The present invention relates generally to semiconductor devices, and more particularly to integrated circuits with memory devices commonly called electrical fuses (“E-fuses”).
Many integrated circuits (“ICs”) are made up of millions of interconnected devices, such as transistors, resistors, capacitors, and diodes, on a single chip of semiconductor substrate. It is generally desirable that ICs operate as fast as possible, and consume as little power as possible. Semiconductor ICs often include one or more types of memory, such as CMOS memory, antifuse memory, and e-fuse memory.
E-fuses are usually integrated into semiconductor ICs by using a stripe (commonly also called a “link”) of conducting material (metal, poly-silicon, etc.) between two pads, generally referred to as anode and cathode, so that at a fuse current level (IFUSE) the link is thermally destroyed, thus changing the resistance of the E-fuse. This is commonly referred to as “programming” the e-fuse. The fuse state (i.e., whether it has been programmed) can be read using a sensing circuit, which are common in the art of electronic memories.
Unfortunately, conventional E-fuses require substantial current to program, which can cause programming damage to other portions of the IC. Programming reliability is also a concern for conventional E-fuses. Manufacturing variations lead to variations in the optimal programming energy. In some instances, the link is not completely broken, or damage from fuse programming results in a current path having a resistance less than the resistance specified to indicate a programmed fuse.
Another problem arising with E-fuses is that conventional designs do not reliably scale to smaller design geometries. For example, an E-fuse that works acceptably well (i.e., reliably programs to a high-resistance state) in an IC fabricated according to a 90 nm node geometry might produce an unacceptably high number of programming failures when the IC is adapted to a smaller process node such as 65 nm node geometry. Similarly, smaller node geometries are often associated with a lower IC operating voltage, which provides less programming energy for a given programming current. Conventional E-fuses require programming conditions that may be difficult to obtain with a low-voltage IC.
It is desirable to provide E-fuses that avoid limitations of conventional E-fuses.
An electronic fuse (“E-fuse”) has a silicide filament link extending along a gap between polysilicon structures formed on a silicon substrate. The silicide filament link extends across diffusions formed in the gap. A P-N junction between terminals of the E-fuse provides high resistivity after programming (fusing) the silicide filament link. In a particular embodiment, the diffusions include a first diffusion and a second diffusion. A further embodiment includes a lightly doped diffusion. In a particular embodiment, the E-fuse is a non-volatile memory element in a CMOS integrated circuit.
In a particular embodiment, the silicide-forming layer 104 is a layer of metal, such as cobalt or other silicide-forming metal, of which several are well-known, and the spacers 106, 108 are polysilicon spacers that are fabricated to be a minimum spacing apart dpoly.
As is well known in the art of IC fabrication, different features have different minimum spacings, also known as critical minimum spacings, that depend on the node geometry that the IC is designed in. For example, the minimum poly-to-poly spacing in a 90 nm node design is usually greater than the minimum poly-to-poly spacing in a 65 nm node design or in a 45 nm node design. The minimum spacing dpoly is the minimum poly-to-poly spacing for an arbitrary node geometry. A gap is formed between the polysilicon structures 106, 108 having an initial width of dpoly.
The sidewall spacers 107, 109 reduce the spacing between the polysilicon structures 106, 108 so that the width d of the metal filament 102 is less than the minimum poly spacing dpoly. The metal filament 102 is deposited in a gap 111 between the sidewall spacers 107, 109. The gap 111 has a width less than the initial width. The polysilicon structures 106, 108 and the sidewall spacers 107, 109 also provide a shadowing effect in some embodiments so that the thickness of the metal filament 102 tM2 is less than the thickness tM1 of the metal layer 104 formed on the field of the device. In a particular embodiment, the width d of the metal filament is less than a minimum lithographic feature size. A metal filament of such nature is commonly referred to as “sublithographic” because the dimension d is below the dimension that can be reliably established by the lithographic process (e.g., dpoly) for a given node spacing design (e.g., 90 nm design).
A P-type well (see
P-N junctions are formed between the N+ and NLDD 202, 210 and the P-type well, and between the NLDD 210 and the P+ diffusion 212. A tap (not shown) is typically provided to bias the well to a selected electrical potential relative to other terminals of the fuse, as is known in the art, and can be used to reverse bias the PN junctions. Isolation structures 204, 205, such as trenches filled with dielectric material, electrically isolate the E-fuse from adjacent devices, as is well-known in the art of IC design and fabrication. Alternatively, the E-fuse is formed in an N-well and a diffusion area is a P-type LDD area.
Polysilicon structures 206, 208 are fabricated to be within a minimum poly-to-poly spacing, and the silicide filament link 120 has been formed in the area between the sidewall spacers 107, 109. The polysilicon structures are drawn about 1 micron wide and poly rounding is not an issue. The width of the silicide filament link 120 is less than the minimum poly-to-poly spacing for the node geometry of the IC. Conductive traces 214, 216 formed in a first patterned metal layer (commonly called “M1 layer”) are connected to programming or sense circuits (not shown) through contacts 218, 220, which are shown as dashed lines because they underlie the traces 214, 216 (see also,
Before programming, the silicide filament link provides a low resistance current path between the contacts 214, 216. After the silicide filament link 120 has been blown during programming, the P-N junction blocks current flow from one trace 214 to another 216 to provide high resistance (typically at least 100 times the pre-programming resistance) between the contacts 214, 216.
A conventional fuse link requires more energy to program than the silicide filament link 120. This higher programming energy can result in more damage to the surrounding material, both above the link in what is commonly called the BEOL (back end of line) structures, and to the silicon surrounding the link. Such damage can result in a current path that causes the resistance between traces 214, 216 to be less than the desired programmed resistance for the E-fuse.
The reduced programming energy needed to fuse the small cross sectional area of the silicide filament link 120 is less likely to cause such damage. Even if slight programming damage occurs, the damage is likely to be limited to the NLDD region 202, which forms a P-N junction with the P-well 228 that blocks substantial current flow between the traces, providing a programmed E-fuse with a high programmed resistance.
A lightly doped diffusion having a second conductivity type (e.g., NLDD) is formed in the well (step 408). A first diffusion having the second conductivity type (e.g., N+ diffusion) is formed in the well (step 410). A second diffusion having the first conductivity type (e.g., P+ diffusion) is formed in the well (step 412). After completing these three steps, the lightly doped diffusion may be located between the first diffusion and the second diffusion. The above sequence of forming the diffusions is not essential. For example, the P+ diffusion could be formed before the N+ diffusion; however, the LDD is usually performed prior to the P+/N+ implants.
A silicide forming layer is deposited on the substrate (step 414). The silicon substrate is processed to form a silicide filament link in the gap between the first and second structures (step 416). Typically, silicide is also formed on the exposed silicon surface of the first diffusion and the remaining portions of the exposed silicon surfaces of the lightly doped diffusion and the second diffusion, and other areas of exposed silicon of the substrate, such as silicon gate and source/drain contact areas of FETs.
The FPGA architecture includes a large number of different programmable tiles including multi-gigabit transceivers (MGTs 501), configurable logic blocks (CLBs 502), random access memory blocks (BRAMs 503), input/output blocks (IOBs 504), configuration and clocking logic (CONFIG/CLOCKS 505), digital signal processing blocks (DSPs 506), specialized input/output blocks (I/O 507) (e.g., configuration ports and clock ports), and other programmable logic 508 such as digital clock managers, analog-to-digital converters, system monitoring logic, and so forth. Some FPGAs also include dedicated processor blocks (PROC 510).
In some FPGAs, each programmable tile includes a programmable interconnect element (INT 511) having standardized connections to and from a corresponding interconnect element in each adjacent tile. Therefore, the programmable interconnect elements taken together implement the programmable interconnect structure for the illustrated FPGA. The programmable interconnect element (INT 511) also includes the connections to and from the programmable logic element within the same tile, as shown by the examples included at the top of
For example, a CLB 502 can include a configurable logic element (CLE 512) that can be programmed to implement user logic plus a single programmable interconnect element (INT 511). A BRAM 503 can include a BRAM logic element (BRL 513) in addition to one or more programmable interconnect elements. Typically, the number of interconnect elements included in a tile depends on the height of the tile. In the pictured embodiment, a BRAM tile has the same height as four CLBs, but other numbers (e.g., five) can also be used. A DSP tile 506 can include a DSP logic element (DSPL 514) in addition to an appropriate number of programmable interconnect elements. An IOB 504 can include, for example, two instances of an input/output logic element (IOL 515) in addition to one instance of the programmable interconnect element (INT 511). As will be clear to those of skill in the art, the actual I/O pads connected, for example, to the I/O logic element 515 are manufactured using metal layered above the various illustrated logic blocks, and typically are not confined to the area of the input/output logic element 515. In the pictured embodiment, a columnar area near the center of the die (shown shaded in
Some FPGAs utilizing the architecture illustrated in
Note that
While the present invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments, variations of these embodiments will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art. Other materials may be used to form the spacers and other separation may be suitable to form thin silicide filament links. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the foregoing description.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4219836 | McElroy | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4238839 | Redfern et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4562454 | Schultz et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4647340 | Szluk et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4872140 | Graham et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 5166758 | Ovshinsky et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5708291 | Bohr et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5742555 | Marr et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5874851 | Shiota | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6060743 | Sugiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6258700 | Bohr et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6368902 | Kothandaraman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6496416 | Look | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6522582 | Rao et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6525397 | Kalnitsky et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6597013 | Romas, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6621095 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6671205 | Look | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6703680 | Toyoshima | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6804159 | Kamiya et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6807079 | Mei et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6882571 | Look | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6911360 | Li et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6930920 | Look | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6933591 | Sidhu et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6936527 | Look | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 7026692 | Look | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7068072 | New et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7092273 | Look | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7098721 | Ouellette et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7180102 | Hui | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7224633 | Hovis et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 20020074618 | Marshall et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20030211661 | Marr et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040004268 | Brown et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040124458 | Kothandaraman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050067670 | Hui | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229142 | Boppana et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050247997 | Chung et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050280083 | Vogelsang | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285224 | Tsutsui | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060170055 | Mitros et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060237818 | Chang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060249808 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070063313 | Barth et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070210412 | Booth et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070252237 | Ko et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20090003028 | Keshavarzi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090224323 | Im et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 161 947 | Nov 1985 | EP |
| 2007 042780 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007 194377 | Aug 2007 | JP |