| Brochure entitled, “DoubleSafe tm Transition Fillings from GF Piping Systems” Georg Fischer Piping Systems; date unknown when published: accessed on Oct. 1, 2008; pp. 1-2 http://www.us.piping.georgefischer.com/go/F017C7DA19993E1D340739AFBC4B677E?action=GF—Docu. |
| Brochure entitled, “Polyrac and Polyfast”, date unknown when published; accessed on Jun. 1, 2009; pp. 1-8; http://www.cn.piping.georgfischer.com/doc/doc—download.cfm?B81010EAD6OEB5F06E54F6B04231161F. |
| Brochure entitled, “Section 1, Schedule 80 PVC Piping System,” Mar. 27, 2006, pp. 1.1-1.32; http://web.archive.org/web/20060816045129/http://www.gfpiping.com/downloads/vinyls/01-Sch80PVC.pdf. |
| Brochure entitled, “Section 2, Schedule 80 CPVC Piping System,” Mar. 27, 2006, pp. 2.1-2.28; http://web.archive.org/web/20060816045129/http://www.gfpiping.com/downloads/vinyls/02-Sch80CPVC.pdf. |
| Brochure entitled, “The World Needs Solutions, We Have Them!,” date unknown when published' accessed on Oct. 1, 2008; pp. 1-12; http://www.plasticsystems.co.nz/booklets/Civil%20Infrastructure/+GF+%20Utilities%20Brochure.pdf. |
| Brochure entitled, “Transition Fittings, Strong and Reliable Metal-to-Plastic Transitions”, BR-2-0305; date unknown when published; accessed on Oct. 1, 2008; pp. 1-2 http://plascowelding.com/pdf2007/PVC&CPVCPipeandFittings/Thermoplastic-Fittings/PVC&CPVC-Metal. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Canadian Office Action for serial No. 2,741,843, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Dec. 8, 2015, 5 pgs. |
| Splitz, David; PCT Application entitled: Systems and Methods for Dynamic Squelching in Radio Frequency Devices having serial No. PCT/US12/022060, filed Jan. 20, 2012, 50 pgs. |
| Splitz, David; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US12/22060, filed Jan. 20, 2012, mailed May 8, 2014, 6 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Automatic Discovery of Nodes in a Mesh Network, U.S. Appl. No. 61/779,892, filed Mar. 13, 2013; 110 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/557,754, filed Dec. 2, 2014, mailed Jan. 19, 2016, 101 pgs. |
| Hyland; European Examination Report for serial No. EP09824079.9, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Nov. 13, 2015; 6 pgs. |
| McCraven, Jeremy; Applicant Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, mailed Jan. 12, 2016, 3 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Apr. 16, 2015, 47 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/00609, filed May 25, 2012, mailed Mar. 19, 2015, 3 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Extended European Search Report for serial No. 12844451.0, filed Jan. 20, 2012, mailed Apr. 21, 2015, 8 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/451,896, filed Aug. 5, 2014, mailed Mar. 18, 2016, 98 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,452, filed Aug. 4, 2014, mailed Feb. 17, 2016, 98 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, mailed Mar. 4, 2016, 94 pgs. |
| McCraven, Jeremy; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, mailed Apr. 12, 2016, 86 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/00609, filed May 25, 2012, mailed May 26, 2015, 5 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Examination Report for serial No. 2014259545, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Jun. 10, 2015; 2 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2014-234642, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Jul. 7, 2015, 9 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Jul. 27, 2015, 19 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods having U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,676, filed Sep. 9, 2015, 29 pgs. |
| Dukes, Brent; PCT Application entitled: Dunamic Ruoting in a Mesh Network having serial No. PCT/US15/44140, filed Aug. 7, 2015, 41 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, mailed Aug. 27, 2014, 1 pg. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, mailed Mar. 11, 2014, 75 pgs. |
| U.S. Application Ball, Marty Scott; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, mailed Jun. 24, 2014, 29 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011, mailed Aug. 12, 2014, 4 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Valve Meter Assembly and Method under U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,720, filed May 31, 2011; 56 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Valve Meter Assembly and Method, U.S. Appl. No. 14/451,896, filed Aug. 5, 2014; 56 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Applicant Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Feb. 18, 2014, 4 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Dec. 17, 2013, 54 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Apr. 10, 2013, 80 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Sep. 22, 2014, 49 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Oct. 18, 2012; 44 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Apr. 8, 2014, 43 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Sep. 6, 2013; 53 pgs. |
| Hyland; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method, having U.S. Appl. No. 12/606,957, filed Oct. 27, 2009, 30 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Feb. 11, 2014; 37 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, mailed May 29, 2013, 71 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Aug. 13, 2014. 1 pg. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Sep. 10, 2012, 35 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Apr. 23, 2014, 20 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Aug. 1, 2014, 4 pgs. |
| Hyland; U.S. Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods, having U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, 32 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; U.S. Continuation Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods, having U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,452, filed Aug. 4, 2014, 32 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002, mailed Oct. 8, 2008; 1 pg. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Requirement for Restriction/ Election for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300; filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed Feb. 9, 2006; 11 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452 filed Oct. 1, 2008 mailed Jun. 16, 2010; 1 pg. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, mailed Feb. 29, 2012; 1 p. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, mailed Mar. 21, 2011; 9 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, mailed Oct. 4, 2010; 13 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867 filed Jun. 24, 2006, mailed Sep. 7, 2011; 6 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009, mailed Nov. 2, 2011; 17 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,867, filed Jun. 24, 2009; 33 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925 filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Aug. 18, 2010; 1 pg. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-final office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Dec. 23, 2009; 17 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Aug. 2, 2010; 8 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957, filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Aug. 4, 2010; 1 pg. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957, filed Jun. 24, 2009; 33 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012, mailed Mar. 6, 2013, 1 pg. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 23, 2012; mailed May 25, 2012; 17 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012, mailed Jul. 27, 2012; 11 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012; mailed Nov. 1, 2012; 18 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012; mailed Aug. 2, 2012; 7 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 13/372,408, filed Feb. 13, 2012; 34 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak, Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, mailed Sep. 11, 2013, 1 pg. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, mailed Dec. 13, 2012; 39 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, mailed Mar. 21, 2013, 22 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, mailed Jul. 9, 2013, 21 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances for U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,954, filed Aug. 21, 2012, 35 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E., Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Jul. 31, 2013; 57 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Feb. 20, 2014; 29 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/784,300, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Sep. 24, 2013; 37 pgs. |
| Vonroll Hydro—Hydrojournal, pp. 1-16, May 2008. |
| English Translation: Vonroll Hydro—Hyrdojournal, Technology with a Future for Shut-off Systems—p. 4, VonRoll Hydro (shop) GmbH—New Concepts for Apprentice Training—p. 12, May 2008. |
| Von Roll Hydro—Hydrojournal, pp. 1-16, Nov. 2008. |
| English Translation: Von Roll Hydro—Hyrdojournal,VonRoll Hydroalert—Provides a Warning in the Event of Any Tampering with the Water Supply, p. 3, Nov. 2008. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Examiner Interview Summary Record for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed Feb. 5, 2008; 2 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed Oct. 26, 2007; 35 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Requirement for Restriction/ Election for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed Feb. 27, 2006; 17 pages. |
| Keyghobad,Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; 40 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed May 18, 2006; 13 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection or U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed Jun. 6, 2007; 32 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Certificate of Correction for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed Mar. 31, 2009; 1 page. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/298,300, filed Nov. 18, 2002; mailed Jul. 14, 2008; 4 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452, filed Oct. 1, 2008; mailed Mar. 22, 2010; 8 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Examiner Interview Summary Record for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452, filed Oct. 1, 2008; mailed Dec. 7, 2009; 3 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452, filed Oct. 1, 2008; mailed Sep. 14, 2009; 12 pages. |
| Keyghobad,Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452, filed Oct. 1, 2008; mailed May 1, 2009; 5 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliancesl under U.S. Appl. No. 12/243,452, filed Oct. 1, 2008; 33 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Jul. 19, 2010; 8 pages. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Jun. 28, 2010; 10 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Method and Apparatus for Inexpensively Monitoring and Controlling Remotely Distributed Appliances under U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,925, filed Jun. 24, 2009; 33 pgs. |
| Keyghobad, Seyamak; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957, filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Jun. 24, 2010; 10 pgs. |
| Keyghobad,Seyamak; Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/490,957, filed Jun. 24, 2009; mailed Dec. 23, 2009; 17 pgs. |
| Young et al. “Real-Time Intranet-Controlled Virtual Instrument Multiple-Circuit Power Monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Jun. 2000. vol. 49, No. 3, p. 570. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp? |
| De Almeida et al. “Advanced Monitoring Technologies for the Evaluation of Demand-Side Management Programs,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Aug. 1994. vol. 9, No. 3. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp?arnumber=336086. |
| Dolezilek. “Microprocessor Based Relay Information Improves the Power System,” Rural Electric Power Conference, May 1999. p. B5/1-B5/9. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs—all.jsp?arnumber=768685. |
| Gehami et al. “Electronic Control System I Salient Feature in Substation,” Transmission & Distrubition, Mar. 1991. vol. 43, No. 3, p. 48. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011—ProQuest]. |
| Horlent. “New Metering and Reading Techniques Based on a Modular Design Concept,” 10th International Conference on Electricity Distribution, May 1989. vol. 5, p. 455-459. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011—IEEExplore]. |
| “In Brief,” Land Mobile Radio News, Jan. 16, 1998. vol. 52, No. 3, p. 1. [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011—ProQuest] http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=25435781&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=31810&RQT=309&VName%20=PQD. |
| “Landis & Gyr Utilities: Service Partnership Helps Utilities Use Available Resources More Effectively,” www.landisgyr.com/utilities/e/fr—press1—e.htm (archived Feb. 6, 1998) http://web.archive.org/web/19980206060801/http://www.landisgyr.com/utilities. |
| Tamarkin. “Automated Meter Reading”, Sep.-Oct. 1992, vol. 50, No. 5/ [Accessed Dec. 29, 2011] http://www.uscicorp.com/news/Automatic—Power—reading.pdf. |
| ANSI; “Protocol Specification for ANSI Type 2 Optical Port”, American National Standard, ANSI C.Dec. 18, 2006, 11 pgs. |
| Federal Communications Commission; “Understanding the FCC Regulations for Low-Power, Non-Licensed Transmitters”, Office of Engineering and Technology; Oct. 1993; 34 pgs. |
| SEMTECH; “TN1200.4, Calculating Radiated Power and Field Strength for Conducted Power Measurements”, Semtech Corporation, Camarillo, CA, 2007, 9 pgs. |
| RFM; “HX 2000 Datasheet: 916.5 MHz: Hybrid Transmitter”, RF Monolithics, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA, 1998; 2 pgs. |
| General Electric; “GEH-5081 kV Meter Product Manual”, Nov. 1997, 137 pgs. |
| General Electric; “kV RSX—RS232/RS485 Communications Options: Instructions Manual”; Mar. 1999, 33 pgs. |
| Orfield; “Badger® Orion® System Helps Lemmon, South Dakota Reduce Read Time, Billing Cycles”, Badger Connect Publication, 2004, 2 pgs. |
| AMCO; “Pit Water-Meter Transponder (PWT)”; AMCO Automated Systems, LLC; PDB-14611; Sep. 2002; 2 pgs. |
| AMCO; “Short-Range Programmer (SRP) VRT”; AMCO Automated Systems, LLC; PDB-14555.1; Sep. 2002; 2 pgs. |
| AMCO; Remote Water-Meter Transponder (RWT); AMCO Automated Systems, LLC; PDB-14610; Sep. 2002; 2 pgs. |
| Article entitled: “Remote Meter Reading”, http://www.meter.co.uk/RMR.html; accessed on Jul. 30, 2012, 2 pgs. |
| Article entitled: “Datamatic, Badger Connect for AMR Solutions”, http://www.datamatic.com/badger—partnership.html; accessed on Jul. 27, 2012, 1 pg. |
| Article entitled: “OET Exhibits List”, https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application—id=194044&fcc—id=; 2 pgs. |
| Patterson, Tim; Request for Ex Parte Reexamination under U.S. Appl. No. 90/012,468, filed Sep. 6, 2012; 52 pgs. |
| Patterson, Tim; Request for Ex Parte Reexamination under U.S. Appl. No. 90/012,449, filed Aug. 23, 2012; 51 pgs. |
| Radix Corporation; “Automatic Meter Reading”, 2 pgs. |
| Transparent Techcnologies; “Model M1A: Utility Radio Transmitter; M1A Operating Instructions”; 7 pgs. |
| Trace; “Pit Water—Meter Transponder”; User Guide; Jan. 2003 16 pgs. |
| Hyland; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems and Methods under U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011; 28 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Jun. 5, 2014, 29 pgs. |
| Antenna. Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2014 [retrieved on Jun. 1, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/antenna>. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Sep. 11, 2014, 11 pgs. |
| Hyland; PCT Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method having serial No. PCT/US09/62247, filed Oct. 27, 2009, 30 pgs. |
| Hyland; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US2009/062247, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed May 3, 2011, 7 pgs. |
| International Search Report for serial No. PCT/US2009/062247, filed on Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Dec. 18, 2009, 2 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory;Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/004330, filed Apr. 25, 2011, mailed Mar. 21, 2013, 7 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/004330, filed Apr. 25, 2011, mailed Jul. 18, 2013, 6 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/004330, filed Apr. 25, 2011, mailed Oct. 3, 2013, 6 pgs. |
| Hyland; European Search Report for serial No. EP09824079.9, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed May 8, 2012; 38 pages. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Australian Patent Examination Report for serial No. 2009308949, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Nov. 12, 2013, 3 pgs. |
| Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2011-533427, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Apr. 30, 2013, 15 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2011-533427, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Feb. 4, 2014, 50 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Decision of Rejection for Japanese serial No. 2011-533427, filed Oct. 27, 2009, mailed Sep. 16, 2014, 4 pgs. |
| Hyland; PCT Appplication entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods having serial No. PCT/US2010/035666, filed May 20, 2010; 31 pgs. |
| Hyland; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US2010/035666, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Jul. 16, 2010, 7 pgs. |
| Hyland; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US2010/035666, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Nov. 22, 2011, 6 pgs. |
| Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/A/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Oct. 8, 2012, 3 pgs. |
| Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, mailed May 9, 2013, 8 pgs. |
| Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/A/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Sep. 3, 2013, 10 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Final Office Action for serial No. MX/A/2011/012383, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Jan. 9, 2014, 9 pgs. |
| European Search Report for serial No. EP2433440, filed Nov. 18, 2011, mailed Nov. 21, 2012, 6 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination report for serial No. 2010249499, filed Nov. 17, 2011, mailed Jun. 16, 2014, 5 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Decision of Rejection for Japanese serial No. 2012-512048, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Apr. 22, 2014, 10 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/015236, filed Dec. 19, 2012, mailed Jun. 13, 2013, 4 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/015236, filed Dec. 19, 2012, mailed Oct. 3, 2013, 8 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/015236, filed Dec. 19, 2012, mailed Dec. 3, 2013, received by foreign associate on Jan. 9, 2014, 4 pgs. |
| Hyland; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US2011/035374, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Sep. 13, 2011; 7 pgs. |
| Hyland; PCT Application Entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods having serial No. PCT/US11/35374, filed May 5, 2011, 28 pgs. |
| Hyland; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US2011/035374, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Dec. 19, 2012; 5 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination Report for serial No. 2011265675, filed Jan. 21, 2012, mailed Oct. 1, 2014, 3 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2013515338, filed Jan. 30, 2012, mailed Jun. 10, 2014, 8 pgs. |
| Hyland; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Water Supply Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method, having U.S. Appl. No. 61/108,770, filed Oct. 27, 2008, 11 pgs. |
| Hyland; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Water Supply Infrastructure Monitoring System and Method, having U.S. Appl. No. 61/180,600, filed May 22, 2009, 14 pgs. |
| Hyland; U.S. Provisional Patent Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods, having U.S. Appl. No. 61/355,468, filed Jun. 16, 2010; 31 pgs. |
| Splitz, David. E.; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Systems and Methods for Time-Based Hailing of Radio Frequency Devices assigned U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, 51 pages. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, mailed Jun. 18, 2013, 67 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, mailed Oct. 9, 2013, 16 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/283,526, filed Oct. 27, 2011, mailed Feb. 5, 2014, 1 pg. |
| Splitz, David E.; U.S. Patent Application Entitled: Systems and Methods for Dynamic Squelching in Radio Frequency Devices assigned U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011; 50 pgs. |
| (Splitz, David Edwin; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, mailed Sep. 16, 2013, 57 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, mailed Mar. 5, 2014, 18 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, mailed May 23, 2014, 41 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/339,655, filed Dec. 29, 2011, mailed Sep. 17, 2014, 1 pg. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Systems and Methods for Recovering an Out-Of-Service Node in a Hierarchical Network, U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,081, filed Sep. 18, 2014, 51 pgs. |
| Splitz, David; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US11/58260, filed Oct. 28, 2011, mailed Feb. 7, 2012, 8 pgs. |
| Splitz, David; PCT Application entitled: Systems and Methods for Time-Based Flailing of Radio Frequency having serial No. PCT/US11/058260, filed Oct. 28, 2011, 51 pgs. |
| Splitz, David; International Preliminary Report on Patentability for serial No. PCT/US11/58260, filed Oct. 28, 2011, mailed May 8, 2014, 7 pgs. |
| Splitz, David; International Search Report and Written Opinion for serial No. PCT/US12/22060, filed Jan. 20, 2012, mailed Mar. 29, 2012, 8 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory; Japanese Office Action for serial No. 2012-512048, filed May 20, 2010, mailed Oct. 22, 2013, 51 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Issue Notification for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Dec. 23, 2014, 1 pg. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Supplemental Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 13/101,235, filed May 5, 2011, mailed Nov. 25, 2014, 5 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Infrastructure Monitoring Devices, Systems, and Methods having U.S. Appl. No. 14/557,754, filed Dec. 2, 2014, 28 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Australian Patent Examination report for serial No. 2010249499, filed Nov. 17, 2011, mailed Nov. 21, 2014, 5 pgs. |
| Cullinan, Thomas; U.S. Patent Application entitled: SMS Communication for Cellular Node, having U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,986, filed Apr. 14, 2016, 26 pgs. |
| Grady, Robert Henry; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Time Beacons having U.S. Appl. No. 15/065,423, filed Mar. 9, 2016, 34 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Asymmetrical Hail Timing, having U.S. Appl. No. 15/206,851, filed Jul. 11, 2016, 33 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; U.S. Patent Application entitled: Node Migration, having U.S. Appl. No. 15/161,448, filed May 23, 2016, 30 pgs. |
| Ball, Marty Scott; Non-Final Office Action for US. Appl. No. 14/451,896; filed Aug. 5, 2014, mailed May 12, 2016; 15 pages. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/557,754, filed Dec. 2, 2014, mailed Mar. 30, 2016, 24 pgs. |
| Hyland, Gregory E.; Mexico Office Action for serial No. MX/a/2012/000347, filed May 5, 2011, mailed May 30, 2016, 4 pgs. |
| McCraven, Jeremy; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/273,823, filed May 9, 2014, mailed Jul. 7, 2016, 10 pgs. |
| Splitz, David Edwin; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,081, filed Sep. 18, 2014; mailed Sep. 29, 2016; 34 pgs. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160066249 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |