The subject matter disclosed herein relates to a dynamoelectric machines. More specifically, the subject matter disclosed herein relates to a support system for a dynamoelectric machine.
A stator of a dynamoelectric machine, such as an electric power generator, generally includes a stator core and a stator frame. The stator core typically has a cylindrical shape and includes a stack of insulated steel laminations. Each lamination is a segment of a full circle that has slots on its inner diameter to accommodate a stator winding and dovetail slots on its outer diameter. The stator frame has a plurality of key bars connected thereto; each key bar having a dovetail to provide structural support for the stator core. The key bars are traditionally coupled to spring bars, which are bolted to section pads. The section pads are directly welded to section plates.
The spring bars are machined to include a relief cut, which enables stiffness tuning of the suspension system, and the section pads are machined to allow the suspension system to wrap around the circumference of the stator frame. These traditional configurations may involve costly, high-strength materials that may be resistant to welding, as well as expensive assembly processes.
A support system for a dynamoelectric machine is disclosed. In one embodiment, the support system includes: a mounting pad having a first face and a second face, the second face including a pair of slots; a pair of spring bars welded or brazed to the mounting pad at the pair of slots; a collar welded or brazed to the first face of the mounting pad; and a key bar between and affixed to the pair of spring bars.
A first aspect of the invention provides for a support system including: a mounting pad having a first face and a second face, the second face including a pair of slots; a pair of spring bars welded or brazed to the mounting pad at the pair of slots; a collar welded or brazed to the first face of the mounting pad; and a key bar between and affixed to the pair of spring bars.
A second aspect of the invention provides for a dynamoelectric apparatus comprising: a rotor; and a stator substantially surrounding the rotor, the stator including: a support system comprising: a mounting pad having a radially outward face and a radially inward face, the radially inward face including a pair of slots; a pair of spring bars welded or brazed to the mounting pad at the pair of slots; a collar welded or brazed to the radially outward face of the mounting pad; and a key bar between and affixed to the pair of spring bars.
A third aspect of the invention provides for a power generation system comprising: a turbine; a rotor coupled to the turbine; and a stator substantially surrounding the rotor, the stator including: a support system comprising: a mounting pad having a radially outward face and a radially inward face, the radially inward face including a pair of slots; a pair of spring bars welded or brazed to the mounting pad at the pair of slots; a collar welded or brazed to the radially outward face of the mounting pad; and a key bar between and affixed to the pair of spring bars.
These and other features of this invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that depict various embodiments of the invention, in which:
It is noted that the drawings of the invention may not be to scale. The drawings are intended to depict only typical aspects of the invention, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope of the invention. In the drawings, like numbering represents like elements between the drawings.
As indicated above, aspects of the invention provide for a support system (or, suspension system) for a dynamoelectric machine. More specifically, aspects of the invention include a support system providing assistance in isolating dynamoelectric machine stator core vibrations.
Traditional dynamoelectric machine support systems include a stator frame having a plurality of key bars connected thereto, each key bar having a dovetail to provide structural support for the stator core. The key bars are traditionally coupled to spring bars, which are bolted to section pads. The section pads are directly welded to section plates. These support systems may help to isolate vibrations in e.g., the stator core.
The spring bars are machined to include relief cuts, which enables stiffness tuning of the support system, and the section pads are machined to allow the suspension system to wrap around the circumference of the stator frame. The inner diameter (the portion facing radially inward on an assembled dynamoelectric machine) of each section pad is traditionally machined using a vertical boring machine to allow the suspension system to wrap around the stator circumference. Additionally, in order to allow for flexibility of the spring bars, the relief cuts are made in portions of the spring bars not bolted to the section pads. Machining of the spring bars and section pads may be time consuming and costly. Additionally, traditional suspension systems require the use of high-strength materials (e.g., having a tensile strength of over 95 Kpsi), due to their design and the machining required. These high-strength materials may be costly, and may also be difficult to machine and/or weld.
In contrast to traditional dynamoelectric machine suspension systems, aspects of the invention provide for a dynamoelectric machine suspension system requiring less machining and lower-cost materials. In one embodiment, the suspension system may include: a mounting pad having a first face and a second face, the second face including a pair of slots; a pair of spring bars welded (or, alternatively, brazed) to the mounting pad at the slots; a collar welded (or, alternatively, brazed) to the first face of the mounting pad; and a key bar between and affixed to the pair of spring bars. Turning to
Turning to
Also illustrated in
Turning to
Turning to
Turning to
In any case, support structure 10 (and similarly, support system 200) may allow for the use of lower strength materials in forming a support system for a dynamoelectric machine than used in conventional support systems. That is, due to the reduction in the amount of bolted connections (e.g., elimination of bolt connections between spring bar 50 and pad 20), and the use of welds (or, alternatively, braze joints), a material having a tensile strength of approximately 70 Kpsi or less may be suitable for a spring bar 50 affixed to mounting pad 20. For example, spring bar 50 may be formed of a material such as A36 steel, having a tensile strength of approximately 60-70 Kpsi or less, or AISI C1018 carbon steel, having a tensile strength of approximately 70 Kpsi or less. Additionally, distinct portions of a support system (e.g., support system 200 of
Additionally, with reference to the
Turning to
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2199141 | Rice | Apr 1940 | A |
2199156 | Grobel | Apr 1940 | A |
2199351 | Taylor | Apr 1940 | A |
2424299 | Baudry et al. | Jul 1947 | A |
2489109 | Shildneck et al. | Nov 1949 | A |
2554226 | Taylor | May 1951 | A |
2561994 | Rashevsky et al. | Jul 1951 | A |
2811658 | Brainard | Oct 1957 | A |
2811659 | Barlow et al. | Oct 1957 | A |
2846603 | Webster et al. | Aug 1958 | A |
3462624 | Darrieus | Aug 1969 | A |
3531667 | Barton et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3652889 | Reece et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3708707 | Kranz | Jan 1973 | A |
3988622 | Starcevic | Oct 1976 | A |
4110652 | McGahern | Aug 1978 | A |
4204313 | Khutoretsky et al. | May 1980 | A |
4425523 | Detinko et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4469973 | Guyot et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4536671 | Miller | Aug 1985 | A |
4634909 | Brem | Jan 1987 | A |
4663553 | Zimmermann | May 1987 | A |
4891540 | Cooper et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5796191 | Schwanda | Aug 1998 | A |
5875540 | Sargeant et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6104116 | Fuller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6144129 | Fuller et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6321439 | Berrong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346760 | Boardman, IV | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6498417 | Fuller | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6628027 | Fuller | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6720699 | Shah et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
7202587 | Sargeant et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7302754 | Majernik et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7353586 | Majernik et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397163 | Cook et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7714477 | Nagashima et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7827676 | Allen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7923891 | Kikuichi | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7946028 | Majernik et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8040014 | Boardman et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8138654 | Boardman, IV | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8319405 | Allen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20110210643 | Tanavde et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120043861 | Allen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120104760 | Tanavde et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1162998 | Sep 1969 | GB |
2470467 | Nov 2010 | GB |
2740466 | Nov 2010 | GB |
2475599 | May 2011 | GB |
2478191 | Aug 2011 | GB |
54162107 | Dec 1979 | JP |
55086348 | Jun 1980 | JP |
61049629 | Mar 1986 | JP |
61244238 | Oct 1986 | JP |
62260538 | Nov 1987 | JP |
2007166726 | Jun 2007 | JP |
0057353 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Boardman IV et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,751, filed Nov. 20, 2009, Note: No file attached—Publication of this Application is still Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,751, filed Nov. 20, 2009, Office Action dated May 20, 2011. |
Great Britain Patent Application No. 1018954.6, Search Report dated Mar. 11, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,751, filed Nov. 20, 2009, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due dated Jul. 18, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/622,751, filed Nov. 20, 2009, Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2011. |
Great Britian Patent Application No. 1018954.6, Search Report dated Aug. 4, 2011. |
Dywidag-Systems International, “Dywidag Post-Tensioning Systems; Multistrand Systems; Bar Systems; Repair and Strengthening,” Apr. 2006, 31 pages, retrieved from: http://www.dsiamerica.com/uploads/media/DSI-USA—Bonded-Post-Tensioning-Systems—us—01.pdf. |
Amsysco, “Material Properties of Post-Tension Strands,” Jan. 2010, 3 pages, retrieved from: http://www.amsyscoinc.com/2010/01/29/material-properties-of-post-tension-strands/. |
Post-Tensioning Institute, “What is Post-Tensioning?,” Dec. 2000, 2 pages, retrieved from: http://www.dsiamerica.com/uploads/media/DSI-USA—What—is—Post-Tensioning—us—02.pdf. |
Vsl, “VSL Post-Tensioning Technology,” 2013, 10 pages, retrieved from: http://www.vsl.com/index.php? option=com—content&task=blogcategory&id=17&itemid=86. |
Tensioning Materials for Prestressed Concrete, “Ultra-high Strength Prestressing Strand,” 1 page, retrieved from: http://www.sei-ssw.co.jp/en/pdf/prestressed—concrete—catalog—05.pdf. |
Sumitomo Electric, “Super-High—Tension Prestressed Concrete Strand 15.7 mm in Diameter,” 2013, 2 pages, Newsletter “SEI NEWS, ” vol. 414, retrieved from http://global-sei.com/sn/2012/414/3a.html. |
Great Britain Intellectual Property Office, Search Report for Application No. GB1103083.0 dated Jun. 24, 2011, 4 pages. |
Andrews, Office Action Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 12/713,505 dated Jun. 21, 2011, 24 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120104760 A1 | May 2012 | US |