This application relates generally to hearing devices, including ear-worn electronic devices, hearing aids, personal amplification devices, and other hearables.
Hearing devices provide sound for the wearer. Some examples of hearing devices are headsets, hearing aids, speakers, cochlear implants, bone conduction devices, and personal listening devices. Hearing devices may be capable of performing wireless communication with other devices. For example, hearing aids provide amplification to compensate for hearing loss by transmitting amplified sounds to their ear canals. The sounds may be detected from the wearer's environment using the microphone in a hearing aid and/or received from a streaming device via a wireless link. Wireless communication may also be performed for programming the hearing aid and receiving information from the hearing aid. For performing such wireless communication, hearing devices such as hearing aids may each include a wireless transceiver and an antenna.
Various embodiments are directed to an ear-worn electronic device configured to be worn by a wearer. The device comprises an enclosure configured to be supported by or in an ear of the wearer. Electronic circuitry is disposed in the enclosure and comprises a wireless transceiver. An antenna is situated in or on the enclosure and coupled to the wireless transceiver. The antenna comprises a first antenna element, a second antenna element, and a reactive component coupled to the first and second antenna elements.
According to other embodiments, an ear-worn electronic device is configured to be worn by a wearer and comprises an enclosure configured to be supported by or in an ear of the wearer. Electronic circuitry is disposed in the enclosure and comprises a wireless transceiver. An antenna is situated in or on the enclosure and comprises a first antenna element having a first side and an opposing second side. The first side of the first antenna element is connected to a first feed line conductor. The antenna comprises a second antenna element having a first side and an opposing second side. The first side of the second antenna element is connected to a second feed line conductor. The first and second feed line conductors are coupled to the wireless transceiver. A strap is connected to the second side of the first antenna element and the second side of the second antenna element. The strap comprises a reactive component.
The above summary is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every implementation of the present disclosure. The figures and the detailed description below more particularly exemplify illustrative embodiments.
Throughout the specification reference is made to the appended drawings wherein:
The figures are not necessarily to scale. Like numbers used in the figures refer to like components. However, it will be understood that the use of a number to refer to a component in a given figure is not intended to limit the component in another figure labeled with the same number;
It is understood that the embodiments described herein may be used with any ear-worn electronic device without departing from the scope of this disclosure. The devices depicted in the figures are intended to demonstrate the subject matter, but not in a limited, exhaustive, or exclusive sense. Ear-worn electronic devices, such as hearables (e.g., wearable earphones, ear monitors, and earbuds), hearing aids, and hearing assistance devices, typically include an enclosure, such as a housing or shell, within which internal components are disposed. Typical components of an ear-worn electronic device can include a digital signal processor (DSP), memory, power management circuitry, one or more communication devices (e.g., a radio, a near-field magnetic induction (NFMI) device), one or more antennas, one or more microphones, and a receiver/speaker, for example. Ear-worn electronic devices can incorporate a long-range communication device, such as a Bluetooth® transceiver or other type of radio frequency (RF) transceiver. A communication device (e.g., a radio or NFMI device) of an ear-worn electronic device can be configured to facilitate communication between a left ear device and a right ear device of the ear-worn electronic device.
Ear-worn electronic devices of the present disclosure can incorporate an antenna arrangement coupled to a high-frequency radio, such as a 2.4 GHz radio. The radio can conform to an IEEE 802.11 (e.g., WiFi®) or Bluetooth® (e.g., BLE, Bluetooth® 4.2 or 5.0) specification, for example. It is understood that hearing devices of the present disclosure can employ other radios, such as a 900 MHz radio. Ear-worn electronic devices of the present disclosure can be configured to receive streaming audio (e.g., digital audio data or files) from an electronic or digital source. Representative electronic/digital sources (e.g., accessory devices) include an assistive listening system, a TV streamer, a radio, a smartphone, a laptop, a cell phone/entertainment device (CPED) or other electronic device that serves as a source of digital audio data or other types of data files. Ear-worn electronic devices of the present disclosure can be configured to effect bi-directional communication (e.g., wireless communication) of data with an external source, such as a remote server via the Internet or other communication infrastructure.
The term ear-worn electronic device of the present disclosure refers to a wide variety of ear-level electronic devices that can aid a person with impaired hearing. The term ear-worn electronic device also refers to a wide variety of devices that can produce optimized or processed sound for persons with normal hearing. Ear-worn electronic devices of the present disclosure include hearables (e.g., wearable earphones, headphones, earbuds, virtual reality headsets), hearing aids (e.g., hearing instruments), cochlear implants, and bone-conduction devices, for example. Ear-worn electronic devices include, but are not limited to, behind-the-ear (BTE), in-the-ear (ITE), in-the-canal (ITC), invisible-in-canal (IIC), receiver-in-canal (RIC), receiver-in-the-ear (RITE) or completely-in-the-canal (CIC) type hearing devices or some combination of the above. Throughout this disclosure, reference is made to an “ear-worn electronic device,” which is understood to refer to a system comprising one of a left ear device and a right ear device or a combination of a left ear device and a right ear device.
In general terms, a matching network is a type of electronic circuit that is designed to be mounted between a radio (e.g., radio chip) and the antenna feed. In principle, these electronic circuits should match the radio output impedance to the antenna input impedance (or match the radio input impedance to the antenna output impedance when in a receive mode) for maximum power transfer. In accordance with embodiments of the disclosure, a reactively loaded network circuit is placed on the antenna structure itself, rather than at the antenna feed point. Unlike a traditional matching network, a reactively loaded network circuit placed on the antenna structure enhances the antenna radiation properties in addition to reducing the impedance mismatch factor. This yields much better performance in terms of the antenna efficiency. In some embodiments, inclusion of a reactively loaded network circuit placed on the antenna structure provides for the elimination of a matching network between the radio and the antenna feed point. In other embodiments, inclusion of a reactively loaded network circuit placed on the antenna structure provides for a reduction in the complexity (e.g., a reduced number of components) needed for impedance matching between the radio and the antenna feed point.
In the embodiment shown in
As is shown in
In the embodiment illustrated in
According to various embodiments, the antenna 108 is configured as a bowtie antenna. Bowtie antennas are generally known as dipole broadband antennas, and can be referred to as “butterfly” antennas or “biconical” antennas. In general, a bowtie antenna can include two roughly parallel conductive plates that can be fed at a gap between the two conductive plates. Examples of the bowtie antenna as used in hearing aids are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/706,173, entitled “HEARING AID BOWTIE ANTENNA OPTIMIZED FOR EAR TO EAR COMMUNICATIONS”, filed on May 7, 2015, and in U.S. patent applicant Ser. No. 15/331,077, entitled “HEARING DEVICE WITH BOWTIE ANTENNA OPTIMIZED FOR SPECIFIC BAND, filed on Oct. 21, 2016, which are commonly assigned to Starkey Laboratories, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. It is understood that antennas other than bowtie antennas can be implemented to include an on-antenna reactively loaded network circuit in accordance with embodiments of the disclosure. Such antennas include any antenna structure that includes two or more somewhat independent portions that may be loaded with elements connecting at least two or more of these portions. Representative antennas include dipoles, monopoles, dipoles with capacitive-hats, monopoles with capacitive-hats, folded dipoles or monopoles, meandered dipoles or monopoles, loop antennas, yagi-uda antennas, log-periodic antennas, slot antennas, inverted-F antennas (IFA), planer inverted-F antennas (PIFA), rectangular microstrip (patch) antennas, and spiral antennas.
Designing antennas with high efficiency for ear-worn electronic devices, such as hearing aids for example, is a very challenging task. When used in an electronic device that is to be worn on or in a wearer's head, the impedance of the antenna can be substantially affected by the presence of human tissue, which degrades the antenna performance. Such effect is known as head loading and can make the performance of the antenna when the electronic device is worn (referred to as “on head performance”) substantially different from the performance of the antenna when the electronic device is not worn. Impedance of the antenna including effects of head loading depends on the configuration and placement of the antenna, which are constrained by size and placement of other components of the ear-worn electronic device.
Performance of an antenna in wireless communication, such as its radiation efficiency, depends on impedance matching between the feed point of the antenna and the output of the communication circuit such as a transceiver. The impendence of the antenna is a function of the operating frequency of the wireless communication. The small physical size of the antenna of an ear-worn electronic device with respect to its operating frequency imposes significant physical constraints and limits the total radiated power (TRP) of the antenna. Embodiments of the disclosure provide from a significant increase antenna TRP and improved impedance matching by incorporating a reactively loaded network circuit on the antenna itself.
In various embodiments, the antenna shown in
According to some embodiments, and as shown in
It was found by the inventors that incorporating the reactive component 212 in the antenna structure itself significantly improve the radiation efficiency of the antenna 200. As will be discussed in detail hereinbelow, the total radiated power of the antenna 200 can be increased significantly by adding the reactive component 212 to the antenna structure itself. This improvement in antenna performance results from a change in the current flow through the antenna 200.
The RF current flow in an antenna is a function of location and physics. Different voltage differences also exist between the two antenna portions at different physical locations. Introducing the correct impedance across the two antenna elements at specific locations causes current to flow between the two connected antenna portions. The amount of current depends on the magnitude and phase of the connecting impedance relative to the antenna portions differential source impedance and voltage at the connection points. The amount and phase of current is chosen to optimize either antenna efficiency or antenna feed-point impedance, or both.
The reactive component 212 or load modifies the antenna's surface current to allow for more current distribution over the whole structure of the antenna 200 which enhances the antenna radiation properties. Additionally, this surface current distribution modifies the current at the feed point resulting in an increase in the input impedance, real part, and thus increasing the antenna efficiency as a result. Without this reactive component 212 or load, the antenna surface current could be limited to a few parts of the structure not allowing the desire surface current to distribute over the whole antenna structure. As a result, the input impedance of an unloaded antenna tends to be smaller than the loaded antenna.
When installed in an ear-worn electronic device, the first and second antenna elements 302 and 312 are roughly parallel to one another. It is noted that the second sides 306 and 316 of the first and second antenna elements 302 and 312 include a notched region 307 and 317 to accommodate one or more components or structures of the ear-worn electronic device. In an installed configuration, the first and second feed line conductors 308 and 318 are coupled to a wireless transceiver, either directly or via a matching network.
A strap 320 connects the second side 306 of the first antenna element 302 to the second side 316 of the second antenna element 312. The strap 320 supports or incorporates a reactive component 322, which may be a capacitor, an inductor, or the combination of a capacitor and inductor.
Various experiments were performed on a bowtie antenna of the type shown in
Antenna input impedance measurements (ohms) for the three difference antenna configurations were obtained using a 2.45 GHz signal generated by the radio chip. The real (R) and imaginary (X) parts of the antenna input impedance were measured and recorded for each of the left and right antenna elements 302 and 312. The total radiated power (in dBm) for each of the left and right antenna elements 302 and 312 was measured and recorded at each of five different frequencies (2404 MHz, 2420 MHz, 2440 MHz, 2460 MHz, and 2478 MHz).
In a first configuration that was evaluated, the antenna 300 included a strap 320 but did not include a reactive component 322. A matching network was not used between the feed line conductors 308 and 318 of the antenna 300 and the radio chip. The impedance measurements for this first antenna configuration are given below in Table 1.
The TRP measurements for this first antenna configuration are given below in Table 2. Table 2 includes the TRP measurements before and after use of a matching network (MN).
In a second configuration that was evaluated, the antenna 300 included a reactive component 322 on the strap 320 and a matching network between the radio chip and the antenna 300. The input impedance measurements for this second antenna configuration are given below in Table 3.
When comparing the input impedance measurements in Table 3 to those in Table 1, it can be seen that a significant increase (a factor of ˜1.56) in the real part of the input impedance is realized by inclusion of the reactive component 322 on the antenna structure. This increase in the antenna's input resistance corresponds to an increase in the efficiency of the antenna 300. This increase in the antenna's input resistance also results in a matching network design that is simpler (e.g., a reduced number of components) for those configurations that include a matching network.
In the second antenna configuration, the reactive component 322 was a capacitor having a value of 0.9 pF. The value of 0.9 pF was chosen such that it cancels the reactive part (the imaginary (X) part) of the input impedance as seen from the strap terminals. It is noted that the matching network for the second antenna configuration was designed after collecting the antenna input impedance values provided in Table 3.
The TRP measurements shown in Table 4 above, when compared to those of Table 2, demonstrate that an appreciable increase in TRP of antenna 300 (e.g., ˜2.8 dBm @ 2460 MHz) can be realized by inclusion of a reactive component 322 on the antenna structure.
In a third configuration that was evaluated, the antenna 300 included a reactive component 322 on the strap 320 and a matching network between the radio chip and the antenna 300. To further improve the efficiency of the antenna 300, the reactive component 322 used to load the strap 320 was further optimized to enhance antenna performance, particularly the antenna input resistance. This optimization resulted in use of a capacitor having a value of 1.2 pF. The input impedance measurements for this third antenna configuration are given below in Table 5.
When comparing the input impedance measurements in Table 5 to those in Table 1, it can be seen that a significant increase in the antenna's input resistance is realized by inclusion of the optimized reactive component 322 (1.2 pF capacitor) on the antenna structure. More particularly, the input resistance of the left antenna element 302 was increased from 18.40 ohm to 71 ohm (a factor of ˜3.8). The input resistance of the right antenna element 312 was increased from ˜21.26 ohm to 74 ohm (a factor of ˜3.5). As was discussed previously, this appreciable increase in the antenna's input resistance corresponds to an increase in the efficiency of the antenna 300 and a simplification of the matching network design (for those configurations that include a matching network).
The TRP measurements shown in Table 6 above when compared to those of Table 2 demonstrate that an appreciable increase in TRP of antenna 300 (e.g., ˜5.4 dBm) can be realized by including a reactive component 322 on the antenna structure and optimizing the antenna input resistance.
According to some embodiments, the antenna cutouts shown in
According to some embodiments, a reactively loaded network circuit of the type discussed herein can incorporate an interdigitated capacitor, rather than a surface mount capacitor.
The parameters L, W, G, GE, and N (number of fingers) can be selected to achieve a desired capacitance. As was discussed previously with respect to Tables 5 and 6, optimized antenna performance was achieved by incorporating a 1.2 pF capacitor between the first and second antenna elements of a bowtie antenna under evaluation. For the interdigitated capacitor 800 shown in
The ear-worn electronic device 1002 shown in
An audio output device 1010 is electrically connected to the DSP 1004 via the flexible mother circuit 1003. In some embodiments, the audio output device 1010 comprises a speaker (coupled to an amplifier). In other embodiments, the audio output device 1010 comprises an amplifier coupled to an external receiver 1012 adapted for positioning within an ear of a wearer. The ear-worn electronic device 1002 may incorporate a communication device 1007 coupled to the flexible mother circuit 1003 and to an antenna 1009 directly or indirectly via the flexible mother circuit 1003. The antenna 1009 can be a bowtie antenna which includes a reactive component 1011 coupled to first and second antenna elements of the antenna 1009. The communication device 1007 can be a Bluetooth® transceiver, such as a BLE (Bluetooth® low energy) transceiver or other transceiver (e.g., an IEEE 802.11 compliant device). The communication device 1007 can be configured to communicate with one or more external devices, such as those discussed previously, in accordance with various embodiments.
This document discloses numerous embodiments, including but not limited to the following:
Item 1 is an ear-worn electronic device configured to be worn by a wearer, comprising:
Item 2 is the device of Item 1, wherein the reactive component comprises a capacitor.
Item 3 is the device of Item 2, wherein the capacitor comprises an interdigitated capacitor.
Item 4 is the device of Item 1, wherein the reactive component comprises an inductor.
Item 5 is the device of Item 1, wherein the reactive component comprises an L-C network or an RLC network.
Item 6 is the device of Item 1, wherein the antenna comprises a strap between the first and second antenna elements.
Item 7 is the device of Item 6, wherein the reactive component comprises a surface mounted component disposed on the strap.
Item 8 is the device of Item 6, wherein the reactive component comprises a distributed component mounted to the strap.
Item 9 is the device of Item 6, wherein the strap comprises a shaped region that functions as the reactive component.
Item 10 is the device of Item 1, wherein the reactive component comprises a first reactive component connected to the first antenna element and a second reactive component connected to the second antenna element.
Item 11 is the device of Item 1, comprising a matching network disposed between the wireless transceiver and feed conductors of the antenna, wherein the matching network is configured to substantially cancel a reactance of the antenna at the feed conductors that is modified by a reactance of the reactive component.
Item 12 is the device of Item 1, wherein:
Item 13 is the device of Item 1, wherein the antenna is configured as a bowtie antenna.
Item 14 is an ear-worn electronic device configured to be worn by a wearer, comprising:
Item 15 is the device of Item 14, wherein the reactive component comprises a capacitor.
Item 16 is the device of Item 15, wherein the capacitor comprises an interdigitated capacitor.
Item 17 is the device of Item 14, wherein the reactive component comprises an inductor.
Item 18 is the device of Item 14, wherein the reactive component comprises an L-C network or an RLC network.
Item 19 is the device of Item 14, wherein the reactive component comprises a surface mounted component disposed on the strap.
Item 20 is the device of Item 14, wherein the reactive component comprises a distributed component mounted to the strap.
Item 21 is the device of Item 14, wherein the strap comprises a shaped region that functions as the reactive component.
Item 22 is the device of Item 14, wherein the strap comprises a first reactive component connected to the first antenna element and a second reactive component connected to the second antenna element.
Item 23 is the device of Item 14, comprising a matching network disposed between the wireless transceiver and the first and second feed line conductors of the antenna, wherein the matching network is configured to substantially cancel a reactance of the antenna at the first and second feed line conductors that is modified by a reactance of the reactive component.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as representative forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/231,722, filed Apr. 15, 2021, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/852,151, filed Apr. 17, 2020, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,012,795, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/718,760, filed Sep. 28, 2017, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,631,109, the entire content of each of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5394159 | Schneider | Feb 1995 | A |
6429819 | Bishop et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6762729 | Egashira | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762730 | Schadler | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768468 | Crouch et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7016738 | Karunasiri | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7148850 | Puente Baliarda et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7202822 | Baliarda et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7342545 | Huynh et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7751902 | Karunasiri | Jul 2010 | B1 |
8259026 | Pulimi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8405561 | Handy et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8406831 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8565457 | Polinske et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8724835 | Kerselaers et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
9300367 | Christensen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9374650 | Bauman | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9432779 | Kerselaers | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9484631 | Napoles et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9635475 | Polinske et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9641944 | Johnson et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9706318 | So et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9906879 | Prchal et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9980065 | Higgins et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10070232 | So et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10297910 | Hosadurga et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10631109 | Elghannai et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10931005 | Shriner et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10951997 | Shriner | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10979828 | Elghannai et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11012795 | Elghannai et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11678129 | Elghannai | Jun 2023 | B2 |
20050099341 | Zhang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117765 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060093172 | Ludvigsen | May 2006 | A1 |
20060220966 | Sarychev et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239483 | Orts et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080267436 | Kerselaers | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287084 | Krebs | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090219214 | Oh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100026775 | Parsi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20130257676 | Kerselaers | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130343586 | Kvist et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140091974 | Desclos et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140376735 | Asrani | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150042524 | Kerselaers | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049891 | Johnson | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150118973 | Montgomery | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160141757 | Lai et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160295335 | Vajha et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160330552 | Flood | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160366525 | Bodvarsson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381471 | Henriksen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20180027343 | Dobson et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180069322 | Vouvakis et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180084351 | Polinske et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180124528 | Polinkse et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20190116431 | Hesselballe et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190116435 | Hesselballe et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20210235206 | Elghannai et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2680613 | Jan 2014 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Berge et al., “Tuning a Dual-Band Bowtie Slot Antenna with Parabolic Radiating Slots for the 900 MHz and 2400 MHz Bands”, 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Mar. 2012, pp. 2376-2379. |
Fractus Antennas User Manual Micro Reach Xtend (FR05-S1-N-0-110), Nov. 2017, 12 pp. |
Garje et al., “Single-Fee Triangular Slotted Microstrip Bowtie Antenna for Quad-bands Applications”, IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 11, Issue 5, Ver. III, Sep.-Oct. 2016, pp. 22-27. |
Mansoul et al., “Multiband reconfigurable Bowtie slot antenna using switchable slot extension for WiFi, WiMAX, and WLAN applications”, Microw Opt Technol Lett; 60, Feb. 2018 pp. 413-418. |
Murata et al., “Broadband Characteristics Analysis of Semicircle-Type Bow-tie Antenna with Hole Slots”, Electrical Engineering in Japan, vol. 159, No. 4, 2007, pp. 47-53. (Applicant points out, in accordance with MPEP 609.04(a), that the year of publication, 2007, is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date, so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.). |
Murugaveni et al., “Design of Slotted Waveguide Antenna for Radar Applications at X-Band”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 3, Issue 11, Nov. 2014, pp. 426-428. |
Notice of Allowance of U.S. Appl. No. 16/852,151, mailed Jan. 22, 2021, 8 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 15/718,760, dated Jan. 31, 2019 through Dec. 18, 2019, 81 pp. |
Prosecution History from U.S. Appl. No. 17/231,722, dated Sep. 1, 2022 through Feb. 7, 2023, 10 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230276183 A1 | Aug 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17231722 | Apr 2021 | US |
Child | 18311887 | US | |
Parent | 16852151 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 17231722 | US | |
Parent | 15718760 | Sep 2017 | US |
Child | 16852151 | US |