This invention relates in general to network diagnostics, and more particularly to a network administration system for automatically activating dynamic rule sets in response to satisfying the criteria of existing static rule sets of error logs in a network.
It is well known in traditional computer and digital communication networks for technicians to respond to the generation of error logs by notifying affected users of system problems, analyzing and then fixing the problems using an assortment of software commands and/or tools. The use of such software commands is often repetitive and requires the technician to manually enter the commands upon each observation of a specific log. Thousands of logs can be generated by a single problem. For example, if a T1 line goes down, error logs could be generated by thousands of phones that cannot find a dial tone.
Therefore, according to the prior art, automatic filtering of error logs has been effected through the use of “rule sets” to determine if a combination of logs satisfies a given criteria. One example of such an automated process is a product from Plexis (http://www.triadhc.com/edi.shtml) called Plexis EDI Toolkit. If the criteria is satisfied, it is known in the art either to generate a further log or to provide an overall summary for describing the problem to the technician. Thus, it is known to generate Higher Level Logs (HLL) from Lower Level Logs (LLL) in response to predetermined rule sets being satisfied. The Lower Level Logs (LLL) are generated by network applications or devices. Such systems are valuable because the HLLs help to explain to the system administrator/designer what is really going on in the system.
There are instances where HLL's generate more HLL logs, or combinations of LLL's and HLL's generate new HLL's. According to the prior art, these rule sets are either manually applied by the technician as required, which can be a time consuming and complicated task where many logs have been generated, or the rule sets remain activated at all times, in which case analysis of the logs becomes time consuming since many rule sets need to be examined.
According to the present invention, a network administration system is provided for automatically activating and deactivating dynamic rule sets when specified static rule sets have been satisfied. The static rule sets whose criteria have been satisfied by the generation of predetermined error logs trigger activation or deactivation of the dynamic rule sets. The automatic activation and deactivation of dynamic rule sets alleviates time consuming manual application of rule sets. The causal activation and deactivation of the dynamic rule sets only when other rule set criteria have been satisfied reduces the number of rule sets when compared to the prior art approach of activating all rule sets at all times.
The system of the present invention may advantageously be applied to any application that generates logs and is monitored by rule sets, to allow dynamic variations in monitoring when different problems arise, and to set explicit instructions for specific circumstances of logs.
A detailed description of the preferred embodiment is set forth herein below with reference to the following drawings, in which:
As indicated above,
According to the invention, a network administration system is provided for programming the activation and deactivation of dynamic rule sets in response to network conditions. Thus, with reference to
The activation and deactivation of rule sets is triggered by using software tools (e.g. Visual Basic, C++) to read and compare the logs to active rule sets, as shown in
Exemplary pseudo-code of the process for implementing the network administration system of the present invention is as follows:
Alternatives and modifications of the invention are possible within the sphere and scope as set forth in the claims appended hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0008952.4 | Apr 2000 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5367609 | Hopper et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5384892 | Strong | Jan 1995 | A |
5872931 | Chivaluri | Feb 1999 | A |
6208720 | Curtis et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6493755 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0650302 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0909075 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0910197 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0938076 | Aug 1999 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020010912 A1 | Jan 2002 | US |