The presently disclosed inventions relate generally to medical imaging techniques such as tomosynthesis, and more specifically to systems and methods for implementing a dynamic self-learning medical image network system. In particular, the presently disclosed inventions relate to interacting with, and observing user behavior pertaining to, one or more medical images at a plurality of nodes, in order to improve performance of the dynamic self-learning medical image network system.
Medical imaging systems, e.g., tomosynthesis systems, CT scanning systems, MRI systems, mammography systems, etc., have been used for screening and diagnosing a variety of conditions. Doctors and other medical professionals often rely on medical images to diagnose various health conditions. Accurate readings of the medical images are contingent on the quality and clarity of the image, as well as the knowledge and expertise of the medical professional reviewing the image. Specifically, in order for the medical images to be helpful to medical professionals, they must clearly and accurately portray respective body parts to which the image pertains, such that the medical professional can efficiently make a prognosis with reasonable certainty. Radiologists (or other medical professionals) typically study thousands of such medical images, and are trained to detect, through time and practice, recurring patterns in the medical images that are indicative of abnormalities (or other objects of interest) in human tissue.
However, even with extensive training, the objects of interest to the medical professional can be difficult to identify within the medical image for a number of reasons. For example, the medical image may not provide sufficient clarity, or focus, such that a potential abnormality is overlooked. Or, the abnormality may be too small, or otherwise difficult to ascertain. In another example, the abnormality may not be a well-known abnormality, or one that a newly-trained medical professional has previously encountered. In some cases, human error may result in certain abnormalities being overlooked or misdiagnosed. Furthermore, the experience and knowledge from highly experienced practitioners is not easily transferred to others. As will be appreciated, such errors and omissions may have serious, and sometimes even fatal, consequences for patients. Also, existing medical imaging analysis systems, including in particular Computer Aided Detection (CAD) systems, must be frequently programmed and modeled with new information and/or updated analysis techniques, which is time consuming and resource-intensive. Thus, a medical imaging analysis system that minimizes reviewing errors and is automatically updated to provide the latest information and analysis techniques would be highly desirable.
In accordance with one aspect of the disclosed inventions, a method is provided for creating and using a dynamic self-learning medical image network system. In an exemplary embodiment, the method includes receiving, from a first node initial user interaction data pertaining to one or more user interactions with the one or more initially obtained medical images; training a deep learning algorithm based at least in part on the initial user interaction data received from the node; and transmitting an instance of the trained deep learning algorithm to the first node and/or to one or more additional nodes, wherein at each respective node to which the instance of the trained deep learning algorithm is transmitted, the trained deep learning algorithm is applied to respective one or more subsequently obtained medical images in order to obtain a result.
By way of non-limiting examples, the initial user interaction data may include at least one annotation on at least one of the one or more initially obtained medical images, a selection of one of more pixels associated with at least one of the one or more initially obtained medical images, an actual or estimated amount of time one or more users spent viewing one or more of the initially obtained medical images, an actual or estimated portion of at least one of the one or more medical images that was focused upon by at least one user, a description of a patient condition, and/or diagnostic findings that may be (without limitation) in a form of a written or a voice dictation report.
By way of non-limiting examples, the instance of the trained deep learning algorithm may be maintained at the first node and/or one or more additional nodes, and/or may run on a server accessed through a network.
By way of non-limiting examples, the result may include recognizing one or more objects in the medical image and/or providing a recommendation pertaining to the medical image.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method further includes receiving, from the first node and/or one or more additional nodes, subsequent user interaction data pertaining to one or more subsequently obtained medical images, wherein the subsequent user interaction data is used to modify the trained deep learning algorithm. By way of non-limiting example, the subsequent user interaction data may be used to modify the trained deep learning algorithm if it is determined that the subsequent user interaction data satisfies a predetermined threshold confidence level indicating that the trained deep learning algorithm should be modified. By way of non-limiting example, modification of the trained deep learning algorithm may include adding one or more layers to and/or changing the internal structure of, the layers in the trained deep learning algorithm.
In accordance with another aspect of the disclosed inventions, a dynamic self-learning medical image network system is provided, the system including a plurality of nodes, and a central brain server, wherein the central brain server is configured to receive initial user interaction data from one or more nodes of the plurality, wherein the initial user interaction data pertains to one or more user interactions with one or more initially obtained medical images, train a deep learning algorithm based at least in part on the initial user interaction data received from the node, and transmit an instance of the trained deep learning algorithm to each node of the plurality, and wherein each node of the plurality is configured to apply the instance of the trained deep learning algorithm to one or more subsequently obtained medical images in order to obtain a result.
In an exemplary embodiment, each node of the plurality is configured to maintain an instance of the trained deep learning algorithm.
By way of non-limiting examples, the initial user interaction data received by the central brain server may include at least one annotation on at least one of the one or more initially obtained medical images, a selection of one of more pixels associated with at least one of the one or more initially obtained medical images, an actual or estimated amount of time one or more users spent viewing one or more of the initially obtained medical images, an actual or estimated portion of at least one of the one or more medical images that was focused upon by at least one user at one of the nodes, a description of a patient condition, and/or diagnostic findings that may be (without limitation) in a form of a written or a voice dictation report.
By way of non-limiting examples, the result may include recognizing one or more objects in the medical image and/or providing a recommendation pertaining to the medical image.
In an exemplary embodiment, the central brain server is configured to receive subsequent user interaction data from one or more nodes of the plurality pertaining to one or more subsequently obtained medical images, and to modify the trained deep learning algorithm if the subsequent user interaction data satisfies a predetermined threshold confidence level indicating that the trained deep learning algorithm should be modified. By way of non-limiting example, central brain server may modify the trained deep learning algorithm by adding one or more layers to the trained deep learning algorithm.
These and other aspects and embodiments of the disclosed inventions are described in more detail below, in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
The drawings illustrate the design and utility of embodiments of the disclosed inventions, in which similar elements are referred to by common reference numerals. These drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. In order to better appreciate how the above-recited and other advantages and objects are obtained, a more particular description of the embodiments will be rendered, which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. These drawings depict only typical embodiments of the disclosed inventions and are not therefore to be considered limiting of its scope.
All numeric values are herein assumed to be modified by the terms “about” or “approximately,” whether or not explicitly indicated, wherein the terms “about” and “approximately” generally refer to a range of numbers that one of skill in the art would consider equivalent to the recited value (i.e., having the same function or result). In some instances, the terms “about” and “approximately” may include numbers that are rounded to the nearest significant figure. The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers within that range (e.g., 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 3.80, 4, and 5).
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. In describing the depicted embodiments of the disclosed inventions illustrated in the accompanying figures, specific terminology is employed in this patent specification for the sake of clarity and ease of description. However, the disclosure of this specification is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected, and it is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner. It is to be further understood that the various elements and/or features of different illustrative embodiments may be combined with each other and/or substituted for each other wherever possible within the scope of this specification, including without limitation the accompanying figures and the appended claims.
Various embodiments of the disclosed inventions are described hereinafter with reference to the figures. It should be noted that the figures are not drawn to scale and that elements of similar structures or functions are represented by like reference numerals throughout the figures. It should also be noted that the figures are only intended to facilitate the description of the embodiments. They are not intended as an exhaustive description of the invention or as a limitation on the scope of the disclosed inventions, which is defined only by the appended claims and their equivalents. In addition, an illustrated embodiment of the disclosed inventions needs not have all the aspects or advantages shown. For example, an aspect or an advantage described in conjunction with a particular embodiment of the disclosed inventions is not necessarily limited to that embodiment and can be practiced in any other embodiments even if not so illustrated.
Introduction
This patent specification and the accompanying figures describe and illustrate a dynamic self-learning medical image network system that utilizes deep learning techniques to observe user interactions with medical images at a plurality of nodes. These user interactions are compiled, analyzed and optimized using a central brain network that advantageously trains one or more deep learning algorithms/network to continuously improve readings of medical images over time. As will be discussed throughout the specification, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system advantageously leverages expertise gained from users who are highly trained in reading medical images and decodes this information in deep learning algorithms, such that the system is constantly learning and improving analysis of medical images over time, in an effort to ultimate emulate the skill and intuition of a human expert.
Accurate reading of medical images, such as without limitation MRI scans, CT scans, tomosynthesis slices, X-rays, etc., is often contingent on the skill and technical expertise of medical personnel evaluating them. This expertise is gained through time, practice and intuition that is developed as a result of viewing a very large number of medical images. However, since there is a wide range in the respective skill, efficiency and expertise of the medical personnel charged with reading the images, the quality and accuracy of image-based screening and diagnosis can vary greatly. Further, even in the case of highly skilled medical professionals (e.g., radiologists), human error sometimes causes missed diagnoses, inaccurate readings and/or false positives. Of course, such errors, although easy to make, adversely affect the quality of healthcare delivered to patients, and can cause great stress and anxiety to everyone involved.
Although there are many medical image analysis software (CAD) programs available in the market today, they are static modeling programs that have to be programmed and trained prior to implementation, and as such can quickly become outdated. Re-programming to update the system is costly and time intensive, and still tends to lag behind research or new findings, even if routinely performed.
Advantages of the Dynamic Self-Learning Medical Image Network
One approach to globally improve the quality of medical image screening and diagnosis is to aid the reader of the medical images (also referred to herein as the system “user”) by implementing a dynamic self-learning medical imaging network system that interacts with a large number of users (e.g., expert radiologists), analyzes many types of medical data, e.g., medical images, patient information data, patient medical records, etc., and automatically learns to interpret medical images and data to identify patterns (which may be image patterns or non-image patterns) that are symptomatic of abnormalities.
A dynamic self-learning medical image network system may be defined as a system that is continuously updating and/or adding layers to one or more deep neural networks, without necessarily requiring manual re-programming. In other words, rather than relying (and waiting) on presumed (if not actual) experts that understand trends in radiology or image analysis to create a new static program or update an existing one, the dynamic self-learning system is continually learning from the actual (and truly expert) users, by analyzing the user interactions with the system and periodically adding layers to the deep neural networks based on this analysis. This approach has several advantages. First, by studying user interactions with a very large number of medical images, the accuracy of the system in detecting such patterns not only improves over time, but also contemporaneously with the user. For example, if users are beginning to identify a previously unknown mass as being an abnormality, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system obtains this information in real-time, and is able to start identifying such abnormalities on its own, without necessarily being re-programmed by a system administrator. Additionally, the system learns patterns not just from a limited training dataset, but from a very large, and indeed ever-growing dataset. For example, thousands of radiologists may mark a particular type of breast mass as a spiculated mass (e.g., a type of breast cancer lesion). Having digital data of these diagnoses allows the system to study the patterns of the images that have been marked by the users as constituting a spiculated mass. Thus, the dynamic self-learning system described and depicted herein may strategically leverage the expertise of tens (or hundreds) of thousands of users in real-time to develop a highly accurate image recognition system.
Further, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system described and depicted herein allows users to rely on the system (and other users) in reaching a diagnosis. For example, a particular doctor (or group of doctors) may have special expertise when dealing with a rare form of abnormality. Or the abnormality may have only been recently detected by a small group of users in a particular part of the world. By leveraging knowledge that may only be available in one local community, the dynamic self-learning system may assist users in other communities worldwide by automatically detecting the heretofore unknown or little-known condition. Thus, information may spread far more swiftly with such an integrated image recognition system that is connected to users having varying skills, expertise, geography and patient type.
Moreover, by tracking interactions of a large number of users, the dynamic self-learning system may learn that certain users are especially skilled or knowledgeable, e.g., based on the rate of accurate screenings, and interactions with such users may be weighted higher than the average user of the medical image system. Conversely, if it is determined that certain users are less skilled, the dynamic self-learning system may avoid or minimize learnings from such user interactions, but may instead assist such users with information gained from users that have greater expertise. Thus, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system may actively assist users in improving readings of medical images.
The dynamic self-learning medical image network system may be trained to observe a set of user interactions pertaining to one or more medical images, and pool data received from a plurality of users in order to learn aspects pertaining to medical image and user interface interaction. For example, one learning aspect may relate to image analysis itself, and the dynamic self-learning medical image network system may observe user behavior related to medical image to detect recurring patterns in medical images that are indicative of abnormalities. Another example of a learning aspect may relate to user experience, and how to improve a set of task flows such that a user is provided an optimal amount of information to quickly and efficiently reach a prognosis. Yet another example of a learning aspect may relate to learning medical history associated with a patient and presenting that information to the medical professional to provide a more comprehensive diagnosis.
Although the present specification focuses on learning aspects related to image analysis and diagnosis, it should be appreciated and understood that the dynamic self-learning medical image network system may observe a myriad of user interactions to improve various aspects of the system. By constantly learning through user interactions with medical images in many locations, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system detects (or aids medical professionals in detecting) abnormalities, thereby increasing the efficiency and accuracy of screening and diagnoses performed using medical images. Ultimately, by learning details pertaining to highly skilled user decisions regarding medical images (also referred to herein as “medical image process flow”), the dynamic self-learning medical image network system becomes increasingly accurate and reliable over time, such that it may attempt to emulate the skill (or indeed even the subconscious intuition) of such highly skilled users.
The present specification focuses on implementing a dynamic self-learning medical image network system using deep machine learning algorithms (e.g., neural networks) to learn from users and data. It is envisioned that the system may learn independently with little need for manual programming or programmer input. In particular, in recent years, there have been major improvements in the field of machine learning using deep learning systems to recognize images and to understand natural languages. In many applications, the machine learning algorithm can be trained to learn to perform tasks at similar performance levels as a human. By building upon such machine learning algorithms, an “expert-level” self-learning medical image network system may be created that can be used to extract patterns and detect trends that may be too complex to be detected through traditional computer technologies but easily detected by an expert human user. Thus, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system may become an “expert” assistant to the medical professional reading the medical image. Other suitable means to achieve such a complex learning may be similarly implemented without limitation.
System Overview (Including Interaction Between Various Nodes and the Central Brain)
Each node 102 may be implemented on a picture archiving and communications system (PACS). For example, a respective node 102 may be a dedicated medical image viewing workstation allowing users 110 to perform a variety of specialized image-related tasks. The nodes 102 may include one or more network interfaces for communicating with other devices through a network. The nodes 102 may include other input/output devices that enable user interaction with the node, such as a display, keyboard, mouse, audio speakers, and the like. It should be appreciated that the node may function with or without the user. For example, in some embodiments, the node 102 may be an intelligent workstation that mimics or attempts to make decisions like a human.
In some embodiments, a particular node 102 may represent an algorithm or data server that may be running data mining algorithms. In other embodiments, the node 102 may be a computing device that gathers data. In some embodiments, the node 102 may be a PACS machine that gathers images. In still other embodiments, the node 102 may simply be software that is running on a hospital computer system. Thus, it should be appreciated that not all nodes 102 necessarily interact with users, and some nodes 102 may simply gather data, or learn from data itself while other nodes 102 also provide and receive user interaction.
A user 110 accessing the dynamic self-learning medical image network system 100 is typically a medical professional (e.g., general doctor, radiologist, medical technician), but it should be appreciated that the dynamic self-learning medical image network system 100 is capable of interacting with any user (e.g., non-medical professionals, patients, etc.) no user at all. For purposes of illustration, the remainder of this specification focuses on medical professional users, but this should not be understood as limiting the applicability of the dynamic self-learning medical image network system.
The central brain network 104 may be any type of network known in the art, such as the Internet, or any cloud computing network. In one or more embodiments, the nodes 102 may communicatively couple to the central brain network in any manner, such as by a global or local wired or wireless connection (e.g., LAN, WAN, intranet, etc.). In one or more embodiments, the central brain network 104 may be communicatively coupled to one or more servers 150 or other machines which may include one or more processing units and/or computer readable media. In one or more embodiments, the central brain network 104 may reside (and be maintained) on one or more physical computing devices, or it may reside on a virtual cloud computing network. In its simplest form, it can be a very powerful central computing device communicatively coupled to a plurality of nodes. In a more complex form, the central brain network 104 may take a distributed form and reside over a number of physical or virtual computing devices.
More particularly, the server(s) 150 may house and/or host a plurality of computing components that together process data received from the plurality of nodes 102, store data, and provide outputs that are sent back to the nodes 102. As will be discussed in further detail below, the data may pertain to medical images being viewed and interacted with at the plurality of nodes 102. This data may be processed, analyzed, stored and updated through the various computing components of the server 150, and updated data may be sent back to the nodes 102 through the central brain network 104. In one or more embodiments, the server 150 may be a single powerful server. In another embodiment, a distributed system having multiple servers performing sub-sections of the computing tasks is envisioned. The server(s) 150 may be located in one geographical location, or may be located at different locations throughout the world. In one or more embodiments, an instance of the server 150 is operable to run at the node 102, such that an instance of the dynamic self-learning medical image network system runs on the node itself. The server(s) 150 may refer to local servers or remote servers.
In one or more embodiments, the server(s) 150 include one or more database(s) 106 that store all or portion of the data related to the dynamic self-learning medical image network system 100. The database(s) 106 may be the central data store providing long-term storage for all data, or it may be a limited-purpose data store for a specific area. The database(s) 106 make data accessible to the central brain network 104. The server(s) 150 may include computing components that are operable to retrieve data from the one or more databases and supply it to the central brain network 104 through a server-network interface. Although depicted as a single database 106 in
Medical images typically refer to digital representations of one or more objects (e.g., parts or portions of a patient's body, such as breasts). The digital representations may be modified or manipulated in order to identify or enhance certain features of the image. Such manipulations are virtual manipulations accomplished through the various computing components of the server(s) 150.
The analysis data may originate from the users or may be computer-generated analysis data. The database 106 may also store a set of user interaction data 152. The user interaction data 152 may be any data collected from the plurality of users 110. For example, the user interaction data 152 may be detected patterns indicative of known abnormalities, and also may contain feature values (e.g., coordinates, grayscale values, contrast values, etc.) related to abnormalities (e.g., cysts, tumors, abnormal masses, spiculated masses, calcifications, etc.). In one or more embodiments, the database(s) 106 include a constantly updated/modified learning library that improves over time based on the collected user interaction data. In one or more embodiments, the learning library may store a set of rules and/or models that may be used by the server(s) for image analysis.
In one or more embodiments, the server(s) 150 include one or more algorithms 112 that ingest a set of data pertaining to user interaction with a plurality of images, and create data models that may be used to detect patterns indicative of abnormalities in the medical images. The algorithms 112 may relate to image analysis, image display, or any other processes related to data that is present and interacted with at the nodes 102. Although the present specification focuses on image analysis algorithms, it should be appreciated that any type of algorithm 112 may be created and stored.
In one or more embodiments, the server(s) 150 include one or more deep learning algorithms or deep neural networks 114 that are trained on medical image data to learn complex image patterns and detect anatomical landmarks. A deep learning algorithm may refer to a deep neural network comprising various layers of information. Deep learning algorithms 114 contain multiple layers of learned features and/or variables between the input data and the output data. Deep learning algorithms 114 or deep neural networks may be implemented with many layers that are built on top of each other, such that complex deep learning algorithms comprise several deep layers, e.g., tens, hundreds, or even thousands of layers, that are continuously added as the system learns more information. A deep neural network may be differentiated with typical neural networks that tend to be “shallow” neural networks comprising only a few layers, e.g., only three or four layers. Thus, deep neural networks tend to be far more complex than shallow neural networks.
The deep learning algorithms 114 may be trained to detect patterns or a localization (e.g., pixel or voxel coordinates) in a medical image. In one or more embodiments, deep learning algorithms may be trained based on a plurality of training images. For example, the deep learning algorithms 114 may be trained using the user interaction data stored in the database(s) 106. The training images may be 2D or 3D medical images acquired through any type of medical image modality (e.g., tomosynthesis, mammography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, etc.). It should be appreciated that at least a subset of the training images may be annotated with the location of the respective anatomical object or landmark. For example, the user interaction data stored in the database(s) 106 may contain annotations (collected from the plurality of users 110) in the medical images identifying a desired object (e.g., type of mass, abnormality, type of tissue, etc.).
In some embodiments, the training images may be non-annotated but may tag objects in some other fashion. The deep learning algorithms 114 adapt and modify over time so as to improve their accuracy, efficiency and/or other performance criteria with a larger and larger number of user interaction data, thereby detecting and localizing desired anatomical landmarks or objects in the medical images with greater precision. Although there may be many possible implementations of deep learning algorithms to recognize abnormalities in medical images, one possible implementation approach includes one or more deep learning algorithms that calculate a probability that a targeted anatomical object is located at a particular pixel or voxel. In another possible implementation, the deep learning algorithms may calculate a difference vector from a particular voxel to a predicted location of the target object.
Thus, deep learning algorithms 114 may be utilized in one of many possible implementations and be trained, using user interaction data, to detect target objects or abnormalities in the medical images. By collecting vast amounts of user interaction data, the deep learning algorithms may be trained to become increasingly precise over time. It should be appreciated that that the deep neural networks or deep learning algorithms are updated dynamically, in contrast to static neural networks that are used to provide results based on a pre-programmed algorithm. Static neural networks do not adapt to new information, whereas the deep neural network system described and depicted herein “learns” from various user interactions, and updates, modifies and/or adds layers to the deep learning neural network(s). The term “dynamic,” in this context, refers to a deep-learning system that is continually updated or modified automatically without specific need for re-programming. In particular, the deep neural network system preferably automatically updates the respective deep neural networks by adding one or more layers and/or changing the structure of one or more existing layers, once it is understood by the system that additional complexity pertaining to a pattern is required or otherwise useful. This is an important distinction from existing deep neural network algorithms, which (once trained) merely modify the respective layer weighting parameters without otherwise changing or adding layers.
There may be many ways in which to add layers to the deep neural network and/or update the deep neural network contemporaneously while a plurality of users interacts with the system. For example, the system might pool together data from a large number of users to determine a threshold level of confidence before adding a layer of complexity to the existing deep learning algorithm. The threshold levels may be predetermined, in one or more embodiment. Or, in another embodiment, the threshold level may refer to a particular number of users corroborating a particular detail. In yet another embodiment, programmer input may be requested prior to adding another layer. Once a particular confidence level is achieved, one or more layers may be added, or the neural network may be modified to conform to the newly “learned” data.
Example Implementation of Dynamic Self-Learning Medical Image Network System
Referring now to
At 214, the user may interact with the medical image (e.g., annotate the medical image, zoom into particular aspects of the medical image, focus on a particular slice if there are multiple slices, etc.) in one or more ways. For example, in viewing a particular tomosynthesis slice, the user may mark a particular set of pixels of the image and annotate that part of the image as indicative of a spiculated mass lesion. This user interaction may be recorded at the node 102a. The various types of possible user interactions will be discussed further below. Or, the user 110a may concur or reject the analysis provided by the deep learning algorithm. User interactions are collected in addition to the provided analysis such that the dynamic self-learning image network system is constantly collecting user interaction information even if a current instance of the (initially trained) deep-learning algorithm is run on one or more medical images.
At 216, the user interaction data recorded at the node 102a (e.g., annotations, marked pixels, audio and/or video recordings, etc.) may be sent to the central brain network 104. At 218, the user interaction data (input) is received at the server 15 through the central brain network 104. In one or more embodiments, the user interaction data may be used as additional training data on the deep learning algorithms 114. As discussed above, the deep learning algorithms 114 may consume the user interaction data to learn patterns or features associated with a spiculated mass as highlighted by the user. This interaction (along with other user interaction data collected from all the other nodes of the dynamic self-learning medical image network system) allows the deep learning algorithms 114 to automatically recognize spiculated masses (and other abnormalities learned by the deep learning algorithms 114) based on digital information associated with the medical image. The modified (improved) deep learning algorithm information may be stored at one or more databases at the server 150.
In practice, not every new user interaction data will be used (or be useful) to modify (with the goal of improving) an existing deep learning algorithm. The example discussed above is simplified for illustrative purposes. Rather, the newly collected user interaction data may be used to run one or more data-mining/un-supervised learning algorithm to form a new understanding of the complexity of the new data. Once this complexity reaches a certain threshold level, more layers may be added to the deep learning algorithm to create an improved/updated deep learning algorithm that is more complex and contains insights from more data. The improved/updated deep learning algorithm may be further trained on more preliminary/training data before it is pushed back to various nodes of the dynamic self-learning medical image network system.
At 220, the improved/updated deep learning algorithms are communicated to the various nodes through the central brain network 104. At 222, an instance (or partial instance) of the improved/updated trained deep learning algorithms may be transmitted to any node (e.g., 102b), which may then be used to provide feedback and/or provide image analysis at the node 102b. The improved/updated trained deep learning algorithms may run on the node 102b in order to automatically recognize spiculated masses (or other abnormalities) found in other medical images residing at the node 102b. For example, this improved/updated deep learning algorithm information may be used on another medical image viewed by a user at node 102b. The node 102b (leveraging the improved deep learning algorithms) may automatically mark portions of the other medical image if the system determines that a particular area of the medical image contains a spiculated mass object. This information may be displayed to the user at node 102b, wherein the user may confirm or reject the automatically detected object. This interaction may also be recorded and sent back to the server 150 through the central brain network 104 to further improve the deep learning algorithms 114. Thus, it is envisioned that the deep learning algorithms becomes increasingly skilled at recognizing objects found in the medical images over time.
As discussed above, user interaction data collected at the various nodes 102 of the dynamic self-learning medical image network system 100 is continuously used, in regular intervals, to improve the deep learning algorithms 114. Thus, the current invention(s) describe a dynamic self-learning medical image network system that is constantly learning in real-time as it is being deployed at various nodes. In contrast to static neural networks that have to be manually programmed or re-programmed periodically, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system is continuously adding more layers (or otherwise modifying itself) to the deep learning algorithms without necessitating reprogramming to create a new neural network. When new data is learned that adds to the complexity of the existing deep learning algorithms, new layers are automatically added to the deep learning algorithm, and pushed to the various nodes.
Referring now to
In one or more embodiments, the user 110a may immediately focus one or more of the image slices 302 to focus on. For example, the user 110a may spend most of the time focused on image slice x. The dynamic self-learning medical image network system 100 may record this interaction to determine whether there are any patterns in what image slice(s) provide the most valuable information. In one or more embodiments, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system 100 may track the actual time and/or an estimate of an amount of time spent on a particular image or images (slice or slices). This information may be coupled with other collected user interaction data to learn what parts of an image deck are most important when analyzing images.
In another example, the dynamic self-learning medical image network system may ask the user 110a to mark or otherwise annotate a particular image with information regarding the medical image. In one possible implementation, a set of users may be selected to train the dynamic self-learning system. These users may be asked to annotate various medical images with many types of abnormalities. The system may thereafter pool images belonging to or associated with a type of abnormality, and then identify (“learn”) patterns emerging from a relatively large image dataset.
Other types of user interactions that may be recorded include pixels of the medical image that may be highlighted or zoomed by the user. The dynamic self-learning medical image network system may record the time spent on an image or set of images. Similarly, any number of such interactions may be received and recorded.
Any or all of these user interactions 304 may be sent to the server 150 through the central brain network 104, and further stored in the learning database 106. The learning database 106 may comprise user interaction data 152 received from thousands or millions of nodes. As shown in
Furthermore, the learning database 106 may store information related to known digital patterns indicative of objects in the image. For example, the learning database 106 may store patterns indicative of various abnormal (and normal) objects found in the breast. The database 106 may also store a set of basic training data (e.g., known abnormalities, etc.) to be used to train the deep learning algorithms. Of course, by utilizing more and more training data, the deep learning algorithms become more accurate over time. By pooling together medical image data (image or non-image based data) deep learning algorithms and other types of machine learning algorithms may be utilized to learn data patterns that can be used to not only detect and localize abnormalities, but also to understand normal variations among different individuals and populations.
At step 412, the user interaction data may be sent from the node 102a to the server 150 through the central brain network 104. At step 414, the new user interaction data may be pooled with other user interpretation data related to a particular part of the deep learning algorithm. For example, the user interaction may pertain to a particular type of object being displayed at various nodes to various users. For example, a particular feature of an abnormal object may be specified through the user interaction. Each of these user interactions regarding the feature may be compiled together to determine whether users are identifying a particular feature, or else classifying it in a manner that is not presently encoded in the existing deep neural network or algorithm.
At step 416 it may be determined whether the pooled user interpretations satisfy a threshold level such that a modification to the preliminary deep learning algorithm is required. For example, the deep learning algorithm may only be modified, e.g., add a layer to the deep neural network, change a value, etc., if a predetermined threshold level is met. For example, to add a layer to the deep neural network, a confidence level, e.g., based on number of users providing the particular input, weight given to users, etc., of 98% may need to be met. Or, in another example, to change an existing value, a confidence level of 99.9% may need to be met.
At step 418, if the predetermined threshold level is not met, the system continues to use the preliminary deep learning algorithm. If, however, it is determined at step 416 that the threshold level is met, the deep learning algorithm may be modified (e.g., a new layer may be added). At step 422, the modified deep learning algorithm may be pushed to various nodes, and the modified deep learning algorithm may be applied to various images at the nodes (step 424).
It should be appreciated that in some embodiments, when the neural network is modified, it may need to be trained at the server with training data prior to pushing the algorithm to the various nodes. Thus, the above example is provided for illustrative purposes and should not be read as limiting.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
As shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
Finally, referring to
Having described exemplary embodiments of the dynamic self-learning medical image network system, it should be appreciated that the examples provided herein and depicted in the accompanying figures are only illustrative, and that other embodiments and examples also are encompassed within the scope of the appended claims. For example, while the flow diagrams provided in the accompanying figures are illustrative of exemplary steps; the overall image merge process may be achieved in a variety of manners using other data merge methods known in the art. The system block diagrams are similarly representative only, illustrating functional delineations that are not to be viewed as limiting requirements of the disclosed inventions. It will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made to the depicted and/or described embodiments, without departing from the scope of the disclosed inventions, which is to be defined only by the following claims and their equivalents. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
The present application is a National Phase entry under 35 U.S.C § 371 of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/035331, having an international filing date of May 31, 2018, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/522,241, filed Jun. 20, 2017, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety into the present application.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2018/035331 | 5/31/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/236565 | 12/27/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3502878 | Stewart | Mar 1970 | A |
3863073 | Wagner | Jan 1975 | A |
3971950 | Evans et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4160906 | Daniels | Jul 1979 | A |
4310766 | Finkenzeller et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4496557 | Malen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4559641 | Caugant et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4706269 | Reina et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4744099 | Huettenrauch | May 1988 | A |
4773086 | Fujita | Sep 1988 | A |
4773087 | Plewes | Sep 1988 | A |
4819258 | Kleinman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821727 | Levene et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4907156 | Doi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4969174 | Schied | Nov 1990 | A |
4989227 | Tirelli et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5018176 | Romeas et al. | May 1991 | A |
RE33634 | Yanaki | Jul 1991 | E |
5029193 | Saffer | Jul 1991 | A |
5051904 | Griffith | Sep 1991 | A |
5078142 | Siczek et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5099846 | Hardy | Mar 1992 | A |
5129911 | Siczek et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5133020 | Giger et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5163075 | Lubinsky | Nov 1992 | A |
5164976 | Scheid et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5199056 | Darrah | Mar 1993 | A |
5219351 | Teubner | Jun 1993 | A |
5240011 | Assa | Aug 1993 | A |
5279309 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280427 | Magnusson | Jan 1994 | A |
5289520 | Pellegrino et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5343390 | Doi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5359637 | Webbe | Oct 1994 | A |
5365562 | Toker | Nov 1994 | A |
5386447 | Siczek | Jan 1995 | A |
5415169 | Siczek et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426685 | Pellegrino et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5452367 | Bick | Sep 1995 | A |
5491627 | Zhang et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5499097 | Ortyn et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5506877 | Niklason et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526394 | Siczek | Jun 1996 | A |
5539797 | Heidsieck et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553111 | Moore | Sep 1996 | A |
5592562 | Rooks | Jan 1997 | A |
5594769 | Pellegrino et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596200 | Sharma | Jan 1997 | A |
5598454 | Franetzki | Jan 1997 | A |
5609152 | Pellegrino et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5627869 | Andrew et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642433 | Lee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642441 | Riley et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647025 | Frost et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657362 | Giger et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668889 | Hara | Sep 1997 | A |
5671288 | Wilhelm et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5712890 | Spivey | Jan 1998 | A |
5719952 | Rooks | Feb 1998 | A |
5735264 | Siczek et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763871 | Ortyn et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769086 | Ritchart et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773832 | Sayed et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5803912 | Siczek et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818898 | Tsukamoto et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828722 | Ploetz | Oct 1998 | A |
5835079 | Shieh | Nov 1998 | A |
5841124 | Ortyn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5872828 | Niklason et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875258 | Ortyn et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878104 | Ploetz | Mar 1999 | A |
5878746 | Lemelson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896437 | Ploetz | Apr 1999 | A |
5941832 | Tumey | Aug 1999 | A |
5954650 | Saito | Sep 1999 | A |
5986662 | Argiro | Nov 1999 | A |
6005907 | Ploetz | Dec 1999 | A |
6022325 | Siczek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6067079 | Shieh | May 2000 | A |
6075879 | Roehrig et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091841 | Rogers | Jul 2000 | A |
6101236 | Wang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102866 | Nields et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137527 | Abdel-Malek | Oct 2000 | A |
6141398 | He | Oct 2000 | A |
6149301 | Kautzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175117 | Komardin | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196715 | Nambu | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215892 | Douglass et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219059 | Argiro | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6256370 | Yavus | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233473 | Sheperd | May 2001 | B1 |
6243441 | Zur | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245028 | Furst et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272207 | Tang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289235 | Webber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292530 | Yavus | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293282 | Lemelson | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6327336 | Gingold et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327377 | Rutenberg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341156 | Baetz | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375352 | Hewes | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389104 | Bani-Hashemi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411836 | Patel | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415015 | Nicolas | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6424332 | Powell | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442288 | Haerer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459925 | Nields et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463181 | Duarte | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468226 | McIntyre, IV | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480565 | Ning | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6501819 | Unger et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6556655 | Chichereau | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6574304 | Hsieh | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6597762 | Ferrant | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611575 | Alyassin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6620111 | Stephens et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626849 | Huitema et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633674 | Barnes | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638235 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647092 | Eberhard | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650928 | Gailly | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6683934 | Zhao | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6744848 | Stanton | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6748044 | Sabol et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751285 | Eberhard | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758824 | Miller et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6813334 | Koppe | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6882700 | Wang | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885724 | Li | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6901156 | Giger et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6912319 | Barnes | May 2005 | B1 |
6940943 | Claus | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6978040 | Berestov | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987331 | Koeppe | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999554 | Mertelmeier | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022075 | Grunwald et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025725 | Dione et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030861 | Westerman | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7110490 | Eberhard | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110502 | Tsuji | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117098 | Dunlay et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7123684 | Jing et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7127091 | OpDeBeek | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7142633 | Eberhard | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7218766 | Eberhard | May 2007 | B2 |
7245694 | Jing et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7289825 | Fors et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7298881 | Giger et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7315607 | Ramsauer | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319735 | Defreitas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323692 | Rowlands | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7346381 | Okerlund et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7406150 | Minyard et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430272 | Jing et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7443949 | Defreitas et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466795 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7577282 | Gkanatsios et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7606801 | Faitelson et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616801 | Gkanatsios et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630533 | Ruth et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634050 | Muller et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640051 | Krishnan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7697660 | Ning | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702142 | Ren et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7705830 | Westerman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7760924 | Ruth et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769219 | Zahniser | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787936 | Kressy | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809175 | Roehrig et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7828733 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831296 | DeFreitas et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7869563 | DeFreitas | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7974924 | Holla et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991106 | Ren et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8044972 | Hall et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051386 | Rosander et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8126226 | Bernard et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155421 | Ren et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8165365 | Bernard et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8532745 | DeFreitas et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8571289 | Ruth | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8594274 | Hoernig et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8677282 | Cragun et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8712127 | Ren et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8897535 | Ruth et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8983156 | Periaswamy et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9020579 | Smith | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9075903 | Marshall | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9084579 | Ren et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9119599 | Itai | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129362 | Jerebko | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9289183 | Karssemeijer | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9451924 | Bernard | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9456797 | Ruth et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9478028 | Parthasarathy | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9589374 | Gao | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9592019 | Sugiyama | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9805507 | Chen | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9808215 | Ruth et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9811758 | Ren et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9901309 | DeFreitas et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10008184 | Kreeger et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10010302 | Ruth et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10092358 | DeFreitas | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10111631 | Gkanatsios | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10242490 | Karssemeijer | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10335094 | DeFreitas | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10357211 | Smith | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10410417 | Chen et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10413263 | Ruth et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10444960 | Marshall | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10456213 | DeFreitas | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10573276 | Kreeger et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10575807 | Gkanatsios | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10595954 | DeFreitas | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10624598 | Chen | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10977863 | Chen | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10978026 | Kreeger | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20010038681 | Stanton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010038861 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012450 | Tsuji | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020050986 | Inoue | May 2002 | A1 |
20020075997 | Unger et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020113681 | Byram | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122533 | Marie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020188466 | Barrette et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193676 | Bodicker | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030007598 | Wang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018272 | Treado et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026386 | Tang | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048260 | Matusis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030073895 | Nields et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095624 | Eberhard et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097055 | Yanof | May 2003 | A1 |
20030128893 | Castorina | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135115 | Burdette et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030169847 | Karellas | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030194050 | Eberhard | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194121 | Eberhard et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210254 | Doan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212327 | Wang | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215120 | Uppaluri | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008809 | Webber | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008900 | Jabri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008901 | Avinash | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036680 | Davis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047518 | Tiana | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040052328 | Saboi | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040066884 | Claus | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066904 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040070582 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077938 | Mark et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081273 | Ning | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040094167 | Brady | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101095 | Jing et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109028 | Stern et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109529 | Eberhard et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127789 | Ogawa | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138569 | Grunwald | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040171933 | Stoller et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040171986 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267157 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050047636 | Gines et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049521 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063509 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078797 | Danielsson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084060 | Seppi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050089205 | Kapur | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050105679 | Wu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107689 | Sasano | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111718 | MacMahon | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113681 | DeFreitas et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113715 | Schwindt et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124845 | Thomadsen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135555 | Claus | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135664 | Kaufhold | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050226375 | Eberhard | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060009693 | Hanover et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018526 | Avinash | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025680 | Jeune-Iomme | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030784 | Miller et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074288 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060098855 | Gkanatsios et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129062 | Nicoson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132508 | Sadikali | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060147099 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155209 | Miller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060197753 | Hotelling | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060210131 | Wheeler | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060228012 | Masuzawa | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238546 | Handley | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257009 | Wang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269040 | Mertelmeier | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291618 | Eberhard et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019846 | Bullitt et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030949 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036265 | Jing et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046649 | Reiner | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070052700 | Wheeler et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076844 | Defreitas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114424 | Danielsson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118400 | Morita et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156451 | Gering | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070223651 | Wagenaar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225600 | Weibrecht et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070236490 | Casteele | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070242800 | Jing et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263765 | Wu | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274585 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080019581 | Gkanatsios et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045833 | DeFreitas et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080101537 | Sendai | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114614 | Mahesh et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125643 | Huisman | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130979 | Ren | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080139896 | Baumgart | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152086 | Hall | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080165136 | Christie et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187095 | Boone et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198966 | Hjarn | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080229256 | Shibaike | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240533 | Piron et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080297482 | Weiss | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090003519 | DeFreitas | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005668 | West et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090010384 | Jing et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034684 | Bernard | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090037821 | O'Neal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090079705 | Sizelove et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080594 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080602 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080604 | Shores et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080752 | Ruth | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080765 | Bernard et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087067 | Khorasani | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123052 | Ruth | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129644 | Daw et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135997 | Defreitas et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138280 | Morita et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143674 | Nields | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167702 | Nurmi | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171244 | Ning | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090238424 | Arakita | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259958 | Ban | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268865 | Ren et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278812 | Yasutake | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296882 | Gkanatsios et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304147 | Jing et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034348 | Yu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049046 | Peiffer | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054400 | Ren et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079405 | Bernstein | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100086188 | Ruth et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088346 | Urness et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098214 | Star-Lack et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105879 | Katayose et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121178 | Krishnan et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131294 | Venon | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131482 | Linthicum et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100135558 | Ruth et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152570 | Navab | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166267 | Zhang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195882 | Ren et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208037 | Sendai | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231522 | Li | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100259561 | Forutanpour et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100259645 | Kaplan | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260316 | Stein et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280375 | Zhang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293500 | Cragun | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110018817 | Kryze | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019891 | Puong | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054944 | Sandberg et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069808 | Defreitas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069906 | Park | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087132 | DeFreitas et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105879 | Masumoto | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109650 | Kreeger | May 2011 | A1 |
20110110576 | Kreeger | May 2011 | A1 |
20110150447 | Li | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110163939 | Tam et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178389 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182402 | Partain | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110234630 | Batman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237927 | Brooks et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242092 | Kashiwagi | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110310126 | Georgiev et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014504 | Jang | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014578 | Karssemeijer | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120069951 | Toba | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120131488 | Karlsson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133600 | Marshall | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133601 | Marshall | May 2012 | A1 |
20120134464 | Hoernig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120148151 | Hamada | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120189092 | Jerebko | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194425 | Buelow | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238870 | Smith et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120293511 | Mertelmeier | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130022165 | Jang | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130044861 | Muller | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130059758 | Haick | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130108138 | Nakayama | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121569 | Yadav | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121618 | Yadav | May 2013 | A1 |
20130202168 | Jerebko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130259193 | Packard | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140033126 | Kreeger | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035811 | Guehring | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140064444 | Oh | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073913 | DeFreitas et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140219534 | Wiemker et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140219548 | Wels | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140327702 | Kreeger et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140328517 | Gluncic | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150052471 | Chen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150061582 | Smith | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150238148 | Georgescu et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150302146 | Marshall | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309712 | Marshall | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317538 | Ren et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150331995 | Zhao | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160000399 | Halmann et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022364 | DeFreitas et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160051215 | Chen | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160078645 | Abdurahman | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160228034 | Gluncic | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160235380 | Smith | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160367210 | Gkanatsios | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170071562 | Suzuki | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170262737 | Rabinovich | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180047211 | Chen et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180137385 | Ren | May 2018 | A1 |
20180144244 | Masoud | May 2018 | A1 |
20180256118 | DeFreitas | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190015173 | DeFreitas | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190043456 | Kreeger | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190290221 | Smith | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200046303 | DeFreitas | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200093562 | DeFreitas | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200205928 | DeFreitas | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200253573 | Gkanatsios | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200345320 | Chen | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200390404 | DeFreitas | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210000553 | St. Pierre | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210100518 | Chui | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210100626 | St. Pierre | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210113167 | Chui | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118199 | Chui | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20220005277 | Chen | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220013089 | Kreeger | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2014339982 | Apr 2015 | AU |
1846622 | Oct 2006 | CN |
202161328 | Mar 2012 | CN |
102429678 | May 2012 | CN |
107440730 | Dec 2017 | CN |
102010009295 | Aug 2011 | DE |
102011087127 | May 2013 | DE |
775467 | May 1997 | EP |
982001 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1428473 | Jun 2004 | EP |
2236085 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2215600 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2301432 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2491863 | Aug 2012 | EP |
1986548 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2656789 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2823464 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2823765 | Jan 2015 | EP |
3060132 | Apr 2019 | EP |
H09-198490 | Jul 1997 | JP |
H09-238934 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-33523 | Feb 1998 | JP |
H10-33523 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2000-200340 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2002-282248 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-189179 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-199737 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-531516 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2006-519634 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2006-312026 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007-130487 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-330334 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2007-536968 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-068032 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009-034503 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-522005 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2009-526618 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-207545 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010-137004 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2012-501750 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012011255 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-061196 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2013-244211 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2014-507250 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014-534042 | Dec 2014 | JP |
2015-506794 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2016-198197 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2016-198197 | Dec 2016 | JP |
10-2015-001051 | Jan 2015 | KR |
1020150010515 | Jan 2015 | KR |
10-2017-006283 | Jun 2017 | KR |
1020170062839 | Jun 2017 | KR |
9005485 | May 1990 | WO |
9317620 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9406352 | Mar 1994 | WO |
199700649 | Jan 1997 | WO |
199816903 | Apr 1998 | WO |
0051484 | Sep 2000 | WO |
2003020114 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2005051197 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005110230 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2005112767 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006055830 | May 2006 | WO |
2006058160 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007095330 | Aug 2007 | WO |
08014670 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2008047270 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008054436 | May 2008 | WO |
2009026587 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2010028208 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010059920 | May 2010 | WO |
2011008239 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011043838 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011065950 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011073864 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011091300 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012001572 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012068373 | May 2012 | WO |
2012063653 | May 2012 | WO |
2012112627 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012122399 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013001439 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013035026 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013078476 | May 2013 | WO |
2013123091 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2014149554 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014207080 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015061582 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015066650 | May 2015 | WO |
2015130916 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016103094 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016184746 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2018183548 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2018183549 | Oct 2018 | WO |
2018183550 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO2018236565 | Dec 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 7, 2018 for PCT/US2018/035331, Applicant Hologic, Inc., 12 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) for PCT/US2018/035331US, Applicant: Hologio Inc., Form PCT/IB/326 and 373, dated Jan. 2, 2020 (9 pages). |
Ahmad A Al Sallab et al., “Self Learning Machines Using Deep Networks”, Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), 2011 Int'l. Conference of IEEE, Oct. 14, 2011, pp. 21-26. |
Ghiassi M et al., “A Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks”, Neurocomputing, vol. 63, Aug. 20, 2004, pp. 397-413. |
European Search Report in Application 18820591.8, dated Mar. 4, 2021, 9 pages. |
Caroline, B.E et al., “Computer aided detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: A review”, 2012 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Science, Engineering and Technology (INCOSET), Tiruchirappalli, 2012, pp. 186-191. |
Ertas, M. et al., “2D versus 3D total variation minimization in digital breast tomosynthesis”, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST), Macau, 2015, pp. 1-4. |
Giger et al. “Development of a smart workstation for use in mammography”, in Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 1445 (1991), p. 101103; 4 pages. |
Giger et al., “An Intelligent Workstation for Computer-aided Diagnosis”, in RadioGraphics, May 1993, 13:3 pp. 647-656; 10 pages. |
eFilm Mobile HD by Merge Healthcare, web site: http://itunes.apple.com/bw/app/efilm-mobile-hd/id405261243?mt=8, accessed on Nov. 3, 2011 (2 pages). |
eFilm Solutions, eFilm Workstation (tm) 3.4, website: http://estore.merge.com/na/estore/content.aspx?productlD=405, accessed on Nov. 3, 2011 (2 pages). |
Wodajo, Felasfa, MD, “Now Playing: Radiology Images from Your Hospital PACS on your iPad,” Mar. 17, 2010; web site: http://www.imedicalapps.com/2010/03/now-playing-radiology-images-from-your-hospital-pacs-on-your-ipad/, accessed on Nov. 3, 2011 (3 pages). |
Lewin,JM, et al., Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 2003; 229:261-268. |
Berg, WA et al., “Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer”, JAMA 299:2151-2163, 2008. |
Carton, AK, et al., “Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis—a feasibility study”, BR J Radiol. Apr. 2010;83 (988):344-50. |
Chen, SC, et al., “Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis”, Acad Radio. Feb. 2007 14(2):229-38. |
Diekmann, F., et al., “Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement”, Invest Radiol 2005; 40:397-404. |
Dromain C., et al., “Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a multi-reader study”, RSNA 2010, 96th Scientific Assembly and Scientific Meeting. |
Dromain, C., et al., “Contrast-enhanced digital mammography”, Eur J Radiol. 2009; 69:34-42. |
Freiherr, G., “Breast tomosynthesis trials show promise”, Diagnostic lmaging—San Francisco 2005, V27; N4:42-48. |
ICRP Publication 60: 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 12 pages. |
Jochelson, M., et al., “Bilateral Dual Energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial Experience”, RSNA 2010, 96th Scientific Assembly and Scientific Meeting, 1 page. |
Jong, RA, et al., Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2003; 228:842-850. |
Kopans, et al. Will tomosynthesis replace conventional mammography? Plenary Session SFN08: RSNA 2005. |
Lehman, CD, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295-1303. |
Lindfors, KK, et al., Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2008; 246(3): 725-733. |
Niklason, L., et al., Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. Nov. 1997; 205(2):399-406. |
Poplack, SP, et al., Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenology Sep. 2007 189(3):616-23. |
Prionas, ND, et al., Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology. Sep. 2010 256(3):714-723. |
Rafferty, E. et al., “Assessing Radiologist Performance Using Combined Full-Field Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Alone: Results”. . . presented at 2007 Radiological Society of North America meeting, Chicago IL. |
Smith, A., “Full field breast tomosynthesis”, Radiol Manage. Sep.-Oct. 2005; 27(5):25-31. |
Weidner N, et al., “Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma”, New England Journal of Medicine 1991; 324:1-8. |
Weidner, N, “The importance of tumor angiogenesis: the evidence continues to grow”, AM J Clin Pathol. Nov. 2004 122(5):696-703. |
Hologic, Inc., 510(k) Summary, prepared Nov. 28, 2010, for Affirm Breast Biopsy Guidance System Special 510(k) Premarket Notification, 5 pages. |
Hologic, Inc., 510(k) Summary, prepared Aug. 14, 2012, for Affirm Breast Biopsy Guidance System Special 510(k) Premarket Notification, 5 pages. |
“Filtered Back Projection”, (NYGREN), published May 8, 2007, URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991010131715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/˜elec539/Projects97/cult/node 2.html, 2 pgs. |
Hologic, “Lorad StereoLoc II” Operator's Manual 9-500-0261, Rev. 005, 2004, 78 pgs. |
Shrading, Simone et al., “Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy: Initial Experiences and Comparison with Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy”, the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Univ. of Aachen, Germany, published Nov. 12, 2014, 10 pgs. |
“Supersonic to feature Aixplorer Ultimate at ECR”, AuntiMinnie.com, 3 pages (Feb. 2018). |
Bushberg, Jerrold et al., “The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging”, 3rd ed., In: “The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, Third Edition”, Dec. 28, 2011, Lippincott & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA, XP05579051, pp. 270-272. |
Dromain, Clarisse et al., “Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results”, European Radiology, Sep. 14, 2010, vol. 21, pp. 565-574. |
Reynolds, April, “Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: A Review”, Radiologic Technology, vol. 80, No. 5, Jun. 1, 2009, pp. 447M-464M, XP055790574. |
E. Shaw de Paredes et al., “Interventional Breast Procedure”, published Sep./Oct. 1998 in Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, pp. 138-184. |
Burbank, Fred, “Stereotactic Breast Biopsy: Its History, Its Present, and Its Future”, published in 1996 at the Southeastern Surgical Congress, 24 pages. |
Georgian-Smith, Dianne, et al., “Stereotactic Biopsy of the Breast Using an Upright Unit, a Vacuum-Suction Needle, and a Lateral Arm-Support System”, 2001, at the American Roentgen Ray Society meeting, 8 pages. |
Fischer Imaging Corp, Mammotest Plus manual on minimally invasive breast biopsy system, 2002, 8 pages. |
Fischer Imaging Corporation, Installation Manual, MammoTest Family of Breast Biopsy Systems, 86683G, 86684G, pp. 55957-IM, Issue 1, Revision 3, Jul. 2005, 98 pages. |
Fischer Imaging Corporation, Operator Manual, MammoTest Family of Breast Biopsy Systems, 86683G, 86684G, pp. 55956-OM, Issue 1, Revision 6, Sep. 2005, 258 pages. |
Koechli, Ossi R., “Available Sterotactic Systems for Breast Biopsy”, Renzo Brun del Re (Ed.), Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsies, Recent Results in Cancer Research 173:105-113; Springer-Verlag, 2009. |
Chan, Heang-Ping et al., “ROC Study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions,” Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005, 1001-1009. |
Lilja, Mikko, “Fast and accurate voxel projection technique in free-form cone-beam geometry with application to algebraic reconstruction,” Applies Sciences on Biomedical and Communication Technologies, 2008, Isabel '08, first international symposium on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 25, 2008. |
Pathmanathan et al., “Predicting tumour location by simulating large deformations of the breast using a 3D finite element model and nonlinear elasticity”, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 217-224, vol. 3217 (2004). |
Pediconi, “Color-coded automated signal intensity-curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of new software for MR-based breast imaging,” International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086. |
Sakic et al., “Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation” Medical Physics. 29, pp. 2131-2139 (2002). |
Samani, A. et al., “Biomechanical 3-D Finite Element Modeling of the Human Breast Using MRI Data”, 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 271-279. |
Yin, H.M., et al., “Image Parser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical images”, BioMedical Engineering Online. 3:31, pp. 1-9, Oct. 1, 2004. |
Van Schie, Guido, et al., “Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms”, Med. Phys. 40(4), Apr. 2013, 41902-1 -41902-11. |
Van Schie, Guido, et al., “Generating Synthetic Mammograms from Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, No. 12, Dec. 2013, 2322-2331. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200184262 A1 | Jun 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62522241 | Jun 2017 | US |