1. Field of the Invention
The invention pertains to the field of hearing protection. More particularly, the invention pertains to hearing protection using an artificial ear structure.
2. Description of Related Art
“Artificial ears” are used as objective measuring apparatus to measure sound levels, as for example for frequency response, sensitivity and distortion measurements on earphones. They enable electroacoustical measurements on either insert earphones or headphones to be carried out under well-defined acoustical conditions, which are of great importance for the comparability of different designs and the reproducibility of measurements.
International Telecommunications Union standard ITU-T P.57 (November 2005) defines a standard for artificial ears. The geometry of Type 3.4 artificial ears (“Pinna simulator—simplified”) is shown in
Studies, such as “Sound transmission to and within the human ear canal”, Hammershøi and Møller, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 (1) (July 1996), have shown that recordings using a microphone in a blocked human ear canal retain the acoustic timing cues and directional dependence needed for accurate localization. The concha geometry is needed to simulate human ear response, regarding localization, while the ear canal geometry is not. The blocked canal recordings are frequency equalized when played back for the user to compensate for the ear canal, speaker, microphone, amplifier, and other responses to provide the proper frequency response at the user's ear canal.
The invention provides an improved hearing protection system with talk-through using earcups which have microphones, amplifiers and speakers, utilizing a structure based on a modified artificial ear.
The earcups 1 and 2 incorporate a significantly modified version of the artificial ears described in the International Telecommunications Union standard ITU-T P.57 (November 2005), in the form of a concha simulator having a volume similar to that of a human ear. By coupling the microphone to the concha simulator, instead of directly to the outside, the acoustic response of the talk-through more accurately reproduces the directional hearing characteristics of a user, making environmental clues fed to the user through the talk-through system more useful.
An article by Burkhard and Sachs in the Journal of Acoustical Society of America (“Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 58, No. 1 July 1975) states that average concha volume is 4.65 cc for men and 3.94 cc for women with standard deviation of 0.76 cc for men and 0.81 cc for women. Hence, the concha simulator of the invention is preferably approximately 4.30 cc in volume. However, adding 2 standard deviations for women and 2 for men gives a possible volume range for the concha simulator of approximately 6.17 cc to 2.32 cc. The average depth of the human concha is approximately 1.29 cm, while the average concha breadth is 1.80 cm, according to Burkhard and Sachs. The concha simulator should preferably be approximately this deep as well with a similar breadth. The overall concha simulator length should be approximately 1.85 cm, which is determined by dividing the concha volume by the concha depth and length. However, various other reasonable geometries can be used. The concha simulator should be rigid and not allow sound to penetrate into the earcup, else the user will be exposed to noise.
As shown in
The opening is no longer a small hole, as shown at 20 in prior art
Acoustic foam 43 is preferably placed in the volume of the concha simulator 42 to dampen acoustic resonances. The microphone 23 is sealed in a small chamber 24, but is coupled to the concha simulator 42 using a horn-shaped tube 44. The horn-shaped tube 44 can be used to acoustically amplify sounds above 1 kHz if desired, with the length and cross-sectional area of the tubing and flaring of the horn determining the acoustic amplification. The relationship between a length of straight tubing and resonance with a microphone mounted at the end is approximately wavelength=34,300/(4×frequency). For example, using a straight tube of length 1.72 cm will boost the frequency response at approximately 5,000 Hz. The relationship between a length of horn-shaped tubing and amplification frequency is more complicated, but can be found in many acoustics books.
It is advantageous to use a relatively soft material for the tubing so that the microphone is vibration isolated from the rigid earcup. However, the tubing must be stiff enough that sound doesn't propagate through the walls of the tubing and into the earcup volume.
Alternatively, as shown in
Accordingly, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention herein described are merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the invention. Reference herein to details of the illustrated embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of the claims, which themselves recite those features regarded as essential to the invention.
This is a continuation patent application of copending application Ser. No. 12/789,942, filed May 28, 2010, entitled “Ear Defender With Concha Simulator”, which claimed benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of the U.S. provisional application No. 61/182,921, filed Jun. 1, 2009. The aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with Government support under SBIR Phase II contract N68335-06-C-0372, awarded by the US Navy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2643729 | McCracken | Jun 1953 | A |
2946862 | Wadsworth et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3683130 | Kahn | Aug 1972 | A |
3952158 | Kyle | Apr 1976 | A |
4006318 | Sebesta et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4037064 | Yasuda | Jul 1977 | A |
4064362 | Williams | Dec 1977 | A |
4088849 | Usami et al. | May 1978 | A |
4308426 | Kikuchi | Dec 1981 | A |
4441576 | Allen | Apr 1984 | A |
4924502 | Allen et al. | May 1990 | A |
4972491 | Wilcox, Jr. | Nov 1990 | A |
5305387 | Sapiejewski | Apr 1994 | A |
5333206 | Koss | Jul 1994 | A |
5357585 | Kumar | Oct 1994 | A |
5426719 | Franks et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5551090 | Thompson | Sep 1996 | A |
5887286 | Waldron | Mar 1999 | A |
6118878 | Jones | Sep 2000 | A |
6445805 | Grugel | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6567525 | Sapiejewski | May 2003 | B1 |
6683965 | Sapiejewski | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7212645 | Le Gette et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7352871 | Mozo | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7564989 | Schanz | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8059851 | Pfanner | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8213643 | Hemer | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8224011 | Heringslack | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8638963 | Parkins | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9208769 | Azmi | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20030095670 | Wurtz | May 2003 | A1 |
20030185403 | Sibbald | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040165742 | Shennib et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060013409 | Desloge | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060153414 | Liao | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070274529 | Nordin | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080025524 | Vaudrey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090041285 | Parkins et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100080400 | Sibbald et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100166204 | Yanagishita | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110164757 | Sibbald et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110261965 | Parkins | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20140169579 | Azmi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150030173 | Foudhaili | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150078570 | Grone | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006118516 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hammershoi et al. “Sound transmission to and within the human ear canal” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100(1). Jul. 1996. |
Burkhard et al. “Anthropometric Manikin for Acoustic Research.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58(1). Jul. 1975. |
Type 3.4 (artificial ear) Pinna simulator—simplified. International Telecommunications Union standard ITU-T P.57. Nov. 2005. |
Chapin, et al., “Concept and Technology Exploration for Transparent Hearing Project Final Report,” May 30, 2003, relevant pp. 31-34. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140294224 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61182921 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12789942 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 14136967 | US |